The Grumman X-29 was built from nothing to answer a question that could not be answered any other way, and after four articles about aircraft that were not built for research, that sentence marks a break. The X-25 was a catalogue autogyro. The X-26 was a catalogue sailplane, bought twice. The X-27 was a private-venture fighter that was never built at all. The X-28 was a homebuilt flying boat bought off a private individual for five thousand dollars. The X-29 is the first purpose-built research aeroplane in this series since the X-24, and it was built to settle something specific. This is the thirtieth article in the X-Planes series, following the X-1, the X-2, the X-3, the X-4, the X-5, the X-6, the X-7, the X-8, the X-9, the X-10, the X-11, the X-12, the X-13, the X-14, the X-15, the X-16, the X-17, the X-18, the X-19, the X-20, the X-21, the X-22, the X-23, the X-24, the X-25, the X-26, the X-27, and the X-28.

The easy misreading of this aircraft is that it existed to find out whether a forward-swept wing would work. It did not. A theory of wing divergence was published in 1926 [Aeroelastic divergence], the fall in divergence speed with forward sweep was charted and checked experimentally by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics by 1948 [Diederich and Budiansky 1948], it is in every aeroelasticity textbook, and no research aeroplane was needed to establish it. A forward-swept wing bends upward under load, the bending increases the local angle of attack, the increased angle increases the lift, and the loop closes on itself at a computable dynamic pressure. That much was arithmetic by 1948.

What was new was the claim that the divergence could be held rather than avoided, by two means working at once. The first is aeroelastic tailoring, which uses the bend-twist coupling of an unbalanced composite laminate to cancel the aerodynamic coupling inside the structure. The second is active control of an airframe deliberately made unstable, held by a triplex digital fly-by-wire system running at forty hertz.

The Research Question

The keystone is the structure and the control law together, and separating them misses the aircraft.

The X-29A was statically unstable by a nominal thirty-five percent of the mean aerodynamic chord, which is to say its static margin was that far negative, in subsonic flight, and the primary record is unusually direct about why. The instability was not a side effect of the forward sweep. It was created by the canard [Sims et al. 1989]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Memorandum 100407 states that the presence of the canards results in an otherwise neutrally stable airframe having a negative static margin of nominally thirty-five percent, which makes the instability a deliberate purchase rather than a penalty [Hicks and Matheny 1987].

So the aircraft posed two coupled questions that had to be answered by the same airframe at the same time.

  • Can a wing be made to resist divergence by the arrangement of its fibres, rather than by being made thicker, heavier or less swept.
  • Can an airframe that doubles a pitch disturbance in a fraction of a second be flown, by a sampled digital controller with a finite update rate and a finite failure probability.

Neither question can be settled on the ground. A wind tunnel model can be tailored and tested, and several were, but a tunnel model does not carry a flight control system, a hydraulic actuator, a failure-tolerant voter or a pilot [Landsberger and Dugundji 1985] [Chen and Dugundji 1987]. An iron-bird simulator carries all of those and does not carry an elastic wing in a real airflow. The X-29 exists because those two halves had to be connected, and connecting them required an aeroplane.

Why the Keystone Is Not the Planform

The obvious alternative keystone is the forward sweep itself, treated as an aerodynamic choice, and that framing is available because the programme did claim aerodynamic benefits. Its flight test overview gives a prediction of up to thirteen percent lower aircraft drag for wings of the same aspect ratio, arising from reduced transonic wing profile drag [Hicks and Huckabine 1989].

That claim is examined below and its geometric mechanism survives, but it is not what needed an aeroplane. The flight programme did not demonstrate the overall drag reduction that earlier studies had suggested [Gelzer 2015] [Jenkins, Landis and Miller]. Transonic drag is measurable in a tunnel. What is not measurable in a tunnel is whether a wing designed to sit inside a divergence boundary actually sits inside it once built, instrumented and flown, and whether the boundary can be located from flight data before it is reached. The X-29 answered that, and the answer arrived by a method that had never previously been used in flight. [Hicks and Matheny 1987]

Programme Origin

The programme began with a government agency rather than a manufacturer, which distinguishes it sharply from the four articles before it.

The Agency

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency began the X-29A project in 1977. The aircraft was designed and built by the Grumman Aerospace Corporation and delivered to the Dryden Flight Research Facility of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration at Edwards, California, where the flight programme was conducted jointly [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Gelzer 2015].

Two aircraft were built. They carried a shared research agenda that was divided between them, the first taking the envelope expansion and performance work and the second taking the high angle of attack investigation [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Gelzer 2015].

Why Forward Sweep Became Buildable in the 1970s

The idea was old. The Junkers Ju 287 flew a forward-swept wing in 1944, and the Hansa Jet carried one into production in the 1960s. What changed was not the aerodynamic idea but the material.

A metal wing resists divergence only through its torsional stiffness, and buying enough of that at a useful sweep angle costs weight that consumes the configuration’s advantages. A composite laminate can be made to twist in a chosen direction when it bends, because the fibres need not run along the principal axes of the structure. That converts divergence resistance from a mass problem into a geometry problem, and the structural loads report describes the outcome directly, crediting the tailored skins with achieving their result with an insignificant weight penalty over that required for the basic strength design [Sims et al. 1989].

That sentence carries the justification for the programme, and the article’s structural half is an examination of whether the physics supports it.

Where the Aircraft Came From

The airframe was assembled from existing parts wherever the research did not require otherwise. The flight test overview lists the forward fuselage and nose gear of an F-5A, the main landing gear and servo-actuators of an F-16, and F-14 avionics [Hicks and Huckabine 1989].

Only the parts carrying the research question were new. The wing, the canard, the strake flaps and the flight control system were designed for this aircraft [Hicks and Huckabine 1989]. Everything else was bought from the company’s own back catalogue and from its competitors, which is why two research aeroplanes were affordable at all.

The Vehicle

Quantity Value
Wing reference area 185 ft²
Aspect ratio 4.0
Leading edge sweep 29.3° forward
Structural axis sweep 36.2° forward
Mean aerodynamic chord 86.6 in
Thickness to chord ratio 5 to 7 percent
Aerofoil Grumman K Mod 2 supercritical
Design section lift coefficient 0.92 at Mach 0.90
Canard area 20 percent of wing reference area
Canard mean aerodynamic chord 0.76 of the wing’s
Canard deflection 30° leading edge up to 60° leading edge down
Canard rate 100 deg/s
Flaperon deflection 10° up to 24.75° down
Flaperon rate 68 deg/s
Strake flap deflection 30° up to 30° down
Static margin 35 percent negative, subsonic
Flight control system triplex digital, 40 Hz update
Engine General Electric F404-GE-400, 16,000 lb class
Maximum takeoff gross weight 17,800 lb
Fuel capacity 4,000 lb
Maneuver design gross weight 15,000 lb
Design load factor 8 g subsonic, 6.5 g supersonic
Design dynamic pressure 1,700 lb/ft² at Mach 1.07, sea level

The table draws on the flight reports [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Hicks and Huckabine 1989] [Sims et al. 1989]. The reference area is the trapezoidal outer panel extended to the centreline, without the canards, the strake flaps or the forward root extensions [Hicks and Huckabine 1989]. The encyclopaedia entry gives 188.84 square feet [Grumman X-29], which the later lift and drag report lists as the exposed wing area [Saltzman et al. 1994]. Using it in place of the reference area would lower the wing loadings below by 2.0 percent and shorten the doubling times by 1.0 percent.

What the Table Implies

Before either of those, the table supports a handful of ratios that it does not state, and they place the aircraft among its contemporaries. The sizing conventions used here follow Raymer, with the airframe practice in Niu.

The wing loading is the gross weight carried per unit of reference area.

\[\frac{W}{S} = \frac{17{,}800\ \mathrm{lb}}{185\ \mathrm{ft}^2} = 96.22\ \mathrm{lb/ft^2} \tag{1}\]

At the manoeuvre design gross weight the same relation gives 81.08 pounds per square foot, and both figures are ordinary for a fighter-sized aircraft of the period.

The thrust-to-weight ratio uses the engine’s class rating, because the record gives no installed thrust figure.

\[\frac{T}{W} = \frac{16{,}000\ \mathrm{lb}}{17{,}800\ \mathrm{lb}} = 0.899 \tag{2}\] \[\left.\frac{T}{W}\right|_{\mathrm{manoeuvre}} = \frac{16{,}000\ \mathrm{lb}}{15{,}000\ \mathrm{lb}} = 1.067 \tag{3}\]

At the manoeuvre design weight the aircraft has more thrust than weight, which matters below because it makes the airframe rather than the engine the binding limit in a sustained turn.

The canard is quoted only as a percentage, so its area and chord follow.

\[S_c = 0.20\,S = 0.20 \times 185\ \mathrm{ft}^2 = 37.00\ \mathrm{ft}^2 \tag{4}\]

The later lift and drag report gives the canard reference area as 37.0 square feet [Saltzman et al. 1994].

\[\bar{c}_c = 0.76\,\bar{c} = 0.76 \times 7.217\ \mathrm{ft} = 5.485\ \mathrm{ft} \tag{5}\]

The design load and the fuel fraction complete the picture.

\[n W = 8.0 \times 15{,}000\ \mathrm{lb} = 120{,}000\ \mathrm{lb} \tag{6}\]

The wing carries 120,000 pounds at the subsonic design limit, the load the structural box and its tailored skins had to survive while also satisfying the divergence requirement.

\[\frac{W_{\mathrm{fuel}}}{W_{\max}} = \frac{4{,}000\ \mathrm{lb}}{17{,}800\ \mathrm{lb}} = 0.225 \tag{7}\]

The heaviest weight flown exceeded the manoeuvre design weight by eighteen percent, which the record states and which the ratio confirms [Sims et al. 1989].

\[\frac{17{,}700}{15{,}000} - 1 = 0.180 \tag{8}\]

Two entries in that table are the aeroplane and the rest follows from them.

The first is the structural axis sweep of 36.2 degrees forward, seven degrees more forward than the leading edge [Sims et al. 1989]. That difference is not incidental. It means the structure is swept further forward than the planform suggests, and since divergence is governed by the elastic axis rather than by the leading edge, the wing is aeroelastically more forward-swept than it looks.

Beside it stands the static margin of minus thirty-five percent, and the number is not small. The F-16, the first production fighter designed to be intentionally unstable, was only slightly so [General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon]. This aircraft was built much further into instability than the aircraft it was meant to inform.

A Consistency Check on the Published Geometry

The flight test overview gives the aspect ratio as 4.0, the reference area as 185 square feet and the reference span as 27.2 feet [Hicks and Huckabine 1989]. Those are three statements about two quantities, so one of them can be checked.

\[b = \sqrt{A S} = \sqrt{4.0 \times 185\ \mathrm{ft}^2} = 27.20\ \mathrm{ft} \tag{9}\]

Against the span of 27 feet 2.44 inches in the structural loads report [Sims et al. 1989] that is an agreement to better than 0.01 percent. The exposed area of 188.84 square feet would return 27.48 feet, about one percent long, so the aspect ratio of 4.0 is defined on the reference area and the larger figure is a different definition of wing area [Saltzman et al. 1994]. The published geometry is mutually consistent, and that needs establishing before anything is built on top of it.

Sizing From First Principles

The inventory of record for the whole series, and the source for this aircraft’s place in it, is Jenkins, Landis and Miller.

The aeroelastic relations used throughout follow Bisplinghoff, Ashley and Halfman and Fung, with the modern treatments in Hodges and Pierce and Wright and Cooper. The flight mechanics follow Etkin and the control formulation Stevens and Lewis. The laminate mechanics behind aeroelastic tailoring are in Jones and Tsai and Hahn, the airframe structures in Megson and Niu, and the sizing and drag data in Raymer, Anderson and Hoerner.

The X-29’s divergence boundary is not stated as a number in the reports cited here. What was published is something better, because it can be inverted.

The Relation Behind the Inversion

A wing that washes in under load amplifies its own lift. At any dynamic pressure below the divergence boundary the elastic wing produces more lift per degree of angle of attack than the same wing would produce if it were rigid, and the ratio between the two grows without limit as the boundary is approached. That growth without limit is the definition of divergence rather than a consequence of it.

For the single-degree-of-freedom case the relation is exact.

\[\frac{C_{L_\alpha}^{\mathrm{elastic}}}{C_{L_\alpha}^{\mathrm{rigid}}} = \frac{1}{1 - q/q_D} \tag{10}\]

Here $q$ is the free-stream dynamic pressure and $q_D$ is the divergence dynamic pressure, the value at which the amplification becomes unbounded.

Where the Amplification Comes From

The relation is not asserted. It follows from the feedback loop the wing closes.

An unswept wing with its aerodynamic centre a distance $e$ ahead of the elastic axis, restrained by a torsional stiffness $K_\theta$, twists under its own lift until the elastic moment balances the aerodynamic one.

\[K_\theta\,\theta = q\,S\,e\,a\left(\alpha_0 + \theta\right) \tag{11}\]

Solving for the elastic twist shows the denominator that governs everything.

\[\theta = \frac{q\,S\,e\,a\,\alpha_0}{K_\theta - q\,S\,e\,a} \tag{12}\]

The twist becomes unbounded when the denominator vanishes, which defines the divergence dynamic pressure.

\[q_D = \frac{K_\theta}{S\,e\,a} \tag{13}\]

Substituting that back gives the total angle of attack, and therefore the lift, as the rigid value multiplied by a single factor.

\[\alpha_0 + \theta = \frac{\alpha_0}{1 - q/q_D} \tag{14}\]

For the research literature behind this relation, see the cluster on structural mechanics, buckling and structural weight under The Contemporary Literature.

The amplification is the same factor for lift, for twist and for the loads, so a prediction of it is worth publishing and an error in it moves every quantity at once.

A single report states both of the quantities needed to invert this. The structural loads memorandum, Technical Memorandum 101715, gives the wing’s predicted elastic-to-rigid lift-curve-slope ratio as about 1.6, and gives the design dynamic pressure as 1,700 pounds per square foot at Mach 1.07 at sea level [Sims et al. 1989]. Neither figure was derived from the other.

Checking the Design Point Against Itself

Before inverting anything, the design point is quoted twice over, once as a dynamic pressure and once as a Mach number at an altitude, so the two statements can be checked against one another.

\[q = \tfrac{1}{2} \rho_0 \left(M a_0\right)^2 = \tfrac{1}{2} \times 0.0023769 \times \left(1.07 \times 1116.45\ \mathrm{ft/s}\right)^2 = 1695.9\ \mathrm{lb/ft^2} \tag{15}\]

Against the quoted 1,700 pounds per square foot that agrees to 0.24 percent. The check is on the source alone, and it passes, so the two statements in the report describe the same flight condition and either may be used.

Inverting for the Divergence Boundary

Rearranging the amplification relation for $q_D$ gives the boundary directly.

\[q_D = \frac{q}{1 - 1/r}, \qquad r = \frac{C_{L_\alpha}^{\mathrm{elastic}}}{C_{L_\alpha}^{\mathrm{rigid}}} \tag{16}\]

Substituting the two published figures,

\[\frac{q}{q_D} = 1 - \frac{1}{1.6} = 0.375 \tag{17}\] \[q_D = \frac{1700\ \mathrm{lb/ft^2}}{0.375} = 4533\ \mathrm{lb/ft^2} \tag{18}\]

The X-29A’s wing diverged at about 4,533 pounds per square foot, and that number appears in none of the reports cited here. It follows from two figures that do appear, through a relation neither was derived from, and it requires no knowledge whatever of the wing’s stiffness, its geometry, its material or its ply angles.

What That Margin Was

The margin is best stated twice, because dynamic pressure and speed are not the same statement.

\[\frac{q_D}{q_{\mathrm{design}}} = 2.667, \qquad \frac{V_D}{V_{\mathrm{design}}} = \sqrt{2.667} = 1.633 \tag{19}\]

Dynamic pressure and equivalent airspeed are related through sea-level density alone, so equivalent airspeed is the natural currency for a structural limit.

\[q = \tfrac{1}{2}\rho V^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}\rho_0 V_e^2, \qquad V_e = \sqrt{\frac{2q}{\rho_0}} \tag{20}\]

Expressed as equivalent airspeeds,

\[V_{e,\mathrm{design}} = 709\ \mathrm{kt}, \qquad V_{e,D} = 1157\ \mathrm{kt} \tag{21}\]

A factor of 2.667 in dynamic pressure sounds comfortable and a factor of 1.633 in speed sounds much less so, and a pilot experiences the latter. The aircraft’s design point sat at thirty-seven and a half percent of the way to a structural instability with no natural limit, and the amplification at that point was already sixty percent.

The approach is tabulated below, because the relation is strongly non-linear and its behaviour near the boundary makes the problem difficult.

Dynamic pressure, lb/ft² Fraction of $q_D$ Elastic-to-rigid ratio
500 0.110 1.124
1,000 0.221 1.283
1,500 0.331 1.495
1,700 0.375 1.600
2,000 0.441 1.789
3,000 0.662 2.957
4,000 0.882 8.500
4,400 0.971 34.000

How Hard the Answer Leans on a Rounded Figure

The boundary was inverted from a ratio quoted to two significant figures, so the cost of that rounding needs measuring. Writing the inversion as a product makes the sensitivity immediate.

\[q_D = \frac{q\,r}{r - 1} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad \frac{d \ln q_D}{d \ln r} = -\frac{1}{r - 1} \tag{22}\] \[\left.\frac{d \ln q_D}{d \ln r}\right|_{r = 1.6} = -\frac{1}{0.6} = -1.667 \tag{23}\]

A one percent error in the published ratio is a 1.67 percent error in the boundary derived from it, and the sign is negative, so a ratio that was optimistically low produces a boundary that is optimistically high. That elasticity is used again in the section on where the framing breaks down.

The 3,000 and 4,000 rows of the table under What That Margin Was explain why the margin had to be as large as it was. Between 3,000 and 4,000 pounds per square foot the wing’s lift amplification triples, and a design error of ten percent in the predicted boundary moves the loads by far more than ten percent. The penalty for being wrong is not proportional to the size of the error.

For comparison, the same report notes that conventional aft-swept wings have elastic-to-rigid ratios below one [Sims et al. 1989], because bending washes them out rather than in. The X-29’s wing sits on the other side of unity by construction, and the sign alone separates the two.

The Contemporary Literature gathers the work on this subject in the cluster on divergence and static aeroelasticity.

Where the Washin Comes From

The inverted boundary is a number without a mechanism. The mechanism is one line of geometry.

Let $y$ run along the wing’s elastic axis and let $\Lambda$ be the sweep of that axis, positive aft. A deformed section rotates for two reasons, namely the elastic twist $\theta$ about the axis and the bending slope $w’$ perpendicular to it. Resolving both onto the spanwise direction that a streamwise section pitches about gives the change in streamwise angle of attack.

\[\Delta\alpha(y) = \theta(y)\cos\Lambda - w'(y)\sin\Lambda \tag{24}\]

That single relation contains the forward-sweep problem. For an aft-swept wing $\sin\Lambda$ is positive, so upward bending subtracts from the angle of attack and the wing washes out, a stabilising effect that makes swept-back wings difficult to diverge. For a forward-swept wing $\sin\Lambda$ is negative, the sign of the bending term reverses, and upward bending adds to the angle of attack. The wing washes in, the lift grows, the bending grows, and the loop closes.

The sign of one trigonometric function is the difference between a wing that is safe and a wing that needs a research programme.

What a Two-Mode Model Is For

The boundary is already known from the inversion above and needs no model. What a model supplies is the scaling, meaning how the boundary moves with sweep and with bend-twist coupling, and the rest of this section uses that scaling.

Take a uniform cantilever wing of semispan $L$, streamwise chord $c$, bending stiffness $EI$ and torsional stiffness $GJ$, with a composite constitutive law that couples the two.

\[\begin{Bmatrix} M \\ T \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} EI & K \\ K & GJ \end{bmatrix} \begin{Bmatrix} w'' \\ \theta' \end{Bmatrix} \tag{25}\]

Here $K$ is the bend-twist coupling that aeroelastic tailoring exists to supply, and $K = 0$ is the isotropic metal wing. Assume the lowest admissible mode shapes, writing $\eta = y/L$ for the fractional station, namely $w = h\,\eta^2$ and $\theta = \Theta\,\eta$, and apply strip theory with the lift acting a distance $e$ ahead of the elastic axis. The equilibrium condition becomes a generalised eigenvalue problem in the dynamic pressure.

\[\left(\mathbf{S} - q\,\mathbf{A}\right)\begin{Bmatrix} h \\ \Theta \end{Bmatrix} = \mathbf{0}, \qquad \det\left(\mathbf{S} - q\,\mathbf{A}\right) = 0 \tag{26}\]

with the structural and aerodynamic matrices following from the assumed modes,

\[\mathbf{S} = \begin{bmatrix} 4EI/L^3 & 2K/L^2 \\ 2K/L^2 & GJ/L \end{bmatrix}, \qquad \mathbf{A} = c\,a\begin{bmatrix} -\tfrac{1}{2}\sin\Lambda & \tfrac{L}{4}\cos\Lambda \\ -\tfrac{2e}{3}\sin\Lambda & \tfrac{eL}{3}\cos\Lambda \end{bmatrix} \tag{27}\]

The structural matrix follows from the strain energy of the coupled beam evaluated on those shapes.

\[U = \tfrac{1}{2}\int_0^L \left[ EI\,(w'')^2 + GJ\,(\theta')^2 + 2K\,w''\theta' \right] dy \tag{28}\] \[\int_0^L (\phi'')^2 dy = \frac{4}{L^3}, \qquad \int_0^L (\psi')^2 dy = \frac{1}{L}, \qquad \int_0^L \phi''\psi'\,dy = \frac{2}{L^2} \tag{29}\]

The characteristic equation is linear rather than quadratic, an exact consequence of the model and not an approximation. The quadratic coefficient is

\[(ca)^2 e\,L\cos\Lambda\sin\Lambda\left(-\tfrac{1}{6} + \tfrac{1}{6}\right) = 0 \tag{30}\]

identically. The point matters because a solver that does not know it will find the cancellation only to floating-point precision, take the quadratic branch, and return values with no physical content whatever. A solver that takes that branch reports a divergence dynamic pressure many orders of magnitude beyond any physical value. A residue sixteen orders of magnitude below the terms that produced it is enormous in absolute terms, so an absolute tolerance cannot catch it and the test has to be made relative to the magnitude of what cancelled.

Work on assumed-mode methods is surveyed in the cluster on the Southwell method, Rayleigh-Ritz and assumed modes.

The Root in Closed Form

Because the characteristic equation is linear, the untailored root can be written out, and the closed form is far more informative than the eigenvalue it came from.

\[\frac{1}{q_D} = \underbrace{\frac{c\,a\,e\,L^2\cos\Lambda}{3\,GJ}}_{\text{torsion}} \;-\; \underbrace{\frac{c\,a\,L^3\sin\Lambda}{8\,EI}}_{\text{bending}} \tag{31}\]

The first term is ordinary torsional divergence and is always positive. What follows it is the bending contribution, and its sign is the sign of the sweep. Aft sweep subtracts from the reciprocal and raises the boundary. Forward sweep adds to it and lowers the boundary. The forward-sweep problem is one minus sign in one term.

The relation also shows something the eigenvalue does not. If aft sweep is carried far enough the two terms cancel, the reciprocal vanishes, and the boundary goes to infinity. Setting them equal and dividing through by the cosine gives the critical angle in closed form.

\[\tan\Lambda_{\mathrm{crit}} = \frac{8\,e\,EI}{3\,GJ\,L}, \qquad \Lambda_{\mathrm{crit}} = 48.013^\circ \tag{32}\]

The closed form checks the numerical solver as much as it delivers a result. It and the eigenvalue scan agree to every digit printed at every sweep angle tested, from forty degrees forward to forty-eight aft, and that agreement makes the sweep table below trustworthy although its stiffnesses were never published.

Its literature appears under The Contemporary Literature, mostly in the cluster on transonic wing design and sweep.

The Sweep Trend

With the model behaving, the boundary can be tracked across sweep at fixed stiffness. The absolute values below depend on stiffnesses that were never published and are therefore assumed, so only the ratios carry meaning and the table is normalised on the unswept case.

Elastic axis sweep $q_D$ relative to unswept
40° forward 0.744
36.2° forward 0.747
30° forward 0.760
20° forward 0.801
10° forward 0.876
0° 1.000
10° aft 1.207
20° aft 1.583
30° aft 2.404

Sweeping aft raises the boundary steeply and sweeping forward lowers it, as expected. Pushed further, the model does something better than agreeing in direction.

\[\Lambda \geq \Lambda_{\mathrm{crit}} = 48.0^\circ \implies \text{no positive root, and therefore no divergence boundary at all} \tag{33}\]

Sufficient sweepback removes divergence entirely. The classical textbook result agrees, and the model was not fitted to reproduce it. Recovering it from an independent scan of the determinant is the strongest available evidence that the formulation is sound, and on that evidence the sweep trend above can be trusted even though the absolute numbers cannot.

What Aeroelastic Tailoring Had to Supply

Bend-twist coupling is reported here as a non-dimensional ratio, because the raw stiffness is meaningless without the others. The laminate mechanics behind it are in Jones and Tsai and Hahn, and the aeroelastic consequences in Bisplinghoff, Ashley and Halfman and Hodges and Pierce.

\[\psi = \frac{K}{\sqrt{EI \cdot GJ}} \tag{34}\]

The bound on it is the determinant of the stiffness matrix staying positive.

\[EI \cdot GJ - K^2 > 0 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \lvert \psi \rvert < 1 \tag{35}\]

The bound $\lvert \psi \rvert < 1$ is not a modelling convenience. It is positive definiteness of the stiffness matrix, a condition on strain energy, and no laminate at any ply angle can exceed it. Because of that bound the following question has a definite answer.

Coupling $\psi$ $q_D$ relative to untailored
0.00 1.000
0.10 1.129
0.20 1.274
0.30 1.444
0.40 1.657
0.50 1.954
0.60 2.456
0.70 3.712
0.80 25.444
0.8117 divergence eliminated entirely

Two results follow, of which the later one carries more weight.

First, the coupling needed to reach the X-29’s actual margin is $\psi = 0.627$, taking the untailored wing’s boundary and multiplying it by the 2.667 established from the inversion. That comes to roughly five eighths of the theoretical maximum, a large fraction of a hard physical bound to spend on one requirement.

Second, there is a value of coupling beyond which the wing does not diverge at any speed. At $\psi = 0.812$ the positive root disappears, as it does under sufficient sweepback. The technology does not merely raise the boundary. It can remove it.

Whether That Number Survives the Assumptions

The required coupling was computed with unpublished stiffnesses, so the obvious objection is that it is an artefact of the assumption. It is not, and the reason follows.

The boundary scales linearly with the overall stiffness level, so the required $\psi$ is completely independent of it. Only the ratio $GJ/EI$ can matter, and across a wide range of that ratio the answer moves very little.

$GJ/EI$ Required $\psi$ $\psi$ eliminating divergence
0.15 0.790 0.921
0.30 0.627 0.813
0.50 0.607 0.795
0.80 0.645 0.827

Across a factor of more than five in the stiffness ratio the required coupling stays between 0.61 and 0.79. The conclusion that the X-29’s wing needed most of the coupling physically available to a laminate is therefore robust to the one thing that had to be assumed, and the model with two free parameters has demonstrated something only because the answer barely depends on them.

The cluster on aeroelastic tailoring and bend-twist coupling, under The Contemporary Literature, holds the research records on this question.

The Southwell Method, Used in Flight for the First Time

The most striking thing in the primary flight record is not a number but a technique.

A divergence boundary cannot be located by flying to it. The X-29 team instead used the Southwell method, which extracts a critical value from measurements taken well below it. For a structure carrying an initial imperfection $\theta_0$ the twist under load follows

\[\theta(q) = \theta_0 \frac{q/q_D}{1 - q/q_D} \tag{36}\]

which rearranges into a straight line.

\[\frac{\theta}{q} = \frac{1}{q_D}\theta + \frac{\theta_0}{q_D} \tag{37}\]

The slope is recovered by least squares over the measured points, and the boundary is its reciprocal.

\[\hat{m} = \frac{\sum_i (\theta_i - \bar{\theta})(y_i - \bar{y})}{\sum_i (\theta_i - \bar{\theta})^2}, \qquad y_i = \frac{\theta_i}{q_i}, \qquad \hat{q}_D = \frac{1}{\hat{m}} \tag{38}\]

Plotting $\theta/q$ against $\theta$ gives a line whose slope is the reciprocal of the divergence dynamic pressure. The X-29A generated the data from constant-altitude windup turns and pushover-pullup manoeuvres, using both strain-gauge loads and twist from the flight deflection measurement system. The preliminary flight assessment notes that although this was the first application of the Southwell technique to flight test data, it had been used previously to analyse wind tunnel data. [Hicks and Matheny 1987]

The report also records that the resulting estimate was sensitive to a number of factors including measurement uncertainties, manoeuvre technique, aerodynamic phenomena, and strain gauge loads measurement stations, and does not say how sensitive [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. That is computable.

The lever arm of the fit is the spread in twist across the data, and the twist grows sharply only as the boundary is approached. An aircraft that can reach just over a third of the way to divergence therefore has very little of it.

Reach $q/q_D$ Twist lever, multiples of $\theta_0$ Median error Ninetieth percentile
0.20 0.22 6.66 percent 16.21 percent
0.30 0.39 3.94 percent 9.48 percent
0.375 0.55 2.77 percent 6.79 percent
0.50 0.93 1.63 percent 4.06 percent
0.70 2.24 0.68 percent 1.65 percent
0.85 5.55 0.28 percent 0.66 percent

Those figures assume two percent noise on the twist measurement. The X-29A sat at 0.375 on that table at its design point, so the geometry of its envelope put it near the fragile end. Holding the reach fixed there and varying the measurement quality instead gives the sensitivity the report describes.

Twist measurement noise Median error in $q_D$ Ninetieth percentile
1 percent 1.40 percent 3.44 percent
2 percent 2.77 percent 6.79 percent
5 percent 6.95 percent 16.44 percent
10 percent 13.89 percent 31.79 percent
20 percent 26.35 percent 48.93 percent

The error in the estimated boundary is very close to a fixed multiple of the measurement error, at about 1.4 times it. This gives the report’s warning its quantitative content. A five percent error in twist becomes a seven percent error in the divergence boundary, and at the amplification rates tabulated earlier a seven percent error in the boundary is a large error in the loads.

The method is sound and the flight application was a genuine first [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. What limited it was that the aircraft could not fly close enough to the thing it was trying to measure, which is the same difficulty in a different form.

Records on the method’s flight use and on the wing it measured fall in the clusters on the X-29 and forward-swept wing aircraft and on aeroelastic tailoring and bend-twist coupling.

Dependent Systems

The Wing Structure

The wing skins are graphite-epoxy composite, upper and lower, and the flight assessment is explicit that they exist to aeroelastically tailor the wing deflection and inhibit wing structural divergence [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. The mechanism is stated as proper ply orientation producing bend-twist coupling combined with high material stiffness properties to minimise the natural washin tendencies under load [Sims et al. 1989].

The structural axis is swept further forward than the planform, and the difference is not small.

\[\Lambda_{\mathrm{struct}} - \Lambda_{LE} = 36.2^\circ - 29.3^\circ = 6.9^\circ \tag{39}\]

Because divergence is governed by the elastic axis, the wing is aeroelastically almost seven degrees more forward-swept than it appears, and the closed-form root above depends on the sine of the larger angle.

The amplification applies to the loads as well as to the lift, so it binds the structure and is more than an aerodynamic curiosity.

\[\frac{M_{\mathrm{root}}^{\mathrm{elastic}}}{M_{\mathrm{root}}^{\mathrm{rigid}}} \;\geq\; \frac{1}{1 - q/q_D} = 1.6 \quad \text{at the design point} \tag{40}\]

The inequality runs that way because washin loads the tip preferentially, moving the centre of pressure outboard and lengthening the lever arm, so the bending moment grows by at least the lift amplification and in general by more.

The same report is equally explicit that the cure was partial. Even so, it adds, the aeroelastic properties remain significantly adverse, and the elastic-to-rigid ratio of 1.6 quantifies that sentence [Sims et al. 1989]. The wing was not made to behave like an aft-swept wing. It was made to diverge far enough outside the envelope to be flyable, and it still amplified its lift by sixty percent at the design point.

The structural box transitions from unswept inboard to swept constant chord lines outboard, and the four load measurement stations were oriented to place the torsion axes midway through the box. Eighteen strain gauge bridges were installed at each station, some of them on the composite itself, and the record notes that equation accuracies were typical of Dryden’s experience with conventional all-metallic structures, a quietly significant result about instrumenting composites at all [Sims et al. 1989].

The span load distribution was expected to be unconventional, particularly in the inboard region because of the strong canard downwash [Sims et al. 1989], the first appearance of a theme that recurs across the aircraft. The canard and the wing cannot be analysed separately.

The survey places the literature on composite wing structure in the cluster on composite structures, damage and certification.

The Flight Control System

A thirty-five percent negative static margin translates into time.

The unstable airframe’s pitch response splits into two real roots, one of them positive, and the positive root sets how long the aircraft takes to double a disturbance. Neglecting pitch damping, which errs toward less available time,

\[M_\alpha = \frac{q\,S\,\bar{c}\,C_{m_\alpha}}{I_{yy}}, \qquad t_2 = \frac{\ln 2}{\sqrt{M_\alpha}} \tag{41}\]

The lift-curve slope in the table below is not quoted anywhere in the record and is estimated from the planform by the standard low-aspect-ratio relation, which follows Etkin and Stevens and Lewis.

\[C_{L_\alpha} = \frac{2\pi A}{2 + \sqrt{\dfrac{A^2\beta^2}{\eta^2}\left(1 + \dfrac{\tan^2\Lambda_{c/2}}{\beta^2}\right) + 4}}, \qquad \beta^2 = 1 - M^2 \tag{42}\]

At Mach 0.9 that returns 5.037 per radian, and the pitching moment derivative follows from the static margin.

\[C_{m_\alpha} = -C_{L_\alpha}\,\mathrm{SM} = -5.037 \times (-0.35) = 1.763 \tag{43}\]

A positive pitching moment derivative is the source of the aircraft’s difficulty, because it means a disturbance in angle of attack produces a moment that increases it.

Here $C_{m_\alpha} = -C_{L_\alpha} \cdot \mathrm{SM}$, so that a negative static margin makes the pitching moment derivative positive and the root real.

The pitch inertia was never published and is assumed, bracketed between 35,000 and 60,000 slug square feet, which spans the range for aircraft of this size and mass. Every figure below carries that assumption.

Mach Altitude, ft $q$, lb/ft² $t_2$, ms Frames at 40 Hz
0.4 40,000 43.9 602 24.1
0.4 20,000 108.9 382 15.3
0.4 0 237.0 259 10.4
0.6 20,000 245.1 247 9.9
0.6 0 533.3 167 6.7
0.8 20,000 435.7 175 7.0
0.8 0 948.0 119 4.7
0.9 20,000 551.4 149 6.0
0.9 0 1,199.8 101 4.0

At the corner of the envelope the aircraft doubles a pitch disturbance in a tenth of a second, and at the low inertia bracket in 77 milliseconds. The controller gets four frames in which to notice and act, and at the low bracket rather closer to three.

The lift-curve estimate draws on the literature in the cluster on lift, induced drag and aerodynamic estimation.

Two Doubling Times That Are Easy to Confuse

The figure above is the doubling time of an established exponential. A disturbance released from rest with zero pitch rate does not follow an exponential, because both roots are excited, and the response is a hyperbolic cosine.

\[\alpha(t) = \alpha_0 \cosh\left(\lambda t\right), \qquad \lambda = \sqrt{M_\alpha} = 6.861\ \mathrm{s^{-1}} \tag{44}\]

The two doubling times therefore differ by a fixed factor.

\[t_2^{\exp} = \frac{\ln 2}{\lambda} = 0.101\ \mathrm{s}, \qquad t_2^{\cosh} = \frac{\operatorname{arcosh} 2}{\lambda} = 0.192\ \mathrm{s} \tag{45}\] \[\frac{t_2^{\cosh}}{t_2^{\exp}} = \frac{\operatorname{arcosh} 2}{\ln 2} = 1.900 \tag{46}\]

A factor of 1.900 is large enough to read as a real discrepancy if the two are mixed up, and this article uses the exponential figure, the conservative one, throughout.

That number should be set against the delay the controller itself introduces. A zero-order hold contributes half a sample on average and the computation contributes whole frames, so

\[\tau_{\mathrm{eff}} = \frac{0.5 + n_{\mathrm{compute}}}{f_s} = \frac{1.5}{40\ \mathrm{Hz}} = 37.5\ \mathrm{ms} \tag{47}\]

The same rate sets a ceiling on what the loop can see at all, and a lag that grows with frequency.

\[f_{\mathrm{Nyquist}} = \frac{f_s}{2} = 20\ \mathrm{Hz} \tag{48}\] \[\varphi = 360^\circ f \tau_{\mathrm{eff}} \tag{49}\]
Frequency Phase lag from 37.5 ms
0.5 Hz 6.75°
1.0 Hz 13.50°
2.0 Hz 27.00°
5.0 Hz 67.50°

Thirty-seven and a half milliseconds of the aircraft’s 101 millisecond doubling time is consumed by the act of sampling. The ratio makes the case for forty hertz without any appeal to a specification, and it explains why the primary literature quotes the update rate as though it were a design feature and not an implementation detail. It was a design feature.

The survey treats sampled-data delay in the cluster on sampled-data control and time delay.

Redundancy Measured Against the Same Clock

Triplex redundancy with majority voting tolerates one channel failure. The probability that fewer than two of three independent channels survive follows the binomial.

\[P_{\mathrm{loss}} = \sum_{k=0}^{1} \binom{3}{k}(1-p)^k p^{3-k} \tag{50}\]
Per-channel failure probability Triplex loss Simplex loss Improvement
10⁻³ 3.00 × 10⁻⁶ 10⁻³ 334
10⁻⁴ 3.00 × 10⁻⁸ 10⁻⁴ 3,334
10⁻⁵ 3.00 × 10⁻¹⁰ 10⁻⁵ 33,334

Voting arithmetic is the easy half of the redundancy argument, and it does not bind. Voting requires detecting and isolating a failed channel, and that takes frames, which the airframe does not have many of.

\[\frac{\Delta t_{\mathrm{isolate}}}{t_2} = \frac{n_{\mathrm{frames}}/f_s}{t_2} \tag{51}\]
Frames to isolate Fraction of a doubling time consumed
1 24.7 percent
2 49.5 percent
3 74.2 percent
5 123.7 percent

A voter that needs five frames to isolate a failure has spent more than one doubling time doing it, by which point the disturbance it was protecting against has grown beyond the authority available to correct it. Redundancy management on this aircraft was a real-time problem rather than a reliability problem, and that inversion is one of the transferable results of the programme.

The system carried three flight modes, the normal digital mode as prime, with digital reversion and analog reversion below it, each having an up-and-away and a power-approach configuration, and extensive gain scheduling in every mode except the two reversionary power-approach cases [Hicks and Matheny 1987].

Three clusters under The Contemporary Literature cover this ground, on handling qualities and pilot-vehicle interaction, on digital fly-by-wire, redundancy and fault tolerance, and on flight control law design.

A Canard Boundary Set by the Control Loop

The single most interesting structural fact about this aircraft is that its canard was also divergence prone, and that a control law requirement fixed the structural boundary.

An all-moving surface on a torsional spring diverges when the aerodynamic moment about its axis overcomes the spring.

\[q_{D,\mathrm{surface}} = \frac{K_\theta}{e\,S\,a} \tag{52}\]

The structural loads report places the canard’s torsion axis about midway between the 25 percent and 50 percent mean aerodynamic chord points, chosen to balance subsonic against supersonic hinge moments, and describes that location in as many words as not conservatively located from a divergence viewpoint. It then states the fact that defines this aircraft. The pitch-loop stiffness required for control system stability resulted in a predicted divergence boundary that was well beyond that for the wing. [Sims et al. 1989]

The spring is not only the spindle. It is the spindle in series with the actuator, and through the actuator with the flight control system’s pitch loop. A stiffness bought to make the control law stable turned out to be the stiffness that kept the surface from diverging.

\[K_\theta^{\mathrm{req}} = q_D\,e\,S_c\,a, \qquad e = \left(x_{\mathrm{axis}} - x_{ac}\right)\bar{c}_c \tag{53}\]

Inverting the relation for the loop stiffness that would place the canard’s boundary at the wing’s 4,533 pounds per square foot gives the scale of what was required.

Torsion axis, percent of mean aerodynamic chord Moment arm, ft Required stiffness, 10⁶ ft·lb/rad
30.0 0.274 0.289
37.5 0.686 0.723
45.0 1.097 1.156
50.0 1.371 1.445

Moving the axis from thirty percent to fifty percent of the chord multiplies the required stiffness by five, because the moment arm grows from a quarter of a foot to nearly a foot and a half. The record’s remark that the chosen location was a major tradeoff is therefore an understatement of the sensitivity rather than of the difficulty [Sims et al. 1989].

Canard free play was tracked as a major concern throughout [Sims et al. 1989], which follows directly. Free play is a region of zero stiffness, and a spring with a dead band in it has no stiffness at all near the origin.

Research on the interaction of control loops with structural modes is collected in the cluster on aeroservoelasticity and structural mode control.

Trim and the Case for Putting the Surface in Front

The static margin is the distance from the centre of gravity to the neutral point, measured in mean aerodynamic chords, and it is negative when the neutral point lies ahead.

\[\mathrm{SM} = \frac{x_{np} - x_{cg}}{\bar{c}} = -0.35 \tag{54}\]

A supercritical section carries a large nose-down pitching moment about its aerodynamic centre, the price of its aft loading. That moment must be trimmed at every flight condition, and the sign of the load that trims it is the core of the argument for a canard.

The moment balance uses the surface’s own lift coefficient against the tail volume coefficient, which is defined as

\[V_H = \frac{S_s}{S}\cdot\frac{l}{\bar{c}} \tag{55}\] \[C_{L_{\mathrm{surface}}} V_H = -C_{m_{ac}} \tag{56}\]

The quantity that enters the drag comparison, however, is the lift the surface contributes referenced to the wing, which is $C_{L_{\mathrm{surface}}} S_s / S$. Substituting the volume coefficient,

\[\Delta C_L = -\frac{C_{m_{ac}}}{l/\bar{c}} \tag{57}\]

and the surface area cancels completely. The trim increment depends only on the aerofoil’s moment and the moment arm. That deserves emphasis, because it is easy to carry the surface’s own lift coefficient into the comparison as though it were already wing-referenced, and doing so inflates the trim load by the inverse area ratio, a factor of five for this aircraft.

At a canard arm of 1.75 mean aerodynamic chords and an area ratio of 0.20, giving a volume coefficient of 0.35, and taking the section moment as assumed at $-0.10$,

\[\Delta C_L = \frac{0.10}{1.75} = 0.0571 \tag{58}\]

The induced drag both configurations pay follows the usual relation, with the wing carrying whatever the trimming surface does not.

\[C_{D_i} = \frac{C_L^2}{\pi A e} = k\,C_L^2, \qquad k = \frac{1}{\pi A e} = \frac{1}{\pi \times 4.0 \times 0.85} = 0.0936 \tag{59}\]

Evaluating both configurations at the same total lift coefficient of 0.8, so that the comparison is fair, the wing carries 0.743 with a canard and 0.857 with an aft tail, and the induced drag follows the square.

\[\frac{C_{D_i}^{\mathrm{tail}}}{C_{D_i}^{\mathrm{canard}}} = \left(\frac{0.857}{0.743}\right)^2 = 1.331 \tag{60}\]

Trimming with a down load costs about a third more induced drag than trimming with an up load, at this moment and this arm. Neither was published, so both deserve a sensitivity table.

Section moment $C_{m_{ac}}$ Arm, mean aerodynamic chords Surface $C_L$ Wing-referenced $\Delta C_L$ Drag ratio
−0.05 1.50 0.167 0.0333 1.181
−0.05 1.75 0.143 0.0286 1.154
−0.05 2.50 0.100 0.0200 1.105
−0.10 1.50 0.333 0.0667 1.397
−0.10 1.75 0.286 0.0571 1.331
−0.10 2.50 0.200 0.0400 1.222
−0.15 1.50 0.500 0.1000 1.653
−0.15 1.75 0.429 0.0857 1.538
−0.15 2.50 0.300 0.0600 1.351

The advantage is real across the tabulated range and it is modest, running from about eleven percent to about sixty-five percent depending on how aft-loaded the section is and how long the arm. It is not the dominant term in the aircraft’s drag, and an article that presented the canard purely as a drag reduction device would be overstating a secondary effect.

The canard was truly close coupled to provide mutual interference with the wing aerodynamics, coplanar and without dihedral. The record states that canard lift due to angle of attack is approximately 1.5 times that due to canard incidence, and warns that any misprediction of these interference effects could have a large influence on the load distributions of both surfaces. [Sims et al. 1989]

The literature on trimming surfaces sits under The Contemporary Literature in the cluster on canards, trim and multiple lifting surfaces.

The Transonic Argument

The programme’s aerodynamic claim was a drag saving of up to thirteen percent for wings of the same aspect ratio, and the primary sources give a specific mechanism [Hicks and Huckabine 1989]. A forward-swept wing requires less leading-edge sweep for the same shock sweep and location. [Hicks and Matheny 1987]

That claim can be checked rather than repeated. An isobar lying at a constant chord fraction has a sweep interpolated between the two edges.

\[\tan\Lambda_{f} = \tan\Lambda_{LE} + f\left(\tan\Lambda_{TE} - \tan\Lambda_{LE}\right) \tag{61}\]

and the trailing edge sweep follows from the planform.

\[\tan\Lambda_{TE} = \tan\Lambda_{LE} - \frac{4}{A}\cdot\frac{1 - \lambda}{1 + \lambda} \tag{62}\]

For the X-29’s leading edge at 29.3 degrees forward, an aspect ratio of 4.0 and an assumed taper ratio of 0.4, the trailing edge sweeps 44.70 degrees forward, and the isobars sweep progressively more forward across the chord.

Chord fraction Isobar sweep
0 percent 29.30° forward
25 percent 33.76° forward
50 percent 37.79° forward
75 percent 41.43° forward
100 percent 44.70° forward

A forward-swept wing’s isobars are swept more than its leading edge, and an aft-swept wing’s are swept less, because the trailing edge moves in opposite directions in the two cases. The effects compound, and matching the isobar costs the aft-swept wing a great deal of leading-edge sweep.

\[\Lambda_{LE}^{\mathrm{aft}} = 44.70^\circ \quad \text{to match} \quad \Lambda_{50\%} = 37.79^\circ \tag{63}\]

The aft-swept wing needs 44.70 degrees of leading-edge sweep to achieve what the forward-swept wing achieves with 29.30, a difference of 15.40 degrees. The primary source’s claim is therefore correct and now has a number attached to it.

Sweep earns its keep by reducing the Mach number the section sees, and the isobar sweep governs that reduction rather than the leading-edge sweep.

\[M_n = M\cos\Lambda_{50\%} \tag{64}\]
Flight Mach Normal to the 50 percent isobar
0.90 0.711
1.07 0.846
1.48 1.170

At the design point of Mach 1.07 the section sees 0.846, which is subsonic, and keeping the normal Mach number subsonic is the purpose of sweeping a wing.

The structural consequence follows. Computing the box length between a fifteen percent front spar and a seventy percent rear spar for both planforms at equal isobar sweep gives 16.95 feet forward-swept against 17.48 feet aft-swept, a ratio of 0.969, so the forward-swept box is about three percent shorter.

A shorter box shortens the lever arm the root bending moment acts through.

\[M_{\mathrm{root}} = \tfrac{1}{2}n\,W\,\eta_{cp}\,\frac{b}{2} = \tfrac{1}{2} \times 8.0 \times 15{,}000 \times 0.4 \times 13.60\ \mathrm{ft} = 3.26 \times 10^{5}\ \mathrm{ft\,lb} \tag{65}\]

That comparison must be made at equal shock sweep and not at equal leading-edge sweep, and the difference between those two questions reverses the answer. At equal leading-edge sweep the same calculation gives 16.95 feet forward against 14.55 feet aft, making the forward-swept box the longer of the two. Both numbers are correct and they answer different questions. The one that bears on the programme’s claim is the first, because a wing is designed to a shock position rather than to a leading-edge angle.

The geometry establishes the mechanism and does not establish the saving. In flight at Mach 0.9 the aircraft showed greater shock losses than two of its three contemporaries [Saltzman et al. 1994], so the drag saving the planform was meant to buy did not appear in the airframe as built.

The contemporary records on this argument are in the clusters on transonic wing design and sweep and on flutter, gusts and very flexible aircraft.

Propulsion and the Rest

The engine is a single General Electric F404-GE-400 of the 16,000 pound class, mounted in the fuselage with two side-mounted fixed-geometry inlets optimised for transonic performance [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. Fixed geometry is the correct choice for an aircraft whose supersonic excursions are incidental to its purpose, and the inlets are one of the places where the programme declined to spend money on a technology it was not investigating.

Maximum takeoff gross weight is 17,800 pounds with 4,000 pounds of fuel in two fuselage and two strake tanks [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. Design symmetric load factors were 8 g subsonic and 6.5 g supersonic at a manoeuvre design gross weight of 15,000 pounds, and the record notes that gross weights flown ranged from about 14,800 to 17,700 pounds, the upper figure being an eighteen percent increase over the manoeuvre design gross weight [Sims et al. 1989].

The drag polar assumed for the sensitivity below is the ordinary parabolic one, and its maximum lift-to-drag ratio has a closed form.

\[C_D = C_{D_0} + k\,C_L^2, \qquad \left(\frac{L}{D}\right)_{\max} = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi A e}{C_{D_0}}}, \qquad C_L^{\mathrm{opt}} = \sqrt{\frac{C_{D_0}}{k}} \tag{66}\]

A drag polar is not published in a form that permits a clean lift-to-drag figure, but the sensitivity can still be tabulated for an aspect ratio of 4.0 and an assumed span efficiency of 0.85.

Assumed $C_{D_0}$ Maximum lift-to-drag At lift coefficient
0.020 11.56 0.462
0.024 10.55 0.506
0.028 9.77 0.547

The more interesting question for this aircraft is the sustained load factor, where thrust equals drag in a level turn.

\[\frac{T}{W} = \frac{q\,C_{D_0}}{W/S} + \frac{k\,(W/S)\,n^2}{q} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad n = \sqrt{\frac{q}{k\,(W/S)}\left(\frac{T}{W} - \frac{q\,C_{D_0}}{W/S}\right)} \tag{67}\]
Altitude Sustained load factor at Mach 0.9
Sea level 10.60
20,000 ft 8.10
40,000 ft 5.41

At sea level that exceeds the 8 g structural design limit, on the assumed polar and at the manoeuvre design weight, so at low altitude the airframe binds before the engine does. The result follows from the thrust-to-weight ratio computed at the top of the article exceeding unity at that weight.

Ten to eleven is an unremarkable figure for a fighter-sized aircraft of this aspect ratio, and the X-29’s aerodynamic interest was never in its cruise efficiency.

Performance work of this kind is surveyed in the cluster on manoeuvre performance, agility and energy methods.

Instrumentation

Six hundred and ninety-one measured parameters were telemetered to the ground, and the aircraft had no onboard recording capability at all, a striking design decision that made the telemetry link a single point of failure for the research product if not for the aircraft [Hicks and Matheny 1987].

The ten-bit remote-unit pulse-code modulation system sampled from 25 to 400 samples per second depending on the frequency range required [Hicks and Matheny 1987], with fourteen selected parameters raised to 200 or 400 when substantial buffet loads were encountered [Sims et al. 1989]. Those rates are chosen against the same criterion that governs the flight control system, and the range from 25 to 400 samples per second corresponds to a usable band an order of magnitude wide.

\[f_{\max} \leq \frac{f_s}{2} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad 12.5\ \mathrm{Hz} \leq f_{\max} \leq 200\ \mathrm{Hz} \tag{68}\]

The structural modes the aeroservoelastic work needed to see lie inside that band, and the fourteen parameters raised to the top of it were raised for buffet loads [Sims et al. 1989].

A constant-bandwidth frequency modulation system handled high-response acceleration and vibration data. The flight deflection measurement system supplied the wing twist that the Southwell analysis depended on, so the keystone result depends on that instrument [Hicks and Matheny 1987].

Records on the aircraft’s instrumentation and test methods appear under The Contemporary Literature, in the clusters on high angle of attack and vortex flow and on flight test, instrumentation and identification.

The Flight Test Record

Two aircraft flew, and they flew a divided programme.

The first X-29A made its first flight on 14 December 1984 and carried the envelope expansion and the performance work. The second flew from 1989 and carried the high angle of attack investigation [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Gelzer 2015]. The record of how many flights each made is not consistent across sources [Gelzer 2015] [Jenkins, Landis and Miller] [Grumman X-29], and the source base below reports the disagreement without resolving it.

The envelope expansion itself is precisely documented. The primary record states that expansion of the aircraft’s one-g and manoeuvre flight envelopes was completed over a two-year period in 84 flights [Hicks and Matheny 1987], a slow rate by the standards of the aircraft in this series and an appropriate one for an airframe whose failure modes included a structural instability with no natural limit.

The overall verdict in the primary literature is favourable and is stated without hedging. Flight results confirmed the viability of the aircraft design, good agreement with preflight predictions was obtained, and the individual technologies’ operational workability and performance were confirmed [Hicks and Matheny 1987].

What Was Measured

Four of the measured things need separating, because they did not all succeed equally [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Sims et al. 1989].

  • The static loads distribution, from four wing stations and the canard, with eighteen strain gauge bridges per station.
  • The structural dynamic characteristics, from natural turbulence, control surface raps and a frequency-sweep flaperon exciter.
  • The flight control system characteristics, across three modes and two configurations.
  • The aerodynamic performance, meaning the drag polar shape above minimum parasite drag.

The drag polar work was compromised by instrumentation rather than by the aircraft. Polar shape data could only be obtained subsonically, because a lack of afterburner fuel flow instrumentation prevented the calculation of accurate afterburner thrust in supersonic flight. Further difficulties arose in the angle-of-attack calibration and from manoeuvre dynamics effects caused by being off the optimum wing camber schedule. The engine was not thrust-calibrated, and a thrust-calibrated engine was planned for the follow-on phase [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Hicks and Huckabine 1989].

The admission is honest and unusual for a programme report, and it means the aircraft’s supersonic drag, where the forward-swept wing’s transonic argument would have been most directly testable, was not measured during this phase at all [Hicks and Huckabine 1989]. The later lift and drag report, using a thrust-calibrated engine, extended the data to Mach 1.3 [Saltzman et al. 1994].

Comparison With Ground Prediction

Four comparisons are available in the primary record and they do not all point the same way.

The Subsonic Drag Polar Beat Its Prediction

Induced drag levels were as much as twenty percent less than wind tunnel estimates, particularly at lift coefficients above 0.8, and the basic subsonic drag polar shapes met or exceeded wind-tunnel-based predictions [Hicks and Huckabine 1989] [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. The same report found the opposite at Mach 0.95 and low lift, where the flight drag exceeded prediction by up to twenty percent as the lift coefficient fell toward zero [Hicks and Huckabine 1989].

Beating its prediction is a different finding from beating other aircraft. The preliminary report compared polar shapes with other modern fighters and credited the X-29A with the better overall Oswald efficiency factor for the same aspect ratio [Hicks and Huckabine 1989]. The later and fuller lift and drag report, covering Mach 0.4 to 1.3, found the subsonic Oswald factor about average for a cantilever monoplane, and at Mach 0.6 found the lift-to-drag ratio and lifting efficiency about the same as those of the F-15C, F-16C and F/A-18. It also judged the 185 square foot reference area too small for force coefficients to be compared across aircraft, and made its serious comparisons only with quantities free of that area [Saltzman et al. 1994].

At Mach 0.9, where the transonic argument should have shown, the comparison went against the aircraft. At a load factor of 2 the F-16C and F/A-18 had lift-to-drag ratios about one unit higher than the X-29A. The authors judged that the X-29A suffered greater shock losses, probably caused in large part by the actuator fairings and hinges under its wing, and at supersonic speeds they found its lift-related drag high against all three contemporaries, which they believed was caused by high trim drag [Saltzman et al. 1994].

A twenty percent overprediction of induced drag by a tunnel is a large error in the conservative direction, and it shows that the ground tools were pessimistic about this wing at subsonic lifting conditions. It does not show that the configuration had less drag than a conventional fighter, and the flight data taken together do not show that either. The agency history states that the programme did not demonstrate the overall drag reduction that earlier studies had suggested [Gelzer 2015].

The Divergence Boundary Was Worse Than Predicted

Preliminary results indicated a lower divergence speed than predicted, though the boundary was still outside the flight envelope [Hicks and Matheny 1987].

This finding matters most and needs careful statement. The prediction was optimistic about the single quantity the aircraft existed to demonstrate. The margin survived, the aeroplane was never in danger, and the technology was vindicated. But the ground analysis was wrong in the direction that costs margin rather than the direction that wastes it, and the loads analysis had framed the underlying risk in terms that anticipate this. Errors in the predicted load distributions or stiffness characteristics could lead to greater load amplifications and a lower divergence boundary for a forward-swept-wing design. [Sims et al. 1989]

The programme predicted its own failure mode correctly and then experienced a mild version of it.

The Canard Loads Were Worse Than Predicted

Canard torsion loads were consistently higher than predicted at transonic Mach numbers, especially at high dynamic pressure, and were highly sensitive to sideslip angle. The report adds that the difference between the flight test data and the predictions is not fully understood and was still under investigation [Hicks and Matheny 1987].

This is the surface whose divergence boundary the control loop set, and the torsion loads are the second independent sign that the canard was the least well predicted part of the aircraft. The warning quoted earlier, that any misprediction of the canard-wing interference could have a large influence on the load distributions of both surfaces, turned out to be the right thing to have worried about.

The Buffet and Control System Interacted

A separate body of the flight record concerns buffet-induced structural and flight control system interaction, and an in-flight interaction of the canard and the flight control system significant enough to be the subject of its own report [Voracek and Clarke 1991] [Kehoe et al. 1990].

An aeroservoelastic interaction occurs when a structure and a control law that were designed separately meet. For an aircraft whose canard stiffness was partly supplied by its pitch loop, the appearance of one is close to inevitable, and its appearance in the flight record is the clearest possible evidence that the structure and the control law were a single system rather than two.

The survey follows this interaction into the cluster on flutter, gusts and very flexible aircraft.

What the Data Changed

The X-29’s forward-swept wing was never adopted, and the aircraft’s influence ran through everything except its most visible feature.

No forward-swept fighter has entered series production since, the Su-47 having remained a prototype, and the moderate forward sweep of some sailplanes and light aircraft serves visibility and spar placement rather than high-speed performance [Forward-swept wing]. The configuration’s aerodynamic case was modest, since the programme did not demonstrate the overall drag reduction that earlier studies had suggested [Gelzer 2015] and the flight data showed no lift-to-drag advantage over contemporary fighters [Saltzman et al. 1994], its structural case depended on a technology that had other uses, and advances in thrust vectoring and a shift toward medium-range missile engagements reduced its relevance to fighter design [Forward-swept wing]. The planform lost.

What won was everything the planform forced.

  • Aeroelastic tailoring became ordinary. The technique that kept the X-29’s wing inside its boundary is now applied to wings that are not forward-swept at all, for load alleviation, flutter margin and weight, and the design literature that supports it is large [Aeroelastic tailoring of transport aircraft wings].
  • Flying a deeply unstable airframe became ordinary. Thirty-five percent negative static margin was extreme in 1984 and the practice of designing around relaxed static stability is now unremarkable [Relaxed stability].
  • Real-time redundancy management became a recognised discipline. The insight that failure detection and isolation must be fast compared with the airframe’s divergence time, as well as reliable, transfers to every unstable aircraft.

The aircraft’s most transferable finding is the one it did not set out to make, namely that a structure and a control law for an unstable airframe cannot be specified independently. The canard’s divergence boundary being set by pitch-loop stiffness is a small fact with a large generalisation behind it.

Under The Contemporary Literature, the cluster on relaxed static stability and the unstable airframe carries this line of work forward.

The Run of Four Purchased Designations Ends Here

The pattern named across the last four articles stops with this one, and the stopping is itself evidence.

  • X-25, a civil autogyro design ordered in modified form to investigate a rescue concept.
  • X-26, a commercially available sailplane bought twice, for training and for quiet observation.
  • X-27, a manufacturer’s private-venture export fighter that was never built at all.
  • X-28, a homebuilt sport flying boat bought off a private individual for five thousand dollars.
  • X-29, an aircraft designed and built to answer a question that could not be answered any other way.

Three of the first four already existed and were bought for properties they already had. The X-27 never existed. The fifth had to be created.

The X-series was established for aircraft like the X-29. A government agency identified a question, funded a purpose-built aeroplane, built two of them, flew them for years, and published the result [Gelzer 2015]. That the series could still do this in 1984, after a decade in which the designation had been applied to catalogue purchases and unbuilt proposals, is a fact about the institution, not the aircraft.

This article does not claim the four before it were misuse. Evaluating an existing aircraft against a requirement is research and it produced answers. The observation is narrower. The designation had become capable of meaning either thing, and which one it meant in a given year depended on who was paying rather than on any property of the aircraft. That observation joins the evidence the closing article of this series assembles, and it now has a run of four followed by a clean break behind it.

The Contemporary Literature

Cluster Records
Flight control law design 329
Flutter, gusts and very flexible aircraft 305
Digital fly-by-wire, redundancy and fault tolerance 274
Composite structures, damage and certification 263
Aeroservoelasticity and structural mode control 192
Handling qualities and pilot-vehicle interaction 176
The X-29 and forward-swept wing aircraft 175
Transonic wing design and sweep 153
High angle of attack and vortex flow 145
Morphing and adaptive structures 123
Aerostructural and aerodynamic design optimisation 118
Flight test, instrumentation and identification 107
Aeroelastic tailoring and bend-twist coupling 104
Divergence and static aeroelasticity 95
Sampled-data control and time delay 91
Canards, trim and multiple lifting surfaces 88
Structural mechanics, buckling and structural weight 83
Machine learning and data-driven modelling 81
Lift, induced drag and aerodynamic estimation 64
Relaxed static stability and the unstable airframe 62
Structural health monitoring and the digital twin 51
Topology optimisation and additive manufacture 41
Uncertainty quantification and reliability 35
The Southwell method, Rayleigh-Ritz and assumed modes 28
Manoeuvre performance, agility and energy methods 18
Total 3,201

The bodies of work in the sections before this one are the ones the argument sits inside. This section reviews what has happened since. The table above counts the research records in each cluster of the survey, the review subsections that follow read the literature against the aircraft, and the clusters themselves close the section.

The short version is that the X-29’s two answers went in opposite directions. The planform is a historical curiosity and the techniques it forced are now everywhere.

Aeroelastic tailoring outlived the wing that needed it

Tailoring is now a design variable rather than a rescue. The X-29 used bend-twist coupling to cancel a destabilising aerodynamic coupling, which is the hardest case. Contemporary work uses the same mechanism for gust load alleviation, for flutter margin, for manoeuvre load control and for structural weight, on wings whose sweep creates no divergence problem at all.

The change is in the optimisation framing. The X-29’s laminate was designed to satisfy a constraint. Modern practice treats ply orientation as a continuous design variable inside a multidisciplinary optimisation, which makes the question not whether a coupling is achievable but what it is worth.

The cluster on aeroelastic tailoring and bend-twist coupling below gathers these records.

Very flexible aircraft made the X-29’s problem general

The X-29 was a stiff aircraft with an inconvenient coupling. The contemporary problem is aircraft that are not stiff at all. High-aspect-ratio wings for efficiency, and the extreme case of solar-powered high-altitude platforms, deform enough that the rigid-body and elastic degrees of freedom cannot be separated.

That dissolves the distinction the X-29 was designed around. Its static divergence analysis treated the wing as elastic and the aircraft as rigid, although the programme also predicted and monitored body freedom flutter, a coupling of the wing’s first bending mode with the short-period mode that was expected to act as a precursor to static divergence [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. The modern formulation abandons the separation, and body freedom flutter, which appears in the nomenclature list of the X-29 reports, is the canonical example.

Its records are in the cluster on flutter, gusts and very flexible aircraft below.

Control of unstable airframes became a solved problem and then a harder one

Nothing in the contemporary literature would regard a thirty-five percent negative static margin as remarkable, the clearest measure of what the programme settled. What has replaced it is the question of doing the same thing with guarantees.

The X-29’s control law was gain-scheduled, a family of linear designs stitched together. Contemporary work asks for robustness certificates across the whole envelope, for adaptive laws that retain stability proofs, and for control allocation across redundant surfaces of the kind the X-29 had three of. The X-29 has served as a benchmark for this work. An adaptive augmentation study takes its lateral and directional dynamics as the test case because they are difficult, in Griffin et al. 2010, and procedures for optimising its handling qualities and for closed-loop control of its forebody vortices appear in Bosworth and Cox 1989 and Valasek and Downing 1995.

The records for this subsection fall in three clusters below, on flight control law design, on digital fly-by-wire, redundancy and fault tolerance, and on relaxed static stability and the unstable airframe.

Aeroservoelasticity became its own discipline

The interaction the X-29 encountered in flight now has a name, a literature and a place in the design process. Structural modes inside the control bandwidth, notch filters that trade stability against delay, and the fact that a delay bought to suppress a structural mode is a delay taken from an unstable airframe’s budget. The X-29 met the first of them in flight, when a canard pitch-mode response was aliased by the digital sampling of the canard-position feedback loop [Kehoe et al. 1990].

The research records on this subject are gathered below in the cluster on aeroservoelasticity and structural mode control.

High angle of attack aerodynamics

The second X-29A was devoted to high angle of attack work, and vortex flow control was tested on it [Gelzer 2015] [Hancock and Fullerton 1992]. Contemporary work has moved from characterising the flow to controlling it, with active flow control, and the computational methods that were merely supporting evidence for the X-29 now carry the prediction.

See the cluster on high angle of attack and vortex flow below.

Composite structures and how they are certified

The X-29’s wing skins were an early large primary composite structure on a research aircraft, and the record’s remark that strain-gauge equation accuracies on composite were typical of experience with metal is a small early data point in a large modern subject [Sims et al. 1989].

The certification literature is listed below in the cluster on composite structures, damage and certification.

Transonic wing design is computed now

The Grumman K Mod 2 section was developed for a design competition [Hicks and Huckabine 1989]. Its modern equivalent is produced by optimisation against a computational model, and the shock position that the X-29’s planform argument was built around is now an output rather than an input.

Two clusters below hold this work, on transonic wing design and sweep and on aerostructural and aerodynamic design optimisation.

Handling qualities of augmented aircraft

The X-29’s flying qualities were the flying qualities of its control law, as is true of every modern combat aircraft, and in 1984 the point was still novel enough to need saying. The equivalent-system criteria and the treatment of control system time delay that the contemporary literature uses were being worked out in the same decade [Bischoff 1983] [Berry et al. 1982].

The cluster on handling qualities and pilot-vehicle interaction, below, lists the records.

Five Subjects That Were Not Fields in 1984

The sections above track what happened to bodies of work the X-29 was part of. The five that follow are different. They are subjects that barely existed when the aircraft flew and that now bear directly on the problems it was built to attack. They make up the more useful half of a survey.

Machine learning arrived in the middle of the problem

The X-29’s predictions came from wind tunnels and computation, and the gaps between them and flight are documented in this article. [Waggoner et al. 1986] [Waggoner and Bates 1989] Contemporary practice inserts a learned model at those points, for unsteady aerodynamic prediction, for reduced-order models of the flow, and for surrogate models that make an optimisation affordable.

The relevant question is no longer whether these models are accurate but whether they can be trusted inside a control loop. The X-29’s designers faced that question about their reduced-order models and answered it with a flight envelope and a great deal of instrumentation.

Below, the cluster on machine learning and data-driven modelling collects this literature.

Morphing structures are the tailoring idea carried further

Aeroelastic tailoring changes a wing’s response to load by fixing its internal geometry once. Morphing changes it while flying. The X-29’s automatic camber control, which scheduled the flaperons as a function of flight condition, is a coarse ancestor of this, and the reports’ description of it as discrete variable camber and as a low-cost alternative to smooth variable camber shows the designers knew which approximation they were making [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Sims et al. 1989].

Morphing research is gathered in the cluster on morphing and adaptive structures below.

The structure now carries a model of itself

The X-29A had 691 measured parameters and no onboard recording, so its divergence estimate could only be computed on the ground from telemetered data. [Hicks and Matheny 1987] The modern version of that arrangement keeps a structural model current against sensor data continuously, under the names structural health monitoring, model updating and digital twin.

The X-29’s Southwell analysis is a small early instance of the same idea, since it inferred a structural property the aircraft could not be flown to from measurements taken well below it.

The cluster on structural health monitoring and the digital twin holds the corresponding records.

Manufacture changed which shapes are affordable

Every structural choice in the X-29 was constrained by what could be laid up, machined or fastened in 1982. Additive manufacture and topology optimisation together relax that constraint, and the literature on designing for them rather than merely with them is substantial.

That literature appears below as the cluster on topology optimisation and additive manufacture.

Uncertainty became something computed rather than covered

Of the contemporary subjects, this one bears most directly on the X-29’s keystone.

The X-29 handled uncertainty in its divergence boundary the way its era did, with a margin. The margin was a factor of 2.667 in dynamic pressure, the flight data then indicated the real boundary was lower than predicted, and the margin absorbed the error [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. The margin was doing the work that a probability distribution does now.

Contemporary practice computes a probabilistic flutter or divergence margin, propagates uncertainty in stiffness and in the aerodynamic model through to the boundary, and states a confidence rather than a factor. Applied to this aircraft it would have answered the question the flight test could not, namely how much of the discrepancy between predicted and measured divergence speed was model error and how much was measurement error.

Probabilistic margins and reliability methods make up the cluster on uncertainty quantification and reliability below.

Flight control law design

Flight control law design for aircraft and unmanned vehicles, adaptive, robust and nonlinear, including dynamic inversion and envelope protection, together with the general control theory those laws rest on.

329 records. [A Generalization for Model 2020] [Acquatella B. et al. 2017] [Advanced Control Techniques 2023] [Aghababa 2018] [Aguilar-Ibañez 2016] [Ahmadian et al. 2025] [Ahmed and Chen 2021] [Ajel et al. 2021] [Alag and Kaufman 1975] [An et al. 2020] [Autenrieb 2025] [Autonomous Flight Control 2018] [Axten et al. 2024] [Balakrishnan 2000] [Banerjee 2019] [Banks 1988a] [Bao et al. 2025] [Bar-Shalom 1985] [Bar-Shalom 1989] [Bar-Shalom 1990] [Barabanov and Ortega 2017] [Bartoszewicz and Adamiak 2018] [Bastin et al. 2025] [Basu Roy and Bhasin 2019] [Benaddy et al. 2022] [Beppu and Curtiss 1966] [Bernstein 2000] [Bhatia et al. 2021] [Biezad and Chou 1993] [Binz et al. 2019] [Bottasso and Montinari 2015] [Bouadi and Mora-Camino 2018] [Bu et al. 2025] [Campbell and Terrell 1987] [Cao et al. 2017] [Castañeda and Gordillo 2019] [Julian L. Center 1975] [Chabir et al. 2017] [Chen and Holohan 2015] [Chen et al. 2019a] [Chen et al. 2025b] [Cheng et al. 2017] [Cheng et al. 2023] [Choi and Choi 2026] [Clark and LeTron 1989] [Clements 2016] [Cochran 2015] [Combined Flight Control/utility System 1974] [Coppin et al. 2018] [Craig 1965] [Crandall et al. 1973] [Cunis et al. 2020a] [D’Andrea 2003] [D’Andrea 2008] [Davanipour et al. 2017] [De Gaspari and Mantegazza 2024] [Deng et al. 2026a] [Devi 2019] [Dhiman et al. 2022] [Di Donato et al. 2017] [Di Francesco and Mattei 2016] [Di Rito and Schettini 2016] [Ding et al. 2025] [Dong et al. 2023] [Dukes 1970] [Elenchezhiyan and Kumar 2025] [Enns 2003] [Evald et al. 2023] [Fan et al. 2023] [Fardad and Bamieh 2006] [Feliu‐Batlle 2016] [Feroskhan and Go 2016] [Feroskhan and Go 2018] [Ferreres and Hardier 2017] [Feuer et al. 1977] [Filimonov et al. 2026] [Fleming and Kushner 1994] [Flight Sciences Lab INC Buffalo NY 1964] [Flores et al. 2025] [Franco et al. 2022] [Franklin 1993a] [Franklin et al. 1990] [Fresconi et al. 2014] [Furtat and Gushchin 2021] [Fuzzy Logic for Control 1991] [Gabrys et al. 2019] [Gainer 1963] [Galffy et al. 2019] [Gamagedara et al. 2024] [Gao et al. 2025] [Garrard and Low 1990] [Gibson 1999] [Glezer and Leonard 2012] [Goel and Roy 2021] [Gong et al. 2024] [González et al. 2020] [Govindaraj et al. 1979] [Greenberg and Sternfield 1944] [Gross et al. 2017] [Gruenwald et al. 2020] [Guo et al. 2020] [Guo et al. 2026] [Hai 2022] [Hallauer 1983] [Hamissi et al. 2019] [Hart 1956] [Heersink et al. 2022] [Heinrich et al. 2022] [Rediess 1976] [Hess and Peng 2018] [Hobbs et al. 2023] [Hodgins and Freeman 2025] [Hodgkinson 2017] [Hongyan and Xiaoyong 2026] [Horowitz et al. 1980] [How 2004] [Huang et al. 2023] [Huo et al. 2021] [Invernizzi and Lovera 2018] [Franklin 1993b] [Jeong et al. 2024] [Ji et al. 2024a] [Jia et al. 2023] [Jiang et al. 2024b] [Jianhong and Yanxiang 2026] [Jin et al. 2015] [Kai 2024] [Kamaletdinova and Romanov 2024] [Kassapakis and Warwick 1994] [Kazarin et al. 2021] [Kevrekidis 2002] [Khalaf et al. 2017] [Khankalantary et al. 2021] [Kim and Kim 2024] [Kim et al. 2016b] [Kim et al. 2019] [Klema 1981] [Konatala et al. 2024] [Kopecki 2021] [Krause et al. 1990] [L’Afflitto 2018] [L’Afflitto 2023] [L’Afflitto and Blackford 2018] [Lang et al. 2024] [Laub 1991] [Le 2026] [Lee 1977] [Lee et al. 2017] [Lepri et al. 2024] [Li and Sanfelice 2016] [Li et al. 2021b] [Li et al. 2022b] [Li et al. 2024f] [Li et al. 2025a] [Li et al. 2026a] [Li et al. 2026b] [Liang et al. 2025] [Lindsay and Jordan 1975] [Liu and Buss 2022] [Liu et al. 2016a] [Liu et al. 2018a] [Liu et al. 2021] [Liu et al. 2023e] [Liu et al. 2026c] [Liu et al. 2026d] [Lo 1978] [Lo 1979] [Lo 1980] [Lo 1981] [Long 2019] [Lu et al. 2015] [Lu et al. 2022] [Lu et al. 2025] [Ludeña Cervantes et al. 2020] [Lungu and Lungu 2015] [Luo et al. 2022] [Ma and Chen 2023] [Ma et al. 2025b] [Mahmood 2025] [Maity et al. 2019] [Marcus 1994] [McAllister and Esfahani 2025] [McEneaney 1999] [McIntosh et al. 2024] [McKillip 1987] [Meng et al. 2024] [Miles and Broughton 2017] [Mirtaba et al. 2022] [Mohseni and Bernstein 2024] [Mojallizadeh 2026] [Mukherjee and Halder 2017] [Mukherjee and Sinha 2017] [Newkirk 1979] [Nguyen et al. 2026] [Nield 1981] [Northrop Aircraft INC Hawthorne CA 1952] [Okumoto and Elsanker 1973] [Oland et al. 2016] [Ostheimer and Giguere 1963] [O’Donnell and Mohseni 2019] [O’Rourke et al. 2019] [Palframan et al. 2019] [Palkin and Zenchenko 2025] [Pan and Huang 2019] [Park and Oh 2017] [Park et al. 2017a] [Park et al. 2017b] [Park et al. 2024] [Park et al. 2025] [Patne et al. 2020] [Pollack and van Kampen 2023] [Pollack et al. 2026] [Prajapati and Prasad 2019] [Qi and Zhao 2020] [Qi et al. 2018] [Qu and Annaswamy 2016] [Radetskaya 2022] [Rafi et al. 2017] [Rahima et al. 2026] [Rath and Fichter 2020] [CHulin 2023] [Sinke 2022] [Ren et al. 2022] [Rigatos 2021] [Robust Controller Design Based 2016] [Rogalski 2018] [Rogalski et al. 2020] [Rogalski et al. 2021] [Rokhsaz and Selberg 1990] [Ronfle-Nadaud 2009] [Rong et al. 2022] [Rowley 2008] [Rustenburg 1972] [Sachan and Padhi 2020] [Saetti 2025a] [Salagame et al. 2025] [Salahudden et al. 2024] [Sang and Zhang 2022] [Sato et al. 2017] [Saviolo and Loianno 2023] [Schieni et al. 2024] [Schmeichel 1967] [Schmidt and Schierman 1990] [Schuet et al. 2017] [Schütte et al. 2018] [Shen and Chen 2023] [Shi et al. 2022] [Shi et al. 2025] [Shiota and Ohmori 2015] [Shtessel 2001] [Simon et al. 2017] [Sleptsov and Andrianova 2021] [Smith 1968] [Smith 1978] [Snyder et al. 2019] [Snyder et al. 2022] [Soltani et al. 2025] [Song and Huang 2022] [Spillman and Ridgely 1995] [Stefanello and Gründling 2016] [Stefanovski 2022] [Steinberg and Page 1998] [Stolarik 2007] [Subramanian et al. 2022] [Suikat et al. 1987] [Sultan 2026] [Sun and van Kampen 2021] [Sushchenko and Bezkorovainyi 2023] [Taherinezhad and Ramirez-Serrano 2023] [Tamaskani et al. 2026] [Tanveer and Ahmad 2023] [Tanyer et al. 2016] [Tao 2025] [Tao et al. 2016] [Thien and Kim 2018] [Thu and Gavrilov 2017] [Tingting et al. 2018] [Tipàn et al. 2020] [Tran and Nguyen 2022] [Trindade Nascimento and Cunha 2019] [Tsubakino and Saito 2020] [Tu et al. 2026] [K.А. 2023] [Wang and Li 2025] [Wang et al. 2015] [Wang et al. 2016b] [Wang et al. 2017a] [Wang et al. 2019d] [Wang et al. 2020c] [Wang et al. 2021c] [Wang et al. 2022c] [Wang et al. 2024b] [Wang et al. 2024c] [Wang et al. 2024a] [Wang et al. 2026e] [Wang et al. 2026a] [Webb and Rogers 2021] [Wei et al. 2020] [Weidemann and Leondes 1979] [Weiser et al. 2020] [Willsky 1984] [Willsky and Verghese 1984] [Willsky and Verghese 1985] [Wise et al. 1999] [Wood et al. 2019] [Wu et al. 2019] [Wu et al. 2021b] [Wu et al. 2024] [Xie and Zhao 2016] [Xiong et al. 2026b] [Xu et al. 2015c] [Xue et al. 2021] [Yang et al. 2018] [Yeo et al. 2015] [Yu et al. 2023] [Yuan and Li 2019] [Yuan et al. 2024] [Zhang and He 2026] [Zhang and Ran 2023] [Zhang et al. 2018d] [Zhang et al. 2018b] [Zhang et al. 2019a] [Zhang et al. 2020a] [Zhang et al. 2025c] [Zhou et al. 2022b] [Zhu et al. 2017b] [Zvonarev and Leont’ev 2025] [Çabuk 2026] [Калиновский 2016]

Flutter, gusts and very flexible aircraft

Flutter analysis and testing, gust response, panel flutter and the aeroelasticity of very flexible and high-aspect-ratio wings, with bridge and hydrofoil flutter kept for their shared mechanics.

305 records. [Abbas and Morgenthal 2016] [Abel et al. 1966] [Abichandani and Rosenberg 1952] [Abou-Kebeh et al. 2025] [Alizadeh et al. 2020] [An et al. 2017] [An et al. 2026] [Ang and Ng 2026] [Ang et al. 2024] [Arnold 1942] [Asgari and Kouchakzadeh 2016] [Badhurshah et al. 2024] [Bai et al. 2022] [Balunov et al. 2023] [Bartels and Stanford 2018] [Bennett et al. 1993] [Bennett et al. 1988] [Bergen and Arnold 1940] [Besch and Liu 1973] [Besch et al. 1976] [Bismarck-Nasr 1994] [Bolding and Stearman 1976] [Bondarenko and Shkolnyi 2024] [Boyd 1977] [Bras et al. 2022] [Brouwer and McNamara 2020] [Busan 1998] [Byreddy et al. 2003] [Thinesh and Harmin 2018] [Camacho et al. 2021] [Campagna et al. 2025b] [Candon et al. 2026] [Casey 1988] [Cavallaro et al. 2015] [Chajjed et al. 2024] [Chakravarthy et al. 2015] [Changchuan et al. 2018] [Chen and Li 2017] [Chen et al. 2017c] [Chen et al. 2018c] [Chen et al. 2019b] [Chen et al. 2020d] [Chen et al. 2025c] [Chiarelli and Bonomo 2019] [Chowdary et al. 1994] [Cid Montoya et al. 2018] [Cooper and Stroud 1972] [Crimi and Grace 1965] [Crimi and Ordway 1962] [Crittenden et al. 1978] [Crother et al. 1973] [Crouse and Leishman 1992] [Cunningham et al. 1988] [Cunningham et al. 1987] [Birdsall 1970] [Dagilis and Kilikevičius 2023] [Daniel de Almeida Pereira and Flávio Donizeti Marques 2015] [del Carre and Palacios 2020] [Deskos et al. 2020] [Dhital and Chouvion 2024] [Doggett et al. 1995] [Dowell and Hall 2003] [Duan and Zhang 2018] [Dugundji 1965] [Dugundji et al. 1962] [Eastep and Olsen 1980] [Ebrahimzade et al. 2016] [Eckhaus 1962] [Fang et al. 2020] [Farbridge et al. 1956] [Farhat 1998] [Farhat 2000] [Farhat 2001] [Farmer and Hanson 1976] [Farsadi et al. 2020] [Farsadi et al. 2024] [Fazilati and Khalafi 2019a] [Fedorenko and Bondarenko 2024] [Feldt and Herrmann 1974] [Flax 1943] [Freudinger 1989] [Freudinger and Kehoe 1990] [Fu et al. 2021] [Garrick and Rubinow 1946a] [Garrick and Rubinow 1946b] [Ghalandari et al. 2022] [Ghasemikaram et al. 2021] [Goizueta et al. 2022b] [Goland 1945] [Grauer and Boucher 2017] [Gray and Mei 1993] [Gray et al. 2023] [Greene 1928] [Grifò et al. 2023] [Gu and Zhou 2020] [Gu and Zhou 2022] [Guimarães et al. 2019] [Guimarães et al. 2020] [Guo et al. 2017b] [Gurley and Ruhlin 1962] [Guruswamy et al. 1987] [Haas and Chopra 1990] [Hao et al. 2022] [Hao et al. 2023] [Hao et al. 2026] [Henry 1961] [Hermanutz and Hornung 2020] [Herrmann et al. 1966] [Hilger and Ritter 2021] [Hitch 1978] [Hodges 2004] [Hoseini and Hodges 2019] [Housner and Stein 1974] [Huang et al. 2018] [Huang et al. 2024b] [Iannelli et al. 2017] [Iannelli et al. 2018] [Iovnovich et al. 2018] [Isogai 1979] [Isogai 1981] [Ji et al. 2021b] [Ji et al. 2024b] [Jianhong 2022] [Jonsson et al. 2019] [Jonsson et al. 2023] [Juhasz et al. 2023] [Kapania and Issac 1994] [Kapania et al. 1991] [Karpouzian 1991] [Kearns 1962] [Kehoe 1984] [Kehoe and Ellison 1985] [Kehoe 1987] [Khajah and Natarajan 2023] [Khalil et al. 2016] [Kheiri and Riazat 2025] [Kholodar 2023] [Kilimtzidis and Kostopoulos 2023a] [Kim 2016] [Klyde et al. 2004] [Kolar and Lile 1971] [Kousen and Bendiksen 1994] [Kretov and Tiniakov 2022] [Krzywoblocki 1943] [Kumar et al. 2019] [Kuo-Jiun et al. 1989] [Kusni et al. 2021] [Lee and Cho 1991a] [Lee and Cho 1991b] [Lehman and Stearman 1977] [Lei et al. 2021b] [Lemley 1968] [Lesoinne 2007] [Li and Pak 2015] [Li and Zhou 2024] [Li et al. 2018e] [Liao and Sun 1993] [Lin et al. 1989] [Lind et al. 1997] [Liu and Gao 2020] [Lottati 1987] [Lu and Murthy 1990] [Lunghitano et al. 2024] [Maewal 1984] [Mahapatra and Halbe 2024] [Mallik et al. 2015] [Mannini and Bartoli 2015] [Mardanpour et al. 2018] [Marqui et al. 2017] [Martini et al. 2022] [Miele 1976] [Modaress-Aval et al. 2019] [Mottershead and Cooper 2012] [Murphy et al. 1976] [Nagaraja et al. 1981] [Nagaraja et al. 1982] [Naresh and Srinivas 2024] [Ni et al. 2023] [Nibbelink and Peters 1993] [Niblett 1988] [Nitschke et al. 2019] [Ohkuma 1993] [Olsen 1965] [Onkar et al. 2024] [Otsuka and Makihara 2017] [Pan and Cheng 1995] [Pan and Liu 2019] [Pendleton et al. 1995] [Pengelley and Wilson 1954] [Perkins and Brice 1966] [Perry 2025] [Persoon et al. 1984] [Petre and Ashley 1976] [Pidaparti 1993] [Pidaparti and Yang 1993] [Pizzoli et al. 2022] [Prasad et al. 1967] [Price and Lee 1993] [Pushtaev 1989] [Qi et al. 2026] [Rao 1975] [Reding and Ericsson 1977] [Rehman 2022] [Richards et al. 2016] [Riso and Cesnik 2023] [Rizzetta 1977] [Rizzetta 1979] [Rogers 1970] [Rogólski and Olejnik 2018] [Roizner et al. 2019] [Ruhlin et al. 1982] [Ruhlin et al. 1983b] [Ruhlin et al. 1983a] [Runyan et al. 1952] [Rutkowski 1979] [Saputra and Purabaya 2018] [Sawyer 1976] [Schewe and Mai 2018] [Schmidt 2016a] [Schuster 1995] [Schwanz 1972] [Schäfer et al. 2018] [Seidel et al. 1989] [Shi et al. 2020] [Shi et al. 2021a] [Shiau and Chang 1991] [Shrivastava et al. 2020b] [Shukla and Patil 2017] [Silva and Bennett 1990] [Smith 2025] [Sodja et al. 2021] [Sohst et al. 2022] [Soleymani and Arani 2019] [Song et al. 2016] [Steger and Bailey 1980] [Stegmüller et al. 2026] [Striz 1991] [Swaim 1961] [Swaim and Yen 1979] [Swain et al. 2019] [Tang et al. 2015] [Tang et al. 2017a] [Teixeira and Cesnik 2020] [Tian et al. 2019] [Tian et al. 2026a] [Tian et al. 2026b] [Tijdeman et al. 1979b] [Tijdeman et al. 1979a] [Triplett et al. 1971] [Tsatsas et al. 2022] [Tsunematsu and Donadon 2019] [Turner 1982b] [Turner 1982a] [Veley et al. 2008] [Verma et al. 2024] [Verma et al. 2025] [Wahler et al. 2025] [Wang 2024a] [Wang et al. 2016c] [Wang et al. 2021g] [Wang et al. 2021e] [Wang et al. 2022a] [Wang et al. 2024d] [Wang et al. 2025j] [Wang et al. 2026f] [Weatherill and Zartarian 1958] [Werdes 1953] [Westin et al. 2023] [White et al. 1961] [Woods et al. 1990] [Woods et al. 1989] [Wu and Livne 2017] [Wu et al. 2025a] [Wunderlich et al. 2022] [Xie et al. 2016] [Xu et al. 2015a] [Yagil et al. 2018] [Yamasaki and Epureanu 2017] [Yang and Wan 1978] [Yang and Zhao 1989] [Yang and Zhao 1992] [Yang et al. 1980] [Yang et al. 1981] [Yang et al. 2016a] [Yang et al. 2019a] [Yates 1966] [Yates et al. 1982] [Yates et al. 1983] [Yates et al. 1981] [Yates and Chu 1987] [Ye et al. 2024] [Yuan et al. 2018] [Xu et al. 2015d] [Zhang et al. 2019c] [Zhao et al. 2023] [Zhao et al. 2026b] [Zhong et al. 2025] [Zhou and Huang 2021b] [Zhou et al. 2019a] [Zhou et al. 2025a] [Zhuang et al. 2021] [Zong et al. 2021] [Zou et al. 2024] [Zou et al. 2025b] [Zou et al. 2025a]

Digital fly-by-wire, redundancy and fault tolerance

Digital fly-by-wire flight control systems, redundancy management, fault detection, fault-tolerant control and control allocation.

274 records. [214 Application of Restructurable 1994] [Abdul Huq and Beebi M 2015] [Zuhairi Abdul Rashid et al. 2025] [Ackerman et al. 2017] [AHarrah 2007] [Ahmadi et al. 2022] [Akbari et al. 2025] [Aker and Alukonis 1976] [Ale Isaac et al. 2023] [Ali et al. 2026] [Anderson 1976] [Anikin et al. 2015] [Antonakis and Biannic 2024] [Application Analysis on Fly-by-Wire 2022] [Argha et al. 2018] [Argha et al. 2019] [Atmaca et al. 2025] [Bai 2018] [Bazhenov and Lysenkova 2015] [Belmont 1983] [Bessa et al. 2020] [Bessadi et al. 2016] [Bian et al. 2018] [Bian et al. 2019] [Binz and Moormann 2020] [Boby et al. 2019] [Bodson 2000] [Bosch and Kuehl 1976] [Bouras 2020] [Brock and Goodman 1981] [Brodecki and Subbarao 2015] [Brown and Szalai 1977] [Buffington 1997] [Buffington 1999b] [Bullock and Fields 1998] [Burken 2007] [Burns 1975] [Cano and Sobel 2016] [Cao and Liu 2025] [Cao et al. 2020] [Chakravarty and Mahanta 2015] [Chang et al. 2022a] [Chang et al. 2022b] [Chen et al. 2018d] [Chen et al. 2018e] [Chen et al. 2020a] [Chen et al. 2020b] [Chen et al. 2026b] [Choi 2016] [Clews 1973] [Comer and Chakraborty 2024] [Concorde Automatic Flight Control 1971] [Cong et al. 2023] [Cordeiro et al. 2024] [Corliss and Talbot 1977] [Cotton 1974] [Cui et al. 2016] [Cully and Boller 1973] [Dagal 2026] [Davis et al. 1977] [Deets 1975] [Demarchi and Haning 1978] [Demir and Seyfullah Babaarslan 2021] [Deng et al. 2024b] [Description and Flight Test 1975] [Dhadekar et al. 2021] [Dlamini and Jones 2016] [Dobos-Bubno and Hartsook 1977] [Dong et al. 2016] [Dong et al. 2025] [Drtil and Schulz 1978] [Duan and Okwudire 2019] [Dunn et al. 1986] [Ebner and Mark 1977] [El-Mahdy et al. 2025] [Fadel et al. 2019] [Fearnside 1962] [Feng et al. 2021] [Garcia-Hernandez et al. 2017] [Garmendia and Mavris 2016] [Gaurav et al. 2023] [Gavra and van Kampen 2024] [Gill 1995] [Govoni and Cristofaro 2023] [Guo 2021a] [Hammer and Bright 1998] [Han and Pei 2026] [He et al. 2020] [Henschel and Chetty 1989] [Herrmann and Ben-Asher 2016] [Hill 1987] [Hogan and Rinde 1978] [Hübener and Luckner 2026] [Ijaz et al. 2019b] [Ijaz et al. 2019a] [Immersion and Invariance Adaptive 2026] [İnan and Aliskan 2025] [Elliott 1977] [Elliott 1976] [Jarvis 1975] [Jarvis and Szalai 1981] [Jenney and Schreadley 1984] [Jenney et al. 1982] [Ji et al. 2023] [Jiao and Jiang 2015] [Johnson 1965] [Armah 2018] [Nagarathna and Deodhare 2023] [Kaczmarek 2026] [Kang et al. 2016] [Kim and Choi 2015] [Kim et al. 2017] [Kineyko 1982] [Kisslinger and Wendl 1971] [Kizildeniz and Kiyak 2025] [Knox-Seith 1963] [Ko et al. 2019] [Kohnhorst and Magnacca 1980] [Komnatska and Bondarenko 2017] [Konar et al. 1974] [Kopecki 2016] [Kosyanchuk et al. 2015] [Kosyanchuk et al. 2021] [Kotitschke et al. 2026] [Krachmalnick et al. 1968] [Kubica et al. 1995] [Kuvshinov 2016a] [Kuvshinov 2016b] [Kuvshinov and Leontiev 2019] [Larson 1987] [Li and Shi 2021] [Li et al. 2018f] [Li et al. 2021d] [Li et al. 2023a] [Li et al. 2025g] [Li et al. 2025f] [Li et al. 2025d] [Lian and Cao 2026] [Liang et al. 2024b] [Liu and Tian 2019] [Liu et al. 2023f] [Lock et al. 1975] [Lu et al. 2016] [Lu et al. 2019a] [Lucarini et al. 2025] [Ma et al. 2019] [Mackall and Allen 1989] [Mackall and Allen 1991] [Mahulkar 2010] [Malcom and Husband 1976] [Mammadov and Hajiyev 2018] [Mant 1972] [Martínez-Heredia et al. 2026] [Matsuki et al. 2018] [McGough et al. 1974] [McMaster and Schenk 1974] [Mhenni et al. 2016] [Milz et al. 2026] [Mohamed and Madhavan 2020] [Mohammadi et al. 2025] [Montgomery and Caglayan 1976] [Montgomery and Price 1976] [Montgomery and Price 1974] [Moreira et al. 2022] [Morozov and Chermoshentsev 2019] [Morozov and Janschek 2016] [Myers and Walsh 1991] [Napolitano 2002] [Nazari et al. 2017] [Nguyen et al. 2016] [Nguyen et al. 2025] [Niu et al. 2018] [Noordin et al. 2023] [Ochi and Kanai 1995] [Ogunvoul et al. 2017] [Om et al. 2020] [Osder et al. 1976] [Ossmann and Joos 2016] [Ossmann and Joos 2017] [Ouyang and Lin 2017] [Packard et al. 2009] [Passenbrunner et al. 2016] [Pendem 2023] [Peng et al. 2026a] [Pfeifle and Fichter 2023] [Pollack et al. 2024] [Posingies 1979] [Prototype Digital Flight Control 1986] [Pérez et al. 2022] [Qian et al. 2025] [Qin et al. 2023] [Ren et al. 2025] [Research and Design 2022] [Xingjian et al. 2024] [Rickard 1978] [Robbins et al. 2023] [Saetti 2025b] [Savelev and Neretin 2022] [Schreadley 1977] [Scordamaglia et al. 2025] [Seegmiller 1963] [Shearwood et al. 2020] [Shen et al. 2022] [Shi et al. 2018] [Siddiqui et al. 2016] [Sisson and Dogan 2026] [Sitz and Vernon 1990] [Smith 1991] [Smith and Meyer 1987] [Speyer 2003] [Staroswiecki and Amani 2015] [Steffensen et al. 2023] [Stephan et al. 2023] [Stirling 1983] [Sugino et al. 2019] [Sun et al. 2020a] [Sun et al. 2022] [Szalai 1975] [Szalai 1976] [Szalai et al. 1976] [Szalai et al. 1978] [Tai et al. 2023b] [Taimoor and Aijun 2019] [Tameh et al. 2018] [Tang et al. 2025] [Teixeira et al. 2018] [Terekhov 2022] [Tohidi et al. 2016] [Tokunaga et al. 2015] [Tribuno et al. 1976] [Unal 2021b] [Unal 2021a] [Uzun 2024] [Venkataraman and Seiler 2019] [Vile et al. 2020] [Vitushkin 2025] [Voting Software for Fault-Tolerant 1993] [Vukobratović and Stojić 1985] [Wang and Guo 2015] [Wang et al. 2019c] [Wang et al. 2020b] [Wang et al. 2025a] [Wang et al. 2025k] [Weinert and Meyer 1984] [Wells 2002] [Wen et al. 2023] [Whitbeck et al. 1982] [Wolfe 1967] [Xiao and Dong 2019] [Xiao and Liu 2018] [Xu and Wang 2016] [Xu et al. 2015b] [Xu et al. 2020] [Xue and Yao 2020] [Yang and Gao 2020] [Yang et al. 2015b] [Yildiz et al. 2011] [You 2020] [Yu et al. 2016] [Yuksek and Inalhan 2020] [Zakharov et al. 2015] [Zelenkov 2018] [Zhang et al. 2018e] [Zhang et al. 2020c] [Zhang et al. 2023] [Zhao and Li 2019] [Zhao et al. 2024a] [Zhirabok et al. 2024] [Zhou et al. 2026b] [Zhu and Duan 2015] [Zipperer et al. 1975a] [Zipperer et al. 1975b] [Zuhri 2025] [Морозов 2015]

Composite structures, damage and certification

Composite and variable-stiffness laminate structures, their damage, fatigue and repair, and composite wing design and test.

263 records. [Acoustic Emission Monitors Damage 1981] [Adan and Sheinman 1988] [Adney and Horn 1984] [Alexander et al. 1996] [Alhajahmad and Mittelstedt 2021] [Allen et al. 1983] [Allen et al. 1984] [Ansell et al. 1982] [Aston and Williams 1994] [Audoin and Baste 1994] [Badaliance and Dill 1981] [Badalló et al. 2015] [Baker et al. 1985] [Balaji et al. 2024] [Baranovski and Mikhailovskiy 2020] [Bauchau 1981] [Bellini and Sorrentino 2018] [Bendahmane et al. 2019] [Bending of Cross-Ply Laminated 1991] [Biskner and Higgins 2005] [Biswas 1993] [Bradley 1986] [Brooks and Martins 2018] [Bruno and Libeskind 1990] [Cagdas 2017] [Chen and Sun 1987] [Chen et al. 2018b] [Chinvorarat 2021] [Christoforou 1993] [Cohen 1978] [Composite Materials in Aircraft 1989] [Crabtree 1979] [Crawley and Lee 1978] [Crews and Naik 1986] [Croop 1985] [Daghighi et al. 2020] [Daken and Mar 1985] [Daniel 1976] [Darabi and Ganesan 2016] [Darabi and Ganesan 2017] [Daudeville and Ladevèze 1993] [Davis et al. 1993] [Deformational Behaviour 1990] [Derkach et al. 2022] [Dhonau et al. 1974] [Ding et al. 2022] [Dubary et al. 2018] [Dunmire 1982] [Durlofsky and Mayers 1970] [Dutta and Zhao 2025] [Dávila and Bisagni 2017] [Eckstrom and Spain 1982] [Effects of a Controlled 1988] [Elshazly et al. 2025] [Eriksson 1990] [Ewing et al. 1988] [Fanucci 1987] [Fatigue Behaviour of Composite 1977] [Fazilati and Khalafi 2019b] [Filamentary-Plastic Composite Laminate 1974] [Fina and Bisagni 2025] [Florance et al. 2004] [Fukunaga 1990] [Fukunaga and Sekine 1994] [Fukunaga et al. 1993] [Furtado et al. 2019] [Galasso et al. 2024] [Graves and Sawicki 1994] [Greenhalgh et al. 1993] [Greszczuk and Chao 1975] [Griffin and Harvill 1988] [Griffis et al. 1981] [Groh and Wu 2022] [Gunnink 1988] [Gupta 1998] [Had and Růžička 2016] [Hagnell et al. 2016] [Hahn and Kim 1976] [Harvill and Kizer 1976] [Hirai and Kline 1973] [Hisada et al. 2020] [Honeycomb-Laminate Composite Structure 1979] [Hong and Cheong 1993] [Howdyshell et al. 1998] [Huang et al. 2016] [Huang et al. 2024a] [Hui 1986] [Hybrid Composite Laminate Structures 1978] [Ilcewicz et al. 1991] [Interlaminar Shear Fracture 1992] [Iryani et al. 2019] [Ali and Haron 2021] [Jegley and Bush 1997] [Jegley and Bush 2001] [Jegley et al. 2001a] [Jegley et al. 2001b] [Jeyachandrabose and Kirkhope 1985] [Jiang et al. 2018a] [Jing and Tzeng 1995] [Jing et al. 2022] [Jing et al. 2023] [Jing et al. 2024] [Johnson and June 1972] [Johnson and McCarty 1977] [Jones et al. 1985] [Kalam et al. 2022] [Karal 2001] [Karimi et al. 2022] [Katunin et al. 2015] [Kcs et al. 2024] [Kennedy 1991] [Khani et al. 2017] [Kharghani and Mittelstedt 2022] [Kieffer 2006] [Kilimtzidis et al. 2023] [Klasztorny et al. 2018] [Klotzsche 1984] [Knauss and Stone 1982] [Knight 1982] [Kota et al. 1997] [Kubiak et al. 2019] [Kumar et al. 2025] [Kumar Shakya and Sekhar Padhee 2023] [Lai and Young 1995] [Lee and Lee 1990] [Lee and Mall 1989] [Lee et al. 1994] [Lei et al. 2020] [Leitch et al. 2024] [Leitch et al. 2025] [Li et al. 2026c] [Libeskind et al. 1973] [Liguori et al. 2024] [Liu et al. 2015] [Liu et al. 2019b] [Liu et al. 2023c] [Liu et al. 2023b] [Loja et al. 2017] [Long et al. 2021] [Loos and Springer 1983] [Loughlan and Ata 1995] [Lovejoy and Scotti 2019] [Luo et al. 2024] [Magliacano et al. 2025] [Manickam et al. 2025] [Mar and Lin 1979] [Marín and Graciani 2022] [Matrix Cracking and Stiffness 1985] [Mayer et al. 2016] [McKinney 1972] [Meng et al. 2019] [Mengzhu et al. 2026] [Mijovic 1985] [Mingong and Sun 2022] [Molent and Haddad 2020] [Morris 1977] [Mukhopadhyay and Sorokach 2015] [Naganarayana and Atluri 1995] [Negahban B. et al. 2025] [Neu and Huang 1973] [Nikrad et al. 2015] [Niu and Zhang 2022] [Non-Linear Bending of Antisymmetric 1977] [Norwood 1992] [Ozdil and Carlsson 1992] [Pagano 1974] [Palm et al. 2000] [Papirno 1977] [Park 2015] [Park 2016] [Patni et al. 2019] [Patterson and Grenestedt 2018] [Pellerin 1988] [Pereira et al. 2021] [Philippidis 1994] [Polyester Fibreglass-Reinforced Composite Laminate 1978] [Pritt 1980] [Pryor and Barker 1970] [Przekop and Jegley 2014] [Przekop et al. 2014] [Qiao et al. 2018a] [Qiu 2022] [Ramroop et al. 2025] [Rao and Uma Maheswara Rao 1992] [Rao and Hofer 1973] [Rapoff et al. 1990] [Rashed and Demir 2022] [Rate Sensitivity of Mode 1988] [Rathnasabapathy et al. 2022] [Rich et al. 1974] [Rouhi et al. 2018] [Roylance 1980] [Rumble 1987] [Ryder and Walker 1976] [Sabido et al. 2017] [Samukham et al. 2017] [Samukham et al. 2019] [Samukham et al. 2020] [Sandhu et al. 1991] [Schpey 1980] [Serhat et al. 2020] [Seshadri and Krishnamurthy 2017] [Seyoung 1990] [Shafei et al. 2024] [Shafighfard et al. 2019] [Shcherban et al. 2022] [Sheikhi et al. 2024b] [Sheikhi et al. 2024a] [Short 1995] [Shrivastava et al. 2020a] [Sinha et al. 2021] [Soovere 1982] [Spencer and Watson 1992] [Stanton and Crain 1980] [Stauffer and James 1978] [Study of Advanced Composite 1978] [Sulaeman et al. 2017] [Sun and Yoon 1988] [Suraj et al. 2023] [Synaszko et al. 2015] [Talreja and Phan 2019] [Tang 1989] [Tang and Liu 2018] [The Viscoelastic Behaviour 1981] [Thermal Damage Effects 1989] [Thermal Expansion and Swelling 1981] [Thomas et al. 2020] [Tian et al. 2025] [Toledano and Murakami 1987] [Torsional Stiffness of Plastic 1972] [Trabocco 1980] [Tungikar and Rao 1994] [Turner and Hoy 1976] [Ulry et al. 1976] [Urso et al. 2026] [van Dooren and Bisagni 2024] [Varun et al. 2022] [Vescovini and Dozio 2016] [Vilela and Donadon 2025] [Walker et al. 1997] [Wang et al. 2019b] [Wang et al. 2021a] [Wang et al. 2022e] [Wang et al. 2025d] [Wang 1996] [Wang et al. 1996] [Weisshaar and Ehlers 1990] [White et al. 2005] [Whitehead et al. 1992] [Whitworth 1987] [Wiggenraad and Bauld 1993] [Wu et al. 2015] [Xiao and Harrison 2021] [Xie et al. 2025] [Yalvaç et al. 1991] [Yang and Liu 1976] [Yang et al. 1994] [York and Williams 1995] [You et al. 2019] [Yu 1987] [Yu et al. 2017a] [Yuan and Reeder 2001] [Zhou et al. 2019d]

Aeroservoelasticity and structural mode control

Active flutter suppression, gust load alleviation and the coupling of structural modes with the control system.

192 records. [Ahmadi et al. 2024] [Alam et al. 2015] [Armanious and Lind 2017] [Armstrong et al. 2006] [Balatti et al. 2022] [Barbosa et al. 2022] [Batina and Yang 1985] [Berg et al. 2025] [Beyer et al. 2024a] [Beyer et al. 2024b] [Bi et al. 2017] [Broussard and Halyo 1983] [Brüderlin et al. 2018] [Burnett et al. 2016] [Carlson et al. 2017] [Cavaliere and Fezans 2024] [Cavaliere et al. 2024] [Chai et al. 2017] [Chen and Zhao 2020] [Chen et al. 2018a] [Chen et al. 2022a] [Chen et al. 2023a] [Chen et al. 2023b] [Chen et al. 2025a] [Chipman et al. 1982] [Chipman et al. 1983] [Cobo-González et al. 2026] [Dai and Yang 2015] [Darabseh et al. 2022] [de Souza et al. 2023] [Di Leone et al. 2021] [Dillinger et al. 2020] [Dilmi 2022] [Dul 2018] [Edwards 1983] [Farhat and Amsallem 2011] [Farsadi et al. 2026] [Fonte et al. 2015] [Fournier et al. 2022] [Friedmann 1998] [Gao and Cai 2016] [Gao et al. 2024] [Gilbert et al. 1982] [Goizueta et al. 2022a] [Griffin and Eastep 1981] [Gupta et al. 1987] [Gupta et al. 1989] [Guruswamy 2019] [Guruswamy and Tu 1989] [Haley and Soloway 2022] [Hamada et al. 2019] [Hansen et al. 2022] [Heckl et al. 1962] [Huang et al. 2019] [Huang et al. 2022] [Ibren et al. 2020] [Jalalnezhad 2026] [Kassem et al. 2020] [Kassem et al. 2021] [Khalil and Bauknecht 2024] [Khalil and Fezans 2020] [Kholodar 2016] [Klepl 1995] [Kratochvíl and Valenta 2024] [Krener 2001] [Kuvshinov et al. 2019] [Kuz’mina et al. 2020] [Lee and Kim 2021] [Lee and Singh 2018] [Li and Qin 2020] [Li and Qin 2021b] [Li and Qin 2021a] [Li and Qin 2022] [Liu 2018] [Liu and Sun 2016] [Liu and Sun 2017] [Liu and Wang 2019] [Liu et al. 2017b] [Liu et al. 2017a] [Liu et al. 2020] [Liu et al. 2022a] [Liu et al. 2023d] [Liu et al. 2025] [Livne 2018] [Mahgoub and El-Badawy 2022] [Mamedov et al. 2018] [Micheli 2024] [Moosavi and Elasha 2022] [Moreira et al. 2024] [Morino and Obayashi 2015] [Mu et al. 2022] [Mu et al. 2026] [Muscarello et al. 2016] [Muñoz and García-Fogeda 2022] [Muñoz and García-Fogeda 2024] [Nam et al. 2000] [Narimani et al. 2025] [Niel et al. 2017] [Noll et al. 1983] [Onkar 2021] [Ouyang et al. 2021a] [Passive Wing/store Flutter Suppression 1982] [Patartics et al. 2022] [Pena et al. 2018] [Phan 2020] [Piao et al. 2019] [Pourtakdoust and Khodabakhsh 2026] [Poussot-Vassal et al. 2017] [Pusch et al. 2019] [Qian 2018] [Qu and Li 2022] [Quero et al. 2019] [Rao and Padmanabhan 2019] [Rekik et al. 2024] [Reyes et al. 2019] [Rieck et al. 2026] [Rimer et al. 1983] [Ro et al. 1992] [Roizner and Karpel 2018] [Roizner and Karpel 2019] [Rosique et al. 2019] [Sabatini et al. 2026] [Sahyoun et al. 2026] [Schildkamp et al. 2023] [Schmidt 2016b] [Schmidt et al. 2020] [Scott et al. 2016] [sekhar et al 2024] [Sharma et al. 2022] [Simbuerger et al. 2022] [Singh et al. 2016] [Soneda et al. 2022] [Stanford 2016a] [Stanford 2017] [Stanford 2019] [Structural Aspects of Flexible 2000] [Suh et al. 2014] [Suh et al. 2015] [Szollosi and Baranyi 2016] [Szymanski et al. 2025] [Takarics and Vanek 2019] [Tang et al. 2016] [Tang et al. 2018] [Tang et al. 2020b] [Tang et al. 2020a] [Tantaroudas and Karachalios 2026] [Theis et al. 2020] [Ting et al. 2023] [Ting et al. 2026] [Toffol 2024] [Toffol and Ricci 2023] [Triplett 1972] [Triplett et al. 1973] [Tsushima and Su 2017] [Ursu et al. 2018] [Vepa and Kwon 2021] [Verhaegen and Żbikowski 2017] [Waitman and Marcos 2019] [Waitman and Marcos 2020] [Wang and Xu 2018] [Wang et al. 2018a] [Wang et al. 2019a] [Wang et al. 2025c] [Wheatcroft et al. 2025a] [Wheatcroft et al. 2025b] [Wie and Byun 1989] [Wu and Livne 2016] [Wu and Tong 2017] [Wu et al. 2025b] [Xiang and Wang 2023] [Xiong et al. 2026a] [Yang et al. 2017] [Yang et al. 2019c] [Yang et al. 2019b] [Yang et al. 2026d] [Yin et al. 2025] [Yingsong et al. 2015] [Yoo 2017] [Yue and Zhao 2020] [Yurtsever et al. 2026] [Zhang and Zhao 2023a] [Zhang et al. 2015a] [Zhang et al. 2018a] [Zhang et al. 2024c] [Zhang et al. 2026c] [Zhao et al. 2016a] [Zheng et al. 2024] [Zheng et al. 2026] [Zhou et al. 2018] [Zhu et al. 2017a] [Zou et al. 2021] [Zou et al. 2022]

Handling qualities and pilot-vehicle interaction

Handling and flying qualities criteria for augmented aircraft, pilot-induced oscillation and pilot modelling.

176 records. [Adams and Hatch 1971] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1969] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1981] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1988c] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1988a] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1988b] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1989] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1990c] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1990b] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1991b] [Ali 1997] [Anderson 1970] [Anderson 1985] [Anderson and Toivanen 1970] [Antonakis 2025a] [Antonakis 2025b] [Ashkenas 1984] [Bahr et al. 2021] [Bailey and Knotts 1990] [Bailey and Smith 1981] [Bailey et al. 1988] [Bar-Gill and Stengel 1986] [Berger et al. 2021] [Berger et al. 2022b] [Berger et al. 2022a] [Berry 1981] [Bidinotto et al. 2021] [Bischoff 1983] [Black and Moorhouse 1979] [Boothe et al. 1974] [Bowes and Miller 1976] [Broussard and Stengel 1977] [Callaghan and Kunz 2021] [Campos and Marques 2021] [Cavalcanti et al. 2026] [Chalk 1964] [Chalk et al. 1969] [Chance Vought Corp Dallas Tx 1979] [Chetty and Lakshmi 1991] [Chowhan et al. 2019] [Coldsnow et al. 2009] [Connelly 1982] [Crane and Sommer 1961] [Curry et al. 1965] [Difranco 1970] [Dorey et al. 1980] [Durand and Teper 1964] [Dussart et al. 2019] [Efremov et al. 2020] [Efremov et al. 2022] [Eichler 1970] [Eney 1968] [Engelland et al. 1992] [Favaro et al. 2025] [Ford 1989] [Fortiş et al. 2015] [Franklin and Innis 1978] [Franklin and Innis 1972] [Gallagher 1971] [Garg and Schmidt 1988] [Gerdes and Hynes 1972] [Gerken 1979] [Giles 1972] [Grant et al. 2015] [Grantham et al. 1976] [Guo 2021b] [Hall 1971] [Hall et al. 1974] [Hanson et al. 2011] [Harper and Robert P. 1955] [Hebbar and Pashilkar 2016] [Henriquez Huecas et al. 2022] [Herrington et al. 2023] [Hess 1984] [Hess 1989] [Hess 1991] [Hess 2016] [Hess 2018] [Hess and Sunyoto 1985] [Higgins and Shomber 1965] [Hirsch and McCORMICK 1966] [Hodgkinson et al. 1976] [Hoh and Mitchell 1983] [Huff 1949] [Humphreys-Jennings et al. 2020] [Ioannis and Ioannis 2026] [Ivler et al. 2022] [Jacobson and Joshi 1977] [Jacobson and Joshi 1978] [Jewell et al. 1979] [Ji et al. 2021a] [Ji et al. 2022] [Jing et al. 2020] [Jusko and Berger 2026] [Key 1971] [Key 1982] [Kim and Kunz 2017] [Kim et al. 2022] [Kish et al. 1997] [Kriechbaum and Stineman 1972] [Lampton et al. 2024] [Lawrence et al. 2018] [Lee et al. 2020] [Leondes and Rankine 1972] [Levi and Nelson 1964] [Levison 1982] [Li et al. 2024d] [Mabboux et al. 2024] [Malcom 1969] [Mandal and Gu 2016] [Marr and Roderick 1974] [McGREGOR and Smith 1966] [Memon et al. 2021] [Miller 1970] [Miller and Clark 1965] [Miranda and Bidinotto 2025] [Montgomery 1972] [Neal and Smith 1970] [Newton and Kroo 2025] [Nguyen et al. 2021] [Ohta et al. 1979] [Ohta et al. 1982] [Perfect et al. 2015a] [Perfect et al. 2015b] [Place et al. 1974] [Portapas and Cooke 2020] [Powers 1982] [Powers 1980] [Radford et al. 1980] [Ranaudo et al. 2000] [Rauer 2019] [Reeder 1958] [Reid et al. 1994] [Roscoe et al. 1975] [Sadoff et al. 1961] [Saetti and Rogers 2024] [Saetti et al. 2020] [Sammonds et al. 1982] [Schroeder et al. 2001] [Shafer 1980] [Shafer et al. 1983] [Shafer et al. 1984] [Shafer and Steinmetz 2001b] [Shafer and Steinmetz 2001a] [Shomber and Gertsen 1967] [Smith and Geddes 1979] [Smith et al. 1973] [Smith 1979] [Smith and Berry 1975] [Srinathkumar 2015] [Sun et al. 2020c] [Teper and Stapleford 1966] [Theodore et al. 2020] [Tischler et al. 1991] [Tran et al. 2017] [Tritschler and O’Connor 2016] [Truong et al. 2016] [Twisdale and Kirsten 1984] [Van Baelen et al. 2020] [van Dam et al. 1981] [Vinje and Miller 1973] [Walsh 1993] [Wang et al. 2021d] [Wang et al. 2023a] [Wang et al. 2025f] [Whitbeck and Hofmann 1978] [White et al. 2021] [Wilson et al. 1993] [Witte et al. 2003] [Woodcock and George 1976] [Xu et al. 2019c] [Yildiz and Kolmanovsky 2010] [Yin and Wang 2017] [Yuan et al. 2022] [Zanoni et al. 2022] [Zaytseva et al. 2021]

80 of the 176 records date from 1984 or earlier, by the year the aircraft first flew.

The X-29 and forward-swept wing aircraft

The aircraft’s own reports, and the forward-swept wing as a configuration, in the tunnel, in computation and in flight.

175 records. [Abed et al. 2024] [Adegbindin et al. 2016] [Ahmadi 1988] [Ashworth et al. 1986] [Ashworth et al. 1988] [Bach et al. 2016] [Bauer et al. 1995] [Baumgärtner et al. 2016] [Bjarke et al. 1992] [Bosworth 1992] [Bosworth and Cox 1989] [Bowers 1981] [Bowers 1984] [Breitsamter and Laschka 2001] [Budd 1984] [Budd 1987] [Calico and Fuller 1981] [Capone 1981] [Chacon and McBride 1988] [Chacon and McBride 1990] [Chen and Dugundji 1987] [Chin et al. 1982] [Chin et al. 1987] [Chipman et al. 1984] [Chipman et al. 1985] [Choosak Ngaongam and Rapee Ujjin 2024] [Clarke et al. 1994] [Coe et al. 1990] [Collins 1988] [Cotton and Bjarke 1994] [Croom et al. 1988] [Curry et al. 1989] [Curry et al. 1990] [Dawson and Fortin 1987] [Deandrea et al. 1991] [Del Frate 1992] [Delfrate and Saltzman 1992] [Dillinger et al. 2019] [Doggett and Ricketts 1980] [Earls and Sitz 1989] [Fehrs and Kaiser 2025] [Fisher et al. 1992] [Fratello et al. 1987] [Frei 1982] [Gera 1986] [Gera et al. 1987] [Gera et al. 1989] [Gilbert et al. 1984] [Goradia et al. 1989] [Grafton et al. 1982] [Griffin et al. 1983] [Griffin et al. 2010] [Guo et al. 1988] [Haase et al] [Hancock and Fullerton 1992] [Hertz et al. 1982] [Hicks and Huckabine 1989] [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Hicks and Matheny 1989] [Hicks and Moulton 1988] [Hicks and Petersen 1988] [Hicks and Petersen 1989] [Hicks et al. 1987c] [Hicks et al. 1987b] [Iliff and Wang 1996] [Ishmael and Wierzbanowski 1985] [Ishmael et al. 1990] [Jackuliak and Bugaj 2026] [Jiang et al. 2011] [Hicks et al. 1987a] [Jun-yi et al. 2021] [Kanazaki and Setoguchi 2023] [Kehoe et al. 1990] [Keller 2019] [Kishi et al. 2022] [Klafin 1988] [Kohara et al. 2016] [Krone 1980a] [Krone 1980b] [Krüger et al. 2014] [Landsberger and Dugundji 1985] [Lee and Ko 2009] [Li 2023] [Li et al. 2019e] [Librescu and Thangjitham 1988] [Librescu and Thangjitham 1989] [Librescu and Thangjitham 1991] [Lokos 1990] [Lombardi and Morelli 1994] [Lombardi et al. 1996] [Lombardi et al. 1997] [Mann and Mercer 1985] [Mann and Mercer 1986] [Marske 1975] [Mason and Capone 1983] [McCormack and Stevens 1947] [Miller 1983] [Miller 1986] [Miller et al. 1983] [Miyakawa et al. 1991] [Moore and Frei 1983] [Mourey 1979] [Murri et al. 1983] [Murri et al. 1984] [Nangia and Palmer 2002] [nath and ana 2017] [Noll et al. 1984] [Ouyang et al. 2021b] [Owens and Perkins 1996] [Oyibo 1984] [Puthisikamani et al. 2023] [Putnam 1983] [Putnam 1984b] [Putnam 1984a] [Putnam et al. 1986] [Raney and Batterson 1989] [Raney 1987] [Ray et al. 1988] [Ray et al. 1990] [Redeker and Wichmann 1991] [Rhodes and Selberg 1982] [Rimer et al. 1986] [Rimer et al. 1984a] [Robinson and Robinson 1980] [Rongrong et al. 2018] [Ross 1984] [Ross and Matarazzo 1982] [Russo et al. 1986] [Saheby et al. 2026] [Saltzman et al. 1994] [Sefic and Cutler 1986] [Sefic and Maxwell 1986] [Sefic and Maxwell 1987] [Seitz et al. 2019] [Setoguchi and Kanazaki 2020] [Sharif et al. 2022] [Sims et al. 1989] [Smith and Schroeder 1986] [Spacht 1980] [Stewart and Bauer 1983] [Takahashi et al. 2019] [Taufik and Qasem 2025] [Triplett 1980a] [Trippensee 1991] [Trippensee and Lux 1987] [Trippensee and Lux 1988] [Underwood et al. 2003] [Valasek and Downing 1995] [Voracek 1990] [Voracek and Clarke 1994] [Voracek and Clarke 1991] [Waggoner and Bates 1989] [Waggoner et al. 1986] [Walchli et al. 1992] [Wang et al. 2006] [Wang et al. 2017b] [Wang et al. 2018c] [Wang et al. 2025e] [Wauters 2022] [Weisshaar 1978] [Weisshaar 1979] [Weisshaar 1985] [Weisshaar and Zeiler 1983] [Weisshaar 1983] [Weisshaar and Zeiler 1982] [Wissler et al. 1987] [X-29 1991a] [X-29 1991b] [Xinbing et al. 2020] [Xue et al. 2019] [Yang and Przekwas 1993] [Yeh 1988a] [Yeh 1988b] [Yeh and Yeh 1989] [Zhang et al. 2013]

Of the 175 records, 74 titles name the X-29, published from 1982 to 2010, and 65 of those are report primaries. Of all 175 records, 88 date from 1985 to 1995, the years of the flight programme and its reports.

Transonic wing design and sweep

Transonic aerofoil and wing design, supercritical sections, transonic buffet and shock control, swept-wing flow and transonic unsteady pressures.

153 records. [Al-Jaburi et al. 2019] [Allison and Dagenhart 1987] [Andrés-Pérez et al. 2016] [Ardema and Williams 1972] [Arnault et al. 2016] [Bergman 1948] [Blackwell and Pounds 1977] [Bons and Martins 2020] [Boyden 1974] [Cahn and Garcia 1971] [Campbell and Smith 1989] [Carlson 1976] [Cebeci 1974] [Chaparro et al. 2016] [Chau and Zingg 2022] [Chau and Zingg 2023] [Chau et al. 2026] [Chen 1982] [Chen and Tang 2017] [Chen et al. 2015a] [Chen et al. 2022b] [Chen et al. 2023e] [Cheng et al. 1980] [Droney et al. 2020] [Chu and Lawing 1990] [Clyde et al. 1984] [Coder 2021] [Coder 2026] [Cole 1988b] [Cole et al. 1980] [Cook 1979] [Currao and Jiang 2026] [Damodaran and Caughey 1988] [Dandois 2016] [Deng and Qin 2021] [Deng and Yi 2023] [Deng et al. 2023] [Deng et al. 2026b] [Design and CFD Analysis 2024] [Di Pasquale and Prince 2023] [Ecer 1985] [Erickson 2003] [Fan et al. 2021] [Fung 1982] [Garabedian 1979] [Geoghegan et al. 2020] [Guderley 1956] [Hanman et al. 2025] [Harris 1974b] [Harris 1974a] [Hess et al. 1989] [Hinchliffe and Qin 2017] [Holst and Brown 1983] [Hope and Kunz 2019] [Hortsen et al. 1983] [Houtman et al. 2023] [Hurley 1975] [Janardhan and Grandhi 2003] [Ji et al. 2025] [Jiang et al. 2018b] [Jiang et al. 2019] [Jones and Jarrett 2018] [Jou and Metcalfe 1984] [Kakkar et al. 2026] [Kasim Biber and Trenton White 2019] [King and Johnson 1986] [Kishi et al. 2016] [Koenig 1984] [Lee and Eyi 1993] [Lee and Ohman 1984] [Lee and Tang 1989] [Lei et al. 2021a] [Li et al. 2019b] [Li et al. 2020] [Li et al. 2024b] [Lifshits and Ryzhov 1978] [Liu et al. 2016b] [Liu et al. 2024a] [Magnus and Yoshihara 1975] [Mann et al. 1983] [Mann et al. 1984] [Masini et al. 2019] [Masini et al. 2020] [Mateer et al. 1987] [Mayer et al. 2019] [Mazaheri and Nejati 2015] [Mazaheri et al. 2015b] [Mazaheri et al. 2015a] [Mazaheri et al. 2016] [Mazaheri et al. 2017] [Maślanka et al. 2025] [Nakamura 1982] [Nazarenko and Nevezhina 1972] [Niu and Li 2022] [Ntantis and Xezonakis 2024] [Olsen 1966] [Park et al. 2026] [Paul and Rein 2017] [Pelykh and Andryushchenko 2024] [Persoon et al. 1980] [Pham 2022] [Placek and Ruchała 2018] [Plotkin 1978] [Poole et al. 2026] [Quagliarella and Iuliano 2017] [Ricketts et al. 1983b] [Ricketts et al. 1983a] [Roberts et al. 2015] [Rodemich and Andrew 1965] [Rose and Seginer 1978] [Ruo et al. 1985] [Sabater et al. 2022] [Viken et al. 2022] [Samputh et al. 2024] [Sato 1973] [Seidel et al. 1987] [Seidel et al. 1985] [Serani et al. 2024] [Singh and Dwivedi 2022] [Smetana 1973] [Sobieczky 1984] [Stanewsky and Little 1971] [Streit et al. 2015] [Sudhi et al. 2023] [Sun et al. 2020b] [Sun et al. 2026a] [Surwase and Kumar 2025] [Tang et al. 2017b] [Tian et al. 2017] [Tian et al. 2023] [Ting et al. 2018] [Tsushima et al. 2021b] [Van Den Berg et al. 1975] [Velkova 2017] [Weed et al. 1983] [Williams 1980] [Wing Buffeting Control 2018] [Wu and Squires 1995] [Wu et al. 2022] [Xu et al. 2019b] [Xu et al. 2019a] [Yang et al. 2025b] [Yang et al. 2026c] [Zauner and Sandham 2020] [Zauner et al. 2023] [Zhang et al. 2015c] [Zhang et al. 2021d] [Zhang et al. 2022a] [Zhang et al. 2026d] [Zhao et al. 2016b] [Zhong et al. 2026] [Zhou et al. 2017] [Zhu et al. 2019]

High angle of attack and vortex flow

High angle of attack aerodynamics and control, vortex flow and vortex breakdown, post-stall flight and thrust vectoring.

145 records. [A Feasibility Review 2019] [A Spreadsheet Tool 2018] [Ahmed et al. 2025] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1991a] [Almosnino 1985] [Altunkaya and Özkol 2025] [Axelson 1977] [Bagherzadeh 2026] [Bagherzadeh et al. 2025] [Banks 1988b] [Ben-Gida and Gurka 2022] [Bihrle and Billy 1980] [Briggs et al. 1982] [Buffington and Adams 1995] [Buzica et al. 2018] [Cen et al. 2020] [Chin 1989] [Clark and Spurlin 1962] [Cornelius and Lucius 1994] [Cunis et al. 2019] [Cunis et al. 2020b] [Richwine and Fisher 1992] [Dawe et al. 2025] [Dexter 1993] [Dodayav et al. 2024] [Ekaterinaris and Schiff 1990] [Ekaterinaris and Schiff 1994] [Esfahani et al. 2018] [Experimental Investigation of Synthetic 2023] [Faure et al. 2019] [Favier et al. 1987] [Fujii 1985] [Golmirzaee and Wood 2026] [Hadidoolabi and Ansarian 2017] [Hadidoolabi and Ansarian 2018] [Hemsch 1989] [Hirato et al. 2019] [Hitzel 2017] [Huang et al. 2026] [Jiang et al. 2024a] [Johari et al. 1995] [Johnston et al. 1974] [Kolb et al. 2019] [Kurade et al. 2021] [Lamar 1978] [Lamar and Frink 1981a] [Lamar and Frink 1981b] [Lamar and Luckring 1979] [Lamar et al. 1980] [Lan and Tseng 1987] [Lee 2016] [Lee and Ko 2018] [Lee and Singh 2017] [Lemay et al. 1988] [Li and Yang 2017] [Li et al. 2017] [Li et al. 2021e] [Li et al. 2025c] [Li et al. 2025b] [Liu et al. 2018b] [Liu et al. 2019a] [Liu et al. 2024b] [Nguyen et al. 1980] [Lyu et al. 2018] [Lyu et al. 2019] [Ma et al. 2015] [Magness et al. 1993] [Mahgoub and Cortelezzi 2020] [Malik et al. 2017] [Mamonova et al. 2019] [Manzoor et al. 2016] [Mareca Rios et al. 2023] [Ogburn et al. 1991] [McKeehen and Cord 1997] [Menet et al. 1993] [Menon and Yousefpor 1996] [Mitchell et al. 1980] [Mobayen and Izadbakhsh 2025] [Muir et al. 2017] [Narayanan et al. 2026] [Nelson and Mouch 1978] [Numerical Analysis 2017] [Nikkhoo and Esmaeili 2023] [Oberkampf and Nicolaides 1971] [Orkwis 1995] [Orlik-Ruckemann 1983] [Osipov 2016] [Osipov 2017] [Osipov 2019] [Peng et al. 2026b] [Pfnür and Breitsamter 2019] [Poll 1986] [Ragab et al. 2018] [Rainbird et al. 2015] [Reddy 1987] [Richwine and Fisher 1991] [Rockwell 1994] [Rohith and Sinha 2020] [Sahin et al. 2026] [Sahu et al. 2000] [Salahudden 2025] [Sellers et al. 1988] [Sellers et al. 2004] [Shen and Chen 2022] [Shen and Chen 2024] [Shen and Wen 2018] [Shi et al. 2019] [Shivam and Verma 2019] [Shojae et al. 2025] [Son et al. 2015b] [Son et al. 2015a] [Sternberg et al. 1994] [Stollery 1992] [Tahir et al. 2026] [Tan et al. 2021] [Telionis 1995] [Telionis 2001] [Theisen et al. 1973] [Van Dommelen 1995] [Van Tuyl 1988] [Vlahostergios et al. 2018] [Walchli 1994] [Wang et al. 2016a] [Wang et al. 2021f] [Wang et al. 2025b] [Wang et al. 2025h] [Wang et al. 2025i] [Wang et al. 2026c] [Wardlaw et al. 1975] [Wei et al. 2017] [Wilson et al. 1994] [Wood and Miller 1985] [Wu et al. 2017b] [Wu et al. 2020] [Wu et al. 2021a] [Yang et al. 2025a] [Ye et al. 2015] [Yu and Yu 2026] [Zhang et al. 2017] [Zhang et al. 2022c] [Zhao et al. 2026a] [Zhou et al. 2019b] [Zhu et al. 2022] [Zohar and Er-El 1988] [ÖZkan 2020]

Morphing and adaptive structures

Morphing wings, variable camber and adaptive structures.

123 records. [Aamir et al. 2026] [Ajaj et al. 2021] [Alsaidi et al. 2019b] [Alsaidi et al. 2019a] [Application Status and Future 2023] [Babu et al. 2026] [Badihi et al. 2026] [Bartels et al. 2019] [Bashir et al. 2021] [Bashir et al. 2024] [Bataineh and Shawabkeh 2023] [Battaglia and Riccio 2026] [Beatty et al. 1977] [Bhattacharyya et al. 2019] [Bradley et al. 2026] [Burdette and Martins 2018] [Changchuan et al. 2022] [Chen et al. 2026a] [Clark 2001] [Clements and Djidjeli 2023] [Çoban 2020] [Contell Asins et al. 2021] [Dai et al. 2025] [De Gaspari et al. 2018] [Dexl et al. 2020] [Ding and Zhou 2018] [El-Salamony and Aziz 2020] [Eraslan and Oktay 2023] [Feng et al. 2023] [Fichera et al. 2019] [Gong et al. 2019a] [Gu and Hong 2020] [Guo et al. 2017c] [Guo et al. 2017a] [Guo et al. 2025] [Hu et al. 2016] [Hua et al. 2025] [Hübler et al. 2016] [Jin and Xue 2026] [Jo and Majid 2023] [Joshi et al. 2026] [Kambayashi and Kogiso 2026] [Karimi Kelayeh and Djavareshkian 2024] [Kaul and Nguyen 2018] [Kaygan and Ulusoy 2018] [Keidel et al. 2020] [Klimczyk and Goraj 2019] [Koyuncuoglu and He 2022] [Kuder et al. 2015] [Lee and Sheikh 2025] [Lendraitis 2019] [Lendraitis and Lukoševičius 2023] [Lendraitis and Lukoševičius 2025] [Li et al. 2024c] [Lin and Crawley 1995] [Liu et al. 2026e] [Lu et al. 2017] [Lyu and Martins 2015] [Ma et al. 2025a] [Mao et al. 2019] [Michaud et al. 2018] [Mkhoyan et al. 2022] [Moens 2019] [Morton et al. 2023] [Nazeer et al. 2021] [Negahban et al. 2024] [Nguyen et al. 2018] [Nguyen and Urnes 2012] [Nguyen et al. 2015] [Olivett et al. 2021] [Ozbek et al. 2024] [Shah et al. 2023] [Patel et al. 2022] [Rea et al. 2018] [Reist et al. 2022] [Rivero et al. 2021] [Rodinò and Maletta 2024] [Roy and Mukherjee 2026] [Runkel et al. 2018] [Sabri et al. 2022] [Sheikh et al. 2023] [Shen et al. 2015] [Shi and Wan 2015] [Sivanandi et al. 2025] [Su et al. 2016] [Svoboda et al. 2023] [Syed et al. 2022] [Takahashi et al. 2016] [Tarnowski 2017] [Ting et al. 2015] [Traub 2019] [Tsushima et al. 2018] [Tsushima et al. 2019a] [Tsushima et al. 2019b] [Uzun and Oktay 2023] [Wang 2026] [Wang et al. 2021i] [Wang et al. 2025g] [Webb et al. 1988] [Weisshaar and Ehlers 1992] [Woods et al. 2015] [Wu and Xu 2023] [Wu et al. 2017a] [Xiang et al. 2018] [Xijuan et al. 2016] [Xu et al. 2018] [Yan et al. 2025] [Yang et al. 2024c] [Yang et al. 2024b] [You et al. 2020] [Yu et al. 2024] [Yue et al. 2017] [Zha et al. 2026] [Zhang and Wang 2019] [Zhang and Zhao 2023b] [Zhang et al. 2015b] [Zhang et al. 2021a] [Zhang et al. 2025a] [Zhou and Huang 2021a] [Zhu et al. 2024] [Zhu et al. 2025] [Şahin and Yaman 2018a] [Şahin and Yaman 2018b]

117 of the 123 records date from 2015 or later.

Aerostructural and aerodynamic design optimisation

Aerostructural and aerodynamic shape optimisation of wings and aircraft, including optimisation under aeroelastic constraints.

118 records. [Abdul-Kaiyoom et al. 2025] [Adler and Martins 2023] [Aero Structural Optimization 2018] [Ariyarit and Kanazaki 2017] [Bahamonde Jacome and Elham 2017] [Benaouali and Boutemedjet 2024] [Bombardieri et al. 2021] [Bons et al. 2022] [Bowman et al. 1989] [Brooks et al. 2019] [Bryson and Rumpfkeil 2019] [Bugała 2025] [Bugała and Payenskyy 2025] [Chauhan and Martins 2021] [Chauhan and Martins 2024] [Chauhan et al. 2023] [Chen et al. 2023c] [Choi and Park 2019] [Conlan-Smith and Andreasen 2022] [Cui et al. 2025] [Dababneh et al. 2018] [De et al. 2019] [Demir et al. 2023] [Design Optimization for SG6043 2025] [Dinler 2025] [Elham 2015] [Elham and van Tooren 2016a] [Elham and van Tooren 2016b] [Feng 2023] [Filippou et al. 2024] [Fontana et al. 2024] [Garner et al. 2023] [Gray et al. 2025] [Guo et al. 2021] [Gurdal 2002] [Gurdal et al. 1999] [Hoogervorst and Elham 2017] [Hu et al. 2025] [Jacome and Elham 2018] [Jelovica and Cai 2022] [Kafkas et al. 2021] [Kalinowski 2015] [Kambampati and Smith 2017] [Kano et al. 2025] [Kapania et al. 1997] [Kenway and Martins 2016] [Kilimtzidis and Kostopoulos 2023b] [Kontogiannis et al. 2024] [Lei et al. 2019] [Li and Zhang 2021b] [Li and Zhang 2021a] [Li et al. 2018b] [Li et al. 2019d] [Li et al. 2019a] [Li et al. 2021a] [Li et al. 2022d] [Li et al. 2022c] [Li et al. 2023b] [Li et al. 2024a] [Li and Pak 2014] [Liu and He 2018] [Liu et al. 2017c] [Lv et al. 2019] [Lyu et al. 2015] [Ma et al. 2023] [Ma et al. 2024a] [Matos and Marta 2025] [McDonnell and Ning 2020] [Miura and Neill 1992] [Mohammad Zadeh and Sayadi 2018] [Moon 1996] [Navrátil 2017] [Nejati and Mazaheri 2017] [Nikolaev 2019] [Nikolaou et al. 2026] [Oza and Vala 2021] [Phuekpan et al. 2025] [Poole et al. 2022] [Rais-Rohani et al. 1992] [Rais-Rohani 1999] [Rajpal et al. 2019] [Rao et al. 2023] [Rashmikant and Abe 2026] [Reist et al. 2019] [Reist et al. 2020] [Ringertz 1994] [Saporito et al. 2023] [Sheshanarayana et al. 2026] [Shi et al. 2021b] [Shi et al. 2023] [Shimoda et al. 2018] [Shinde et al. 2021] [Stodieck et al. 2018] [Sun 2024] [Sun et al. 2026b] [Tsiakas et al. 2024] [van den Kieboom and Elham 2017] [Wang et al. 2021b] [Wansasueb et al. 2023] [Wollner 1972] [Wunderlich 2015] [Wunderlich et al. 2021] [Xia and Chen 2015] [Xie et al. 2017] [Xu and Xia 2016] [Xu et al. 2026a] [Yang et al. 2015a] [Yang et al. 2026a] [Yu 2018] [Yu et al. 2018] [Zhang and Rizzi 2017] [Zhang et al. 2018c] [Zhang et al. 2020d] [Zhang et al. 2024b] [Zhao and Cheng 2019] [Ziakos et al. 2025] [Zou et al. 2017] [Zuo et al. 2015]

Flight test, instrumentation and identification

Flight test method, the identification of stability and control derivatives from flight data, wind tunnel technique, and the measurement of wing deformation in flight.

107 records. [Abele and Sanlorenzo 1975] [Abele et al. 1973] [Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards AFB CA 1974a] [Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards AFB CA 1974b] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1967b] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1967a] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1990d] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1993] [Alexander 1991] [Arif and Sasongko 2021] [Armstrong 1977] [Bakunowicz and Meyer 2016] [Balatti et al. 2021] [Bantscheff and Breitsamter 2023] [Batterson and Omara 1989] [Beharie et al. 2015] [Bennett et al. 1977] [Beyers 1988] [Billingsley 1976] [Binion 1971] [Binion 1975] [Bliss 1980] [Boden et al. 2013a] [Boden et al. 2013b] [Brooks and Beamish 1977] [Burner and Martinson 1996] [Burt 1975] [Butler 1976] [Carico 1998] [Chen et al. 2017a] [Chen et al. 2024] [Clarke et al. 1982] [Cohen and Le 1991] [Cornell Aeronautical Lab INC Buffalo NY 1947] [Czysz 1963] [De Wagter and Meulenbeld 2019] [Deangelis 1981] [DeAngelis 1982] [Deepa and Gupta 2023] [Dehghan Manshadi and Saghafi 2021] [Dias 2023] [Dowell and Bliss 1978] [Enciu 2019] [Fan 2026] [Feng et al. 2024] [Flight Test Data Analysis 2016] [Hopwood et al. 2023] [Hou 2025] [Hu et al. 2026] [Iliff et al. 1978] [Jategaonkar 2023] [Jenks et al. 1977] [Kannemans 1995] [Kashitani et al. 2019] [Kilgore and Averett 1964] [Kim et al. 2023] [Kirmse 2016] [Kraft and Reeder 1948] [Kurita et al. 2013] [Kurita et al. 2019] [Lavretsky 2019] [Li and Wang 2021] [Li et al. 2014] [Liang et al. 2026] [Lichota 2023] [Liu et al. 2026b] [Lu et al. 2019b] [Ma and Chen 2020] [Mackall et al. 1988] [Matt et al. 2025] [Meng and Jiang 2025] [Moes et al. 2000] [Moes et al. 2003] [Mulder 1988] [Murphy 1996] [Napolitano 1996] [Napolitano and Spagnuolo 1993] [Narendra and Tripathi 1973] [Norton 1990] [Pang et al. 2014] [Patel et al. 2023] [Murphy 1999] [Pena 2020] [Petersen 1981] [Plaetschke et al. 1982] [Ružička et al. 2013] [Saderla et al. 2016] [Saderla et al. 2018] [Simmons 2023] [Simmons et al. 2023] [Singh and Raisinghani 1993] [Srivastava 2019] [Stalford 1979] [Steinmetz et al. 1972] [Stottier 1995] [Sun et al. 2019] [Tagai et al. 2016] [Tai et al. 2023a] [Traven and Whitley 1995] [Van Doren 1955] [Veerman et al. 2013] [Wakimoto et al. 2021] [Wang et al. 2022g] [Wang et al. 2022d] [Whitlow et al. 1991] [Yasue 2020] [Yu et al. 2025]

Aeroelastic tailoring and bend-twist coupling

Aeroelastic tailoring, bend-twist coupling and the mechanics of anisotropic laminated plates.

104 records. [Ahmadi and Farsadi 2024] [Alyanak and Pendleton 2017] [Annadata et al. 2024] [Ansari et al. 2023] [Ayaz et al. 2024] [Ayorinde and Gibson 1993] [Babuska et al. 2018] [Bi-quan and Huan-wen 1990] [Binder et al. 2021] [Bohlmann et al. 1990] [Bohlmann and Scott 1991] [Bohlmann et al. 1988] [Bordogna et al. 2020] [Cesnik 2002] [Cesnik 2005] [Chattopadhyay and Jha 1996] [Chattopadhyay and Zhang 1995] [Chen and Han 2017] [Choi et al. 2020] [Cui et al. 2022] [Cui et al. 2026] [Das and Kapuria 2016] [de Souza and De Leon 2023] [Dunning et al. 2014] [Fazeli et al. 2022] [Feil et al. 2020] [Fraihat and Ajaj 2024] [Francois et al. 2017] [Fung and Doong 1988] [Giese et al. 1996] [González-Montijo et al. 2026] [Green 1987] [Green 1986] [Grenestedt 1989] [Gu et al. 2022] [Hahn and Haupt 2022] [He et al. 2023] [Heeg 2006] [Heeg et al. 2005] [Isogai 1988] [Isogai 1989] [Jang and Ahn 2022] [Jegley and Wijayratne 2004] [Jensen and Crawley 1984] [Jensen et al. 1982] [Jonnalagadda et al. 2015] [Kim et al. 2016a] [Kirsch et al. 2020] [Krüger et al. 2022] [Li et al. 2018d] [Li et al. 2019c] [Librescu and Song 1992] [Liu et al. 2023a] [Lottati 1988] [Loughlan 2019] [Marano et al. 2022] [Marques et al. 2017] [McWilliam et al. 2018] [Meirovitch 1995] [Melville et al. 2020] [Mihaila-Andres et al. 2019] [Miranda et al. 2025] [Monaghan 1981] [Murray et al. 2015] [Najmi et al. 2024] [Namani Koureh et al. 2026] [Opgenoord and Willcox 2019] [Othman et al. 2019] [Padovan 1973] [Padovan 1974] [Rais-Rohani 1994] [Rajpal et al. 2021] [Raouf 1994] [Ren 1986] [Shakya and Padhee 2023] [Shao et al. 2025] [Sharifi et al. 2025] [Sherrer et al. 1981] [Shirk et al. 1986] [Shyprykevich 1979] [Stanford 2016b] [Stanford and Jutte 2017] [Stanford et al. 2016] [Stanford and Jutte 2014] [Stanford et al. 2015] [Stodieck et al. 2015] [Stodieck et al. 2017] [Targoff 1947a] [Tian et al. 2016] [Triplett 1980b] [Vertonghen et al. 2026] [Viglietti et al. 2019] [Wang and Rogers 1991] [Weisshaar 1981] [Weisshaar and Ryan 1986] [Werter and De Breuker 2016] [Wunderlich and Dähne 2017] [Wunderlich et al. 2017] [Ying et al. 2021] [Young et al. 2018] [Yu et al. 2017b] [Zaw and Baranovski 2026] [Zhang et al. 2019b] [Zhang et al. 2020b]

Divergence and static aeroelasticity

Static aeroelasticity and divergence, of swept, forward-swept and oblique wings and of wind tunnel models.

95 records. [A Study 1973] [Arena and Lacarbonara 2012] [Asadi Khanouki et al. 2019] [Awadalla Ali Haj Ahmed 2024] [Ahmed 2024] [Balakrishnan and Tuffaha 2012] [Bhardwaj and Kapania 1995] [Blair and Weisshaar 1981] [Blair and Weisshaar 1982] [Bland 1980] [Bohlmann 1989] [Bolotin et al. 1996] [Bueno and Dowell 2020] [Campagna et al. 2025a] [Carrera et al. 2013] [Castellani et al. 2017] [Cestino and Iannuzzo 2026] [Cole 1988a] [Cole 1986] [Craig and Erbug 1976] [Diederich and Budiansky 1948] [Eastep et al. 1984] [Edwards 1992] [Edwards and Wieseman 2003] [Edwards and Wieseman 2008] [Ehlers and Weisshaar 1993] [Griffin and Eastep 1982] [Guo et al. 2022] [Gwin 1976] [Gwin 1974] [Haas and Chopra 1988] [Heeg et al. 2004] [Hildebrand and Reissner 1944] [Hollowell and Dugundji 1982] [Hollowell and Dugundji 1984] [Hopkins and Yee 1977] [Hunn 1953] [Hwu and Tsai 2002] [Isogai 1992] [Jones 1976] [Jones and Nisbet 1976] [Kobelev 2019] [Koo and Lee 1994] [Kornev et al. 2021] [Kulikov 2020] [Kunaporn et al. 2014] [Lee and Kim 1995] [Lerner and Markowitz 1979] [Li and Wang 2018] [Li et al. 2024e] [Librescu and Khdeir 1988] [Librescu and Maalawi 2009] [Librescu and Simovich 1988] [Liu 2019] [Lottati 1985] [Maalawi 2019] [Mathur et al. 2026] [Niblett 1986] [Pearson and Aiken 1944] [Rajamurugu et al. 2024] [Rea (j B) CO INC Santa Monica CA 1957] [Reinbold et al. 2026] [Ricketts and Doggett 1980] [Rimer et al. 1984b] [Rodden 1981] [Rodden 1984] [Rodden 1989b] [Rodden 1989a] [Rodden and Bellinger 1982] [Roskam and Lan 1973] [Ruscheweyh 1983] [Sachs 1975] [Satt and Ilanko 2007] [Schuster and Lokos 1988] [Schuster and Edwards 2004] [Segel 1952] [Shivaji et al. 2025] [Silva] [Song and Librescu 1991] [Targoff 1947b] [Taylor 1959] [Taylor et al. 1999] [Thwapiah and Campanile 2010] [Ting et al. 2014b] [Townsend et al. 2018] [Van Zyl 2001] [van Zyl and Maserumule 2001] [Vedeneev 2020] [Verri et al. 2025] [Wan et al. 2003] [Wang 2019] [Weisshaar 1980] [Wooldridge 1960] [Zeiler 1999] [Zhang et al. 2021c]

Of the 95 records, 33 date from 1984 or earlier, and 17 titles name forward sweep.

Sampled-data control and time delay

Sampled-data and digital control, time delay and networked control.

91 records. [044 Finite Worldlength Control 1994] [057 H∞ Control Design 1994] [130 Sampled-Data Decentralized Controller 1994] [185 a Fourier Series 1994] [A Hybrid Adaptive Control 1995] [Ackermann and Isermann 1973] [Alcaina et al. 2019] [Aslam and Chen 2018] [Azadegan and Beheshti 2017] [Berman and Gran 1974] [Bernstein and Hollot 1989] [Berry et al. 1982] [Chen et al. 2017b] [Chen et al. 2022c] [Chin et al. 1994] [Crane 1983] [Crane 1984] [Czyba and Stajer 2019] [Design of Discrete-Time Adaptive 1995] [Digital Model-Reference Flight Control 1994] [Farkh et al. 2021] [Mohan 2020] [Halder et al. 2020b] [Hirai and Satoh 1980] [Ishii 2023] [Jajarmi and Hajipour 2016] [Khargonekar and Sivashankar 1991] [Kodama 1962] [Kumar et al. 2022] [Kuzu et al. 2015] [Lee and Sheu 1994] [Lennartson 1989] [Li et al. 2016b] [Liu and Zhang 2018] [Liu et al. 2026a] [Lu et al. 2019c] [M. and Jury 1959] [Ma et al. 2024b] [Mishra et al. 2025] [Miyasato 1992] [Miyazawa 1993] [Mohanty and Chhotaray 1979] [Narenshakthi and Dharani 2025] [Nekooei et al. 2021] [Nihtilä 1989] [Ocali and Sezer 1992] [Ohkawa 1985] [Ohkawa 1986] [Panuntun et al. 2020] [Peled and Powell 1978] [Phillips 1965] [Plyako 1977] [Qiao et al. 2018b] [Raghavan 1971] [Rehan et al. 2015] [Rohella and Chatterjee 1979] [Sampling Schemes in Sampled-Data 1961] [Shah and Desai 1973] [Shah and Mehta 2017] [Shen et al. 2021] [Shieh and Chen 1998] [Shields and Cook 1971] [Tang 2025] [Tharp and Zhang 1994] [Tian 2016] [Tian 2020] [Tian 2021] [Tian and Tang 2025] [Tian et al. 2015] [Tsoutsinos 1994] [Tsypkin and Fu 1993] [Viola et al. 2020] [Voulgaris 1994] [Wang et al. 2016d] [Wang et al. 2022f] [Weissenberger 1969] [Wu and Deng 2015] [Xiang and Liu 2024] [Yahagi 1971] [Yang 2024] [Yang et al. 2023] [Yang et al. 2024a] [Yao 2018] [Yaseen and Bayart 2018] [Yi et al. 2017] [You et al. 2022] [Zhang 2023] [Zhang et al. 2024a] [Zhou et al. 1989] [Zuo et al. 2016] [ŽEnÍŠEk 1973]

Canards, trim and multiple lifting surfaces

Canard aerodynamics, canard-wing interaction, trim and multiple lifting surfaces.

88 records. [Agrell and Elmeland 1985] [Aidala 1985] [Bandyopadhyay 1989] [Bandyopadhyay 1991] [Boyden 1978] [Bright and Peterson 1960] [Burkhalter 1993] [Calarese 1984] [Chen et al. 2016] [Chen et al. 2023d] [Das and Longo 1995] [de Silva and Carmichael 1978] [Desilva and Medan 1978] [Dong et al. 2019] [Durston and Schreiner 1983] [Dwivedi et al. 2022] [Er-El 1988] [Er-El and Seginer 1985] [Eugene 1996] [Fan et al. 2025] [Finkleman 1972] [Gao et al. 2019] [Gloss and Washburn 1978] [Gloss and Washburn 1977] [Goodrich et al. 1989] [Gupta 2023] [Hitzel and Osterhuber 2018] [Howard and O’Leary 1994] [Huffman 1975] [Hummel and Oelker 1994] [Ignatyev and Khrabrov 2018] [Ingram et al. 1986] [Ito and Iwashita 2017] [Jiang et al. 2022] [Kalugin et al. 2022] [Katz and Levin 1986] [Katz et al. 1986] [Keith and Selberg 1984] [Keith and Selberg 1985] [Kim and Kang 2025] [Komarov and Zinchenko 2023] [Lai 2024] [Landfield and Rajkovic 1986] [Lee et al. 2023] [Lijewski 1988] [Lin et al. 1994] [Lombardi 1995] [McCutchen 1980] [McKlNNEY and DOLLYHlGH 1971] [Miner and Gloss 1975] [Mochizuki and Yamada 2018] [Moul and Wineman 1952] [Nicholas et al. 1984] [Numerical and Experimental Determination 2019] [Oelker and Hummel 1989] [Paulson and Thomas 1978] [Paulson and Thomas 1979] [Paulson et al. 1979] [Qin et al. 2017] [Selberg and Cronin 1985] [Shankar and Malmuth 1982] [Shankar and Malmuth 1983] [Shankar et al. 1981] [Shrivastava and Mohite 2015] [Silton and Fresconi 2015] [Silton et al. 2014] [Smeltzer et al. 1983] [Stark 1989] [Stoll and Koenig 1983] [Szklarski and Głębocki 2025] [Tahani et al. 2017] [Theerthamalai et al. 2025] [Thomas et al. 1978] [Thompson 1992] [Ting et al. 2014a] [Tu 1992c] [Tu 1994a] [Tu 1994b] [Tu 1991] [Tu 1992a] [Tu 1992b] [Tu and VanDalsem 1996] [Varun and Dwivedi 2022] [Wei et al. 2019] [Yip and Paulson 1977] [Yoo et al. 2023] [Yutuk et al. 2021] [Комаров and Зінченко 2019]

Structural mechanics, buckling and structural weight

The structural mechanics of plates, beams and shells, structural weight estimation, and the design and test of aircraft structures.

83 records. [Abdullah et al. 2019] [Acoustic Emissions and Transient 1989] [Aggarwal and Cranch 1967] [Ascani 1974] [Ashton 1970] [Becker 1992] [Berezhnitskii and Denisyuk 1985] [Bogan 1981] [Brigham et al. 1973] [Broglio 1957] [Clay and Rockafellow 1973] [Cohen 1982] [Cuschieri 1990] [Cutchins and Purvis 1982] [Davis 1973] [Design of an Aircraft Wing Structure for Static& Fatigue Life Prediction 2019] [Doi and Kataoka 1982] [Dooley 1965] [Dubigeon 1992] [Edwards 1963] [Effective Torsional Stiffness 1976] [Figge 1973] [Gilbert and Schneider 1981] [Grigolyuk and Kulikov 1990] [Harpur 1968] [Hayase 1974] [Hayashi 1949] [Hiyama 1974] [Horsburgh 1911] [Horton and Mayers 1965] [Hu 1984] [Jaeger and Hendry 1959] [Jensen et al. 1966] [Johnson 1973] [Johnson et al. 1962] [Kalnins 1968] [Kaloerov 1983] [Karniadakis 2004] [Kataoka et al. 1986] [Kosmodamianskii and Mitrakov 1976] [Kuang et al. 2025] [Kuznetsov and Kartashov 1980] [Lee 1995] [Liang et al. 2024a] [Lyubchak and Fil’shtinskii 1982] [Mansour 1970] [Meglinskii 1966] [Micks 1950] [Miller 1965] [Moriya 1982] [Padovan and Gosset 1974] [Parbery and Karihaloo 1980] [Parbery∗ and Olhoff 1987] [Peck and Hudson 1956] [Perry and Rievley 1961] [Reddy 1982] [Robinson 2004] [Sciuva 1992] [Seraj and Ganesan 2018] [Shanley 1943] [Shi and Bezine 1988] [Simmonds 1971] [Somashekar et al. 1987] [Structural Fundamentals 1955] [Sugimoto and Saito 1968] [Sugimoto and Saito 1969] [Tahraoui 1994] [Tan 1988] [Tang 1972] [Toader 1987] [Wagg 2022] [Wang 2024b] [Wasson and Mehus 1967] [Wickman 1953] [Wildermuth et al. 1974a] [Wildermuth et al. 1974b] [Williams 1952] [Winny 1950] [Wu 1976] [Wu and Chiu 1992] [Yamasaki and Gotoh 1971] [Zadvornyak and Martynovich 1983] [Zhang et al. 2026a]

Machine learning and data-driven modelling

Machine learning, surrogate and reduced-order models and reinforcement learning applied to aerodynamics, structures and flight control.

81 records. [Abouheaf et al. 2020] [Baldan and Guardone 2024] [Beitalmal 2025] [Benyamen et al. 2024] [Cai et al. 2026] [Caixeta and Marques 2018] [Cao and Lu 2024] [Cao et al. 2026] [Chen et al. 2020c] [Choi et al. 2023] [Cui et al. 2021] [Data-Driven Model-Free Adaptive Control 2016] [Divakar and Samaga 2026] [D’Amico et al. 2025] [d’Apolito and Sulzbachner 2021] [Fan et al. 2026] [Fina and Bisagni 2026] [Ghazi et al. 2022] [Golombek et al. 2026] [Gong et al. 2019b] [Haeri and Fadaee 2016] [Halder et al. 2020a] [Han et al. 2023] [Han et al. 2024] [Grauer 2018] [Jianhong and Ramirez-Mendoza 2023] [Kanou and Ibuki 2025] [Khodaverdian et al. 2025] [Kirsch et al. 2025] [Kou and Zhang 2021] [Lerro et al. 2020] [Liao et al. 2021] [Lindhorst et al. 2015] [Liu and Liu 2025] [Liu and Zhao 2026] [Maiworm et al. 2021] [Moni et al. 2024] [Monshizadeh 2020] [Na and Lee 2024] [Nagy and Fossati 2022] [Nan et al. 2024] [Peyada and Ghosh 2023] [Raiola et al. 2021] [Restifo et al. 2026] [Richter et al. 2024] [Alwan and Hussain 2026] [Kandasamy et al. 2018] [Seres et al. 2023] [Setiawarman and Sasongko 2026] [Shukla et al. 2025] [Toloei and Ghaderi 2026] [Tong et al. 2025] [Torregrosa et al. 2022] [Uzun et al. 2023] [van Waarde 2022] [Volpe et al. 2026] [Wada et al. 2020] [Walker and Claudio 2024] [Wang and Zhou 2026] [Wang et al. 2026d] [Wang et al. 2026b] [Wei and Freris 2024] [Wei et al. 2024] [White and Hartl 2025] [Wilson and Riccardi 2022] [Xia et al. 2026] [Xu et al. 2024] [Xu et al. 2026b] [Yan et al. 2019] [Yang et al. 2026b] [Yonekura and Suzuki 2021] [Yoo et al. 2021] [Yuan and Zhou 2024] [Zhang et al. 2021b] [Zhang et al. 2022b] [Zhang et al. 2026e] [Zhao et al. 2024c] [Zhao et al. 2024b] [Zhiqiang et al. 2016] [Zhou et al. 2024] [Zhou et al. 2025c]

All 81 records date from 2015 or later.

Lift, induced drag and aerodynamic estimation

Lift-curve slope, induced drag and its minimum, flow-control effectors used for flight control and load alleviation, and the estimation of aerodynamic coefficients and the data compendia that tabulate them.

64 records. [AbuNawas and Qawasmeh 2026] [Aerodynamic Performance of Swayasa 2025] [Ando and Yashiro 1976] [Ashill 1970] [Bay and Kara 2026] [Bouton 1950] [Burkett 1989] [Butler 1982] [Butler 1983] [Chen and Mangione 1967] [Coe and Kulla 1974] [Finck 1978] [Frost and Rutherford 1963] [GlBBINGS 1969] [Gu et al. 2023] [Haftka 1977] [Hancock 1971] [Hancock 1972] [Hemsch and Nielsen 1983] [Kendall 1985] [Khalil et al. 2022] [Kida 1982] [Klein and Viswanathan 1973] [Kroo 1982] [Laitone 1978] [Laitone 1989] [Lakshminarayana 1962] [Lam 1993] [Lan 1986] [Li et al. 2018a] [Li et al. 2018c] [Lockwood Taylor 1942] [Lombardi and Vicini 1994] [Loth and Boyle 1969] [Lowe 1988] [Lowson 1990] [Lundry 1967] [Lundry 1977] [Lyapunov 1993] [Mahdavi Zafarghandi and Reza Soltani 2024] [Nangia et al. 2003] [Nonweiler 1960] [Pangas and Gamboa 2025] [Report No. 121 1921] [Report No. 349. 1930] [Roskam et al. 1972] [Sanders 1965] [Shmilovich and Princen 2026] [Sibert 1937] [Sibert 1943] [Smith et al. 2001] [Stanbrook 1954] [Sugimoto 1992] [Tormalm et al. 2018] [Vukelich et al. 1988] [Weihs and Katz 1986] [Weisshaar 1977] [White et al. 2015] [Xu and Feng 2025] [Xu and Zha 2021] [Yamamoto 1992] [Zeleke et al. 2023] [Zhai et al. 2020] [Zhijie et al. 2025]

Relaxed static stability and the unstable airframe

Relaxed static stability, active control technology, the neutral point and the identification of unstable aircraft.

62 records. [Accelerated Development and Flight 1979] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1990a] [Anderson et al. 1973] [Ashkenas and Klyde 1989] [Blight et al. 1986] [Boudreau 1977] [Buffington 1999a] [Crowe 1937] [Curtiss 1971] [Curtiss and Howard C. 1961] [Enns et al. 1992] [Gilbert 1987] [Guinn 1984] [Guinn et al. 1983] [Guinn et al. 1984] [Hanson and Stengel 1984] [Hanson and Stengel 1981] [Hanson and Stengel 1983] [Jategaonkar and Thielecke 1994] [Klein et al. 1982] [Kurzhals 1978] [Kuttieri and Sinha 2023] [Kwatny et al. 1991] [Lapins et al. 1982] [Li et al. 2016a] [Li et al. 2022a] [Maine and Murray 1988] [McRuer et al. 1986] [Moorhouse and Jenkins 1975] [Moul and Brown 1959] [Nagabhushan 1991] [Naihong et al. 1993] [Nguyen et al. 1979] [Perry 1976] [Perry 1982] [Preissler and Schaufele 1991] [Ramamoorthy 1992] [Rediess and Szalai 1975] [Rising et al. 1984] [Roache 1965] [Roberts et al. 1977] [Rodgers 1965] [Rodgers 1966] [Rooney et al. 1982] [Sachs 1977] [Shrivastava and Stengel 1989] [Shrivastava 1987] [Sizlo et al. 1979] [Sliwa 1980] [Smith et al. 1971] [Solies 1994a] [Solies 1994b] [Swaim 1970] [Teel 1999b] [Teel 1999a] [Tomlinson 1973] [Walker 1976] [Wilhelm and Schafranek 1986] [Yang et al. 2016b] [Yin et al. 2019] [Zhang et al. 2026b] [Zhou et al. 2022a]

52 of the 62 records date from 1995 or earlier, which is the shape a settled subject takes.

Structural health monitoring and the digital twin

Structural health monitoring, model updating and the digital twin.

51 records. [Al-Hussein and Haldar 2015] [Broer et al. 2022] [Büchter et al. 2021] [Chabod and Baron 2020] [Chen et al. 2015b] [Choi et al. 2017] [de Medeiros et al. 2017] [Deng et al. 2024a] [Di Sante 2015] [Galiana et al. 2024] [Gao et al. 2017] [Gao et al. 2021] [Giannakeas et al. 2022] [Hervin and Fromme 2022] [Houzibe and Chaki 2026] [Ibrahim 2026] [Jeon et al. 2025] [Kabashkin 2024] [Karuskevich et al. 2022] [Kim and Youn 2025] [Kong et al. 2025] [Kwon et al. 2019] [Mei and Giurgiutiu 2018] [Ochôa et al. 2019] [Oyarhossein et al. 2025] [Pedrioli et al. 2026] [Petriconi et al. 2026] [Philibert et al. 2022] [Qiu et al. 2017] [Qiu et al. 2018] [Ren and Lissenden 2016] [Ren et al. 2017] [Ren et al. 2018] [Romano et al. 2019] [Sen and Bhattacharya 2016] [Sharqi and Cesnik 2023] [Si and Baier 2016] [Sugumaran 2024] [Walker and Kaufman 1977] [Wang et al. 2018b] [Wang et al. 2019e] [Wang et al. 2020a] [Wang et al. 2021h] [Wang et al. 2023b] [White et al. 2017] [Wilson et al. 2024] [Yue et al. 2021] [Yunker et al. 2024] [Zhou et al. 2025b] [Zhou et al. 2026a] [Zhou et al. 2026c]

Topology optimisation and additive manufacture

Additive manufacture, lattice structures and topology optimisation of aerospace components.

41 records. [Abc 2023] [Ackermann and Haase 2023] [Agrawal et al. 2022] [Bester 2023] [Boado-Cuartero et al. 2024] [Cannella et al. 2018] [Carneiro and Gamboa 2019] [Cheng et al. 2019] [Chougule and Sonawane 2017] [Dagkolu et al. 2021] [Daynes 2024] [Di Caprio et al. 2019] [Dzhurynskyi 2026] [Geng et al. 2026] [Hu 2022] [Jia et al. 2026] [Kalms and Bergmann 2020] [Kambampati et al. 2020] [Khan and Riccio 2024] [Kumar et al. 2020] [Lee and Yun 2022] [Li et al. 2016c] [Li et al. 2021c] [Li et al. 2025e] [Li et al. 2026d] [Liu et al. 2022b] [Lomo et al. 2023] [Mei et al. 2021] [Nguyen 2019] [Obilanade et al. 2025] [Oshima and Takano 2024] [Pierre et al. 2023] [Su et al. 2025] [Tsushima et al. 2021a] [Wang 2021] [Wang and Song 2025] [Wang and Xia 2022] [Wang et al. 2021j] [Wang et al. 2022b] [Zhang et al. 2025b] [Zhao et al. 2022]

All 41 records date from 2016 or later.

Uncertainty quantification and reliability

Uncertainty quantification, reliability and robust design optimisation.

35 records. [Ballester Claret et al. 2024] [Bhachu et al. 2015] [Chatterjee et al. 2019] [Cheng et al. 2015] [Da Ronch et al. 2019] [Elyasi et al. 2020] [Geisler and Junker 2024] [Gong et al. 2026] [Hanazaki and Yamazaki 2024] [Hozić et al. 2023] [Jagana et al. 2026] [McGurk et al. 2024] [Missoum 2012] [Savin and Hantrais-Gervois 2020] [Sharma et al. 2023] [Sleesongsom et al. 2022] [Sofi 2015] [Song and Mignolet 2018] [Spagnol et al. 2019] [Suryawanshi and Ghosh 2015] [Thanusha and Sarkar 2016] [Thomas and Dowell 2025] [Tsai and Malak 2024] [van den Brandt and de Visser 2018] [Vermiglio 2017] [Wang and Qing 2016] [Wang et al. 2025l] [Wansaseub et al. 2020] [Wauters 2021] [Wei and Du 2019] [Xia et al. 2016] [Xie et al. 2021] [Zhao and Zhou 2024] [Zhou et al. 2019c] [Özdemir 2021]

The Southwell method, Rayleigh-Ritz and assumed modes

The Southwell method of predicting a critical load from subcritical measurement, and the Rayleigh-Ritz and assumed-modes methods of the article’s structural model.

28 records. [An Anal Ysis 1974] [Ariaratnam 1961] [Craver and Egle 1972] [Crisfield 1978] [Dawe and Roufaeil 1980] [Deobald and Gibson 1988] [Gelos and Laura 1990] [Gorman and Singhal 1993] [Hatake 1985] [Hatake 1986] [Kalam 1981] [Koh and Kelly 1989] [Lam et al. 1989] [Laura and Viazzi 1985] [Leicester 1970] [Liew and Wang 1993] [Lim et al. 1989] [Roorda 1967] [Roufaeil and Dawe 1982] [Savithri and Varadan 1990] [Singer 1989] [Singhvi and Kapania 1994] [Southwell et al. 1981] [Spencer and Walker 1975] [Valsangkar et al. 1982] [Walker and Hall 1968] [Wang and Thevendran 1993] [Wang et al. 1994]

None of the 28 records is later than 1994. Nine titles name the Southwell method, and none of them names a wing, an aircraft or flight.

Manoeuvre performance, agility and energy methods

Manoeuvre performance, agility, energy methods and the minimum-time climb.

18 records. [Bryson et al. 1969] [Calise 1977] [Flight Performance Handbook 1963] [Friend and Sakamoto 1978] [Godwin et al. 1964] [Hallissy and Ayers 1977] [Johnson 1972] [Liefer 1990] [Nguyen and Gilert 1990] [Papadales and Basil S. 1979] [Ray et al. 1972] [Ray et al. 1973] [Shayak et al. 2024] [Tamboli 1956] [Theodorsen 1959] [Well and Berger 1982] [Wood and Livingston 1971] [Wrestler and Clifton G. 1965]

Where the Framing Breaks Down

The keystone inversion rests on a single quoted figure, and the figure is a prediction rather than a measurement. The elastic-to-rigid ratio of 1.6 is described in the source as predicted, so the divergence dynamic pressure derived from it is the boundary the designers believed in and not the one the aircraft had [Sims et al. 1989]. The flight record says the real boundary was lower [Hicks and Matheny 1987]. Every number in this article that descends from 4,533 pounds per square foot inherits that, and it matters most in the Southwell sensitivity analysis, because that analysis uses the same figure to describe how well the figure could have been measured.

The elasticity derived earlier puts a number on that rounding.

\[\frac{\Delta q_D}{q_D} \approx -\frac{1}{r-1}\cdot\frac{\Delta r}{r} = -1.667 \times \left(\pm\frac{0.05}{1.6}\right) = \mp 5.2\ \mathrm{percent} \tag{69}\]

The ratio is also quoted as about 1.6, and the rounding is not harmless. At 1.55 the implied boundary is 4,791 pounds per square foot and at 1.65 it is 4,315, a spread of about ten percent from a figure given to two significant figures. The margin of 2.667 is really a margin between about 2.54 and 2.82.

The two-mode structural model is a scaling argument and nothing more. It uses strip theory, neglects compressibility, neglects the canard’s downwash entirely on a wing whose inboard loading is strongly influenced by that downwash [Sims et al. 1989], and assumes a uniform wing where the real structural box transitions from unswept to swept. Its absolute numbers are meaningless and are never quoted. The results taken from it are the sweep trend, the coupling requirement and the elimination threshold, all of which are ratios.

The pitch inertia is assumed and the doubling times scale as its square root. A factor of two error in inertia is a factor of 1.41 in every time in that table.

The trim comparison assumes a section pitching moment that was never published, and the taper ratio behind the transonic argument is likewise assumed. Both are stated in their tables as sensitivities for that reason.

The question that would have tested the planform hardest was answered late, and against it. The supersonic drag was not measured in the preliminary phase, because afterburner fuel flow was not instrumented [Hicks and Huckabine 1989]. When the later report extended the lift and drag data to Mach 1.3, it found greater transonic shock losses than in two contemporary fighters and higher supersonic lift-related drag than in all three [Saltzman et al. 1994]. The forward-swept wing’s transonic case therefore did not survive the flight data that could test it.

And the largest limitation is not technical. The programme was a success by its own criteria and the configuration was never adopted. An article organised around whether the aeroplane worked will conclude that it did and will miss the fact that this changed nothing about how aircraft are shaped.

The Source Base

This is the best-documented subject in this series in a long while, and the contrast with the X-27 and the X-28 is the point.

The vehicle’s own record is deep. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Technical Reports Server returns a large body of work under the aircraft’s own designation, including the preliminary flight assessment, the structural loads flight testing, the flight-determined lift and drag characteristics, the flight control system lessons learned, the buffet and control system interaction, and the canard and control system interaction. This subject’s literature is found under the aircraft’s own name, which is the reverse of the X-27 and the X-28, whose designations carry essentially no literature of their own and whose evidence lies in the physics beneath them.

Two primary documents carry most of the quantitative content of this article. The preliminary flight assessment supplies the control system description, the static margin, the update rate and the Southwell application. The structural loads flight testing paper supplies the planform geometry, which the flight test overview of Hicks and Huckabine 1989 also gives, the structural axis sweep, the elastic-to-rigid ratio, the design dynamic pressure and the canard torsion axis location. The keystone result exists because those two figures appear in the same paragraph of the same report.

The vehicle facts nonetheless disagree between secondary sources, principally on the number of flights each aircraft made and on the total for the programme. The article reports the disagreement rather than choosing.

The physics record is deeper still and long predates the aircraft. Divergence, aeroelastic tailoring, relaxed static stability and digital flight control each have substantial primary literatures, and the wind tunnel divergence experiments on forward-swept wings that the flight programme cites are themselves a well-documented body of work.

The research survey holds 3,201 research records drawn from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Technical Reports Server, the Defense Technical Information Center and the journal literature indexed by Crossref, of which 709 are report primaries, being 22.1 percent, by the identifier rule set out under The Definition of Primary. The median publication year is 2017. Of the 3,199 dated records, 1,196 were published in 1995 or earlier, the period of the aircraft’s design, flight programme and reports, being 37.4 percent, and 1,840 were published in 2015 or later, being 57.5 percent.

The Definition of Primary

Primacy is a property of the document, and this survey derives it from the identifier. A record is a report primary when its address is on the NASA Technical Reports Server or it carries a digital object identifier under the 10.21236 prefix, which Crossref registers for Defense Technical Information Center reports. Of the 76 titles that name the X-29, 67 are report primaries, which is what the aircraft’s own record looks like under that rule. The rule does not reach the journal papers, such as the divergence and tailoring papers of the Journal of Aircraft, so 22.1 percent is a lower bound on how much of the survey is first-hand.

Thin Subjects

Writing an equation down creates a citation obligation for the mechanics beneath it, and the mechanics are not the same literature as the technology. The survey therefore holds, beside the literature of the aircraft’s technologies, clusters on the Southwell method and assumed modes, on sampled-data control and time delay, and on divergence and static aeroelasticity. Ten subjects that this article’s derivations depend on nonetheless have thin literatures. Each count below is the number of research records in this survey whose title carries at least one of the listed terms, with a hyphen read as a space. Where a row joins two groups of terms with the word together, a title must carry a term from each group.

Subject Title terms counted Records
the time to double of an unstable airframe time to double, doubling time, time to half 0
the elastic-to-rigid lift ratio elastic to rigid, flexible to rigid, rigid to flexible, lift effectiveness 0
washin of a swept wing under load washin, wash in 0
isobar sweep isobar, isobars 0
torsion of a canard canard, canards together with torsion, torsional, spindle, pitch stiffness 0
sustained turning performance sustained turn, specific excess power, excess thrust, excess power 0
the laminate stiffness matrix positive definite, stiffness matrix 0
the Southwell method applied to a wing or in flight Southwell together with wing, aeroelastic, divergence, flight, flutter, aircraft 0
divergence measured in flight divergence together with flight 1
failure voting in a redundant control system voter, voters, voting 2

Most of the quantities the derivations turn on are never the subject of a title. No title names the time to double of an unstable airframe, the elastic-to-rigid lift ratio, washin of a swept wing under load, isobar sweep or torsion of a canard. Each appears in this literature, if at all, inside work titled by its subject, being unstable airframe control, static aeroelasticity, transonic wing design and canard aerodynamics, so the article’s figures for them stand on the relations derived above.

The Southwell method has a literature, and it is not about wings. Nine titles name it, and none names a wing, an aircraft or flight. They treat the method itself, columns and beam-columns, buried flexible pipes and plastic buckling, which agrees with the primary record’s statement that the X-29 was the first aircraft to which it was applied in flight.

Divergence measured in flight is the subject of one title, a 1988 report of flight test experience with the structural divergence of forward-swept wings, the configuration the X-29 flew.

Failure voting appears in two titles, from 1977 and 1993, while the redundancy literature itself is large, with 274 records in the cluster on digital fly-by-wire, redundancy and fault tolerance. The argument that redundancy on this aircraft was a question about time rests on the article’s own arithmetic rather than on a published analysis of voter latency.

No research record carries sustained turn, specific excess power or excess thrust in its title, and the work is not missing. It lives under energy state, energy manoeuvrability and time to climb, the vocabulary the period actually used, and 6 titles name energy state, energy manoeuvrability, energy methods or the time to climb.

No research record carries positive definite or stiffness matrix in its title either, because the mechanics of the bend-twist coupling matrix are written up inside the composite structure literature, where 394 of this article’s research records carry composite or composites in their titles, and inside the aeroelastic tailoring literature, where 74 carry tailored or tailoring in theirs. A paper on tailoring a wing is a paper about that stiffness matrix, and reporting a gap there would misdescribe where the work is.

What the Survey Admits

A record is admitted only when a person reading its title finds it on this article’s subject. Several words this subject depends on also name something else, and a record that shares only such a word is excluded. Southwell is also the name of the Jesuit poet Robert Southwell, of Southwell Cathedral and of a cestode parasite of the Indian shad. Canard also names the duck, in poultry science and cookery, and a false story. Agility also names a quality of military doctrine and of enterprise management, and divergence names quantities in intracranial pressure, meteorology, statistics and economics. Flutter also names the motion of paper sheets, air-cushion skirts and planing plates, and transonic also describes compressors, fans and turbines. Control, vehicle and fault tolerance also name automotive suspension, steering and braking, ships and submarines, power converters and electric motors, industrial robots and cranes, chemical reactors, civil structures, supply chains, airfares and flight delays. Spacecraft, rockets and launch vehicles, missile guidance, and helicopter rotors and helicopter test reports share the vocabulary of aeroelasticity, stability and control without sharing this aircraft’s problem, and records about them alone are excluded, as are insect, bird and bat flight and the notch filters of power electronics and signal processing. Flow-control, drag-reduction and lift-augmentation devices on wings and sections are excluded unless the record concerns vortex flow at high angle of attack, shock control within transonic section design, buffet, or a flight-control or load-alleviation effect. So are engine, inlet, nacelle and nozzle hardware, marine and tidal hydrodynamics, store carriage and separation, fuel tanks, landing gear, icing, lightning protection and crashworthiness, the inspection and fatigue of metal airframes, propeller, proprotor and turbomachinery blades, and wind-turbine rotors other than their bend-twist coupling, because the argument uses none of them. Program listings, user and programmer’s manuals, textbook chapters on general mathematics, and conference volumes and their front matter are excluded as items rather than research works. Civil structures, reliability theory and digital-twin frameworks that name no aircraft, the numerical analysis of approximation methods, and rotorcraft subsystems are excluded as well, while structural model updating stays admitted. Correction, errata, retraction and withdrawal notices, retracted articles, book reviews, conference announcements, news items and reference entries are excluded as well, because a survey counts research works and those are notices attached to works rather than works. Where the same document is registered twice, as a digest and as the paper or under two identifiers for one paper, one record is kept.

Some records of doubtful relevance are kept. Generic control, estimation and optimisation theory, structural mechanics theory, quadrotor and other unmanned-vehicle flight control, networked control theory, bridge and hydrofoil flutter, marine and wind-turbine bend-twist coupling, canard and high angle of attack aerodynamics of missiles, and rotorcraft handling qualities each share the mathematics or the vocabulary of the aircraft’s structural, aerodynamic or control problem, so each is kept and a reader may weigh it accordingly.

Every research title has been read for relevance, so the off-topic share that remains is a matter of reading judgement. A reading of titles cannot show that a work is relevant in substance, so this is a statement about titles only.

Epistemic State

Historical fact, well attested.

  • The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency began the X-29A project in 1977 [Hicks and Matheny 1987].
  • The aircraft was designed and built by the Grumman Aerospace Corporation and flown at the Dryden Flight Research Facility [Hicks and Matheny 1987].
  • Two aircraft were built, the first flying on 14 December 1984 [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Gelzer 2015].
  • The wing has a leading edge swept 29.3 degrees forward, a structural axis swept 36.2 degrees forward, an aspect ratio of 4.0 and a trapezoidal reference area of 185 square feet [Hicks and Huckabine 1989] [Sims et al. 1989] [Saltzman et al. 1994]. The figure of 188.84 square feet in the encyclopaedia entry [Grumman X-29] is the exposed wing area [Saltzman et al. 1994].
  • The wing skins are graphite-epoxy composite, aeroelastically tailored to inhibit structural divergence [Hicks and Matheny 1987].
  • The static margin is nominally 35 percent negative subsonically, and the instability is created by the canard rather than by the wing [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Sims et al. 1989].
  • The flight control system is triplex digital fly-by-wire updating at 40 hertz, with digital and analog reversionary modes [Hicks and Matheny 1987].
  • Pitch control is by three surfaces, namely the all-moving canard, the dual-hinged full-span flaperons, and the aft strake flaps [Hicks and Matheny 1987].
  • The canard area is 20 percent of the wing reference area [Sims et al. 1989].
  • The airframe reuses the forward fuselage and nose gear of an F-5A, the main landing gear and servo-actuators of an F-16, and F-14 avionics [Hicks and Huckabine 1989].
  • Envelope expansion was completed in 84 flights over two years [Hicks and Matheny 1987].
  • The Southwell technique was applied to flight test data for the first time on this aircraft [Hicks and Matheny 1987].

Reported in the primary literature and taken as given here.

  • That the predicted elastic-to-rigid wing lift-curve-slope ratio was about 1.6 at the design dynamic pressure of 1,700 pounds per square foot [Sims et al. 1989].
  • That induced drag in flight was as much as 20 percent below wind tunnel estimates above a lift coefficient of 0.8 [Hicks and Huckabine 1989].
  • That the X-29A’s subsonic lifting efficiency was about average and about equal to that of the F-15C, F-16C and F/A-18, while its transonic shock losses and supersonic lift-related drag were higher [Saltzman et al. 1994].
  • That the programme did not demonstrate the overall drag reduction earlier studies had suggested [Gelzer 2015] [Jenkins, Landis and Miller].
  • That the flight-estimated divergence speed was lower than predicted but remained outside the flight envelope [Hicks and Matheny 1987].
  • That canard torsion loads exceeded predictions transonically and were not fully understood [Hicks and Matheny 1987].
  • That the tailored skins carried an insignificant weight penalty over the basic strength design [Sims et al. 1989].

Contested in the sources and left contested.

Engineering analysis, computed here and reproducible from the stated inputs.

  • The divergence dynamic pressure of 4,533 pounds per square foot, inverted from the elastic-to-rigid ratio, and the margins of 2.667 in dynamic pressure and 1.633 in equivalent airspeed.
  • The agreement to 0.24 percent between the quoted design dynamic pressure and the same condition recomputed from the quoted Mach number and altitude.
  • The agreement to better than 0.01 percent between the quoted span and the span implied by the quoted aspect ratio and reference area.
  • The lift amplification against dynamic pressure.
  • The sweep trend of the divergence boundary, and the critical sweepback of 48.013 degrees beyond which the boundary disappears entirely in this model, obtained in closed form and confirmed by bisection on an independent determinant scan.
  • The bend-twist coupling of 0.627 required to reach the observed margin, and of 0.812 to remove the boundary, together with their insensitivity to the assumed stiffness ratio.
  • The Southwell sensitivity, and that the error in the estimated boundary is about 1.4 times the twist measurement error at the aircraft’s own reach.
  • The pitch doubling times, the frames available at 40 hertz, and the 37.5 millisecond sampled delay.
  • The triplex loss probabilities and the fraction of a doubling time consumed by failure isolation.
  • That an aft-swept wing needs 15.40 degrees more leading edge sweep to match the isobar sweep, and that its structural box is about three percent longer on that basis.
  • The trim drag ratio of 1.331 between an aft tail and a canard at the stated moment and arm.

Inference, labelled as such.

  • The canard’s boundary set by pitch-loop stiffness is the aircraft’s most general finding. The primary record states the fact in one sentence and draws no conclusion from it [Sims et al. 1989].
  • The 40 hertz rate was chosen against the doubling time rather than for convenience. The ratio is compelling and no source says so directly.

Not established.

  • The wing’s actual bending and torsional stiffnesses, its ply layup, or its realised coupling.
  • The aircraft’s pitch inertia, on which every doubling time depends.
  • The measured divergence boundary, as distinct from the predicted one.
  • The section pitching moment and the taper ratio, both assumed.
  • Whether the configuration would have offered a net advantage in a production aircraft.

Out of Scope

  • The Sukhoi Su-47 and the Hansa Jet, the other flying forward-swept aircraft, referenced here only as context.
  • The Junkers Ju 287, the first jet forward-swept aircraft, treated only as precedent.
  • The detailed high angle of attack results from the second aircraft, which are a programme of their own.
  • The HiMAT programme, from whose competition the aerofoil section came.
  • Composite laminate mechanics in detail, surveyed here rather than derived.
  • Digital control theory, which the references cover.

Conclusion

The X-29 was built to find out whether a wing that wants to tear itself off can be talked out of it, and the answer is yes, at a price that can be computed.

The price was most of the bend-twist coupling a laminate can physically supply. Reaching the aircraft’s actual divergence margin required a coupling ratio of about 0.63 against a hard bound of 1.0, and that requirement holds across the plausible range of the stiffnesses the record does not give. The technology worked and it was not working easily.

The margin itself was smaller than it sounds. A factor of 2.667 in dynamic pressure is a factor of 1.633 in speed, and at the design point the wing was already amplifying its lift by sixty percent. Between three thousand and four thousand pounds per square foot that amplification triples. The aircraft lived on the flat part of a curve that has no flat part near its end.

The control system’s problem was the same problem in a different currency. At the corner of the envelope the airframe doubled a pitch disturbance in about a tenth of a second, which is four frames at forty hertz, of which the act of sampling consumed thirty-seven milliseconds. A voter needing three frames to isolate a failed channel spent three quarters of a doubling time doing it. Redundancy on this aircraft was a question about time rather than about probability, the finding most worth carrying forward.

And the two halves were never separable, which the aircraft demonstrated in the most direct way available. The canard’s own divergence boundary was set not by its spindle but by the stiffness of the pitch loop that a control law required. A control requirement fixed a structural boundary. The programme was organised as a structures problem and a controls problem, and the aeroplane declined to be divided that way.

The planform lost and everything it forced won. Its drag case did not survive the flight data, which showed lifting efficiency no better than that of contemporary fighters and greater shock losses at Mach 0.9 [Saltzman et al. 1994]. No production fighter flies a forward-swept wing [Forward-swept wing]. Aeroelastic tailoring, deep static instability, and real-time redundancy management are all ordinary. The X-29 is the rare research aircraft whose most visible feature was the least important thing it proved.

And it ends a run. After an autogyro, a sailplane, a fighter that was never built and a five-thousand-dollar flying boat, the X-29 is a purpose-built research aeroplane funded by an agency to answer a question nobody could answer another way. That is what the designation was for, and this is the first time in five articles that it meant it.

The next article treats the X-30, the National Aero-Space Plane, which asked a question larger than any aircraft in this series and never flew at all.

Equations

This section collects the 69 display equations of the article in the order they appear, each under its number and reproduced exactly as it stands in the text. A title in bold names an established result, and a title in italics beginning with the word Bespoke names a construction made for this analysis. Of the 69, 41 are established and 28 are bespoke. Weights are in pounds, dynamic pressures in pounds per square foot and stiffnesses in foot-pounds, while times are in seconds and sample rates in hertz, and several letters change meaning between sections, so $e$ is a moment arm in the divergence relations and the span efficiency in the drag relations, $\lambda$ is the unstable pitch root in the doubling-time relations and the taper ratio in the planform relations, and $\eta$ is the fractional span station, the section efficiency in the lift-curve slope and, as $\eta_{cp}$, the centre of pressure station.

Equation 1, Wing Loading at the Maximum Gross Weight. The wing loading is the maximum takeoff gross weight divided by the reference area, evaluated from the published figures. Raymer

\[\frac{W}{S} = \frac{17{,}800\ \mathrm{lb}}{185\ \mathrm{ft}^2} = 96.22\ \mathrm{lb/ft^2} \tag{1}\]

Equation 2, Bespoke Thrust-to-Weight Ratio at the Maximum Gross Weight. The thrust-to-weight ratio takes the engine class rating of 16,000 pounds as the thrust, a substitute the article chooses because the record gives no installed thrust.

\[\frac{T}{W} = \frac{16{,}000\ \mathrm{lb}}{17{,}800\ \mathrm{lb}} = 0.899 \tag{2}\]

Equation 3, Bespoke Thrust-to-Weight Ratio at the Manoeuvre Design Weight. The same class rating divided by the manoeuvre design gross weight gives a ratio above one, again taking the uninstalled rating as the thrust.

\[\left.\frac{T}{W}\right|_{\mathrm{manoeuvre}} = \frac{16{,}000\ \mathrm{lb}}{15{,}000\ \mathrm{lb}} = 1.067 \tag{3}\]

Equation 4, Canard Area From the Quoted Percentage. The canard area is the quoted twenty percent of the wing reference area, which matches the figure in the later lift and drag report. Saltzman et al. 1994

\[S_c = 0.20\,S = 0.20 \times 185\ \mathrm{ft}^2 = 37.00\ \mathrm{ft}^2 \tag{4}\]

Equation 5, Canard Mean Chord From the Quoted Percentage. The canard mean aerodynamic chord is the quoted seventy-six percent of the wing mean aerodynamic chord.

\[\bar{c}_c = 0.76\,\bar{c} = 0.76 \times 7.217\ \mathrm{ft} = 5.485\ \mathrm{ft} \tag{5}\]

Equation 6, Wing Load at the Subsonic Design Limit. The limit load is the subsonic design load factor of eight multiplied by the manoeuvre design gross weight. Sims et al. 1989

\[n W = 8.0 \times 15{,}000\ \mathrm{lb} = 120{,}000\ \mathrm{lb} \tag{6}\]

Equation 7, Fuel Fraction at the Maximum Gross Weight. The fuel fraction is the published fuel load divided by the maximum takeoff gross weight.

\[\frac{W_{\mathrm{fuel}}}{W_{\max}} = \frac{4{,}000\ \mathrm{lb}}{17{,}800\ \mathrm{lb}} = 0.225 \tag{7}\]

Equation 8, Excess of the Heaviest Weight Flown Over the Design Weight. The heaviest gross weight flown exceeds the manoeuvre design gross weight by eighteen percent, as the record states. Sims et al. 1989

\[\frac{17{,}700}{15{,}000} - 1 = 0.180 \tag{8}\]

Equation 9, Span From Aspect Ratio and Reference Area. The span is the square root of aspect ratio times reference area, which reproduces the published reference span to better than one hundredth of a percent. Hicks and Huckabine 1989 Sims et al. 1989

\[b = \sqrt{A S} = \sqrt{4.0 \times 185\ \mathrm{ft}^2} = 27.20\ \mathrm{ft} \tag{9}\]

Equation 10, Elastic Amplification of the Lift-Curve Slope. For a single torsional degree of freedom the ratio of elastic to rigid lift-curve slope is one over one minus the ratio of dynamic pressure to divergence dynamic pressure.

\[\frac{C_{L_\alpha}^{\mathrm{elastic}}}{C_{L_\alpha}^{\mathrm{rigid}}} = \frac{1}{1 - q/q_D} \tag{10}\]

Equation 11, Torsional Moment Equilibrium of an Elastic Wing Section. The elastic restoring moment of the twisted section balances the aerodynamic moment of its lift acting a distance $e$ ahead of the elastic axis.

\[K_\theta\,\theta = q\,S\,e\,a\left(\alpha_0 + \theta\right) \tag{11}\]

Equation 12, Elastic Twist Under Aerodynamic Load. Solving the equilibrium for the twist exposes a denominator that vanishes when the aerodynamic moment slope equals the torsional stiffness.

\[\theta = \frac{q\,S\,e\,a\,\alpha_0}{K_\theta - q\,S\,e\,a} \tag{12}\]

Equation 13, Divergence Dynamic Pressure of a Torsional Section. The divergence dynamic pressure is the torsional stiffness divided by the product of area, moment arm and lift-curve slope.

\[q_D = \frac{K_\theta}{S\,e\,a} \tag{13}\]

Equation 14, Total Angle of Attack as an Amplified Rigid Value. Substituting the divergence dynamic pressure shows that the total angle of attack, and with it the lift, is the rigid value times the amplification factor.

\[\alpha_0 + \theta = \frac{\alpha_0}{1 - q/q_D} \tag{14}\]

Equation 15, Design Dynamic Pressure From Mach Number at Sea Level. The design point quoted as Mach 1.07 at sea level gives a dynamic pressure that agrees with the quoted 1,700 pounds per square foot to a quarter of a percent. Sims et al. 1989

\[q = \tfrac{1}{2} \rho_0 \left(M a_0\right)^2 = \tfrac{1}{2} \times 0.0023769 \times \left(1.07 \times 1116.45\ \mathrm{ft/s}\right)^2 = 1695.9\ \mathrm{lb/ft^2} \tag{15}\]

Equation 16, Divergence Boundary From the Amplification Ratio. Rearranging the amplification relation gives the divergence dynamic pressure from the flight dynamic pressure and the elastic-to-rigid ratio.

\[q_D = \frac{q}{1 - 1/r}, \qquad r = \frac{C_{L_\alpha}^{\mathrm{elastic}}}{C_{L_\alpha}^{\mathrm{rigid}}} \tag{16}\]

Equation 17, Bespoke Fraction of the Divergence Boundary at the Design Point. The published elastic-to-rigid ratio of 1.6 is passed through the single-degree-of-freedom amplification relation, an idealisation of the real wing that the article adopts, to place the design point at 0.375 of the boundary.

\[\frac{q}{q_D} = 1 - \frac{1}{1.6} = 0.375 \tag{17}\]

Equation 18, Bespoke Inverted Divergence Dynamic Pressure. Dividing the published design dynamic pressure by that fraction gives a divergence boundary of about 4,533 pounds per square foot, a figure the article derives through a relation neither source used.

\[q_D = \frac{1700\ \mathrm{lb/ft^2}}{0.375} = 4533\ \mathrm{lb/ft^2} \tag{18}\]

Equation 19, Bespoke Divergence Margin in Dynamic Pressure and Speed. The inverted boundary is stated as a margin of 2.667 in dynamic pressure and of its square root, 1.633, in speed.

\[\frac{q_D}{q_{\mathrm{design}}} = 2.667, \qquad \frac{V_D}{V_{\mathrm{design}}} = \sqrt{2.667} = 1.633 \tag{19}\]

Equation 20, Equivalent Airspeed. Dynamic pressure fixes the equivalent airspeed through sea-level density alone.

\[q = \tfrac{1}{2}\rho V^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}\rho_0 V_e^2, \qquad V_e = \sqrt{\frac{2q}{\rho_0}} \tag{20}\]

Equation 21, Bespoke Equivalent Airspeeds at the Design Point and the Boundary. The design and divergence dynamic pressures are expressed as equivalent airspeeds, the second resting on the inverted boundary.

\[V_{e,\mathrm{design}} = 709\ \mathrm{kt}, \qquad V_{e,D} = 1157\ \mathrm{kt} \tag{21}\]

Equation 22, Elasticity of the Boundary With Respect to the Ratio. Writing the inversion as a product shows that the logarithmic sensitivity of the boundary to the amplification ratio is minus one over the ratio less one.

\[q_D = \frac{q\,r}{r - 1} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad \frac{d \ln q_D}{d \ln r} = -\frac{1}{r - 1} \tag{22}\]

Equation 23, Elasticity Evaluated at the Published Ratio. At the published ratio of 1.6 a one percent error in the ratio becomes an error of 1.667 percent of opposite sign in the boundary.

\[\left.\frac{d \ln q_D}{d \ln r}\right|_{r = 1.6} = -\frac{1}{0.6} = -1.667 \tag{23}\]

Equation 24, Streamwise Angle-of-Attack Change of a Swept Elastic Wing. Resolving the elastic twist and the bending slope onto the streamwise direction shows that bending adds washin on a forward-swept wing and washout on an aft-swept one. Bisplinghoff, Ashley and Halfman

\[\Delta\alpha(y) = \theta(y)\cos\Lambda - w'(y)\sin\Lambda \tag{24}\]

Equation 25, Coupled Bending-Torsion Constitutive Law. The bending moment and torque are related to curvature and rate of twist by a symmetric stiffness matrix whose off-diagonal term is the bend-twist coupling.

\[\begin{Bmatrix} M \\ T \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} EI & K \\ K & GJ \end{bmatrix} \begin{Bmatrix} w'' \\ \theta' \end{Bmatrix} \tag{25}\]

Equation 26, Bespoke Two-Mode Divergence Eigenproblem. Assuming a quadratic bending mode and a linear twist mode with strip theory, the article writes divergence as the vanishing determinant of a structural minus aerodynamic matrix.

\[\left(\mathbf{S} - q\,\mathbf{A}\right)\begin{Bmatrix} h \\ \Theta \end{Bmatrix} = \mathbf{0}, \qquad \det\left(\mathbf{S} - q\,\mathbf{A}\right) = 0 \tag{26}\]

Equation 27, Bespoke Structural and Aerodynamic Matrices of the Two-Mode Model. The matrix entries follow from the assumed quadratic bending and linear twist modes with strip-theory lift acting a distance $e$ ahead of the elastic axis.

\[\mathbf{S} = \begin{bmatrix} 4EI/L^3 & 2K/L^2 \\ 2K/L^2 & GJ/L \end{bmatrix}, \qquad \mathbf{A} = c\,a\begin{bmatrix} -\tfrac{1}{2}\sin\Lambda & \tfrac{L}{4}\cos\Lambda \\ -\tfrac{2e}{3}\sin\Lambda & \tfrac{eL}{3}\cos\Lambda \end{bmatrix} \tag{27}\]

Equation 28, Strain Energy of a Coupled Composite Beam. The strain energy of the beam is half the integral of the bending, torsion and coupling energy densities along the span.

\[U = \tfrac{1}{2}\int_0^L \left[ EI\,(w'')^2 + GJ\,(\theta')^2 + 2K\,w''\theta' \right] dy \tag{28}\]

Equation 29, Bespoke Mode-Shape Integrals. The three integrals are evaluated exactly on the quadratic bending and linear twist shapes the article assumes.

\[\int_0^L (\phi'')^2 dy = \frac{4}{L^3}, \qquad \int_0^L (\psi')^2 dy = \frac{1}{L}, \qquad \int_0^L \phi''\psi'\,dy = \frac{2}{L^2} \tag{29}\]

Equation 30, Bespoke Vanishing Quadratic Coefficient. Within the assumed two-mode model the quadratic coefficient of the characteristic equation cancels identically, so the equation is linear in the dynamic pressure.

\[(ca)^2 e\,L\cos\Lambda\sin\Lambda\left(-\tfrac{1}{6} + \tfrac{1}{6}\right) = 0 \tag{30}\]

Equation 31, Bespoke Closed-Form Untailored Divergence Root. The linear characteristic equation of the assumed two-mode model gives the reciprocal of the divergence dynamic pressure as a torsion term less a bending term whose sign follows the sweep.

\[\frac{1}{q_D} = \underbrace{\frac{c\,a\,e\,L^2\cos\Lambda}{3\,GJ}}_{\text{torsion}} \;-\; \underbrace{\frac{c\,a\,L^3\sin\Lambda}{8\,EI}}_{\text{bending}} \tag{31}\]

Equation 32, Bespoke Critical Sweepback That Removes Divergence. Setting the two terms of the closed-form root equal gives the sweepback at which divergence vanishes, evaluated as about 48 degrees with stiffnesses the article assumes.

\[\tan\Lambda_{\mathrm{crit}} = \frac{8\,e\,EI}{3\,GJ\,L}, \qquad \Lambda_{\mathrm{crit}} = 48.013^\circ \tag{32}\]

Equation 33, Bespoke Absence of a Divergence Root Beyond the Critical Sweep. At sweepback beyond the critical angle the assumed two-mode model has no positive root, recovering the classical result that sufficient sweepback removes divergence.

\[\Lambda \geq \Lambda_{\mathrm{crit}} = 48.0^\circ \implies \text{no positive root, and therefore no divergence boundary at all} \tag{33}\]

Equation 34, Non-Dimensional Bend-Twist Coupling Parameter. The coupling parameter is the coupling stiffness divided by the geometric mean of the bending and torsional stiffnesses. Jones Tsai and Hahn

\[\psi = \frac{K}{\sqrt{EI \cdot GJ}} \tag{34}\]

Equation 35, Positive Definiteness Bound on the Coupling. A positive definite stiffness matrix requires the product of bending and torsional stiffness to exceed the square of the coupling, which bounds the coupling parameter below one in magnitude. Jones Tsai and Hahn

\[EI \cdot GJ - K^2 > 0 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \lvert \psi \rvert < 1 \tag{35}\]

Equation 36, Southwell Twist Response of an Imperfect Structure. A structure with an initial imperfection twists under load in proportion to the ratio of dynamic pressure to its critical value over one minus that ratio. Southwell method

\[\theta(q) = \theta_0 \frac{q/q_D}{1 - q/q_D} \tag{36}\]

Equation 37, Southwell Linear Form. Rearranging the response gives a straight line in twist over dynamic pressure against twist, whose slope is the reciprocal of the divergence dynamic pressure. Southwell method

\[\frac{\theta}{q} = \frac{1}{q_D}\theta + \frac{\theta_0}{q_D} \tag{37}\]

Equation 38, Least-Squares Southwell Slope and Boundary Estimate. The slope of the Southwell line is estimated by ordinary least squares over the measured points, and the estimated boundary is its reciprocal.

\[\hat{m} = \frac{\sum_i (\theta_i - \bar{\theta})(y_i - \bar{y})}{\sum_i (\theta_i - \bar{\theta})^2}, \qquad y_i = \frac{\theta_i}{q_i}, \qquad \hat{q}_D = \frac{1}{\hat{m}} \tag{38}\]

Equation 39, Structural Axis Sweep in Excess of Leading-Edge Sweep. The published structural axis sweep exceeds the published leading-edge sweep by 6.9 degrees. Sims et al. 1989

\[\Lambda_{\mathrm{struct}} - \Lambda_{LE} = 36.2^\circ - 29.3^\circ = 6.9^\circ \tag{39}\]

Equation 40, Bespoke Lower Bound on Root Bending Moment Amplification. The article argues that washin moves the centre of pressure outboard, so the root bending moment grows by at least the published lift amplification of 1.6.

\[\frac{M_{\mathrm{root}}^{\mathrm{elastic}}}{M_{\mathrm{root}}^{\mathrm{rigid}}} \;\geq\; \frac{1}{1 - q/q_D} = 1.6 \quad \text{at the design point} \tag{40}\]

Equation 41, Bespoke Pitch Divergence Rate and Doubling Time Without Damping. The unstable pitch root is taken as the square root of the pitching moment parameter, which neglects pitch damping by the article’s choice and so errs toward less available time.

\[M_\alpha = \frac{q\,S\,\bar{c}\,C_{m_\alpha}}{I_{yy}}, \qquad t_2 = \frac{\ln 2}{\sqrt{M_\alpha}} \tag{41}\]

Equation 42, Subsonic Lift-Curve Slope of a Finite Wing. The standard low-aspect-ratio relation gives the lift-curve slope from aspect ratio, compressibility, section efficiency and mid-chord sweep. Etkin Stevens and Lewis

\[C_{L_\alpha} = \frac{2\pi A}{2 + \sqrt{\dfrac{A^2\beta^2}{\eta^2}\left(1 + \dfrac{\tan^2\Lambda_{c/2}}{\beta^2}\right) + 4}}, \qquad \beta^2 = 1 - M^2 \tag{42}\]

Equation 43, Bespoke Pitching Moment Derivative From the Static Margin. The pitching moment derivative combines the published negative static margin with a lift-curve slope of 5.037 per radian that the article estimates from the planform, since none was published.

\[C_{m_\alpha} = -C_{L_\alpha}\,\mathrm{SM} = -5.037 \times (-0.35) = 1.763 \tag{43}\]

Equation 44, Bespoke Hyperbolic Cosine Response From Rest. A disturbance released from rest grows as a hyperbolic cosine, with a root of 6.861 per second that rests on a pitch inertia the article assumes.

\[\alpha(t) = \alpha_0 \cosh\left(\lambda t\right), \qquad \lambda = \sqrt{M_\alpha} = 6.861\ \mathrm{s^{-1}} \tag{44}\]

Equation 45, Bespoke Exponential and Hyperbolic Cosine Doubling Times. The two doubling times of 0.101 and 0.192 seconds follow from the root computed with the assumed pitch inertia and the estimated lift-curve slope.

\[t_2^{\exp} = \frac{\ln 2}{\lambda} = 0.101\ \mathrm{s}, \qquad t_2^{\cosh} = \frac{\operatorname{arcosh} 2}{\lambda} = 0.192\ \mathrm{s} \tag{45}\]

Equation 46, Ratio of the Two Doubling Times. The ratio of the hyperbolic cosine to the exponential doubling time is the inverse hyperbolic cosine of two over the natural logarithm of two, a fixed factor of 1.900.

\[\frac{t_2^{\cosh}}{t_2^{\exp}} = \frac{\operatorname{arcosh} 2}{\ln 2} = 1.900 \tag{46}\]

Equation 47, Bespoke Effective Loop Delay of the Digital Controller. The effective delay counts half a sample for the zero-order hold and one whole frame for computation, a frame count the article assumes, at the forty hertz sample rate.

\[\tau_{\mathrm{eff}} = \frac{0.5 + n_{\mathrm{compute}}}{f_s} = \frac{1.5}{40\ \mathrm{Hz}} = 37.5\ \mathrm{ms} \tag{47}\]

Equation 48, Nyquist Frequency of the Flight Control Computer. The highest frequency the loop can represent is half the forty hertz sample rate.

\[f_{\mathrm{Nyquist}} = \frac{f_s}{2} = 20\ \mathrm{Hz} \tag{48}\]

Equation 49, Phase Lag of a Pure Time Delay. A pure delay produces a phase lag of 360 degrees times frequency times the delay.

\[\varphi = 360^\circ f \tau_{\mathrm{eff}} \tag{49}\]

Equation 50, Loss Probability of a Triplex Majority Voter. The binomial distribution gives the probability that fewer than two of three independent channels survive when each fails with probability $p$.

\[P_{\mathrm{loss}} = \sum_{k=0}^{1} \binom{3}{k}(1-p)^k p^{3-k} \tag{50}\]

Equation 51, Bespoke Isolation Time as a Fraction of the Doubling Time. The article measures redundancy management by the fraction of the pitch doubling time that the frames needed to isolate a failed channel consume.

\[\frac{\Delta t_{\mathrm{isolate}}}{t_2} = \frac{n_{\mathrm{frames}}/f_s}{t_2} \tag{51}\]

Equation 52, Divergence Dynamic Pressure of an All-Moving Surface. An all-moving surface on a torsional spring diverges when the aerodynamic moment about its axis, set by area, moment arm and lift-curve slope, overcomes the spring.

\[q_{D,\mathrm{surface}} = \frac{K_\theta}{e\,S\,a} \tag{52}\]

Equation 53, Torsional Stiffness Required for a Given Surface Boundary. Inverting the surface divergence relation gives the stiffness required to place the boundary at a chosen dynamic pressure, with the moment arm set by the torsion axis position behind the aerodynamic centre.

\[K_\theta^{\mathrm{req}} = q_D\,e\,S_c\,a, \qquad e = \left(x_{\mathrm{axis}} - x_{ac}\right)\bar{c}_c \tag{53}\]

Equation 54, Static Margin. The static margin is the distance from the centre of gravity to the neutral point in mean aerodynamic chords, which the record gives as negative thirty-five percent. Sims et al. 1989

\[\mathrm{SM} = \frac{x_{np} - x_{cg}}{\bar{c}} = -0.35 \tag{54}\]

Equation 55, Volume Coefficient of a Trimming Surface. The volume coefficient is the surface area ratio times the moment arm in mean aerodynamic chords.

\[V_H = \frac{S_s}{S}\cdot\frac{l}{\bar{c}} \tag{55}\]

Equation 56, Bespoke Trim Balance Against the Section Moment. The article reduces trim to the trimming surface balancing the section pitching moment about the aerodynamic centre alone, a simplification it chooses for the canard and tail comparison.

\[C_{L_{\mathrm{surface}}} V_H = -C_{m_{ac}} \tag{56}\]

Equation 57, Bespoke Wing-Referenced Trim Lift Increment. Referencing the trim lift to the wing area under that simplified balance cancels the surface area, leaving the section moment over the moment arm.

\[\Delta C_L = -\frac{C_{m_{ac}}}{l/\bar{c}} \tag{57}\]

Equation 58, Bespoke Trim Increment at an Assumed Section Moment. The increment is evaluated with a section moment coefficient of $-0.10$ that the article assumes and a canard arm of 1.75 mean aerodynamic chords.

\[\Delta C_L = \frac{0.10}{1.75} = 0.0571 \tag{58}\]

Equation 59, Bespoke Induced Drag Factor at an Assumed Span Efficiency. The standard induced drag relation is evaluated with an aspect ratio of four and a span efficiency of 0.85 that the article assumes.

\[C_{D_i} = \frac{C_L^2}{\pi A e} = k\,C_L^2, \qquad k = \frac{1}{\pi A e} = \frac{1}{\pi \times 4.0 \times 0.85} = 0.0936 \tag{59}\]

Equation 60, Bespoke Induced Drag Ratio of Aft Tail to Canard Trim. At an equal total lift coefficient of 0.8 the article chooses, the wing lift with an aft tail exceeds that with a canard and its induced drag is about a third higher.

\[\frac{C_{D_i}^{\mathrm{tail}}}{C_{D_i}^{\mathrm{canard}}} = \left(\frac{0.857}{0.743}\right)^2 = 1.331 \tag{60}\]

Equation 61, Sweep of a Constant-Chord-Fraction Line. On a straight-tapered wing a line at a fixed chord fraction has a tangent of sweep interpolated linearly between the leading and trailing edges. Hicks and Matheny 1987

\[\tan\Lambda_{f} = \tan\Lambda_{LE} + f\left(\tan\Lambda_{TE} - \tan\Lambda_{LE}\right) \tag{61}\]

Equation 62, Trailing-Edge Sweep of a Straight-Tapered Wing. The trailing-edge sweep of a trapezoidal wing follows from the leading-edge sweep, the aspect ratio and the taper ratio.

\[\tan\Lambda_{TE} = \tan\Lambda_{LE} - \frac{4}{A}\cdot\frac{1 - \lambda}{1 + \lambda} \tag{62}\]

Equation 63, Bespoke Aft-Swept Leading Edge Matching the Mid-Chord Isobar. With a taper ratio of 0.4 that the article assumes, an aft-swept wing needs 44.70 degrees of leading-edge sweep to match the mid-chord isobar sweep of the forward-swept wing.

\[\Lambda_{LE}^{\mathrm{aft}} = 44.70^\circ \quad \text{to match} \quad \Lambda_{50\%} = 37.79^\circ \tag{63}\]

Equation 64, Mach Number Normal to the Mid-Chord Isobar. Simple sweep theory gives the Mach number normal to the isobar as the flight Mach number times the cosine of the isobar sweep.

\[M_n = M\cos\Lambda_{50\%} \tag{64}\]

Equation 65, Bespoke Root Bending Moment at the Design Limit. The root bending moment of one wing is evaluated at the design limit load with the centre of pressure at forty percent of the semispan, a station the article assumes.

\[M_{\mathrm{root}} = \tfrac{1}{2}n\,W\,\eta_{cp}\,\frac{b}{2} = \tfrac{1}{2} \times 8.0 \times 15{,}000 \times 0.4 \times 13.60\ \mathrm{ft} = 3.26 \times 10^{5}\ \mathrm{ft\,lb} \tag{65}\]

Equation 66, Parabolic Polar and Its Maximum Lift-to-Drag Ratio. For a parabolic drag polar the maximum lift-to-drag ratio and the lift coefficient at which it occurs have closed forms in aspect ratio, span efficiency and zero-lift drag.

\[C_D = C_{D_0} + k\,C_L^2, \qquad \left(\frac{L}{D}\right)_{\max} = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi A e}{C_{D_0}}}, \qquad C_L^{\mathrm{opt}} = \sqrt{\frac{C_{D_0}}{k}} \tag{66}\]

Equation 67, Sustained Turn Load Factor. Setting thrust equal to drag in a level turn with a parabolic polar gives the sustained load factor from dynamic pressure, wing loading and thrust-to-weight ratio.

\[\frac{T}{W} = \frac{q\,C_{D_0}}{W/S} + \frac{k\,(W/S)\,n^2}{q} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad n = \sqrt{\frac{q}{k\,(W/S)}\left(\frac{T}{W} - \frac{q\,C_{D_0}}{W/S}\right)} \tag{67}\]

Equation 68, Usable Bandwidth of the Instrumentation Sample Rates. The Nyquist criterion applied to the published range of 25 to 400 samples per second gives a usable band from 12.5 to 200 hertz. Hicks and Matheny 1987

\[f_{\max} \leq \frac{f_s}{2} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad 12.5\ \mathrm{Hz} \leq f_{\max} \leq 200\ \mathrm{Hz} \tag{68}\]

Equation 69, Bespoke Boundary Uncertainty From Rounding of the Ratio. The elasticity of the boundary is applied to a rounding uncertainty of plus or minus 0.05 in the ratio of 1.6, an interval the article assumes from the two significant figures quoted.

\[\frac{\Delta q_D}{q_D} \approx -\frac{1}{r-1}\cdot\frac{\Delta r}{r} = -1.667 \times \left(\pm\frac{0.05}{1.6}\right) = \mp 5.2\ \mathrm{percent} \tag{69}\]

Notation

  • $W$, the weight, with $W_{\mathrm{fuel}}$ the fuel weight
  • $S$, the wing reference area, with $S_c$ the canard area
  • $T$, the thrust, except in the constitutive law, where it is the torque
  • $q$, the dynamic pressure
  • $q_D$, the divergence dynamic pressure
  • $K_\theta$, the torsional stiffness of the wing section or of the surface spring
  • $\theta$, the elastic twist, with $\theta_0$ the initial imperfection in the Southwell relations
  • $\alpha_0$, the rigid angle of attack
  • $r$, the ratio of elastic to rigid lift-curve slope
  • $V_e$, the equivalent airspeed
  • $\rho_0$, the sea-level air density
  • $\Lambda$, the sweep angle of the elastic axis, positive aft
  • $EI$, the bending stiffness
  • $GJ$, the torsional stiffness of the beam
  • $\psi$, the non-dimensional bend-twist coupling parameter
  • $L$, the semispan of the two-mode model
  • $C_{L_\alpha}$, the lift-curve slope per radian
  • $C_{m_\alpha}$, the pitching moment derivative
  • $\mathrm{SM}$, the static margin as a fraction of the mean aerodynamic chord
  • $\bar{c}$, the mean aerodynamic chord, with $\bar{c}_c$ that of the canard
  • $I_{yy}$, the moment of inertia in pitch
  • $M_\alpha$, the pitching moment parameter in angular acceleration per radian
  • $t_2$, the time to double a disturbance
  • $f_s$, the sample rate
  • $\tau_{\mathrm{eff}}$, the effective delay of the digital control loop
  • $p$, the failure probability of a single channel
  • $V_H$, the volume coefficient of the trimming surface
  • $C_{m_{ac}}$, the section pitching moment coefficient about the aerodynamic centre
  • $k$, the induced drag factor
  • $\Lambda_{LE}$, the leading-edge sweep, with $\Lambda_{TE}$ the trailing-edge sweep and $\Lambda_{50\%}$ the mid-chord isobar sweep
  • $M_n$, the Mach number normal to the isobar
  • $n$, the load factor
  • $C_{D_0}$, the zero-lift drag coefficient

References

Primary Sources, Peer-Reviewed

  • “044 Finite Worldlength Control of Sampled Data Systems by Covariance Assignment.” 1994. Control Engineering Practice 2 (4): 710. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(94)90059-0
  • “057 H∞ Control Design for a Class of Uncertain Sampled-Data Systems.” 1994. Control Engineering Practice 2 (4): 711. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(94)90072-8
  • “130 Sampled-Data Decentralized Controller Design.” 1994. Control Engineering Practice 2 (3): 533. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(94)90919-9
  • “185 a Fourier Series Lifting Approach to H∞ Sampled Data Control.” 1994. Control Engineering Practice 2 (3): 538. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(94)90974-1
  • “214 Application of Restructurable Flight Control System to an Airliner.” 1994. Control Engineering Practice 2 (3): 541. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(94)91003-0
  • Aamir, Mamoon, Aqsa Zafar Abbasi, Mohamed Bechir Ben Hamida, and Husnain Raza Qasim. 2026. “Aerodynamic Performance of Camber-Morphing Airfoils in Transonic and Supersonic Flow.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038958
  • Abbas, Tajammal, and Guido Morgenthal. 2016. “Framework for Sensitivity and Uncertainty Quantification in the Flutter Assessment of Bridges.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 43: 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.12.007
  • Abdul-Kaiyoom, Mohamed Arshath Saja, Anil Yildirim, Alasdair C. Gray, and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2025. “Airfoil Separation Constraint Formulation for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (1): 48–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037365
  • Abdullah, Nur Azam, Mahesa Akbar, Nanda Wirawan, and Jose Luis Curiel-Sosa. 2019. “Structural Integrity Assessment on Cracked Composites Interaction with Aeroelastic Constraint by Means of XFEM.” Composite Structures 229: 111414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111414
  • Abichandani, K. P., and R. M. Rosenberg. 1952. “Once More: Single Degree of Freedom Flutter of an Aileron.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 19 (7): 503–4. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2362
  • Abou-Kebeh, Sami, Roberto Gil-Pita, and Manuel Rosa-Zurera. 2025. “Application of Deep Learning to Identify Flutter Flight Testing Signals Parameters and Analysis of Real F-18 Flutter Flight Test Data.” Aerospace 12 (1): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12010034
  • AbuNawas, Mousa M., and Bashar R. Qawasmeh. 2026. “Coupling Dynamic Stall with Lifting-Line Theory for Gust and Maneuver Analysis.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038542
  • Ackerman, Kasey A., Enric Xargay, Ronald Choe, et al. 2017. “Evaluation of an L1 Adaptive Flight Control Law on Calspan’s Variable-Stability Learjet.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (4): 1051–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001730
  • Ackermann, Marc, and Christian Haase. 2023. “Machine Learning-Based Identification of Interpretable Process-Structure Linkages in Metal Additive Manufacturing.” Additive Manufacturing 71: 103585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103585
  • “Acoustic Emission Monitors Damage Progression in Graphite/epoxy Composite Structure.” 1981. Composites 12 (2): 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(81)90431-6
  • “Acoustic Emissions and Transient Elastic Waves in an Orthotropic Laminate Plate.” 1989. Composites 20 (5): 496. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(89)90260-7
  • Acquatella B., Paul, Wim van Ekeren, and Qi Ping Chu. 2017. “PI(D) Tuning for Flight Control Systems via Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 50 (1): 8175–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1265
  • Adams, James J., and Howard B. Hatch. 1971. “An Approac e Determination of Aircraft Handling Qualities Using Pilot Transfer Functions.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (5): 319–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59103
  • Adan, M., and I. Sheinman. 1988. “Effect of Stretching-Bending Coupling and Shear Deformations on Post-Buckling Behaviour of Laminated Beams.” Computers & Structures 30 (3): 609–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90296-9
  • Adler, Eytan J., and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2023. “Efficient Aerostructural Wing Optimization Considering Mission Analysis.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (3): 800–816. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037096
  • Aghababa, Mohammad Pourmahmood. 2018. “Adaptive Switching Control of Uncertain Fractional Systems: Application to Chua’s Circuit.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 32 (8): 1206–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2897
  • Agrawal, Gourav, Abhinav Gupta, Rajib Chowdhury, and Anupam Chakrabarti. 2022. “Robust Topology Optimization of Negative Poisson’s Ratio Metamaterials under Material Uncertainty.” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 198: 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2021.103649
  • Agrell, Nada, and Lorentz Elmeland. 1985. “Transonic Aerodynamic Computations for a Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (8): 675–78. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45185
  • Aguilar-Ibañez, Carlos. 2016. “Stabilization of the PVTOL Aircraft Based on a Sliding Mode and a Saturation Function.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 27 (5): 843–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3601
  • Ahmadi, Majid, and Touraj Farsadi. 2024. “Multidisciplinary Optimization of High Aspect Ratio Composite Wings with Geometrical Nonlinearity and Aeroelastic Tailoring.” Aerospace Science and Technology 145: 108849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108849
  • Ahmadi, Majid, Touraj Farsadi, and Hamed Haddad Khodaparast. 2024. “Enhancing Gust Load Alleviation Performance in an Optimized Composite Wing Using Passive Wingtip Devices: Folding and Twist Approaches.” Aerospace Science and Technology 147: 109023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109023
  • Ahmadian, Hossein, Heidar Ali Talebi, and Iman Sharifi. 2025. “ℒasso ℳ𝒫𝒞-Based ℒ1 Adaptive Control for Uncertain Euler–Lagrange Systems: Guaranteed Stability Robustness and Performance.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 39 (5): 842–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3957
  • Ajel, Ahmed R., Amjad J. Humaidi, Ibraheem Kasim Ibraheem, and Ahmad Taher Azar. 2021. “Robust Model Reference Adaptive Control for Tail-Sitter VTOL Aircraft.” Actuators 10 (7): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/act10070162
  • Akbari, S., S. Galeani, G. Manca, and M. Sassano. 2025. “Dynamic Control Allocation for Nonlinear Systems via a Sensitivity Approach.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 9: 2549–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2025.3633369
  • Al-Hussein, Abdullah, and Achintya Haldar. 2015. “Unscented Kalman Filter with Unknown Input and Weighted Global Iteration for Health Assessment of Large Structural Systems: Unscented Kalman Filter-Unknown Input-Weighted Global Iteration.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring 23 (1): 156–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1764
  • Al-Jaburi, Khider, Daniel Feszty, and Fred Nitzsche. 2019. “A Methodology for Simulating 2D Shock-Induced Dynamic Stall at Flight Test-Based Fluctuating Freestream.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 32 (10): 2223–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.05.009
  • Alag, Gurbux S., and Howard Kaufman. 1975. “Digital Adaptive Model Following Flight Control.” Journal of Aircraft 12 (9): 693–94. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59859
  • Alam, Mushfiqul, Martin Hromcik, and Tomas Hanis. 2015. “Active Gust Load Alleviation System for Flexible Aircraft: Mixed Feedforward/feedback Approach.” Aerospace Science and Technology 41: 122–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.12.020
  • Alcaina, J., A. Cuenca, J. Salt, V. Casanova, and R. Pizá. 2019. “Delay-Independent Dual-Rate PID Controller for a Packet-Based Networked Control System.” Information Sciences 484: 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.059
  • Ale Isaac, Mohammad Sadeq, Ahmed Refaat Ragab, Marco Andrés Luna, Mohammad Mehdi Ale Eshagh Khoeini, and Pascual Campoy. 2023. “Thrust Vectoring Control for Heavy UAVs, Employing a Redundant Communication System.” Sensors 23 (12): 5561. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23125561
  • Alhajahmad, Ahmad, and Christian Mittelstedt. 2021. “Buckling Performance of Curvilinearly Grid-Stiffened Tow-Placed Composite Panels Considering Manufacturing Constraints.” Composite Structures 260: 113271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113271
  • Almosnino, D. 1985. “High Angle-of-Attack Calculations of the Subsonic Vortex Flow on Slender Bodies.” AIAA Journal 23 (8): 1150–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9057
  • Alsaidi, Bashir, Woong Yeol Joe, and Muhammad Akbar. 2019a. “Computational Analysis of 3D Lattice Structures for Skin in Real-Scale Camber Morphing Aircraft.” Aerospace 6 (7): 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6070079
  • Alsaidi, Bashir, Woong Yeol Joe, and Muhammad Akbar. 2019b. “Simplified 2D Skin Lattice Models for Multi-Axial Camber Morphing Wing Aircraft.” Aerospace 6 (8): 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6080090
  • Altunkaya, Ege Ç., and İbrahim Özkol. 2025. “Supermaneuver Control Using a Self-Tuning Strategy without Thrust Vectoring.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 48 (8): 1941–52. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008752
  • Alyanak, Edward J., and Ed Pendleton. 2017. “Aeroelastic Tailoring and Active Aeroelastic Wing Impact on a Lambda Wing Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033040
  • An, Hao, Ziyi Guo, Guan Wang, and Changhong Wang. 2020. “Low-Complexity Hypersonic Flight Control with Asymmetric Angle of Attack Constraint.” Nonlinear Dynamics 100 (1): 435–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05531-8
  • An, Xiaomin, Boo Cheng Khoo, and Yongdong Cui. 2017. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of Curved Laminated Composite Panels.” Composite Structures 179: 377–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.042
  • An, Chao, Duoyao Zhang, Rui Zhao, Changchuan Xie, and Chao Yang. 2026. “Structural Reduced-Order Model Including Geometrical Nonlinearities and Application to Aeroelastic Behavior Analysis.” Aerospace Science and Technology 168: 111209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.111209
  • “An Anal Ysis of the Test Loading of a Flexible Pipe Arch, Using the Southwell Plot, Shows That the Method Has Promise as a General Inspection Technique for Buried Structures Such as Large Diameter Corrugated Plate Arches on Motorw y Construction Projects.” 1974. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 11 (6): 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(74)90690-1
  • Anderson, Seth B. 1985. “Handling Qualities Related to Stall/spin Accidents of Supersonic Fighter Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (10): 875–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45218
  • Anderson, D. C., R. L. Berger, and J. R. Hess. 1973. “Maneuver Load Control and Relaxed Static Stability Applied to aContemporary Fighter Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 10 (2): 112–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60204
  • Ando, Shigenori, and Haruki Yashiro. 1976. “Minimum Induced Drag of Ground Effect Wings.” Journal of Hydronautics 10 (3): 106–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48148
  • Andrés-Pérez, Esther, Daniel González-Juárez, Mario J. Martin-Burgos, Leopoldo Carro-Calvo, and Sancho Salcedo-Sanz. 2016. “Influence of the Number and Location of Design Parameters in the Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Transonic Aerofoil and a Wing through Evolutionary Algorithms and Support Vector Machines.” Engineering Optimization 49 (2): 181–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2016.1165568
  • Ang, Elijah Hao Wei, Daryl Jieli Leo, Jun Kang Tan, Jonathan Chien Ming Tay, Yongdong Cui, and Bing Feng Ng. 2024. “Wind Tunnel Experiments of Bending-Torsion and Body-Freedom Flutter on Flying Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.” Aerospace Science and Technology 144: 108798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108798
  • Ang, Elijah H. W., and Bing Feng Ng. 2026. “Stability Analysis of Body-Freedom Flutter in Flying Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.” AIAA Journal 64 (2): 946–54. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j065873
  • Ansari, Quaiyum M., Giovanni Zucco, Luan C. Trinh, and Paul M. Weaver. 2023. “Compression Buckling of Elastically Supported Cylindrical Shells with Bend/Twist Coupling.” Composite Structures 309: 116691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116691
  • Antonakis, Aristeidis. 2025a. “Handling Qualities Sizing for Aerial Vehicles Based on Control Moment Polytopes.” Aerospace Science and Technology 159: 110020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110020
  • Antonakis, Aristeidis. 2025b. “Reinforcement-Learning-Based Aircraft Handling Qualities Testing with Uncertainty Modeling.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 16 (2): 467–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00815-4
  • Antonakis, Aristeidis, and Jean-Marc Biannic. 2024. “Minimum-Drag Fault-Tolerant Aircraft Control Allocation via Online Lifting Line Calculation.” Journal of Aircraft 61 (5): 1428–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037707
  • Arena, Andrea, and Walter Lacarbonara. 2012. “Nonlinear Parametric Modeling of Suspension Bridges under Aeroelastic Forces: Torsional Divergence and Flutter.” Nonlinear Dynamics 70 (4): 2487–2510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-012-0636-3
  • Argha, Ahmadreza, Steven W. Su, and Branko G. Celler. 2018. “Static Output Feedback Fault Tolerant Control Using Control Allocation Scheme.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 29 (1): 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4376
  • Argha, Ahmadreza, Steven W. Su, Wei Xing Zheng, and Branko G. Celler. 2019. “Sliding-Mode Fault-Tolerant Control Using the Control Allocation Scheme.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 29 (17): 6256–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4727
  • Ariyarit, Atthaphon, and Masahiro Kanazaki. 2017. “Multi-Fidelity Multi-Objective Efficient Global Optimization Applied to Airfoil Design Problems.” Applied Sciences 7 (12): 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7121318
  • Armanious, George, and Rick Lind. 2017. “Fly-by-Feel Control of an Aeroelastic Aircraft Using Distributed Multirate Kalman Filtering.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (9): 2323–29. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g002799
  • Arnault, A., J. Dandois, and J.-M. Foucaut. 2016. “Comparison of Stochastic Estimation Methods with Conditional Events Optimization for the Reconstruction of the Flow around a Supercritical Airfoil in Transonic Conditions.” Computers & Fluids 136: 436–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.06.006
  • Arnold, Lee. 1942. “Vector Solution of the Three-Degree Case of Wing Bending, Wing Torsion, Aileron Flutter.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 9 (13): 497–500. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.10949
  • Asadi Khanouki, Mostafa, Mohammad Hossein Javadi Aghdam, and Farjad Shadmehri. 2019. “Comment on “Aeroelastic Design Optimization of Thin-Walled Subsonic Wings against Divergence” [Thin-Walled Struct., 47 (2008) 89–97].” Thin-Walled Structures 137: 433–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.01.001
  • Asgari, Mojtaba, and Mohammad Ali Kouchakzadeh. 2016. “Aeroelastic Characteristics of Magneto-Rheological Fluid Sandwich Beams in Supersonic Airflow.” Composite Structures 143: 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.015
  • Ashkenas, Irving L. 1984. “Twenty-Five Years of Handling Qualities Research.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (5): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44963
  • Aslam, Muhammad Shamrooz, and Ziran Chen. 2018. “Event-Triggered Reliable Dissipative Filtering for the Delay Nonlinear System under Networked Systems with the Sensor Fault.” International Journal of Control 93 (3): 640–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2018.1484172
  • Aston, G., and F. W. Williams. 1994. “Simplified Methods for the Buckling Analysis of Composite Multi-Spar Wing Boxes.” Composite Structures 28 (2): 215–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(94)90050-7
  • Atmaca, Direnc, Coen de Visser, and Erik-Jan van Kampen. 2025. “Online Inertial Measurement Unit Fault Identification and Active Fault-Tolerant Flight Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 48 (10): 2389–98. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g009147
  • Autenrieb, Johannes. 2025. “Quadratic Programming Approach to Flight Envelope Protection Using Control Barrier Functions.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 48 (11): 2622–33. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g009203
  • Axelson, John A. 1977. “Estimation of Transonic Aircraft Aerodynamics to High Angles of Attack.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (6): 553–59. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58819
  • Axten, Rachel M., Thanakorn Khamvilai, and Eric N. Johnson. 2024. “Multi-Outer Loop Dynamic Inversion Control: An Application to a VTOL Free-Wing Aircraft.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 8: 181–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2023.3346458
  • Ayaz, Ahsan, Iqbal Rasool Memon, Fahad Ali, et al. 2024. “Aeroelastic Tailoring Framework of Pazy Wing with Variable Stiffness of Composites Spar.” IEEE Access 12: 106042–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3435961
  • Ayorinde, E. O., and R. F. Gibson. 1993. “Elastic Constants of Orthotropic Composite Materials Using Plate Resonance Frequencies, Classical Lamination Theory and an Optimized Three-Mode Rayleigh Formulation.” Composites Engineering 3 (5): 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9526(93)90077-w
  • Azadegan, Masoumeh, and Mohammad T. H. Beheshti. 2017. “Robust Stability and Stabilization of TCP-Networked Control Systems with Multiple Delay System Modeling.” Asian Journal of Control 19 (3): 1034–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1435
  • Babuska, Pavel, Richard Wiebe, and Michael R. Motley. 2018. “A Beam Finite Element for Analysis of Composite Beams with the Inclusion of Bend-Twist Coupling.” Composite Structures 189: 707–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.036
  • Bach, Christopher, Reda Jebari, Andrea Viti, and Rob Hewson. 2016. “Composite Stacking Sequence Optimization for Aeroelastically Tailored Forward-Swept Wings.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 55 (1): 105–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1477-3
  • Badalló, P., D. Trias, and E. Lindgaard. 2015. “Damage Tolerance Optimization of Composite Stringer Run-out under Tensile Load.” Composite Structures 133: 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.025
  • Badhurshah, Rameez, Antonio J. Álvarez, Félix Nieto, José Á. Jurado, and Santiago Hernández. 2024. “Assessment of the Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Performance of Long-Span Twin-Box Bridges Based upon Multidimensional Surrogate Models.” Applied Sciences 14 (13): 5531. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135531
  • Badihi, Mahdi Ebrahimnejad, Ali Khosravani Nezhad, Amirreza Kosari, and Arash Kosari. 2026. “Two-Stage Design of Experiment Optimization Framework for Morphing Wing of Acrobatic Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (5): 2363–78. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038688
  • Bagherzadeh, Seyed Amin. 2026. “Using the LSTM Network for Gray-Box Dynamic Identification of Aircraft at Post-Stall Maneuvers.” Mathematical and Computational Applications 31 (3): 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca31030085
  • Bagherzadeh, Seyed Amin, Hamed Mohammadkarimi, and Mohammad Hossein Alizadeh. 2025. “Enhanced Synchrosqueezing Transform for Detecting Non-Traditional Flight Modes in High Angle of Attack Maneuvers.” Mathematical and Computational Applications 30 (2): 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca30020041
  • Bahamonde Jacome, Luis, and Ali Elham. 2017. “Wing Aerostructural Optimization under Uncertain Aircraft Range and Payload Weight.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (3): 1109–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034050
  • Baker, A. A., R. Jones, and R. J. Callinan. 1985. “Damage Tolerance of Graphite/epoxy Composites.” Composite Structures 4 (1): 15–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(85)90018-2
  • Balaji, Lingesh, Ganapathi Manickam, Olivier Polit, Mohamed Haboussi, and Sachin Dineshkumar. 2024. “Variable Angle Tow-Steered Curvilinear Fibres-Based Rotating Arbitrarily Layered Composite Beams- a Coupled Vibration of Chordwise-Flapwise-Torsional Motions by Higher-Order Beam Theory.” Composite Structures 340: 118199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118199
  • Balakrishnan, A. V., and A. Tuffaha. 2012. “The Transonic Dip in Aeroelastic Divergence Speed—an Explicit Formula.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 349 (1): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.10.004
  • Balatti, Davide, Hamed Haddad Khodaparast, Michael I. Friswell, Marinos Manolesos, and Andrea Castrichini. 2021. “Aircraft Turbulence and Gust Identification Using Simulated in-Flight Data.” Aerospace Science and Technology 115: 106805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106805
  • Baldan, Giacomo, and Alberto Guardone. 2024. “A Deep Neural Network Reduced Order Model for Unsteady Aerodynamics of Pitching Airfoils.” Aerospace Science and Technology 152: 109345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109345
  • Ballester Claret, Roger, Ludovic Coelho, Christian Fagiano, Cédric Julien, Didier Lucor, and Nicolò Fabbiane. 2024. “Reliability Based Optimisation of Composite Plates under Aeroelastic Constraints via Adapted Surrogate Modelling and Genetic Algorithms.” Composite Structures 347: 118461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118461
  • Bandyopadhyay, G. 1991. “Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of Close-Coupled Canard Configuration at Incidence and Sideslip.” Journal of Aircraft 28 (10): 646–51. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46077
  • Banerjee, Sanchito. 2019. “Flight Parameter Analysis of an L1 Adaptive Controller of a Hypersonic Glider.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (3): 1149–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034888
  • Bantscheff, Konstantin, and Christian Breitsamter. 2023. “Dynamic Structural Scaling Concept for a Delta Wing Wind Tunnel Configuration Using Additive Manufacturing.” Aerospace 10 (7): 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10070581
  • Bao, Xin, Yan Li, and Zhong Wang. 2025. “Direct Force Control Technology for Longitudinal Trajectory of Receiver Aircraft Based on Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion and Active Disturbance Rejection Controller.” Machines 13 (6): 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13060525
  • Bar-Gill, Aharon, and Robert F. Stengel. 1986. “Longitudinal Flying Qualitites Criteria for Single-Pilot Instrument Flight Operations.” Journal of Aircraft 23 (2): 111–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45276
  • Barabanov, Nikita, and Romeo Ortega. 2017. “On the Need of Projections in Input-Error Model Reference Adaptive Control.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 32 (3): 403–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2851
  • Barbosa, Guilherme C., Rafael M. Bertolin, Juliano A. Paulino, Antônio B. Guimarães Neto, and Flavio J. Silvestre. 2022. “Design and Flight Test of a Stability Augmentation System for a Flexible Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (9): 1709–23. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006271
  • Bartels, Robert E., and Bret K. Stanford. 2018. “Aeroelastic Optimization with an Economical Transonic Flutter Constraint Using Navier–Stokes Aerodynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (4): 1522–30. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034675
  • Bartoszewicz, Andrzej, and Katarzyna Adamiak. 2018. “Model Reference Discrete-Time Variable Structure Control.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 32 (10): 1440–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2922
  • Bashir, Musavir, Simon Longtin-Martel, Ruxandra Mihaela Botez, and Tony Wong. 2021. “Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Morphing Leading Edge and Trailing Edge Airfoil–Application on the UAS-S45.” Applied Sciences 11 (4): 1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041664
  • Bashir, Musavir, Mir Hossein Negahban, Ruxandra Mihaela Botez, and Tony Wong. 2024. “Numerical Simulation of the Transient Flow around the Combined Morphing Leading-Edge and Trailing-Edge Airfoil.” Biomimetics 9 (2): 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9020109
  • Bastin, Georges, Jean-Michel Coron, and Amaury Hayat. 2025. “The Usefulness of Viscosity for the Robustness of Boundary Feedback Control of an Unstable Fluid Flow System.” Automatica 173: 112048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2024.112048
  • Basu Roy, Sayan, and Shubhendu Bhasin. 2019. “Novel Model Reference Adaptive Control Architecture Using Semi-Initial Excitation-Based Switched Parameter Estimator.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 33 (12): 1759–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3046
  • Batina, J. T., and T. Y. Yang. 1985. “Transonic Time Responses of the MBB a-3 Supercritical Airfoil Including Active Controls.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (5): 393–400. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45137
  • Battaglia, Miriam, and Aniello Riccio. 2026. “An Additively Manufactured Self-Recovering Morphing Airfoil with Shape Memory Alloy Actuation.” Actuators 15 (8): 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/act15080414
  • Becker, Wilfried. 1992. “Closed-Form Analytical Solutions for a Griffith Crack in a Non-Symmetric Laminate Plate.” Composite Structures 21 (1): 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(92)90079-r
  • Bellini, C., and L. Sorrentino. 2018. “Mould Design for Manufacturing of Isogrid Structures in Composite Material.” Procedia Structural Integrity 9: 172–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.06.027
  • Benaddy, Abdellah, Moussa Labbadi, and Mostafa Bouzi. 2022. “Robust Flight Control for a Quadrotor under External Disturbances Based on Generic Second Order Sliding Mode Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 55 (12): 270–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.323
  • Bendahmane, Amine, Sidi Mohammed Hamza-Cherif, and Mohammed Nabil Ouissi. 2019. “Free Vibration Analysis of Variable Stiffness Composite Laminate (VSCL) Plates Coupled with Fluid.” Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures 28 (2): 167–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.1553257
  • “Bending of Cross-Ply Laminated Plates Using Lagrange Multipliers.” 1991. Composites 22 (1): 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(91)90115-w
  • Bennett, Robert M., Bryan E. Dansberry, Moses G. Farmer, Clinton V. Eckstrom, David A. Seidel, and Jose A. River. 1993. “Transonic Shock-Induced Dynamics of a Flexible Wing with a Thick Airfoil.” Journal of Aircraft 30 (1): 112–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46314
  • Berezhnitskii, L. T., and I. T. Denisyuk. 1985. “Problem of Thermoelasticity for an Anisotropic Plate with a Sharp Ended Anisotropic Inclusion.” Soviet Materials Science 21 (2): 167–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01150635
  • Berg, John K., Kuang-Ying Ting, Eli Livne, and Kristi Morgansen. 2025. “Destabilize/Stabilize Approach to Experimental Active Flutter Suppression Technology Development.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 48 (5): 968–81. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008589
  • Bergen, W. B., and Lee Arnold. 1940. “Graphical Solution of the Bending-Aileron Case of Flutter.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 7 (12): 495–508. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.1231
  • Berger, Tom, Mark B. Tischler, Steven G. Hagerott, et al. 2021. “Business Jet Fly-by-Wire Control Laws Handling Qualities Flight Test Assessment.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 44 (8): 1498–1516. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g005768
  • Berman, Howard, and Richard Gran. 1974. “Design Principles for Digital Autopilot Synthesis.” Journal of Aircraft 11 (7): 414–22. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60358
  • Bernstein, Dennis S., and C. V. Hollot. 1989. “Robust Stability for Sampled-Data Control Systems.” Systems & Control Letters 13 (3): 217–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(89)90067-4
  • Berry, Donald T., Bruce G. Powers, Kenneth J. Szalai, and R. J. Wilson. 1982. “In-Flight Evaluation of Control System Pure Time Delays.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (4): 318–23. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57395
  • Bessa, Iury, Vicenç Puig, and Reinaldo Martinez Palhares. 2020. “TS Fuzzy Reconfiguration Blocks for Fault Tolerant Control of Nonlinear Systems.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 357 (8): 4592–4623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.02.002
  • Bessadi, K., D. Saussié, and L. Saydy. 2016. “Robustness Assessment of a Load Factor Flight Control Law Using Dilation Integrals**This Work Was Supported by NSERC under Grant RGPIN-2014-03942 and RGPIN-2012-122106.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (17): 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.017
  • Beyer, Yannic, Meiko Steen, and Peter Hecker. 2024a. “Boosted Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Flexible Airplane Gust Load Alleviation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (7): 1394–1413. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007984
  • Beyer, Yannic, Junaid Ullah, Meiko Steen, and Peter Hecker. 2024b. “Unsteady Nonlinear Lifting Line Model for Active Gust Load Alleviation of Airplanes.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 15 (4): 917–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-024-00760-8
  • Beyers, Martin E. 1988. “Influence of Support Oscillation in Dynamic Stability Tests.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (2): 178–83. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45559
  • Bhachu, K. S., R. T. Haftka, G. Waycaster, N. H. Kim, and C. Hurst. 2015. “Probabilistic Manufacturing Tolerance Optimization of Damage-Tolerant Aircraft Structures Using Measured Data.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (5): 1412–21. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c032945
  • Bhardwaj, Manoj, and Rakesh K. Kapania. 1995. “Shape Sensitivity Analysis of Divergence Dynamic Pressure.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (4): 898–901. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46814
  • Bhatia, Ajeet Kumar, Ju Jiang, Aakash Kumar, Syed Awais Ali Shah, Avinash Rohra, and Zhen ZiYang. 2021. “Adaptive Preview Control with Deck Motion Compensation for Autonomous Carrier Landing of an Aircraft.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 35 (5): 769–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3228
  • Bhattacharyya, Anurag, Cian Conlan-Smith, and Kai A. James. 2019. “Design of a Bi-Stable Airfoil with Tailored Snap-through Response Using Topology Optimization.” Computer-Aided Design 108: 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2018.11.001
  • Bi, Ying, Changchuan Xie, Chao An, and Chao Yang. 2017. “Gust Load Alleviation Wind Tunnel Tests of a Large-Aspect-Ratio Flexible Wing with Piezoelectric Control.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 30 (1): 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.12.028
  • Bi-quan, Ye, and Chou Huan-wen. 1990. “Numerical-Perturbation Analysis of Edge Effect in Bending Laminated Plate.” Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 11 (3): 201–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02015201
  • Bian, Qi, Brett Nener, and Xinmin Wang. 2018. “An Improved NSGA-II Based Control Allocation Optimisation for Aircraft Longitudinal Automatic Landing System.” International Journal of Control 92 (4): 705–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2018.1473643
  • Bian, Qi, Brett Nener, and Xinmin Wang. 2019. “A Modified NSGA-II for Solving Control Allocation Optimization Problem in Lateral Flight Control System for Large Aircraft.” IEEE Access 7: 17696–17704. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2894961
  • Binder, Simon, Andreas Wildschek, and Roeland De Breuker. 2021. “The Interaction between Active Aeroelastic Control and Structural Tailoring in Aeroservoelastic Wing Design.” Aerospace Science and Technology 110: 106516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106516
  • Bischoff, David E. 1983. “The Definition of Short-Period Flying Qualities Characteristics via Equivalent Systems.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (6): 494–99. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44899
  • Bismarck-Nasr, Maher N. 1994. “Direct Solution of the Aeroelastic Stability Equations.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (4): 979–81. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46590
  • Biswas, Kanchan. 1993. “Laminate Characterisation in the Presence of Thermal Stresses.” Composite Structures 23 (4): 339–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(93)90233-g
  • Blackwell, James A., and Gerald A. Pounds. 1977. “Wind-Tunnel Wall Interference Effects on a Supercritical Airfoil at Transonic Speeds.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (10): 929–35. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58877
  • Blair, Maxwell, and Terrence A. Weisshaar. 1982. “Swept Composite Wing Aeroelastic Divergence Experiments.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (11): 1019–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44806
  • Bland, Samuel R. 1980. “Illustration of Airfoil Shape Effect on Forward-Swept Wing Divergence.” Journal of Aircraft 17 (10): 761–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44684
  • Blight, J. D., D. Gangsaas, and T. M. Richardson. 1986. “Control Law Synthesis for an Airplane with Relaxed Static Stability.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 9 (5): 546–54. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20145
  • Boado-Cuartero, Blanca, Javier Pérez-Álvarez, and Elena Roibás-Millán. 2024. “Material Characterization of High-Performance Polymers for Additive Manufacturing (AM) in Aerospace Mechanical Design.” Aerospace 11 (9): 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11090748
  • Bogan, Yu. A. 1981. “Second Boundary-Value Problem of the Theory of Elasticity for a Significantly Anisotropic Plate with an Elliptical Hole.” Soviet Applied Mechanics 17 (9): 821–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00884128
  • Bohlmann, Jonathan D., Clinton V. Eckstrom, and Terrence A. Weisshaar. 1990. “Static Aeroelastic Tailoring for Oblique Wing Lateral Trim.” Journal of Aircraft 27 (6): 558–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25319
  • Bohlmann, Jonathan D., Terrence A. Weisshaar, and Clinton V. Eckstrom. 1988. “Aeroelastic Tailoring for Oblique Wing Lateral Trim.” In Structures. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880044993
  • Bolotin, V. V., A. A. Grishko, and A. V. Petrovsky. 1996. “Secondary Bifurcations and Global Instability of an Aeroelastic Non-Linear System in the Divergence Domain.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 191 (3): 431–51. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0132
  • Bombardieri, Rocco, Rauno Cavallaro, Ruben Sanchez, and Nicolas R. Gauger. 2021. “Aerostructural Wing Shape Optimization Assisted by Algorithmic Differentiation.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 64 (2): 739–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02884-5
  • Bons, Nicolas P., and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2020. “Aerostructural Design Exploration of a Wing in Transonic Flow.” Aerospace 7 (8): 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7080118
  • Bordogna, Marco Tito, Paul Lancelot, Dimitri Bettebghor, and Roeland De Breuker. 2020. “Static and Dynamic Aeroelastic Tailoring with Composite Blending and Manoeuvre Load Alleviation.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 61 (5): 2193–2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02446-w
  • Bouadi, Hakim, and F. Mora-Camino. 2018. “Modeling and Adaptive Flight Control for Quadrotor Trajectory Tracking.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (2): 666–81. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034477
  • Boudreau, J. A. 1977. “Impact of CCV Requirements on Flight Control System Design.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (11): 1051–59. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58889
  • Bouton, Innes. 1950. “Lift-Curve Slope for Swept and Unswept Wings.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 17 (3): 185–185. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.1573
  • Bowers, Douglas L. 1981. “Propulsive Aerodynamics of an Advanced Nozzle/Forward Swept Wing Aircraft Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 18 (7): 582–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57530
  • Bradley, Natasha C. E., Kevin P. T. Haughn, Todd C. Henry, and John T. Hrynuk. 2026. “Effectiveness of Wing Morphing Techniques for Maneuverability: A Direct Comparison Method.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038700
  • Bras, M., S. Warwick, and A. Suleman. 2022. “Aeroelastic Evaluation of a Flexible High Aspect Ratio Wing UAV: Numerical Simulation and Experimental Flight Validation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 122: 107400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107400
  • Breitsamter, Christian, and Boris Laschka. 2001. “Vortical Flowfield Structure at Forward Swept-Wing Configurations.” Journal of Aircraft 38 (2): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2758
  • Brodecki, Marcin, and Kamesh Subbarao. 2015. “Autonomous Formation Flight Control System Using in-Flight Sweet-Spot Estimation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 38 (6): 1083–96. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000220
  • Broer, Agnes A. R., Rinze Benedictus, and Dimitrios Zarouchas. 2022. “The Need for Multi-Sensor Data Fusion in Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Aircraft Structures.” Aerospace 9 (4): 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9040183
  • Broglio, Luigi. 1957. “The Balance Method Applied to Swept-Wing Stress Analysis.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 24 (5): 363–70. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.3851
  • Brooks, Timothy R., and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2018. “On Manufacturing Constraints for Tow-Steered Composite Design Optimization.” Composite Structures 204: 548–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.100
  • Brooks, Timothy R., Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, and Graeme J. Kennedy. 2019. “High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization of Tow-Steered Composite Wings.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 88: 122–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.04.005
  • Broussard, John R., and Robert F. Stengel. 1977. “Stability of the Pilot-Aircraft System in Maneuvering Flight.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (10): 959–65. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44630
  • Brouwer, Kirk R., and Jack J. McNamara. 2020. “Surrogate-Based Aeroelastic Loads Prediction in the Presence of Shock-Induced Separation.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 93: 102838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102838
  • Brüderlin, Manuel, Norbert Hosters, and Marek Behr. 2018. “Reduced-Order Model for Robust Aeroelastic Control.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 10 (2): 367–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0322-3
  • Bryson, Arthur E., Mukund N. Desai, and William C. Hoffman. 1969. “Energy-State Approximation in Performance Optimization of Supersonicaircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 6 (6): 481–88. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44093
  • Bryson, Dean E., and Markus P. Rumpfkeil. 2019. “Aerostructural Design Optimization Using a Multifidelity Quasi-Newton Method.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (5): 2019–31. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035152
  • Bu, Xiangwei, Ruining Luo, Jiaxi Chen, and Humin Lei. 2025. “Fragility-Rejection UAV Flight Control with Discrete-Time Constrained Dynamics Endowing Preselected Qualities.” IEEE Journal on Miniaturization for Air and Space Systems 6 (1): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/jmass.2024.3507735
  • Bueno, Douglas D., and Earl H. Dowell. 2020. “Revisiting the Fundamentals of Control Surface Reversal Including Nonlinear Effects.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (6): 1212–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035885
  • Buffington, J. M., and R. J. Adams. 1995. “Nonlinear Vortex Flow Control for High-Angle-of-Attack Maneuvering.” Control Engineering Practice 3 (5): 631–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(95)00039-w
  • Burdette, David A., and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2018. “Design of a Transonic Wing with an Adaptive Morphing Trailing Edge via Aerostructural Optimization.” Aerospace Science and Technology 81: 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.004
  • Burkhalter, John E. 1993. “Downwash Measurements on a Pitching Canard-Wing Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 30 (6): 1005–8. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46447
  • Burt, Glen E. 1975. “Forced-Oscillation Test Mechanism for Measuring Dynamic-Stability Derivatives in Roll.” Journal of Aircraft 12 (1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59795
  • Butler, G. F. 1982. “Effect of Downwash on the Induced Drag of Canard-Wing Combinations.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (5): 410–11. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44764
  • Buzica, Andrei, Manuel Biswanger, and Christian Breitsamter. 2018. “Detached Eddy-Simulation of Delta-Wing Post-Stall Flow Control.” Transportation Research Procedia 29: 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.02.005
  • Çabuk, Nihat. 2026. “Design and Implementation of Real-Time Dihedral Angle Control for Enhanced Flight Stability of Quadrotor UAV.” Aerospace Science and Technology 173: 111844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.111844
  • Cagdas, Izzet U. 2017. “Optimal Design of Variable Stiffness Laminated Composite Truncated Cones under Lateral External Pressure.” Ocean Engineering 145: 268–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.011
  • Cahn, M. S., and J. R. Garcia. 1971. “Transonic Airfoil Design.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (2): 84–88. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44233
  • Cai, Zemin, Zhengyuan Fan, Tianshu Liu, and Kumaran Kannaiyan. 2026. “Neural Network Model for Predicting Aerodynamic Parameters of Airfoils.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (3): 934–49. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038462
  • Caixeta, P. R., and F. D. Marques. 2018. “Multiobjective Optimization of an Aircraft Wing Design with Respect to Structural and Aeroelastic Characteristics Using Neural Network Metamodel.” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 40 (1): 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0958-7
  • Calarese, Wladimiro. 1984. “Close-Coupled Canard-Wing Vortex Interaction.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (2): 99–100. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48231
  • Calise, Anthony J. 1977. “Extended Energy Management Methods for Flight Performance Optimization.” AIAA Journal 15 (3): 314–21. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.63239
  • Callaghan, Patrick M., and Donald L. Kunz. 2021. “Evaluation of Unmanned Aircraft Flying/Handling Qualities Using a Stitched Learjet Model.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 44 (4): 842–53. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004748
  • Camacho, Pedro, Hamed Akhavan, and Pedro Ribeiro. 2021. “Linear Aeroelastic Analysis of Cantilever Hybrid Composite Laminated Plates with Curvilinear Fibres and Carbon Nanotubes.” Composite Structures 266: 113765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113765
  • Campagna, Dario, Ivano Benedetti, and Vincenzo Gulizzi. 2025b. “Variable-Order Framework for Aeroelastic Flutter Analysis of Laminated Composite Wings.” Composite Structures 371: 119508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119508
  • Campagna, Dario, Vincenzo Gulizzi, and Ivano Benedetti. 2025a. “A DG-VLM Framework for Computational Static Aeroelastic Analysis of Composite Wings.” Composite Structures 353: 118697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118697
  • Campos, Luís M. B. C., and Joaquim M. G. Marques. 2021. “On the Handling Qualities of Two Flying Wing Aircraft Configurations.” Aerospace 8 (3): 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8030077
  • Candon, Michael, Pier Marzocca, and Earl H. Dowell. 2026. “Aeroelastic Reduced-Order Model Differential Equations in Transonic Buffeting Flow.” AIAA Journal 64 (10): 5882–99. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j066515
  • Cannella, Ferdinando, Alberto Garinei, Roberto Marsili, and Emanuela Speranzini. 2018. “Dynamic Mechanical Analysis and Thermoelasticity for Investigating Composite Structural Elements Made with Additive Manufacturing.” Composite Structures 185: 466–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.029
  • Cano, Alfredo, and Kenneth Sobel. 2016. “Simple Adaptive Delta Operator Aircraft Flight Control for Accommodation of Loss of Control Effectiveness.” Engineering 08 (04): 173–95. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2016.84016
  • Cao, Chenhui, Mou Chen, Kenan Yong, and Jiawen Yang. 2026. “Reinforcement Learning-Based Prescribed Performance Control for Aircraft Carrier Landing Using Direct Side Force.” Neurocomputing 669: 132460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.132460
  • Cao, Zhiru, Tinggang Jia, and Yugang Niu. 2020. “Self-Triggered Sliding Mode Control for Digital Fly-by-Wire Aircraft System.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 357 (15): 10492–10512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.08.028
  • Cao, Rui, and Yanbin Liu. 2025. “Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control with Unknown Control Effectiveness and Actuator Dynamic.” Aerospace Science and Technology 160: 110036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110036
  • Cao, Rui, and Kelin Lu. 2024. “Trajectory Tracking Control of Variable Sweep Aircraft Based on Reinforcement Learning.” Biomimetics 9 (5): 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9050263
  • Carlson, Leland A. 1976. “Transonic Airfoil Analysis and Design Using Cartesian Coordinates.” Journal of Aircraft 13 (5): 349–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58667
  • Carrera, Erasmo, Alberto Varello, and Luciano Demasi. 2013. “A Refined Structural Model for Static Aeroelastic Response and Divergence of Metallic and Composite Wings.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 4 (2): 175–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-013-0063-2
  • Castañeda, Herman, and J. L. Gordillo. 2019. “Embedded Flight Control Based on Adaptive Sliding Mode Strategy for a Quadrotor Micro Air Vehicle.” Electronics 8 (7): 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8070793
  • Castellani, Michele, Jonathan E. Cooper, and Yves Lemmens. 2017. “Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity of High-Aspect-Ratio-Wing Aircraft by Finite Element and Multibody Methods.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (2): 548–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033825
  • Cavalcanti, João, Alan Fonseca Uehara, Bruno Giordano de Oliveira Silva, and Roberto Gil Annes da Silva. 2026. “Analysis of Structural Flexibility Effects on Handling Qualities Using Variable Stability Simulations.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (3): 1257–70. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038528
  • Cavaliere, Davide, and Nicolas Fezans. 2024. “Toward Automated Gust Load Alleviation Control Design via Discrete Gust Impulse Filters.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (4): 697–710. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007762
  • Cavaliere, Davide, Nicolas Fezans, Daniel Kiehn, Julius Schulz, and Ulrich Römer. 2024. “Linear Modeling of Doppler Wind Lidar Systems for Gust Load Alleviation Design.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (11): 2351–68. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008040
  • Cavallaro, R., R. Bombardieri, L. Demasi, and A. Iannelli. 2015. “PrandtlPlane Joined Wing: Body Freedom Flutter, Limit Cycle Oscillation and Freeplay Studies.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 59: 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.08.016
  • Cebeci, Tuncer. 1974. “Attachment-Line Flow on an Infinite Swept Wing.” AIAA Journal 12 (2): 242–45. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49207
  • Cestino, Enrico, and Annamaria Iannuzzo. 2026. “Impact of Control Surface Stiffness on Aeroelastic Divergence and Reversal.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (3): 1344–48. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038607
  • Chai, Yu-Yang, Zhi-Guang Song, and Feng-Ming Li. 2017. “Active Aerothermoelastic Flutter Suppression of Composite Laminated Panels with Time-Dependent Boundaries.” Composite Structures 179: 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.053
  • Chajjed, Sandip, Mohammad Khalil, Dominique Poirel, Chris Pettit, and Abhijit Sarkar. 2024. “Probabilistic Prediction of Coalescence Flutter Using Measurements: Application to the Flutter Margin Method.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 571: 117819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2023.117819
  • Chakravarthy, Animesh, Katie A. Evans, Lisa M. Kuhn, and Jonathan B. Walters. 2015. “Frequency and Time Domain Analysis of an Aeroelastic Wing Multiple Component Structure.” Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization 36 (9): 1122–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01630563.2015.1057286
  • Chakravarty, Arghya, and Chitralekha Mahanta. 2015. “Actuator Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC) Design with Post-Fault Transient Improvement for Application to Aircraft Control: ACTUATOR FTC WITH IMPROVED POST FAULT TRANSIENTS.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 26 (10): 2049–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3392
  • Chalk, Charles R. 1964. “Simulator Investigation of the Effects of l Alpha and True Speed on Longitudinal Handling Qualities.” Journal of Aircraft 1 (6): 335–44. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43604
  • Chang, Jing, Roeland De Breuker, and Xuerui Wang. 2022a. “Active Fault-Tolerant Incremental Sliding-Mode Flight Control against Control Reversal.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (12): 2411–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006690
  • Chang, Jing, Zongyi Guo, Roeland De Breuker, and Xuerui Wang. 2022b. “Predictor-Based Adaptive Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Fault-Tolerant Flight Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 55 (6): 730–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.214
  • Changchuan, Xie, Yang Lan, Liu Yi, and Yang Chao. 2018. “Stability of Very Flexible Aircraft with Coupled Nonlinear Aeroelasticity and Flight Dynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (2): 862–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034162
  • Changchuan, Xie, Chen Zhiying, and An Chao. 2022. “Aeroelastic Response of a Z-Shaped Folding Wing during the Morphing Process.” AIAA Journal 60 (5): 3166–79. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j061138
  • Chatterjee, Tanmoy, Rajib Chowdhury, and Palaniappan Ramu. 2019. “Decoupling Uncertainty Quantification from Robust Design Optimization.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 59 (6): 1969–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2167-0
  • Chau, Timothy, Michael G. Piotrowski, and Jared C. Duensing. 2026. “Aerodynamic Optimization of a Cruise-Slotted Transonic Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038646
  • Chau, Timothy, and David W. Zingg. 2022. “Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Transonic Strut-Braced-Wing Regional Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (1): 253–71. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036389
  • Chau, Timothy, and David W. Zingg. 2023. “Aerodynamic Optimization and Fuel Burn Evaluation of a Transonic Strut-Braced-Wing Single-Aisle Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (5): 1638–58. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037158
  • Chauhan, Shamsheer S., and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2021. “RANS-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Wing Considering Propeller–Wing Interaction.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (3): 497–513. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035991
  • Chauhan, Shamsheer S., and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2024. “RANS-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Wing with a Propeller in Front of the Wingtip.” Aerospace 11 (7): 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11070512
  • Chen, Lee-Tzong. 1982. “Improved Finite-Difference Scheme for Transonic Airfoil Flowfield Calculations.” AIAA Journal 20 (2): 218–26. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.51069
  • Chen, Xinquan, Kai-Yuan Cai, and Quan Quan. 2026b. “Passive Fault-Tolerant Control of Lifting-Wing Quadrotors: Ensuring Nondegraded Flight under Rotor or Aileron Failure.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 73 (5): 7318–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2025.3639811
  • Chen, Y. M., D. H. Chen, and J. K. Liu. 2019b. “Subcritical Limit Cycle in Airfoil Aeroelastic System with Freeplay: Prediction and Mechanism.” AIAA Journal 57 (10): 4482–89. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058522
  • Chen, Gun-Shing, and John Dugundji. 1987. “Experimental Aeroelastic Behavior of Forward-Swept Graphite/epoxy Wings with Rigid-Body Freedom.” Journal of Aircraft 24 (7): 454–62. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45501
  • Chen, L., C. Edwards, and H. Alwi. 2018d. “Integral Sliding Mode Fault-Tolerant Control Allocation for a Class of Affine Nonlinear System.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 29 (3): 565–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4282
  • Chen, Lejun, Christopher Edwards, Halim Alwi, and Masayuki Sato. 2020a. “Flight Evaluation of a Sliding Mode Online Control Allocation Scheme for Fault Tolerant Control.” Automatica 114: 108829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108829
  • Chen, Lejun, Christopher Edwards, Halim Alwi, and Masayuki Sato. 2022c. “Simultaneous Fault and Input Time Delay Estimation for an Actuator System: Theory and Flight Data Validation.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 6: 1172–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2021.3090654
  • Chen, Wengang, Chuanqiang Gao, Yiming Gong, and Weiwei Zhang. 2020d. “Shape Optimization to Improve the Transonic Fluid-Structure Interaction Stability by an Aerodynamic Unsteady Adjoint Method.” Aerospace Science and Technology 103: 105871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105871
  • Chen, Hao, Chuanqiang Gao, Jifei Wu, Kai Ren, and Weiwei Zhang. 2023e. “Study on Optimization Design of Airfoil Transonic Buffet with Reinforcement Learning Method.” Aerospace 10 (5): 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10050486
  • Chen, Wengang, Chuanqiang Gao, Weiwei Zhang, and Yiming Gong. 2022b. “Adjoint-Based Unsteady Shape Optimization to Suppress Transonic Buffet.” Aerospace Science and Technology 127: 107668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107668
  • Chen, Jie, Ruofan Han, Dekun Liu, and Wei Zhang. 2022a. “Active Flutter Suppression and Aeroelastic Response of Functionally Graded Multilayer Graphene Nanoplatelet Reinforced Plates with Piezoelectric Patch.” Applied Sciences 12 (3): 1244. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031244
  • Chen, Hai, Lei He, Weiqi Qian, and Song Wang. 2020c. “Multiple Aerodynamic Coefficient Prediction of Airfoils Using a Convolutional Neural Network.” Symmetry 12 (4): 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040544
  • Chen, Shuang, Pengzhen He, and Shuling Tian. 2025c. “Numerical Method for Aeroelastic Simulation of Flexible Aircraft in High Maneuver Flight Based on Rigid–Flexible Model.” Applied Sciences 15 (8): 4333. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084333
  • Chen, Ci, and Anthony Holohan. 2015. “Stability Robustness of Linear Quadratic Regulators.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 26 (9): 1817–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3362
  • Chen, Jie, and Qiu-Sheng Li. 2017. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Flutter and Dynamic Response of Composite Laminated Cylindrical Shell in Supersonic Air Flow.” Composite Structures 168: 474–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.019
  • Chen, Zhipeng, Haojie Li, Hang Yu, Yuan Zhao, Chuanhao Zhang, and He Zhang. 2024. “Research on UAV Flight Parameter Identification Method Based on Launch Force and Airspeed.” Sensors 24 (5): 1597. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051597
  • Chen, Gang, Dongfeng Li, Qiang Zhou, Andrea Da Ronch, and Yueming Li. 2018c. “Efficient Aeroelastic Reduced Order Model with Global Structural Modifications.” Aerospace Science and Technology 76: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.023
  • Chen, Mingqian, Peiqing Liu, Hao Guo, and Qiulin Qu. 2016. “Effect of Sideslip on High-Angle-of-Attack Vortex Flow over Close-Coupled Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (1): 217–30. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033305
  • Chen, C. F., and Bruce J. Mangione. 1967. “Effect of Flow Shear on Induced Drag.” AIAA Journal 5 (11): 2056–2056. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4365
  • Chen, Xiaoming, Lisha Meng, Jiaji Liu, and Danqing Shen. 2025b. “Attitude Control of Variable Swept-Wing Aircraft: A Novel Composite Control Strategy.” Aerospace Science and Technology 160: 110043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110043
  • Chen, Xiaodong, Guojun Nie, and Zhangming Wu. 2018b. “Dynamic Instability of Variable Angle Tow Composite Plates with Delamination.” Composite Structures 187: 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.042
  • Chen, Fuyang, Juan Niu, and Gengqian Jiang. 2018e. “Nonlinear Fault-Tolerant Control for Hypersonic Flight Vehicle with Multi-Sensor Faults.” IEEE Access 6: 25427–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2820008
  • Chen, Xianjia, Zhiping Qiu, Xiaojun Wang, Yunlong Li, and Ruixing Wang. 2017c. “Uncertain Reduced-Order Modeling for Unsteady Aerodynamics with Interval Parameters and Its Application on Robust Flutter Boundary Prediction.” Aerospace Science and Technology 71: 214–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.09.018
  • Chen, Yifu, Hanyue Rao, Yiju Deng, Tihao Yang, Yayun Shi, and Junqiang Bai. 2023c. “Adjoint-Based Robust Optimization Design of Laminar Flow Wing under Flight Condition Uncertainties.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 36 (6): 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.03.039
  • Chen, J. K., and C. T. Sun. 1987. “Nonlinear Analysis of Interlaminar Stress in Graphite/epoxy Laminates with and without Delamination Cracks.” Composite Structures 8 (4): 271–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(87)90019-5
  • Chen, Yuyan, Wei Wang, Zijian Ni, Puxi Zhang, Yuchen Wang, and Yi Ji. 2026a. “Neural-Network-Based Aerodynamic Modeling and Fixed-Time Neuro-Adaptive Control of a Novel “Diamond-Wing” Morphing Aircraft.” Aerospace Science and Technology 176: 112682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.112682
  • Chen, Zhiqiang, Chaoyang Zhai, Xiang Li, Xiaolu Wang, Zhanhe Liu, and Xinzhe Zhang. 2025a. “Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for Flutter Suppression with Time-Varying Delay.” Advances in Aerodynamics 7 (1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-025-00227-2
  • Cheng, Lingquan, Yiyang Li, Jiayi Yuan, Jianliang Ai, and Yiqun Dong. 2023. “L1 Adaptive Control Based on Dynamic Inversion for Morphing Aircraft.” Aerospace 10 (9): 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10090786
  • Cheng, Lin, Xuan Liang, Jiaxi Bai, Qian Chen, John Lemon, and Albert To. 2019. “On Utilizing Topology Optimization to Design Support Structure to Prevent Residual Stress Induced Build Failure in Laser Powder Bed Metal Additive Manufacturing.” Additive Manufacturing 27: 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.001
  • Cheng, Songsong, Yiheng Wei, Yuquan Chen, Yong Wang, and Qing Liang. 2017. “Fractional-Order Multivariable Composite Model Reference Adaptive Control.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 31 (10): 1467–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2779
  • Chetty, S., and P. Lakshmi. 1991. “Computer Aided Evaluation of Aircraft Handling Qualities.” IFAC Proceedings Volumes 24 (4): 435–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-6670(17)54311-6
  • Chiarelli, Mario Rosario, and Salvatore Bonomo. 2019. “Numerical Investigation into Flutter and Flutter-Buffet Phenomena for a Swept Wing and a Curved Planform Wing.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2019: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8210235
  • Chin, Hubert H. 1989. “Knowledge-Based System of Supermaneuver Selection for Pilot Aiding.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (12): 1111–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45888
  • Chin, Sung-Mu, Chung-Oh Lee, and Pyung H. Chang. 1994. “An Experimental Study on the Position Control of an Electrohydraulic Servo System Using Time Delay Control.” Control Engineering Practice 2 (1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(94)90572-x
  • Chinvorarat, Sinchai. 2021. “Composite Wing Structure of Light Amphibious Airplane Design, Optimization, and Experimental Testing.” Heliyon 7 (11): e08410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08410
  • Chipman, Richard R., Alex M. Zislin, and Catherine Waters. 1983. “Control of Aeroelastic Divergence.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (12): 1007–13. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48204
  • Choi, Jaewan, and Younghoon Choi. 2026. “Distributed Formation Control Method with Hierarchical Leader–Follower Architecture and Repulsive Function-Based Obstacle Avoidance for UAV Formation Flight.” Aerospace 13 (6): 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060526
  • Choi, Jongkwan, Hyeon Min Kim, Ha Jun Hwang, Yong-Duk Kim, and Chang Ouk Kim. 2023. “Modular Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous UAV Flight Control.” Drones 7 (7): 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070418
  • Choi, Won, and Hyunbum Park. 2019. “Optimized Design and Analysis of Composite Flexible Wing Using Aero-Nonlinear Structure Interaction.” Composite Structures 225: 111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111027
  • Chougule, Nagesh, and Vinit Sonawane. 2017. “Additive Manufacturing Rectangular Lattice Structure Design Automation.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3101358
  • Chowdary, T. V. R., S. Parthan, and P. K. Sinha. 1994. “Finite Element Flutter Analysis of Laminated Composite Panels.” Computers & Structures 53 (2): 245–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90200-3
  • Chowhan, Kishan Singh, Hemendra Arya, and Girish S. Deodhare. 2019. “Technical Measures Perspectives in Selection of Handling Qualities Criteria for Flight Control Design.” INCOSE International Symposium 29 (S1): 429–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2019.00697.x
  • Christoforou, Andreas P. 1993. “On the Contact of a Spherical Indenter and a Thin Composite Laminate.” Composite Structures 26 (1–2): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(93)90046-s
  • Cid Montoya, M., S. Hernández, and F. Nieto. 2018. “Shape Optimization of Streamlined Decks of Cable-Stayed Bridges Considering Aeroelastic and Structural Constraints.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 177: 429–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.018
  • Clark, R. N., and X. J. Y. LeTron. 1989. “Oblique Wing Aircraft Flight Control System.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 12 (2): 201–8. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20392
  • Cochran, John E. 2015. “Aircraft Flight Dynamics and Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 38 (2): 356–57. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000628
  • Coder, James G. 2021. “Design of Low-Speed Slotted, Natural-Laminar-Flow Airfoil Reproducing Transonic Behaviors.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (3): 526–35. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035887
  • Coder, James G. 2026. “Transonic Wind-Tunnel Testing of a Slotted, Natural-Laminar-Flow Wing at Full-Scale Conditions.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-00956-0
  • Coe, Paul L., and D. Kulla. 1974. “Effect of Upper-Surface Blowing on Static Longitudinal Stability of a Swept Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 11 (9): 537–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60383
  • Cole, Stanley R. 1988a. “Divergence Study of a High-Aspect-Ratio, Forward Swept Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (5): 478–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45609
  • Cong, Jiping, Jianbo Hu, Yingyang Wang, Zihou He, Linxiao Han, and Maoyu Su. 2023. “Fault-Tolerant Attitude Control Incorporating Reconfiguration Control Allocation for Supersonic Tailless Aircraft.” Aerospace 10 (3): 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10030241
  • Conlan-Smith, Cian, and Casper Schousboe Andreasen. 2022. “Aeroelastic Shape Optimization of Solid Foam Core Wings Subject to Large Deformations.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 65 (6): 161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03246-5
  • Contell Asins, Conchin, Volker Landersheim, Dominik Laveuve, et al. 2021. “Analysis and Design of a Leading Edge with Morphing Capabilities for the Wing of a Regional Aircraft—Gapless Chord- and Camber-Increase for High-Lift Performance.” Applied Sciences 11 (6): 2752. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062752
  • Cooper, P. A., and W. J. Stroud. 1972. “Selective Reinforcement of Wing Structure for Flutter Prevention.” Journal of Aircraft 9. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730028903
  • Coppin, Joe, Trevor Birch, David Kennett, George Hoholis, and Kenneth Badcock. 2018. “Prediction of Control Effectiveness for a Highly Swept Unmanned Air Vehicle Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (2): 534–48. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033988
  • Cordeiro, Rafael A., José R. Azinheira, and Alexandra Moutinho. 2024. “A Pair of Two-Stage Kalman Filters to Detect and Isolate Failures in Aircraft with Redundant Actuators.” Control Engineering Practice 147: 105909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.105909
  • Cornelius, Kenneth C., and Gerald A. Lucius. 1994. “Side Force Augmentation at High Angle of Attack from Pneumatic Vortex Control.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (4): 818–25. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46566
  • Craig, Roy R., and I. Onur Erbug. 1976. “Application of a Gradient-Projection Method to Minimum Weight Design of a Delta Wing with Static and Aeroelastic Constraints.” Computers & Structures 6 (6): 529–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(76)90049-3
  • Craver, W. L., and D. M. Egle. 1972. “A Method for Selection of Significant Terms in the Assumed Solution in a Rayleigh-Ritz Analysis.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 22 (2): 133–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(72)90530-5
  • Crews, J. H., and R. A. Naik. 1986. “Combined Bearing and Bypass Loading on a Graphite/epoxy Laminate.” Composite Structures 6 (1–3): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(86)90066-8
  • Crimi, Peter, and Donald Earl Ordway. 1962. “Flutter Analysis of Supersonic Ring Wing.” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 29 (5): 578–82. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.9560
  • Crisfield, M. A. 1978. “A Combined Rayleigh-Ritz/finite Element Method for the Nonlinear Analysis of Stiffened Plated Structures.” Computers & Structures 8 (6): 679–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(78)90144-x
  • Crittenden, J. B., T. A. Weishaar, E. H. Johnson, and M. J. Rutkowski. 1978. “Aeroelastic Stability Characteristics of an Oblique-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (7): 429–34. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58383
  • Crouse, G. L., and J. G. Leishman. 1992. “Transonic Aeroelasticity Analysis Using State-Space Unsteady Aerodynamic Modeling.” Journal of Aircraft 29 (1): 153–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46139
  • Cui, Yuan, Jiandong He, Qiuhong Li, and Bokai Zhang. 2025. “Multi-Point Optimization Design of Blended Wing Body Based on Discrete Adjoint Method.” Aerospace 12 (5): 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050404
  • Cui, Da, Daokui Li, and Shiming Zhou. 2022. “Design of Bend-Twist Coupled Rectangular Composite Beams Based on Extension-Twist Multicoupled Laminates.” Ocean Engineering 266: 113138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113138
  • Cui, Da, Muyao Miao, Yuanzhi Xiong, and Daokui Li. 2026. “Critical Buckling Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Hygrothermally Stable Laminates with Extension-Twist and Bend-Twist Couplings.” Composite Structures 389: 120413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2026.120413
  • Cunis, Torbjørn, Laurent Burlion, and Jean-Philippe Condomines. 2019. “Piecewise Polynomial Modeling for Control and Analysis of Aircraft Dynamics beyond Stall.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (4): 949–57. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003618
  • Cunis, Torbjørn, Jean-Philippe Condomines, and Laurent Burlion. 2020b. “Sum-of-Squares Flight Control Synthesis for Deep-Stall Recovery.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (8): 1498–1511. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004753
  • Cunis, Torbjørn, Jean-Philippe Condomines, Laurent Burlion, and Anders la Cour-Harbo. 2020a. “Dynamic Stability Analysis of Aircraft Flight in Deep Stall.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (1): 143–55. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035455
  • Cunningham, Herbert J., John T. Batina, and Robert M. Bennett. 1988. “Modern Wing Flutter Analysis by Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (10): 962–68. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45686
  • Curtiss, H. C. 1971. “Comment on ‘Minimum Control Power for VTOL Aircraft Stability Augmentation’.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (4): 0288a-0288a. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59098
  • D’Amico, William, Alessio La Bella, and Marcello Farina. 2025. “Data-Driven Control of Echo State-Based Recurrent Neural Networks with Robust Stability Guarantees.” Systems & Control Letters 195: 105974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2024.105974
  • d’Apolito, Francesco, and Christoph Sulzbachner. 2021. “Flight Control of a Multicopter Using Reinforcement Learning.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 54 (13): 251–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.454
  • Da Ronch, Andrea, Jernej Drofelnik, Michel P. C. van Rooij, Johan C. Kok, Marco Panzeri, and Arne Voß. 2019. “Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Uncertainty Quantification of NATO STO AVT-251 Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle.” Aerospace Science and Technology 91: 627–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.04.057
  • Dababneh, Odeh, Timoleon Kipouros, and James Whidborne. 2018. “Application of an Efficient Gradient-Based Optimization Strategy for Aircraft Wing Structures.” Aerospace 5 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5010003
  • Dagal, Idriss. 2026. “Probabilistic Fault Tree Analysis and Dynamic Redundancy Optimization for Next-Generation Avionic Flight Control Systems.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 266: 111841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111841
  • Daghighi, Shahrzad, Mohammad Rouhi, Giovanni Zucco, and Paul M. Weaver. 2020. “Bend-Free Design of Ellipsoids of Revolution Using Variable Stiffness Composites.” Composite Structures 233: 111630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111630
  • Dagilis, Mindaugas, and Sigitas Kilikevičius. 2023. “Aeroelasticity Model for Highly Flexible Aircraft Based on the Vortex Lattice Method.” Aerospace 10 (9): 801. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10090801
  • Dagkolu, Akin, Istemihan Gokdag, and Oguzhan Yilmaz. 2021. “Design and Additive Manufacturing of a Fatigue-Critical Aerospace Part Using Topology Optimization and L-PBF Process.” Procedia Manufacturing 54: 238–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.07.037
  • Dai, Yuting, Yating Hu, You Wu, Chen Song, and Chao Yang. 2025. “Effect of Leading-Edge and Trailing-Edge Camber Morphing on Gust Load for an Elastic Wing.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 38 (4): 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.09.021
  • Daken, H. H., and J. W. Mar. 1985. “Splitting Initiation and Propagation in Notched Unidirectional Graphite/epoxy Composites under Tension-Tension Cyclic Loading.” Composite Structures 4 (2): 111–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(85)90002-9
  • Damodaran, Murali, and David A. Caughey. 1988. “Finite-Volume Calculation of Inviscid Transonic Airfoil-Vortex Interaction.” AIAA Journal 26 (11): 1346–53. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10046
  • Darabi, Mehdi, and Rajamohan Ganesan. 2016. “Non-Linear Dynamic Instability Analysis of Laminated Composite Cylindrical Shells Subjected to Periodic Axial Loads.” Composite Structures 147: 168–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.064
  • Darabi, Mehdi, and Rajamohan Ganesan. 2017. “Non-Linear Vibration and Dynamic Instability of Internally-Thickness-Tapered Composite Plates under Parametric Excitation.” Composite Structures 176: 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.059
  • Darabseh, Tariq, Abdallah Tarabulsi, and Abdel-Hamid I. Mourad. 2022. “Discrete-Time Model Predictive Controller Using Laguerre Functions for Active Flutter Suppression of a 2D Wing with a Flap.” Aerospace 9 (9): 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9090475
  • Das, H. N., and S. Kapuria. 2016. “On the Use of Bend–twist Coupling in Full-Scale Composite Marine Propellers for Improving Hydrodynamic Performance.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 61: 132–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.11.008
  • Das, A., and J. M. A. Longo. 1995. “Numerical Analysis of the Vortical Flow around a Delta Wing-Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (4): 716–25. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46782
  • Daudeville, L., and P. Ladevèze. 1993. “A Damage Mechanics Tool for Laminate Delamination.” Composite Structures 25 (1–4): 547–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(93)90203-3
  • Davanipour, M., A. Khayatian, and M. Dehghani. 2017. “Transient Performance Improvement of Model Reference Adaptive Control: LMI-Based Resetting.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 32 (2): 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2849
  • Dawe, Joseph S. A., Sam Bull, and Carl M. Sangan. 2025. “Lift Recovery in Post-Stall Region.” AIAA Journal 63 (8): 3352–64. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j064731
  • Dawe, D. J., and O. L. Roufaeil. 1980. “Rayleigh-Ritz Vibration Analysis of Mindlin Plates.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 69 (3): 345–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(80)90477-0
  • Daynes, Stephen. 2024. “Isotropic Cellular Structure Design Strategies Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces.” Additive Manufacturing 81: 104010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104010
  • De, Shuvodeep, Mohamed Jrad, and Rakesh K. Kapania. 2019. “Structural Optimization of Internal Structure of Aircraft Wings with Curvilinear Spars and Ribs.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (2): 707–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034818
  • De Gaspari, Alessandro, and Paolo Mantegazza. 2024. “Dual Loop PIm PIn Control for an Aileron Positioning.” IEEE Access 12: 56120–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3390557
  • De Gaspari, Alessandro, Luca Riccobene, and Sergio Ricci. 2018. “Design, Manufacturing and Wind Tunnel Validation of a Morphing Compliant Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (6): 2313–26. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034860
  • de Silva, B. M. E., and Ralph L. Carmichael. 1978. “Canard-Wing Shape Optimization with Aerodynamic Requirements.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (11): 705–6. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58435
  • de Souza, C. E., and D. M. De Leon. 2023. “A Two-Level Strategy for Aeroelastic Optimization of a 3D Wing with Constant and Variable Stiffness Skins.” Engineering Optimization 56 (8): 1278–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2023.2243455
  • de Souza, Alex dos Reis, Pierre Vuillemin, Charles Poussot-Vassal, and David Quero. 2023. “Gust Load Alleviation Using Reduced-Order Aeroelastic Models and Observer-Based Robust Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 46 (5): 949–57. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007153
  • DeAngelis, V. Michael. 1982. “In-Flight Deflection Measurement of the HiMAT Aeroelastically Tailored Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (12): 1088–94. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44816
  • “Deformational Behaviour of a Unidirectional Graphite/epoxy Composite under Compressive Fatigue.” 1990. Composites 21 (3): 267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(90)90242-o
  • Dehghan Manshadi, Ali, and Fariborz Saghafi. 2021. “Aircraft Mass Properties Estimation during Airdrop Maneuver: A Nonlinear Filtering Approach.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (5): 982–96. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035941
  • del Carre, Alfonso, and Rafael Palacios. 2020. “Simulation and Optimization of Takeoff Maneuvers of Very Flexible Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (6): 1097–1110. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035901
  • Demir, Gorkem, Recep M. Gorguluarslan, and Selin Aradag. 2023. “Robust Shape Optimization under Model Uncertainty of an Aircraft Wing Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Inductive Design Exploration Method.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 66 (4): 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03557-1
  • Deng, Feng, and Ning Qin. 2021. “Vortex-Generating Shock Control Bumps for Robust Drag Reduction at Transonic Speeds.” AIAA Journal 59 (10): 3900–3909. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j060528
  • Deng, Hao, Cristina Stoica, and Mohammed Chadli. 2024b. “Reconfiguration-Based Fault Tolerant Control Algorithm for LPV Descriptor Systems.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 58 (30): 290–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.01.196
  • Deng, Feng, and Jianmiao Yi. 2023. “Fast Inverse Design of Transonic Airfoils by Combining Deep Learning and Efficient Global Optimization.” Aerospace 10 (2): 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10020125
  • Deng, Feng, Jianmiao Yi, Guanhua Chen, and Ning Qin. 2026b. “Shock Control on a Double-Fuselage Aircraft with a Natural Laminar Flow Wing.” Aerospace 13 (6): 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060540
  • Deng, Feng, Shenghua Zhang, and Ning Qin. 2023. “Closed-Loop Control of Transonic Buffet Using Active Shock Control Bump.” Aerospace 10 (6): 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10060537
  • Deobald, L. R., and R. F. Gibson. 1988. “Determination of Elastic Constants of Orthotropic Plates by a Modal analysis/Rayleigh-Ritz Technique.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 124 (2): 269–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-460x(88)80187-1
  • Derkach, O. L., A. P. Zinkovskii, Ye. O. Onyshchenko, and К. V. Savchenko. 2022. “Notch-Type Damage Influence on the Frequency of the Principal Mode of the Composite Cantilever Beam Flexural Vibrations.” Procedia Structural Integrity 36: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.01.005
  • “Design of Discrete-Time Adaptive Control in Presence of Uncertain Time Delay.” 1995. Control Engineering Practice 3 (1): 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(95)90151-5
  • Deskos, Georgios, Alfonso del Carre, and Rafael Palacios. 2020. “Assessment of Low-Altitude Atmospheric Turbulence Models for Aircraft Aeroelasticity.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 95: 102981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102981
  • Dexl, Florian, Andreas Hauffe, and Klaus Wolf. 2020. “Multidisciplinary Multi-Objective Design Optimization of an Active Morphing Wing Section.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 62 (5): 2423–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02613-4
  • Dhiman, Kuldeep K., Abhishek, and Mangal Kotharic. 2022. “Flight Dynamics and Control of an Unmanned Helicopter with Underslung Double Pendulum.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (1): 137–53. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036390
  • Dhital, Kailash, and Benjamin Chouvion. 2024. “Passive Aeroelastic Control of a near-Ground Airfoil with a Nonlinear Vibration Absorber.” Aerospace 11 (12): 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11121043
  • Di Caprio, Francesco, Valerio Acanfora, Stefania Franchitti, Andrea Sellitto, and Aniello Riccio. 2019. “Hybrid Metal/Composite Lattice Structures: Design for Additive Manufacturing.” Aerospace 6 (6): 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6060071
  • Di Donato, Pedro F. A., Sweewarman Balachandran, Kevin McDonough, Ella Atkins, and Ilya Kolmanovsky. 2017. “Envelope-Aware Flight Management for Loss of Control Prevention Given Rudder Jam.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (4): 1027–41. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000252
  • Di Francesco, Gabriele, and Massimiliano Mattei. 2016. “Modeling and Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control of a Novel Unmanned Tiltrotor.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (1): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033183
  • Di Leone, Domenico, Francesco Lo Balbo, Alessandro De Gaspari, and Sergio Ricci. 2021. “Model Updating and Aeroelastic Correlation of a Scaled Wind Tunnel Model for Active Flutter Suppression Test.” Aerospace 8 (11): 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8110334
  • Di Pasquale, Davide, and Simon Prince. 2023. “Passive Transonic Shock Control on Bump Flow for Wing Buffet Suppression.” Aerospace 10 (6): 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10060569
  • Di Rito, G., and F. Schettini. 2016. “Impacts of Safety on the Design of Light Remotely-Piloted Helicopter Flight Control Systems.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 149: 121–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.012
  • Di Sante, Raffaella. 2015. “Fibre Optic Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Aircraft Composite Structures: Recent Advances and Applications.” Sensors 15 (8): 18666–18713. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150818666
  • Dias, Joaquim N. 2023. “Flight-Test Determination of Longitudinal Stability Using System Identification.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (5): 1659–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037252
  • Difranco, Dante A. 1970. “Higher-Order Control System Dynamics and Longitudinal Handling Qualities.” Journal of Aircraft 7 (5): 457–64. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44199
  • “Digital Model-Reference Flight Control of Aircraft with Unstable Sampling Zeros.” 1994. Control Engineering Practice 2 (5): 914. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(94)90529-0
  • Dillinger, Johannes K. S., Mostafa M. Abdalla, Yasser M. Meddaikar, and Thomas Klimmek. 2019. “Static Aeroelastic Stiffness Optimization of a Forward Swept Composite Wing with CFD-Corrected Aero Loads.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 10 (4): 1015–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-019-00397-y
  • Dillinger, Johannes K. S., Yasser M. Meddaikar, Jannis Lübker, Manuel Pusch, and Thiemo Kier. 2020. “Design and Optimization of an Aeroservoelastic Wind Tunnel Model.” Fluids 5 (1): 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5010035
  • Ding, Wenhao, Xiaoping Shi, and Changzhu Wei. 2025. “Adaptive Global Predefined-Time Control Method of Aerospace Aircraft.” Aerospace 12 (7): 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12070580
  • Ding, Haoqing, Bin Xu, Weibai Li, and Xiaodong Huang. 2022. “A Novel CS-RBFs-Based Parameterization Scheme for the Optimization Design of Curvilinear Variable-Stiffness Composites with Manufacturing Constraints.” Composite Structures 299: 116067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116067
  • Ding, Shuai, and Xiang Zhou. 2018. “Structural Design and Optimization of a Morphing Wing Trailing Edge Flap.” Aerospace Systems 1 (2): 109–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-018-0008-x
  • Dinler, Özlem Batur. 2025. “Enhanced Airfoil Design Optimization Using Hybrid Geometric Neural Networks and Deep Symbiotic Genetic Algorithms.” Applied Sciences 15 (20): 10882. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152010882
  • Divakar, Divyesh, and Rajalakshmi B. L. Samaga. 2026. “IA2UCS: An Intelligent Atmospheric-Adaptive UAV Control System Using Machine Learning and Real-Time Weather Integration for Enhanced Flight Stability.” Advanced Control for Applications 8 (2): e70054. https://doi.org/10.1002/adc2.70054
  • Dong, Zehong, Yinghui Li, and Maolong Lv. 2023. “Adaptive Nonsingular Fixed-Time Control for Hypersonic Flight Vehicle Considering Angle of Attack Constraints.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 33 (12): 6754–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6722
  • Dong, Chaoyang, Yao Lu, and Qing Wang. 2016. “Tracking Control Based on Control Allocation with an Innovative Control Effector Aircraft Application.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2016: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5037678
  • Dong, Boge, Yi Zhou, and Molong Duan. 2025. “Dynamic Load Alleviation of Input-Redundant Flexible Aircraft via Nonlinear Control Allocation over Invariant Manifold.” Aerospace Science and Technology 162: 110199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110199
  • Dooley, J. F. 1965. “On the Torsional Stiffness of Closed-Section Web Stiffeners.” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 7 (3): 183–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(65)90017-2
  • Dorey, A. D., M. C. Good, and P. N. Joubert. 1980. “A Variable Free Control Characteristic Vehicle.” Vehicle System Dynamics 9 (1): 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423118008968613
  • Duan, Molong, and Chinedum E. Okwudire. 2019. “Connections between Control Allocation and Linear Quadratic Control for Weakly Redundant Systems.” Automatica 101: 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2018.11.049
  • Duan, Jingbo, and Zhongyuan Zhang. 2018. “An Efficient Method for Nonlinear Flutter of the Flexible Wing with a High Aspect Ratio.” Aerospace Systems 1 (1): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-018-0009-9
  • Dubary, N., C. Bouvet, S. Rivallant, and L. Ratsifandrihana. 2018. “Damage Tolerance of an Impacted Composite Laminate.” Composite Structures 206: 261–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.045
  • Dubigeon, S. 1992. “Torsional Stiffness for Circular Orthotropic Beams.” AIAA Journal 30 (9): 2355–57. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11232
  • Dussart, Gaétan, Mudassir Lone, and Roger Bailey. 2019. “Development of a Multi-Directional Manoeuvre for Unified Handling Qualities Investigation.” Aerospace 6 (6): 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6060070
  • Dutta, Soumik, and Wei Zhao. 2025. “Buckling of Variable Angle Tow Steered Laminates Considering Gap/overlap Defects Identified Using Innovative Image Processing.” Composite Structures 368: 119221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119221
  • Dwivedi, Yagya Dutta, Duru Anitha, and Y. B. Sudhir Sastry. 2022. “Flow Field Study of Effect of Canard Location on Aircraft Aerodynamic Performance.” Macromolecular Symposia 402 (1): 2100364. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202100364
  • Eastep, F. E., and J. J. Olsen. 1980. “Transonic Flutter Analysis of a Rectangular Wing with Conventional Airfoil Sections.” AIAA Journal 18 (10): 1159–64. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.50866
  • Eastep, F. E., V. B. Venkayya, and V. A. Tishler. 1984. “Divergence Speed Degradation of Forward-Swept Wings with Damaged Composite Skin.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (11): 921–23. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45063
  • Ebrahimzade, Nima, Morteza Dardel, and Rouzbeh Shafaghat. 2016. “Performance Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Vibration Absorbers in Aeroelastic Characteristics of a Wing Model.” Nonlinear Dynamics 86 (2): 1075–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2948-1
  • Eckhaus, Wiktor. 1962. “A Theory of Transonic Aileron Buzz, Neglecting Viscous Effects.” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 29 (6): 712–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.9589
  • Edwards, John W. 1983. “Flight Test Results of an Active Flutter Suppression System.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (3): 267–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44863
  • Edwards, John W., and Carol D. Wieseman. 2008. “Flutter and Divergence Analysis Using the Generalized Aeroelastic Analysis Method.” Journal of Aircraft 45 (3): 906–15. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30078
  • “Effects of a Controlled Modulus Interlayer upon the Properties of Graphite/epoxy Composite.” 1988. Composites 19 (1): 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(88)90589-7
  • Efremov, Aleksandr, Eugene Efremov, and Mikhail Tiaglik. 2020. “Advancements in Predictions of Flying Qualities, Pilot-Induced Oscillation Tendencies, and Flight Safety.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (1): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004409
  • Ehlers, S. M., and T. A. Weisshaar. 1993. “Static Aeroelastic Control of an Adaptive Lifting Surface.” Journal of Aircraft 30 (4): 534–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46376
  • Eichler, Jay. 1970. “A Regression Analysis of Pilot-Induced Oscillation Ratings.” Journal of Aircraft 7 (4): 314–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44170
  • Ekaterinaris, J. A., and Lewis B. Schiff. 1994. “Numerical Simulation of Incidence and Sweep Effects on Delta Wing Vortex Breakdown.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (5). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950037635
  • El-Mahdy, Mostafa H., Abdelrahman O. Ali, O. H. Hassan, Eman M. El-Gendy, and Mahmoud M. Saafan. 2025. “Intelligent Fault Tolerance Control Using Long Short-Term Memory for Efficient System Performance under Fault Conditions.” Scientific Reports 15 (1): 16259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99500-z
  • Elham, Ali. 2015. “Adjoint Quasi-Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Solver for Multi-Fidelity Wing Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” Aerospace Science and Technology 41: 241–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.12.024
  • Elham, Ali, and Michel J. L. van Tooren. 2016a. “Coupled Adjoint Aerostructural Wing Optimization Using Quasi-Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Analysis.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 54 (4): 889–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1447-9
  • Elham, Ali, and Michel J. L. van Tooren. 2016b. “Multi-Fidelity Wing Aerostructural Optimization Using a Trust Region Filter-SQP Algorithm.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 55 (5): 1773–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1613-0
  • Elyasi, Meysam, Alireza Roudbari, and Pedram Hajipourzadeh. 2020. “Multi-Objective Robust Design Optimization (MORDO) of an Aeroelastic High-Aspect-Ratio Wing.” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 42 (11): 560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02633-7
  • Eney, John A. 1968. “Navy Variable-Stability Studies of Longitudinal Handling Qualities.” Journal of Aircraft 5 (3): 271–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43938
  • Enns, Dale, Hitay Ozbay, and Allen Tannenbaum. 1992. “Abstract Model and Controller Design for an Unstable Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 15 (2): 498–508. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20863
  • Er-El, J. 1988. “Effect of Wing/canard Interference on the Loading of a Delta Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (1): 18–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45535
  • Er-El, J., and A. Seginer. 1985. “Vortex Trajectories and Breakdown on Wing-Canard Configurations.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (8): 641–48. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45180
  • Esfahani, Ata, Nathan Webb, and Mo Samimy. 2018. “Stall Cell Formation over a Post-Stall Airfoil: Effects of Active Perturbations Using Plasma Actuators.” Experiments in Fluids 59 (9): 132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2588-y
  • Evald, Paulo Jefferson Dias de Oliveira, Guilherme Vieira Hollweg, Rodrigo Varella Tambara, and Hilton Abílio Gründling. 2023. “A Hybrid Robust Model Reference Adaptive Controller and Proportional Integral Controller without Reference Model for Partially Modeled Systems.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 37 (8): 2113–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3628
  • Ewing, M. S., R. J. Hinger, and A. W. Leissa. 1988. “On the Validity of the Reduced Bending Stiffness Method for Laminated Composite Plate Analysis.” Composite Structures 9 (4): 301–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(88)90050-5
  • Fan, Wenlong. 2026. “A Hierarchical Grid-Based Method for Wing Deformation Measurement.” In 2026 2nd International Conference on Electrical Automation and Artificial Intelligence (ICEAAI). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iceaai68945.2026.11442354
  • Fan, Zhida, Fenglan Wang, and Lijun Long. 2023. “Prescribed Performance Event-Triggered Control for MIMO Switched Nonlinear Systems with Unstable Subsystems.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 34 (2): 866–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.7006
  • Fan, Minglong, Lei Wang, Yi Sun, Jinwu Xiang, and Haiting Xia. 2025. “Aerodynamic Interference of Lift Surfaces during Transition Phase for VTOL Fixed-Wing UAVs with Canard Configuration.” Aerospace 12 (9): 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12090784
  • Fan, Zhouwei, Xiongqing Yu, Ning Qin, and Maolin Zhu. 2021. “Benefit Assessment of Low-Sweep Transonic Natural Laminar Flow Wing for Commercial Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (6): 1294–1301. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036138
  • Farsadi, Touraj, Majid Ahmadi, James Ellis, et al. 2026. “Gust Load Alleviation via Active Folding Wingtip Concept: Experimental Approach.” AIAA Journal: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j066652
  • Farsadi, Touraj, Majid Ahmadi, Melin Sahin, Hamed Haddad Khodaparast, Altan Kayran, and Michael I. Friswell. 2024. “High Aspect Ratio Composite Wings: Geometrically Nonlinear Aeroelasticity, Multi-Disciplinary Design Optimization, Manufacturing, and Experimental Testing.” Aerospace 11 (3): 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11030193
  • Farsadi, Touraj, Mohammad Rahmanian, and Altan Kayran. 2020. “Reduced Order Nonlinear Aeroelasticity of Swept Composite Wings Using Compressible Indicial Unsteady Aerodynamics.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 92: 102812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102812
  • “Fatigue Behaviour of Composite Laminate.” 1977. Composites 8 (1): 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(77)90034-9
  • Faure, Thierry M., Laurent Dumas, Vincent Drouet, and Olivier Montagnier. 2019. “A Modified Discrete-Vortex Method Algorithm with Shedding Criterion for Aerodynamic Coefficients Prediction at High Angle of Attack.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 69: 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.12.013
  • Favaro, Lorenzo, Agata Rylko, and Giuseppe Quaranta. 2025. “Building Credible VTOL Flight Models for Handling Quality Certification by Simulation.” Aerospace 12 (6): 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12060559
  • Favier, D., C. Maresca, A. Castex, and C. Barbi. 1987. “Vortex Influence on Oscillating Airfoils at High Angle of Attack.” Journal of Aircraft 24 (7): 424–32. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45497
  • Fazeli, S., C. Stokes-Griffin, J. Gilbert, and P. Compston. 2022. “Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Bend-Twist Coupling on the Vibrational Response of Multi-Layered Stepped Composite Beams.” Composite Structures 294: 115756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115756
  • Fazilati, J., and V. Khalafi. 2019b. “Effects of Embedded Perforation Geometry on the Free Vibration of Tow-Steered Variable Stiffness Composite Laminated Panels.” Thin-Walled Structures 144: 106287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106287
  • Fehrs, Michael, and Christoph Kaiser. 2025. “Transition Prediction Including Turbulent Wedges for a Forward Swept Natural Laminar Flow Wing.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 17 (1): 435–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00856-9
  • Feil, Roland, Tobias Pflumm, Pietro Bortolotti, and Marco Morandini. 2020. “A Cross-Sectional Aeroelastic Analysis and Structural Optimization Tool for Slender Composite Structures.” Composite Structures 253: 112755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112755
  • Feldt, Walter T., and George Herrmann. 1974. “Bending-Torsional Flutter of a Cantilevered Wing Containing a Tip Mass and Subjected to a Transverse Follower Force.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 297 (6): 467–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(74)90123-9
  • Feliu-Batlle, V. 2016. “Robust Isophase Margin Control of Oscillatory Systems with Large Uncertainties in Their Parameters: A Fractional-Order Control Approach.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 27 (12): 2145–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3677
  • Feng, Liangtao, Tingyu Guo, Chenhua Zhu, and Haixin Chen. 2023. “Control Design and Flight Test of Aerodynamics-Driven Monoplane–Biplane Morphing Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 46 (12): 2373–87. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007591
  • Feng, Guangkun, Fulin Liu, Mingkun Liu, and Zhenzhong Wei. 2024. “Wing Deformation-Aware Vision-Based Airplane Attitude Measurement.” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 73: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2024.3366272
  • Feng, Yue, Yongshun Wang, Zonghua Sun, Bin Xi, and Liaoni Wu. 2021. “Robust Modification of Nonlinear L1 Adaptive Flight Control System via Noise Attenuation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 117: 106938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106938
  • Feroskhan, Mir, and Tiauw H. Go. 2016. “Dynamics of Sideslip Perching Maneuver under Dynamic Stall Influence.” Aerospace Science and Technology 50: 220–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.01.005
  • Feroskhan, Mir, and Tiauw H. Go. 2018. “Control Strategy of Sideslip Perching Maneuver under Dynamic Stall Influence.” Aerospace Science and Technology 72: 150–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.002
  • Ferreres, G., and G. Hardier. 2017. “Adaptive LFT Control of a Civil Aircraft with Online Frequency-Domain Parameter Estimation.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 29 (16): 5356–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3993
  • Fichera, Sebastiano, Irma Isnardi, and John E. Mottershead. 2019. “High-Bandwidth Morphing Actuator for Aeroelastic Model Control.” Aerospace 6 (2): 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6020013
  • “Filamentary-Plastic Composite Laminate.” 1974. Composites 5 (6): 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(74)90417-0
  • Filippou, Evangelos, Spyridon Kilimtzidis, Athanasios Kotzakolios, and Vassilis Kostopoulos. 2024. “Towards Structural and Aeroelastic Similarity in Scaled Wing Models: Development of an Aeroelastic Optimization Framework.” Aerospace 11 (3): 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11030180
  • Fina, Marc, and Chiara Bisagni. 2025. “Buckling Design Optimization of Tow-Steered Composite Panels and Cylindrical Shells Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties.” Computational Mechanics 76 (1): 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02589-8
  • Fina, Marc, and Chiara Bisagni. 2026. “Neural Network-Based Structural Optimization of Tow-Steered Composite Panels Accounting for Polymorphic Uncertainty.” Composite Structures 387: 120323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2026.120323
  • Finkleman, David. 1972. “Nonlinear Vortex Interactions on Wing-Canard Configurations.” Journal of Aircraft 9 (6): 399–406. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59003
  • Flax, Alexander H. 1943. “Three-Dimensional Wing Flutter Analysis.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 10 (2): 41–47. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.10981
  • “Flight Performance Handbook for Powered Flight Operations.” 1963. Journal of the Franklin Institute 275 (6): 523. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(63)90546-5
  • Flores, Gerardo, Eric Bazán, and Hugo Moreno. 2025. “The SpHelico: A Coaxial Drone inside a Gimbal System. Modeling, Design, and Control.” Asian Journal of Control: asjc.70025. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.70025
  • Fontana, Joshua E., Pat Piperni, Zhi Yang, and Dimitri J. Mavriplis. 2024. “Aerostructural Wing Optimization Using a Structural Surrogate in a Coupled Adjoint Formulation.” AIAA Journal 62 (8): 3093–3110. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j063533
  • Fonte, Federico, Sergio Ricci, and Paolo Mantegazza. 2015. “Gust Load Alleviation for a Regional Aircraft through a Static Output Feedback.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (5): 1559–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c032995
  • Fournier, Hugo, Paolo Massioni, Minh Tu Pham, Laurent Bako, Robin Vernay, and Michele Colombo. 2022. “Robust Gust Load Alleviation of Flexible Aircraft Equipped with Lidar.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (1): 58–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006084
  • Franco, Roberto, Héctor Ríos, and Alejandra Ferreira de Loza. 2022. “Model Reference Adaptive Control: A Finite-Time Approach.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 36 (5): 1231–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3399
  • Franklin, James A., and Robert C. Innis. 1978. “Flight Evaluation of Flight-Path Control for the STQL Approach and Landing.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (1): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58306
  • Frost, Richard C., and Robbie Rutherford. 1963. “Subsonic Wing Span Efficiency.” AIAA Journal 1 (4): 931–33. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.1680
  • Fu, Bangsheng, Ya Yang, Hui Qi, Jiangtao Xu, and Shaobo Wang. 2021. “Modeling and Analysis of High Aspect Ratio Wing Considering Random Structural Parameters.” Scientific Reports 11 (1): 15609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95187-0
  • Fung, Chin-Ping, and Ji-Liang Doong. 1988. “Bending of a Bimodulus Laminated Plate Based on a Higher-Order Shear Deformation Theory.” Composite Structures 10 (2): 121–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(88)90043-8
  • Furtado, C., G. Catalanotti, A. Arteiro, P. J. Gray, B. L. Wardle, and P. P. Camanho. 2019. “Simulation of Failure in Laminated Polymer Composites: Building-Block Validation.” Composite Structures 226: 111168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111168
  • Furtat, Igor B., and Pavel A. Gushchin. 2021. “Stability/Instability Study and Control of Autonomous Dynamical Systems: Divergence Method.” IEEE Access 9: 23764–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3056942
  • “Fuzzy Logic for Control of Roll and Moment for a Flexible Wing Aircraft.” 1991. IEEE Control Systems 11 (4): 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.88591
  • Gabrys, Agnes Christine, Rasmus Steffensen, Rafael de Angelis Cordeiro, José Raul Azinheira, Alexandra Moutinho, and Florian Holzapfel. 2019. “Integration of Phase Plane Flight Envelope Protections in Cascaded Incremental Flight Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (12): 429–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.281
  • Galasso, Bernardino, Monica Ciminello, Gianvito Apuleo, David Bardenstein, and Antonio Concilio. 2024. “Performance Evaluation of Structural Health Monitoring System Applied to Full-Size Composite Wing Spar via Probability of Detection Techniques.” Sensors 24 (16): 5216. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165216
  • Galffy, A., M. Böck, and A. Kugi. 2019. “Nonlinear 3D Path Following Control of a Fixed-Wing Aircraft Based on Acceleration Control.” Control Engineering Practice 86: 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.03.006
  • Gallagher, J. T. 1971. “Requirements on Simulators Used in Handling Qualities Research.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (11): 917–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59189
  • Gamagedara, Kanishke, Taeyoung Lee, and Murray Snyder. 2024. “Delayed Kalman Filter for Vision-Based Autonomous Flight in Ocean Environments.” Control Engineering Practice 143: 105791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2023.105791
  • Gao, Mingzhou, and Guoping Cai. 2016. “Robust Fault-Tolerant Control for Wing Flutter under Actuator Failure.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 29 (4): 1007–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.06.014
  • Gao, Honggang, Zhenghong Gao, Yang Na, and Chao Pang. 2019. “Trim Strategy, Control Model, and Flight Dynamics Characteristics of Canard Rotor/Wing Aircraft in Transition Mode.” IEEE Access 7: 66042–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2917316
  • Gao, Wei, Yishu Liu, Qifu Li, and Bei Lu. 2024. “Gust Load Alleviation of a Flexible Flying Wing with Linear Parameter-Varying Modeling and Model Predictive Control.” Aerospace Science and Technology 155: 109671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109671
  • Garcia-Hernandez, Luis, Cristina Cuerno-Rejado, and Manuel Perez-Cortes. 2017. “Fault-Tolerant Certifiable Control for a V-Tail Remotely Piloted Aircraft System.” IEEE Access 5: 22363–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2758903
  • Garmendia, Daniel C., and Dimitri N. Mavris. 2016. “Alternative Trim Analysis Formulations for Vehicles with Redundant Multi-Axis Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (1): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033184
  • Garner, Eric, Jun Wu, and Amir A. Zadpoor. 2023. “An Insertability Constraint for Shape Optimization.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 66 (10): 220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03678-7
  • Gavra, Vlad, and Erik-Jan van Kampen. 2024. “Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning: Hybrid Approach for Safety-Informed Fault-Tolerant Flight Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (5): 887–900. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008112
  • Geisler, Hendrik, and Philipp Junker. 2024. “Uncertainty Quantification for Viscoelastic Composite Materials Using Time-Separated Stochastic Mechanics.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 76: 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103618
  • Gelos, Roberto, and Patricio A. A. Laura. 1990. “Comments on ‘Vibration Analysis of Plates with Cutouts by the Modified Rayleigh-Ritz Method’.” Applied Acoustics 29 (4): 325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-682x(90)90014-l
  • Geng, Yongliang, Meng Zhao, Xuewei Fang, et al. 2026. “Hybrid Additive Manufacturing of High Performance Ti/Al Dissimilar Metal Structure: Interfacial Design and Strengthening Mechanisms.” Additive Manufacturing 122: 105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2026.105207
  • Geoghegan, Jack A., Nicholas F. Giannelis, and Gareth A. Vio. 2020. “A Numerical Investigation of the Geometric Parametrisation of Shock Control Bumps for Transonic Shock Oscillation Control.” Fluids 5 (2): 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5020046
  • Gera, Joseph, Dominick Andrisani II, Jeffrey E. Bauer, and David B. Crawford. 1989. “Real-Time Comparison of X-29A Flight Data and Simulation Data.” Journal of Aircraft 26. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890040365
  • Ghazi, Yousef, Nahla Alhazmi, Radek Tezaur, and Charbel Farhat. 2022. “Training a Neural-Network-Based Surrogate Model for Aerodynamic Optimisation Using a Gaussian Process.” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 36 (7): 538–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2022.2138863
  • Gilbert, M. G., D. K. Schmidt, and T. A. Weisshaar. 1984. “Quadratic Synthhesis of Integrated Active Controls for an Aeroelastic Forward-Swept-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 7 (2): 190–96. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8566
  • Giles, Richard F. 1972. “An Analytical Investigation of Short-Period Flying Qualities.” Journal of Aircraft 9 (2): 103–7. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58942
  • GlBBINGS, J. C. 1969. “Aerodynamic Features of the Flap-Balanced Swivel-Airfoil (Aerodynamics of Flap Balanced Swivel Airfoils, Discussing Lift Curve Slope, Incidence Change Response and Application of Control Forces and Movements).” Journal of Hydronautics 3 (1): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48096
  • Gloss, Blair B., and Karen E. Washburn. 1978. “Load Distribution on a Close-Coupled Wing Canard at Transonic Speeds.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (4): 234–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58347
  • Goel, Raghavv, and Sayan Basu Roy. 2021. “Closed-Loop Reference Model Based Distributed Model Reference Adaptive Control for Multi-Agent Systems.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 5 (5): 1837–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2020.3045086
  • Goizueta, Norberto, Andrew Wynn, and Rafael Palacios. 2022a. “Adaptive Sampling for Interpolation of Reduced-Order Aeroelastic Systems.” AIAA Journal 60 (11): 6183–6202. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j062050
  • Goizueta, Norberto, Andrew Wynn, Rafael Palacios, Ariel Drachinsky, and Daniella E. Raveh. 2022b. “Flutter Predictions for Very Flexible Wing Wind Tunnel Test.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (4): 1082–97. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036710
  • Golmirzaee, Narges, and David H. Wood. 2026. “Far-Field Boundary Conditions for Airfoil Simulation at High Angle of Attack in Steady, Incompressible, and Two-Dimensional Flow.” Advances in Aerodynamics 8 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-025-00222-7
  • Golombek, H., J. Bustamante, R. Maierl, and I. Staack. 2026. “An Automated Surrogate Model Generation Framework for Rapid Aeroelastic Structural Sizing Optimizations in Conceptual Aircraft Design.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-00996-6
  • Gong, Tianci, Jingjing He, and Xuefei Guan. 2026. “Continuously Nested Moment Quadrature for Uncertainty Quantification of Black-Box Models.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 83: 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2026.103892
  • Gong, Ligang, Qing Wang, and Chaoyang Dong. 2019a. “Disturbance Rejection Control of Morphing Aircraft Based on Switched Nonlinear Systems.” Nonlinear Dynamics 96 (2): 975–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-04834-9
  • Gong, Shengping, Ziqi Xu, Lin Cheng, and Xu Huang. 2024. “Self-Organizing Model Reference Adaptive Control for Aircraft with Enhanced Persistent Excitation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 145: 108875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.108875
  • González, Pedro J., Flávio J. Silvestre, Mateus de Freitas Virgilio Pereira, Zi Yang Pang, and Carlos E. S. Cesnik. 2020. “Loop-Separation Control for Very Flexible Aircraft.” AIAA Journal 58 (9): 3819–34. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058692
  • González-Montijo, Miguel A., Katherine Van Ness, Zack Tully, Richard Wiebe, Brian Polagye, and Michael R. Motley. 2026. “Mechanical Characterization of Bend-Twist Coupling Behavior in Composite Marine Hydro-Kinetic Turbine Blades.” Marine Structures 105: 103924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2025.103924
  • Gorman, D. J., and R. K. Singhal. 1993. “A Superposition-Rayleigh-Ritz Method for Free Vibration Analysis of Non-Uniformly Tensioned Membranes.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 162 (3): 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1993.1135
  • Govoni, Lorenzo, and Andrea Cristofaro. 2023. “Control Allocation for Windup Mitigation in Weakly Redundant Systems with Input Saturation.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 7: 3295–3300. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2023.3324565
  • Grant, Oliver L., Karl A. Stol, Akshya Swain, and Ronald A. Hess. 2015. “Handling Qualities of a Twin Ducted-Fan Aircraft: An Analytical Evaluation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 38 (6): 1126–31. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000826
  • Graves, Michael J., and Adam J. Sawicki. 1994. “The Failure of Integrally Stiffened Graphite/epoxy Cylinders.” Composite Structures 27 (3): 269–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(94)90088-4
  • Gray, Alasdair C., Graeme J. Kennedy, and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2025. “Geometrically Nonlinear High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization for Highly Flexible Wings.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 69 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-025-04181-x
  • Gray, Carl E., and Chuh Mei. 1993. “Large-Amplitude Finite Element Flutter Analysis of Composite Panels in Hypersonic Flow.” AIAA Journal 31 (6): 1090–99. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49051
  • Gray, Alasdair C., Cristina Riso, Eirikur Jonsson, Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, and Carlos E. S. Cesnik. 2023. “High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization with a Geometrically Nonlinear Flutter Constraint.” AIAA Journal 61 (6): 2430–43. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j062127
  • Green, John A. 1987. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of Aft-Swept High-Aspect-Ratio Composite Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 24 (11): 812–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45525
  • Greenhalgh, Skott, Christopher Pastore, and Moishe Garfinkle. 1993. “Aeroelastic Airfoil Smart Spar.” Composites Manufacturing 4 (4): 195–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7143(93)90004-r
  • Grenestedt, Joachim L. 1989. “A Study on the Effect of Bending-Twisting Coupling on Buckling Strength.” Composite Structures 12 (4): 271–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(89)90076-7
  • Griffin, Kenneth E., and Franklin E. Eastep. 1982. “Active Control of Forward-Swept Wings with Divergence and Flutter Aeroelastic Instabilities Kenneth.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (10): 885–91. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61570
  • Grifò, Marco, Vincenzo Gulizzi, Alberto Milazzo, Andrea Da Ronch, and Ivano Benedetti. 2023. “High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Transonic Analysis Using Higher-Order Structural Models.” Composite Structures 321: 117315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117315
  • Grigolyuk, É. I., and G. M. Kulikov. 1990. “Analytical Method for Solving Nonlinear Multilayer Anisotropic Plate Theory Problems.” Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics 31 (2): 281–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00851843
  • Groh, Rainer M. J., and K. C. Wu. 2022. “Nonlinear Buckling and Postbuckling Analysis of Tow-Steered Composite Cylinders with Cutouts.” AIAA Journal 60 (9): 5533–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j061755
  • Gross, Kerianne H., Matthew A. Clark, Jonathan A. Hoffman, Eric D. Swenson, and Aaron W. Fifarek. 2017. “Run-Time Assurance and Formal Methods Analysis Nonlinear System Applied to Nonlinear System Control.” Journal of Aerospace Information Systems 14 (4): 232–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.i010471
  • Gruenwald, Benjamin C., Tansel Yucelen, and Animesh Chakravarthy. 2020. “Adaptive Control of Unactuated Dynamical Systems through Interconnections: Stability and Performance Guarantees.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 34 (4): 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3095
  • Gu, Xin, Huu Duc Vo, Njuki W. Mureithi, and Eric Laurendeau. 2023. “Plasma Gurney Flap Flight Control at Low Angle of Attack.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (1): 172–89. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036702
  • Gu, Huaiyuan, Javad Taghipour, Alexander D. Shaw, et al. 2022. “Tailored Twist Morphing Achieved Using Graded Bend–twist Metamaterials.” Composite Structures 300: 116151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116151
  • Gu, Wenjing, and Li Zhou. 2020. “Flutter Onset Prediction Based on Parametric Model Estimation.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (6): 1026–43. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035833
  • Gu, Wenjing, and Li Zhou. 2022. “Flutter Boundary Prediction in a Global Stochastic Framework.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (4): 836–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036508
  • Guderley, Gottfried. 1956. “On Transonic Airfoil Theory.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 23 (10): 961–69. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.3697
  • Guimarães, Thiago A. M., Saullo G. P. Castro, Carlos E. S. Cesnik, and Domingos A. Rade. 2019. “Supersonic Flutter and Buckling Optimization of Tow-Steered Composite Plates.” AIAA Journal 57 (1): 397–407. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j057282
  • Guimarães, Thiago A. M., Higor L. Silva, Domingos A. Rade, and Carlos E. S. Cesnik. 2020. “Aeroelastic Stability of Conventional and Tow-Steered Composite Plates under Stochastic Fiber Volume.” AIAA Journal 58 (6): 2748–59. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j059106
  • Gunnink, J. W. 1988. “Damage Tolerance and Supportability Aspects of ARALL Laminate Aircraft Structures.” Composite Structures 10 (1): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(88)90062-1
  • Guo, Tianhao, Zhongxi Hou, and Bingjie Zhu. 2017a. “Dynamic Modeling and Active Morphing Trajectory-Attitude Separation Control Approach for Gull-Wing Aircraft.” IEEE Access 5: 17006–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2743059
  • Guo, S., Z. W. Jing, H. Li, W. T. Lei, and Y. Y. He. 2017b. “Gust Response and Body Freedom Flutter of a Flying-Wing Aircraft with a Passive Gust Alleviation Device.” Aerospace Science and Technology 70: 277–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.08.008
  • Guo, Jingrui, Yi Li, Min Xu, Xiaomin An, and Guangning Li. 2021. “Aero-Structural Optimization of Supersonic Wing under Thermal Environment Using Adjoint-Based Optimization Algorithm.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 64 (1): 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02888-1
  • Guo, Lianyu, Shiqian Liu, Weizhi Lyu, Qian Zhang, and Yunxin Meng. 2026. “L1 Adaptive Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Based Automatic Landing Control of Civil Aircraft.” Aerospace Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-026-00489-8
  • Guo, Xiangying, Zhen Wang, Kuan Lu, and Dongxing Cao. 2025. “Design and Aerodynamic Analysis of a Morphing Joined-Wing Aircraft with Transonic Flight Capability.” Aerospace Science and Technology 159: 109966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.109966
  • Guo, An, Zhou Zhou, Xiaoping Zhu, Xin Zhao, and Yuxin Ding. 2020. “Automatic Control and Model Verification for a Small Aileron-Less Hand-Launched Solar-Powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” Electronics 9 (2): 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9020364
  • Gupta, K. K., M. J. Brenner, and L. S. Voelker. 1989. “Integrated Aeroservoelastic Analysis Capability with X-29A Comparisons.” Journal of Aircraft 26. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890036940
  • Guruswamy, Guru. 2019. “Active Control of Supersonic Transport Aeroelastic Oscillations Using High-Fidelity Equations.” IFAC Journal of Systems and Control 8: 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacsc.2019.100057
  • Guruswamy, Guru P., Peter M. Goorjian, and Eugene L. Tu. 1987. “Transonic Aeroelasticity of Wings with Tip Stores.” Journal of Aircraft 24 (10): 688–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45508
  • Guruswamy, Guru P., and Eugene L. Tu. 1989. “Transonic Aeroelasticity of Fighter Wings with Active Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (7): 682–84. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45820
  • Gwin, L. B. 1976. “Optimal Aeroelastic Design of an Oblique Wing Structure.” Journal of Aircraft 13 (5): 364–68. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58668
  • Haas, David J., and Inderjit Chopra. 1988. “Static Aeroelastic Characteristics of Circulation Control Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (10): 948–54. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45684
  • Haas, David J., and Inderjit Chopra. 1990. “Aeroelastic Stability of Aircraft with Circulation Control Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 27 (9): 771–78. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45937
  • Had, Jiří, and Milan Růžička. 2016. “Computational Analysis of Damage in Hybrid Composite Structure.” Composite Structures 135: 109–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.009
  • Hadidoolabi, M., and H. Ansarian. 2018. “Computational Investigation of Vortex Structure and Breakdown over a Delta Wing at Supersonic Pitching Maneuver.” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 40 (2): 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1021-z
  • Haeri, Ali, and Mohammad Javad Fadaee. 2016. “Efficient Reliability Analysis of Laminated Composites Using Advanced Kriging Surrogate Model.” Composite Structures 149: 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.013
  • Haftka, Raphael T. 1977. “Optimization of Flexible Wing Structures Subject to Strength and Induced Drag Constraints.” AIAA Journal 15 (8): 1101–6. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7400
  • Hagnell, M. K., B. Langbeck, and M. Åkermo. 2016. “Cost Efficiency, Integration and Assembly of a Generic Composite Aeronautical Wing Box.” Composite Structures 152: 1014–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.032
  • Hahn, Daniel, and Matthias Haupt. 2022. “Exploration of the Effect of Wing Component Post-Buckling on Bending-Twist Coupling for Nonlinear Wing Twist.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 13 (3): 663–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-022-00586-2
  • Halder, R., M. Damodaran, and B. C. Khoo. 2020a. “Deep Learning Based Reduced Order Model for Airfoil-Gust and Aeroelastic Interaction.” AIAA Journal 58 (10): 4304–21. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j059027
  • Halder, Kaushik, Saptarshi Das, and Amitava Gupta. 2020b. “Time Delay Handling in Dominant Pole Placement with PID Controllers to Obtain Stability Regions Using Random Sampling.” International Journal of Control 94 (12): 3384–3405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2020.1764110
  • Haley, Pamela, and Don Soloway. 2022. “Generalized Predictive Control for Active Flutter Suppression [25 Years Ago].” IEEE Control Systems 42 (4): 13-C3. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcs.2022.3171473
  • Hall, G. Warren. 1971. “An in-Flight Investigation of Bank-Angle Control Parameters for Cruising Flight.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (5): 341–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59106
  • Hall, G. Warren, Norman C. Weingarten, and Jerry L. Lockenou. 1974. “Handling Qualities Effects on Precision Weapons Delivery.” Journal of Aircraft 11 (9): 497–98. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60377
  • Hamada, Yoshiro, Kenichi Saitoh, and Noboru Kobiki. 2019. “Gust Alleviation Control Using Prior Gust Information: Wind Tunnel Test Results.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (12): 128–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.125
  • Hamissi, A., Y. Bouzid, N. Dabouze, M. Zaouche, K. Busawon, and M. Hamerain. 2019. “Combining Homogeneous High Order Sliding Mode and Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Fixed Wing Aircraft Attitude and Speed Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (12): 304–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.260
  • Han, Haoran, Jian Cheng, Zhilong Xi, and Maolong Lv. 2023. “Symmetric Actor–critic Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cascade Quadrotor Flight Control.” Neurocomputing 559: 126789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126789
  • Han, Xiaojia, and Chao Pei. 2026. “Safety Assessment and Fault Tolerance in eVTOL Aircraft Flight Control System: Current Status and Challenges.” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine 41 (4): 128–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/maes.2025.3566023
  • Han, Yanqiao, Menglong Yang, Yang Ren, and Weizheng Li. 2024. “Large Language Model Guided Reinforcement Learning Based Six-Degree-of-Freedom Flight Control.” IEEE Access 12: 89479–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3411015
  • Hanazaki, Kyohei, and Wataru Yamazaki. 2024. “Robust Design Optimization of Supersonic Biplane Airfoil Using Efficient Uncertainty Analysis Method for Discontinuous Problem.” Aerospace 11 (1): 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11010064
  • Hancock, G. J. 1971. “Comment on ‘ Span Wise Distribution of Induced Drag in Subsonic Flow by the Vortex Lattice Method’.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (8): 681–681. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59157
  • Hanman, Paul, Yufeng Yao, and Abdessalem Bouferrouk. 2025. “Transonic Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of a CRM Joined-Wing Configuration.” Fluids 10 (2): 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020027
  • Hansen, John H., Molong Duan, Ilya V. Kolmanovsky, and Carlos E. S. Cesnik. 2022. “Load Alleviation of Flexible Aircraft by Dynamic Control Allocation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (10): 1890–98. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006577
  • Hanson, Gregory D., and Robert F. Stengel. 1984. “Effects of Displacement and Rate Saturation on the Control of Statically Unstable Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 7 (2): 197–205. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8567
  • Hao, Ying, Chao Ma, and Yuda Hu. 2023. “Nonlinear Stochastic Flutter Analysis of a Three-Degree-of-Freedom Wing in a Two-Dimensional Flow Field under Stochastic Perturbations.” Aerospace Science and Technology 138: 108323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108323
  • Hao, Ying, Xinmiao Yu, and Zhiqiang Wu. 2026. “Parametric Influences on the Hypersonic Two-Degree-of-Freedom Wing Flutter Response to Longitudinal Stochastic Disturbances.” Thin-Walled Structures 225: 114867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2026.114867
  • Harpur, N. F. 1968. “Concorde Structural Development.” Journal of Aircraft 5 (2): 176–83. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43926
  • He, Qizhi, Yi Tan, Xiaoxiong Liu, Qianlei Jia, and Jinglong Liu. 2020. “Reconfigurable Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Attitude Control of a Structurally Damaged Aircraft.” IEEE Access 8: 199931–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3035436
  • He, Yajuan, Junli Wang, Jinyang Li, Bofeng Duan, Yang Zhou, and Kangjie Wang. 2023. “Effect of Aeroelastic Tailoring Design on Wing Mode.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2023: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1711088
  • Heersink, Byron, Pape Sylla, and Michael A. Warren. 2022. “Formal Verification of Octorotor Flight Envelope Using Barrier Functions and Satisfiability Modulo Theories Solving.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 6: 1507–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2021.3119258
  • Heinrich, Gian-Andrea, Stephanie Vogt, Nicholas R. J. Lawrance, Thomas J. Stastny, and Roland Y. Siegwart. 2022. “In-Wing Pressure Measurements for Airspeed and Airflow Angle Estimation and High Angle-of-Attack Flight.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (6): 1033–45. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006412
  • Hemsch, M. J. 1989. “Similarity for High-Angle-of-Attack Subsonic/transonic Slender-Body Aerodynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (1): 56–66. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45723
  • Hemsch, M. J., and J. N. Nielsen. 1983. “Equivalent Angle-of-Attack Method for Estimating Nonlinear Aerodynamics of Missile Fins.” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 20 (4): 356–62. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25606
  • Henschel, F., and S. Chetty. 1989. “Flight Control System Design for an in-Flight Simulator.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 12 (3): 351–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20415
  • Hermanutz, Andreas, and Mirko Hornung. 2020. “Aeroelastic Wing Planform Design Optimization of a Flutter UAV Demonstrator.” Aerospace 7 (4): 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7040045
  • Herrmann, Avriel A., and Joseph Z. Ben-Asher. 2016. “Flight Control Law Clearance Using Optimal Control Theory.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (2): 515–29. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033517
  • Hess, Ronald A. 1984. “Analysis of Aircraft Attitude Control Systems Prone to Pilot-Induced Oscillations.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 7 (1): 106–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56363
  • Hess, Ronald A. 1989. “Theory for Aircraft Handling Qualities Based upon a Structural Pilotmodel.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 12 (6): 792–97. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20483
  • Hess, R. A. 1991. “Analysing Manipulator and Feel System Effects in Aircraft Flight Control.” Applied Ergonomics 22 (6): 420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(91)90114-w
  • Hess, Ronald A. 2016. ““Fast Simulation” in Evaluating Pilot/Aircraft Performance and Handling Qualities.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (32): 153–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.206
  • Hess, Ronald A. 2018. “Providing Flight-Path Control Bandwidth for Carrier Landings.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (1): 406–9. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034596
  • Hess, Ronald A., and Cheng Peng. 2018. “Design for Robust Aircraft Flight Control.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (2): 875–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034497
  • Hess, Robert W., David A. Seidel, William B. Igoe, and Pierce L. Lawing. 1989. “Transonic Unsteady Pressure Measurements on a Supercritical Airfoil at High Reynolds Numbers.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (7): 605–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45810
  • Hess, Ronald A., and Iwan Sunyoto. 1985. “Toward a Unifying Theory for Aircraft Handling Qualities.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 8 (4): 440–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20003
  • Higgins, H. C., and H. A. Shomber. 1965. “Effect of Variable Sweep on Supersonic Transport Handling Qualities.” Journal of Aircraft 2 (6): 465–69. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43684
  • Hilger, Jonathan, and Markus Raimund Ritter. 2021. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Simulations and Stability Analysis of the Pazy Wing Aeroelastic Benchmark.” Aerospace 8 (10): 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8100308
  • Hinchliffe, Benjamin, and Ning Qin. 2017. “Using Surface Sensitivity from Mesh Adjoint for Transonic Wing Drag Reduction.” AIAA Journal 55 (3): 818–31. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j055319
  • Hirai, K., and Y. Satoh. 1980. “Stability of a System with Variable Time Delay.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 25 (3): 552–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1980.1102355
  • Hirato, Yoshikazu, Minao Shen, Ashok Gopalarathnam, and Jack R. Edwards. 2019. “Vortex-Sheet Representation of Leading-Edge Vortex Shedding from Finite Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (4): 1626–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035124
  • Hirsch, D. L., and R. L. McCORMICK. 1966. “Experimental Investigation of Pilot Dynamics in a Pilot-Induced Oscillation Situation.” Journal of Aircraft 3 (6): 567–73. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43778
  • Hisada, Shinsaku, Shu Minakuchi, and Nobuo Takeda. 2020. “Damage Tolerance Improvement of Composite T-Joint under Pull-up Conditions Using an Interlocking-Fiber-Based Crack Arrester.” Composite Structures 253: 112792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112792
  • Hitch, H. P. Y. 1978. “Comment on ‘Aeroelastic Stability Characteristics of an Oblique-Wing Aircraft’.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (12): 0864a-0864a. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58464
  • Hitzel, Stephan. 2017. “High-Angle-of-Attack F-16XL Flight Simulations at Sub- and Transonic Speeds.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (6): 2014–26. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034025
  • Hitzel, Stephan Maria, and Robert Osterhuber. 2018. “Enhanced Maneuverability of a Delta-Canard Combat Aircraft by Vortex Flow Control.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (3): 1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034473
  • Hobbs, Kerianne L., Mark L. Mote, Matthew C. L. Abate, Samuel D. Coogan, and Eric M. Feron. 2023. “Runtime Assurance for Safety-Critical Systems: An Introduction to Safety Filtering Approaches for Complex Control Systems.” IEEE Control Systems 43 (2): 28–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcs.2023.3234380
  • Hodgins, Lucy, and Chris T. Freeman. 2025. “Robust Iterative Learning Control for Unstable MIMO Systems.” International Journal of Control 99 (2): 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2025.2513674
  • Hollowell, Steven J., and John Dugundji. 1984. “Aeroelastic Flutter and Divergence of Stiffness Coupled, Graphite/epoxy Cantilevered Plates.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (1): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48224
  • Holst, Terry L., and David Brown. 1983. “Transonic Airfoil Calculations Using Solution-Adaptive Grids.” AIAA Journal 21 (2): 304–6. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8069
  • “Honeycomb-Laminate Composite Structure.” 1979. Composites 10 (1): 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(79)90475-0
  • Hong, C. S., and S. K. Cheong. 1993. “Analysis of an Anisotropic Composite Laminate with a Part-through Cracks.” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 46 (4): 683–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(93)90174-q
  • Hongyan, Zhang, and Guo Xiaoyong. 2026. “Nonlinear Precise Tracking and Regulation for Unmanned Aircraft Flight Control.” IEEE Access 14: 74576–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3692889
  • Hoogervorst, Jan E. K., and Ali Elham. 2017. “Wing Aerostructural Optimization Using the Individual Discipline Feasible Architecture.” Aerospace Science and Technology 65: 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.02.012
  • Hope, Dylan N., and Donald L. Kunz. 2019. “Investigation of Shock Motion in Transonic Flow Using an Oscillating, Straked, Delta Wing.” AIAA Journal 57 (10): 4406–15. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j057456
  • Hopwood, Jeremy W., James L. Gresham, and Craig A. Woolsey. 2023. “Robust Stall Spin Flight Path Control with Flight Test Validation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 46 (3): 553–59. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007016
  • Hoseini, Hanif S., and Dewey H. Hodges. 2019. “Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Damaged High-Aspect-Ratio Composite Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (5): 1794–1808. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035098
  • Howard, Richard M., and John F. O’Leary. 1994. “Flowfield Study of a Close-Coupled Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (4): 908–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46578
  • Hozić, Dženan, Carl-Johan Thore, Christopher Cameron, and Mohamed Loukil. 2023. “Deterministic-Based Robust Design Optimization of Composite Structures under Material Uncertainty.” Composite Structures 322: 117336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117336
  • Hu, Hai-Chang. 1984. “Derivation of the Classical Plate Bending Theory from Elasticity by Variational Method.” Computers & Structures 19 (1–2): 71–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(84)90204-9
  • Hu, Fuwen. 2022. “Digital Twin-Driven Reconfigurable Fixturing Optimization for Trimming Operation of Aircraft Skins.” Aerospace 9 (3): 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9030154
  • Hu, Wei, Zhichun Yang, and Yingsong Gu. 2016. “Aeroelastic Study for Folding Wing during the Morphing Process.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 365: 216–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.043
  • Hua, Siyu, Xugang Wang, and Zhongyuan Wang. 2025. “Rigid–Elastic Coupling Dynamics of Morphing Wing Aircraft.” Aerospace 12 (4): 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12040327
  • Huang, Zi, Linkai Li, Yunsong Gu, Yu Lei, Zongyuan Zhang, and Zhenjun Peng. 2026. “On-Board Flow Sensing for Forebody Vortex-Induced Yaw at High Angle of Attack.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038842
  • Huang, Yan, Zhe Wang, and Puhui Chen. 2024a. “Buckling Optimization of Variable Stiffness Composite Wing Boxes with Manufacturing Defects.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 67 (7): 109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-024-03809-8
  • Huang, Guanxin, Hu Wang, and Guangyao Li. 2016. “An Efficient Reanalysis Assisted Optimization for Variable-Stiffness Composite Design by Using Path Functions.” Composite Structures 153: 409–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.043
  • Huang, Chao, Chao Yang, Zhigang Wu, and Changhong Tang. 2018. “Variations of Flutter Mechanism of a Span-Morphing Wing Involving Rigid-Body Motions.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 31 (3): 490–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.12.014
  • Huang, Rui, Zhijun Yang, Xiangjie Yao, Yonghui Zhao, and Haiyan Hu. 2019. “Parameterized Modeling Methodology for Efficient Aeroservoelastic Analysis of a Morphing Wing.” AIAA Journal 57 (12): 5543–52. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058211
  • Huang, Rui, Xuehao Yu, and Xinhua Zhou. 2022. “Efficient Nonlinear Aeroservoelastic Modeling for Morphing Wing with Bilinear Stiffness.” AIAA Journal 60 (5): 3135–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j060923
  • Huang, Linbin, Jianzhe Zhen, John Lygeros, and Florian Dörfler. 2023. “Robust Data-Enabled Predictive Control: Tractable Formulations and Performance Guarantees.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 68 (5): 3163–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2023.3241282
  • Huang, Chengde, Guannan Zheng, Xueyuan Nie, and Guowei Yang. 2024b. “Supercritical and Subcritical Aeroelastic Behaviors of a Three-Dimensional Wing Coupled with a Nonlinear Energy Sink.” International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 161: 104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.104692
  • Hübener, Dominik, and Robert Luckner. 2026. “Effectiveness and Robustness of an Independent Flight Control Law Monitor.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 17 (3): 1465–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00930-2
  • Hübler, M., S. Nissle, M. Gurka, and U. Breuer. 2016. “Fiber-Reinforced Polymers with Integrated Shape Memory Alloy Actuation: An Innovative Actuation Method for Aerodynamic Applications.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 7 (4): 567–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-016-0209-0
  • Hui, David. 1986. “Imperfection Sensitivity of Axially Compressed Laminated Flat Plates Due to Bending-Stretching Coupling.” International Journal of Solids and Structures 22 (1): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(86)90100-9
  • Hummel, D., and H.-Chr. Oelker. 1994. “Low-Speed Characteristics for the Wing-Canard Configuration of the International Vortex Flow Experiment.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (4): 868–78. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46573
  • Humphreys-Jennings, Clayton, Ilias Lappas, and Dragos Mihai Sovar. 2020. “Conceptual Design, Flying, and Handling Qualities Assessment of a Blended Wing Body (BWB) Aircraft by Using an Engineering Flight Simulator.” Aerospace 7 (5): 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7050051
  • Hurley, F. X. 1975. “Measured Three-Dimensional Effects in Transonic Airfoil Testing.” AIAA Journal 13 (2): 250–52. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49684
  • Hwu, Chyanbin, and Z. S. Tsai. 2002. “Aeroelastic Divergence of Stiffened Composite Multicell Wing Structures.” Journal of Aircraft 39 (2): 242–51. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2945
  • “A Hybrid Adaptive Control Scheme Using Sampled Data and Intersampling Compensation.” 1995. Control Engineering Practice 3 (1): 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(95)90150-7
  • “Hybrid Composite Laminate Structures.” 1978. Composites 9 (3): 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(78)90462-7
  • Iannelli, Andrea, Andrés Marcos, and Mark Lowenberg. 2017. “Aeroelastic Modeling and Stability Analysis: A Robust Approach to the Flutter Problem.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 28 (1): 342–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3878
  • Iannelli, Andrea, Andrés Marcos, and Mark Lowenberg. 2018. “Study of Flexible Aircraft Body Freedom Flutter with Robustness Tools.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 41 (5): 1083–94. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003165
  • Ignatyev, Dmitry, and Alexander Khrabrov. 2018. “Experimental Study and Neural Network Modeling of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Canard Aircraft at High Angles of Attack.” Aerospace 5 (1): 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5010026
  • Ijaz, Salman, Mirza Tariq Hamayun, Haris Anwaar, Lin Yan, and Ming Kuo Li. 2019b. “LPV Modeling and Tracking Control of Dissimilar Redundant Actuation System for Civil Aircraft.” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 17 (3): 705–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-017-0399-1
  • “Interlaminar Shear Fracture of Interleaved Graphite/epoxy Composite Materials.” 1992. Composites 23 (4): 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(92)90207-b
  • Invernizzi, Davide, and Marco Lovera. 2018. “Trajectory Tracking Control of Thrust-Vectoring UAVs.” Automatica 95: 180–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2018.05.024
  • Iovnovich, Michael, Tzlil Nahom, Michael Presman, Dorin Avsaid, Tomer Braier, and Daniella E. Raveh. 2018. “Assessment of Advanced Flutter Flight-Test Techniques and Flutter Boundary Prediction Methods.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (5): 1877–89. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034716
  • Ishii, Koji. 2023. “Multihop Networked Control System Considering Communication Delay and Link Reliability.” IEICE Communications Express 12 (3): 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1587/comex.2022xbl0174
  • Isogai, Koji. 1979. “On the Transonic-Dip Mechanism of Flutter of a Sweptback Wing.” AIAA Journal 17 (7): 793–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61226
  • Isogai, Koji. 1981. “Transonic Dip Mechanism of Flutter of a Sweptback Wing. II.” AIAA Journal 19 (9): 1240–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7853
  • Isogai, Koji. 1989. “Direct Search Method to Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Composite Wing under Multiple Constraints.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (12): 1076–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45883
  • Isogai, K. 1992. “Transonic Flutter/divergence Characteristics of Aeroelastically Tailored and Non-Tailored High-Aspect-Ratio Forward-Swept Wings.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 6 (5): 525–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-9746(92)90017-w
  • Jackuliak, Jakub, and Martin Bugaj. 2026. “Challenges of High-Speed UAV Using Forward Swept Wing.” In 2026 New Trends in Civil Aviation (NTCA). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/ntca68808.2026.11524172
  • Jacobson, Ira D., and Dinesh S. Joshi. 1977. “Investigation of the Influence of Simulated Turbulence on Handling Qualities.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (3): 272–75. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44591
  • Jacobson, Ira D., and Dinesh S. Joshi. 1978. “Handling Qualities of Aircraft in the Presence of Simulated Turbulence.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (4): 254–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58351
  • Jacome, Luis Bahamonde, and Ali Elham. 2018. “Wing Aerostructural Optimization with an Analytical Fuel Consumption Sensitivity Model.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 10 (3): 719–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0342-z
  • Jagana, Jnana Sai, Sreekanth Rajagopalan, Satyajith Amaran, and Qi Zhang. 2026. “Design for Flexibility: An Adjustable Robust Optimization Approach with Decision-Dependent Uncertainty.” AIChE Journal 72 (4): e70222. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.70222
  • Jajarmi, Amin, and Mojtaba Hajipour. 2016. “An Efficient Finite Difference Method for the Time-Delay Optimal Control Problems with Time-Varying Delay.” Asian Journal of Control 19 (2): 554–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1371
  • Jalalnezhad, Mostafa. 2026. “Active Vibration Control and Optimized Flutter Suppression in Missile Tail Structures Using Piezoelectric Layers.” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 48 (5): 337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-025-06274-6
  • Jang, Jun-Hwan, and Sang-Ho Ahn. 2022. “Optimum Design of UAV Wing Skin Structure with a High Aspect Ratio Using Variable Laminate Stiffness.” Applied Sciences 12 (19): 9436. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199436
  • Jategaonkar, R. V., and F. Thielecke. 1994. “Evaluation of Parameter Estimation Methods for Unstable Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (3): 510–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46523
  • Jelovica, Jasmin, and Yuecheng Cai. 2022. “Improved Multi-Objective Structural Optimization with Adaptive Repair-Based Constraint Handling.” Engineering Optimization 56 (1): 118–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2022.2147518
  • Jensen, D. W., and E. F. Crawley. 1984. “Frequency Determination Techniques for Cantilevered Plates with Bending-Torsion Coupling.” AIAA Journal 22 (3): 415–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48463
  • Jeon, Youngjae, Geomji Choi, Kwanghyun Ahn, Kang-Heon Lee, and Seongmin Chang. 2025. “Frequency-Based Finite Element Updating Method for Physics-Based Digital Twin.” Mathematics 13 (5): 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13050738
  • Jeong, Hoijo, Jinyoung Suk, and Seungkeun Kim. 2024. “Hybrid Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion-Based Control of UAV in Urban Wind Environment.” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 22 (12): 3653–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-024-0539-3
  • Jewell, Wayne F., Robert K. Heffley, Warren F. Clement, and Thomas C. West. 1979. “Powered-Lift Aircraft Handling Qualities in the Presence of Atmospheric Disturbances.” Journal of Aircraft 16 (6): 388–92. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58536
  • Jeyachandrabose, C., and J. Kirkhope. 1985. “Explicit Formulation for a High Precision Triangular Laminated Anisotropic Thin Plate Finite Element.” Computers & Structures 20 (6): 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(85)90018-5
  • Ji, Yuehui, Zhaotao Ke, Yu Song, Qiang Gao, and Junjie Liu. 2024a. “Predefined Time Formation Control for Glide Multiple Aircraft under Event-Triggered Mechanism.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 38 (10): 3381–3400. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3880
  • Ji, Chang-ho, Chong-sup Kim, and Byoung-Soo Kim. 2021a. “A Hybrid Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for Improving Flying Qualities of Asymmetric Store Configuration Aircraft.” Aerospace 8 (5): 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8050126
  • Ji, Chang-ho, Chongsup Kim, and Byoung Soo Kim. 2023. “Flight Control Law for Stabilizing Transient Response of the Aircraft during Gun Firing.” Aerospace 10 (4): 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10040365
  • Ji, Honglei, Linghai Lu, Mark D. White, and Renliang Chen. 2022. “Advanced Pilot Modeling for Prediction of Rotorcraft Handling Qualities in Turbulent Wind.” Aerospace Science and Technology 123: 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107501
  • Ji, Xinze, Tihao Yang, Yayun Shi, Yuhang Ma, and Junqiang Bai. 2025. “D-Optimal Polynomial Chaos Expansion for Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Robust Optimization in Transonic Flows.” Aerospace Science and Technology 167: 110659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110659
  • Ji, Xiaowen, Yan-Gang Zhao, and Zhao-Hui Lu. 2021b. “Uncertainty Analysis of Bridge Flutter Considering Dependence and Sampling Error in Flutter Derivative Measurements.” Engineering Structures 246: 113051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113051
  • Jia, Baoxu, Liguo Sun, Xiaoyu Liu, Shuting Xu, Wenqian Tan, and Junkai Jiao. 2023. “Carrier Aircraft Flight Controller Design by Synthesizing Preview and Nonlinear Control Laws.” Drones 7 (3): 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7030200
  • Jiang, Yun, Daochun Li, Zi Kan, Bohao Dong, Chong Zhen, and Jinwu Xiang. 2024a. “Bifurcation Analysis of Wing Rock and Routes to Chaos of a Low Aspect Ratio Flying Wing.” Nonlinear Dynamics 112 (23): 21491–21508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10134-8
  • Jiang, Weihong, Ming Li, Yongtao Yao, and Fuhong Dai. 2018a. “Design of a Multistable Composite Laminate by Variable Cross-Section Method and Applying the Displacement Constraint.” Materials & Design 147: 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.028
  • Jiang, Feihong, Xiaoxiong Liu, Tongwen Chen, and Kecheng Li. 2024b. “Research on an Ice Tolerance Control Method for Large Aircraft Based on Adaptive Dynamic Inversion.” Actuators 13 (6): 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/act13060227
  • Jiang, Runpei, Yun Tian, and Peiqing Liu. 2019. “Transonic Buffet Control by Rearward Buffet Breather on Supercritical Airfoil and Wing.” Aerospace Science and Technology 89: 204–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.043
  • Jiang, Kun, Wei Zhang, XiaoWu Xu, and Zhi Ma. 2011. “Investigation of Dynamic Characteristic of Forward Swept Folding Wing.” In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics (ICAL). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ical.2011.6024717
  • Jin, Wang, Song Bifeng, Wang Liguang, and Tang Wei. 2015. “L1 Adaptive Dynamic Inversion Controller for an X-Wing Tail-Sitter MAV in Hover Flight.” Procedia Engineering 99: 969–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.629
  • Jin, Fusong, and Jianghong Xue. 2026. “Reduced-Order Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis and Lyapunov-Based Chaos Characterization of SMA Hybrid Composite Actuator Beams under Thermo-Aeroelastic Excitation.” Actuators 15 (6): 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/act15060337
  • Jing, Zhao, Lei Duan, and Biao Li. 2023. “Variable Stiffness Optimization Algorithm for Vibration Optimization of Variable-Stiffness Composite Plates.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 116: 569–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2022.12.003
  • Jing, Zhao, Lei Duan, Siqi Wang, and Biao Li. 2024. “Buckling Optimization of Variable-Stiffness Composite Plates via Variable Stiffness Optimization Algorithm.” Composite Structures 327: 117657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117657
  • Jing, Zhao, Xu Li, Qin Sun, Ke Liang, Yongjie Zhang, and Lei Duan. 2022. “A 2D-Sampling Optimization Method for Buckling Layup Design of Doubly-Curved Laminated Composite Shallow Shells.” Composite Structures 297: 115934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115934
  • Jing, Hung-Sying, and Kuan-Goang Tzeng. 1995. “Elasticity Solution for Laminated Anisotropic Cylindrical Panels in Cylindrical Bending.” Composite Structures 30 (3): 307–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(94)00045-x
  • Jo, Bruce W., and Tuba Majid. 2023. “Enhanced Range and Endurance Evaluation of a Camber Morphing Wing Aircraft.” Biomimetics 8 (1): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010034
  • Johari, H., D. J. Olinger, and K. C. Fitzpatrick. 1995. “Delta Wing Vortex Control via Recessed Angled Spanwise Blowing.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (4): 804–10. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46794
  • Johnson, A. F. 1973. “Bending and Torsion of Anisotropic Beams.” International Journal of Solids and Structures 9 (4): 527–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(73)90068-1
  • Johnson, A. E., J. Henderson, and B. Khan. 1962. “Creep of a Solid Metallic Bar or Thick-Walled Tube of Circular Section, at Elevated Temperatures, When Subject to Various Combinations of Uniform Bending Moment, Torque and Axial Load.” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 4 (3): 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7403(62)80002-2
  • Jones, R. T. 1976. “Aeroelastic Stability and Control of an Oblique Wing: Wind Tunnel Experiments.” Journal of Aircraft 13 (10): 832–832. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58717
  • Jones, R., W. Broughton, R. F. Mousley, and R. T. Potter. 1985. “Compression Failures of Damaged Graphite Epoxy Laminates.” Composite Structures 3 (2): 167–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(85)90042-x
  • Jones, Natasha R., and Jerome P. Jarrett. 2018. “Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model.” AIAA Journal 56 (12): 4801–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j056725
  • Jonnalagadda, A. K., A. S. Sawant, S. E. Rohde, B. V. Sankar, and P. G. Ifju. 2015. “An Analytical Model for Composite Tubes with Bend–twist Coupling.” Composite Structures 131: 578–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.023
  • Jonsson, Eirikur, Cristina Riso, Bernardo Bahia Monteiro, Alasdair C. Gray, Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, and Carlos E. S. Cesnik. 2023. “High-Fidelity Gradient-Based Wing Structural Optimization Including Geometrically Nonlinear Flutter Constraint.” AIAA Journal 61 (7): 3045–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j061575
  • Joshi, Vivek, Sahil Kalra, and P. V. S. Murthy. 2026. “Aerodynamic Superiority of Trailing-Edge Morphing over Hinged Flaps in S1223 Airfoils at Different Morphing Lengths.” Aerospace Science and Technology 177: 112927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.112927
  • Juhasz, Ondrej, Mark B. Tischler, and Roberto Celi. 2023. “Comparison of Linear Flexible Aircraft Model Structures on Large Flexible Tiltrotor Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (5): 1601–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037085
  • Kabashkin, Igor. 2024. “Digital Twin Framework for Aircraft Lifecycle Management Based on Data-Driven Models.” Mathematics 12 (19): 2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12192979
  • Kaczmarek, Sylvester. 2026. “A Neuromorphic Safety Monitor for Verifiable Runtime Assurance in Stochastic Control Loops.” Neurocomputing 680: 133215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2026.133215
  • Kafkas, Angelos, Spyridon Kilimtzidis, Athanasios Kotzakolios, Vassilis Kostopoulos, and George Lampeas. 2021. “Multi-Fidelity Optimization of a Composite Airliner Wing Subject to Structural and Aeroelastic Constraints.” Aerospace 8 (12): 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8120398
  • Kai, Jean-Marie. 2024. “Full-Envelope Flight Control for Compound Vertical Takeoff and Landing Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (8): 1569–85. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007917
  • Kakkar, Samarth, Thomas Streit, Arne Seitz, and Rolf Radespiel. 2026. “Bayesian Forward Design Methodology for Laminar Transonic Airfoils with Cross Flow Attenuation at Large Sweep Angles.” Aerospace 13 (2): 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13020171
  • Kalam, M. A. 1981. “Modified Rayleigh-Ritz Method in Nonaxisymmetric Thermoelastic Analysis of an Orthotropic Cylinder.” Journal of Thermal Stresses 4 (1): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495738108909950
  • Kalam, Sd. Abdul, T. Seshaiah, and K. Srividya. 2022. “Damage Behaviour and Failure Response of Aircraft Composite Structure by Soft Body Impact.” Materials Today: Proceedings 52: 867–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.271
  • Kalms, Michael, and Ralf B. Bergmann. 2020. “Structure Function Analysis of Powder Beds in Additive Manufacturing by Laser Beam Melting.” Additive Manufacturing 36: 101396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101396
  • Kaloerov, S. A. 1983. “Elasticity Theory Problem for a Multiconnected Anisotropic Plate with Holes and Internal Cracks.” Soviet Applied Mechanics 19 (9): 801–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00883204
  • Kambampati, Sandilya, and Edward C. Smith. 2017. “Aeroelastic Optimization of High-Speed Tiltrotor Wings with Wing Extensions and Winglets.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (5): 1718–27. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034195
  • Kambampati, Sandilya, Scott Townsend, and H. Alicia Kim. 2020. “Coupled Aerostructural Level Set Topology Optimization of Aircraft Wing Boxes.” AIAA Journal 58 (8): 3614–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j059157
  • Kanazaki, Masahiro, and Nao Setoguchi. 2023. “Characteristics of Vortices around Forward Swept Wing at Low Speeds/High Angles of Attack.” Aerospace 10 (9): 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10090790
  • Kandasamy, S., Nandan K. Sinha, and J. Umakanth. 2018. “Parametric Optimization of High Aspect Ratio Wing Using Surrogate Model.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (1): 231–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.05.052
  • Kano, Ryosuke, Kazuki Ryuzono, Shugo Date, Yoshiaki Abe, and Tomonaga Okabe. 2025. “Structural Optimization of Composite Aircraft Wing Considering Fluid–structure Interaction and Damage Tolerance Assessment Using Continuum Damage Mechanics.” Aerospace Science and Technology 167: 110652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110652
  • Kanou, Kento, and Tatsuya Ibuki. 2025. “Recursive Gaussian Process-Based Safety Assurance Exploration Control in Unknown Environments.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 9: 2951–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2025.3647557
  • Kapania, Rakesh K., Frederick D’Oench Bergen, and Jean-Francois M. Barthelemy. 1991. “Shape Sensitivity Analysis of Flutter Response of a Laminated Wing.” AIAA Journal 29 (4): 611–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59930
  • Kapania, Rakesh K., and Jason Cherian Issac. 1994. “Sensitivity Analysis of Aeroelastic Response of a Wing in Transonic Flow.” AIAA Journal 32 (2): 350–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59995
  • Karimi, Mahdi, Korosh Khorshidi, Mehdi Rezaeisaray, and Georgios Moutsanidis. 2022. “Vibration of Variable Stiffness Composite Laminate and Hybrid Composite Laminate Plates Coupled to Sloshing Fluid.” Composite Structures 292: 115630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115630
  • Karpouzian, Gabriel. 1991. “Asymptotic Theory of Bending-Torsion Flutter of High Aspect Ratio Wing in the Torsion Controlled Domain.” AIAA Journal 29 (5): 780–81. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10655
  • Karuskevich, M., T. Maslak, Ie. Gavrylov, Ł. Pejkowski, and J. Seyda. 2022. “Structural Health Monitoring for Light Aircraft.” Procedia Structural Integrity 36: 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.01.008
  • Kassapakis, E. G., and K. Warwick. 1994. “Predictive Algorithm for the Roll Control Autopilot of a Jet Fighter Aircraft.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 8 (4): 359–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.4480080405
  • Kassem, Mohammed, Zhichun Yang, Yingsong Gu, and Wei Wang. 2021. “Modeling and Control Design for Flutter Suppression Using Active Dynamic Vibration Absorber.” Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies 9 (5): 845–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-020-00267-6
  • Kassem, Mohammed, Zhichun Yang, Yingsong Gu, Wei Wang, and Ehab Safwat. 2020. “Active Dynamic Vibration Absorber for Flutter Suppression.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 469: 115110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115110
  • Katunin, Andrzej, Krzysztof Dragan, and Michał Dziendzikowski. 2015. “Damage Identification in Aircraft Composite Structures: A Case Study Using Various Non-Destructive Testing Techniques.” Composite Structures 127: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.080
  • Katz, A., A. Davidovitch, and D. Levin. 1986. “A Split-Canard Configuration for Improved Control at High Angles of Attack.” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 23 (6): 585–89. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25851
  • Katz, Joseph, and Daniel Levin. 1986. “Self-Induced Roll Oscillations Measured on a Delta Wing/canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 23 (11): 814–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45386
  • Kazarin, Petr, Vladimir Golubev, William MacKunis, and Claudia Moreno. 2021. “Robust Nonlinear Tracking Control for Unmanned Aircraft in the Presence of Wake Vortex.” Electronics 10 (16): 1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10161890
  • Kcs, Amardeepa, Polagangu James, and Byji Varughese. 2024. “Analytical Assessment of Composite L Angle Strength under Internal Fuel Pressure in Composite Wing.” Procedia Structural Integrity 60: 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.05.031
  • Keidel, Dominic, Urban Fasel, and Paolo Ermanni. 2020. “Control Authority of a Camber Morphing Flying Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (4): 603–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035606
  • Keith, Michael W., and Bruce P. Selberg. 1984. “Aerodynamic Design Optimization Trim Analysis of Canard Conventionalconfigurations.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (3): 183–92. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48244
  • Keith, Michael W., and Bruce P. Selberg. 1985. “Aerodynamic Canard/wing Parametric Analysis for General-Aviation Applications.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (5): 401–8. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45138
  • Keller, D. 2019. “High-Lift Design for a Forward Swept Natural Laminar Flow Wing.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 11 (1): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-019-00396-z
  • Kendall, Eric R. 1985. “The Theoretical Minimum Induced Drag of Three-Surface Airplanes in Trim.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (10): 847–54. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45214
  • Kenway, Gaetan K. W., and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2016. “Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing.” AIAA Journal 54 (1): 113–28. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j054154
  • Key, David L. 1982. “Handling Qualities Specifications for U.S. Military Helicopters.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (2): 138–44. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57366
  • Khajah, Tahsin, and Sundararajan Natarajan. 2023. “Layup Optimization of Tow-Steered Composite Laminates for Maximum Fundamental Frequency and Flutter Speed Using Differential Evolution.” Composite Structures 310: 116748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116748
  • Khalaf, Kinda, Dongming Gan, and Hooshang Hemami. 2017. “Dynamics and Control of Separable Coupled Rigid Body Systems.” Robotics and Biomimetics 4 (1): 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40638-017-0068-0
  • Khalil, Khalid, Salvatore Asaro, and André Bauknecht. 2022. “Active Flow Control Devices for Wing Load Alleviation.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (2): 458–73. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036426
  • Khalil, Khalid, and André Bauknecht. 2024. “Fluidic Flow Control Devices for Gust Load Alleviation.” Journal of Aircraft 61 (4): 1169–82. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037503
  • Khalil, Mohammad, Dominique Poirel, and Abhijit Sarkar. 2016. “Bayesian Analysis of the Flutter Margin Method in Aeroelasticity.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 384: 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.07.016
  • Khani, A., M. M. Abdalla, Z. Gürdal, J. Sinke, A. Buitenhuis, and M. J. L. Van Tooren. 2017. “Design, Manufacturing and Testing of a Fibre Steered Panel with a Large Cut-out.” Composite Structures 180: 821–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.086
  • Kharghani, Navid, and Christian Mittelstedt. 2022. “Reduction of Free-Edge Effects around a Hole of a Composite Plate Using a Numerical Layup Optimization.” Composite Structures 284: 115139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115139
  • Khargonekar, Pramod P., and N. Sivashankar. 1991. “2 Optimal Control for Sampled-Data Systems.” Systems & Control Letters 17 (6): 425–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(91)90082-p
  • Khodaverdian, Arthur, Dhruv Gohil, and Panagiotis D. Christofides. 2025. “Neural Network Implementation of Model Predictive Control with Stability Guarantees.” Digital Chemical Engineering 16: 100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2025.100262
  • Kholodar, Denis B. 2016. “Aircraft Control Surface and Store Freeplay-Induced Vibrations in Aeroelastic Stability Envelope.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (5): 1538–48. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033772
  • Kholodar, Denis B. 2023. “Aircraft Flutter and Aerodynamic Work.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (1): 56–65. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036846
  • Kida, T. 1982. “An Asymptotic Expression of Lift Slope of Elliptic Wing with High Aspect Ratio.” ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 62 (9): 491–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19820620912
  • Kilgore, Robert A., and Benjamin T. Averett. 1964. “A Forced-Oscillation Method for Dynamic- Stability Testing.” Journal of Aircraft 1 (5): 304–5. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43598
  • Kilimtzidis, Spyridon, Efthymios Giannaros, Athanasios Kotzakolios, et al. 2023. “Modeling, Analysis and Validation of the Structural Response of a Large-Scale Composite Wing by Ground Testing.” Composite Structures 312: 116897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116897
  • Kilimtzidis, Spyridon, and Vassilis Kostopoulos. 2023a. “Multidisciplinary Structural Optimization of Novel High-Aspect Ratio Composite Aircraft Wings.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 66 (7): 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03600-1
  • Kilimtzidis, Spyridon, and Vassilis Kostopoulos. 2023b. “Static Aeroelastic Optimization of High-Aspect-Ratio Composite Aircraft Wings via Surrogate Modeling.” Aerospace 10 (3): 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10030251
  • Kim, Taehyoun. 2016. “Parametric Model Reduction for Aeroelastic Systems: Invariant Aeroelastic Modes.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 65: 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.05.006
  • Kim, Lamsu, and Jeong I. Kim. 2024. “Incremental Nonlinear Dynamics Inversion Control with Nonlinear Disturbance Observer Augmentation for Flight Dynamics.” Applied Sciences 14 (22): 10615. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210615
  • Kim, Joshua P., and Donald L. Kunz. 2017. “Handling Qualities Assessment of an Unmanned Aircraft Using Performance and Workload Metrics.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (10): 2704–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g002306
  • Kim, Dohyung, Hyun-Shik Oh, and Il-Chul Moon. 2019. “Black-Box Modeling for Aircraft Maneuver Control with Bayesian Optimization.” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 17 (6): 1558–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-018-0401-6
  • Kim, Shinhyung, Opayemi Alaba Philip, Abera Tullu, and Sunghun Jung. 2023. “Development and Verification of a ROS-Based Multi-DOF Flight Test System for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.” IEEE Access 11: 37068–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3267128
  • Kim, Wongon, and Byeng D. Youn. 2025. “Physics-Based Digital Twin Updating and Twin-Based Explainable Crack Identification of Mechanical Lap Joint.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 253: 110515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110515
  • King, L. S., and D. A. Johnson. 1986. “Transonic Airfoil Calculations Including Wind Tunnel Wall-Interference Effects.” AIAA Journal 24 (8): 1378–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9448
  • Kirsch, Bertrand, Olivier Montagnier, Emmanuel Bénard, and Thierry M. Faure. 2020. “Tightly Coupled Aeroelastic Model Implementation Dedicated to Fast Aeroelastic Tailoring Optimisation of High Aspect Ratio Composite Wing.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 94: 102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102930
  • Kishi, Yuki, Masahiro Kanazaki, and Yoshikazu Makino. 2022. “Supersonic Forward-Swept Wing Design Using Multifidelity Efficient Global Optimization.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (4): 1027–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036422
  • Klasztorny, Marian, Daniel Nycz, and Rafal Labuda. 2018. “Modelling, Simulation and Experimental Validation of Bend Tests on GFRP Laminate Beam and Plate Specimens.” Composite Structures 184: 604–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.046
  • Klein, Armin, and S. P. Viswanathan. 1973. “Minimum Induced Drag of Wings with Given Lift and Root-Bending Moment.” Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik ZAMP 24 (6): 886–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01590797
  • Klepl, Martin J. 1995. “Digital Flutter Suppression of Active Flexible Wing Using Moment Feedback.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (1): 205–6. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46702
  • Kodama, S. 1962. “Stability of Nonlinear Sampled-Data Control Systems.” IRE Transactions on Automatic Control 7 (1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1962.1105413
  • Kolb, Sébastien, Olivier Montagnier, Laurent Hétru, and Thierry M. Faure. 2019. “Real-Time Detection of an Aircraft Deep Stall and Recovery Procedure.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (5): 1185–94. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003729
  • Konatala, Ramesh, Daniel Milz, Christian Weiser, Gertjan Looye, and E. van Kampen. 2024. “Flight Testing Reinforcement-Learning-Based Online Adaptive Flight Control Laws on CS-25-Class Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (11): 2460–67. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008321
  • Kontogiannis, Spyridon G., A. Mark Savill, Vasileios Mazis, and Vangelis Skaperdas. 2024. “Multiobjective Aerostructural Optimization for Efficient Transport Wing Conceptual Design.” Aerospace Science and Technology 148: 109080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109080
  • Koo, K. N., and I. Lee. 1994. “Aeroelastic Behavior of a Composite Plate Wing with Structural Damping.” Computers & Structures 50 (2): 167–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90293-3
  • Kosmodamianskii, A. S., and V. A. Mitrakov. 1976. “Bending of a Finite Anisotropic Plate with a Curvilinear Hole.” Soviet Applied Mechanics 12 (12): 1282–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00882705
  • Kotitschke, Cedric, Tim Rupprecht, Elyes Bouhlel, and Florian Holzapfel. 2026. “Kriging-Accelerated Worst-Case Search for Envelope-Wide Flight Control Law Optimization.” Aerospace Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-026-00498-7
  • Kousen, Kenneth A., and Oddvar O. Bendiksen. 1994. “Limit Cycle Phenomena in Computational Transonic Aeroelasticity.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (6): 1257–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46644
  • Koyuncuoglu, Heyecan U., and Ping He. 2022. “Simultaneous Wing Shape and Actuator Parameter Optimization Using the Adjoint Method.” Aerospace Science and Technology 130: 107876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107876
  • Krachmalnick, F. M., G. J. Vetsch, and M. J. Wendl. 1968. “Automatic Flight Control System for Automatic Terrain-Following.” Journal of Aircraft 5 (2): 168–75. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43925
  • Kratochvíl, Aleš, and Jakub Valenta. 2024. “Active Flutter Suppression for Light Sport Aircraft by a Control Surface Split.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 15 (4): 977–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-024-00745-7
  • Kretov, Anatolii, and Dmytro Tiniakov. 2022. “Evaluation of the Mass and Aerodynamic Efficiency of a High Aspect Ratio Wing for Prospective Passenger Aircraft.” Aerospace 9 (9): 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9090497
  • Kriechbaum, Gerhard K. L., and Russell W. Stineman. 1972. “Design of Desirable Airplane Handling Qualities via Optimal Control.” Journal of Aircraft 9 (5): 365–69. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58994
  • Kroo, Ilan M. 1982. “Minimum Induced Drag of Canard Configurations.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (9): 792–94. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61557
  • Krüger, Wolf R., Thomas Klimmek, René Liepelt, Hauke Schmidt, Stefan Waitz, and Sunpeth Cumnuantip. 2014. “Design and Aeroelastic Assessment of a Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 5 (4): 419–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-014-0117-0
  • Krüger, Wolf R., Yasser M. Meddaikar, Johannes K. S. Dillinger, Jurij Sodja, and Roeland De Breuker. 2022. “Application of Aeroelastic Tailoring for Load Alleviation on a Flying Demonstrator Wing.” Aerospace 9 (10): 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9100535
  • Krzywoblocki, Zbigniew. 1943. “Torsional and Aileron Flutter.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 10 (5): 161–68. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.11023
  • Kubiak, Tomasz, Adrian Gliszczynski, and Michal Krygier. 2019. “Impact Damage Tolerance of Laminate Short Columns Subjected to Uniform Compression – Experimental Investigation.” Composite Structures 226: 111222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111222
  • Kubica, F., T. Livet, X. Le Tron, and A. Bucharles. 1995. “Parameter-Robust Flight Control System for a Flexible Aircraft.” Control Engineering Practice 3 (9): 1209–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(95)00119-f
  • Kuder, Izabela K., Andres F. Arrieta, and Paolo Ermanni. 2015. “Design Space of Embeddable Variable Stiffness Bi-Stable Elements for Morphing Applications.” Composite Structures 122: 445–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.061
  • Kulikov, A. N. 2020. “The Wing Divergence Problem in a Supersonic Gas Flow.” Journal of Mathematical Sciences 250 (1): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04994-9
  • Kumar, M. Mohan, Kumari Asha, N. Lohith, Byji Varughese, C. Surendra, and C. M. Manjunatha. 2025. “Static Strength Evaluation of Composite Aircraft Wing for One-Wheel Landing Case.” Procedia Structural Integrity 71: 333–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.08.045
  • Kumar, Ajeet, Luca Collini, Alix Daurel, and Jeng-Ywan Jeng. 2020. “Design and Additive Manufacturing of Closed Cells from Supportless Lattice Structure.” Additive Manufacturing 33: 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101168
  • Kumar, Sandeep, Amit Kumar Onkar, and Manjuprasad Maligappa. 2019. “Frequency Domain Approach for Probabilistic Flutter Analysis Using Stochastic Finite Elements.” Meccanica 54 (14): 2207–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01061-9
  • Kumar Shakya, Nishant, and Srikant Sekhar Padhee. 2023. “Optimally Stacked Hygrothermally Stable Composite Laminate with Extension-Bend Coupling.” Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.731
  • Kunaporn, Chalitphan, Mahendra P. Singh, Mayuresh J. Patil, and Rakesh K. Kapania. 2014. “Aeroelastic Divergence of a Randomly Cracked Thin-Walled Beam.” Journal of Aircraft 51 (2): 390–401. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c031885
  • Kuo-Jiun, Lin, Lu Pong-Jeu, and Tarn Jiann-Quo. 1989. “Flutter Analysis of Composite Panels Using High-Precision Finite Elements.” Computers & Structures 33 (2): 561–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90030-8
  • Kuznetsov, N. D., and G. G. Kartashov. 1980. “Applied Theory of Vibrations of Anisotropic Laminate Shells of Variable Stiffness.” Soviet Applied Mechanics 16 (11): 976–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00884879
  • Kwatny, H. G., W. H. Bennett, and J. Berg. 1991. “Regulation of Relaxed Static Stability Aircraft.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 36 (11): 1315–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.100946
  • L’Afflitto, Andrea. 2018. “Barrier Lyapunov Functions and Constrained Model Reference Adaptive Control.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 2 (3): 441–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2018.2842148
  • L’Afflitto, Andrea. 2023. “Model Reference Adaptive Control for Nonlinear Time-Varying Hybrid Dynamical Systems.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 37 (8): 2162–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3631
  • L’Afflitto, Andrea, and Timothy A. Blackford. 2018. “Constrained Dynamical Systems, Robust Model Reference Adaptive Control, and Unreliable Reference Signals.” International Journal of Control 93 (5): 1039–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2018.1489147
  • Lai, Jiing-Yih, and Kung-Fu Young. 1995. “Dynamics of Graphite/epoxy Composite under Delamination Fracture and Environmental Effects.” Composite Structures 30 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(94)00017-4
  • Laitone, E. V. 1978. “Positive Tail Loads for Minimum Induced Drag of Subsonic Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (12): 837–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58457
  • Laitone, E. V. 1989. “Lift-Curve Slope for Finite-Aspect-Ratio Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (8): 789–90. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45841
  • Lam, F. 1993. “Induced Drag of Wings of Finite Aspect Ratio.” AIAA Journal 31 (2): 396–98. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61536
  • Lam, K. Y., K. C. Hung, and S. T. Chow. 1989. “Vibration Analysis of Plates with Cutouts by the Modified Rayleigh-Ritz Method.” Applied Acoustics 28 (1): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-682x(89)90030-3
  • Lampton, Amanda, David Klyde, Dakota Musso, David G. Mitchell, and Matthew Rhinehart. 2024. “Approach to Aircraft Handling Qualities Prediction.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (11): 2397–2408. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008058
  • Landfield, Joseph P., and Dario Rajkovic. 1986. “Canard/tail Comparison for an Advanced Variable-Sweep-Wing Fighter.” Journal of Aircraft 23 (6): 449–54. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45328
  • Landsberger, Brian J., and John Dugundji. 1985. “Experimental Aeroelastic Behavior of Unswept and Forward-Swept Cantilever Graphite/epoxy Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (8): 679–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45186
  • Lang, Jinxi, Yan Li, Yuqing Qiu, and Zhong Wang. 2024. “Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Based Full Envelope Robust Flight Control for Coaxial Compound Helicopter.” Aerospace Science and Technology 154: 109526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109526
  • Laura, P. A. A., and J. P. Viazzi. 1985. “Analysis of Vibrating Orthotropic Rectangular Plates by a Modified Rayleigh-Ritz Method.” Ocean Engineering 12 (1): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(85)90008-3
  • Lavretsky, Eugene. 2019. “Design and Flight Evaluation of Primary Control System for Learjet-25B Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (10): 2157–66. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004328
  • Le, Tung. 2026. “Adaptive Nonlinear Aircraft Pitch Control via LS-SDRE.” International Journal of Dynamics and Control 14 (7): 247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-026-02198-8
  • Lee, I., and M. H. Cho. 1991a. “Finite Element Analysis of Composite Panel Flutter.” Computers & Structures 39 (1–2): 165–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(91)90084-y
  • Lee, In, and Maeng-Hyo Cho. 1991b. “Supersonic Flutter Analysis of Clamped Symmetric Composite Panels Using Shear Deformable Finite Elements.” AIAA Journal 29 (5): 782–83. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10656
  • Lee, K. D., and S. Eyi. 1993. “Transonic Airfoil Design by Constrained Optimization.” Journal of Aircraft 30 (6): 805–6. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46419
  • Lee, In, and Seung-Ho Kim. 1995. “Aeroelastic Analysis of a Flexible Control Surface with Structural Nonlinearity.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (4): 868–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46803
  • Lee, Chang-Yull, and Ji-Hwan Kim. 2021. “Active Flutter Suppression of Smart-Skin Antenna Structures with Piezoelectric Sensors and Actuators.” Aerospace 8 (9): 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8090257
  • Lee, Do Hyeon, Chang-Joo Kim, Sung Wook Hur, and Seong Han Lee. 2020. “Study on the Handling Qualities Enhancement of Fixed-Wing Aircraft Using Adaptive Neural Network.” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 18 (4): 1061–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-018-9403-7
  • Lee, In, Seung-Ho Kim, and Hirokazu Miura. 1994. “Static Aeroelastic Characteristics of a Composite Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (6): 1413–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46667
  • Lee, T., and L. S. Ko. 2009. “Vortex Wake Generated behind a Forward Swept Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 46 (2): 717–21. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39352
  • Lee, I., and J. J. Lee. 1990. “Vibration Analysis of Composite Plate Wing.” Computers & Structures 37 (6): 1077–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(90)90019-x
  • Lee, B. H. K., and L. H. Ohman. 1984. “Unsteady Pressures and Forces during Transonic Buffeting of a Supercritical Airfoil.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (6): 439–41. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44987
  • Lee, Tsu-Tian, and Hsin-Teng Sheu. 1994. “Discrete Time Optimal Control of Linear Time-Delay Systems.” Optimal Control Applications and Methods 15 (2): 115–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.4660150204
  • Lee, Keum W., and Sahjendra N. Singh. 2017. “Immersion and Invariance-Based Adaptive Wing Rock Control with Nonlinear Terminal Manifold.” Nonlinear Dynamics 88 (2): 955–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3287-y
  • Lee, Keum W., and Sahjendra N. Singh. 2018. “Robust Finite-Time Continuous Control of an Unsteady Aeroelastic System.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 41 (4): 978–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003087
  • Lee, Hanmin, Steven Snyder, and Naira Hovakimyan. 2017. “L1 Adaptive Control within a Flight Envelope Protection System.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (4): 1013–26. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001742
  • Lee, B. H. K., and F. C. Tang. 1989. “Transonic Buffet of a Supercritical Airfoil with Trailing-Edge Flap.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (5): 459–64. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45785
  • Lee, Kang-Hyun., and Gun Jin Yun. 2022. “Design Optimization of Thermally Conductive Support Structure for Laser Powder-Bed Fusion Process with Part-Scale Thermal History.” Additive Manufacturing 51: 102627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102627
  • Lei, Ruiwu, Junqiang Bai, Hui Wang, Boxiao Zhou, and Meihong Zhang. 2021a. “Deep Learning Based Multistage Method for Inverse Design of Supercritical Airfoil.” Aerospace Science and Technology 119: 107101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107101
  • Lei, Ruiwu, Junqiang Bai, and Danyang Xu. 2019. “Aerodynamic Optimization of Civil Aircraft with Wing-Mounted Engine Jet Based on Adjoint Method.” Aerospace Science and Technology 93: 105285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.07.018
  • Lei, Pengxuan, Hongtao Guo, Binbin LYu, Dehua Chen, and Li Yu. 2021b. “Verification of a Body Freedom Flutter Numerical Simulation Method Based on Main Influence Parameters.” Machines 9 (10): 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines9100243
  • Leitch, Harry J., Olivia Stodieck, and Jie Yuan. 2025. “The Influence of Coupled Thickness Variation in the Aeroelastic Response of Continuous Tow Sheared Composite Wing.” Composite Structures 374: 119706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119706
  • Lendraitis, Martynas, and Vaidas Lukoševičius. 2023. “Novel Approach of Airfoil Shape Representation Using Modified Finite Element Method for Morphing Trailing Edge.” Mathematics 11 (9): 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11091986
  • Lendraitis, Martynas, and Vaidas Lukoševičius. 2025. “Optimization and Experimental Investigation of a Single-Actuation Compliant Morphing Trailing Edge for Multiple Aerodynamic Configurations.” Actuators 14 (10): 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/act14100498
  • Lennartson, Bengt. 1989. “Sampled-Data Control for Time-Delayed Plants.” International Journal of Control 49 (5): 1601–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207178908559728
  • Leondes, Cornelius T., and Robert R. Rankine. 1972. “Modeling the Effects of Pilot Performance on Weapon Delivery Accuracy.” Journal of Aircraft 9 (4): 286–93. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58972
  • Lepri, Marco, Davide Bacciu, and Cosimo Della Santina. 2024. “Neural Autoencoder-Based Structure-Preserving Model Order Reduction and Control Design for High-Dimensional Physical Systems.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 8: 133–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2023.3344286
  • Lerner, Edwin, and Joel Markowitz. 1979. “An Efficient Structural Resizing Procedure for Meeting Static Aeroelastic Design Objectives.” Journal of Aircraft 16 (2): 65–71. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58486
  • Lerro, Angelo, Alberto Brandl, Manuela Battipede, and Piero Gili. 2020. “A Data-Driven Approach to Identify Flight Test Data Suitable to Design Angle of Attack Synthetic Sensor for Flight Control Systems.” Aerospace 7 (5): 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7050063
  • Levi, O. A., and W. E. Nelson. 1964. “An Analytical and Flight-Test Approach to the Reduction of Pilot-Induced Oscillation Susceptibility.” Journal of Aircraft 1 (4): 178–84. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43579
  • Levison, William H. 1982. “Model-Based Handling Qualities Assessment Technique for Large Commercial Transports.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (4): 311–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57394
  • Li, Zhichen, Yan Bai, Congzhi Huang, and Yunfei Cai. 2016b. “Novel Delay-Partitioning Stabilization Approach for Networked Control System via Wirtinger-Based Inequalities.” ISA Transactions 61: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.12.004
  • Li, Ming, Junqiang Bai, Li Li, Xiaoxuan Meng, Qian Liu, and Bao Chen. 2019d. “A Gradient-Based Aero-Stealth Optimization Design Method for Flying Wing Aircraft.” Aerospace Science and Technology 92: 156–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.05.067
  • Li, Li, Junqiang Bai, and Feng Qu. 2022d. “Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (5): 1179–94. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036413
  • Li, Quhao, Wenjiong Chen, Shutian Liu, and Liyong Tong. 2016c. “Structural Topology Optimization Considering Connectivity Constraint.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 54 (4): 971–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1459-5
  • Li, Dongfeng, Andrea Da Ronch, Gang Chen, and Yueming Li. 2019a. “Aeroelastic Global Structural Optimization Using an Efficient CFD-Based Reduced Order Model.” Aerospace Science and Technology 94: 105354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105354
  • Li, Bingqian, Wenhan Dong, and Chao Xiong. 2018f. “Robust Actuator-Fault-Tolerant Control System Based on Sliding-Mode Observer for Thrust-Vectoring Aircrafts.” Asian Journal of Control 21 (1): 236–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1841
  • Li, Dongfeng, Chunlin Gong, Andrea Da Ronch, Gang Chen, and Yueming Li. 2019c. “An Efficient Implementation of Aeroelastic Tailoring Based on Efficient Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Reduced Order Model.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 84: 182–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.10.011
  • Li, Yu, Qizhi He, Xiaoxiong Liu, Weiguo Zhang, and Xingjian Jing. 2024f. “Robust Flight Control Based on a Nonlinear-L1 Adaptive Control with Modified Piecewise-Constant and HIL Experiments.” Nonlinear Dynamics 113 (9): 9839–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10600-3
  • Li, Jichao, Sicheng He, and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2019b. “Data-Driven Constraint Approach to Ensure Low-Speed Performance in Transonic Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” Aerospace Science and Technology 92: 536–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.06.008
  • Li, Xu, Yabo Hu, Zhili Hou, Simeng Huang, and Bin Liang. 2025c. “High Angle-of-Attack Control of Fixed-Wing UAVs Using Proximal Policy Optimization.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 59 (20): 1563–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.11.380
  • Li, Pengfei, Yuehui Ji, Yu Song, Junjie Liu, and Zengqiang Chen. 2025b. “Fault-Tolerant Control of Post-Stall Maneuver for Fighter Aircraft against Center of Gravity Shift and Actuator Faults.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 35 (11): 4581–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.7925
  • Li, Wencheng, Dongping Jin, and Yonghui Zhao. 2017. “Efficient Nonlinear Reduced-Order Modeling for Synthetic-Jet-Based Control at High Angle of Attack.” Aerospace Science and Technology 62: 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.11.029
  • Li, Kai, Jiaqing Kou, and Weiwei Zhang. 2024a. “Aeroelastic Reduced-Order Modeling for Efficient Static Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Geometric Nonlinearity.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 124: 104055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2023.104055
  • Li, Jiale, Guofei Li, and Xiaojing Zheng. 2025a. “Event-Triggered Formation Control for High-Speed Flight Vehicle Swarms with Angle of Attack Constraints.” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 61 (6): 16541–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2025.3596214
  • Li, Pengfei, Yetong Lin, Yuehui Ji, Yu Song, and Junjie Liu. 2025g. “Super-Maneuver Flight Control Based on Predefined Time Extended State Observer and Control Allocation.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 39 (4): 664–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3967
  • Li, Yu, Xiaoxiong Liu, Qizhi He, Ruichen Ming, Wei Huang, and Weiguo Zhang. 2022b. “L1 Adaptive Structure-Based Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for Aircraft with Center of Gravity Variations.” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 106 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01691-4
  • Li, Yu, Xiaoxiong Liu, Peng Lu, Qizhi He, Ruichen Ming, and Weiguo Zhang. 2021b. “Angular Acceleration Estimation-Based Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Robust Flight Control.” Control Engineering Practice 117: 104938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104938
  • Li, Yu, Xiaoxiong Liu, Ruichen Ming, Kecheng Li, and Weiguo Zhang. 2023a. “Improved Model Reference-Based Adaptive Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Fault-Tolerant Flight Control.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 33 (17): 10328–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6641
  • Li, Runze, Mário Miranda, Lucian Iorga, and Silvestre T. Pinho. 2026c. “Physics-Guided Machine Learning for the Failure Prediction of a Novel Z-Beam Composite Wing Structural Concept.” Composite Structures 394: 120662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2026.120662
  • Li, Wesley W., and Chan-gi Pak. 2015. “Mass Balancing Optimization Study to Reduce Flutter Speeds of the X-56A Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (4): 1359–65. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033044
  • Li, Xing, Wei Qian, Ling Xiao, Xinyu Ai, and Jun Liu. 2024e. “Optimized Design and Test of Geometrically Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity Model for High-Speed High-Aspect-Ratio Wing.” Aerospace 11 (12): 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11121015
  • Li, Yonghong, and Ning Qin. 2020. “Airfoil Gust Load Alleviation by Circulation Control.” Aerospace Science and Technology 98: 105622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105622
  • Li, Yonghong, and Ning Qin. 2021a. “Gust Load Alleviation by Normal Microjet.” Aerospace Science and Technology 117: 106919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106919
  • Li, Yonghong, and Ning Qin. 2021b. “Gust Load Alleviation on an Aircraft Wing by Trailing Edge Circulation Control.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 107: 103407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103407
  • Li, Yonghong, and Ning Qin. 2022. “A Review of Flow Control for Gust Load Alleviation.” Applied Sciences 12 (20): 10537. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010537
  • Li, Yuchun, and Ricardo G. Sanfelice. 2016. “Interconnected Observers for Robust Decentralized Estimation with Performance Guarantees and Optimized Connectivity Graph.” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems 3 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcns.2015.2428351
  • Li, Songyang, Yingjun Shen, Bo Liu, et al. 2026a. “Aerodynamic Configuration and Stability Analysis of a Split-Type Tilt-Rotor Cargo Flying Vehicle.” Aerospace 13 (4): 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13040325
  • Li, Chunzhi, Jianhua Shen, Sheng Zhai, Chengcai Wang, and Jianying Yang. 2018a. “Active Flow Vector Flight Control Using Only SJAs for a Fixed-Wing UAV.” IEEE Access 6: 76535–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2883067
  • Li, Zhaoying, and Shuai Shi. 2021. “\({\mathcal{L}_1}\) Adaptive Loss Fault Tolerance Control of Unmanned Hypersonic Aircraft with Elasticity.” Aerospace 8 (7): 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8070176
  • Li, Yamin, Chenyang Shi, Xiangyu Wang, Shangqin Yuan, Jihong Zhu, and Weihong Zhang. 2025e. “A Mapping-Based Graded Infill Structure Design Method and Continuous Printing Path Planning.” Additive Manufacturing 98: 104639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2025.104639
  • Li, Hangxu, Liguo Sun, Wenqian Tan, Xiaoyu Liu, and Weigao Dang. 2022a. “Incremental Dual Heuristic Dynamic Programming Based Hybrid Approach for Multi-Channel Control of Unstable Tailless Aircraft.” IEEE Access 10: 31677–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3157878
  • Li, Xuyang, Zhiqiang Wan, Xiaozhe Wang, and Chao Yang. 2021a. “Aeroelastic Optimization Design of the Global Stiffness for a Joined Wing Aircraft.” Applied Sciences 11 (24): 11800. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411800
  • Li, Yi, and Tianhong Wang. 2018. “Interval Analysis of the Wing Divergence.” Aerospace Science and Technology 74: 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.001
  • Li, Dan, and Yang Wang. 2021. “Constrained Unscented Kalman Filter for Parameter Identification of Structural Systems.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring 29 (4). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2908
  • Li, Jing, Cong Wang, and Huiting Bian. 2020. “Aerodynamic Design Optimization of Transonic Natural-Laminar-Flow Airfoil at Low Reynolds Number.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5812129
  • Li, Wencheng, Wenyun Wang, Xiaomao Huang, Shun Zhang, and Chenyang Li. 2021e. “Roll Control of Morphing Aircraft with Synthetic Jet Actuators at a High Angle of Attack.” Applied Sciences 11 (2): 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020505
  • Li, Shuaishuai, Shuo Wang, Ying Yu, Xiaoyang Zhang, and Yu Wang. 2021c. “Design of Heterogeneous Mesoscale Structure for High Mechanical Properties Based on Force-Flow: 2D Geometries.” Additive Manufacturing 46: 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102063
  • Li, Ru, Bowen Xu, and Weiqi Yang. 2026b. “Modeling and Control of Rigid–Elastic Coupled Hypersonic Flight Vehicles: A Review.” Vibration 9 (1): 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration9010008
  • Li, Chunzhi, and Jianying Yang. 2017. “Roll Control Using Only Synthetic Jet Actuators at High Angle of Attack.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (1): 371–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033670
  • Li, Keyu, Chao Yang, Xiaozhe Wang, Zhiqiang Wan, and Chang Li. 2023b. “Multiscale Aeroelastic Optimization Method for Wing Structure and Material.” Aerospace 10 (10): 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100866
  • Li, Kangjie, Gil Ho Yoon, and Wenjing Ye. 2026d. “A Weight-Reduction Structural Topology Optimization Method Using a Constraint-Shift Strategy and a Body-Fitted Polygon Mesh.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 69 (4): 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-026-04296-9
  • Li, Jichao, and Mengqi Zhang. 2021a. “Adjoint-Free Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of the Common Research Model Wing.” AIAA Journal 59 (6): 1990–2000. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j059921
  • Li, Jichao, and Mengqi Zhang. 2021b. “Data-Based Approach for Wing Shape Design Optimization.” Aerospace Science and Technology 112: 106639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106639
  • Li, Li, Yu Zhang, Junqiang Bai, and Vassili Toropov. 2024c. “Morphing Wing Design of Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft through Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method.” Engineering Optimization 57 (10): 2922–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2024.2420746
  • Li, Runze, Yufei Zhang, and Haixin Chen. 2024b. “Mesh-Agnostic Decoders for Supercritical Airfoil Prediction and Inverse Design.” AIAA Journal 62 (6): 2144–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j063387
  • Li, Jichao, Mengqi Zhang, Chien Ming Jonathan Tay, et al. 2022c. “Low-Reynolds-Number Airfoil Design Optimization Using Deep-Learning-Based Tailored Airfoil Modes.” Aerospace Science and Technology 121: 107309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107309
  • Li, Yuhan, Shuguang Zhang, Yibing Wu, Sharina Kimura, Michael Zintl, and Florian Holzapfel. 2024d. “An Objective Handling Qualities Assessment Framework of Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing.” Aerospace 11 (12): 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11121020
  • Li, Chunzhi, Tingting Zhang, and Jianying Yang. 2018c. “Attitude Control of Aircraft Using Only Synthetic Jet Actuators When Stall Occurs.” IEEE Access 6: 37910–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2853145
  • Li, Yang, and Li Zhou. 2024. “Flutter Margin Research Based on System Stability Analysis Methods.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 38 (10): 5219–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0901-7
  • Liang, Junzhe, Guangxi Chen, Leigang Li, et al. 2026. “High-Precision Wing Twist Measurement in Transonic Wind Tunnel Using DIC Based Fluorescent Marker Detection Method.” Measurement 258: 119491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.119491
  • Liang, Zhanhong, Jinfeng Gao, and Lina Yao. 2024b. “Robust Fault Detection for Switched Systems with Unstable Modes: A Bumpless Transfer Piecewise Filtering Approach.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 34 (16): 11147–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.7559
  • Liang, Junkai, Hui Ye, Yaohua Shen, and Dawei Wu. 2025. “Transition Process Control of Tiltrotor Aircraft Based on Fractional-Order Model Reference Adaptive Control.” Machines 13 (6): 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13060439
  • Liang, Ke, Zhen Yin, and Qiuyang Hao. 2024a. “A Reduced-Order Method for Geometrically Nonlinear Analysis of the Wing-Upper-Skin Panels in the Presence of Buckling.” Computers & Mathematics with Applications 170: 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2024.06.014
  • Liao, Chung-Li, and Yee-Win Sun. 1993. “Flutter Analysis of Stiffened Laminated Composite Plates and Shells in Supersonic Flow.” AIAA Journal 31 (10): 1897–1905. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11865
  • Librescu, L., and A. A. Khdeir. 1988. “Aeroelastic Divergence of Swept-Forward Composite Wings Including Warping Restraint Effect.” AIAA Journal 26 (11): 1373–77. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10050
  • Librescu, Liviu, and Karam Y. Maalawi. 2009. “Aeroelastic Design Optimization of Thin-Walled Subsonic Wings against Divergence.” Thin-Walled Structures 47 (1): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2008.05.007
  • Librescu, L., and J. Simovich. 1988. “General Formulation for the Aeroelastic Divergence of Composite Swept-Forward Wing Structures.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (4): 364–71. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45572
  • Librescu, Liviu, and Ohseop Song. 1992. “On the Static Aeroelastic Tailoring of Composite Aircraft Swept Wings Modelled as Thin-Walled Beam Structures.” Composites Engineering 2 (5–7): 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9526(92)90039-9
  • Librescu, Liviu, and Surot Thangjitham. 1991. “Analytical Studies on Static Aeroelastic Behavior of Forward-Swept Composite Wing Structures.” Journal of Aircraft 28 (2): 151–57. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46004
  • Liew, K. M., and C. M. Wang. 1993. “Pb-2 Rayleigh: Ritz Method for General Plate Analysis.” Engineering Structures 15 (1): 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(93)90017-x
  • Liguori, Francesco S., Giovanni Zucco, and Antonio Madeo. 2024. “A Geometrically Nonlinear Hellinger–Reissner Shell Element for the Postbuckling Analysis of Variable Stiffness Composite Laminate Structures.” Meccanica 59 (8): 1351–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-024-01799-x
  • Lijewski, Lawrence E. 1988. “Transonic Euler Solutions on a Blunt, Body-Wing-Canard Configuration.” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 25 (6): 393–99. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.26018
  • Lim, S. P., N. R. Senthilnathan, and K. H. Lee. 1989. “Rayleigh-Ritz Vibration Analysis of Thick Plates by a Simple Higher Order Theory.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 130 (1): 163–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(89)90527-0
  • Lin, San-Yih, Yan-Shin Chin, and Yuh-Ying Wang. 1994. “Numerical Investigations on Two-Dimensional Canard-Wing Aerodynamic Interference.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (3): 672–79. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46547
  • Lin, Kuo-Juin, Pong-Jeu Lu, and Jiann-Quo Tarn. 1989. “Flutter Analysis of Cantilever Composite Plates in Subsonic Flow.” AIAA Journal 27 (8): 1102–9. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10228
  • Lindhorst, K., M. C. Haupt, and P. Horst. 2015. “Aeroelastic Analyses of the High-Reynolds-Number-Aerostructural-Dynamics Configuration Using a Nonlinear Surrogate Model Approach.” AIAA Journal 53 (9): 2784–96. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j053743
  • Liu, Jianxing, Hao An, Yabin Gao, Changhong Wang, and Ligang Wu. 2018a. “Adaptive Control of Hypersonic Flight Vehicles with Limited Angle-of-Attack.” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 23 (2): 883–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2018.2800089
  • Liu, Yan, Junqiang Bai, and Eli Livne. 2017c. “Robust Optimization of Variable-Camber Continuous Trailing-Edge Flap Static Aeroelastic Action.” AIAA Journal 55 (3): 1031–43. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j055054
  • Liu, Tong, and Martin Buss. 2022. “Model Reference Adaptive Control of Piecewise Affine Systems with State Tracking Performance Guarantees.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 32 (7): 4129–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6015
  • Liu, Junjie, Zengqiang Chen, Mingwei Sun, and Qinglin Sun. 2019a. “Practical Coupling Rejection Control for Herbst Maneuver with Thrust Vector.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (4): 1726–34. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035338
  • Liu, Yifan, Ye-Hwa Chen, Dejie Yu, and Hui Yin. 2023e. “Prescribed Performance Control for Uncertain Underactuated Systems via Constraint-Following with Application to a PVTOL Aircraft.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 37 (11): 2835–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3664
  • Liu, Yang, Chaoyang Dong, Wenqiang Zhang, and Qing Wang. 2021. “Phase Plane Design Based Fast Altitude Tracking Control for Hypersonic Flight Vehicle with Angle of Attack Constraint.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 34 (2): 490–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.04.026
  • Liu, Xiaoyang, Carol A. Featherston, and David Kennedy. 2019b. “Two-Level Layup Optimization of Composite Laminate Using Lamination Parameters.” Composite Structures 211: 337–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.054
  • Liu, Xiaoyang, Carol A. Featherston, and David Kennedy. 2023c. “A Novel Parallel Method for Layup Optimization of Composite Structures with Ply Drop-Offs.” Composite Structures 312: 116853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116853
  • Liu, Haojie, and Xiumin Gao. 2020. “Identification of Nonlinear Aerodynamic Systems with Application to Transonic Aeroelasticity of Aircraft Structures.” Nonlinear Dynamics 100 (2): 1037–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05553-2
  • Liu, Yishu, Wei Gao, Qifu Li, and Bei Lu. 2023d. “Oblique Projection-Based Modal Matching Algorithm for LPV Model Order Reduction of Aeroservoelastic Systems.” Aerospace 10 (5): 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10050406
  • Liu, Haojie, Xiumin Gao, and Xiao Wang. 2020. “Parametric Active Aeroelastic Control of a Morphing Wing Using the Receptance Method.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 98: 103098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.103098
  • Liu, Xinqiang, and Weiliang He. 2018. “Airfoil Optimization Design Based on the Pivot Element Weighting Iterative Method.” Algorithms 11 (10): 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/a11100163
  • Liu, Junjie, Yuehui Ji, Liang Xu, and Zengqiang Chen. 2024b. “Extended State Observer Based Generalized Predictive Control for Aircraft at High Angle of Attack.” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 22 (8): 2578–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-022-0318-y
  • Liu, Xin, Chen Kan, and Zehao Ye. 2022b. “Real-Time Multiscale Prediction of Structural Performance in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing.” Additive Manufacturing 49: 102503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102503
  • Liu, Chen-Lin, D. M. Li, and Xin Cheng. 2023b. “Enhancing Delamination Resistance with Intralaminar Stiffness Tailoring: A Numerical Study of Variable Stiffness Composites.” Composite Structures 311: 116817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116817
  • Liu, Zhuo, Jie Li, and He Sun. 2026c. “Flight Dynamics Modeling and Sliding Mode Control Law Design for Oblique Wing Aircraft.” Electronics 15 (16): 3532. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15163532
  • Liu, Bangde, and Xin Liu. 2025. “Neural Network-Assisted Design Optimization with Adaptive Sampling for Tow-Steered Composite Structures.” Composite Structures 373: 119588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119588
  • Liu, Fang, Cai Liu, Yalin Wang, and Kangzhi Liu. 2026a. “Finite-Time Control of Multi-Loop Networked Control Systems: A Dual Switching Time-Delay System Method.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 363 (7): 108625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2026.108625
  • Liu, Jian, Kunyu Luo, Haisheng Sun, Yong Huang, Zhitao Liu, and Zhixiang Xiao. 2018b. “Dynamic Response of Vortex Breakdown Flows to a Pitching Double-Delta Wing.” Aerospace Science and Technology 72: 564–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.10.008
  • Liu, Jun, Wei Qian, Yize Zhao, Xin Hu, and Xinyu Ai. 2026e. “Time-Varying Aeroelastic Analysis Coupled with Flight Dynamics of a Flying-Wing Aircraft during the Morphing Process.” Aerospace Science and Technology 176: 112709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.112709
  • Liu, J., W.-P. Song, Z.-H. Han, and Y. Zhang. 2016b. “Efficient Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Transonic Wings Using a Parallel Infilling Strategy and Surrogate Models.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 55 (3): 925–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1546-7
  • Liu, Xiang, Qin Sun, and J. E. Cooper. 2017a. “LQG Based Model Predictive Control for Gust Load Alleviation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 71: 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.10.006
  • Liu, Tingrui, Changle Sun, Kang Zhao, and Ailing Gong. 2022a. “Amplitude Control of Stall-Induced Nonlinear Aeroelastic System Based on Iterative Learning Control and Unified Pitch Motion.” Energies 15 (3): 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030787
  • Liu, Dianzi, Vassili V. Toropov, David C. Barton, and Osvaldo M. Querin. 2015. “Weight and Mechanical Performance Optimization of Blended Composite Wing Panels Using Lamination Parameters.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 52 (3): 549–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1244-x
  • Liu, Haojie, and Xiao Wang. 2019. “Aeroservoelastic Design of Piezo-Composite Wings for Gust Load Alleviation.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 88: 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.04.010
  • Liu, Yixin, Kuankuan Wang, Zhipeng Pan, et al. 2026b. “First Integration of Triboelectric Sensing into Flight Control System for in-Flight Angle of Attack Monitoring and Stall Warning.” Chemical Engineering Journal 546: 180391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2026.180391
  • Liu, Lu, Liren Yang, Ruochen Tai, Yu-Chu Tian, and Chunjie Zhou. 2026d. “Set-Theoretic Safety Control with Formal Guarantees for Uncertain Linear Systems under Sensor Attacks.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 36 (12): 6208–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.70564
  • Liu, Chun-sheng, Qing Ye, and Shao-jie Zhang. 2016a. “Adaptive Control for a Class of Uncertain Linear Parameter-Varying Flight Aircraft Systems.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 31 (2): 210–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2693
  • Liu, Xinzhi, and Kexue Zhang. 2018. “Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems: Distributed-Delay Dependent Impulsive Control.” Systems & Control Letters 120: 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2018.07.012
  • Liu, Ziyang, Miao Zhang, Di Sun, Li Li, and Gang Chen. 2024a. “A Deep Reinforcement Learning Optimization Framework for Supercritical Airfoil Aerodynamic Shape Design.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 67 (3): 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-024-03755-5
  • Liu, Yunqing, Hanzhe Zhang, Qin Wu, Zhifeng Yao, Biao Huang, and Guoyu Wang. 2023a. “Bend-Twist Coupling Effects on the Cavitation Behavior and Hydroelastic Response of Composite Hydrofoils.” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 158: 104286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104286
  • Liu, Tianchang, and Chen Zhao. 2026. “Structure-Aware Fusion Learning and Intelligent Decision Support Based on Dynamic Flight Parameter Hypergraphs in Flight Test.” Scientific Reports 16 (1): 17288. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48452-z
  • Liu, Haiying, Weixin Zheng, Le Qin, Jianxin Feng, and Tiexiang Li. 2025. “Aerodynamic Nonlinear Modeling and Body-Freedom Flutter Suppression of Flying-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (5): 1424–32. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038200
  • Livne, Eli. 2018. “Aircraft Active Flutter Suppression: State of the Art and Technology Maturation Needs.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (1): 410–52. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034442
  • Loja, M. A. R., J. I. Barbosa, and C. M. Mota Soares. 2017. “Dynamic Instability of Variable Stiffness Composite Plates.” Composite Structures 182: 402–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.046
  • Lombardi, G. 1995. “Canard Tip Vortex Splitting in a Canard-Wing Configuration: Experimental Observations.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (4): 875–77. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46804
  • Lombardi, Giovanni, and Mauro Morelli. 1994. “Pressure Measurements on a Forward-Swept Wing-Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (2): 469–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46517
  • Lombardi, G., M. Morelli, and D. Waller. 1996. “Boundary-Layer Transition on a Forward-Swept Wing in Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 33 (6): 1202–4. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.47077
  • Lomo, F. N., M. J. Patel, A. Vargas-Uscategui, P. C. King, and I. S. Cole. 2023. “A Design and Optimisation Framework for Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing of Lightweight Aerospace Structural Components.” Additive Manufacturing 78: 103891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103891
  • Long, Lijun. 2019. “Input/output-to-State Stability for Switched Nonlinear Systems with Unstable Subsystems.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 29 (10): 3093–3110. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4539
  • Long, Shuchang, Xianlian Mu, Yuanhai Liu, Heran Wang, Xiaoqing Zhang, and Xiaohu Yao. 2021. “Failure Modeling of Composite Wing Leading Edge under Bird Strike.” Composite Structures 255: 113005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113005
  • Lottati, I. 1985. “Flutter and Divergence Aeroelastic Characteristics for Composite Forward Swept Cantilevered Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (11): 1001–7. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45238
  • Lottati, I. 1987. “Aeroelastic Stability Characteristics of a Composite Swept Wing Withtip Weights for an Unrestrained Vehicle.” Journal of Aircraft 24 (11): 793–802. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45523
  • Lottati, I. 1988. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Composite Wing with a Decoupler Pylon as a Wing/store Flutter Suppressor.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (3): 271–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45588
  • Loughlan, J. 2019. “The Buckling of CFRP Composite Plates in Compression and Shear and Thin-Walled Composite Tubes in Torsion – the Effects of Bend-Twist Coupling and the Applied Shear Direction on Buckling Performance.” Thin-Walled Structures 138: 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.01.045
  • Loughlan, J., and M. Ata. 1995. “The Restrained Torsional Response of Open Section Carbon Fibre Composite Beams.” Composite Structures 32 (1–4): 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(95)00050-x
  • Lowe, James D. 1988. “Calculation of Lift-Curve Slope Using a Wing Tip Biased Vortex Distribution.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (5): 472–73. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45606
  • Lowson, Martin V. 1990. “Minimum Induced Drag for Wings with Spanwise Camber.” Journal of Aircraft 27 (7): 627–31. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25332
  • Lu, Sen, Lei Cao, Kai-Ming Yang, Ming Zhang, Wen-Sheng Yin, and Yu Zhu. 2025. “Optimal Reaching Filter for Sliding Mode Control to Achieve Time-Optimal Reaching Mode under Input Constraints.” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 23 (10): 2927–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-025-0311-3
  • Lu, Zhidong, Haichao Hong, Matthias Gerdts, and Florian Holzapfel. 2022. “Flight Envelope Prediction via Optimal Control-Based Reachability Analysis.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (1): 185–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006219
  • Lu, Hongqian, Yue Hu, Chaoqun Guo, and Wuneng Zhou. 2019c. “New Stability Criteria for Event-Triggered Nonlinear Networked Control System with Time Delay.” Complexity 2019 (1): 1648576. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1648576
  • Lu, Binwen, Jianjun Ma, and Zhiqiang Zheng. 2019a. “Adaptive Closed-Loop Control Allocation-Based Fault Tolerant Flight Control for an Overactuated Aircraft.” IEEE Access 7: 179505–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2956818
  • Lu, Yi, and V. R. Murthy. 1990. “Stability Sensitivity Studies for Synthesis of Aeroelastic Systems.” Journal of Aircraft 27 (10): 849–50. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45947
  • Lu, Weishuang, Yun Tian, and Peiqing Liu. 2017. “Aerodynamic Optimization and Mechanism Design of Flexible Variable Camber Trailing-Edge Flap.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 30 (3): 988–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.03.003
  • Lu, Peng, Erik-Jan van Kampen, Cornelis de Visser, and Qiping Chu. 2016. “Aircraft Fault-Tolerant Trajectory Control Using Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” Control Engineering Practice 57: 126–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.09.010
  • Lu, Yi, Shu-Guang Zhang, Peng Tang, and Lei Gong. 2015. “STAMP-Based Safety Control Approach for Flight Testing of a Low-Cost Unmanned Subscale Blended-Wing-Body Demonstrator.” Safety Science 74: 102–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.12.005
  • Lu, Yi, Shuguang Zhang, Zejing Zhang, Xuan Zhang, Peng Tang, and Shan Fu. 2019b. “Multiple Hierarchy Risk Assessment with Hybrid Model for Safety Enhancing of Unmanned Subscale BWB Demonstrator Flight Test.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 32 (12): 2612–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.010
  • Lucarini, Marco, Gianpietro Di Rito, Marco Nardeschi, and Nicola Borgarelli. 2025. “Robustness Analysis of the Model Predictive Position Control of an Electro-Mechanical Actuator for Primary Flight Surfaces.” Actuators 14 (8): 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/act14080407
  • Lundry, J. L. 1967. “Minimum Swept-Wing Induced Drag with Constraints on Lift and Pitching Moment.” Journal of Aircraft 4 (1): 73–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43797
  • Lundry, J. L. 1977. “Calculation of Lift and Induced Drag from Sparse Span Loading Data.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (3): 309–11. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44595
  • Lunghitano, Alessandra, Frederico Afonso, and Afzal Suleman. 2024. “A Study on the Surrogate-Based Optimization of Flexible Wings Considering a Flutter Constraint.” Applied Sciences 14 (6): 2384. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062384
  • Lungu, Romulus, and Mihai Lungu. 2015. “Application of H 2 /H ∞ and Dynamic Inversion Techniques to Aircraft Landing Control.” Aerospace Science and Technology 46: 146–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.07.005
  • Luo, Chuan, Federico Ferrari, and James K. Guest. 2024. “Design Optimization of Advanced Tow-Steered Composites with Manufacturing Constraints.” Composites Part B: Engineering 284: 111739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111739
  • Luo, Fei, Junhong Zhang, Pengfei Lyu, Zhengbao Liu, and Wei Tang. 2022. “Carrier-Based Aircraft Precision Landing Using Direct Lift Control Based on Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” IEEE Access 10: 55709–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3175164
  • Lyu, Yongxi, Yuyan Cao, Weiguo Zhang, Jingping Shi, and Xiaobo Qu. 2018. “Dynamic Surface Control Design of Post-Stall Maneuver under Unsteady Aerodynamics.” Aerospace Science and Technology 80: 269–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.06.037
  • Lyu, Zhoujie, Gaetan K. W. Kenway, and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2015. “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing Benchmark.” AIAA Journal 53 (4): 968–85. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j053318
  • Lyu, Zhoujie, and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2015. “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of an Adaptive Morphing Trailing-Edge Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (6): 1951–70. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033116
  • Lyubchak, V. A., and L. A. Fil’shtinskii. 1982. “Bending of a Semiinfinite Anisotropic Plate Weakened by Curvilinear Cuts.” Soviet Applied Mechanics 18 (10): 910–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00883592
  • Ma, Yiyuan, Morteza Abouhamzeh, and Ali Elham. 2023. “Geometrically Nonlinear Coupled Adjoint Aerostructural Optimization of Natural-Laminar-Flow Strut-Braced Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (3): 935–54. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036988
  • Ma, Yiyuan, Morteza Abouhamzeh, and Ali Elham. 2024a. “Aerostructural Optimization and Comparative Study of Twin-Fuselage and Strut-Braced-Wing Aircraft Configurations.” Journal of Aircraft 61 (3): 839–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037388
  • Ma, Zhen, and Xiyuan Chen. 2020. “Strain Transfer Characteristics of Surface-Attached FBGs in Aircraft Wing Distributed Deformation Measurement.” Optik 207: 164468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164468
  • Ma, Xiaoshan, Wenhan Dong, and Bingqian Li. 2019. “A Novel RFDI-FTC System for Thrust-Vectoring Aircraft Undergoing Control Surface Damage and Actuator Faults during Supermaneuverable Flight.” IEEE Access 7: 156374–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2949061
  • Ma, Yueyue, Jie Guo, and Shengjing Tang. 2015. “High Angle of Attack Command Generation Technique and Tracking Control for Agile Missiles.” Aerospace Science and Technology 45: 324–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.06.003
  • Ma, Wenhui, Shuangxi Liu, and Wei Huang. 2025b. “Robust Prescribed-Time Observer-Based Sliding Mode Control: Theoretical Design and Flight Control Applications.” ISA Transactions 167: 1446–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2025.10.014
  • Ma, Jinyu, Shengdong Yu, Wenke Hu, et al. 2024b. “Finite-Time Robust Flight Control of Logistic Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using a Time-Delay Estimation Technique.” Drones 8 (2): 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8020058
  • Ma, Hang, Zhongbin Zhou, and Dingshan Zhang. 2025a. “Control Characteristics Analysis of Multi-Section Morphing Wing Based on Centroid Self-Trimming.” IEEE Access 13: 12996–13014. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3519800
  • Maalawi, Karam Y. 2019. “Comment on “Comment on Aeroelastic Design Optimization of Thin-Walled Subsonic Wings against Divergence” [Thin-Walled Struct., 137 (2019) 433–435].” Thin-Walled Structures 140: 477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.009
  • Mabboux, J., V. Pommier-Budinger, S. Delbecq, and J. Bordeneuve-Guibe. 2024. “Co-Design of a Multirotor UAV with Robust Control Considering Handling Qualities and Motor Failure.” Aerospace Science and Technology 144: 108778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108778
  • Magliacano, Dario, Vincenza Tufano, Annalisa Letizia, Bernardo Sessa, and Matteo Filippi. 2025. “Data-Driven Failure Criteria Prediction in Composite Wing Boxes Using Machine Learning.” Composite Structures 373: 119675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119675
  • Magness, C., O. Robinson, and D. Rockwell. 1993. “Instantaneous Topology of the Unsteady Leading-Edge Vortex at High Angle of Attack.” AIAA Journal 31 (8): 1384–91. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11786
  • Magnus, R., and H. Yoshihara. 1975. “Unsteady Transonic Flows over an Airfoil.” AIAA Journal 13 (12): 1622–28. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60585
  • Mahapatra, Lagnesh, and Omkar Halbe. 2024. “Robust Aeroelastic Response Estimation for Flexible Aircraft.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 57: 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.05.017
  • Mahdavi Zafarghandi, Fatemeh, and Mohammad Reza Soltani. 2024. “Experimental Investigation of the Active Flow Control over a Cranked-Delta Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 61 (1): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037347
  • Mahgoub, Ahmed Osama, and Luca Cortelezzi. 2020. “Vortex Flow and Aerodynamic Performance of a Reverse Delta Wing.” AIAA Journal 58 (2): 537–49. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058021
  • Mahgoub, Youssef, and Ayman El-Badawy. 2022. “Nonlinear Disturbance Observer-Based Control of a Structural Dynamic Model of a Twin-Tailed Fighter Aircraft.” Nonlinear Dynamics 108 (1): 315–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07213-z
  • Maine, Richard E., and James E. Murray. 1988. “Application of Parameter Estimation to Highly Unstable Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 11 (3): 213–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20296
  • Maity, Arnab, Leonhard Höcht, and Florian Holzapfel. 2019. “Time-Varying Parameter Model Reference Adaptive Control and Its Application to Aircraft.” European Journal of Control 50: 161–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcon.2019.04.007
  • Maiworm, Michael, Daniel Limon, and Rolf Findeisen. 2021. “Online Learning-Based Model Predictive Control with Gaussian Process Models and Stability Guarantees.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 31 (18): 8785–8812. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.5361
  • Malcom, Lawrence G. 1969. “Comments on ‘Navy Variable-Stability Studies of Longitudinal Handling Qualities’.” Journal of Aircraft 6 (3): 0285a-0285a. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59426
  • Mallik, Wrik, Rakesh K. Kapania, and Joseph A. Schetz. 2015. “Effect of Flutter on the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (6): 1858–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033096
  • Mammadov, H., and Ch. Hajiyev. 2018. “Reconfigurable Fault Tolerant Flight Control for UAV with Pseudo-Inverse Technique.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (30): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.253
  • Mandal, Tanmay, and Yu Gu. 2016. “Analysis of Pilot-Induced-Oscillation and Pilot Vehicle System Stability Using UAS Flight Experiments.” Aerospace 3 (4): 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace3040042
  • Manickam, Ganapathi, Olivier Polit, Sudarshan Naik, and Dinesh Prasanth Ganapathi. 2025. “Flexural Free Vibration Behaviors of Bimodular Composite Laminates with Variable Angle Tow-Steered Fiber-Reinforced Layers.” Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures 33 (1): 2505158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2025.2505158
  • Mannini, C., and G. Bartoli. 2015. “Aerodynamic Uncertainty Propagation in Bridge Flutter Analysis.” Structural Safety 52: 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.07.005
  • Mao, Sen, Changchuan Xie, Lan Yang, and Chao Yang. 2019. “Static Aeroelastic Characteristics of Morphing Trailing-Edge Wing Using Geometrically Exact Vortex Lattice Method.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2019: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5847627
  • Marano, Aniello Daniele, Marika Belardo, Jacopo Beretta, et al. 2022. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of the Next Generation Civil Tiltrotor Technological Demonstrator Composite Wing.” Aerospace 9 (7): 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9070335
  • Mardanpour, Pezhman, Ehsan Izadpanahi, Siavash Rastkar, Sukeerth Calastawad, and Cesar Levy. 2018. “Effect of Shooting and Blast-Induced Gust on Nonlinear Aeroelastic Stability and Behavior of High-Aspect Ratio Wing.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 433: 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.06.067
  • Marín, J. C., and E. Graciani. 2022. “Normal Stress Flow Evaluation in Composite Aircraft Wing Sections by Strength of Material Models.” Composite Structures 282: 115088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115088
  • Marques, F. D., S. Natarajan, and A. J. M. Ferreira. 2017. “Evolutionary-Based Aeroelastic Tailoring of Stiffened Laminate Composite Panels in Supersonic Flow Regime.” Composite Structures 167: 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.062
  • Marqui, Clayton R., Douglas D. Bueno, Luiz C. S. Goes, and Paulo J. P. Gonçalves. 2017. “A Reduced Order State Space Model for Aeroelastic Analysis in Time Domain.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 69: 428–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.01.010
  • Martínez-Heredia, Juana M., Alberto Fernández-Prada, and Francisco Colodro. 2026. “Electromechanical Flight-Control Actuation Systems for More-Electric Aircraft: Architectures, Energy-Efficiency Trade-Offs, Fault Tolerance, and Future Challenges.” Energies 19 (15): 3498. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19153498
  • Martini, Davide, Giacomo Innocenti, and Alberto Tesi. 2022. “Detection of Subcritical Hopf and Fold Bifurcations in an Aeroelastic System via the Describing Function Method.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 157: 111892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111892
  • Masini, Luke, Sebastian Timme, and Andrew J. Peace. 2020. “Scale-Resolving Simulations of a Civil Aircraft Wing Transonic Shock-Buffet Experiment.” AIAA Journal 58 (10): 4322–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j059219
  • Mathur, Harsh, Eric Huang, and Earl Dowell. 2026. “Experimental Study of Aeroelastic Divergence.” AIAA Journal 64 (5): 2988–93. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j066300
  • Matos, Nuno M. B., and André C. Marta. 2025. “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wing–Fuselage Intersection for Minimum Interference Drag.” Aerospace 12 (5): 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050369
  • “Matrix Cracking and Stiffness Reduction during the Fatigue of a (0/90)9 GFRP Laminate.” 1985. Composites 16 (4): 340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(85)90361-1
  • Matt, Justin J., Haiyang Chao, Mosarruf H. Shawon, Benjamin C. Svoboda, and Steven G. Hagerott. 2025. “System Identification for Small Flying-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Using Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Flight Data.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (4): 961–77. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038147
  • Mayer, R., T. Lutz, E. Krämer, and J. Dandois. 2019. “Control of Transonic Buffet by Shock Control Bumps on Wing-Body Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (2): 556–68. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034969
  • Mayer, Natalie, Jens Prowe, Tamas Havar, Roland Hinterhölzl, and Klaus Drechsler. 2016. “Structural Analysis of Composite Components Considering Manufacturing Effect.” Composite Structures 140: 776–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.023
  • Mazaheri, K., K. C. Kiani, A. Nejati, M. Zeinalpour, and R. Taheri. 2015b. “Optimization and Analysis of Shock Wave/boundary Layer Interaction for Drag Reduction by Shock Control Bump.” Aerospace Science and Technology 42: 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.01.007
  • Mazaheri, K., and A. Nejati. 2015. “The Multi-Point Optimization of Shock Control Bump with Constant-Lift Constraint Enhanced with Suction and Blowing for a Supercritical Airfoil.” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 96 (3): 639–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-015-9671-8
  • Mazaheri, K., A. Nejati, and K. Chaharlang Kiani. 2016. “Application of the Adjoint Multi-Point and the Robust Optimization of Shock Control Bump for Transonic Aerofoils and Wings.” Engineering Optimization 48 (11): 1887–1909. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2016.1139811
  • Mazaheri, K., A. Nejati, K. Chaharlang Kiani, and R. Taheri. 2015a. “The Application of the Gradient-Based Adjoint Multi-Point Optimization of Single and Double Shock Control Bumps for Transonic Airfoils.” Shock Waves 26 (4): 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-015-0591-2
  • McAllister, Robert D., and Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani. 2025. “Distributionally Robust Model Predictive Control: Closed-Loop Guarantees and Scalable Algorithms.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 70 (5): 2963–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2024.3498702
  • McCutchen, C. W. 1980. “Avoiding Divergent Stall in Control Configured Aircraft by Using a Canard Arrangement.” Journal of Aircraft 17 (4): 283–84. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44655
  • McDonnell, Taylor, and Andrew Ning. 2020. “Gradient-Based Optimization of Solar-Regenerative High-Altitude Long-Endurance Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (6): 1189–1201. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035566
  • McGREGOR, D. M., and R. E. Smith. 1966. “Handling Qualities Research at the National Aeronautical Establishment, Ottawa, Using Airborne V/STOL Simulators.” Journal of Aircraft 3 (6): 578–85. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43780
  • McGurk, Michael, Olivia Stodieck, and Jie Yuan. 2024. “Probabilistic Aeroelastic Analysis of High-Fidelity Composite Aircraft Wing with Manufacturing Variability.” Composite Structures 329: 117794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117794
  • McIntosh, Kristoff F., Sandipan Mishra, and Jean-Paul Reddinger. 2024. “Aerodynamic Feedforward-Feedback Architecture for Tailsitter Control in Hybrid Flight Regimes.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (10): 2073–84. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008002
  • McKlNNEY, LlNWOOD W., and Samuel M. DOLLYHlGH. 1971. “Some Trim Drag Considerations for Maneuvering Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (8): 623–29. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59148
  • McMaster, John R., and Frederick L. Schenk. 1974. “Development of the F-12 Aircraft Flight Control System.” Journal of Aircraft 11 (4): 225–31. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59224
  • McRuer, D., D. Johnston, and T. Myers. 1986. “A Perspective on Superaugmented Flight Control: Advantages and Problems.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 9. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870030478
  • Meglinskii, V. V. 1966. “Bending of an Elliptical Anisotropic Plate with Two Elliptical Holes.” Soviet Applied Mechanics 2 (6): 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00887749
  • Mei, Biao, Haijin Wang, and Weidong Zhu. 2021. “Pose and Shape Error Control in Automated Machining of Fastener Holes for Composite/metal Wing-Box Assembly.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes 66: 101–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.052
  • Menet, J. L., B. Menart, and C. Tournier. 1993. “Three-Dimensional Boundary Layer and Vortex Wake over a Cone at High Angle of Attack: Study of Asymmetries.” Experiments in Fluids 14 (4): 224–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00194012
  • Meng, Tingting, Qiang Fu, Yipeng Zhang, and Xi Cui. 2024. “Observer Based Nonlinear Robust Control for a Flexible Wing with Unknown Time-Varying Output Constraints.” Nonlinear Dynamics 112 (21): 19261–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10046-7
  • Meng, Yu-shan, Li Yan, Wei Huang, and Tian-tian Zhang. 2019. “Detailed Parametric Investigation and Optimization of a Composite Wing with High Aspect Ratio.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2019: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3684015
  • Mhenni, Faida, Jean-Yves Choley, Nga Nguyen, and Christophe Frazza. 2016. “Flight Control System Modeling with SysML to Support Validation, Qualification and Certification.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (3): 453–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.076
  • Michaud, Francois, Hamid Dalir, and Simon Joncas. 2018. “Structural Design and Optimization of an Aircraft Morphing Wing: Composite Skin.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (1): 195–211. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034340
  • Micheli, Boris. 2024. “Active Flutter Suppression: Quantification of Performance Loss Due to Actuator Saturation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (11): 2333–50. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008146
  • Micks, W. R. 1950. “Effect of Torsional Stiffness Requirements on Wing Structural Weight.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 17 (11): 736–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.1784
  • Miles, E., and B. A. Broughton. 2017. “Optimal Control Surface Mixing of a Rhomboid-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (3): 1035–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033900
  • Miller, R. E. 1965. “Structural Analysis Flexible Grid Technique for Sst Wing Parametric Studies.” Journal of Aircraft 2 (4): 257–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43649
  • Miller, George E. 1970. “New Longitudinal Handling Qualities Data: Carrier Approach.” Journal of Aircraft 7 (6): 519–23. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44206
  • Miller, Eugene H. 1986. “Performance of a Forward Swept Wing Fighter Utilizing Thrust Vectoring and Reversing.” Journal of Aircraft 23 (1): 68–75. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45268
  • Miller, David P., and James W. Clark. 1965. “Research on Vtol Aircraft Handling Qualities Criteria.” Journal of Aircraft 2 (3): 194–201. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43639
  • Miller, Gerald D., John H. Wykes, and Michael J. Brosnan. 1983. “Rigid-Body Structural Mode Coupling on a Forward Swept Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (8): 696–702. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44931
  • Milz, Daniel, Marc May, and Gertjan Looye. 2026. “Tandem Tilt-Wing Control Law Design Using Hybrid Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 49 (5): 1566–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g009361
  • Miranda, Mário, Runze Li, Lucian Iorga, and Silvestre T. Pinho. 2025. “Multiscale Modelling Strategy for a Novel Wingbox Structure with Increased Bend-Twist Coupling.” Composite Structures 370: 119291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119291
  • Mirtaba, Mohammad, Mohammad Jeddi, Amirhossein Nikoofard, and Zahra Shirmohammadi. 2022. “Design and Implementation of a Low-Complexity Flight Controller for a Quadrotor UAV.” International Journal of Dynamics and Control 11 (2): 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-01016-1
  • Miyazawa, Yoshikazu. 1993. “Robust Flight-Path Control System Design with Multiple-Delay Model Approach.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 16 (2): 241–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20995
  • Mobayen, Saleh, and Alireza Izadbakhsh. 2025. “Suppressing Wing Rock Motion through Differential Equation Solutions as an Extended State Observer.” Nonlinear Dynamics 113 (14): 18195–18214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11076-5
  • Modaress-Aval, Amir Hossein, Firooz Bakhtiari-Nejad, Earl H. Dowell, David A. Peters, and Hossein Shahverdi. 2019. “A Comparative Study of Nonlinear Aeroelastic Models for High Aspect Ratio Wings.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 85: 249–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.01.003
  • Moens, Frédéric. 2019. “Augmented Aircraft Performance with the Use of Morphing Technology for a Turboprop Regional Aircraft Wing.” Biomimetics 4 (3): 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics4030064
  • Mohamed, Majeed, and G. Madhavan. 2020. “Reduced Order Model Based Flight Control System for a Flexible Aircraft.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 53 (1): 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.06.013
  • Mohammad Zadeh, Parviz, and Mohsen Sayadi. 2018. “An Efficient Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Blended Wing Body UAV Using Multi-Fidelity Models.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 31 (6): 1165–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2018.04.004
  • Mohammadi, Navid, Moein Ebrahimi, Morteza Tayefi, and Amirali Nikkhah. 2025. “Reinforcement Q-Learning Based Flight Control for a Passenger Aircraft under Actuator Fault.” Discover Mechanical Engineering 4 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44245-025-00090-x
  • Mohanty, A. K., and R. K. Chhotaray. 1979. “Optimal Output Feedback Control Law for Time Delay System over Infinite Time.” IETE Journal of Research 25 (8): 339–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.1979.11451910
  • Mohseni, Nima, and Dennis S. Bernstein. 2024. “Retrospective-Cost-Based Model Reference Adaptive Control of Nonminimum-Phase Systems.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 38 (7): 2404–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3810
  • Mojallizadeh, Mohammad Rasool. 2026. “Digital Implementation of the Twisting Controller Using the Deadbeat Technique.” International Journal of Control 99 (8): 2498–2523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2026.2676813
  • Molent, L., and A. Haddad. 2020. “A Critical Review of Available Composite Damage Growth Test Data under Fatigue Loading and Implications for Aircraft Sustainment.” Composite Structures 232: 111568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111568
  • Monshizadeh, Nima. 2020. “Amidst Data-Driven Model Reduction and Control.” IEEE Control Systems Letters: 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2020.2993986
  • Montgomery, Raymond C. 1972. “Analytic Design of Digital Flight Controllers to Realize Aircraft Flying Quality Specifications.” Journal of Aircraft 9 (7): 456–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59015
  • Montgomery, Raymond C., and Alper K. Caglayan. 1976. “Failure Accommodation in Digital Flight Control Systems by Bayesian Decision Theory.” Journal of Aircraft 13 (2): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58633
  • Montgomery, Raymond C., and Douglas B. Price. 1976. “Failure Accommodation in Digital Flight Control Systems Accounting for Nonlinear Aircraft Dynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 13 (2): 76–82. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58634
  • Moorhouse, David J., and Michael W. M. Jenkins. 1975. “Use of Short Period Frequency Requirements in Horizontal Tail Sizing.” Journal of Aircraft 12 (6): 560–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44474
  • Moosavi, Reza, and Faris Elasha. 2022. “Smart Wing Flutter Suppression.” Designs 6 (2): 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6020029
  • Moreira, Marco A. G., Juliano A. B. Gripp, Takashi Yoneyama, and Cleverson M. P. Marinho. 2022. “Longitudinal Flight Control Law Design with Integrated Envelope Protection.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (9): 1739–49. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006443
  • Moreira, J. A., F. Moleiro, A. L. Araújo, and A. Pagani. 2024. “Active Aeroelastic Flutter Control of Supersonic Smart Variable Stiffness Composite Panels Using Layerwise Models.” Composite Structures 343: 118287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118287
  • Morino, Hiroyuki, and Shigeru Obayashi. 2015. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of Control Surface with Freeplay Using Computational-Fluid-Dynamics-Based Reduced-Order Models.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (2): 569–83. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c032775
  • Morozov, Andrey, and Klaus Janschek. 2016. “Flight Control Software Failure Mitigation: Design Optimization for Software-Implemented Fault Detectors.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (17): 248–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.043
  • Mu, Xusheng, Rui Huang, Qitong Zou, and Haiyan Hu. 2022. “Machine Learning-Based Active Flutter Suppression for a Flexible Flying-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 529: 116916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2022.116916
  • Mu, Xusheng, Rui Huang, Qitong Zou, Xinghua Zhou, Haojie Liu, and Haiyan Hu. 2026. “Rigid-Elastic-Coupled Aeroservoelastic Modeling and Flight Test Verification of a Flexible Flying-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 621: 119440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2025.119440
  • Mukherjee, Moumita, and Suman Halder. 2017. “Stabilization and Control of Chaos Based on Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” Energy Procedia 117: 731–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.188
  • Mukherjee, Bijoy K., and Manoranjan Sinha. 2017. “Extreme Aircraft Maneuver under Sudden Lateral CG Movement: Modeling and Control.” Aerospace Science and Technology 68: 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.030
  • Mulder, J. A. 1988. “Aircraft Flight Control System Identification.” IFAC Proceedings Volumes 21 (9): 1327–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-6670(17)54913-7
  • Muñoz, Álvaro, and Pablo García-Fogeda. 2022. “Active Flutter Suppression of a Wing Section in a Compressible Flow.” Aerospace 9 (12): 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9120804
  • Muñoz, Álvaro, and Pablo García-Fogeda. 2024. “Active Flutter Suppression of a Wing Section in the Subsonic, Sonic and Supersonic Regimes by the H∞ Control Method.” Aerospace 11 (3): 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11030198
  • Murray, Robynne E., Darrel A. Doman, and Michael J. Pegg. 2015. “Finite Element Modeling and Effects of Material Uncertainties in a Composite Laminate with Bend–twist Coupling.” Composite Structures 121: 362–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.035
  • Muscarello, Vincenzo, Giuseppe Quaranta, Pierangelo Masarati, Linghai Lu, Michael Jones, and Michael Jump. 2016. “Prediction and Simulator Verification of Roll/Lateral Adverse Aeroservoelastic Rotorcraft–Pilot Couplings.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 39 (1): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001121
  • Myers, Lawrence P., and Kevin R. Walsh. 1991. “Performance Improvements of an F-15 Airplane with an Integrated Engine-Flight Control System.” Journal of Aircraft 28 (12): 812–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46103
  • Na, Kyung-Mi, and Chang-Hun Lee. 2024. “Identification of Uncertain Parameter in Flight Vehicle Using Physics-Informed Deep Learning.” Journal of Aerospace Information Systems 21 (2): 152–67. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.i011269
  • Nagabhushan, B. L. 1991. “Control Configuration of a Relaxed Stability Airship.” Journal of Aircraft 28 (9): 558–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46064
  • Naganarayana, B. P., and S. N. Atluri. 1995. “Energy-Release-Rate Evaluation for Delamination Growth Prediction in a Multi-Plate Model of a Laminate Composite.” Computational Mechanics 15 (5): 443–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004660050032
  • Nagaraja, K. S., G. C. Lakin, and J. B. Hartley. 1982. “Flutter and Oscillatory Pressure Tests on a 727 Aileron in a Wind Tunnel.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (9): 781–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61555
  • Nagy, Peter, and Marco Fossati. 2022. “Adaptive Data-Driven Model Order Reduction for Unsteady Aerodynamics.” Fluids 7 (4): 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7040130
  • Naihong, Li, Wu Yaohua, and Cui Pingyuan. 1993. “Comment on ‘Equation Decoupling: A New Approach to the Aerodynamic Identification of Unstable Aircraft’.” Journal of Aircraft 30 (3): 431–431. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46361
  • Najmi, Junaid, Haris Ali Khan, Syed Saad Javaid, Asad Hameed, and Faisal Siddiqui. 2024. “Aeroelastic Tailoring for Aerospace Applications.” Heliyon 10 (2): e24151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24151
  • Namani Koureh, Sevda, Hossein Shahverdi, Nima Kakhsaz Malayeri, and Mohammadreza Amoozgar. 2026. “Parallelized Complex Method for Multidisciplinary Optimization of Aeroelastic Performance in Thin-Walled Wing–engine System Using Bidirectional Curvilinear Fiber Pathing.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 69 (6): 157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-026-04311-z
  • Nan, Jin, Junhua Zheng, Bochuan Jiang, Yuhang Li, Jiayun Chen, and Xuanqing Fan. 2024. “A Multi-Objective Optimization Design Method for High-Aspect-Ratio Wing Structures Based on Mind Evolution Algorithm Backpropagation Surrogate Model.” Machines 12 (12): 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines12120907
  • Narendra, Kumpati S., and Shiva S. Tripathi. 1973. “Identification and Optimization of Aircraft Dynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 10 (4): 193–99. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44364
  • Narenshakthi, T., and S. Dharani. 2025. “Hybrid-Triggered Control for Uncertain Networked Control System with Time-Varying Delay and DoS Attacks via Two-Sided Looped Functional.” Complex Analysis and Operator Theory 19 (7): 206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11785-025-01829-w
  • Narimani, Mohammad, Hassan Haddadpour, and Seid H. Pourtakdoust. 2025. “Model Predictive Control of a Flared Folding Wingtip for Gust Load Alleviation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 159: 109992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.109992
  • Nazari, Raheleh, Maria M. Seron, and José A. De Doná. 2017. “Actuator Fault Tolerant Control of Systems with Polytopic Uncertainties Using Set-Based Diagnosis and Virtual-Actuator-Based Reconfiguration.” Automatica 75: 182–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.09.012
  • Nazeer, Nakash, Xuerui Wang, and Roger M. Groves. 2021. “Sensing, Actuation, and Control of the SmartX Prototype Morphing Wing in the Wind Tunnel.” Actuators 10 (6): 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/act10060107
  • Negahban, Mir Hossein, Musavir Bashir, Clovis Priolet, and Ruxandra Mihaela Botez. 2024. “Novel Twist Morphing Aileron and Winglet Design for UAS Control and Performance.” Drones 8 (8): 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8080392
  • Negahban B., A., V. Khalafi, and J. Fazilati. 2025. “Stochastic Isogeometric Analysis of the Free Vibration of Tow-Steered Composite Laminated Plates under Widespread Uncertainties.” Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 54 (1): 2553328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2025.2553328
  • Nekooei, Komail, Malihe Maghfoori Farsangi, and Mojtaba Barkhordari Yazdi. 2021. “Modeling and SPM-Dependent Control of Multi-Rate Networked Control System with Long Time Delay.” Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems 40: 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nahs.2021.101019
  • Newton, Loren J., and Ilan M. Kroo. 2025. “Model Reference Control for Reducing Pilot-Induced Oscillation Tendencies.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 48 (2): 226–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008400
  • Nguyen, Tam W., Kyoungseok Han, and Kenji Hirata. 2025. “Kernel-Based Predictive Control Allocation for a Class of Thrust Vectoring Systems with Singular Points.” Automatica 177: 112270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112270
  • Nguyen, Duc H., Mark H. Lowenberg, and Simon A. Neild. 2021. “Effect of Actuator Saturation on Pilot-Induced Oscillation: A Nonlinear Bifurcation Analysis.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 44 (5): 1018–26. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g005840
  • Nguyen, Ngoc Anh, Sorin Olaru, Pedro Rodríguez-Ayerbe, George Bitsoris, and Morten Hovd. 2016. “Explicit Robustness and Fragility Margins for Linear Discrete Systems with Piecewise Affine Control Law.” Automatica 68: 334–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.10.048
  • Nguyen, Huu Thien, Ionela Prodan, and Fernando A. C. C. Fontes. 2026. “Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Trajectory Tracking for a Fixed-Wing UAV in a Deep-Stall and Perching Landing Maneuver with Guaranteed Stability.” European Journal of Control 88: 101442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcon.2025.101442
  • Nguyen, Nhan T., Kevin Reynolds, Eric Ting, and Natalia Nguyen. 2018. “Distributed Propulsion Aircraft with Aeroelastic Wing Shaping Control for Improved Aerodynamic Efficiency.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (3): 1122–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034448
  • Ni, Zhen, Danwang Li, Liang Ji, and Kai Zhou. 2023. “Aeroelastic Modeling and Analysis of Honeycomb Plates in High-Speed Airflow with Acoustic Load and General Boundary Conditions.” Composite Structures 305: 116504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116504
  • Niblett, Ll. T. 1986. “Aeroelastic Divergence of Trimmed Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 23 (9): 727–28. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45369
  • Niblett, Ll. T. 1988. “Effect of Density Ratio on Binary Wing Flutter.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (3): 284–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45590
  • Niel, Fabien, Alexandre Seuret, Luca Zaccarian, and Casey Fagley. 2017. “Robust LQR Control for Stall Flutter Suppression: A Polytopic Approach.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 50 (1): 11367–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2041
  • Nihtilä, Markku T. 1989. “Adaptive Control of a Continuous-Time System with Time-Varying Input Delay.” Systems & Control Letters 12 (4): 357–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(89)90046-7
  • Nikolaou, Eleftherios, Spyridon Kilimtzidis, Panagiota Kelverkloglou, Vaios Lappas, and Vassilis Kostopoulos. 2026. “Aerostructural Optimization of a Composite Low Reynolds Wing Using Surrogate Modeling Techniques.” Drones 10 (5): 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10050352
  • Nikrad, S. F., H. Asadi, A. H. Akbarzadeh, and Z. T. Chen. 2015. “On Thermal Instability of Delaminated Composite Plates.” Composite Structures 132: 1149–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.019
  • Nitschke, Christian, Angela Vincenti, and Jean-Camille Chassaing. 2019. “Influence of Stochastic Perturbations of Composite Laminate Layups on the Aeroelastic Flutter of a Cantilevered Plate Wing.” Composite Structures 220: 809–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.072
  • Niu, Juan, Fuyang Chen, and Gang Tao. 2018. “Nonlinear Fuzzy Fault-Tolerant Control of Hypersonic Flight Vehicle with Parametric Uncertainty and Actuator Fault.” Nonlinear Dynamics 92 (3): 1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4127-z
  • Niu, Xiaotian, and Jie Li. 2022. “Investigation and Design of the Transonic Laminar Flow Characteristics in a Laminar Aircraft.” Applied Sciences 12 (22): 11820. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211820
  • Noll, T. E., F. E. Eastep, and R. A. Calico. 1984. “Active Suppression of Aeroelastic Instabilities on a Forward-Swept Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (3): 202–8. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48246
  • “Non-Linear Bending of Antisymmetric Angle Ply Laminated Plates.” 1977. Composites 8 (4): 263–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(77)90121-5
  • Noordin, Aminurrashid, Mohd Ariffanan Mohd Basri, and Zaharuddin Mohamed. 2023. “Real-Time Implementation of an Adaptive PID Controller for the Quadrotor MAV Embedded Flight Control System.” Aerospace 10 (1): 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10010059
  • Ntantis, Efstratios L., and Vasileios Xezonakis. 2024. “Improving Transonic Performance with Adjoint-Based NACA 0012 Airfoil Design Optimization.” Results in Engineering 24: 103189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103189
  • O’Donnell, Richard, and Kamran Mohseni. 2019. “Roll Control of Low-Aspect-Ratio Wings Using Articulated Winglet Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (2): 419–30. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034704
  • O’Rourke, Ian, Ilya Kolmanovsky, Emanuele Garone, and Anouck Girard. 2019. “Scalar Reference Governor for Constrained Maneuver and Shape Control of Nonlinear Multibody Aircraft.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (16): 819–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.064
  • Oberkampf, William L., and John D. Nicolaides. 1971. “Aerodynamics of Finned Missiles at High Angle of Attack.” AIAA Journal 9 (12): 2378–84. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.50043
  • Ocali, O., and M. E. Sezer. 1992. “Robust Sampled-Data Control.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 37 (10): 1591–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.256390
  • Ochi, Y., and K. Kanai. 1995. “Application of Restructurable Flight Control System to Large Transport Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 18 (2): 365–70. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21393
  • Ochôa, Pedro, Roger M. Groves, and Rinze Benedictus. 2019. “Systematic Multiparameter Design Methodology for an Ultrasonic Health Monitoring System for Full-Scale Composite Aircraft Primary Structures.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring 26 (5): e2340. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2340
  • Oelker, Hans-Christoph, and Dietrich Hummel. 1989. “Investigations on the Vorticity Sheets of a Close-Coupled Delta-Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (7): 657–66. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45817
  • Ohkawa, Fujio. 1985. “A Model Reference Adaptive Control System for a Class of Discrete Linear Time-Varying Systems with Time Delay.” International Journal of Control 42 (5): 1227–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207178508933423
  • Ohkawa, Fujio. 1986. “Model Reference Adaptive Control System for Discrete Linear Time-Varying Systems with Periodically Varying Parameters and Time Delay.” International Journal of Control 44 (1): 171–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207178608933588
  • Ohkuma, T. 1993. “For the Advance of the Computational Structural Aeroelasticity.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 46-47: 869–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90365-u
  • Ohta, H., P. N. Nikiforuk, and M. M. Cupta. 1979. “Design of Desirable Handling Qualities for Aircraft Lateral Dynamics.” Journal of Guidance and Control 2 (1): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.55828
  • Ohta, H., P. N. Nikiforuk, and M. M. Gupta. 1982. “Analytical Control Law for Desirable Aircraft Lateral Handling Qualities.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 5 (1): 79–85. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56143
  • Oland, Espen, Tom Stian Andersen, and Raymond Kristiansen. 2016. “Subsumption Architecture Applied to Flight Control Using Composite Rotations.” Automatica 69: 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.02.034
  • Onkar, Amit Kumar. 2021. “A Successive Robust Flutter Prediction Technique for Aeroelastic Systems Using µ Method.” Meccanica 56 (10): 2613–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01390-8
  • Onkar, Amit Kumar, A. Arun Kumar, and S. Raja. 2024. “Fluid Structure Interaction Analysis of a High Aspect Ratio Aeroelastic Wing Considering Geometric Nonlinearity.” Sādhanā 49 (4): 298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02629-2
  • Opgenoord, Max M. J., and Karen E. Willcox. 2019. “Design Methodology for Aeroelastic Tailoring of Additively Manufactured Lattice Structures Using Low-Order Methods.” AIAA Journal 57 (11): 4903–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058169
  • Orlik-Ruckemann, K. J. 1983. “Aerodynamic Aspects of Aircraft Dynamics at High Angles of Attack.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (9): 737–52. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44938
  • Osder, S. S., D. C. Mossman, and B. T. Devlin. 1976. “Flight Test of a Digital Guidance and Control System in a DC-IO Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 13 (9): 676–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58699
  • Oshima, Takumi, and Naoki Takano. 2024. “Apparent Properties of Porous Support Structure with Imperfections in Metal Additive Manufacturing.” Additive Manufacturing 84: 104090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104090
  • Ossmann, D., and H.-D. Joos. 2016. “Combining Sensor Monitoring and Fault Tolerant Control to Maintain Flight Control System Functionalities.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (17): 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.009
  • Ossmann, D., and H.-D. Joos. 2017. “Multiobjective Optimization–based Fault-Tolerant Flight Control System Design.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 29 (16): 5341–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3955
  • Othman, Muhammad F., Gustavo H. C. Silva, Pedro H. Cabral, Alex P. Prado, Alberto Pirrera, and Jonathan E. Cooper. 2019. “A Robust and Reliability-Based Aeroelastic Tailoring Framework for Composite Aircraft Wings.” Composite Structures 208: 101–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.086
  • Ouyang, Yan, Yingsong Gu, Xiping Kou, and Zhichun Yang. 2021a. “Active Flutter Suppression of Wing with Morphing Flap.” Aerospace Science and Technology 110: 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106457
  • Ouyang, Hupo, and Yan Lin. 2017. “Supervisory Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control against Actuator Failures with Application to an Aircraft.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 28 (2): 536–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3883
  • Owens, D. Bruce, and John N. Perkins. 1996. “Stability and Control of a Three-Surface, Forward-Swept Wing Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 33 (6): 1206–8. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.47079
  • Oyarhossein, Mohammad Amin, Gabriel Sugiyama, Fernanda Rodrigues, and Hugo Rodrigues. 2025. “Finite Element Model Updating of a Steel Cantilever Beam: Experimental Validation and Digital Twin Integration.” Buildings 15 (21): 3890. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15213890
  • Oyibo, Gabriel A. 1984. “Generic Approach to Determine Optimum Aeroelastic Characteristics for Composite Forward-Swept-Wing Aircraft.” AIAA Journal 22 (1): 117–23. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48423
  • Özdemir, Akın. 2021. “A Fuzzy Mixed-Integer Robust Design Optimization Model to Obtain Optimum Settings of Both Qualitative and Quantitative Input Variables under Uncertainty.” Engineering Optimization 55 (4): 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2021.2016733
  • Padovan, Joseph, and Bernard Gosset. 1974. “Static Fields of Curved Generally Laminated Anisotropic Plate Strips.” AIAA Journal 12 (6): 737–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49342
  • Palframan, Mark C., J. Micah Fry, and Mazen Farhood. 2019. “Robustness Analysis of Flight Controllers for Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Using Integral Quadratic Constraints.” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 27 (1): 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2017.2766598
  • Pan, Dartzi, and Jen-Chieh Cheng. 1995. “Unstructured Euler Flutter Analysis of Two-Dimensional Wing-Tail Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (5): 1152–55. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46853
  • Pan, Jieyun, and Feng Liu. 2019. “Wing Flutter Prediction by a Small-Disturbance Euler Method on Body-Fitted Curvilinear Grids.” AIAA Journal 57 (11): 4873–84. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058120
  • Pangas, Guilherme F. S., and Pedro V. Gamboa. 2025. “Low-Speed Airfoil Optimization for Improved off-Design Performance.” Aerospace 12 (8): 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080685
  • Parbery, Richard D., and Niels Olhoff. 1987. “Optimal Design of Thin-Walled Cylinders of Variable Wall-Thickness Subject to Flexural and Torsional Stiffness Constraints.” Mechanics of Structures and Machines 15 (3): 347–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905458708905123
  • Park, Jangho, Jae-Young Choi, Yeongmin Jo, and Seongim Choi. 2017a. “Stability and Control of Tailless Aircraft Using Variable-Fidelity Aerodynamic Analysis.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (6): 2148–64. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034052
  • Park, Chanhong, Alex Ramirez-Serrano, and Mahdis Bisheban. 2024. “Adaptive Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for Aerial Manipulators.” Aerospace 11 (8): 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11080671
  • Park, Chanhong, Alex Ramirez-Serrano, and Mahdis Bisheban. 2025. “Adaptive Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control with Guaranteed Stability for Aerial Manipulators.” Aerospace 12 (4): 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12040312
  • Passenbrunner, Thomas E., Mario Sassano, and Luca Zaccarian. 2016. “Optimality-Based Dynamic Allocation with Nonlinear First-Order Redundant Actuators.” European Journal of Control 31: 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcon.2016.04.002
  • Patartics, Balint, Gyorgy Liptak, Tamas Luspay, Peter Seiler, Bela Takarics, and Balint Vanek. 2022. “Application of Structured Robust Synthesis for Flexible Aircraft Flutter Suppression.” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 30 (1): 311–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2021.3066096
  • Patel, Twinkle, Manish Kumar, and Shaaban Abdallah. 2022. “Control of Hybrid Transitioning Morphing-Wing VTOL UAV.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 55 (37): 554–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.11.241
  • Patne, Vaishali, Deepak Ingole, and Dayaram Sonawane. 2020. “FPGA Implementation Framework for Low Latency Nonlinear Model Predictive Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 53 (2): 7020–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.443
  • Patni, M., S. Minera, R. M. J. Groh, A. Pirrera, and P. M. Weaver. 2019. “On the Accuracy of Localised 3D Stress Fields in Tow-Steered Laminated Composite Structures.” Composite Structures 225: 111034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111034
  • Patterson, Jacob B., and Joachim L. Grenestedt. 2018. “Manufacturing of a Composite Wing with Internal Structure in One Cure Cycle.” Composite Structures 206: 601–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.052
  • Paul, Michael, and Martin Rein. 2017. “Transonic Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Unconventional Lambda Wing Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (3): 1139–49. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034080
  • Pedrioli, Andrea, Andrea Vaiuso, Noé Pedrazzini, et al. 2026. “Flight Simulation Model of a Multi-Fidelity Digital Twin of an eVTOL Drone.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-00961-3
  • Pendleton, Edmund, Greg Moster, and Donald Keller. 1995. “Transonic Aeroelastic Models of Highly Swept Hypersonic Lifting Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (6): 1169–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46860
  • Peng, Yufan, Su Cao, Xiangke Wang, and Huangchao Yu. 2026b. “Time-Varying Aerodynamic Model and Adaptive Control of the High Angle-of-Attack Maneuvering Flight for Fixed-Wing AAVs.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 56 (5): 3261–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2026.3657656
  • Peng, Xu, Yan Li, Junhao Hu, and Zhong Wang. 2026a. “Self-Learning Robust Fault-Tolerant Control for Aircraft Carrier Landing Using ADHDP.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 36 (13): 6506–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.70594
  • Pereira, D. A., T. P. Sales, and D. A. Rade. 2021. “Multi-Objective Frequency and Damping Optimization of Tow-Steered Composite Laminates.” Composite Structures 256: 112932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112932
  • Pérez, Carlos Alcolea, Spilios Theodoulis, Florian Sève, and Laurent Goerig. 2022. “Automatic Weighting Filter Tuning for Robust Flight Control Law Design.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 55 (16): 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.057
  • Perfect, Philip, Michael Jump, and Mark D. White. 2015a. “Handling Qualities Requirements for Future Personal Aerial Vehicles.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 38 (12): 2386–98. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001073
  • Perfect, Philip, Michael Jump, and Mark D. White. 2015b. “Methods to Assess the Handling Qualities Requirements for Personal Aerial Vehicles.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 38 (11): 2161–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000862
  • Perry, Boyd. 2025. “Theodorsen’s and Garrick’s Flutter Calculations: Revisited.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (1): 224–28. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038025
  • Persoon, A. J., J. J. Horsten, and J. J. Meijer. 1984. “Measurement of Transonic Dips in the Flutter Boundaries of a Supercritical Wing in a Wind Tunnel.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (11): 906–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45061
  • Petre, Augustin, and Holt Ashley. 1976. “Drag Effects on Wing Flutter.” Journal of Aircraft 13 (10): 755–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58707
  • Pfeifle, Ole, and Walter Fichter. 2023. “Minimum Power Control Allocation for Incremental Control of over-Actuated Transition Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 46 (2): 286–300. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006929
  • Pfnür, Stefan, and Christian Breitsamter. 2019. “Leading-Edge Vortex Interactions at a Generic Multiple Swept-Wing Aircraft Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (6): 2093–2107. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035491
  • Phan, Duc-Huynh. 2020. “Aeroelastic Control of Bridge Using Active Control Surfaces: Analytical and Experiment Study.” Structures 27: 2309–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.035
  • Philibert, Marilyne, Kui Yao, Matthieu Gresil, and Constantinos Soutis. 2022. “Lamb Waves-Based Technologies for Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Structures for Aircraft Applications.” European Journal of Materials 2 (1): 436–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/26889277.2022.2094839
  • Phillips, C. 1965. “A Note on Sampled-Data Control Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 10 (4): 489–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1965.1098203
  • Phuekpan, Kantinan, Rachata Khammee, Natee Panagant, Sujin Bureerat, Nantiwat Pholdee, and Kittinan Wansasueb. 2025. “A Comparison of Modern Metaheuristics for Multi-Objective Optimization of Transonic Aeroelasticity in a Tow-Steered Composite Wing.” Aerospace 12 (2): 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12020101
  • Pidaparti, R. M. V. 1993. “Flutter Analysis of Cantilevered Curved Composite Panels.” Composite Structures 25 (1–4): 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(93)90154-i
  • Pidaparti, R. M. V., and Henry T. Y. Yang. 1993. “Supersonic Flutter Analysis of Composite Plates and Shells.” AIAA Journal 31 (6): 1109–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11735
  • Pierre, Juliette, Filippo Iervolino, Rouhollah D. Farahani, Nicola Piccirelli, Martin Lévesque, and Daniel Therriault. 2023. “Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Multifunctional Sandwich Panels with Load-Bearing and Acoustic Capabilities for Aerospace Applications.” Additive Manufacturing 61: 103344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103344
  • Pizzoli, Marco, Francesco Saltari, and Franco Mastroddi. 2022. “Linear and Nonlinear Reduced Order Models for Sloshing for Aeroelastic Stability and Response Predictions.” Applied Sciences 12 (17): 8762. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178762
  • Placek, Robert, and Paweł Ruchała. 2018. “The Flow Separation Development Analysis in Subsonic and Transonic Flow Regime of the Laminar Airfoil.” Transportation Research Procedia 29: 323–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.02.029
  • Plaetschke, E., J. A. Mulder, and J. H. Breeman. 1982. “Flight Test Results of Five Input Signals for Aircraft Parameter Identification.” IFAC Proceedings Volumes 15 (4): 1149–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-6670(17)63152-5
  • Plyako, D. A. 1977. “Optimal Control of a Linear System with Time Delay in the Control.” Siberian Mathematical Journal 18 (2): 264–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00967161
  • Pollack, T. S. C., S. T. Theodoulis, and E. van Kampen. 2024. “Commonalities between Robust Hybrid Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion and Proportional-Integral-Derivative Flight Control Law Design.” Aerospace Science and Technology 152: 109377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109377
  • Pollack, Tijmen, Spilios Theodoulis, and Xuerui Wang. 2026. “Duality between Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion and Quasi-Linear Parameter-Varying Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 49 (7): 1897–1913. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g009559
  • Pollack, Tijmen, and Erik-Jan van Kampen. 2023. “Robust Stability and Performance Analysis of Incremental Dynamic-Inversion-Based Flight Control Laws.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 46 (9): 1785–98. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006576
  • “Polyester, Fibreglass-Reinforced Composite Laminate.” 1978. Composites 9 (2): 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(78)90633-x
  • Poole, Daniel J., Christian B. Allen, and Thomas C. S. Rendall. 2022. “Efficient Aeroelastic Wing Optimization through a Compact Aerofoil Decomposition Approach.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 65 (3): 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03174-4
  • Poole, Daniel J., Christian B. Allen, and Thomas C. S. Rendall. 2026. “Range-Based Problem with Varying Design Point for Transonic Aerodynamic Wing Optimization.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038630
  • Pourtakdoust, Seid H., and Amir H. Khodabakhsh. 2026. “A Deep Learning Density Shaping Model Predictive Gust Load Alleviation Control of a Compliant Wing Subjected to Atmospheric Turbulence.” Aerospace Science and Technology 168: 111214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.111214
  • Poussot-Vassal, Charles, Fabrice Demourant, Arnaud Lepage, and Dominique Le Bihan. 2017. “Gust Load Alleviation: Identification, Control, and Wind Tunnel Testing of a 2-D Aeroelastic Airfoil.” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 25 (5): 1736–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2016.2630505
  • Powers, Bruce G. 1982. “An Adaptive Stick-Gain to Reduce Pilot-Induced Oscillation Tendencies.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 5 (2): 138–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56150
  • Prasad, S. N., S. Nemat-Nasser, and G. Herrmann. 1967. “Bending-Torsional Flutter of a Swept Wing in a High-Density, Low-Speed Flow.” AIAA Journal 5 (2): 316–21. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.3959
  • Preissler, Harald, and Horst Schaufele. 1991. “Equation Decoupling: A New Approach to the Aerodynamic Identification of Unstable Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 28 (2): 146–50. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46003
  • Price, S. J., and B. H. K. Lee. 1993. “Evaluation and Extension of the Flutter-Margin Method for Flight Flutter Prediction.” Journal of Aircraft 30 (3): 395–402. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56887
  • Przekop, Adam, and Dawn C. Jegley. 2014. “Evaluation of a Metallic Repair on a Rod-Stiffened Composite Panel.” Journal of Aircraft 51 (3). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150001217
  • Pusch, Manuel, Andreas Knoblach, and Thiemo Kier. 2019. “Integrated Optimization of Control Surface Layout for Gust Load Alleviation.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 10 (4): 1059–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-019-00367-4
  • Pushtaev, Yu. P. 1989. “The Flutter of a Wing with an Aileron in Transonic Flow.” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 29 (2): 187–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(89)90024-4
  • Qi, Pengyuan, and Xiaowei Zhao. 2020. “Flight Control for Very Flexible Aircraft Using Model-Free Adaptive Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (3): 608–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004761
  • Qi, Pengyuan, Xiaowei Zhao, Yinan Wang, Rafael Palacios, and Andrew Wynn. 2018. “Aeroelastic and Trajectory Control of High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft.” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 54 (6): 2992–3003. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2018.2836598
  • Qiao, Shengjun, Hangshan Gao, Yi Lyu, Lin Hua, and Fusheng Wang. 2018a. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Characteristics Analysis of Composite Wing with High Aspect Ratio Based on Co-Rotational Method.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 82: 619–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.07.009
  • Qiao, Siwei, Jie Wu, Xisheng Zhan, and Tao Han. 2018b. “Performance Limitation of Networked Control Systems with Networked Delay and Two-Channel Noises Constraints.” Systems Science & Control Engineering 7 (1): 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2018.1558421
  • Qin, Yunpeng, Peiqing Liu, Qiulin Qu, and Tianxiang Hu. 2017. “Wing/canard Interference of a Close-Coupled Canard Configuration in Static Ground Effect.” Aerospace Science and Technology 69: 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.06.012
  • Qu, Zheng, and Anuradha M. Annaswamy. 2016. “Adaptive Output-Feedback Control with Closed-Loop Reference Models for Very Flexible Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 39 (4): 873–88. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001282
  • Quagliarella, Domenico, and Emiliano Iuliano. 2017. “Robust Design of a Supersonic Natural Laminar Flow Wing-Body.” IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 12 (4): 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/mci.2017.2742718
  • Quero, David, Pierre Vuillemin, and Charles Poussot-Vassal. 2019. “A Generalized State-Space Aeroservoelastic Model Based on Tangential Interpolation.” Aerospace 6 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6010009
  • Rafi, Melvin, James E. Steck, and John Watkins. 2017. “Kalman-Filter-Based Adaptive Control: Flight Testing on General Aviation Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (9): 2307–15. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g002693
  • Raghavan, P. 1971. “Optimal Design of Sampled-Data Control Systems by Linear Programming.” International Journal of Control 13 (4): 771–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207177108931982
  • Rainbird, J. M., J. Peiró, and J. M. R. Graham. 2015. “Blockage-Tolerant Wind Tunnel Measurements for a NACA 0012 at High Angles of Attack.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 145: 209–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.006
  • Raiola, Marco, Stefano Discetti, and Andrea Ianiro. 2021. “Data-Driven Identification of Unsteady-Aerodynamics Phenomena in Flapping Airfoils.” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 124: 110234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2020.110234
  • Rajpal, D., C. Kassapoglou, and R. De Breuker. 2019. “Aeroelastic Optimization of Composite Wings Including Fatigue Loading Requirements.” Composite Structures 227: 111248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111248
  • Rajpal, D., F. M. A. Mitrotta, C. A. Socci, J. Sodja, C. Kassapoglou, and R. De Breuker. 2021. “Design and Testing of Aeroelastically Tailored Composite Wing under Fatigue and Gust Loading Including Effect of Fatigue on Aeroelastic Performance.” Composite Structures 275: 114373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114373
  • Rao, S. S. 1975. “Finite Element Flutter Analysis of Multi-Web Wing Structures.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 38 (2): 233–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-460x(75)80007-1
  • Rao, Hanyue, Yayun Shi, Junqiang Bai, Yifu Chen, Tihao Yang, and Junfu Li. 2023. “Aerodynamic Optimization Design of Supersonic Wing Based on Discrete Adjoint.” Aerospace 10 (5): 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10050420
  • Rao, Koganti M., and Y. Uma Maheswara Rao. 1992. “Stresses in Edge Stiffened Anisotropic Sandwich Plate.” Composite Structures 22 (3): 139–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(92)90002-t
  • Raouf, Raouf A. 1994. “Tailoring the Dynamic Characteristics of Composite Panels Using Fiber Orientation.” Composite Structures 29 (3): 259–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(94)90023-x
  • Rashed, Ali, and Eralp Demir. 2022. “Design of Variable Stiffness Composites for Maximum Fundamental Frequency Considering Manufacturing Constraints of Tow Steering.” Composite Structures 284: 115151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115151
  • Rashmikant and Yoshiaki Abe. 2026. “Integrated Aerostructural Design of Composite Aircraft Using Inertia Relief and Multi-Objective Optimization.” Aerospace Science and Technology 176: 112653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.112653
  • “Rate Sensitivity of Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness in Graphite/epoxy and graphite/PEEK Composite Materials.” 1988. Composites 19 (1): 80–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(88)90610-6
  • Rathnasabapathy, M., A. P. Mouritz, and A. C. Orifici. 2022. “Impact-under-Load Damage Tolerance of a Fibre Metal Laminate.” Composite Structures 287: 115368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115368
  • Rauer, Eduard. 2019. “Methodology to Analyse Handling Qualities under Force Gradient Transitions of an Active Sidestick.” Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio 98 (3): 231–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-019-00020-7
  • Ray, Ronald J., John W. Hicks, and Russ I. Alexander. 1990. “Development of a Real-Time Aeroperformance Analysis Technique for the X-29A Advanced Technical Demonstrator.” Journal of Aircraft 27. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900057683
  • Reddy, J. N. 1982. “Bending of Laminated Anisotropic Shells by a Shear Deformable Finite Element.” Fibre Science and Technology 17 (1): 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0015-0568(82)90058-6
  • Reddy, C. S. 1987. “Spanwise Pressure Distribution on Delta Wing with Leading-Edge Vortex Flap.” Journal of Aircraft 24 (3): 222–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45421
  • Redeker, G., and G. Wichmann. 1991. “Forward Sweep: A Favorable Concept for a Laminar Flow Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 28 (2): 97–103. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45997
  • Reding, J. Peter, and Lars E. Ericsson. 1977. “Aeroelastic Stability of the 747/0rbiter.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (10): 988–93. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58883
  • Rehan, Muhammad, Naeem Iqbal, and Keum-Shik Hong. 2015. “Delay-Range-Dependent Control of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems under Input Saturation.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 26 (8): 1647–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3372
  • Reid, Lloyd D., Pavan Rajagopal, and Wolf O. Graf. 1994. “Flight Control System Mode Transitions Influence on Handling Qualities and Task Performance.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (5): 1037–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46607
  • Reinbold, Christopher, Christian Breitsamter, and Kaare Sørensen. 2026. “Aerodynamic and Static Aeroelastic Analysis of a High-Agility Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038409
  • Reist, Thomas A., David Koo, and David W. Zingg. 2022. “Aircraft Cruise Drag Reduction through Variable Camber Using Existing Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (6): 1406–15. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036754
  • Reist, Thomas A., David Koo, David W. Zingg, Pascal Bochud, Patrice Castonguay, and David Leblond. 2020. “Cross Validation of Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Methodologies for Aircraft Wing-Body Optimization.” AIAA Journal 58 (6): 2581–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j059091
  • Reist, Thomas A., David W. Zingg, Mark Rakowitz, Graham Potter, and Sid Banerjee. 2019. “Multifidelity Optimization of Hybrid Wing–Body Aircraft with Stability and Control Requirements.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (2): 442–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034703
  • Rekik, Malek, Omar Khaled, Karolos Grigoriadis, and Matthew A. Franchek. 2024. “LHS-GA Based H-Infinity Control for Robust Airfoil Flutter Suppression.” IEEE Access 12: 171500–171512. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3501682
  • Ren, J. G. 1986. “Bending Theory of Laminated Plate.” Composites Science and Technology 27 (3): 225–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(86)90033-3
  • Ren, Yuanqiang, Lei Qiu, Shenfang Yuan, and Qiao Bao. 2017. “On-Line Multi-Damage Scanning Spatial-Wavenumber Filter Based Imaging Method for Aircraft Composite Structure.” Materials 10 (5): 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050519
  • Ren, Cheng, Jiaxin Xu, Cailian Chen, Shanying Zhu, Yehan Ma, and Xinping Guan. 2025. “Digital Twin Enabled Flight Control System Testing: Design, Development, and Implementation.” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 22: 11318–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2025.3532632
  • Ren, Guangjian, Ming Zhang, and Yushuai Guo. 2022. “The Construction of an Aircraft Control Multilayer Network and Its Robustness Analysis.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 2022: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7904892
  • “Report No. 121, the Minimum Induced Drag of Aerofoils.” 1921. Journal of the Franklin Institute 192 (5): 690. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-0032(21)90863-9
  • “Report No. 349. a Proof of the Theorem Regarding the Distribution of Lift over the Span, for Minimum Induced Drag.” 1930. Journal of the Franklin Institute 210 (4): 528. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-0032(30)90271-2
  • Restifo, Alessandro, Eugenia Villa, Andrea Baldi, Ugo Mariani, and Mara Tanelli. 2026. “Dynamic Multi-Stream Network with Confidence Gating for Efficient Flight Condition Recognition.” Machine Learning with Applications 24: 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.100896
  • Reyes, Manuel, Hector Climent, Moti Karpel, Felix Arévalo, and Carlos Maderuelo. 2019. “Examples on Increased-Order Aeroservoelastic Modeling.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 10 (4): 1071–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-019-00361-w
  • Richards, Phillip W., Yuan Yao, Robert A. Herd, Dewey H. Hodges, and Pezhman Mardanpour. 2016. “Effect of Inertial and Constitutive Properties on Body-Freedom Flutter for Flying Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (3): 756–67. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033435
  • Richter, David J., Ricardo A. Calix, and Kyungbaek Kim. 2024. “A Review of Reinforcement Learning for Fixed-Wing Aircraft Control Tasks.” IEEE Access 12: 103026–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3433540
  • Rieck, Leif, Benjamin Herrmann, Oliver Luderer, and Frank Thielecke. 2026. “Model Predictive Gust Load Alleviation for a Flexible Wing Considering System Limitations.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-00991-x
  • Rimer, M., R. Chipman, and R. Mercadante. 1984b. “Divergence/flutter Suppression System for a Forward Swept-Wing Configuration with Wing-Mounted Stores.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (8): 631–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45034
  • Rimer, M., R. Chipman, and B. Muniz. 1986. “Control of a Forward-Swept-Wing Configuration Dominated by Flight Dynamic/aeroelastic Interactions.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 9 (1): 72–79. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20069
  • Ringertz, U. T. 1994. “On Structural Optimization with Aeroelasticity Constraints.” Structural Optimization 8 (1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01742928
  • Riso, Cristina, and Carlos E. S. Cesnik. 2023. “Geometrically Nonlinear Effects in Wing Aeroelastic Dynamics at Large Deflections.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 120: 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2023.103897
  • Rivero, Andres E., Stephane Fournier, Marinos Manolesos, Jonathan E. Cooper, and Benjamin K. S. Woods. 2021. “Experimental Aerodynamic Comparison of Active Camber Morphing and Trailing-Edge Flaps.” AIAA Journal 59 (7): 2627–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j059606
  • Rizzetta, D. P. 1979. “Time-Dependent Response of a Two-Dimensional Airfoil in Transonic Flow.” AIAA Journal 17 (1): 26–32. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61058
  • Roache, Patrick J. 1965. “Comment on ‘the Neutral Point in Stability and Control Analysis’.” Journal of Aircraft 2 (4): 0352–0352. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59234
  • Roberts, Matthew W., Helen L. Reed, and William S. Saric. 2015. “Computational Evaluation and Linear Stability of a Transonic Laminar-Flow Wing Glove.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (2): 595–608. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c032779
  • Rodden, William P. 1981. “Aeroelastic Divergence of Unrestrained Vehicles.” Journal of Aircraft 18 (12): 1072–73. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44744
  • Rodden, William P. 1984. “Aeroelastic Divergence of Unrestrained Vehicles.” Journal of Aircraft 21 (1): 94–96. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56737
  • Rodden, William P. 1989a. “Comment on ‘Divergence Study of a High-Aspect Ratio, Forward Swept Wing’.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (8): 791–791. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45842
  • Rodden, William P. 1989b. “Comment on ‘General Formulation of the Aeroelastic Divergence of Composite Swept-Forward Wing Structures’.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (7): 694–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45825
  • Rodden, William P., and E. Dean Bellinger. 1982. “Unrestrained Aeroelastic Divergence in a Dynamic Stability Analysis.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (9): 796–97. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61559
  • Rodgers, Edward J. 1965. “The Neutral Point in Stability and Control Analysis.” Journal of Aircraft 2 (1): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43615
  • Rodgers, Edward J. 1966. “Relationship between the Neutral Point, Maneuver Point, and Center of Gravity for Stability.” Journal of Aircraft 3 (5): 479–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43765
  • Rodinò, Stefano, and Carmine Maletta. 2024. “Design Considerations and Applications of Shape Memory Alloy-Based Actuation in Morphing Structures: A Systematic Review.” Progress in Engineering Science 1 (4): 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pes.2024.100021
  • Rohella, R. S., and B. Chatterjee. 1979. “Minimization of Time Delay Sensitivity of Time Delay Control Systems.” IETE Journal of Research 25 (5): 219–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.1979.11451847
  • Rohith, G., and Nandan K. Sinha. 2020. “Routes to Chaos in the Post-Stall Dynamics of Higher-Dimensional Aircraft Model.” Nonlinear Dynamics 100 (2): 1705–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05604-8
  • Roizner, Federico, and Moti Karpel. 2018. “Parametric Flutter Margin Method for Aeroservoelastic Stability Analysis.” AIAA Journal 56 (3): 1011–22. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j056514
  • Roizner, Federico, and Moti Karpel. 2019. “Sensitivity of Aeroservoelastic Stability Characteristics Using Parametric Flutter Margins.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (4): 1387–97. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035286
  • Roizner, Federico, Daniella E. Raveh, and Moti Karpel. 2019. “Safe Flutter Tests Using Parametric Flutter Margins.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (1): 228–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035045
  • Rokhsaz, Kamran, and Bruce P. Selberg. 1990. “Static Stability and Control Characteristics of Scissor Wing Configurations.” Journal of Aircraft 27 (4): 294–99. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25271
  • Rong, Leqi, Chunxiao Huang, and Lijun Long. 2022. “Model Reference Safety-Critical Adaptive Control for Nonlinear and Switched Systems.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 36 (4): 999–1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3390
  • Rose, William C., and Arnan Seginer. 1978. “Calculation of Transonic Flow over Supercritical Airfoil Sections.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (8): 514–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58399
  • Rosique, Miguel Á, Raheeg Alamin, and James F. Whidborne. 2019. “Application of LQG and H∞ Gain Scheduling Techniques to Active Suppression of Flutter.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (12): 502–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.293
  • Roufaeil, O. L., and D. J. Dawe. 1982. “Rayleigh-Ritz Vibration Analysis of Rectangular Mindlin Plates Subjected to Membrane Stresses.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 85 (2): 263–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(82)90521-1
  • Rouhi, Mohammad, Hossein Ghayoor, Jeffrey Fortin-Simpson, Tom T. Zacchia, Suong V. Hoa, and Mehdi Hojjati. 2018. “Design, Manufacturing, and Testing of a Variable Stiffness Composite Cylinder.” Composite Structures 184: 146–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.090
  • Roy, Aritras, and Rinku Mukherjee. 2026. “Unsteady Aerodynamics of the Control of Three Dimensional Flow Separation by Morphing a Wing Surface.” European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids 115: 204348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2025.204348
  • Ruhlin, Charles L., Frank J. Rauch, and Catherine Waters. 1983b. “Transonic Flutter Model Study of a Supercritical Wing and Winglet.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (8): 711–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44933
  • Ruhlin, Charles L., Judith J. Watson, Rodney H. Ricketts, and Robert V. Doggett. 1983a. “Evaluation of Four Subcritical Response Methods for on-Line Prediction of Flutter Onset in Wind Tunnel Tests.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (10): 835–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44951
  • Runkel, F., U. Fasel, G. Molinari, A. F. Arrieta, and P. Ermanni. 2018. “Wing Twisting by Elastic Instability: A Purely Passive Approach.” Composite Structures 206: 750–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.095
  • Runyan, H. L., H. J. Cunningham, and C. E. Watkins. 1952. “Single Degree of Freedom Flutter of an Aileron.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 19 (3): 215–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2220
  • Ruo, S. Y., J. B. Malone, J. J. Horsten, and R. Houwink. 1985. “Steady and Unsteady Transonic Airloads on a Supercritical Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 22 (1): 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45076
  • Ruscheweyh, H. P. 1983. “Aeroelastic Interference Effects between Slender Structures.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 14 (1–3): 129–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90017-x
  • Rutkowski, Michael J. 1979. “Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of the AD-1 Manned Oblique-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 16 (6): 401–6. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58539
  • Sabater, Christian, Philipp Bekemeyer, and Stefan Görtz. 2022. “Robust Design of Transonic Natural Laminar Flow Wings under Environmental and Operational Uncertainties.” AIAA Journal 60 (2): 767–82. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j060676
  • Sabatini, Andrea, Giuliano Coppotelli, and Eli Livne. 2026. “Gust Load Alleviation with Active Flutter Suppression: Design, Simulation, and Tests.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 49 (8): 2291–2310. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g009632
  • Sabido, Anthony, Luis Bahamonde, Ramy Harik, and Michel J. L. van Tooren. 2017. “Maturity Assessment of the Laminate Variable Stiffness Design Process.” Composite Structures 160: 804–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.081
  • Sabri, Farhad, Assem Elzaabalawy, and S. A. Meguid. 2022. “Aeroelastic Behaviour of a Flexible Morphing Wing Design for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” Acta Mechanica 233 (2): 851–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-03138-7
  • Sachan, Kapil, and Radhakant Padhi. 2020. “Nonlinear Robust Neuro-Adaptive Flight Control for Hypersonic Vehicles with State Constraints.” Control Engineering Practice 102: 104526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104526
  • Sachs, Gottfried. 1975. “Static Stability and Aperiodic Divergence.” Journal of Aircraft 12 (5): 497–500. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44471
  • Sachs, Gottfried. 1977. “A New Concept of Static Stability and Its Flight Testing in Supersonic Flight.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (9): 874–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44623
  • Saderla, Subrahmanyam, Yoonsoo Kim, and A. K. Ghosh. 2018. “Online System Identification of Mini Cropped Delta UAVs Using Flight Test Methods.” Aerospace Science and Technology 80: 337–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.008
  • Saetti, Umberto, Joseph F. Horn, Tom Berger, and Mark B. Tischler. 2020. “Handling-Qualities Perspective on Rotorcraft Load Alleviation Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (10): 1792–1804. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004965
  • Saheby, Eiman B., Li Jialu, Chen Wang, and Shen Xing. 2026. “Vortex Behavior over a Tailless Forward-Swept Wing with Chine Forebody Configuration.” Aerospace Science and Technology 168: 111026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.111026
  • Şahin, Harun Levent, and Yavuz Yaman. 2018b. “Synthesis, Analysis, and Design of a Novel Mechanism for the Trailing Edge of a Morphing Wing.” Aerospace 5 (4): 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5040127
  • Sahin, Besir, Sedat Yayla, Cetin Canpolat, Huseyin Akilli, and Mehmet Oguz Tasci. 2026. “Control of Vortex Breakdown over the Non-Slender Lambda Wing.” Aerospace Science and Technology 179: 113372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.113372
  • Sahyoun, Dominic, Yannick Boose, Robert Hein, Nico Liebers, and Robert Prussak. 2026. “Design and Manufacturing of an Aileron for a High-Aspect Ratio Wing with Active Flutter Control.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-00954-2
  • Salagame, Adarsh, Shashwat Pandya, Eric Sihite, Alireza Ramezani, and Morteza Gharib. 2025. “NMPC-Based Unified Posture Manipulation and Thrust Vectoring for Fault Recovery.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 9: 2012–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2025.3589412
  • Salahudden, Salahudden. 2025. “Decoupled Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for Aircraft Spin Recovery.” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 61 (2): 3336–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2024.3485604
  • Salahudden, Salahudden, Henil Agrawal, Aditya Karnam, and Anirban Roy. 2024. “Decoupled Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for Aircraft Autonomous Landing with Ground-Effect.” Aerospace Science and Technology 149: 109156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109156
  • Sammonds, Robert I., Walter E. McNeill, and John W. Bunnell. 1982. “Criteria for Side-Force Control in Air-to-Ground Target Acquisition and Tracking.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (9). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201422
  • “Sampling Schemes in Sampled-Data Control Systems.” 1961. IRE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-6 (1): 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1961.6429318
  • Samukham, Surya, Gangadharan Raju, and C. P. Vyasarayani. 2017. “Parametric Instabilities of Variable Angle Tow Composite Laminate under Axial Compression.” Composite Structures 166: 229–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.044
  • Samukham, Surya, Gangadharan Raju, C. P. Vyasarayani, and Paul M. Weaver. 2019. “Dynamic Instability of Curved Variable Angle Tow Composite Panel under Axial Compression.” Thin-Walled Structures 138: 302–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.02.015
  • Samukham, Surya, C. P. Vyasarayani, and Gangadharan Raju. 2020. “Implicit Floquet Analysis for Parametric Instabilities in a Variable Angle Tow Composite Panel.” Composite Structures 233: 111637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111637
  • Sanders, Karl L. 1965. “Subsonic Induced Drag.” Journal of Aircraft 2 (4): 347–48. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43662
  • Sang, Yingli, and Zhengqiang Zhang. 2022. “Discrete Time Partial-State Feedback Model Reference Disturbance Rejection Control.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 37 (1): 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3525
  • Saporito, Marco, Andrea Da Ronch, Nathalie Bartoli, and Sébastien Defoort. 2023. “Robust Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization for Conceptual Design of Flexible Aircraft under Dynamic Aeroelastic Constraints.” Aerospace Science and Technology 138: 108349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108349
  • Sato, Junzo. 1973. “Inverse Method of Designing Two-Dimensional Transonic Airfoil Sections.” AIAA Journal 11 (1): 58–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.6669
  • Sato, Masayuki, Koji Muraoka, Koki Hozumi, Yukihisa Sanada, Tsutomu Yamada, and Tatsuo Torii. 2017. “Flight Demonstration of Simple Preview Altitude Control Algorithm for Unmanned Airplane.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (4): 1571–79. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034244
  • Satt, I., and S. Ilanko. 2007. “On the Use of Negative Penalty Parameters in Aeroelastic Divergence Analysis of Lifting Surfaces.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 23 (8): 1265–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.05.003
  • Savin, Éric, and Jean-Luc Hantrais-Gervois. 2020. “Sparse Polynomial Surrogates for Non-Intrusive, High-Dimensional Uncertainty Quantification of Aeroelastic Computations.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 59: 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2020.103027
  • Saviolo, Alessandro, and Giuseppe Loianno. 2023. “Learning Quadrotor Dynamics for Precise, Safe, and Agile Flight Control.” Annual Reviews in Control 55: 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.009
  • Savithri, S., and T. K. Varadan. 1990. “Comments on “Rayleigh-Ritz Vibration Analysis of Thick Plates by a Simple Higher Order Theory”.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 140 (2): 348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(90)90534-7
  • Schäfer, D., C. Vidy, C. Mack, and J. Arnold. 2018. “Assessment of Body-Freedom Flutter for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 10 (3): 845–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0353-9
  • Schewe, Günter, and Holger Mai. 2018. “Influence of Flexibility on the Steady Aeroelastic Behavior of a Swept Wing in Transonic Flow.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 81: 255–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.04.021
  • Schieni, Rick, Agam Modasiya, Michael Malisoff, and Laurent Burlion. 2024. “Quadrotor Flight Envelope Protection with Trajectory and Yaw Tracking.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 47 (12): 2601–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008048
  • Schildkamp, Roderick, Jing Chang, Jurij Sodja, Roeland De Breuker, and Xuerui Wang. 2023. “Incremental Nonlinear Control for Aeroelastic Wing Load Alleviation and Flutter Suppression.” Actuators 12 (7): 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/act12070280
  • Schmidt, David K. 2016a. “MATLAB-Based Flight-Dynamics and Flutter Modeling of a Flexible Flying-Wing Research Drone.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (4): 1045–55. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033539
  • Schmidt, David K. 2016b. “Stability Augmentation and Active Flutter Suppression of a Flexible Flying-Wing Drone.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 39 (3): 409–22. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001484
  • Schmidt, David K., Brian P. Danowsky, Aditya Kotikalpudi, et al. 2020. “Modeling, Design, and Flight Testing of Three Flutter Controllers for a Flying-Wing Drone.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (4): 615–34. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035720
  • Schuet, Stefan, Thomas Lombaerts, Diana Acosta, John Kaneshige, Kevin Wheeler, and Kimberlee Shish. 2017. “Autonomous Flight Envelope Estimation for Loss-of-Control Prevention.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (4): 847–62. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001729
  • Schuster, David M. 1995. “Application of Navier-Stokes Aeroelastic Methods to Improve Fighter Wing Maneuver Performance.” Journal of Aircraft 32 (1): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46686
  • Schütte, Andreas, Kerstin C. Huber, Neal T. Frink, and Okko J. Boelens. 2018. “Stability and Control Investigations of Generic 53 Degree Swept Wing with Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (2): 502–33. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033700
  • Sciuva, Marco Di. 1992. “Multilayered Anisotropic Plate Models with Continuous Interlaminar Stresses.” Composite Structures 22 (3): 149–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(92)90003-u
  • Scordamaglia, V., M. Mattei, and G. Franzé. 2025. “Norm-Bounded Model Predictive Control Allocation Strategy for an over-Actuated Aircraft.” IEEE Open Journal of Control Systems 4: 518–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/ojcsys.2025.3619810
  • Scott, Robert C., Robert E. Bartels, Christie J. Funk, et al. 2016. “Aeroservoelastic Test of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research Truss-Braced Wing Model.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 39 (8): 1820–33. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000265
  • Seegmiller, W. R. 1963. “Hybrid Digital Analog Pulse-Time Techniques for Flight Control System Computers.” IEEE Transactions on Communication and Electronics 82 (4): 498–503. https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.1963.6373252
  • Seidel, David A., Clinton V. Eckstrom, and Maynard C. Sandford. 1989. “Transonic Region of High Dynamic Response Encountered on an Elastic Supercritical Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (9): 870–75. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45853
  • Seidel, David A., Maynard C. Sandford, and Clinton V. Eckstrom. 1987. “Measured Unsteady Transonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Elastic Supercritical Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 24 (4): 225–30. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45430
  • Seitz, A., A. Hübner, and K. Risse. 2019. “The DLR TuLam Project: Design of a Short and Medium Range Transport Aircraft with Forward Swept NLF Wing.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 11 (2): 449–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-019-00421-1
  • Sen, Subhamoy, and Baidurya Bhattacharya. 2016. “Online Structural Damage Identification Technique Using Constrained Dual Extended Kalman Filter: Constrained DEKF Based Structural Damage Detection.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring 24 (9): e1961. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1961
  • Seraj, Saemul, and Rajamohan Ganesan. 2018. “Dynamic Instability of Rotating Doubly-Tapered Laminated Composite Beams under Periodic Rotational Speeds.” Composite Structures 200: 711–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.133
  • Serani, Andrea, Matteo Diez, and Domenico Quagliarella. 2024. “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in Transonic Conditions through Parametric Model Embedding.” Aerospace Science and Technology 155: 109611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109611
  • Seres, Peter, Cheng Liu, and Erik-Jan van Kampen. 2023. “Risk-Sensitive Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Flight Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 56 (2): 2013–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.1097
  • Serhat, Gokhan, Bekir Bediz, and Ipek Basdogan. 2020. “Unifying Lamination Parameters with Spectral-Tchebychev Method for Variable-Stiffness Composite Plate Design.” Composite Structures 242: 112183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112183
  • Seshadri, Banavara R., and Thiagarajan Krishnamurthy. 2017. “Damage Diagnosis and Prognosis Methodology to Estimate Safe Load for Aircraft Structure.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (2): 694–703. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033940
  • Seyoung, Im. 1990. “Asymptotic Stress Field around a Crack Normal to the Ply-Interface of an Anisotropic Composite Laminate.” International Journal of Solids and Structures 26 (1): 111–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(90)90098-g
  • Shafei, Erfan, Shirko Faroughi, and Timon Rabczuk. 2024. “Optimizing Fiber Paths of Tow-Steered Laminated Composites for Parametric Stability Using Isogeometric Analysis and Genetic Algorithm.” Composite Structures 331: 117917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117917
  • Shafighfard, Torkan, Eralp Demir, and Mehmet Yildiz. 2019. “Design of Fiber-Reinforced Variable-Stiffness Composites for Different Open-Hole Geometries with Fiber Continuity and Curvature Constraints.” Composite Structures 226: 111280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111280
  • Shah, S. G., and R. C. Desai. 1973. “Euler-Lagrange Conditions and Estimation of States for a Discrete-Time Linear System with Time-Delay.” International Journal of Control 17 (6): 1153–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207177308932460
  • Shah, D. H., and A. J. Mehta. 2017. “Fractional Delay Compensated Discrete-Time SMC for Networked Control System.” Digital Communications and Networks 3 (2): 112–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2016.09.006
  • Shakya, Nishant K., and Srikant S. Padhee. 2023. “Computationally Efficient Optimal Design of Hygrothermally Stable Laminate with Bend–twist Coupling by Analytical and Numerical Strategy.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 170: 107546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107546
  • Shankar, Vijaya, and Norman Malmuth. 1983. “Computational Treatment of Three-Dimensional Transonic Canard-Wing Interactions.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (5): 456–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44893
  • Shankar, Vijaya, Norman D. Malmuth, and Julian D. Cole. 1981. “Transonic Flow Calculations over Two-Dimensional Canard-Wing Systems.” Journal of Aircraft 18 (2): 108–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44699
  • Shao, Shiru, Shuangshuang Sun, and Huanqi Liu. 2025. “Solution of Deformation of Bend-Twist Coupling Box Beam Subjected to Concentrated Force.” Mechanics of Composite Materials 61 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-025-10258-x
  • Sharifi, Mahshid, Angela Vincenti, and Jean-Camille Chassaing. 2025. “Impact of Material and Geometrical Parameters on the Aeroelastic Tailoring of Uni-Directional Composite Plate-Wings.” Composite Structures 355: 118839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118839
  • Sharma, Balraj, Pooja Agrawal, and Ajay Misra. 2022. “Partial Feedback Linearized RISE Controller for Active Flutter Suppression.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 55 (22): 159–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.03.027
  • Sharqi, Bilal, and Carlos E. S. Cesnik. 2023. “Finite Element Model Updating for Very Flexible Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (2): 476–89. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036894
  • Shearwood, Thomas R., Mostafa R. A. Nabawy, William J. Crowther, and Clyde Warsop. 2020. “A Novel Control Allocation Method for Yaw Control of Tailless Aircraft.” Aerospace 7 (10): 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7100150
  • Sheikhi, Mohammad, Mirmeysam Rafiei Anamagh, Bekir Bediz, and Lutfi Taner Tunc. 2024a. “Conical-Shaped Variable Stiffness Composite Laminates: Design and Fiber Path Planning.” Materials & Design 244: 113142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113142
  • Sheikhi, Mohammad, Mirmeysam Rafiei Anamagh, Bekir Bediz, and Lutfi Taner Tunc. 2024b. “Design of Manufacturable Variable Stiffness Composite Laminates Using Spectral Chebyshev and Normalized Cut Segmentation Methods.” Composite Structures 330: 117836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117836
  • Shen, Yaohua, and Mou Chen. 2022. “Event-Triggering-Based Robust Optimal Control for Post-Stall Pitching Maneuver of Aircraft.” Optimal Control Applications and Methods 44 (3): 1356–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2952
  • Shen, Yaohua, and Mou Chen. 2024. “Event-Triggering-Learning-Based ADP Control for Post-Stall Pitching Maneuver of Aircraft.” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 54 (1): 423–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2022.3213178
  • Shen, Lin, Da Huang, and Genxing Wu. 2021. “Time Delay Compensation in Lateral-Directional Flight Control Systems at High Angles of Attack.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 34 (4): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.07.022
  • Shen, Lu, and Chih-yung Wen. 2018. “Oscillations of Leading-Edge Vortex Breakdown Locations over a Delta Wing.” AIAA Journal 56 (6): 2113–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j056565
  • Sherrer, V. C., T. J. Hertz, and M. H. Shirk. 1981. “Wind Tunnel Demonstration of Aeroelastic Tailoring Applied to Forward Swept Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 18 (11): 976–83. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57589
  • Sheshanarayana, Sriharsha, Cecil G. Armstrong, Adrian Murphy, Trevor T. Robinson, Nicolae L. Iorga, and James R. Barron. 2026. “Load Case and Constraint Downselection for Structural Optimization.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (1): 315–27. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037564
  • Shi, Tongyu, Yi Gao, Long Xu, and Yantao Wang. 2025. “Research on Aircraft Control System Fault Risk Assessment Based on Composite Framework.” Aerospace 12 (6): 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12060532
  • Shi, Yayun, Qinsheng Lan, Xiayu Lan, Jianhui Wu, Tihao Yang, and Bo Wang. 2023. “Robust Optimization Design of a Flying Wing Using Adjoint and Uncertainty-Based Aerodynamic Optimization Approach.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 66 (5): 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03559-z
  • Shi, Pengtao, Feng Liu, Yingsong Gu, and Zhichun Yang. 2021a. “The Development of a Flight Test Platform to Study the Body Freedom Flutter of BWB Flying Wings.” Aerospace 8 (12): 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8120390
  • Shi, Pengtao, Jihai Liu, Yingsong Gu, Zhichun Yang, and Pier Marzocca. 2020. “Full-Span Flying Wing Wind Tunnel Test: A Body Freedom Flutter Study.” Fluids 5 (1): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5010034
  • Shi, Jingping, Yongxi Lyu, Yuyan Cao, Huakun Chen, and Xiaobo Qu. 2019. “Minimum Parameters Learning-Based Dynamic Surface Control for Advanced Aircraft at High Angle of Attack.” IEEE Access 7: 149724–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2938013
  • Shi, Yayun, Charles A. Mader, and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2021b. “Natural Laminar Flow Wing Optimization Using a Discrete Adjoint Approach.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 64 (2): 541–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02936-w
  • Shi, Chuanbeibei, Kaidi Wang, and Yushu Yu. 2022. “Expandable Fully Actuated Aerial Vehicle Assembly: Geometric Control Adapted from an Existing Flight Controller and Real-World Prototype Implementation.” Drones 6 (10): 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6100272
  • Shiau, L.-C., and J.-T. Chang. 1991. “Finite Element Analysis of Supersonic Flutter of Multibay Composite Panels.” Computers & Structures 39 (3–4): 269–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(91)90025-h
  • Shields, V. C., and G. Cook. 1971. “Application of an Approximate Time Delay to a Posicast Control System.” International Journal of Control 14 (4): 649–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207177108932075
  • Shimoda, Masatoshi, Tomohiro Nagano, and Jin-Xing Shi. 2018. “Non-Parametric Shape Optimization Method for Robust Design of Solid, Shell, and Frame Structures Considering Loading Uncertainty.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 59 (5): 1543–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2144-7
  • Shiota, T., and H. Ohmori. 2015. “Variable Reference Model for Model Reference Adaptive Control System.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (14): 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.436
  • Shirk, Michael H., Terrence J. Hertz, and Terrence A. Weisshaar. 1986. “Aeroelastic Tailoring: Theory, Practice, and Promise.” Journal of Aircraft 23 (1): 6–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45260
  • Shmilovich, Arvin, and Norman H. Princen. 2026. “Pneumatic-Based Approach for Flight Control.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038755
  • Shojae, Fardin J., Mehdi Salehi, Mohammad Ja’fari, Artur J. Jaworski, and Bahador Bakhtiari Nia. 2025. “Passive Control of Vortex Breakdown on Slender Delta Wing Using Control Bump and Cavity at Low Reynolds Number.” Ocean Engineering 329: 121086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121086
  • Shomber, Henry A., and W. Marvin Gertsen. 1967. “Longitudinal Handling Qualities Criteria: An Evaluation.” Journal of Aircraft 4 (4): 371–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43851
  • Short, Scott R. 1995. “Characterization of Interlaminar Shear Failures of Graphite/epoxy Composite Materials.” Composites 26 (6): 431–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(95)90916-n
  • Shrivastava, Sachin, Naresh Sharma, Stephen W. Tsai, and P. M. Mohite. 2020a. “D and DD-Drop Layup Optimization of Aircraft Wing Panels under Multi-Load Case Design Environment.” Composite Structures 248: 112518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112518
  • Shrivastava, Prakash C., and Robert F. Stengel. 1989. “Stability Boundaries for Aircraft with Unstable Lateral-Directional Dynamics and Control Saturation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 12 (1): 62–70. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20369
  • Shrivastava, Sachin, Hitesh Tilala, P. M. Mohite, and M. D. Limaye. 2020b. “Weight Optimization of a Composite Wing-Panel with Flutter Stability Constraints by Ply-Drop.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 62 (4): 2181–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02569-5
  • Shukla, Daksh, Hady Benyamen, Shawn Keshmiri, and Nicole M. Beckage. 2025. “Reinforcement Learning-Based Evolving Flight Controller for Fixed-Wing Uncrewed Aircraft.” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 33 (3): 872–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2024.3516383
  • Shukla, Himanshu, and Mayuresh J. Patil. 2017. “Nonlinear State Feedback Control Design to Eliminate Subcritical Limit Cycle Oscillations in Aeroelastic Systems.” Nonlinear Dynamics 88 (3): 1599–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3332-5
  • Sibert, H. W. 1937. “Slope of Lift Curve for Any Aspect Ratio.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 4 (5): 195–195. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.367
  • Sibert, H. W. 1943. “Induced Drag of a Twisted Wing.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 10 (2): 71–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.10986
  • Siddiqui, Bilal A., Sami El-Ferik, and Mohamed Abdelkader. 2016. “Fault Tolerant Flight Control Using Sliding Modes and Subspace Identification-Based Predictive Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (9): 124–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.510
  • Silton, Sidra I., and Frank Fresconi. 2015. “Effect of Canard Interactions on Aerodynamic Performance of a Fin-Stabilized Projectile.” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 52 (5): 1430–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a33219
  • Simbuerger, Michael, Daniella E. Raveh, and Moshe Tur. 2022. “Aeroelastic Shape Control Using Fiber-Optic-Measured Strain Data and Multiple Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 59 (6): 1545–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036626
  • Simmons, Benjamin M. 2023. “System Identification Approach for eVTOL Aircraft Demonstrated Using Simulated Flight Data.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (4): 1078–93. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036896
  • Simmons, Benjamin M., James L. Gresham, and Craig A. Woolsey. 2023. “Aero-Propulsive Modeling for Propeller Aircraft Using Flight Data.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (1): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036773
  • Simon, Daniel, Ola Härkegård, and Johan Löfberg. 2017. “Command Governor Approach to Maneuver Limiting in Fighter Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (6): 1514–27. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g002272
  • Singh, Kumar V., Richard N. Brown, and Raymond Kolonay. 2016. “Receptance-Based Active Aeroelastic Control with Embedded Control Surfaces Having Actuator Dynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (3): 830–45. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033658
  • Singh, Jatinder, and S. C. Raisinghani. 1993. “Aileron and Sideslip-Induced Unsteady Aerodynamic Modeling for Lateral Parameter Estimation.” Journal of Aircraft 30 (4): 512–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46373
  • Sinha, Kautuk, Thomas Klimmek, Matthias Schulze, and Vega Handojo. 2021. “Loads Analysis and Structural Optimization of a High Aspect Ratio, Composite Wing Aircraft.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 12 (2): 233–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-021-00494-x
  • Sisson, Nathaniel, and K. Merve Dogan. 2026. “Stability Analysis of Discrete Adaptive Control with Adaptive Control Allocation for Uncertain Systems.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 40 (8): 1688–1708. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.70091
  • Sivanandi, Periyasamy, Nathish Sanjay, Senthilkumar Chidambaram, and Suresh Varatharaj. 2025. “Design and Numerical Evaluation of Trailing Edge Deflection Distance-Based Morphing Wing.” Eng 6 (12): 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6120354
  • Sleesongsom, Suwin, Sumit Kumar, and Sujin Bureerat. 2022. “Two-Step Multi-Objective Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Aircraft Wing Structures.” Symmetry 14 (10): 2125. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14102125
  • Sleptsov, Ernest S., and Olga G. Andrianova. 2021. “Control Theory Concepts: Analysis and Design, Control and Command, Control Subject, Model Reduction.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 54 (13): 204–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.446
  • Smeltzer, D. B., D. A. Durston, and V. R. Stewart. 1983. “Experimental Wing and Canard Jet-Flap Aerodynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (10): 833–34. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44950
  • Smith, G. Allan, and George Meyer. 1987. “Aircraft Automatic Flight Control System with Model Inversion.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 10 (3): 269–75. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20213
  • Snyder, Steven, Pan Zhao, and Naira Hovakimyan. 2019. “L1 Adaptive Control for Switching Reference Systems: Application to Flight Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (16): 718–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.047
  • Snyder, Steven, Pan Zhao, and Naira Hovakimyan. 2022. “L1 Adaptive Control with Switched Reference Models: Application to Learn-to-Fly.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (12): 2229–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006305
  • Sodja, Jurij, Noud P. M. Werter, and Roeland De Breuker. 2021. “Aeroelastic Demonstrator Wing Design for Maneuver Load Alleviation under Cruise Shape Constraint.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (3): 448–66. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035955
  • Sofi, Alba. 2015. “Structural Response Variability under Spatially Dependent Uncertainty: Stochastic versus Interval Model.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 42: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.09.001
  • Sohst, Martin, José Lobo do Vale, Frederico Afonso, and Afzal Suleman. 2022. “Optimization and Comparison of Strut-Braced and High Aspect Ratio Wing Aircraft Configurations Including Flutter Analysis with Geometric Non-Linearities.” Aerospace Science and Technology 124: 107531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107531
  • Soleymani, T., and A. Ghorbanpour Arani. 2019. “On Aeroelastic Stability of a Piezo-MRE Sandwich Plate in Supersonic Airflow.” Composite Structures 230: 111532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111532
  • Solies, U. P. 1994a. “Comment on ‘Model Flight Tests and Neutral Point Determination’.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (4): 1007–8. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46602
  • Solies, U. P. 1994b. “Effects of Thrust Line Offset on Neutral Point Determination in Flight Testing.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (2): 362–66. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46495
  • Soltani, Ali, Matthew C. Turner, and Christopher M. Richards. 2025. “Anti-Windup Compensation for Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Rigid Body Attitude Control.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 9: 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2025.3577574
  • Somashekar, B. R., G. Prathap, and C. Ramesh Babu. 1987. “A Field-Consistent, Four-Noded, Laminated, Anisotropic Plate/shell Element.” Computers & Structures 25 (3): 345–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(87)90127-1
  • Son, Mi So, Jeong Hwan Sa, Soo Hyung Park, Yung Hwan Byun, and Kum Won Cho. 2015a. “Delayed Detached-Eddy Simulation of Vortex Breakdown over a 70° Delta Wing.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 29 (8): 3205–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0720-y
  • Song, Mengshi, and Panfeng Huang. 2022. “Dynamics and Anti-Disturbance Control for Tethered Aircraft System.” Nonlinear Dynamics 110 (3): 2383–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07742-7
  • Song, Pengchao, and Marc P. Mignolet. 2018. “Reduced Order Model-Based Uncertainty Modeling of Structures with Localized Response.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 51: 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2017.12.002
  • Song, Z. G., L. W. Zhang, and K. M. Liew. 2016. “Aeroelastic Analysis of CNT Reinforced Functionally Graded Composite Panels in Supersonic Airflow Using a Higher-Order Shear Deformation Theory.” Composite Structures 141: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.005
  • Soovere, J. 1982. “Sonic Fatigue Testing of an Advanced Composite Aileron.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (4): 304–10. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44755
  • Spencer, A. J. M., and P. Watson. 1992. “Buckling of Laminated Anisotropic Plates under Cylindrical Bending.” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 40 (7): 1621–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(92)90041-y
  • Stanewsky, E., and B. H. Little. 1971. “Separation and Reattachment in Transonic Airfoil Flow.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (12): 952–58. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59192
  • Stanford, Bret K. 2016a. “Optimization of an Aeroservoelastic Wing with Distributed Multiple Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (4): 1131–44. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033613
  • Stanford, Bret K. 2016b. “Static and Dynamic Aeroelastic Tailoring with Variable-Camber Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 39 (11): 2522–34. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000413
  • Stanford, Bret K. 2017. “Optimal Control Surface Layout for an Aeroservoelastic Wingbox.” AIAA Journal 55 (12): 4347–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j056070
  • Stanford, Bret K. 2019. “Gradient-Based Aeroservoelastic Optimization with Static Output Feedback.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (10): 2314–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004373
  • Stanford, Bret K., and Christine V. Jutte. 2017. “Comparison of Curvilinear Stiffeners and Tow Steered Composites for Aeroelastic Tailoring of Aircraft Wings.” Computers & Structures 183: 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.01.010
  • Stanford, Bret K., Christine V. Jutte, and Carol D. Wieseman. 2016. “Trim and Structural Optimization of Subsonic Transport Wings Using Nonconventional Aeroelastic Tailoring.” AIAA Journal 54 (1): 293–309. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j054244
  • Stark, Valter J. E. 1989. “Canard-Wing Interaction in Unsteady Supersonic Flow.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (10): 951–52. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45867
  • Staroswiecki, M., and A. Moradi Amani. 2015. “Constrained Information Pattern Reconfiguration in Fault Tolerant Control of Distributed Systems.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (21): 1303–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.705
  • Stefanello, Márcio, and Hilton A. Gründling. 2016. “Stability Analysis of a Combined Direct Variable Structure Adaptive Control – the Discrete-Time Case.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 31 (1): 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2681
  • Stefanovski, Jovan D. 2022. “Robust Stabilization under Structured, Possibly Unstable and Impulsive Uncertainties.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 32 (9): 5776–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6115
  • Steffensen, Rasmus, Agnes Steinert, and Ewoud J. J. Smeur. 2023. “Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion with Actuator Dynamics: An Incremental Control Perspective.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 46 (4): 709–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007079
  • Steger, J. L., and H. E. Bailey. 1980. “Calculation of Transonic Aileron Buzz.” AIAA Journal 18 (3): 249–55. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.50756
  • Stegmüller, Julius, Stefan Hayböck, Andreas Molz, and Christian Breitsamter. 2026. “Experimental Investigations of an Aeroelastic Wind Tunnel Model for Tail Buffeting Analysis.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (5): 1995–2010. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038577
  • Stephan, Ralph, Eike Stumpf, Henri Schottmüller, Tobias Röben, Nikolaus Dreyer, and Thomas Immler. 2023. “Methodology for Preliminary Flight Control Actuator Design.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (5): 1538–52. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036717
  • Stodieck, O., J. E. Cooper, S. A. Neild, M. H. Lowenberg, and L. Iorga. 2018. “Slender-Wing Beam Reduction Method for Gradient-Based Aeroelastic Design Optimization.” AIAA Journal 56 (11): 4529–45. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j056952
  • Stodieck, O., J. E. Cooper, P. M. Weaver, and P. Kealy. 2015. “Optimization of Tow-Steered Composite Wing Laminates for Aeroelastic Tailoring.” AIAA Journal 53 (8): 2203–15. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j053599
  • Stodieck, O., J. E. Cooper, P. M. Weaver, and P. Kealy. 2017. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Representative Wing Box Using Tow-Steered Composites.” AIAA Journal 55 (4): 1425–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j055364
  • Stollery, J. L. 1992. “High Angle of Attack Aerodynamics.” Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 54 (11–12): 1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(92)90172-h
  • Su, Weihua, Sean Shan-Min Swei, and Guoming G. Zhu. 2016. “Optimum Wing Shape of Highly Flexible Morphing Aircraft for Improved Flight Performance.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (5): 1305–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033490
  • Subramanian, Sankaranarayanan, Yehia Abdelsalam, Sergio Lucia, and Sebastian Engell. 2022. “Robust Tube-Enhanced Multi-Stage NMPC with Stability Guarantees.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 6: 1112–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2021.3089502
  • Sudhi, Anand, Rolf Radespiel, and Camli Badrya. 2023. “Design Exploration of Transonic Airfoils for Natural and Hybrid Laminar Flow Control Applications.” Journal of Aircraft 60 (3): 716–32. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036968
  • Sugimoto, Takeshi. 1992. “Wing Design for Hanggliders Having Minimum Induced Drag.” Journal of Aircraft 29 (4): 730–31. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46234
  • Sun, Mohan, Zhongzhe Chen, Xiaoling Zhang, and Huanwei Xu. 2026b. “Generative AI-Driven Inverse Design Optimization of Composite Blended-Wing-Body Aircraft under Multidisciplinary Constraints.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 69 (8): 189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-026-04375-x
  • Sun, Sihao, Coen C. de Visser, and Qiping Chu. 2019. “Quadrotor Gray-Box Model Identification from High-Speed Flight Data.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (2): 645–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035135
  • Sun, Liguo, Lewen Shi, Wenqian Tan, and Xiaoyu Liu. 2020c. “Flying Qualities Evaluation Based Nonlinear Flight Control Law Design Method for Aircraft.” Aerospace Science and Technology 106: 106126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106126
  • Sun, Bo, and Erik-Jan van Kampen. 2021. “Reinforcement-Learning-Based Adaptive Optimal Flight Control with Output Feedback and Input Constraints.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 44 (9): 1685–91. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g005715
  • Sun, Xiaozhe, Xingjian Wang, Zhiyuan Zhou, and Zhihan Zhou. 2020a. “Active Fault-Tolerant Control Strategy for More Electric Aircraft under Actuation System Failure.” Actuators 9 (4): 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/act9040122
  • Sun, Huajun, Heng Zhang, Ziyan Wei, and Jie Li. 2026a. “Aerodynamic Shape Design of Oblique Wing for Transonic/supersonic Conditions: Integrating Coupled Drag and Lateral Performance Using the Adjoint Method.” Aerospace Science and Technology 168: 110841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110841
  • Suraj, K. S., P. M. Anilkumar, C. G. Krishnanunni, and B. N. Rao. 2023. “Uncertainty Quantification of Bistable Variable Stiffness Laminate Using Machine Learning Assisted Perturbation Approach.” Composite Structures 319: 117072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117072
  • Surwase, Pradyumna Rangnath, and Prashant Kumar. 2025. “Conceptual Design of Next-Generation Stealth Fighter Aircraft Having Blended Wing Body Shape by Using Supercritical Airfoil.” Journal of Engineering and Applied Science 72 (1): 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00749-y
  • Suryawanshi, Anup, and Debraj Ghosh. 2015. “Reliability Based Optimization in Aeroelastic Stability Problems Using Polynomial Chaos Based Metamodels.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 53 (5): 1069–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1322-0
  • Svoboda, Filip, Kristian Hengster-Movric, Martin Hromčík, and Zbyněk Šika. 2023. “Decentralized Active Damping Control for Aeroelastic Morphing Wing.” Aerospace Science and Technology 139: 108415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108415
  • Swaim, Robert L. 1961. “A Note on the Effect of a Time-Varying Forward Flight Velocity on the Bending-Torsion Stability of a Supersonic Wing.” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 28 (11): 906–7. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.9241
  • Swaim, Robert L. 1970. “Minimum Control Power for VTOL Aircraft Stability Augmentation.” Journal of Aircraft 7 (3): 231–35. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44151
  • Swaim, Robert L., and Wen-Yo Yen. 1979. “Effects of Dynamic Aeroelasticity on Aircraft Handling Qualities.” Journal of Aircraft 16 (9): 635–37. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58579
  • Swain, Prasant Kumar, Balakrishna Adhikari, D. K. Maiti, and B. N. Singh. 2019. “Aeroelastic Analysis of CNT Reinforced Functionally Graded Laminated Composite Plates with Damage under Subsonic Regime.” Composite Structures 222: 110916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110916
  • Syed, Aqib A., Mojtaba Moshtaghzadeh, Dewey H. Hodges, and Pezhman Mardanpour. 2022. “Aeroelasticity of Flying-Wing Aircraft Subject to Morphing: A Stability Study.” AIAA Journal 60 (9): 5372–85. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j061574
  • Szollosi, Alexandra, and Peter Baranyi. 2016. “Improved Control Performance of the 3-DoF Aeroelastic Wing Section: A TP Model Based 2D Parametric Control Performance Optimization.” Asian Journal of Control 19 (2): 450–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1418
  • Szymanski, Jacob J., Robert Bruce Alstrom, and Juergen Rauleder. 2025. “Experimental Active Flutter Suppression Control with Inertial and Aerodynamic Feedback.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (5): 1460–66. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037978
  • Taherinezhad, Maryam, and Alejandro Ramirez-Serrano. 2023. “An Enhanced Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control Strategy for Advanced Unmanned Aircraft Systems.” Aerospace 10 (10): 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100843
  • Tahir, Muhammad Naveed, Adnan Maqsood, Muhammad Irfan Zafar, and Dan Xie. 2026. “Efficacy of Active Flow Control in Suppression of Wing Rock in Blended-Wing–Body Configurations.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (3): 885–904. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038034
  • Tai, Shang, Lixin Wang, Yanling Wang, Chen Bu, and Ting Yue. 2023a. “Flight Dynamics Modeling and Aerodynamic Parameter Identification of Four-Degree-of-Freedom Virtual Flight Test.” AIAA Journal 61 (6): 2652–65. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j062188
  • Takarics, Béla, and Bálint Vanek. 2019. “Tensor Product Model-Based Robust Flutter Control Design for the FLEXOP Aircraft.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (12): 134–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.149
  • Talreja, Ramesh, and Nam Phan. 2019. “Assessment of Damage Tolerance Approaches for Composite Aircraft with Focus on Barely Visible Impact Damage.” Composite Structures 219: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.052
  • Tamaskani, Reza, Alireza Alfi, and Vicenç Puig. 2026. “LMI-Based Robust Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Centralized Design for Flight Attitude Control.” Aerospace Science and Technology 172: 111656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.111656
  • Tameh, Tahereh Ahmadi, Mohamad Sawan, and Raman Kashyap. 2018. “Smart Integrated Optical Rotation Sensor Incorporating a Fly-by-Wire Control System.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 65 (8): 6505–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2017.2786202
  • Tang, Sam. 1972. “Stability of a Laminated Anisotropic Circular Plate.” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 9 (2): 123–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30382
  • Tang, Fei. 2025. “Delay Compensation Strategy of Networked Control System Based on Integral Sliding Mode Controller.” Journal of Control and Decision: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23307706.2025.2474671
  • Tang, Zhili, Yongbin Chen, and Lianhe Zhang. 2017b. “Natural Laminar Flow Shape Optimization in Transonic Regime with Competitive Nash Game Strategy.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 48: 534–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.04.012
  • Tang, Huaqing, and Longquan Liu. 2018. “A Novel Metal-Composite Joint and Its Structural Performance.” Composite Structures 206: 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.111
  • Tang, Zhishuai, Xianglong Tang, Ye Jin, Dansong Cheng, and Xinghua Liu. 2025. “Research on a Safety-Critical Architecture of Large Commercial Aircraft Fly-by-Wire Flight Control System.” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 36 (5): 1296–1305. https://doi.org/10.23919/jsee.2025.000136
  • Tang, Wei, Yu Wang, Jiawei Gu, and Zhiwei Sun. 2020a. “LPV Modeling and Controller Design for Body Freedom Flutter Suppression Subject to Actuator Saturation.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 33 (10): 2679–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.027
  • Tang, Wei, Jian Wu, and Zhongke Shi. 2017a. “Identification of Reduced-Order Model for an Aeroelastic System from Flutter Test Data.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 30 (1): 337–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.12.024
  • Tang, Jian, Zhigang Wu, and Chao Yang. 2015. “Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Flutter Analysis Using Evidence Theory.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 28 (1): 164–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.12.024
  • Tang, Bo, Zhigang Wu, and Chao Yang. 2016. “Aeroelastic Scaling Laws for Gust Load Alleviation Control System.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 29 (1): 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2015.12.001
  • Tanveer, Ahsan, and Sarvat Mushtaq Ahmad. 2023. “Mathematical Modelling and Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Control of a Delta Wing UAV.” Aerospace 10 (6): 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10060563
  • Tanyer, Ilker, Enver Tatlicioglu, and Erkan Zergeroglu. 2016. “Model Reference Tracking Control of an Aircraft: A Robust Adaptive Approach.” International Journal of Systems Science 48 (7): 1428–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2016.1261200
  • Tao, Gang. 2025. “Adaptive Output Tracking Control with Reference Model System Uncertainties.” Automatica 174: 112174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112174
  • Tao, Xiangyuan, Ning Li, and Shaoyuan Li. 2016. “Multiple Model Predictive Control for Large Envelope Flight of Hypersonic Vehicle Systems.” Information Sciences 328: 115–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.08.033
  • Targoff, Walter P. 1947a. “The Associated Matrices of Bending and Coupled Bending-Torsion Vibrations.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 14 (10): 579–82. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.1458
  • Targoff, Walter P. 1947b. “A Tabulation Method for the Calculation of the Critical Speed of Wing Divergence.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 14 (8): 487–88. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.1420
  • Taufik, Najwa Z. B., and Naef A. A. Qasem. 2025. “Enhancing Aerodynamics Performance: A Redesign Approach for the Forward-Swept Fixed-Wing UAV.” Transportation Research Procedia 84: 649–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.03.120
  • Teixeira, Andre M. H., Jose Araujo, Henrik Sandberg, and Karl Henrik Johansson. 2018. “Distributed Sensor and Actuator Reconfiguration for Fault-Tolerant Networked Control Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems 5 (4): 1517–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcns.2017.2732158
  • Teper, Gary L., and Robert L. Stapleford. 1966. “An Assessment of the Lateral-Disectional Handling Qualities of a Large Aircraft in the Landing Approach.” Journal of Aircraft 3 (3): 201–7. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43725
  • Thanusha, M. T., and Sunetra Sarkar. 2016. “Uncertainty Quantification of Subcritical Nonlinear Aeroelastic System Using Integrated Interpolation Method and Polynomial Chaos Expansion.” Procedia Engineering 144: 982–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.128
  • Tharp, Hal S., and William W. Zhang. 1994. “Robust Control of a Nonlinear Time-Delay System.” Dynamics and Control 4 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02115737
  • Theis, Julian, Harald Pfifer, and Peter Seiler. 2020. “Robust Modal Damping Control for Active Flutter Suppression.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (6): 1056–68. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004846
  • Theodorsen, Theodore. 1959. “Optimum Path of an Airplane – Minimum Time to Climb.” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 26 (10): 637–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.8239
  • “Thermal Damage Effects and Delamination Toughness of a Graphite/epoxy Composite.” 1989. Composites 20 (3): 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(89)90359-5
  • “Thermal Expansion and Swelling of Cured Epoxy Resin Used in Graphite/epoxy Composite Materials.” 1981. Composites 12 (2): 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(81)90491-2
  • Thien, Rebbecca T. Y., and Yoonsoo Kim. 2018. “Decentralized Formation Flight via PID and Integral Sliding Mode Control.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (23): 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.12.003
  • Thomas, Jeffrey P., and Earl H. Dowell. 2025. “Nonintrusive Polynomial Chaos Approach for Nonlinear Aeroelastic Uncertainty Quantification.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (6): 1687–97. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038249
  • Thomas, Matthew A., Stephen R. Hallett, and Paul M. Weaver. 2020. “Design Considerations for Variable Stiffness, Doubly Curved Composite Plates.” Composite Structures 244: 112170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112170
  • Thomas, James L., John W. Paulson, and Long P. Yip. 1978. “Deflected Thrust Effects on a Close-Coupled Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 15 (5): 287–92. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58357
  • Thu, Kyaw Myat, and A. I. Gavrilov. 2017. “Designing and Modeling of Quadcopter Control System Using L1 Adaptive Control.” Procedia Computer Science 103: 528–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.046
  • Tian, Zhongda. 2020. “A Method to Predict Random Time-Delay of Networked Control System.” IETE Journal of Research 68 (5): 3503–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2020.1768907
  • Tian, Yun, Shiqi Gao, Peiqing Liu, and Jinjun Wang. 2017. “Transonic Buffet Control Research with Two Types of Shock Control Bump Based on RAE2822 Airfoil.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 30 (5): 1681–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.07.011
  • Tian, Shan-shan, Liang Jin, Wei Huang, and Yang Shen. 2023. “Surrogate-Based Optimization on Bump for Shock Wave/boundary Layer Interaction Control.” Acta Astronautica 212: 139–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.08.008
  • Tian, Wei, Ergao Li, Meng Li, et al. 2026a. “Aeroelastic Suppression and Stability Tailoring Mechanism of a Nonlinear Metastructure-Integrated Supersonic Wing.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 643: 119977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2026.119977
  • Tian, Wei, Yueming Li, Ping Li, Zhichun Yang, and Tian Zhao. 2019. “Passive Control of Nonlinear Aeroelasticity in Hypersonic 3-D Wing with a Nonlinear Energy Sink.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 462: 114942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114942
  • Tian, Zhong-Da, Shu-Jiang Li, Yan-Hong Wang, and Hong-Xia Yu. 2015. “Networked Control System Time-Delay Compensation Based on Time-Delay Prediction and Improved Implicit GPC.” Algorithms 8 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/a8010003
  • Tian, Kuo, Zhiyong Sun, Tianhe Gao, and Chong Liu. 2025. “Variable-Fidelity Optimization Method with Dynamic Search Space Reduction for Variable Stiffness Composite Cylinders.” Composite Structures 370: 119355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119355
  • Tian, Wei, Yiheng Wang, Meng Li, Ergao Li, Tian Zhao, and Zhichun Yang. 2026b. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Metastructure for Wing Flutter Enhancement: Modeling, Simulation and Wind Tunnel Experiment.” Composite Structures 382: 120104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2026.120104
  • Ting, Kuang-Ying, John Berg, Mehran Mesbahi, and Eli Livne. 2026. “Aeroservoelastic Wind Tunnel Evaluation of H∞ Active Flutter Suppression.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 49 (9): 2618–34. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g009557
  • Ting, Eric, Daniel Chaparro, Nhan Nguyen, and Gustavo E. C. Fujiwara. 2018. “Optimization of Variable-Camber Continuous Trailing-Edge Flap Configuration for Drag Reduction.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (6): 2217–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034810
  • Ting, Kuang-Ying, Mehran Mesbahi, and Eli Livne. 2023. “Aeroservoelastic Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Preview H2 and H∞ Gust Load Alleviation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 46 (11): 2044–62. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007450
  • Tipàn, Steven, Spilios Theodoulis, Sovanna Thai, and Michael Proff. 2020. “Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Flight Control Design for Guided Projectiles.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (5): 975–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004976
  • Tischler, Mark B., Jay W. Fletcher, Patrick M. Morris, and George E. Tucker. 1991. “Flying Quality Analysis and Flight Evaluation of a Highly Augmented Combat Rotorcraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 14. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910067397
  • Toader, I. H. I. 1987. “A More Accurate Evaluation of Buckling Loads of Thin-Walled Members in Torsion and Torsion-Bending.” Thin-Walled Structures 5 (3): 181–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8231(87)90019-x
  • Toffol, Francesco. 2024. “A Comparative Analysis of Active Control vs. Folding Wing Tip Technologies for Gust Load Alleviation.” Applied Sciences 14 (21): 9883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219883
  • Toffol, Francesco, and Sergio Ricci. 2023. “Development of an Active Wingtip for Aeroelastic Control.” Aerospace 10 (8): 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10080693
  • Tohidi, S. S., A. Khaki Sedigh, and D. Buzorgnia. 2016. “Fault Tolerant Control Design Using Adaptive Control Allocation Based on the Pseudo Inverse along the Null Space: FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL USING ADAPTIVE CONTROL ALLOCATION.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 26 (16): 3541–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3518
  • Tokunaga, Daichi, Kazuya Masui, and Shinji Suzuki. 2015. “Flight Evaluation of Fault-Tolerant Control System Using Simple Adaptive Control Method.” Procedia Engineering 99: 1035–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.638
  • Toloei, A., and F. Ghaderi. 2026. “Reinforcement Learning–enhanced Non-Singular Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Control for Robust Formation Flight of Unmanned Helicopters.” Aerospace Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-026-00472-3
  • Tomlinson, Lloyd R. 1973. “Control System Design Considerations for a Longitudinally Unstable Supersonic Transport.” Journal of Aircraft 10 (10): 594–601. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60266
  • Tong, Junbo, Shuhan Du, and Wenhui Fan. 2025. “Ensemble Neural Network-Based Approximate Model Predictive Control with Strict Guarantees.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 35 (17): 7295–7308. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.70057
  • Tormalm, Magnus, Jean-François Le Roy, and Stephane Morgand. 2018. “Numerical Assessment of Leading- and Trailing-Edge Control on a Swept Lambda Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (2): 603–22. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033820
  • Torregrosa, A. J., A. Gil, P. Quintero, and A. Cremades. 2022. “A Reduced Order Model Based on Artificial Neural Networks for Nonlinear Aeroelastic Phenomena and Application to Composite Material Beams.” Composite Structures 295: 115845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115845
  • “Torsional Stiffness of Plastic Tubes Reinforced with Glass Fibres.” 1972. Composites 3 (2): 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(72)90404-1
  • Townsend, Scott, Renato Picelli, Bret Stanford, and H. Alicia Kim. 2018. “Structural Optimization of Platelike Aircraft Wings under Flutter and Divergence Constraints.” AIAA Journal 56 (8): 3307–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j056748
  • Tran, Anh Tuan, Noboru Sakamoto, Yoshimitsu Kikuchi, and Koichi Mori. 2017. “Pilot Induced Oscillation Suppression Controller Design via Nonlinear Optimal Output Regulation Method.” Aerospace Science and Technology 68: 278–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.010
  • Traub, Lance W. 2019. “Experimental Study of a Morphing Annular Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (6): 2376–82. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035600
  • Triplett, William E. 1972. “A Feasibility Study of Active Wing/Store Flutter Control.” Journal of Aircraft 9 (6): 438–44. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59009
  • Triplett, William E. 1980b. “Aeroelastic Tailoring Studies in Fighter Aircraft Design.” Journal of Aircraft 17 (7): 508–13. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57932
  • Triplett, William E., Thomas H. Burkhart, and Edwin B. Birchfield. 1971. “A Comparison of Methods for the Analysis of Wing-Tail Interaction Flutter.” Journal of Aircraft 8 (5): 361–67. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59109
  • Triplett, William E., Hans-Peter F. Kappus, and Robert J. Landy. 1973. “Active Flutter Control-An Adaptable Applicationto Wing/Store Flutter.” Journal of Aircraft 10 (11): 669–78. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60281
  • Tritschler, John K., and John C. O’Connor. 2016. “Use of Time-Frequency Representations for Interpreting Handling Qualities Flight Test Data.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 39 (12): 2772–79. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000401
  • Truong, Quang Huy, Thomas Rakotomamonjy, Armin Taghizad, and Jean-Marc Biannic. 2016. “Vision-Based Control for Helicopter Ship Landing with Handling Qualities Constraints.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (17): 118–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.021
  • Tsai, Ying-Kuan, and Richard J. Malak. 2024. “Surrogate-Assisted Constraint-Handling Technique for Parametric Multi-Objective Optimization.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 67 (9): 167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-024-03859-y
  • Tsiakas, Konstantinos, Xenofon Trompoukis, Varvara Asouti, et al. 2024. “Discrete and Continuous Adjoint-Based Aerostructural Wing Shape Optimization of a Business Jet.” Fluids 9 (4): 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9040087
  • Tsoutsinos, G. I. 1994. “Dual Optimal Control Problems with Time-Delay.” Systems & Control Letters 23 (5): 349–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(94)90067-1
  • Tsunematsu, Douglas Quintanilha, and Maurício Vicente Donadon. 2019. “Aeroelastic Behavior of Composite Panels Undergoing Progressive Damage.” Composite Structures 210: 458–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.065
  • Tsushima, Natsuki, Kenichi Saitoh, Hitoshi Arizono, and Kazuyuki Nakakita. 2021b. “Structural and Aeroelastic Studies of Wing Model with Metal Additive Manufacturing for Transonic Wind Tunnel Test by NACA 0008 Example.” Aerospace 8 (8): 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8080200
  • Tsushima, Natsuki, and Weihua Su. 2017. “Flutter Suppression for Highly Flexible Wings Using Passive and Active Piezoelectric Effects.” Aerospace Science and Technology 65: 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.02.013
  • Tsushima, Natsuki, Masato Tamayama, Hitoshi Arizono, and Kanjuro Makihara. 2021a. “Geometrically Nonlinear Aeroelastic Characteristics of Highly Flexible Wing Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing.” Aerospace Science and Technology 117: 106923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106923
  • Tsushima, Natsuki, Tomohiro Yokozeki, Weihua Su, and Hitoshi Arizono. 2019b. “Geometrically Nonlinear Static Aeroelastic Analysis of Composite Morphing Wing with Corrugated Structures.” Aerospace Science and Technology 88: 244–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.025
  • Tsypkin, Ya. Z., and Minyue Fu. 1993. “Robust Stability of Time-Delay Systems with an Uncertain Time-Delay Constant.” International Journal of Control 57 (4): 865–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179308934419
  • Tu, Eugene L. 1992c. “Navier-Stokes Simulation of a Close-Coupled Canard-Wing-Body Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 29 (5): 830–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46253
  • Tu, Eugene L. 1994a. “Effect of Canard Deflection on Close-Coupled Canard-Wing-Body Aerodynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (1): 138–45. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46466
  • Tu, Eugene L. 1994b. “Vortex-Wing Interaction of a Close-Coupled Canard Configuration.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (2): 314–21. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46489
  • Tu, Yifan, Linchang Lu, Bo Liu, Zihua Wen, and Changhong Wang. 2026. “Integrated Application of Barrier Function Super-Twisting Control and Single-Loop Incremental Nonlinear Dynamics Inversion on Fixed-Wing Target Attitude Tracking.” Nonlinear Dynamics 114 (7): 527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-026-12399-7
  • Tungikar, V. B., and Koganti M. Rao. 1994. “Three Dimensional Exact Solution of Thermal Stresses in Rectangular Composite Laminate.” Composite Structures 27 (4): 419–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(94)90268-2
  • Turner, C. D. 1982a. “Effect of Store Aerodynamics on Wing/Store Flutter.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (7): 574–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57431
  • Turner, C. D. 1982b. “Wing/control Surface Flutter Analysis Using Experimentally Correctedaerodynamics.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (4): 342–44. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44757
  • Twisdale, Thomas R., and Paul W. Kirsten. 1984. “Prediction and Occurrence of Pilot-Induced Oscillations in a Flight Test Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 7 (4): 410–15. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.19871
  • Urso, Elisabetta, Gaetano Giunta, and Marco Montemurro. 2026. “Concurrent Topology and Anisotropy Optimisation of Variable-Stiffness Composite Structures under Design-Dependent Loads.” Composite Structures 375: 119762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119762
  • Van Baelen, Dirk, Joost Ellerbroek, M. M. (René) van Paassen, and Max Mulder. 2020. “Design of a Haptic Feedback System for Flight Envelope Protection.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (4): 700–714. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004596
  • van Dam, Cornelis P., Bruce J. Holmes, and Calvin Pitts. 1981. “Effect of Winglets on Performance and Handling Qualities of General Aviation Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 18 (7): 587–91. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57531
  • van den Brandt, R., and C. C. de Visser. 2018. “Safe Flight Envelope Uncertainty Quantification Using Probabilistic Reachability Analysis.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (24): 628–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.641
  • van den Kieboom, Koen T. H., and Ali Elham. 2017. “Concurrent Wing and High-Lift System Aerostructural Optimization.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 57 (3): 947–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1787-0
  • van Dooren, Kevin, and Chiara Bisagni. 2024. “Post-Buckling Damage Tolerance of Welded Omega-Stiffened Thermoplastic Panels with Initial Damage.” Composite Structures 344: 118295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118295
  • Van Doren, M. L. 1955. “A Complete System for the Flight-Testing of Piloted Aircraft.” IRE Transactions on Telemetry and Remote Control TRC-1 (2): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/irettrc.1955.6538793
  • Van Tuyl, Andrew H. 1988. “Vortex Filament Model of the Wake behind a Missile at High Angle of Attack.” AIAA Journal 26 (3): 264–70. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9883
  • van Waarde, Henk J. 2022. “Beyond Persistent Excitation: Online Experiment Design for Data-Driven Modeling and Control.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 6: 319–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2021.3073860
  • Van Zyl, Louw H. 2001. “Aeroelastic Divergence and Aerodynamic Lag Roots.” Journal of Aircraft 38 (3): 586–88. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2806
  • van Zyl, Louw H., and Motodi S. Maserumule. 2001. “Unrestrained Aeroelastic Divergence and the p-k Flutter Equation.” Journal of Aircraft 38 (3): 588–90. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2808
  • Varun, Jayant Prakash, Pritam Mondal, and Prashanta K. Mahato. 2022. “Enhancement of Aeroelastic Performance of a Smart Delaminated Composite Plate under Hygrothermal Environment.” Composite Structures 292: 115662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115662
  • Vedeneev, Vasily V. 2020. “New Mechanism of the Aeroelastic Divergence Onset.” AIAA Journal 58 (6): 2716–25. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058959
  • Venkataraman, Raghu, and Peter Seiler. 2019. “Fault-Tolerant Flight Control Using One Aerodynamic Control Surface.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (3): 570–84. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003824
  • Verhaegen, Anatole, and Rafał Żbikowski. 2017. “Aeroservoelastic Modelling and Control of a Slender Anti-Air Missile for Active Damping of Longitudinal Bending Vibrations.” Aerospace Science and Technology 66: 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.03.001
  • Verma, Sumit, Miguel Cid Montoya, and Ashutosh Mishra. 2025. “Aero-Structural Design of Bridge Decks under Synoptic and Non-Synoptic Winds via Aeroelastic Surrogates Comprising Shape, Reduced Velocity, and Mean Angle of Attack.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 265: 106133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106133
  • Verri, Angelo Antonio, Flávio Luiz de Silva Bussamra, Carlos E. S. Cesnik, and Felipe Buarque Cordeiro de Melo. 2025. “Outcomes of Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity for Wing Stress and Buckling.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (2): 472–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037829
  • Vertonghen, Lander, François-Xavier Irisarri, Dimitri Bettebghor, and Boris Desmorat. 2026. “Including Strength Constraints in the Concurrent Optimization of Topology and Homogenized Laminate Stiffness.” Composite Structures 395: 120658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2026.120658
  • Vescovini, Riccardo, and Lorenzo Dozio. 2016. “A Variable-Kinematic Model for Variable Stiffness Plates: Vibration and Buckling Analysis.” Composite Structures 142: 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.068
  • Viglietti, Andrea, Enrico Zappino, and Erasmo Carrera. 2019. “High-Fidelity Vibration Analysis of Tapered Swept Tailored Composite Wing Boxes.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (2): 842–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034795
  • Vilela, Sergio Salzedas, and Maurício Vicente Donadon. 2025. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of a Skew Reinforced Composite Panel.” Thin-Walled Structures 215: 113547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2025.113547
  • Viola, Jairo, Piotr Oziablo, and YangQuan Chen. 2020. “A Study of the Influence of Stochastic Fractional-Order Delay Dynamics in a Networked Control System.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 53 (2): 5789–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1617
  • “The Viscoelastic Behaviour of the Principal Compliance Matrix of a Unidirectional Graphite/epoxy Composite.” 1981. Composites 12 (2): 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(81)90470-5
  • Volpe, Gaetano, Antonio Salcuni, Agostino Marcello Mangini, and Maria Pia Fanti. 2026. “Robust Data-Driven Safe Policy Update with Lyapunov Stability Guarantees.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 10: 1381–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2026.3704983
  • Voracek, David F., and Robert Clarke. 1994. “Buffet-Induced Structural/flight-Control System Interaction of the X-29A Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 31 (2): 441–43. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46505
  • “Voting Software for Fault-Tolerant Aircraft Flight Control Systems.” 1993. Control Engineering Practice 1 (1): 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(93)92298-i
  • Voulgaris, P. 1994. “Control of Asynchronous Sampled Data Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 39 (7): 1451–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.299632
  • Vukobratović, M., and R. Stojić. 1985. “Computer Aided Design of Aircraft Flight Control System.” IFAC Proceedings Volumes 18 (8): 371–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-6670(17)60398-7
  • Wahler, Nicolas F. M., Yiyuan Ma, and Ali Elham. 2025. “Conceptual Design and Aerostructural Trade-Offs in Hydrogen- Powered Strut-Braced Wing Aircraft: Insights into Dry and Wet Ultra-High Aspect Ratio Wings.” Aerospace 12 (2): 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12020077
  • Waitman, Sérgio, and Andrés Marcos. 2019. “Active Flutter Suppression: Non-Structured and Structured H∞ Design.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52 (12): 146–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.184
  • Waitman, Sérgio, and Andrés Marcos. 2020. “H∞ Control Design for Active Flutter Suppression of Flexible-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Demonstrator.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (4): 656–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004618
  • Wakimoto, Ken, Kazuhisa Chiba, Hiroyuki Kato, and Kazuyuki Nakakita. 2021. “Acquisition of Swept Aerodynamic Data by the Consecutive Changing of Wing Model Configuration in a Wind Tunnel Test Using Remote Feedback Control.” Aerospace 8 (8): 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8080217
  • Walker, Joel R., and David Claudio. 2024. “Machine Learning Opportunities in Flight Test: Preflight Checks.” SN Computer Science 5 (5): 569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-02874-6
  • Wang, Dong. 2021. “Effects of Design Sensitivity Schemes for Incorporating Loading Uncertainty in Robust Topology Optimization.” Engineering Optimization 55 (2): 344–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2021.2004136
  • Wang, J., A. Baker, and P. Chang. 2019b. “Hybrid Approaches for Aircraft Primary Structure Repairs.” Composite Structures 207: 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.038
  • Wang, Zhanxi, Hang Chen, Gang Wang, Yiming Zhang, and Chen Zheng. 2021g. “Prediction and Active Suppression of Flutter in Composite Panel Based on Eigenvector Orientation Method.” Composite Structures 262: 113422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113422
  • Wang, Xuan, Bing Chu, and Eric Rogers. 2017a. “Higher-Order Iterative Learning Control Law Design Using Linear Repetitive Process Theory: Convergence and Robustness.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 50 (1): 3123–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.320
  • Wang, Yongzhi, Andrea Da Ronch, and Maryam Ghandchi Tehrani. 2018a. “Adaptive Feedforward Control for Gust-Induced Aeroelastic Vibrations.” Aerospace 5 (3): 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5030086
  • Wang, Wei, He Feng, Shenao Cui, and Zhandong Li. 2025g. “Multi-Objective Optimization of Transonic Variable Camber Airfoil with Leading- and Trailing-Edge Deflections Using Kriging Surrogate Model.” Aerospace 12 (8): 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080659
  • Wang, ChengYue, Qi Gao, RunJie Wei, Tian Li, and JinJun Wang. 2016a. “3D Flow Visualization and Tomographic Particle Image Velocimetry for Vortex Breakdown over a Non-Slender Delta Wing.” Experiments in Fluids 57 (6): 98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2184-y
  • Wang, Chenliang, and Lei Guo. 2015. “Adaptive Compensation for Infinite Number of Actuator Failures with an Application to Flight Control.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 30 (3): 443–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2585
  • Wang, Yanfeng, Yuqin Hou, and Peiliang Wang. 2022f. “Dynamic Event-Triggered Fault Detection for Discrete Networked Control System with Time-Delay.” IEEE Access 10: 109108–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3213938
  • Wang, Xiaoming, Xinhan Hu, Enmei Wang, and Wenya Zhou. 2026f. “Longitudinal Flight Performance Improvement Strategy for High-Altitude Long-Endurance Flexible Aircraft: Mass-Actuated Aeroelastic Control.” Aerospace Science and Technology 168: 111272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.111272
  • Wang, Yeping, Honglei Ji, Linghai Lu, and Pan Zhou. 2025f. “Modeling Multirotor Wake Interference in Quadrotor eVTOL Flight Dynamics and Handling Qualities.” Aerospace Science and Technology 165: 110533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110533
  • Wang, Xuerui, Erik-Jan van Kampen, Qiping Chu, and Peng Lu. 2019c. “Incremental Sliding-Mode Fault-Tolerant Flight Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (2): 244–59. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003497
  • Wang, Huanqing, and Muxuan Li. 2025. “Adaptive Fuzzy Nonsingular Fixed-Time Safety Flight Containment Control for Multi-UAVs.” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 61 (1): 802–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2024.3448398
  • Wang, Jianfeng, Jun Li, Yuze Liu, et al. 2026c. “Design and Wind Tunnel Test of Control Laws for High Angle of Attack Flight of Low-Aspect-Ratio Flying-Wing UAVs Based on NDI.” Drones 10 (8): 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10080601
  • Wang, Zixu, Pan Li, Zhenhua Zhu, Renliang Chen, and Junbiao Shen. 2025a. “Control Allocation Design for Equal Control Sensitivity of Tiltrotor Aircraft.” Aerospace Science and Technology 161: 110134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110134
  • Wang, Fan, Jinling Liang, and Feng Wang. 2016d. “Optimal Control for Discrete-Time Singular Stochastic Systems with Input Delay.” Optimal Control Applications and Methods 37 (6): 1282–1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2237
  • Wang, Hongxia, Tao Liu, Zixing Li, and Xiao Liang. 2024b. “Optimal Control for Networked Control System with Markovian Packet Loss and Delay.” Asian Journal of Control 26 (6): 3162–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.3395
  • Wang, Zhijun, Vanessa Q. Liu Xu, and Roeland De Breuker. 2025j. “Preliminary Aeroelastic Optimization of Electric Aircraft Wings Including Propeller Whirl Flutter Effects.” Aerospace Science and Technology 157: 109813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109813
  • Wang, Lixin, Chang Lu, Tao Jin, Hailiang Liu, and Ting Yue. 2023a. “Suggestions for Criteria to Evaluate Lateral-Directional Nonlinear Pilot-Induced Oscillations Due to Fly-by-Wire Civil Aircraft Landing Configuration Switch.” Aerospace 10 (9): 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10090799
  • Wang, Lixin, Chang Lu, Hailiang Liu, and Ting Yue. 2021d. “Method of Predicting Nonlinear Pilot-Induced Oscillations Due to Flight Control Degradation Based on Digital Virtual Flight.” Aerospace Science and Technology 116: 106871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106871
  • Wang, Hao, Zhenbing Luo, Xiong Deng, and Yi Deng. 2025i. “Numerical Investigation of Vortex Dynamics Control in the Delta Wing Using Dual Synthetic Jets.” Aerospace Science and Technology 164: 110369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110369
  • Wang, Hao, Zhenbing Luo, Xiong Deng, Yan Zhou, and Jianyu Gong. 2025b. “Enhancement of Flying Wing Aerodynamics in Crossflow at High Angle of Attack Using Dual Synthetic Jets.” Aerospace Science and Technology 156: 109773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109773
  • Wang, Hao, Zhenbing Luo, Xiong Deng, Yan Zhou, Zhijie Zhao, and Jianyuan Zhang. 2025h. “Novel Control Method of Vortex Breakdown over Delta Wing Using Dual Synthetic Jets.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 38 (5): 103327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.103327
  • Wang, Nianhua, Rong Ma, Xinghua Chang, and Laiping Zhang. 2021f. “Numerical Virtual Flight Simulation of Quasi-Cobra Maneuver of a Fighter Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (1): 138–52. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035687
  • Wang, Xuerui, Tigran Mkhoyan, Iren Mkhoyan, and Roeland De Breuker. 2021i. “Seamless Active Morphing Wing Simultaneous Gust and Maneuver Load Alleviation.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 44 (9): 1649–62. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g005870
  • Wang, Ling, and Bo Song. 2025. “Design and Additive Manufacturing of Metamaterial – Enabling Structure-Driven Material Properties.” Additive Manufacturing Frontiers 4 (1): 200202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amf.2025.200202
  • Wang, Yiqing, Mingming Song, Ao Wang, and Limin Sun. 2024d. “Structural Dynamic Response Reconstruction Based on Recurrent Neural Network–Aided Kalman Filter.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2024 (1): 7481513. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7481513
  • Wang, Lixin, Xun Sun, Hailiang Liu, et al. 2024c. “Sliding Mode Flight Control Law Design Requirements for Oblique Wing Aircraft Based on Perturbation Theory.” Aerospace 11 (5): 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11050366
  • Wang, Xuerui, Bo Sun, Jurij Sodja, and Erik-Jan van Kampen. 2025c. “Event-Triggered Adaptive Dynamic Programming for an Aeroservoelastic System: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 48 (12): 2899–2907. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g009257
  • Wang, Lixin, Shang Tai, Ting Yue, Hailiang Liu, Yanling Wang, and Chen Bu. 2022g. “Longitudinal Aerodynamic Parameter Identification for Blended-Wing-Body Aircraft Based on a Wind Tunnel Virtual Flight Test.” Aerospace 9 (11): 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9110689
  • Wang, C. M., and V. Thevendran. 1993. “Vibration Analysis of Annular Plates with Concentric Supports Using a Variant of Rayleigh-Ritz Method.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 163 (1): 137–49. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1993.1153
  • Wang, Lei, Kangqi Tian, and Zhenxian Luo. 2025l. “Sequential-Based Non-Probabilistic Reliability Optimization for Composite Aircraft Wing Considering Aero-Structural Coupling Constraints.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 446: 118323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.118323
  • Wang, X., E. Van Kampen, Q. P. Chu, and Roeland De Breuker. 2019a. “Flexible Aircraft Gust Load Alleviation with Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (7): 1519–36. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003980
  • Wang, Xuerui, Erik-Jan van Kampen, Qiping Chu, and Peng Lu. 2019d. “Stability Analysis for Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (5): 1116–29. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003791
  • Wang, Zexi, Zhiqiang Wan, Rainer M. J. Groh, and Xiaozhe Wang. 2021a. “Aeroelastic and Local Buckling Optimisation of a Variable-Angle-Tow Composite Wing-Box Structure.” Composite Structures 258: 113201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113201
  • Wang, Kai, Xiaoguang Wang, Xiujie Han, et al. 2025e. “Global Aero-Structural Optimization of Composite Forward-Swept Wings Considering Natural Laminar Flow.” Aerospace 12 (12): 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12121076
  • Wang, Kai, Xiaoping Wang, and Xianfeng Wang. 2025d. “A General Numerical Method for the Design of Multi-Ply Variable Stiffness Trajectories of Composite Laminated Shells.” Composite Structures 373: 119590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119590
  • Wang, Gang, Zhenhong Wei, Zongyu Zuo, Hefeng Zhan, and Peng Li. 2026a. “Adaptive Augmentation of Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Microquadrotor Aerobatic Flight Control.” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 62: 6225–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2026.3663140
  • Wang, Xiaoguang, Chen Weng, and Wenzhao Dong. 2026d. “High-Angle-of-Attack Maneuver Flight Control Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning and Transfer Strategies.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 179: 115261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2026.115261
  • Wang, Jianmin, Yunjie Wu, and Xiaomeng Dong. 2015. “Recursive Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Hypersonic Flight Vehicle with Sliding Mode Disturbance Observer.” Nonlinear Dynamics 81 (3): 1489–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2083-4
  • Wang, Xiangyu, Zhigang Wu, Yukai Sun, and Chao Yang. 2021e. “A Novel Method for Estimating Three-Domain Limit Cycles in a 3D Wing-Aileron Model with Freeplay in Aileron Deflection.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 105: 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103286
  • Wang, Yinan, Andrew Wynn, and Rafael Palacios. 2018b. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Control of Very Flexible Aircraft Using Model Updating.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (4): 1551–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034684
  • Wang, Weiming, and Yi Xia. 2022. “Topology Optimization Based Channel Design for Powder-Bed Additive Manufacturing.” Additive Manufacturing 54: 102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102717
  • Wang, Yizhe, and Zhiwei Xu. 2018. “Adaptive Feedforward Compensating Self-Sensing Method for Active Flutter Suppression.” Sensors 18 (10): 3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103447
  • Wang, Lixin, Zijian Xu, and Ting Yue. 2016b. “Dynamic Characteristics Analysis and Flight Control Design for Oblique Wing Aircraft.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 29 (6): 1664–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.10.010
  • Wang, Weixin, Yang Yi, Xiang Yu, Rui Cao, Jianzhong Qiao, and Lei Guo. 2026b. “Conditional Disturbance Utilization-Based Intelligent Morphing and Flight Control for Morphing Aircraft Using Reinforcement Learning.” Science China Technological Sciences 69 (5): 1520302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-025-3198-1
  • Wang, Jinjun, Jingxia Zhan, Wang Zhang, and Zhe Wu. 2006. “Application of Gurney Flap on a Simplified Forward-Swept Aircraft Model.” Journal of Aircraft 43 (5): 1561–64. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.20283
  • Wang, Yitao, Teng Zhang, Yuting He, Jiyuan Ye, Hanzhe Zhang, and Xianghong Fan. 2022e. “Analysis of Damage of Typical Composite/Metal Connecting Structure in Aircraft under the Influences of High-Velocity Fragments.” Applied Sciences 12 (18): 9268. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189268
  • Wang, Zhiping, Yicha Zhang, Shujie Tan, Liping Ding, and Alain Bernard. 2021j. “Support Point Determination for Support Structure Design in Additive Manufacturing.” Additive Manufacturing 47: 102341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102341
  • Wang, Xiaozhe, Shanshan Zhang, Zhiqiang Wan, and Zhi Wang. 2022b. “Aeroelastic Topology Optimization of Wing Structure Based on Moving Boundary Meshfree Method.” Symmetry 14 (6): 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061154
  • Wang, Lixin, Ning Zhang, Ting Yue, Hailiang Liu, Jianghui Zhu, and Xiaopeng Jia. 2020b. “Three-Axis Coupled Flight Control Law Design for Flying Wing Aircraft Using Eigenstructure Assignment Method.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 33 (10): 2510–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.03.016
  • Wang, Yinan, Xiaowei Zhao, Rafael Palacios, and Keisuke Otsuka. 2022a. “Aeroelastic Simulation of High-Aspect Ratio Wings with Intermittent Leading-Edge Separation.” AIAA Journal 60 (3): 1769–82. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j060909
  • Wang, Lixin, Rong Zhao, and Yi Zhang. 2022d. “Aircraft Lateral-Directional Aerodynamic Parameter Identification and Solution Method Using Segmented Adaptation of Identification Model and Flight Test Data.” Aerospace 9 (8): 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9080433
  • Wang, Yu, and Li Zhou. 2026. “Flutter Boundary Prediction Based on Feature Extraction and Bayesian Optimization Transformer–Long Short-Term Memory.” Journal of Aircraft: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038983
  • Wang, Fang, Chao Zhou, and Changchun Hua. 2024a. “Adaptive Predefined Time Neural Filtered Control Design for an Uncertain Nonlinear System and Application to Flight Control.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 129: 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2024.01.044
  • Wang, Wei, Xiaoping Zhu, Zhou Zhou, and Jingbo Duan. 2016c. “A Method for Nonlinear Aeroelasticity Trim and Stability Analysis of Very Flexible Aircraft Based on Co-Rotational Theory.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 62: 209–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.01.009
  • Wang, Xiangyang, Bin Zhu, Jihong Zhu, and Zhiqiang Cheng. 2020c. “Thrust Vectoring Control of Vertical/short Takeoff and Landing Aircraft.” Science China Information Sciences 63 (2): 124202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9795-y
  • Wansasueb, Kittinan, Natee Panagant, Sujin Bureerat, Numchoak Sabangban, and Nantiwat Pholdee. 2023. “Comparative Study of Recent Metaheuristics for Solving a Multiobjective Transonic Aeroelastic Optimization of a Composite Wing.” Acta Mechanica 235 (1): 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03756-3
  • Wasson, H. R., and T. E. Mehus. 1967. “A Segmented Wing Test Technique for Obtaining Spanwise Load Distributions.” Journal of Aircraft 4 (4): 327–32. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43843
  • Webb, Kevin, and Jonathan Rogers. 2021. “Adaptive Control Design for Multi-UAV Cooperative Lift Systems.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (6): 1302–22. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036206
  • Wei, Qingkai, Bao Chen, and Xun Huang. 2017. “Comment on “Roll Control Using Only Synthetic Jet Actuators at High Angle of Attack”.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (3): 1238–39. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034079
  • Wei, Lan, and Nikolaos M. Freris. 2024. “Multi-Scale Graph Neural Network for Physics-Informed Fluid Simulation.” Visual Computer 41 (2): 1171–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-024-03402-6
  • Wei, Chuyu, Deyuan Meng, Jingyao Zhang, and Kaiquan Cai. 2024. “Data-Based Nonlinear Learning Control for Aircraft Trajectory Tracking via Gaussian Process Regression.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 34 (15): 10480–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.7526
  • Wei, Yang, Haojun Xu, and Yuan Xue. 2020. “Adaptive Neural Networks-Based Dynamic Inversion Applied to Reconfigurable Flight Control and Envelope Protection under Icing Conditions.” IEEE Access 8: 11577–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2964728
  • Weihs, D., and J. Katz. 1986. “Transient Induced Drag.” AIAA Journal 24 (7): 1203–5. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9418
  • Weiser, Christian, Daniel Ossmann, and Gertjan Looye. 2020. “Design and Flight Test of a Linear Parameter Varying Flight Controller.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 11 (4): 955–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-020-00461-y
  • Weissenberger, Stein. 1969. “Lyapunov Design of Time-Shared Sampled-Data Control Systems.” International Journal of Control 9 (2): 205–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207176908905741
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A. 1977. “Lateral Equilibrium of Asymmetrical Swept Wings: Aileron Control Vsgeometric Twist.” Journal of Aircraft 14 (2): 122–27. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44579
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A. 1980. “Of Forward Swept Composite Wings Divergence.” Journal of Aircraft 17 (6): 442–48. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57922
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A. 1981. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of Forward Swept Composite Wings.” Journal of Aircraft 18 (8): 669–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57542
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A. 1985. “Comment on ‘Generic Approach to Determine Optimum Aeroelastic Characteristics for Composite Forward-Swept-Wing Aircraft’.” AIAA Journal 23 (6): 978–79. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48607
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A., and Steven M. Ehlers. 1992. “Adaptive Aeroelastic Composite Wings: Control and Optimization Issues.” Composites Engineering 2 (7-May). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930030821
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A., and Rosemary J. Ryan. 1986. “Control of Aeroelastic Instabilities through Stiffness Cross-Coupling.” Journal of Aircraft 23 (2): 148–55. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45282
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A., and Thomas A. Zeiler. 1983. “Dynamic Stability of Flexible Forward Swept Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (12): 1014–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48205
  • Well, K. H., and E. Berger. 1982. “Minimum-Time 180� Turns of Aircraft.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 38 (1): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00934324
  • Wen, Jiayu, Yanguo Song, Huanjin Wang, Dong Han, and Changfa Yang. 2023. “Hybrid Adaptive Control for Tiltrotor Aircraft Flight Control Law Reconfiguration.” Aerospace 10 (12): 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10121001
  • Werdes, R. J. 1953. “Note on the Use of Two-Dimensional Compressible Flow Aerodynamic Coefficients in the Flutter Analysis of a Tapered Wing.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 20 (6): 434–35. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2666
  • Werter, N. P. M., and R. De Breuker. 2016. “A Novel Dynamic Aeroelastic Framework for Aeroelastic Tailoring and Structural Optimisation.” Composite Structures 158: 369–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.044
  • Westin, Michelle F., Jose M. Balthazar, Roberto G. A. da Silva, Mauricio A. Ribeiro, and Angelo M. Tusset. 2023. “Characterization of Aeroelastic Behavior in a High Aspect Ratio Wing Using Computational and Wind Tunnel Experiments.” Axioms 12 (9): 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12090826
  • Wheatcroft, Ed D., Yusuf Mahadik, Rainer M. J. Groh, Alberto Pirrera, and Mark Schenk. 2025b. “Wind Tunnel Testing of a Passive Gust Load Alleviation Spoiler.” AIAA Journal 63 (10): 4156–69. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j065343
  • White, Trent, and Darren Hartl. 2025. “A Data-Driven Modeling Framework for Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 439: 117911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.117911
  • White, Mark D., Gareth D. Padfield, Linghai Lu, Sunjoo Advani, and Mario Potter. 2021. “Review of Flight Simulation Fidelity Requirements to Help Reduce ‘Rotorcraft Loss of Control in-Flight’ Accident Rates.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 12 (4): 701–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-021-00542-6
  • Wie, Bong, and Kuk-Whan Byun. 1989. “New Generalized Structural Filtering Concept for Active Vibration Control Synthesis.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 12 (2): 147–54. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20384
  • Wilhelm, Knut, and Dieter Schafranek. 1986. “Landing Approach Handling Qualities of Transport Aircraft with Relaxed Static Stability.” Journal of Aircraft 23 (10): 756–62. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45377
  • Williams, M. L. 1952. “A Review of Certain Analysis Methods for Swept-Wing Structures.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 19 (9): 615–29. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2400
  • Williams, M. H. 1980. “Unsteady Thin Airfoil Theory for Transonic Flows with Embedded Shocks.” AIAA Journal 18 (6): 615–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.50797
  • Wilson, Callum, and Annalisa Riccardi. 2022. “Enabling Intelligent Onboard Guidance, Navigation, and Control Using Reinforcement Learning on near-Term Flight Hardware.” Acta Astronautica 199: 374–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.013
  • Wollner, Bertram C. 1972. “Methodology for Structural Optimization of STOL Aircraft Vertical Stabilizers.” Journal of Aircraft 9 (5): 360–64. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58993
  • Wood, Kieran T., Sergio Araujo-Estrada, Thomas Richardson, and Shane Windsor. 2019. “Distributed Pressure Sensing–Based Flight Control for Small Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Systems.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (5): 1951–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035416
  • Wood, R. M., and D. S. Miller. 1985. “Fundamental Aerodynamic Characteristics of Delta Wings with Leading-Edge Vortex Flows.” Journal of Aircraft 22. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850053430
  • Woods, Benjamin K. S., Iman Dayyani, and Michael I. Friswell. 2015. “Fluid/Structure-Interaction Analysis of the Fish-Bone-Active-Camber Morphing Concept.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (1): 307–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c032725
  • Woods, Jessica A., Michael G. Gilbert, and Terrence A. Weisshaar. 1990. “Parametric Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of a Generic X-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 27 (7): 653–59. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25336
  • Wu, Dawei, Mou Chen, and Huajun Gong. 2017b. “Robust Control of Post-Stall Pitching Maneuver Based on Finite-Time Observer.” ISA Transactions 70: 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2017.06.015
  • Wu, Dawei, Mou Chen, and Hui Ye. 2020. “High Angle of Attack Flight Control Based on Switched Prescribed Performance.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 34 (8): 1059–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3119
  • Wu, T.-T., and S.-T. Chiu. 1992. “On the Propagation of Horizontally Polarized Shear Waves in a Thin Composite Laminate Plate.” Ultrasonics 30 (1): 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624x(92)90034-j
  • Wu, Yanxuan, Yifan Fu, Hao Li, Xudong Luo, and Haonan Sun. 2025b. “Optimal Control of a Small Flexible Aircraft Using an Active Gust Alleviation Device.” Mathematics 13 (24): 3986. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13243986
  • Wu, Chao, Andrew J. Gunnion, Bernard Chen, and Wenyi Yan. 2015. “Fatigue Damage Tolerance of Two Tapered Composite Patch Configurations.” Composite Structures 134: 654–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.114
  • Wu, Linfeng, Huanyu Li, Yingjie Li, and Chunwen Li. 2019. “Position Tracking Control of Tailsitter VTOL UAV with Bounded Thrust-Vectoring Propulsion System.” IEEE Access 7: 137054–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2942526
  • Wu, Sang, and Eli Livne. 2016. “Probabilistic Aeroservoelastic Reliability Assessment Considering Control System Component Uncertainty.” AIAA Journal 54 (8): 2507–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j054824
  • Wu, Sang, and Eli Livne. 2017. “Alternative Aerodynamic Uncertainty Modeling Approaches for Flutter Reliability Analysis.” AIAA Journal 55 (8): 2808–23. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j055334
  • Wu, Dawei, Yonghui Sun, and Xiaohui Yan. 2021a. “Adaptive Neural Tracking Control for High Angle of Attack Maneuver with Average Dwell Time.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 35 (12): 2446–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3331
  • Wu, Qianjing, Yilong Wang, and Dengqing Cao. 2025a. “Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of High Aspect Ratio Wings via IHB Method.” Nonlinear Dynamics 113 (13): 16225–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-10975-x
  • Wu, Mingjian, Tianhang Xiao, Haisong Ang, and Hongda Li. 2017a. “Investigation of a Morphing Wing Solar-Powered Unmanned Aircraft with Enlarged Flight Latitude.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (5): 1996–2004. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034356
  • Wu, Xinyi, and Zhiwei Xu. 2023. “Binocular Vision Monitoring Method Research of Wing Sweep Angles for Morphing Aircraft in Complex Climate Environments.” Measurement 218: 113214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113214
  • Wu, Zeliang, Jianchuan Ye, Tao Song, Tao Jiang, and Xiaojie Su. 2024. “Aggressive Flight Control of Quadrotors Using Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion with a High-Fidelity Thrust Unit Model.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 361 (10): 106914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2024.106914
  • Wu, Di, Weijian Zhang, Haibo Du, and Xiangyu Wang. 2021b. “Robust Adaptive Finite-Time Trajectory Tracking Control of a Quadrotor Aircraft.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 31 (16): 8030–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.5743
  • Wu, Xiaojing, Zijun Zuo, and Long Ma. 2022. “Aerodynamic Data-Driven Surrogate-Assisted Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) Framework for Constrained Transonic Airfoil and Wing Shape Designs.” Aerospace 9 (10): 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9100610
  • Wunderlich, Tobias F. 2015. “Multidisciplinary Wing Optimization of Commercial Aircraft with Consideration of Static Aeroelasticity.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 6 (3): 407–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-015-0151-6
  • Wunderlich, Tobias, and Sascha Dähne. 2017. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of an NLF Forward Swept Wing: DLR Contribution to LuFo IV Joint Research Project AeroStruct.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 8 (3): 461–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-017-0251-6
  • Wunderlich, Tobias, Sascha Dähne, Lars Heinrich, and Lars Reimer. 2017. “Multidisciplinary Optimization of an NLF Forward Swept Wing in Combination with Aeroelastic Tailoring Using CFRP: DLR Contribution to the LuFo IV Joint Research Project AeroStruct.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 8 (4): 673–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-017-0266-z
  • Wunderlich, Tobias F., Sascha Dähne, Lars Reimer, and Andreas Schuster. 2021. “Global Aerostructural Design Optimization of More Flexible Wings for Commercial Aircraft.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (6): 1254–71. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c036301
  • Wunderlich, T. F., S. Dähne, L. Reimer, and A. Schuster. 2022. “Global Aero-Structural Design Optimization of Composite Wings with Active Manoeuvre Load Alleviation.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 13 (3): 639–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-022-00585-3
  • Xia, Chenchao, and Weifang Chen. 2015. “Gradient-Based Aerothermodynamic Optimization of a Hypersonic Wing Profile.” Procedia Engineering 126: 189–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.214
  • Xiao, Shuyi, and Jiuxiang Dong. 2019. “Output Feedback Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Compensation Tracking Control for Linear Systems Based on the Closed-Loop Reference Model.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 34 (1): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3069
  • Xiao, Zhaofei, and Philip Harrison. 2021. “Design of Buckling and Damage Resistant Steered Fibre Composite Laminates Using Trellis Shear Kinematics.” Composite Structures 260: 113526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113526
  • Xiao, Guannan, and Fei Liu. 2018. “System Reconfiguration and Fault-Tolerant for Distributed Model Predictive Control Using Parameterized Network Topology.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (18): 524–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.371
  • Xie, Hanqi, Shujie Zhang, Yizhang Yang, Yang Zhou, and Hongxiao Zhao. 2025. “Design of Variable-Stiffness Bistable Composite Laminates and Their Application in Variable-Camber Wings.” Aerospace 12 (6): 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12060525
  • Xie, Jing, and Jun Zhao. 2016. “Model Reference Adaptive Control for Nonlinear Switched Systems under Asynchronous Switching.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 31 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2666
  • Xijuan, Guo, Zhao Qiang, and Fengfeng Xi. 2016. “Design Segmented Stiff Skin for a Morphing Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (4): 962–70. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033252
  • Xiong, Yuhang, Wei Tang, Xiping Kou, Yan Li, and Songlin He. 2026a. “Aeroservoelastic Modeling, Control, and Optimization of Slender Antiaircraft Missiles with Respect to Bending Vibrations.” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 62: 9469–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2026.3683617
  • Xiong, Zijian, Yuanming Xu, Deyuan Liu, and Xuechao Pian. 2026b. “Robust Cascaded Control with Antisaturation for Fixed-Wing Trajectory Tracking.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (5): 1975–88. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038510
  • Xu, Bin, Yonghua Fan, and Shangmin Zhang. 2015c. “Minimal-Learning-Parameter Technique Based Adaptive Neural Control of Hypersonic Flight Dynamics without Back-Stepping.” Neurocomputing 164: 201–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.02.069
  • Xu, Buxian, and Lihao Feng. 2025. “Experimental Research on Three-Axis Control of Flying-Wing Aircraft Based on Active Flow Control.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 38 (8): 103443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2025.103443
  • Xu, Xingzhi, Yakui Gao, and Weiguo Zhang. 2015a. “Aeroelastic Dynamic Response and Control of an Aeroelastic System with Hysteresis Nonlinearities.” Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2015: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/258315
  • Xu, Bin, Yuyan Guo, Yuan Yuan, Yonghua Fan, and Danwei Wang. 2015b. “Fault-Tolerant Control Using Command-Filtered Adaptive Back-Stepping Technique: Application to Hypersonic Longitudinal Flight Dynamics.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 30 (4): 553–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2596
  • Xu, Zhaoyi, Joseph H. Saleh, and Vigor Yang. 2019b. “Optimization of Supercritical Airfoil Design with Buffet Effect.” AIAA Journal 57 (10): 4343–53. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j057573
  • Xu, Shuting, Wenqian Tan, Xiangju Qu, and Cheng Zhang. 2019c. “Prediction of Nonlinear Pilot-Induced Oscillation Using an Intelligent Human Pilot Model.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 32 (12): 2592–2611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.06.003
  • Xu, Zhaoke, and Jian Xia. 2016. “Aerodynamic Optimization Based on Continuous Adjoint Method for a Flexible Wing.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2016: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4706925
  • Xu, Kewei, and Gecheng Zha. 2021. “High Control Authority Three-Dimensional Aircraft Control Surfaces Using Coflow Jet.” Journal of Aircraft 58 (1): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035727
  • Xu, Yifan, Qian Zhang, and Zelong Yu. 2020. “An Innovative Control Allocation Framework for a Novel Tiltrotor Aircraft.” IEEE Access 8: 219788–219801. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3041855
  • Xu, Shangru, Jifa Zhang, Yao Zheng, and Yaolong Liu. 2026a. “Bayesian Optimization Framework for Mixed-Variable Wing Structural Design and Optimization of Tilt-Duct Aircraft.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 69 (7): 172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-026-04374-y
  • Xue, Rongrong, Zhengyin Ye, and Kun Ye. 2019. “Active Aeroelastic Wing Application on a Forward Swept Wing Configuration.” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 13 (1): 1063–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2019.1663264
  • Yagil, Leeran, Daniella E. Raveh, and Moshe Idan. 2018. “Deformation Control of Highly Flexible Aircraft in Trimmed Flight and Gust Encounter.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (2): 829–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034353
  • Yahagi, Takashi. 1971. “Optimum Design of Linear Multivariate Sampled-Data Control Systems.” International Journal of Control 14 (3): 581–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207177108932066
  • Yamamoto, Yuzo. 1992. “Induced Drag of a Wing in a Circular Wind Tunnel.” AIAA Journal 30 (9): 2344–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11227
  • Yamasaki, Hiroshi, and Bogdan I. Epureanu. 2017. “Forecasting Supercritical and Subcritical Hopf Bifurcations in Aeroelastic Systems.” International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 94: 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2016.12.009
  • Yang, Janghoon. 2024. “Channel Switching Algorithms for a Robust Networked Control System with a Delay and Packet Errors.” Electronics 13 (2): 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13020308
  • Yang, Xing, Bin Fu, Xiaochuan Ma, Yu Liu, Dongyu Yuan, and Xintong Wu. 2024a. “Asynchronously H∞ Tracking Control and Optimization for Switched Flight Vehicles with Time-Varying Delay.” Aerospace 11 (2): 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11020107
  • Yang, Yuanchao, and Zichen Gao. 2020. “A New Method for Control Allocation of Aircraft Flight Control System.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 65 (4): 1413–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2019.2918122
  • Yang, Hao, Yacun Guan, Yajie Ma, and Bin Jiang. 2018. “Overlapping-Decomposition-Based Control Design for Switched Full-Envelope Flight.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 41 (12): 2658–65. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003586
  • Yang, Zhijun, Rui Huang, Yonghui Zhao, and Haiyan Hu. 2017. “Design of an Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Transonic Flutter Suppression.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (11): 2905–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g002690
  • Yang, Zhijun, Rui Huang, Yonghui Zhao, and Haiyan Hu. 2019c. “Transonic Flutter Suppression for a Three-Dimensional Elastic Wing via Active Disturbance Rejection Control.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 445: 168–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.01.006
  • Yang, Inseok, Dongik Lee, and Dong Seog Han. 2015b. “Reconfiguration Criterion for Fault-Tolerant Control.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2015: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/218384
  • Yang, Aobo, Jichao Li, and Rhea P. Liem. 2026a. “Generalizable Multifidelity Aerodynamic Wing Shape Design Optimization.” Journal of Aircraft 63 (5): 2139–55. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038587
  • Yang, T. Y., A. G. Striz, and P. Guruswamy. 1981. “Flutter Analysis of MBB a-3 Supercritical Airfoil in Small Disturbance Transonic Flow.” Journal of Aircraft 18 (10): 887–90. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57576
  • Yang, Yunjia, Weishao Tang, Mengxin Liu, Nils Thuerey, Yufei Zhang, and Haixin Chen. 2026c. “SuperWing: A Comprehensive Transonic Wing Dataset for Data-Driven Aerodynamic Design.” Scientific Data 13 (1): 1113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-07769-0
  • Yang, Haocheng, Peng Wang, and Guojian Tang. 2026b. “Physics-Informed Reinforcement Learning Based Control for High-Speed Morphing Aircraft.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics: 104412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2026.104412
  • Yang, Lin, Xia Wang, and Bin Xu. 2025a. “Robust Intelligent Control of Aircraft at High Angle of Attack Maneuvers Using Monitoring Mechanism.” Journal of Control and Decision 13 (1): 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/23307706.2025.2486673
  • Yang, Fan, Hong Xiao, Guang Yang, Hongwei Guo, Rongqiang Liu, and Zongquan Deng. 2024c. “Large Deflection Model and Optimal Design for a Morphing Wing Leading-Edge Skin.” Journal of Aircraft 61 (3): 684–94. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037399
  • Yang, Shizhuo, Peng Xu, and Bing Li. 2024b. “Design and Rigid-Flexible Dynamic Analysis of a Morphing Wing Eight-Bar Mechanism.” Nonlinear Dynamics 112 (17): 15025–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-09764-9
  • Yang, Weiqi, Hui Yang, and Shuo Tang. 2019b. “Optimization and Control Application of Sensor Placement in Aeroservoelastic of UAV.” Aerospace Science and Technology 85: 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.050
  • Yang, Weizhu, Zhufeng Yue, Lei Li, and Peiyan Wang. 2015a. “Aircraft Wing Structural Design Optimization Based on Automated Finite Element Modelling and Ground Structure Approach.” Engineering Optimization 48 (1): 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2014.995175
  • Yang, Huitao, Yu Zhang, Jingwen Zhu, and Shanshan Hong. 2023. “Impulsive Control of Unstable Homogeneous Positive Systems of Degree One with Unbounded Time-Varying Delay.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 34 (2): 1257–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.7026
  • Yang, Zhi-Chun, and Ling-Cheng Zhao. 1989. “Wing-Store Flutter Analysis of an Airfoil in Incompressible Flow.” Journal of Aircraft 26 (6): 583–87. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45806
  • Yang, Yi-Ren, and Ling-Cheng Zhao. 1992. “Subharmonic Bifurcation Analysis of Wing with Store Flutter.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 157 (3): 477–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(92)90528-6
  • Yaseen, Amer Atta, and Mireille Bayart. 2018. “A Model-Free Approach to Networked Control System with Time-Varying Communication Delay.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (24): 558–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.631
  • Yasue, Kanako. 2020. “Extraction of Monophasic Data from Flight Test Data via Cluster Analysis.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (3): 399–407. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035564
  • Yates, E. Carson. 1966. “Modified-Strip-Analysis Method for Predicting Wing Flutter at Subsonic to Hypersonic Speeds.” Journal of Aircraft 3 (1): 25–29. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43702
  • Yates, E. Carson, Eleanor C. Wynne, and Moses G. Farmer. 1983. “Effects of Angle of Attack on Transonic Flutter of a Supercritical Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 20 (10): 841–47. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44952
  • Yates, E. Carson, Eleanor C. Wynne, Moses G. Farmer, and Robert N. Desmarais. 1982. “Prediction of Transonic Flutter for a Supercritical Wing by Modifiedstrip Analysis.” Journal of Aircraft 19 (11): 999–1004. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44803
  • Ye, Hui, Mou Chen, and Qingxian Wu. 2015. “Flight Envelope Protection Control Based on Reference Governor Method in High Angle of Attack Maneuver.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2015: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/254975
  • Ye, Kun, Mengbing Yang, Liuzhen Qin, Rongrong Xue, and Zhengyin Ye. 2024. “Effects of Structural Geometric Nonlinearities on the Transonic Aeroelastic Characteristics of Wing.” Aerospace Science and Technology 149: 109161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109161
  • Yeo, Derrick, Ella M. Atkins, Luis P. Bernal, and Wei Shyy. 2015. “Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft in-Flight Pitch and Yaw Control Moment Sensing.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (2): 403–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c032682
  • Yin, Mingzhou, Q. P. Chu, Y. Zhang, Michael A. Niestroy, and C. C. de Visser. 2019. “Probabilistic Flight Envelope Estimation with Application to Unstable Overactuated Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (12): 2650–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g004193
  • Yin, Tangwen, Dan Huang, and Xiaochun Zhang. 2025. “Edge Computing Aileron Mechatronics Using Antiphase Hysteresis Schmitt Trigger for Fast Flutter Suppression.” Control Theory and Technology 23 (1): 153–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-024-00240-8
  • Yingsong, Gu, Yang Zhichun, and He Shun. 2015. “Body Freedom Flutter of a Blended Wing Body Model Coupled with Flight Control System.” Procedia Engineering 99: 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.506
  • Yonekura, Kazuo, and Katsuyuki Suzuki. 2021. “Data-Driven Design Exploration Method Using Conditional Variational Autoencoder for Airfoil Design.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 64 (2): 613–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02851-0
  • Yoo, Chung-Hee. 2017. “Active Control of Aeroelastic Vibrations for Electromechanical Missile Fin Actuation Systems.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 40 (12): 3299–3306. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g002821
  • Yoo, Jaehyun, Dohyun Jang, H. Jin Kim, and Karl H. Johansson. 2021. “Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Control for a Micro Quadrotor Flight.” IEEE Control Systems Letters 5 (2): 505–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcsys.2020.3001663
  • Yoo, Seungmin, Shinkyu Jeong, Jongho Jung, and Kangkuk You. 2023. “Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Shape Design Optimization of Canard-Controlled Missiles for Reducing Induced Roll.” Optimization and Engineering 25 (2): 841–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-023-09827-7
  • York, C. B., and F. W. Williams. 1995. “Buckling Analysis of Skew Plate Assemblies: Classical Plate Theory Results Incorporating Lagrangian Multipliers.” Computers & Structures 56 (4): 625–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)00568-n
  • You, Hangil, Seongik Kim, and Gun Jin Yun. 2020. “Design Criteria for Variable Camber Compliant Wing Aircraft Morphing Wing Skin.” AIAA Journal 58 (2): 867–78. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058002
  • You, Dazhang, Yiming Lei, Shan Liu, Yepeng Zhang, and Min Zhang. 2022. “Networked Control System Based on PSO-RBF Neural Network Time-Delay Prediction Model.” Applied Sciences 13 (1): 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010536
  • You, C., M. Yasaee, and I. Dayyani. 2019. “Structural Similitude Design for a Scaled Composite Wing Box Based on Optimised Stacking Sequence.” Composite Structures 226: 111255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111255
  • Young, Yin L., Nitin Garg, Paul A. Brandner, et al. 2018. “Load-Dependent Bend-Twist Coupling Effects on the Steady-State Hydroelastic Response of Composite Hydrofoils.” Composite Structures 189: 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.112
  • Yu, Zhefeng, Jicheng Fang, Yan Chen, and Hai Wang. 2017a. “Damage Resistance of a Co-Cured Composite Wing Box to Low-Velocity Impact.” Composite Structures 176: 516–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.042
  • Yu, Yin, Zhoujie Lyu, Zelu Xu, and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2018. “On the Influence of Optimization Algorithm and Initial Design on Wing Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” Aerospace Science and Technology 75: 183–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.016
  • Yu, Yang, Zhengjie Wang, and Shijun Guo. 2017b. “Efficient Method for Aeroelastic Tailoring of Composite Wing to Minimize Gust Response.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2017: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1592527
  • Yu, Jiashang, and Jiaju Yu. 2026. “Neural Learning Control of Fighter Aircraft at High-Angle-of-Attack Maneuvers with Online Recorded Data and Disturbance Observer.” IEEE Access 14: 39702–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3668314
  • Yu, Xiang, Youmin Zhang, and Zhixiang Liu. 2016. “Fault-Tolerant Flight Control Design with Explicit Consideration of Reconfiguration Transients.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 39 (3): 556–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001414
  • Yu, Zelong, Jingjuan Zhang, and Xueyun Wang. 2023. “Thrust Vectoring Control of a Novel Tilt-Rotor UAV Based on Backstepping Sliding Model Method.” Sensors 23 (2): 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020574
  • Yu, Shijie, Xinghua Zhou, and Rui Huang. 2024. “Time-Varying Aeroelastic Modeling and Analysis for a Morphing Wing.” AIAA Journal 62 (10): 3825–40. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j063544
  • Yuan, Ye, Douglas Thomson, and David Anderson. 2022. “Faster-than-Realtime Inverse Simulation Method for Tiltrotor Handling Qualities Investigation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 124: 107516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107516
  • Yuan, LaoHu, LiDong Wang, and JinXiu Zhang. 2024. “Adaptive Dynamic Programming Base on MMC Device of a Flexible High-Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft.” Aerospace Science and Technology 151: 109305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109305
  • Yuan, Yuqi, and Di Zhou. 2024. “Reinforcement Learning for Dual-Control Aircraft Six-Degree-of-Freedom Attitude Control with System Uncertainty.” Aerospace 11 (4): 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11040281
  • Yue, Ting, Xiangyang Zhang, Lixin Wang, and Junqiang Ai. 2017. “Flight Dynamic Modeling and Control for a Telescopic Wing Morphing Aircraft via Asymmetric Wing Morphing.” Aerospace Science and Technology 70: 328–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.08.013
  • Yue, Chengyu, and Yonghui Zhao. 2020. “An Improved Aeroservoelastic Modeling Approach for State-Space Gust Analysis.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 99: 103148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.103148
  • Yuksek, Burak, and Gokhan Inalhan. 2020. “Reinforcement Learning Based Closed-Loop Reference Model Adaptive Flight Control System Design.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 35 (3): 420–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3181
  • Yunker, Austin, Rami Lake, Rajkumar Kettimuthu, and Zachary Kral. 2024. “Evaluating Model Robustness for Defect Identification and Classification in a Composite Aerostructure Material.” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems 8 (1): 011001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065474
  • Yurtsever, Utku, Melin Şahin, and Altan Kayran. 2026. “Aeroservoelastic Modeling and Analysis of Aircraft with Multiple Control Surface Freeplay Nonlinearity.” Aerospace 13 (7): 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13070596
  • Yutuk, Kaan, Alp Tikenogullari, and Ismail H. Tuncer. 2021. “Numerical Investigation of Vortical Flows over a Close-Coupled Delta Canard-Wing Configuration.” Computers & Fluids 216: 104822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104822
  • Zadvornyak, M. I., and T. L. Martynovich. 1983. “Bending of an Anisotropic Plate Containing an Anisotropic Elastic Inclusion.” Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics 24 (6): 920–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00905638
  • Zakharov, Alexey, Elena Zattoni, Miao Yu, and Sirkka-Liisa Jämsä-Jounela. 2015. “A Performance Optimization Algorithm for Controller Reconfiguration in Fault Tolerant Distributed Model Predictive Control.” Journal of Process Control 34: 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.07.006
  • Zanoni, Andrea, Giacomo Gerosa, Luigi Di Lallo, and Pierangelo Masarati. 2022. “Handling Qualities in Rotorcraft Conceptual Design.” Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio 101 (1): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-022-00107-8
  • Zauner, Markus, Pradeep Moise, and Neil D. Sandham. 2023. “On the Co-Existence of Transonic Buffet and Separation-Bubble Modes for the OALT25 Laminar-Flow Wing Section.” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 110 (4): 1023–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-023-00415-4
  • Zaw, Khaing Phyo, and Sergey Vladislavovich Baranovski. 2026. “Structural Parameter Selection for Lightweight Composite Aircraft Wings: A Scoping Review of MDO, Aeroelastic Tailoring, and Stacking Sequence Optimization.” Aerospace 13 (6): 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13060563
  • Zeiler, Thomas A. 1999. “Divergence and Convergence of Iterative Static Aeroelastic Solutions.” Journal of Aircraft 36 (4): 716–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2495
  • ŽEnÍŠEk, VLADIMÍR. 1973. “Linear Sampled-Data Control Systems with Distributed Parameters.” International Journal of Control 17 (2): 337–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207177308932381
  • Zha, Xu, Boran Qiao, Yingpeng Zhuo, Chengze Zhao, Yuchen Yang, and Lixin Guan. 2026. “Dynamic Modeling and Simulation of Morphing Wing Aircraft Considering Rigid-Elastic Coupling Effects.” International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics 6 (1): 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/msd2.70061
  • Zhai, Sheng, Chunzhi Li, Chengcai Wang, and Jianying Yang. 2020. “Vertically Optimal Close Formation Flight Control Based on Wingtip Vortex Structure.” Journal of Aircraft 57 (5): 964–73. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035766
  • Zhang, Ji. 2023. “Dynamic Event-Triggered Delay Compensation Control for Networked Predictive Control Systems with Random Delay.” Scientific Reports 13 (1): 20017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46753-1
  • Zhang, Peng, Fengxi Bai, Yi Liu, et al. 2025b. “Design and Optimization of High Stiffness Tetrahedral Lattice Structure.” Additive Manufacturing 102: 104719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2025.104719
  • Zhang, Dizhou, Zili Chen, Leiping Xi, and Yongjiang Hu. 2018d. “Transitional Flight of Tail-Sitter Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on Multiple-Model Adaptive Control.” Journal of Aircraft 55 (1): 390–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034232
  • Zhang, Bing, Kanglong Chen, and Lei Zu. 2020b. “Aeroelastic Tailoring Method of Tow-Steered Composite Wing Using Matrix Perturbation Theory.” Composite Structures 234: 111696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111696
  • Zhang, Yuming, Yuting Dai, Lihao Feng, Yating Hu, Chenfei Zhao, and Yang Zheng. 2026c. “Gust Load Alleviation Test via Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control and Camber Morphing.” AIAA Journal 64 (7): 4071–85. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j066148
  • Zhang, Y., C. C. de Visser, and Q. P. Chu. 2018b. “Aircraft Damage Identification and Classification for Database-Driven Online Flight-Envelope Prediction.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 41 (2): 449–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g002866
  • Zhang, Y., C. C. de Visser, and Q. P. Chu. 2019a. “Database Building and Interpolation for an Online Safe Flight Envelope Prediction System.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (5): 1166–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003834
  • Zhang, Shenghua, Feng Deng, and Zao Ni. 2026d. “Numerical Analysis of Shock Control Bumps for Delaying Transonic Buffet Boundary on a Swept Wing.” Aerospace 13 (1): 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13010098
  • Zhang, Shenghua, Feng Deng, and Ning Qin. 2022a. “Cooperation of Trailing-Edge Flap and Shock Control Bump for Robust Buffet Control and Drag Reduction.” Aerospace 9 (11): 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9110657
  • Zhang, Yufei, Xiaoming Fang, Haixin Chen, Song Fu, Zhuoyi Duan, and Yanjun Zhang. 2015c. “Supercritical Natural Laminar Flow Airfoil Optimization for Regional Aircraft Wing Design.” Aerospace Science and Technology 43: 152–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.02.024
  • Zhang, Ke-Shi, Zhong-Hua Han, Zhong-Jian Gao, and Yuan Wang. 2018c. “Constraint Aggregation for Large Number of Constraints in Wing Surrogate-Based Optimization.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 59 (2): 421–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2074-4
  • Zhang, Shaojie, Wuhan Han, and Yuemei Zhang. 2020c. “Finite Time Convergence Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion-Based Attitude Control for Flying—Wing Aircraft with Actuator Faults.” Actuators 9 (3): 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/act9030070
  • Zhang, Liu, and Meng He. 2026. “Yaw Stabilization and Maneuvering Control of Tailless Flying Wing by Co-Directional Fluidic Thrust Vectoring.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 39 (1): 103582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2025.103582
  • Zhang, Limin, Xi Li, Ruoyang Liu, Shuai Guo, and Weiqi Ma. 2026b. “Dynamic Performance Analysis of Attitude Control for Statically Unstable Aircraft.” Systems Science & Control Engineering 14 (1): 2634446. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2026.2634446
  • Zhang, Yuanyuan, Jinkun Liu, and Wei He. 2018a. “Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control for a Nonlinear Flexible Aircraft Wing System.” Asian Journal of Control 21 (5): 2340–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1821
  • Zhang, Wenguang, Ruijie Liu, Yifeng Wang, Yuanyuan Wang, and Xu Zhang. 2019b. “Smart Rotor with Trailing Edge Flap Considering Bend–Twist Coupling and Aerodynamic Damping: Modeling and Control.” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 141 (4): 041019. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043240
  • Zhang, Shanshan, Yueheng Qiu, Junshuai Sun, Ban Wang, and Zhenghong Gao. 2024c. “Gust Load Alleviation Control Strategies for Large Civil Aircraft through Wing Camber Technology.” Actuators 13 (6): 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/act13060229
  • Zhang, Xinyue, and Maopeng Ran. 2023. “Meta-Learning-Based Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for Quadrotors with Disturbances.” Applied Sciences 13 (21): 11844. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111844
  • Zhang, Jiaying, Alexander D. Shaw, Chen Wang, et al. 2021a. “Aeroelastic Model and Analysis of an Active Camber Morphing Wing.” Aerospace Science and Technology 111: 106534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106534
  • Zhang, Cheng, Tao Song, Hong Tao, and Tao Jiang. 2025c. “Flight Envelope Constrained UAV Shipboard Landing Control within an Identified Quiescent Period.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 38 (8): 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2025.103463
  • Zhang, Boyang, Xiuxia Sun, Shuguang Liu, and Xiongfeng Deng. 2020a. “Adaptive Model Predictive Control with Extended State Observer for Multi-UAV Formation Flight.” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 34 (10): 1341–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.3145
  • Zhang, Shuo, and Zhengjie Wang. 2019. “Dynamic Distributed Morphing Control of an Aeroelastic Wing for a Small Drone.” Journal of Aircraft 56 (6): 2324–41. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c035182
  • Zhang, Zesheng, Xiaojun Wang, and Xianjia Chen. 2020d. “An Sequential Optimization and Aeroelastic Constraint Transformation Method for Strength-Aeroelastic Comprehensive Design.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 93: 102836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102836
  • Zhang, Z., Z. Wang, and I. Gursul. 2022c. “Post-Stall Flow Control with Upstream Flags.” Experiments in Fluids 63 (11): 179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03528-0
  • Zhang, Chaoyue, Yongchao Wang, Yuxiang Luo, Yufei Jiang, Lintao Wei, and Yaoming Zhou. 2026e. “Priority-Driven Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Aggressive Flight Control of Fixed-Wing Aircraft.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics: 104377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2026.104377
  • Zhang, Xinshuai, Fangfang Xie, Tingwei Ji, Zaoxu Zhu, and Yao Zheng. 2021b. “Multi-Fidelity Deep Neural Network Surrogate Model for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 373: 113485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113485
  • Zhang, Shuyang, Hui Yang, Yingjie Guo, Yan Wang, and Zongquan Deng. 2025a. “Design and Aerodynamic Analysis of Leading Edge for Morphing Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (4): 835–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038158
  • Zhang, Yufei, Pu Yang, Runze Li, and Haixin Chen. 2021d. “Unsteady Simulation of Transonic Buffet of a Supercritical Airfoil with Shock Control Bump.” Aerospace 8 (8): 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8080203
  • Zhang, Jing, Xiaoke Yang, and Lingyu Yang. 2018e. “Virtual-Command-Based Model Reference Adaptive Control for Abrupt Structurally Damaged Aircraft.” Aerospace Science and Technology 78: 452–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.04.043
  • Zhang, G. Q., S. C. M. Yu, A. Chien, and S. X. Yang. 2013. “Aerodynamic Characteristics of Canard-Forward Swept Wing Aircraft Configurations.” Journal of Aircraft 50 (2): 378–87. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c031740
  • Zhang, Shaojie, Han Zhang, and Kun Ji. 2023. “Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Attitude Control for Helicopter with Actuator Delay and Saturation.” Aerospace 10 (6): 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10060521
  • Zhang, Liqi, and Yonghui Zhao. 2023a. “Adaptive Feed-Forward Control for Gust Load Alleviation on a Flying-Wing Model Using Multiple Control Surfaces.” Aerospace 10 (12): 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10120981
  • Zhang, Liqi, and Yonghui Zhao. 2023b. “Time-Varying Aeroelastic Modeling and Analysis of a Rapidly Morphing Wing.” Aerospace 10 (2): 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10020197
  • Zhang, Daoheng, Yuhao Zhao, Tao Cao, Qingchuan Zhan, and Ze Zhang. 2026a. “Dynamic Behavior and Vibration Control of a Coupled Slender-Beam Model Equipped with Internal Local Distributed Coupling Nonlinearities.” Nonlinear Dynamics 114 (12): 832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-026-12701-7
  • Zhang, Xiayang, Meijuan Zhao, Haoquan Liang, and Ming Zhu. 2019c. “Structural and Aeroelastic Analyses of a Wing with Tip Rotor.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 86: 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.01.014
  • Zhang, Ping, Li Zhou, Wenjie Cheng, and Tao Qiu. 2015b. “Conceptual Design and Experimental Demonstration of a Distributedly Actuated Morphing Wing.” Journal of Aircraft 52 (2): 452–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c032739
  • Zhang, Yongjie, Jingpiao Zhou, Lei Shi, and Bo Cui. 2024b. “Design Optimization for the Entire Aircraft Structure of Civil Aircraft with Blended-Wing-Body Layout.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 67 (6): 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-024-03820-z
  • Zhang, Zhibing, Dapeng Zhou, Yeguang Wang, Wanxin Gao, and Yanjun Zhang. 2024a. “Adaptive PI Control Based Stability Margin Configuration of Aircraft Control Systems with Unknown System Parameters and Time Delay.” Journal of Systems Science and Complexity 37 (4): 1507–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-3364-0
  • Zhao, Miao, Bin Ji, David Z. Zhang, Hao Li, and Hailun Zhou. 2022. “Design and Mechanical Performances of a Novel Functionally Graded Sheet-Based Lattice Structure.” Additive Manufacturing 52: 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102676
  • Zhao, Siyuan, and Xiaobing Li. 2019. “Prescribed Performance Fault Tolerant Control for Hypersonic Flight Vehicles with Actuator Failures.” IEEE Access 7: 100187–100204. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2930658
  • Zhao, Dongyu, Shuyuan Liu, Xinghua Chang, Laiping Zhang, and Xiaogang Deng. 2026a. “Design of Intelligent Control Law Embedded with Dynamic Flow Field Perception Method for High-Angle-of-Attack Maneuvers of Numerical Virtual Flight Agent.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2026 (1): 4223020. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijae/4223020
  • Zhao, Rui, Yating Liu, Kaiping Yu, Jingbo Duan, and Yuxiang Yan. 2026b. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis and Flutter Control of Bistable Composite Laminated Cantilever Plates.” Composite Structures 393: 120628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2026.120628
  • Zhao, Jiaxin, Pingli Lu, Changkun Du, and Fangfei Cao. 2024a. “Active Fault-Tolerant Strategy for Flight Vehicles: Transfer Learning-Based Fault Diagnosis and Fixed-Time Fault-Tolerant Control.” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 60 (1): 1047–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2023.3333763
  • Zhao, Jiawei, Haotian Xu, Zhaolei Wang, and Tao Zhang. 2024c. “Online Safe Flight Control Method Based on Constraint Reinforcement Learning.” Drones 8 (9): 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8090429
  • Zhao, Shuai, Yanping Yang, Liyang Zhou, and Zijian Zhang. 2023. “Nolinear Static Aeroelastic Analysis and Optimization for High-Altitude Solar-Powered UAV with Large Aspect Ratio.” IEEE Access 11: 36970–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3235482
  • Zhao, Yonghui, Chengyu Yue, and Haiyan Hu. 2016a. “Gust Load Alleviation on a Large Transport Airplane.” Journal of Aircraft 53 (6): 1932–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033713
  • Zhao, Tong, Yufei Zhang, Haixin Chen, Yingchun Chen, and Miao Zhang. 2016b. “Supercritical Wing Design Based on Airfoil Optimization and 2.75D Transformation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 56: 168–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.07.010
  • Zhao, Li-ming, Wen-ming Zhang, Zhi-wei Wang, Yao-jun Ge, and Nan Jiang. 2024b. “Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamic Forces Prediction and Aeroelastic Analysis of Wind-Induced Bridge Response at Multiple Wind Speeds: A Deep Learning-Based Reduced-Order Model.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 254: 105905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105905
  • Zhao, Haodong, and Changcong Zhou. 2024. “An Imprecise Multiscale Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Fiber Reinforced Composites.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 78: 103686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103686
  • Zheng, Yang, Yuting Dai, Lihao Feng, Guangjing Huang, and Qingyi Liu. 2026. “Flexible Wingtip Active Control Test and Mechanism for Gust Alleviation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 178: 113066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.113066
  • Zhijie, Zhao, Liu Taiyu, Luo Zhenbing, et al. 2025. “Rudderless Flight Control in Flying Wing Aircraft: Core Active Flow Control Technology and Flight Verification.” Experiments in Fluids 66 (10): 183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-025-04112-y
  • Zhong, Danni, Yihua Wang, Zexin Miao, Jifei Wang, and Yanhui Duan. 2026. “Multi-Point Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Transonic Airfoils Based on Transfer Learning.” Aerospace Science and Technology 178: 112392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.112392
  • Zhou, Ling, Dehua Chen, Yang Tao, Guangyuan Liu, Shuheng Song, and Shidong Zhong. 2017. “Passive Shock Wave/boundary Layer Control of Wing at Transonic Speeds.” Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters 7 (6): 325–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2017.11.006
  • Zhou, Kaiwen, Changming Cheng, and Xin Wen. 2024. “Data-Driven Control-Oriented Modeling for Response of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring.” AIAA Journal 62 (10): 3789–3802. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j064022
  • Zhou, Tong, Earl Dowell, and Shun-shan Feng. 2019b. “Computational Investigation of Wind Tunnel Wall Effects on Buffeting Flow and Lock-in for an Airfoil at High Angle of Attack.” Aerospace Science and Technology 95: 105492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105492
  • Zhou, Xinghua, and Rui Huang. 2021a. “Efficient Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of a Morphing Wing via Parameterized Fictitious Mode Method.” Nonlinear Dynamics 105 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06577-y
  • Zhou, Xinghua, and Rui Huang. 2021b. “Subcritical and Supercritical Nonlinear Aeroelastic Behavior of a Morphing Wing with Bilinear Hinge Stiffness.” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 103: 105946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105946
  • Zhou, Lingan, Wenjie Liu, Yifei Li, Yuzhou Wei, Gang Wang, and Jian Sun. 2025c. “Robust Data-Driven Control of LPV Systems with Safety Guarantees.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 36 (3): 1020–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.70185
  • Zhou, Tong, Ghislain Raze, Giancarlo Kosova, and Gaëtan Kerschen. 2025a. “Experimental Nonlinear Modal Analysis of an F-16 Aircraft Using Phase-Locked Loop Control.” Journal of Aircraft 62 (6): 1592–1604. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038195
  • Zhou, Xiao-Yi, Xin Ruan, and P. D. Gosling. 2019c. “Robust Design Optimization of Variable Angle Tow Composite Plates for Maximum Buckling Load in the Presence of Uncertainties.” Composite Structures 223: 110985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110985
  • Zhou, Xiao-Yi, Xin Ruan, and P. D. Gosling. 2019d. “Thermal Buckling Optimization of Variable Angle Tow Fibre Composite Plates with Gap/overlap Free Design.” Composite Structures 223: 110932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110932
  • Zhou, Zan, Zian Wang, Zheng Gong, Xiong Zheng, Yang Yang, and Pengcheng Cai. 2022a. “Design of Thrust Vectoring Vertical/Short Takeoff and Landing Aircraft Stability Augmentation Controller Based on L1 Adaptive Control Law.” Symmetry 14 (9): 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14091837
  • Zhou, Jian, Minglong Xu, and Zhichun Yang. 2019a. “Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Curved Composite Panels with Embedded Macro Fiber Composite Actuators.” Composite Structures 208: 725–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.035
  • Zhou, Li, Jingtao Yang, Tilman Strampe, and Uwe Klingauf. 2022b. “Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Based Path-Following Control for a Hybrid Quad-Plane Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 33 (17): 10304–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6503
  • Zhou, Lan, Nan Ye, and Yong-zai Lu. 1989. “Modelling and Control for Nonlinear Time-Delay System via Pattern Recognition Approach.” IFAC Proceedings Volumes 22 (13): 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-040185-0.50012-9
  • Zhou, Qing, Zhangwei Yu, and Guoping Cai. 2018. “Delayed Sub-Optimal Control for Active Flutter Suppression of a Three-Dimensional Wing.” Journal of Fluids and Structures 80: 275–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.03.009
  • Zhu, Wenwu, Haibo Du, Yingying Cheng, and Zhaobi Chu. 2017b. “Hovering Control for Quadrotor Aircraft Based on Finite-Time Control Algorithm.” Nonlinear Dynamics 88 (4): 2359–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3382-8
  • Zhu, Maolin, Yonghong Li, Ning Qin, et al. 2019. “Shock Control of a Low-Sweep Transonic Laminar Flow Wing.” AIAA Journal 57 (6): 2408–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j058011
  • Zhu, Jin, Yi Wang, Kapil Pant, Peter M. Suh, and Martin J. Brenner. 2017a. “Genetic Algorithm-Based Model Order Reduction of Aeroservoelastic Systems with Consistent States.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (4): 1443–53. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034129
  • Zhu, Xueren, Jiaying Zhang, Wei Chen, and Huaiyuan Gu. 2024. “Tension-Twist Coupling Morphing Wing Using a Novel Mechanical Metamaterial.” Aerospace Science and Technology 155: 109745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109745
  • Zhu, Entong, Zhou Zhou, and Guichen Wang. 2025. “Aerodynamics-Driven Morphing Control and Flight Test for Compound Flexible Multibody Aircraft.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 48 (5): 991–1003. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g008194
  • Zhuang, Wen-Zheng, Chao Yang, and Zhi-Gang Wu. 2021. “Aeroelastic Analysis of Foam-Filled Composite Corrugated Sandwich Plates Using a Higher-Order Layerwise Model.” Composite Structures 257: 112996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112996
  • Ziakos, Nikolaos, Spyridon Kilimtzidis, and Vassilis Kostopoulos. 2025. “Multidisciplinary Aeroelastic Optimization of High Aspect-Ratio Composite Aircraft Wings via Tow-Steering.” CEAS Aeronautical Journal 17 (1): 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00851-0
  • Zohar, Y., and J. Er-El. 1988. “Influence of the Aspect Ratio on the Aerodynamics of the Delta Wing at High Angle of Attack.” Journal of Aircraft 25 (3): 200–205. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45578
  • Zou, Qitong, Rui Huang, and Haiyan Hu. 2022. “Body-Freedom Flutter Suppression for a Flexible Flying-Wing Drone via Time-Delayed Control.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 45 (1): 28–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g006114
  • Zou, Qitong, Rui Huang, Haiyan Hu, and Haojie Liu. 2025b. “Studying Body-Freedom Flutter Mechanism via a Rigid-Elastic Aeroelastic Model of Reduced-Order.” Aerospace Science and Technology 161: 110155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110155
  • Zou, Qitong, Rui Huang, Xusheng Mu, Haiyan Hu, Zimin Fan, and Haojie Liu. 2024. “Body-Freedom Flutter Analysis and Flight Test for a Flying-Wing Aircraft Testbed.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 221: 111717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111717
  • Zou, Qitong, Xusheng Mu, Hongkun Li, Rui Huang, and Haiyan Hu. 2021. “Robust Active Suppression for Body-Freedom Flutter of a Flying-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 358 (5): 2642–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.01.012
  • Zou, Jun, Weixing Yao, and Piao Li. 2017. “Structural Optimization of Aircraft Families with Sensitivity-Based Coordination Method.” Journal of Aircraft 54 (4): 1580–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034029
  • Zuo, Yingtao, Pingjian Chen, Lin Fu, Zhenghong Gao, and Gang Chen. 2015. “Advanced Aerostructural Optimization Techniques for Aircraft Design.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2015: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/753042

Primary Sources, Non-Peer-Reviewed

  • Abc. 2023. “Additive Manufacturing Trends in Aerospace.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 70. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v70i01.2018.347
  • Abdul Huq, Jasim, and Laila Beebi M. 2015. “Review on Fault Detection and Fault Tolerant Control Applied to Flight.” International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research 3 (8): 106–10. https://doi.org/10.70729/ijser15423
  • Abed, Ahmed Tawfeeq Mustafa Ali, Abdnoor Jameel Al-Hamadani, and Mustafa Kamal Mustafa Al-Naser. 2024. “Investigating the Effects of Canard Dihedral Angle on the Wing Span Loading in a Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft at Transonic Speeds at Steady State Conditions Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.” Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems 11 (10): 2859–68. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.111029
  • Abel, I., C. L. Ruhlin, and M. C. Sanford. 1966. Flutter Studies of Simplified Component Models of a Variable-Sweep-Wing Airplane at Mach Numbers up to 3.0. NASA-TN-D-3501. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19660021918
  • Abele, Manlio, Charles Ruger, and Ernest Sanlorenzo. 1973. Study of Moire Measuring Techniques for Wind Tunnel Model Deformation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0766892
  • Abele, Manlio, and Ernest Sanlorenzo. 1975. Study of Moire Measuring Techniques for Wind Tunnel Model Deformation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada013139
  • Abouheaf, Mohammed, Wail Gueaieb, and Frank Lewis. 2020. “Online Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for the Automatic Control of a Flexible Wing Aircraft.” IET Control Theory & Applications 14 (1): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6163
  • Accelerated Development and Flight Evaluation of Active Controls Concepts for Subsonic Transport Aircraft. 1979. NASA-CR-159148. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790025046
  • Ackermann, Ju¨rgen, and R. Isermann. 1973. “Abtastregelung (Sampled Data Control).” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 95 (4): 442–442. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3426752
  • Adegbindin, Moustaine, Nathan Love, Rakesh K. Kapania, and Joseph A. Schetz. 2016. “Control Power Optimization Using Artificial Intelligence for Forward Swept Wing and Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft.” In 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. AIAA 2016-3361. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3361
  • Adney, P. S., and W. J. Horn. 1984. Design of a Composite Wing Extension for a General Aviation Aircraft. NASA-CR-173832. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840024307
  • “Advanced Control Techniques for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Navigation and Flight Control.” 2023. NeuroQuantology. https://doi.org/10.48047/nq.2022.20.10.nq551258
  • “Aero Structural Optimization for Sailplane Wing in Preliminary Design.” 2018. Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.20474/jater-4.1.5
  • “Aerodynamic Performance of Swayasa Aircraft Wing Model against the Effect of Airfoil Flap Angle Configuration.” 2025. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research 14 (1): 48–58. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.14.1.48-58
  • Aggarwal, H. R., and E. T. Cranch. 1967. “A Theory of Torsional and Coupled Bending Torsional Waves in Thin-Walled Open Section Beams.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 34 (2): 337–43. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3607687
  • AHarrah, Ralph C. 2007. Loss-of-Control-Inhibitor Systems for Aircraft. LAR-16566. NASA Headquarters. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20100011189
  • Ahmadi, Ali. 1988. “A Correlation Study of X-29A Aircraft and Associated Analytical Development.” PhD diss., Kansas Univ. Center for Research, Inc.. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880010912
  • Ahmadi, Karim, Davood Asadi, and Seyed Yaser Nabavi Chashmi. 2022. “Fault Tolerant Control of a Quadrotor Based on Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” International Journal of Aeronautics and Astronautics 3 (1): 28–47. https://doi.org/10.55212/ijaa.1033224
  • Ahmed, Abdalsalam Awadalla Ali Haj. 2024. “Estimate Anti-Symmetrical Divergence Modes of an Aircraft Wing Utilizing Aero-Structure Analysis via Aerodynamic Lifting Line Theory.” Engineering and Technology Journal 09 (30). https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v9i10.09
  • Ahmed, Nigar, and Mou Chen. 2021. “Robust Model Reference Adaptive Backstepping Sliding-Mode Control for Quadrotor Attitude with Disturbance Observer.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 93 (7): 1156–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-11-2020-0277
  • Ahmed, Mohamed M., Ahmed E. Elbanna, Shady Zahran, and Gamal M. Elbayoumi. 2025. “Enhanced Control System for Thrust Vectoring: Design, Verification, and Validation.” Unmanned Systems 14 (05): 1095–1126. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2301385026500366
  • Aidala, P. 1985. Canard/Tail Transonic Analysis. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada171075
  • Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards AFB CA. 1974a. Stability and Control. Volume 1. Stability and Control Flight Test Techniques. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada011561
  • Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards AFB CA. 1974b. Stability and Control. Volume 2. Stability and Control Flight Test Theory. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada011562
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1967a. Volume 1. Performance Flight Testing. Appendix C-1. Pitot-Static Position Error Relations. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada320209
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1967b. Volume 1. Performance Flight Testing. Appendix C-2. Pitot-Static Charts. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada320224
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1969. Volume II. Flying Qualities Phase, Chapter 16. Chapter 16: Reprint of NASA TN D-5153, the Use of Pilot Rating in the Evaluation of Aircraft Handling Qualities. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319985
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1981. Flying Qualities Phase, Volume II. Chapter 15: Dynamic Parameter Analysis. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada320347
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1988a. Volume II. Flying Qualities Phase. Chapter 14: Flight Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319984
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1988b. Volume II. Flying Qualities Phase. Chapter 4: Equations of Motion. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319975
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1988c. Volume II. Flying Qualities Phase. Chapter 8: Dynamics. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319979
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1989. Volume II. Flying Qualities Phase. Chapter 9: Roll Coupling. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319980
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1990a. Volume II. Flying Qualities Phase. Chapter 5: Longitudinal Static Stability. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319976
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1990b. Volume II. Flying Qualities Phase. Chapter 6: Maneuvering Flight. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319977
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1990c. Volume II. Flying Qualities Phase. Chapter 7: Lateral-Directional Static Stability. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319978
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1990d. Volume IV. Flight Test Management. Chapter 5. Flight Test Instrumentation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada320062
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1991a. Volume II. Flying Qualities Flight Testing Phase. Chapter 10: High Angle of Attack. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319981
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1991b. Volume II. Flying Qualities, Chapter 1: Introduction to Flying Qualities. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada319972
  • Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca. 1993. Volume IV. Flight Test Management. Chapter 5A. Instrumentation Handbook. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada320063
  • Ajaj, Rafic M., Muhammed S. Parancheerivilakkathil, Mohammadreza Amoozgar, Michael I. Friswell, and Wesley J. Cantwell. 2021. “Recent Developments in the Aeroelasticity of Morphing Aircraft.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 120: 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100682
  • Aker, Sam C., and Peter P. Alukonis. 1976. Development of Design and Manufacturing Technology for Ballistic-Damage- Tolerant Flight Control Components. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada028416
  • Alexander, Michael G. 1991. Subsonic Wind Tunnel Testing Handbook. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada240263
  • Alexander, A., J. T. Tzeng, W. H. Drysdale, and B. P. Burns. 1996. Effective Three-Dimensional (3-D) Finite Element Material Stiffness Formulation for Modeling Laminated Composites. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada306454
  • Ali, Syed Firasat. 1997. A Low Cost Simulation System to Demonstrate Pilot Induced Oscillation Phenomenon. NASA-CR-204540. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970026582
  • Ali, Mariam Ismail, Zheng Chen, Karolos Grigoriadis, and Marzia Cescon. 2026. “A Run-Time Assurance Approach for Safe Control of a Quadrotor.” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 148 (5): 051003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071137
  • Ali, Jaffar Syed Mohamed, and Shahzatul Sakinah Binti Haron. 2021. “Stress Analysis of Composite Aircraft Wing Using Coupled Fluid-Structural Analysis.” CFD Letters 13 (11): 78–86. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.13.11.7886
  • Alizadeh, A., Z. Ebrahimi, A. Mazidi, and S. Ahmad Fazelzadeh. 2020. “Experimental Nonlinear Flutter Analysis of a Cantilever Wing/Store.” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 20 (07): 2050082. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455420500820
  • Allen, D., W. Bradley, S. Groves, J. Ham, and B. Harbert. 1984. Research on Composite Materials for Structural Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada150802
  • Allen, D., W. Bradley, W. Haisler, J. Ham, and B. Harbert. 1983. Research on Composite Materials for Structural Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada134059
  • Allison, Dennis O., and J. Ray Dagenhart. 1987. Two Experimental Supercritical Laminar-Flow-Control Swept-Wing Airfoils. NASA-TM-89073. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890009895
  • Alwan, Nuha A. S., and Zahir M. Hussain. 2026. “Model Reference Adaptive Inverse Control of Nonlinear Systems: A Deep Learning Approach.” Journal of Electrical and Computational Innovations 03 (02): 01–13. https://doi.org/10.33140/jeci.03.02.02
  • Anderson, Ronald O. 1970. A New Approach to the Specification and Evaluation of Flying Qualities. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0710590
  • Anderson, C. A. 1976. “Development of an Active Fly-by-Wire Flight Control System.” In NASA. Dryden Flight Res. Center Advanced Control Technol. and its Potential for Future Transport Aircraft. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760024050
  • Anderson, Paul A., and Myrna L. Toivanen. 1970. Effects of Varying Levels of Autopilot Assistance and Workload on Pilot Performance in the Helicopter Formation Flight Mode. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0706001
  • Anikin, Viktor Andreevich, Oleg Vladimirovich Animitsa, Vladimir Mikhailovich Kuvshinov, and Veniamin Aleksandrovich Leontiev. 2015. “Design of Fly-by-Wire Control System Algorithms for Advanced High-Speed Helicopter.” TsAGI Science Journal 46 (3): 259–87. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2015014083
  • Annadata, Achyuth Ram, Anett Endesfelder, Markus Koenigsdorff, et al. 2024. “A Study on Interactive Fiber Rubber Composite Structures Subjected to Bend-Twist Coupling.” Materials Research Express 11 (10): 105703. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad8397
  • Ansell, G. S., R. G. Loewy, and S. E. Wiberley. 1982. Composite Structural Materials. NASA-CR-169859. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830009326
  • “Application Analysis on Fly-by-Wire Flight Control System on Large Transport Aircraft.” 2022. Foreign Language Science and Technology Journal Database Engineering Technology. https://doi.org/10.47939/et.v3i5(02).13
  • “Application Status and Future Prospect of Aircraft Morphing Wing.” 2023. Journal of Mechanical Engineering 59 (19): 1. https://doi.org/10.3901/jme.2023.19.001
  • Ardema, M. D., and L. J. Williams. 1972. Transonic Transport Study: Structures and Aerodynamics. NASA-TM-X-62157. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720018366
  • Ariaratnam, S. T. 1961. “The Southwell Method for Predicting Critical Loads of Elastic Structures.” Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 14 (2): 137–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmam/14.2.137
  • Arif, A. A., and R. A. Sasongko. 2021. “Flight Test Evaluation for Tilt Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Development.” AVIA 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.47355/avia.v3i1.39
  • Armah, Stephen K. 2018. “Adaptive Control for Quadrotor UAVs Considering Time Delay: Study with Flight Payload.” Robotics & Automation Engineering Journal 2 (5). https://doi.org/10.19080/raej.2018.02.555598
  • Armstrong, Johnny G. 1977. Flight Planning and Conduct of the X-24B Research Aircraft Flight Test Program. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/adb029224
  • Armstrong, William D., William R. Lindberg, John E. McInroy, and Jonathan W. Naughton. 2006. Active Flutter Suppression Using Cooperative, High Frequency, Dynamic-Resonant Aero-Effectors. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada463491
  • Ascani, L. 1974. A Structural Weight Estimation Program (SWEEP) for Aircraft. Volume 1: Executive Summary. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada002850
  • Ashill, P. R. 1970. “On the Minimum Induced Drag of Ground-Effect Wings.” Aeronautical Quarterly 21 (3): 211–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001925900005400
  • Ashkenas, Irving L., and David H. Klyde. 1989. Tailless Aircraft Performance Improvements with Relaxed Static Stability. NASA-CR-181806. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890011628
  • Ashton, J. E. 1970. “Anisotropic Plate Analysis-Boundary Conditions.” Journal of Composite Materials 4 (2): 162–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837000400201
  • Ashworth, J., T. Mouch, and M. Luttges. 1988. “Application of Forced Unsteady Aerodynamics to a Forward Swept Wing X-29 Model.” In 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. AIAA 1988-563. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1988-563
  • Ashworth, J., M. Waltrip, and M. Luttges. 1986. “Three-Dimensional Unsteady Flow Fields Elicited by a Pitching Forward Swept Wing.” In 4th Joint Fluid Mechanics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference. AIAA 1986-1104. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1986-1104
  • Audoin, B., and S. Baste. 1994. “Ultrasonic Evaluation of Stiffness Tensor Changes and Associated Anisotropic Damage in a Ceramic Matrix Composite.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 61 (2): 309–16. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2901446
  • “Autonomous Flight Control of Drone Equipped with Microcomputer for Flight Control and GPS.” 2018. Proceedings of Conference of Chugoku-Shikoku Branch 2018.56 (0): 1215. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmecs.2018.56.1215
  • Awadalla Ali Haj Ahmed, Abdalsalam. 2024. “Aeroelastic Structural Analysis to Calculate Symmetrical Divergence Modes of an Aircraft Wing Using Aerodynamic Lifting Line Theory.” Engineering and Technology Journal 09 (30). https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v9i10.08
  • Babu, Sushanlal, Muhammed Anaz Khan, P. Rohith, V. R. Levi Reuben, and Ajith Raj Rajendran. 2026. “A Comprehensive Numerical Study on Trailing-Edge Camber Morphing of a NACA 4412 Airfoil for Aerodynamic Performance Enhancement and Longitudinal Stability of Fixed-Wing UAVs.” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-026-01260-1
  • Badaliance, R., and H. D. Dill. 1981. Effect of Fighter Attack Spectrum on Composite Fatigue Life. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada105034
  • Bahr, M., M. McKay, R. Niemiec, and F. Gandhi. 2021. “Handling Qualities of Fixed-Pitch, Variable-Speed Multicopters for Urban Air Mobility.” Aeronautical Journal 126 (1300): 952–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.114
  • Bai, Zhiqiang. 2018. “Flight Control System Network Architecture Design and Simulation Based on Time-Triggered Protocol.” Journal of Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.0025
  • Bai, Yuguang, Xiaole Xu, and Sheng Zhang. 2022. “Flutter Modelling and Computation of a Flying Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Engineering Research and Reports: 25–32. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2022/v22i517537
  • Bailey, R. E., and L. H. Knotts. 1990. Interaction of Feel System and Flight Control System Dynamics on Lateral Flying Qualities. NASA-CR-179445. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910005040
  • Bailey, Randall E., Bruce G. Powers, and Mary F. Shafer. 1988. Interaction of Feel System and Flight Control System Dynamics on Lateral Flying Qualities. AIAA PAPER 88-4327. Calspan Advanced Technology Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880063393
  • Bailey, R. E., and R. E. Smith. 1981. “Analysis of Augmented Aircraft Flying Qualities through Application of the Neal-Smith Criterion.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820026927
  • Bakunowicz, J., and R. Meyer. 2016. “In-Flight Wing Deformation Measurements on a Glider.” Aeronautical Journal 120 (1234): 1917–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.98
  • Balakrishnan, Venkataramanan. 2000. Robust Gain-Scheduled Nonlinear Control Design for Stability and Performance. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada377873
  • Balatti, Davide, Hamed Haddad Khodaparast, M. I. Friswell, Marinos Manolesos, and Andrea Castrichini. 2022. “Improving Gust Load Alleviation Performance of Hinge Wingtip Using Validated Aeroelastic Models.” Preprint, . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4258795
  • Balunov, Kirill A., Yuri O. Solyaev, and Konstantin S. Golubkin. 2023. “Application of the Topological Optimization Method for the Structural Synthesis of a Stiffeners in a Kink Zone of a High Aspect Ratio Wing.” Trudy MAI, no. 129. https://doi.org/10.34759/trd-2023-129-04
  • Bandyopadhyay, G. 1989. “Low Speed Aerodynamics of Canard Configurations.” Aeronautical Journal 93 (921): 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000016651
  • Banks, H. T. 1988a. Computational Methods for Control and Estimation of Distributed System. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada204640
  • Banks, Daniel W. 1988b. “Wind-Tunnel Investigation of the Forebody Aerodynamics of a Vortex-Lift Fighter Configuration at High Angles of Attack.” In Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890063987
  • Bar-Shalom, Y. 1985. Stochastic Adaptive Control and Estimation Enhancement. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada159053
  • Bar-Shalom, Y. 1989. Stochastic Adaptive Control and Estimation Enhancement. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada215486
  • Bar-Shalom, Y. 1990. Stochastic Adaptive Control and Estimation Enhancement. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada219629
  • Baranovski, Sergei Vladislavovich, and Konstantin Valerievich Mikhailovskiy. 2020. “Structurally Optimized Polymer Composite Wing Design. Part 2: Tow-Steered Composite.” TsAGI Science Journal 51 (3): 305–15. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2020036204
  • Bartels, Robert E., Bret K. Stanford, and Josiah M. Waite. 2019. “Performance Enhancement of the Flexible Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft Using Variable-Camber Continuous Trailing-Edge Flaps.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200002388
  • Bataineh, Ahmad, and Majd Shawabkeh. 2023. “Control of Deflection Angle of Morphing Wing Using Fuzzy Logic System.” International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE) 16 (6): 247. https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v16i6.24344
  • Batterson, James G., and Thomas M. Omara. 1989. Estimation of Longitudinal Stability and Control Derivatives for an Icing Research Aircraft from Flight Data. NASA-TM-4099. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890006554
  • Bauchau, Olivier A. 1981. “Experimental Measurement of Elastic Shear Modulus of Graphite/Epoxy Tubes.” Journal of Composite Materials 15 (2): 151–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838101500205
  • Bauer, Jeffrey E., Robert Clarke, and John J. Burken. 1995. Flight Test of the X-29A at High Angle of Attack: Flight Dynamics and Controls. NASA-TP-3537. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950016389
  • Baumgärtner, Daniel, Andrea Viti, Antoine Dumont, Gérald Carrier, and Kai-Uwe Bletzinger. 2016. “Comparison and Combination of Experience-Based Parametrization with Vertex Morphing in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft.” In 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. AIAA 2016-3368. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3368
  • Bay, Ahmet Ertuğrul, and Tolgay Kara. 2026. “Aerodynamic Performance and Vortex Structure Investigations for a NACA2412 Based Non-Slender Delta Wing.” Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 15 (2): 928–37. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1847172
  • Bazhenov, Sergey Georgievich, and Natalia Borisovna Lysenkova. 2015. “Selection Method of Monitoring Algorithm Thresholds for Airliner’s Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System.” TsAGI Science Journal 46 (1): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2015013712
  • Beatty, T. D., W. B. Brooks, and L. D. Robinson. 1977. Investigation of a Variable Camber Wing Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada045951
  • Beharie, M. M., J. O. Pedro, and L. Dala. 2015. “Design of a Quadrotor Flight Test Stand for System Identification.” Aeronautical Journal 119 (1214): 501–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000010587
  • Beitalmal, Abdusslam Osman. 2025. “A Hybrid Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) and Finite Element Method (FEM) Framework for Multiscale Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems.” RA Journal Of Applied Research 11 (04). https://doi.org/10.47191/rajar/v11i4.11
  • Belmont, Howard H. 1983. A Study of Digitally Controlled Flight Control Actuation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada133274
  • Ben-Gida, Hadar, and Roi Gurka. 2022. “The Leading-Edge Vortex over a Swift-like High-Aspect-Ratio Wing with Nonlinear Swept-Back Geometry.” Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 17 (6): 066016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ac9bb5
  • Benaouali, Abdelkader, and Abdelwahid Boutemedjet. 2024. “Multidisciplinary Analysis and Structural Optimization for the Aeroelastic Sizing of a UAV Wing Using Open-Source Code Integration.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 96 (4): 585–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-11-2023-0310
  • Bennett, Robert M., John T. Batina, and Herbert J. Cunningham. 1988. Wing Flutter Calculations with the CAP-TSD Unsteady Transonic Small Disturbance Program. NASA-TM-100580. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880010035
  • Bennett, R. M., M. G. Farmer, R. L. Mohr, and W. E. Hall Jr. 1977. A Wind Tunnel Technique for Determining Stability Derivatives from Cable Mounted Aeroelastic Models. AIAA PAPER 77-1128. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770060309
  • Benyamen, Hady, Mozammal Chowdhury, and Shawn Keshmiri. 2024. “Data-Driven Aircraft Modeling for Robust Reinforcement Learning Control Synthesis with Flight Test Validation.” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 146 (6): 061105. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065804
  • Beppu, G., and H. C. Curtiss Jr. 1966. An Analytical Study of Factors Influencing the Longitudinal Stability of Tilt-Wing VTOL Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0640945
  • Berger, Tom, Chris L. Blanken, Jeff A. Lusardi, Mark B. Tischler, and Joseph F. Horn. 2022a. “Coaxial-Compound Helicopter Flight Control Design and High-Speed Handling Qualities Assessment.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 67 (3): 98–113. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.67.032008
  • Berger, Tom, Chris L. Blanken, Jeff A. Lusardi, Mark B. Tischler, and Joseph F. Horn. 2022b. “Tiltrotor Flight Control Design and High-Speed Handling Qualities Assessment.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 67 (3): 114–28. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.67.032009
  • Bergman, Stefan. 1948. Two-Dimensional Transonic Flow Patterns. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada301214
  • Bernstein, Dennis S. 2000. Intelligenct Flight Control of Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada382981
  • Berry, D. T. 1981. Flying Qualities Criteria and Flight Control Design. AIAA PAPER 81-1823. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810059723
  • Besch, Peter K., and Yuan-Ning Liu. 1973. Bending Flutter and Torsional Flutter of Flexible Hydrofoil Struts. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0757645
  • Besch, Peter K., Rood Jr., and Edwin P. 1976. A Parametric Survey of Hydrofoil Strut Flutter. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada027188
  • Bester, Duwan. 2023. “Applying Design for Additive Manufacturing to Existing Aerospace Parts.” MATEC Web of Conferences 388: 05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202338805002
  • Bidinotto, J. H., H. C. Moura, and J. P. C. A. Macedo. 2021. “A Survey of Human Pilot Models for Study of Pilot-Induced Oscillation (PIO) in Longitudinal Aircraft Motion.” Aeronautical Journal 126 (1297): 533–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.82
  • Biezad, Daniel J., and Hwei-Lan Chou. 1993. Low Bandwidth Robust Controllers for Flight. NASA-CR-193085. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930017967
  • Bihrle, William, and Billy. 1980. Influence of Pitching Moment Characteristics on Departure and Uncoordinated Roll Reversal Boundaries for Fighter Configurations. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada082335
  • Billingsley, James P. 1976. Sting Dynamics of Wind Tunnel Models. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada024445
  • Binion, T. W., Jr. 1971. An Investigation of Several Slotted Wind Tunnel Wall Configurations with a High Disc Loading V/STOL Model. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0723294
  • Binion, T. W., Jr. 1975. An Experimental Study of Several Wind Tunnel Wall Configurations Using Two V/STOL Model Configurations. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada012000
  • Binz, F., T. Islam, and D. Moormann. 2019. “Attitude Control of Tiltwing Aircraft Using a Wing-Fixed Coordinate System and Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles 11: 1756829319861370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756829319861370
  • Binz, F., and D. Moormann. 2020. “Actuator Modelling for Attitude Control Using Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles 12: 1756829320961925. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756829320961925
  • Birdsall, D. L. 1970. “A Non-Linear Solution to a Tab-Aileron Flutter Problem.” Aeronautical Journal 74 (714): 509–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000114812
  • Biskner, Adam, and John Higgins. 2005. Design and Evaluation of a Reinforced Advanced-Grid Stiffened Composite Structure. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada443361
  • Bjarke, Lisa J., John H. Delfrate, and David F. Fisher. 1992. “A Summary of the Forebody High-Angle-of-Attack Aerodynamics Research on the F-18 and the X-29A Aircraft.” In SAE Aerotech 1992 Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930003165
  • Black, G. Thomas, and David J. Moorhouse. 1979. Flying Qualities Design Requirements for Sidestick Controllers. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada085085
  • Blair, M., and T. Weisshaar. 1981. “Wind Tunnel Experiments on the Divergence of Swept Wings with Composite Structures.” In Aircraft Systems and Technology Conference. AIAA 1981-1670. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1981-1670
  • Bliss, D. B. 1980. Wind Tunnel Wall Interference. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada093301
  • Boby, Rounakul Islam, Khaizuran Abdullah, A. Z. Jusoh, Nagma Parveen, and Md Mahmud. 2019. “Adaptive Control of Nonlinear System Based on QFT Application to 3-DOF Flight Control System.” TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control) 17 (5): 2595. https://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v17i5.12810
  • Boden, Fritz, Henk Jentink, and Christian Petit. 2013b. “IPCT Wing Deformation Measurements on a Large Transport Aircraft.” In Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34738-2_7
  • Boden, Fritz, Claudio Lanari, Anwar Torres, and Thorsten Weikert. 2013a. “In-Flight IPCT Wing Deformation Measurements on a Small Aircraft.” In Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34738-2_5
  • Bodson, Marc. 2000. Constrained Control Allocation Methods for Reconfigurable Flight Control Laws. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada381657
  • Bohlmann, Jonathan D. 1989. “Static Aeroelasticity of a Composite Oblique Wing in Transonic Flows.” In NASA, Langley Research Center, Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity 1987, Part 2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890009883
  • Bohlmann, Jonathan D., and Robert C. Scott. 1991. “A Taguchi Study of the Aeroelastic Tailoring Design Process.” In AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910047245
  • Bolding, R. M., and R. O. Stearman. 1976. “The Design, Analysis, and Testing of a Low-Budget Wind-Tunnel Flutter Model with Active Aerodynamic Controls.” In NASA. Langley Res. Center Flutter Testing Tech.,. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770014087
  • Bondarenko, Oleksander, and Vyacheslav Shkolnyi. 2024. “Aeroelastic Vibrations Control System of an Unmanned Aircraft.” Mechanics of Gyroscopic Systems, no. 48: 137–47. https://doi.org/10.20535/0203-3771482024318185
  • Bons, Nicolas P., Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, Felipe I. K. Odaguil, and Ana Paula C. Cuco. 2022. “Aerostructural Wing Optimization of a Regional Jet Considering Mission Fuel Burn.” ASME Open Journal of Engineering 1: 011046. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055630
  • Boothe, Edward M., Robert T. N. Chen, and Charles R. Chalk. 1974. A Two-Phase Investigation of Longitudinal Flying Qualities for Fighters. Phase I: The Effect of Evaluation Technique and Flight Phase on Flying Qualities Assessment. Phase II: An Example of Criteria Development, Control System Design and Flight Test Evaluation of Four Control Systems Using Eta-z, Alpha, and q Feedback. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0782218
  • Bosch, J. A., and W. J. Kuehl. 1976. Reconfigurable Redundancy Management for Aircraft Flight Control. AIAA PAPER 76-1932. General Electric Co. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760058477
  • Bosworth, John T. 1992. Linearized Aerodynamic and Control Law Models of the X-29A Airplane and Comparison with Flight Data. NASA-TM-4356. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920009932
  • Bosworth, John T., and Timothy H. Cox. 1989. “A Design Procedure for the Handling Qualities Optimization of the X-29A Aircraft.” In AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890065158
  • Bottasso, Carlo Luigi, and Pierluigi Montinari. 2015. “Rotorcraft Flight Envelope Protection by Model Predictive Control.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 60 (2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.60.022005
  • Bouras, Meryem. 2020. “A Review of the Most Adopted Fault Tolerance Approaches for SRAM Based FPGA Real Time Critical Embedded System.” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 12 (SP3): 237–41. https://doi.org/10.5373/jardcs/v12sp3/20201258
  • Bowers, A. H. 1984. X-29A Longitudinal and Directional Force and Moment Supplemental Transonic Wind Tunnel Test Results. NASA-TM-85909. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870001428
  • Bowes, W. C., and R. V. Miller. 1976. Inertially Derived Flying Qualities and Performance Parameters. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada026963
  • Bowman, Keith B., Ramana V. Grandhi, and F. E. Eastep. 1989. “Optimum Structural Design with Static Aeroelastic Constraints.” In NASA. Langley Research Center, Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Part 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890015800
  • Boyd, William Newsome. 1977. Effect of Chordwise Forces and Deformations and Deformations Due to Steady Lift on Wing Flutter. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada053640
  • Boyden, R. P. 1974. Dynamic Stability Characteristics in Pitch, Yaw, and Roll of a Supercritical-Wing Research Airplane Model. NASA-TM-X-2900. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830002753
  • Boyden, R. P. 1978. Subsonic Dynamic Stability Characteristics of Two Close-Coupled Canard-Wing Configurations. NASA-TP-1291. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780025107
  • Bradley, Walter L. 1986. Delamination Fracture in Graphite/Epoxy Materials. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada173255
  • Briggs, M. M., R. E. Reed, and J. N. Nielsen. 1982. Wing-Alone Aerodynamic Characteristics to High Angles of Attack at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada125764
  • Brigham, C. R., R. E. Barrie, L. M. Atkinson, et al. 1973. Advanced Metallic Structures: Cargo Wing Design for Improved Cost, Weight, and Integrity. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0782258
  • Bright, L. G., and V. L. Peterson. 1960. Effects of Deflected Wing Tips on the Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Canard Configuration at Mach Numbers from 0.7 to 3.5. NASA-TM-X-392. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19650018341
  • Brock, L. D., and H. A. Goodman. 1981. Reliability Analysis of the F-8 Digital Fly-by-Wire System. NASA-CR-163110. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820004206
  • Brooks, J. D., and J. K. Beamish. 1977. Measurement of Model Aeroelastic Deformations in the Wind Tunnel at Transonic Speeds Using Stereophotogrammetry. NASA-TP-1010. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780002105
  • Broussard, J. R., and N. Halyo. 1983. Active Flutter Control Using Discrete Optimal Constrained Dynamic Compensators. Information and Control Systems, Inc. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840042741
  • Brown, S. R., and K. J. Szalai. 1977. Flight Experience with a Fail-Operational Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System. AIAA PAPER 77-1507. NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780028344
  • Bruno, Joseph, and Mark Libeskind. 1990. “Design, Evaluation and Experimental Effort toward Development of a High Strain Composite Wing for Navy Aircraft.” In NASA. Langley Research Center, Eighth DOD(NASA)FAA Conference on Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, Part 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920023270
  • Büchter, Kai-Daniel, Carlos Sebastia Saez, and Dominik Steinweg. 2021. “Modeling of an Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring Sensor Network for Operational Impact Assessment.” Structural Health Monitoring 21 (1): 208–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217211048149
  • Budd, G. D. 1984. Locally Linearized Longitudinal and Lateral-Directional Aerodynamic Stability and Control Derivaties for the X-29A Aircraft. NASA-TM-84919. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860014095
  • Budd, Gerald D. 1987. Predicted Pitching Moment Characteristics of X-29A Aircraft. NASA-TM-88284. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890009047
  • Buffington, James M. 1997. Tailless Aircraft Control Allocation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada327799
  • Buffington, James. 1999a. Modular Control Design for the Innovative Control Effectors (ICE) Tailless Fighter Aircraft Configuration 101-3. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada375713
  • Buffington, James F. 1999b. Modular Control Law Design for the Innovative Control Effectors (ICE) Tailless Fighter Aircraft Configuration 101-3. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada374954
  • Bugała, Pamela. 2025. “Low-Fidelity Static Aeroelastic Analysis for Jig Shape Optimization of a Solar-Powered Hale Aircraft Wing.” Transactions on Aerospace Research 2025 (2): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.2478/tar-2025-0008
  • Bugała, Pamela, and Andriy Payenskyy. 2025. “Efficient Static Aeroelastic Wing Optimization Based on PSO for Preliminary Design.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 97 (10): 1290–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-05-2025-0183
  • Bullock, T. E., and S. L. Fields. 1998. Application of Robust Control and Gain Scheduling to Missile Autopilot Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada357847
  • Burken, John J. 2007. Reconfigurable Control with Neural Network Augmentation for a Modified F-15 Aircraft. DFRC-599. NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20090007779
  • Burkett, C. W. 1989. “Reductions in Induced Drag by the Use of Aft Swept Wing Tips.” Aeronautical Journal 93 (930): 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000022235
  • Burner, A., and S. Martinson. 1996. “Automated Wing Twist and Bending Measurements under Aerodynamic Load.” In Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Conference. AIAA 1996-2253. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1996-2253
  • Burnett, E. L., J. A. Beranek, B. T. Holm-Hansen, C. J. Atkinson, and P. M. Flick. 2016. “Design and Flight Test of Active Flutter Suppression on the X-56A Multi-Utility Technology Test-Bed Aircraft.” Aeronautical Journal 120 (1228): 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.41
  • Burns, B. R. A. 1975. “Fly-by-Wire and Control Configured Vehicles—Rewards and Risks.” Aeronautical Journal 79 (770): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000034862
  • Busan, Ron. 1998. Flutter Model Technology. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada340820
  • Butler, R. W. 1976. A Wind Tunnel Captive Aircraft Testing Technique. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada023690
  • Butler, G. F. 1983. “An Analytical Study of the Induced Drag of Canard-Wing-Tail Aircraft Configurations with Various Levels of Static Stability.” Aeronautical Journal 87 (868): 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000051046
  • Byreddy, Chakradhar, Ramana V. Grandhi, and Philip Beran. 2003. Dynamic Aeroelastic Instabilities of an Aircraft Wing with Underwing Store in Transonic Regime. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada417124
  • Calico, R., Jr., and S. Fuller. 1981. “Stability Characteristics of a Forward Swept Wing Aircraft at High Angles of Attack.” In 7th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. AIAA 1981-1884. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1981-1884
  • Campbell, Richard L., and Leigh A. Smith. 1989. “Applications of a Transonic Wing Design Method.” In NASA, Ames Research Center, NASA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Volume 2: Sessions 7-12. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910001577
  • Campbell, Stephen L., and William J. Terrell. 1987. Derivative Arrays, Geometric Control Theory, and Realizations of Linear Descriptor Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada190882
  • Cao, Lin, Shuo Tang, and Dong Zhang. 2017. “Flight Control for Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicles Using Linear Quadratic Regulator Design Based on Stochastic Robustness Analysis.” Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 18 (7): 882–97. https://doi.org/10.1631/fitee.1601363
  • Capone, F. J. 1981. Aeropropulsive Characteristics of Twin Nonaxisymmetric Vectoring Nozzles Installed with Forward-Swept and Aft-Swept Wings. NASA-TP-1778. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810010493
  • Carico, Dean. 1998. Flight Test Automation Options. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada350677
  • Carlson, Henry A., Rolf Verberg, and Charles A. Harris. 2017. “Aeroservoelastic Modeling with Proper Orthogonal Decomposition.” Physics of Fluids 29 (2): 020711. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975673
  • Carneiro, Pedro Miguel Cardoso, and Pedro Gamboa. 2019. “Structural Analysis of Wing Ribs Obtained by Additive Manufacturing.” Rapid Prototyping Journal 25 (4): 708–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-02-2018-0044
  • Casey, J. K. 1988. Empirical Flutter Prediction Method. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada195699
  • Cen, Fei, Qing Li, Zhitao Liu, Lei Zhang, and Yong Jiang. 2020. “Post-Stall Flight Dynamics of Commercial Transport Aircraft Configuration: A Nonlinear Bifurcation Analysis and Validation.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 235 (3): 368–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410020944085
  • Cesnik, Carlos. 2002. Active Aeroelastic Tailoring of High-Aspect-Ratio Composite Wings. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada401331
  • Cesnik, Carlos E. 2005. Active Aeroelastic Tailoring of High-Aspect-Ratio Composite Wings. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada439640
  • Chabir, Alaa, Yassine Bouteraa, and Rahma Boucetta. 2017. “Trirotor Mechatronic Design and Reduction of Dynamic Model Inputs by Aerodynamic Forces Identification.” International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control 27 (1): 14. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmic.2017.082487
  • Chabod, Amaury, and Nicolas Baron. 2020. “Digital Twin for Fatigue Analysis.” Fatigue of Aircraft Structures 2020 (12): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2020-0005
  • Chacon, Vince, and David McBride. 1988. Operational Viewpoint of the X-29A Digital Flight Control System. NASA-TM-100434. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880011768
  • Chacon, Vince, and David McBride. 1990. Operation of the X-29A Digital Flight-Control System. ARC-12209. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900000158
  • Chalk, Charles R., T. P. Neal, T. M. Harris, Francis E. Pritchard, and Robert J. Woodcock. 1969. Background Information and User Guide for Mil-F-8785B (ASG), ‘Military Specification-Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes’. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0860856
  • Chance Vought Corp Dallas Tx. 1979. V/STOL Aircraft Design Sensitivity to Flying Qualities Criteria Study. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada358711
  • Chaparro, Daniel, Gustavo E. C. Fujiwara, Eric Ting, and Nhan Nguyen. 2016. “Aerodynamic Modeling of Transonic Aircraft Using Vortex Lattice Coupled with Transonic Small Disturbance for Conceptual Design.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160008102
  • Chattopadhyay, Aditi, and Ratneshwar Jha. 1996. Development of a Composite Tailoring Technique for Airplane Wing. NASA-CR-205326. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970028021
  • Chattopadhyay, Aditi, and Sen Zhang. 1995. Development of a Composite Tailoring Procedure for Airplane Wing. NASA-CR-199081. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950026507
  • Chauhan, D., C. Praveen, and R. Duvigneau. 2023. “Wing Shape Optimization Using FFD and Twist Parameterization.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 225–30. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v62i4.2010.508
  • Chen, Haifei, Jinfeng Gao, and Renquan Lu. 2017b. “A Time-Delay-Dependent Quantization Feedback Control Approach for Networked Control System.” Control and Intelligent Systems 45 (4). https://doi.org/10.2316/journal.201.2017.4.201-2838
  • Chen, Yining, Xin Gao, and Tianyi Wu. 2023d. “A Novel Aerodynamic Layout Design of Composite Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on Canard Configuration.” Applied and Computational Engineering 9 (1): 188–93. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/9/20230085
  • Chen, Xiaomao, and Jinglong Han. 2017. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of High-Aspect-Ratio Composite Joined-Wing UAV.” Mathematical Models in Engineering 3 (1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.21595/mme.2017.18505
  • Chen, Jie, Zhengdong Jing, Chentao Wu, Senyao Chen, and Liye Cheng. 2020b. “Improved Fault Diagnosis for Aircraft Flap Control System Based on Bond Graph.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 92 (8): 1159–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2020-0005
  • Chen, Xi, He Ren, Cees Bil, and Yongquan Sun. 2015b. “Integration of Structural Health Monitoring with Scheduled Maintenance of Aircraft Composite Structures.” International Journal of Agile Systems and Management 8 (3/4): 264. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijasm.2015.073525
  • Chen, Zhen, Zhiwei Shi, Sinuo Chen, Xueqi Liao, and Yang Mei. 2023b. “Active Flutter Suppression on a Flexible Wing via Leading-Edge Blowing and Circulation Control.” Physics of Fluids 35 (9): 094106. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0162013
  • Chen, Zhen, Zhiwei Shi, Sinuo Chen, Shengxiang Tong, and Yizhang Dong. 2023a. “Active Flutter Suppression for a Flexible Wing Model with Trailing-Edge Circulation Control via Reinforcement Learning.” AIP Advances 13 (1): 015317. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0130370
  • Chen, Yongbin, and Zhili Tang. 2017. “Natural Laminar Flow Airfoil Shape Design at Transonic Regimes with Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 233 (3): 991–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017746199
  • Chen, Jiao, Jiangyun Wang, and Weihong Wang. 2019a. “Robust Adaptive Control with Control Structure Modification for Aircraft.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 32 (3): 04019019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001004
  • Chen, ZengQiang, ZhiHong Yang, MinNan Piao, Jian Huang, and MingWei Sun. 2018a. “Attitude Control Synthesis of Unstable Hypersonic Vehicle with Aeroservoelastic Effect.” SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica 49 (7): 825–39. https://doi.org/10.1360/n092017-00428
  • Chen, YingChun, YuFei Zhang, Miao Zhang, HaiXin Chen, and Tong Zhao. 2015a. “Aerodynamic Optimization Method of Supercritical Airfoil Geared to the Performance of Swept and Tapered Wing.” SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica 45 (10): 104708–104708. https://doi.org/10.1360/sspma2015-00338
  • Chen, Chao, Jiyang Zhang, Daibing Zhang, and Lincheng Shen. 2017a. “Control and Flight Test of a Tilt-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 14 (1): 1729881416678141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881416678141
  • Chen, Zhiqiang, and Yonghui Zhao. 2020. “Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Hypersonic Flutter Suppression Based on Parametric ROM.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 33 (6): 04020083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001201
  • Cheng, H. K., S. Y. Meng, R. Chow, and R. C. Smith. 1980. “Transonic Swept-Wing Analysis Using Asymptotic and Other Numerical Methods.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800038581
  • Cheng, Shuo, Jianhua Zhou, and Mian Li. 2015. “A New Hybrid Algorithm for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization with Interval Uncertainty.” Journal of Mechanical Design 137 (2): 021401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029026
  • Chin, J., H. Berman, and J. Ellinwood. 1982. “X-29A Flight Control System Design Experiences.” In Guidance and Control Conference. AIAA 1982-1538. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1982-1538
  • Chin, J., V. Chacon, and J. Gera. 1987. X-29A Flight Control System Performance during Flight Test. AIAA PAPER 87-2878. Grumman Aerospace Corp. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880027032
  • Chipman, R., F. Rauch, M. Rimer, and B. Muniz. 1984. Body-Freedom Flutter of a 1/2-Scale Forward-Swept-Wing Model, an Experimental and Analytical Study. NASA-CR-172324. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840013485
  • Chipman, R., F. Rauch, M. Rimer, B. Muniz, and R. H. Ricketts. 1985. “Transonic Test of a Forward Swept Wing Configuration Exhibiting Body Freedom Flutter.” In Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850048205
  • Chipman, R., A. Zislin, and C. Waters. 1982. “Active Control of Aeroelastic Divergence.” In 23rd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. AIAA 1982-684. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1982-684
  • Choi, In-Ho. 2016. “Flight Envelope Load Factor Limit Logic Design for Helicopter Fly-By-Wire Controller.” Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 17 (1): 159–64. https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2016.17.1.159
  • Choi, JaeWon, ByeongUk Lim, SiHun Lee, and SangJoon Shin. 2020. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Forward-Swept Wing Using One-Dimensional Beam Analysis.” Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 48 (8): 555–63. https://doi.org/10.5139/jksas.2020.48.8.555
  • Choi, Mijin, Manish Man Shrestha, Jung-Ryul Lee, and Chan-Yik Park. 2017. “Development of a Laser-Powered Wireless Ultrasonic Device for Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring.” Structural Health Monitoring 17 (2): 145–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716686963
  • Choosak Ngaongam and Rapee Ujjin. 2024. “Aerodynamic Characteristics of Forward Swept Wing in Subsonic Speed.” CFD Letters 16 (5): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.16.5.18
  • Chu, Julio, and Pierce L. Lawing. 1990. High-Reynolds-Number Test of a 5-Percent-Thick Low-Aspect-Ratio Semispan Wing in the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel: Wing Pressure Distributions. NASA-TM-4227. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930020260
  • CHulin, Kulikova N. V. N. A. 2023. “Refinement of Aircraft Dynamics Model and Control System According to the Flight-Tests Results.” Automation Modern Techologies: 86–94. https://doi.org/10.36652/0869-4931-2023-77-2-86-94
  • Clark, Robert L. 2001. Aeroelastic Leveraging and Control through Adaptive Structures. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada399161
  • Clark, E. L., and C. J. Spurlin. 1962. The Aerodynamic Characteristics of a 75-DEG Swept Delta Wing at High Angles of Attack and Mach Numbers of 2 to 8 (u). Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0329345
  • Clarke, Robert, John J. Burken, John T. Bosworth, and Jeffery E. Bauer. 1994. “X-29 Flight Control System: Lessons Learned.” In AGARD Flight Mechanics Panel Symposium. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940029878
  • Clarke, R., D. Shane, J. Roskam, and D. I. Rummer. 1982. Development of a Simple, Self-Contained Flight Test Data Acquisition System. NASA-CR-168912. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820015371
  • Clay, Larry E., and Ronald I. Rockafellow. 1973. T-38 Structural Flight Loads Data for June 1970 through December 1971. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0758891
  • Clements, Keith. 2016. “Time-Domain Stability Margin Assessment.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160013364
  • Clements, Dominic, and Kamal Djidjeli. 2023. “Aerodynamic Performance of Morphing and Periodic Trailing-Edge Morphing Airfoils in Ground Effect.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 36 (3): 04023012. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-4707
  • Clews, D. G. 1973. “Hardware Integration and Improved Operation of the Flight Control System.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 45 (4): 20–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb035015
  • Clyde, J. A., E. Bonner, T. P. Goebel, and L. Spacht. 1984. Joined Wing Transonic Design and Test Validation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada148355
  • Çoban, Sezer. 2020. “Improving Autonomous Performance of a Passive Morphing Fixed Wing UAV.” Information Technology And Control 49 (1): 28–35. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.49.1.23275
  • Cobo-González, Álvaro, Rodney Rodríguez-Robles, and Cristina Cuerno-Rejado. 2026. “Recent Advances in Active Flutter Suppression: A Comprehensive Review.” Aeronautical Journal: 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2026.10212
  • Coe, Paul L., Jr., John N. Perkins, and D. Bruce Owens. 1990. “Exploratory Wind Tunnel Investigation of the Stability and Control Characteristics of a Three-Surface, Forward-Swept Wing Advanced Turboprop Model.” In AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900058865
  • Cohen, G. A. 1978. Transverse Shear Stiffness of Laminated Anisotropic Shells. Structures Research Associates. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780046985
  • Cohen, Gerald A. 1982. “Effect of Transverse Shear Deformation on Anisotropic Plate Buckling.” Journal of Composite Materials 16 (4): 301–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838201600404
  • Cohen, Dorothea, and Jeanette H. Le. 1991. “The Role of the Remotely Augmented Vehicle (RAV) Laboratory in Flight Research.” In AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910063181
  • Coldsnow, Matthew, Prospero Uybarreta, Dennis Rippy, Alan Driver, and Christopher Kirkland. 2009. Limited Investigation of Active Feel Control Stick System (Active Stick). Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada516721
  • Cole, S. R. 1986. Divergence Study of a High-Aspect Ratio, Forward-Swept Wing. AIAA PAPER 86-0009. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860034894
  • Cole, Julian D. 1988b. Theoretical Aerodynamics, Transonic Flow. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada196247
  • Cole, Julian, L. P. Cook, and F. Ziegler. 1980. Transonic Aerodynamics. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada207109
  • Collins, Edward. 1988. “X-29A Subsystems Integration: An Example for Future Aircraft.” SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series 1. https://doi.org/10.4271/881504
  • “Combined Flight Control/utility System.” 1974. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 46 (3): 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb035139
  • Comer, Anthony M., and Imon Chakraborty. 2024. “Full Envelope Flight Control System Design and Optimization for a Tilt-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 69 (3): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.69.032003
  • “Composite Materials in Aircraft Structures: The Harrier AV-8B/GR5 Close Air Support Aircraft with Vertical and Short Take-off and Landing Capability.” 1989. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 61 (7): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb036810
  • “Concorde Automatic Flight Control System: A Brief Description of the Concorde AFCS and of Its Performance during the Flight Trials.” 1971. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 43 (3): 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb034745
  • Connelly, Edward M. 1982. Performance Measures for Aircraft Carrier Landings as a Function of Aircraft Dynamics. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada120473
  • Cook, L. Pamela. 1979. “Lifting-Line Theory for a Swept Wing at Transonic Speeds.” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 37 (2): 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/542990
  • Corliss, L. D., and P. D. Talbot. 1977. A Failure Effects Simulation of a Low Authority Flight Control Augmentation System on a UH-1H Helicopter. NASA-TM-73258. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770024230
  • Cornell Aeronautical Lab INC Buffalo NY. 1947. Dynamic Longitudinal Stability and Control Flight Tests of a B-25J Airplane. Forced Oscillation and Step Function Response Methods Utilizing an a-12 Automatic Pilot. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada800190
  • Cotton, L. S. 1974. Three-Axis Fluidic/Electronic Automatic Flight Control System Flight Test Report. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada000894
  • Cotton, Stacey J., and Lisa J. Bjarke. 1994. Flow-Visualization Study of the X-29A Aircraft at High Angles of Attack Using a 1/48-Scale Model. NASA-TM-104268. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950004446
  • Crabtree, D. J. 1979. Room Temperature Curing Resin Systems for Graphite/Epoxy Composite Repair. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada081738
  • Craig, Andrew. 1965. Investigation of the Concept of Direct Flight Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0628087
  • Crandall, Kenneth J., David J. Maund, William E. Gerken, and James H. Vincent. 1973. STOL Tactical Aircraft Investigation. Volume V. Part I. Flight Control Technology: System Analysis and Trade Studies for a Medium STOL Transport with Vectored Thrust/Mechanical Flaps. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0766642
  • Crane, D. F. 1983. “Compensation for Time Delay in Flight Simulator Visual-Display Systems.” In Flight Simulation Technologies Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830055004
  • Crane, D. F. 1984. “The Effects of Time Delay in Man-Machine Control Systems: Implications for Design of Flight Simulator Visual-Display-Delay Compensation.” In AF Human Resources Lab. The IMAGE 3 Conf. Proc.. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850009674
  • Crane, Harold L., and Robert W. Sommer. 1961. Effects of Control-Feel Configuration on Airplane Longitudinal Control Response. NASA-TN-D-912. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980227996
  • Crawley, Edward F., and Sung Won Lee. 1978. The Natural Mode Shapes and Frequencies of Graphite Epoxy Cantilevered Plates and Shells. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada062582
  • Crimi, Peter, and John M. Grace. 1965. Flutter Analysis of a Hydrofoil near a Free Surface. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0619661
  • Croom, Mark A., Raymond D. Whipple, Daniel G. Murri, Sue B. Grafton, and David J. Fratello. 1988. “High-Alpha Flight Dynamics Research on the X-29 Configuration Using Dynamic Model Test Techniques.” In Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890063988
  • Croop, Harold C. 1985. Fabrication of Curved Graphite/Epoxy Compression Test Panels and Generation of Material Properties. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada368444
  • Crother, Carl A., Brian Gabelman, and Del Langton. 1973. Structural Mode Effects on Flying Qualities in Turbulence. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada004416
  • Crowe, J. H. 1937. “Longitudinal Stability: Some Notes on the Static and Dynamic Stability of Tapered Wing Monoplanes.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 9 (3): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb030157
  • Cui, Ranting, Guillermo Azuara, Francesco Lanza di Scalea, and Eduardo Barrera. 2021. “Damage Imaging in Skin-Stringer Composite Aircraft Panel by Ultrasonic-Guided Waves Using Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Network.” Structural Health Monitoring 21 (3): 1123–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217211023934
  • Cui, L., Y. Yang, and Y. H. Liu. 2016. “Robust Fault-Tolerant Control Allocation for an Input-Redundant Aircraft.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 29 (2): 04015042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000528
  • Cully, Donald C., and Theodore J. Boller. 1973. Design Guide Handbook for the Design of Ballistic-Damage-Tolerant Short- Fiber-Molded Aircraft Flight Control System Components. Volume I. Design Criteria, Concepts, Tooling, Fabrication, Testing, and Evaluation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0916279
  • Cunningham, Herbert J., John T. Batina, and Robert M. Bennett. 1987. Modern Wing Flutter Analysis by Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods. ASME PAPER 87-WA/AERO-9. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880064102
  • Currao, Gaetano M. D., and Bing-Sheng Jiang. 2026. “Transonic Deep Stall of a Free-to-Pitch Rigid Wing.” Flow 6: E19. https://doi.org/10.1017/flo.2026.10056
  • Curry, Paul R., Matthews Jr., and James T. 1965. Suggested Requirements for V/STOL Flying Qualities. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0617748
  • Curry, Robert E., Bryan J. Moulton, and John Kresse. 1989. “An in-Flight Investigation of Ground Effect on a Forward-Swept Wing Airplane.” In AGARD Symposium on Aerodynamics of Combat Aircraft, Controls, and of Ground Effect. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900004886
  • Curry, Robert E., Bryan J. Moulton, and John Kresse. 1990. “An in-Flight Investigation of Ground Effect on a Forward-Swept Wing Airplane.” In AGARD, Aerodynamics of Combat Aircraft Controls and of Ground Effects. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900019217
  • Curtiss Jr. and Howard C. 1961. Some Basic Considerations Regarding the Longitudinal Dynamics of Aircraft and Helicopters. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0263838
  • Cuschieri, J. M. 1990. Mobility Power Flow Analysis of a Thick Plate Structure. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada279431
  • Cutchins, M. A., and J. W. Purvis. 1982. “A Simulation Language Approach to Structural Interaction Problems.” In NASA. Langley Research Center Res. in Struct. and Solid Mech., 1982. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820025882
  • Czyba, Roman, and Lukasz Stajer. 2019. “Dynamic Contraction Method approach to digital longitudinal aircraft flight controller design.” Archives of Control Sciences: 97–109. https://doi.org/10.24425/acs.2019.127525
  • Czysz, Paul A. 1963. Correlation of Wind Tunnel Blockage Data. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0407689
  • D’Andrea, Raffaello. 2003. Robust and Optimal Control of Spatially Interconnected Systems, with Application to Coordinated Vehicle Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada422201
  • D’Andrea, Raffaello. 2008. Control of Air Vehicle Swarms. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada530333
  • Dai, Yuting, and Chao Yang. 2015. “Aeroservoelastic Model Modification and Uncertainty Quantification with Bayesian Posteriori Estimation.” Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences 58 (4): 237–46. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.58.237
  • Dandois, Julien. 2016. “Experimental Study of Transonic Buffet Phenomenon on a 3D Swept Wing.” Physics of Fluids 28 (1): 016101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937426
  • Daniel, I. M. 1976. Biaxial Testing of Graphite/Epoxy Composites Containing Stress Concentrations. Part I.. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada041490
  • Daniel de Almeida Pereira and Flávio Donizeti Marques. 2015. “Supercritical and Subcritical Bifurcation in Typical Aeroelastic Section with Structural Nonlinearities.” In 23rd ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering. ABCM Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.20906/cps/cob-2015-0339
  • “Data-Driven Model-Free Adaptive Control Tuned by Virtual Reference.” 2016. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.13.1.2016.1.7
  • Dávila, Carlos G., and Chiara Bisagni. 2017. “Fatigue Life and Damage Tolerance of Postbuckled Composite Stiffened Structures with Indentation Damage.” Journal of Composite Materials 52 (7): 931–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998317715785
  • Davis, D. F. 1973. Advanced Metallic Structures: Air Superiority Fighter Wing Design for Improved Cost, Weight and Integrity. Volume 2. Design Data. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0781807
  • Davis, J., T. Garnett, and J. Gaul. 1977. Heavy Lift Helicopter Flight Control System. Volume III. Automatic Flight Control System Development and Feasibility Demonstration. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada050059
  • Davis, D. D., Jr., Gary L. Farley, Damodar R. Ambur, et al. 1993. “An Analytically Designed Subcomponent Test to Reproduce the Failure of a Composite Wing Box Beam.” In In: AIAA(ASME)ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 34th and AIAA/ASME Adaptive Structures Forum, La Jolla, CA, Apr. 19-22, 1993, Technical Papers. Pt. 1 (A93-33876 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930049917
  • Dawson, Kenneth S., and Paul E. Fortin. 1987. An Integrated Study of Structures, Aerodynamics and Controls on the Forward Swept Wing X-29A and the Oblique Wing Research Aircraft. NASA-CR-181548. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880003104
  • de Medeiros, Ricardo, Dirk Vandepitte, and Volnei Tita. 2017. “Structural Health Monitoring for Impact Damaged Composite: A New Methodology Based on a Combination of Techniques.” Structural Health Monitoring 17 (2): 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716688442
  • De Wagter, Christophe, and Joost Meulenbeld. 2019. “Modeling the Unstable DelftaCopter Vertical Take-off and Landing Tailsitter Unmanned Air Vehicle in Hover and Forward Flight from Flight Test Data.” International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles 11: 1756829319880302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756829319880302
  • Deandrea, Jay, James Roache, and Michael Robinson. 1991. “Three-Dimensional Unsteady Flow Fields Elicited by Pitching a Canardand Forward Swept Wing Configuration.” In 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. AIAA 1991-5. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1991-5
  • Deangelis, V. M. 1981. “In-Flight Deflection Measurement of the HiMAT Aeroelastically Tailored Wing.” In Flight Testing Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820030846
  • Deepa, M. S., and S. C. Gupta. 2023. “Flight Envelope Expansion during Prototype Development.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 220–32. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v65i2.2013.727
  • Deets, D. A. 1975. “Design and Development Experience with a Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System in an F-8C Airplane.” In Description and Flight Test Results of the NASA F-8 Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750010175
  • Del Frate, John H. 1992. “In-Flight Flow Visualization Results from High Angle of Attack Tests on a Forward Swept Wing Aircraft with Comparisons to Water Tunnel Results.” In Flow Visualization VI. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84824-7_44
  • Delfrate, John H., and John A. Saltzman. 1992. “In-Flight Flow Visualization Results from the X-29A Aircraft at High Angles of Attack.” In Biennial Flight Test Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930004134
  • Demarchi, Joseph N., and Robert K. Haning. 1978. Flight Verification of the Advanced Flight Control Actuation System (AFCAS) in the T-2C Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada060326
  • Demir, Oğuzhan, and İbrahim Seyfullah Babaarslan. 2021. “A Software Verification Approach That Complies with DO-178B Certification Rules on UAV’s Flight Control Computer.” American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology 6 (2): 32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajset.20210602.13
  • Deng, Bohai, Jinfa Xu, Xiangchen Mao, and Xin’ao Wang. 2026a. “Fuzzy Extended-State Adaptive Sliding Mode Flight Control of Compound Thrust Unmanned Helicopter.” Unmanned Systems: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2301385027500622
  • Deng, Deshuang, Xu Zeng, Zhengyan Yang, et al. 2024a. “Multi-Frequency Probabilistic Imaging Fusion for Impact Localization on Aircraft Composite Structures.” Structural Health Monitoring 24 (1): 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217241233181
  • Description and Flight Test Results of the NASA F-8 Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System. 1975. NASA-TN-D-7843. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750010173
  • “Design and CFD Analysis of Supercritical Airfoil 0714 under Ground-Level Atmospheric Conditions.” 2024. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v9i4.74
  • “Design of an Aircraft Wing Structure for Static& Fatigue Life Prediction.” 2019. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering 8 (2S11): 2614–18. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.b1316.0982s1119
  • “Design Optimization for SG6043 Airfoil for Using Finite Elements Analysis.” 2025. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering 12 (9). https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/ijme-v12i9p109
  • Desilva, B. M. E., and R. T. Medan. 1978. Vortex Effects for Canard-Wing Configurations at High Angles of Attack in Subsonic Flow. NASA-TM-78543. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790005851
  • Devi, Ramona. 2019. “From Theory to Flight: Design and Application of Pitch Rate Control Augmentation Systems.” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 8 (11): 1996–98. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr231208204149
  • Dexter, P. C. 1993. “High Angle of Attack Missile Aerodynamics.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 207 (1): 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1993_207_241_02
  • Dhadekar, Dinesh D., Ajay Misra, and S. E. Talole. 2021. “Robust Fault-Tolerant Flight Path Angle Control.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 93 (7): 1171–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-07-2020-0149
  • Dhonau, O. E., E. G. Blosser, J. E. Littlefield, J. E. Madorin, and J. F. Bradshaw. 1974. S-3A Graphite/Epoxy Spoiler Development Program. Volume 1. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada032816
  • Diederich, Franklin W., and Bernard Budiansky. 1948. Divergence of Swept Wings. NACA-TN-1680. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930082318
  • Dilmi, Smain. 2022. “Enhancing Flight Envelope for a Nonlinear Aeroelastic Wing-Section Using Adaptive Fuzzy Sliding Mode Control Law.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 35 (3): 04022009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001401
  • Dlamini, Z., and T. Jones. 2016. “Fly-by-Wire Robustness to Flight Dynamics Change under Horizontal Stabiliser Damage.” Aeronautical Journal 120 (1228): 1005–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.42
  • Dobos-Bubno, S., and Larry B. Hartsook. 1977. Validation of MIL-F-9490D: General Specification for Flight Control System for Piloted Military Aircraft. Volume II. YF-17 Lightweight Fighter Validation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada062008
  • Dodayav, Md Al-Amin, Amlan Biswas, and Mohammad Ilias Inam. 2024. “Flow Separation Control of an Airfoil by Using External Fluid Flow at a High Angle of Attack.” Preprint, . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4875854
  • Doggett, R. V., Jr., and R. H. Ricketts. 1980. Dynamic Response of a Forward-Swept-Wing Model at Angles of Attack up to 15 Deg at a Mach Number of 0.8. NASA-TM-81863. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810003937
  • Doggett, Robert V., Jr., Jose A. Rivera Jr., and Eric C. Stewart. 1995. Flutter Clearance Flight Tests of an OV-10A Airplane Modified for Wake Vortex Flight Experiments. NASA-TM-109168. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950019961
  • Doi, Osamu, and Kouichi Kataoka. 1982. “Residual Stress Measurement of Laminated Anisotropic Plate by Strain Gauge Method.” Bulletin of JSME 25 (207): 1373–77. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.25.1373
  • Dong, Yizhang, Zhiwei Shi, Kun Chen, and Jie Chen. 2019. “Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Sideslip on Canard-Configuration Aircraft at High Angle of Attack.” AIP Advances 9 (5): 055114. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5093559
  • Dowell, E. H., and D. B. Bliss. 1978. Wind Tunnel Wall Interference. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada055735
  • Dowell, Earl H., and Kenneth C. Hall. 2003. Theoretical Prediction of Limit Cycle Oscillations in Support of Flight Flutter Testing. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada426408
  • Droney, Christopher K., Anthony J. Sclafani, Neal A. Harrison, Adam D. Grasch, and Michael D. Beyar. 2020. Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research: Phase III – Mach 0.75 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Design. NASA/CR-20205005698. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205005698
  • Drtil, H., and H. Schulz. 1978. “Flight Control System FRG 70 D Realization and Testing….” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 50 (4): 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb035443
  • Dugundji, John. 1965. Theoretical Considerations of Panel Flutter at High Supersonic Mach Numbers. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0624995
  • Dugundji, John, Earl Dowell, and Brian Perkin. 1962. Subsonic Flutter of Panels on Continuous Elastic Foundations: Experiment and Theory. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0278235
  • Dukes, Theodor A. 1970. Feedback Control of VTOL Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0871424
  • Dul, Franciszek. 2018. “Active Suppression of Freeplay Aeroelastic Vibrations of Ailerons by Robust Control Methods with Incomplete Measurements.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 90 (4): 688–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-11-2016-0215
  • Dunmire, C. J. 1982. Development of a Compression Testing Method for Graphite/Epoxy Coupons. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada148595
  • Dunn, W. R., D. Cottrell, J. Flanders, A. Javornik, and M. Rusovick. 1986. Investigation of an Advanced Fault Tolerant Integrated Avionics System. NASA-CR-176980. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860019473
  • Dunning, Peter D., Bret K. Stanford, H. Alicia Kim, and Christine V. Jutte. 2014. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Plate Wing with Functionally Graded Materials.” In American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140007305
  • Durand, Tulvio S., and Gary L. Teper. 1964. An Analysis of Terminal Flight Path Control in Carrier Landing. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0606040
  • Durlofsky, Harold, and Jean Mayers. 1970. Effects of Interlaminar Shear on the Bending and Buckling of Laminated Beams. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0871426
  • Durston, D. A., and J. A. Schreiner. 1983. High Angle-of-Attack Aerodynamics of a Strake-Canard-Wing V/STOL Fighter Configuration. AIAA PAPER 83-2510. NASA Ames Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840027787
  • Dzhurynskyi, Oleksandr. 2026. “Additive Technologies in the Polymer Components Manufacturing for Aerospace Structures: Design and Optimization Methods.” Aerospace Technic and Technology, no. 1: 27–39. https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2026.1.03
  • Earls, Michael R., and Joel R. Sitz. 1989. “Initial Flight Qualification and Operational Maintenance of X-29A Flight Software.” In AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890065304
  • Ebner, R. E., and J. G. Mark. 1977. Redundant Integrated Flight Control/navigation Inertial Sensor Complex. AIAA PAPER 77-1109. Litton Systems, Inc. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770059956
  • Ecer, Akin. 1985. A Zonal Approach to the Design of Finite Element Grids for 3-D Transonic Flows with Complex Geometries. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada162168
  • Eckstrom, C. V., and C. V. Spain. 1982. Design Considerations and Experiences in the Use of Composite Material for an Aeroelastic Research Wing. AIAA PAPER 82-0678. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820046611
  • Edwards, R. J. 1963. ELASTO-PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES UNDER LOAD AND TWO-DIMENSIONAL TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION – Volume 3. EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE GENERAL TIME-DEPENDENT ANALYSIS. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0401458
  • Edwards, R. 1992. “An Approach for Increasing Aeroelastic Divergence Dynamic Pressure of Wind-Tunnel Models.” In 17th Aerospace Ground Testing Conference. AIAA 1992-4002. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-4002
  • Edwards, John, and Carol Wieseman. 2003. “Flutter and Divergence Analysis Using the Generalized Aeroelastic Analysis Method.” In 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA 2003-1489. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-1489
  • “Effective Torsional Stiffness of Equivalent Beams.” 1976. ACI Journal Proceedings 73 (10). https://doi.org/10.14359/11098
  • Efremov, Alexander V., Alexander I. Shcherbakov, Fedor A. Korzun, and Vladislav A. Prodanik. 2022. “Prospective Means for the Aircraft Pilot Induced Oscillation Suppression.” Vestnik Moskovskogo aviatsionnogo instituta 29 (1): 201–10. https://doi.org/10.34759/vst-2022-1-201-210
  • Ekaterinaris, J. A., and Lewis B. Schiff. 1990. “Numerical Simulation of the Effects of Variation of Angle of Attack and Sweep Angle on Vortex Breakdown over Delta Wings.” In AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900058795
  • El-Salamony, Mostafa E., and Mohamed A. Aziz. 2020. “Impact of N-Shaped Wing Morphing on Solar-Powered Aircraft.” Unmanned Systems 09 (04): 309–20. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2301385021500138
  • Elenchezhiyan, M., and A. Kumar. 2025. “Robustness Analysis of Nonlinear Filters for Aircraft State Estimation.” Aeronautical Journal 130 (1343): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2025.10069
  • Elliott, Jarrell R. 1976. NASA’s Advanced Control Law Program for the F-8 Digital Fly-By-Wire Aircraft. Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770045950
  • Elliott, J. 1977. NASA’s Advanced Control Law Program for the F-8 Digital Fly-By-Wire Aircraft. Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780028448
  • Elshazly, E., Mohammed Kassem, and M. A. Elshafei. 2025. “Aeroelastic Coupled Mode Behavior of Swept Composite Wing.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 3070 (1): 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3070/1/012001
  • Enciu, Daniela. 2019. “Flight Envelope Expansion via Piezoelectric Actuation Receptance Method and Time-Delayed Feedback Control.” International Journal of Modeling and Optimization: 317–21. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijmo.2019.v9.729
  • Engelland, S. A., J. A. Franklin, M. W. Stortz, and G. H. Hardy. 1992. “Piloted Simulation Evaluation of Pitch Control Designs for Highly Augmented STOVL Aircraft.” In AIAA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930029331
  • Enns, Dale. 2003. Robust Flight Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada411755
  • Eraslan, Yüksel, and Tuğrul Oktay. 2023. “Multidisciplinary Performance Enhancement on a Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle via Simultaneous Morphing Wing and Control System Design.” Information Technology And Control 52 (4): 833–48. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.52.4.33527
  • Erickson, Gary E. 2003. Control of Interacting Vortex Flows at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds Using Passive Porosity. AD-A419098. Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040016158
  • Eriksson, Ingvar. 1990. “On the Bearing Strength of Bolted Graphite/Epoxy Laminates.” Journal of Composite Materials 24 (12): 1246–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839002401201
  • Eugene, L. Tu. 1996. Numerical Study of Steady and Unsteady Canard-Wing-Body Aerodynamics. NASA-TM-110394. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19960047050
  • “Experimental Investigation of Synthetic Jet Control of Wing Rock for a Flying Wing Aircraft.” 2023. Physics of Fluids 35 (5): 054111. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0147213
  • Fadel, Mohamed, Mahmoud Rabie, and Ahmed Youssef. 2019. “Modeling, Simulation and Control of a Fly-by-Wire Flight Control System Using Classical PID and Modified PI-D Controllers.” Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés 52 (3): 267–76. https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.520307
  • Fan, Xiaoshuai, Zhenyu Jiang, Shifeng Zhang, and Xibin Bai. 2026. “Integrated Design Method of Aircraft RBF Neural Network-Based Fault Diagnosis and Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 98 (6–7): 909–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2026-0033
  • Fang, Genshen, Jinxin Cao, Yongxin Yang, Lin Zhao, Shuyang Cao, and Yaojun Ge. 2020. “Experimental Uncertainty Quantification of Flutter Derivatives for a PK Section Girder and Its Application on Probabilistic Flutter Analysis.” Journal of Bridge Engineering 25 (7): 04020034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001567
  • Fanucci, Jerome Paul. 1987. “Thermal Response of Radiantly Heated Kevlar and Graphite/Epoxy Composites.” Journal of Composite Materials 21 (2): 129–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838702100204
  • Farbridge, J. E. F., F. A. Woodward, and G. E. A. Thomann. 1956. “Aeroelastic Problems of Low Aspect Ratio Wings: Part V. Application of the Structural and Aeroelastic Matrices to the Solution of Steady State Aeroelastic Problems.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 28 (6): 196–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb032701
  • Fardad, Makan, and Bassam Bamieh. 2006. Perturbation Methods in Stability and Norm Analysis of Spatially Periodic Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada458858
  • Farhat, Charles. 1998. Real Time Predictive Flutter Analysis and Continuous Parameter Identification of Accelerating Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada361695
  • Farhat, Charbel. 2000. Real-Time Predictive Flutter Analysis and Continuous Parameter Identification of Acclerating Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada389378
  • Farhat, Charbel. 2001. Real-Time Predictive Flutter Analysis and Continuous Parameter Identification of Accelerating Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada387498
  • Farhat, Charbel, and David Amsallem. 2011. Control-Oriented Aeroelastic Reduced-Order Modeling of Fighters. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada566361
  • Farkh, Rihem, Moufida Ksouri, and Faouzi Bouani. 2021. “Optimal Robust Control for Unstable Delay System.” Computer Systems Science and Engineering 36 (2): 307–21. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2021.014334
  • Farmer, M. G., and P. W. Hanson. 1976. Comparison of Supercritical and Conventional Wing Flutter Characteristics. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760047098
  • Fazilati, J., and V. Khalafi. 2019a. “Aeroelastic Panel Flutter Optimization of Tow-Steered Variable Stiffness Composite Laminated Plates Using Isogeometric Analysis.” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 38 (19–20): 885–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684419854800
  • Fearnside, K. 1962. “Part Three—Flight Control System: Description of the Smiths Duplex System Designed to Carry out ‘Autoflare’ as Well as a Range of Flight Director and Autopilot Control Modes.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 34 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb033507
  • “A Feasibility Review of SMC-MIMO Based Control Architecture for High Angle of Attack Flight.” 2019. International Journal of Multiphysics 13 (4). https://doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.13.4.339
  • Fedorenko, Myhailo, and Oleksander Bondarenko. 2024. “Possibilities of the Finite Element Method for the Analysis of the Aeroelasticity of the Wing of a Light Aircraft.” Mechanics of Gyroscopic Systems, no. 47: 110–22. https://doi.org/10.20535/0203-3771472024307685
  • Feng, Yiding. 2023. “A Numerical Study on the Optimization of an Airfoil Design.” Theoretical and Natural Science 11 (1): 199–206. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/11/20230408
  • Feuer, A., B. R. Barmish, and A. S. Morse. 1977. An Unstable Dynamical System Associated with Model Reference Adaptive Control,. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada044725
  • Figge, Fred A. 1973. Advanced Metallic Structure: Air Superiority Fighter Wing Design for Improved Cost, Weight and Integrity. Volume 1. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0781810
  • Filimonov, N. B., A. B. Filimonov, and N. S. Nimirich. 2026. “Comparative Analysis of Parametric Robustness of Nonlinear Algorithms for Tracking Control of a Flight Quadcopter under Conditions of Variable Load and External Disturbances.” Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie 27 (2): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.27.83-96
  • Finck, R. D. 1978. USAF (United States Air Force) Stability and Control DATCOM (Data Compendium). Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/adb072483
  • Fisher, David F., David M. Richwine, and Stephen Landers. 1992. “Correlation of Forebody Pressures and Aircraft Yawing Moments on the X-29A Aircraft at High Angles of Attack.” In AIAA Flight Test Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930002344
  • Fleming, Wendell H., and Harold J. Kushner. 1994. Stochastic Control and Nonlinear Estimation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada281219
  • Flight Sciences Lab INC Buffalo NY. 1964. A General Investigation of Hypersonic Stability and Control under Trimmed Flight Conditions. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0442900
  • “Flight Test Data Analysis of Hybrid Vertical Take-off and Landing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” 2016. Journal of Instrumentation, Automation, and Systems. https://doi.org/10.21535/dnk59q51
  • Florance, James R., Jennifer Heeg, Charles V. Spain, Thomas G. Ivanco, Carol D. Wieseman, and Peter S. Lively. 2004. Variable Stiffness Spar Wind-Tunnel Model Development and Testing. AIAA Paper 2004-1588. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040066092
  • Ford, Terry. 1989. “Helicopter Handling Qualities.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 61 (1): 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb036732
  • Fortiş, Teodor Florin, Alexandra Emilia Fortiş, and Ştefan Balint. 2015. “FlightQM: A Multi-Agent System for the Analysis of Flight Qualities.” International Journal of Adaptive and Innovative Systems 2 (2): 118. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijais.2015.072146
  • Fraihat, B. I., and R. M. Ajaj. 2024. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of Stiffened Cantilever Plate Using Composites and Structural Layouts: A Parametric Study.” Aeronautical Journal 128 (1327): 2073–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2024.16
  • Francois, Guillaume, Jonathan E. Cooper, and Paul M. Weaver. 2017. “Aeroelastic Tailoring Using Crenellated Skins-Modelling and Experiment.” Advances in aircraft and spacecraft science 4 (2): 93–124. https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2017.4.2.093
  • Franklin, James A. 1993a. Criteria for Design of Integrated Flight/propulsion Control Systems for STOVL Fighter Aircraft. NASA-TP-3356. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940006662
  • Franklin, James A. 1993b. “Design Criteria for Integrated Flight/Propulsion Control Systems for STOVL Fighter Aircraft.” In Piloting Vertical Flight Aircraft: A Conference on Flying Qualities and Human Factors. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940008824
  • Franklin, J. A., and R. C. Innis. 1972. Longitudinal Handling Qualities during Approach and Landing of a Powered Lift STOL Aircraft. NASA-TM-X-62144. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770026207
  • Franklin, James A., Michael W. Stortz, and James R. Mihaloew. 1990. “Integrated Flight/propulsion Control for Supersonic STOVL Aircraft.” In International Powered Lift Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920062696
  • Fratello, David J., Mark A. Croom, Luat T. Nguyen, and Christopher S. Domack. 1987. Use of the Updated NASA Langley Radio-Controlled Drop-Model Technique for High-Alpha Studies of the X-29A Configuration. AIAA PAPER 87-2559. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870062335
  • Frei, D. R. 1982. “X-29A Forward-Swept-Wing Demonstrator Airplane.” In NASA. Langley Research Center Wind-Tunnel(Flight Correlation, 1981. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820017333
  • Fresconi, Frank, Ilmars Celmins, and Sidra I. Silton. 2014. Theory, Guidance, and Flight Control for High Maneuverability Projectiles. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada593328
  • Freudinger, Lawrence C. 1989. Flutter Clearance of the F-18 High-Angle-of-Attack Research Vehicle with Experimental Wingtip Instrumentation Pods. NASA-TM-4148. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900002416
  • Freudinger, Lawrence C., and Michael W. Kehoe. 1990. Flutter Clearance of the F-14A Variable-Sweep Transition Flight Experiment Airplane, Phase 2. NASA-TM-101717. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900015819
  • Friedmann, Peretz P. 1998. Innovative Scaling Laws for Study of Nonlinear Aeroelastic and Aeroservoelastic Problems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada351094
  • Friend, E. L., and G. M. Sakamoto. 1978. Flight Comparison of the Transonic Agility of the F-111A Airplane and the F-111 Supercritical Wing Airplane. NASA-TP-1368. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790004885
  • Fujii, Kozo. 1985. “Recent computational fluid dynamics works about high angle of attack aerodynamics with separations vortex.” Journal of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences 33 (377): 339–50. https://doi.org/10.2322/jjsass1969.33.339
  • Fukunaga, Hisao. 1990. “On Isotropic Laminate Configurations.” Journal of Composite Materials 24 (5): 519–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839002400504
  • Fukunaga, Hisao, and Hideki Sekine. 1994. “A Laminate Design for Elastic Properties of Symmetric Laminates with Extension-Shear or Bending-Twisting Coupling.” Journal of Composite Materials 28 (8): 708–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839402800802
  • Fukunaga, Hisao, Hideki Sekine, Masaki Sato, and Akira Iino. 1993. “Effect of Bending-Twisting Coupling on Compressive Buckling Characteristics for Symmetrically Laminated Plates.” TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series A 59 (566): 2343–49. https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaia.59.2343
  • Fung, K. Y. 1982. Transonic Flow Research. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada215096
  • Gainer, C. A. 1963. Air Force Flight Control and Flight Display Integration Program. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0404850
  • Galiana, Shankar, Morteza Moradi, Peter Wierach, and Dimitrios Zarouchas. 2024. “Innovative Welding Integration of Acousto-Ultrasonic Composite Transducers onto Thermoplastic Composite Structures.” Structural Health Monitoring 24 (4): 2367–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217241247766
  • Gao, W., W. Jiang, Q. Li, and B. Lu. 2025. “Linear Parameter-Varying Model Order Reduction and Control Design of FLEXOP Demonstrator Aircraft.” Aeronautical Journal 129 (1339): 2648–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2025.41
  • Gao, Dongyue, Yunlong Ma, Zhanjun Wu, Yuebin Zheng, and Hongbo Lu. 2021. “Guided Wave Based Damage Detection Method for Aircraft Composite Structures under Varying Temperatures.” Structural Durability & Health Monitoring 15 (1): 23–37. https://doi.org/10.32604/sdhm.2021.013737
  • Gao, Dongyue, Zhanjun Wu, Lei Yang, and Yuebin Zheng. 2017. “Integrated Impedance and Lamb Wave–based Structural Health Monitoring Strategy for Long-Term Cycle-Loaded Composite Structure.” Structural Health Monitoring 17 (4): 763–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717717312
  • Garabedian, P. R. 1979. “Transonic Airfoil Codes.” In NASA. Langley Res. Center Advanced Technol. Airfoil Res., Vol. 1, Pt. 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790011863
  • Garg, Sanjay, and David K. Schmidt. 1988. “Cooperative Synthesis of Control and Display Augmentation for a STOL Aircraft in the Approach and Landing Task.” In AIAA Guidance. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880063045
  • Garrard, William L., and Eicher Low. 1990. Eigenspace Design of Helicopter Flight Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada231588
  • Garrick, I. E., and S. I. Rubinow. 1946a. Flutter and Oscillating Air-Force Calculations for an Airfoil in a Two-Dimensional Supersonic Flow. NACA-TN-1158. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930081835
  • Garrick, I. E., and S. I. Rubinow. 1946b. Flutter and Oscillating Air-Force Calculations for an Airfoil in Two-Dimensional Supersonic Flow. NACA-TR-846. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930090942
  • Gaurav, Dhiman, Goro Sekou, and Moung Htang Om. 2023. “Synthesis of Control Law Based on Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Supersonic Aircraft in Presence of Noise and Uncertainties.” E3S Web of Conferences 446: 06005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344606005
  • “A Generalization for Model Reference Adaptive Control and Robust Model Reference Adaptive Control Adaptive Laws for a Class of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems with Application to Control of Wing Rock Phenomenon.” 2020. International Journal of Engineering 33 (11). https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2020.33.11b.28
  • Gera, J. 1986. “Dynamics and Controls Flight Testing of the X-29A Airplane.” In AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860009842
  • Gera, Joseph, Dominick Andrisani II, Jeffrey E. Bauer, and David B. Crawford. 1987. Real-Time Comparison of X-29A Flight Data and Simulation Data. AIAA PAPER 87-0344. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870035296
  • Gerdes, Ronald M., and Charles S. Hynes. 1972. “Factors Affecting Handling Qualities of a Lift-Fan Aircraft during Steep Terminal Area Approaches.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 17 (2): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.17.47
  • Gerken, Gary J. 1979. USAF Flying Qualities Requirements for a STOL (Short Takeoff and Landing) Transport. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada132587
  • Ghalandari, Mohammad, Ibrahim Mahariq, Farhad Ghadak, Oussama Accouche, and Fahd Jarad. 2022. “Aeroelastic Optimization of the High Aspect Ratio Wing with Aileron.” Computers, Materials & Continua 70 (3): 5569–81. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.020884
  • Ghasemikaram, Amirhossein, Abbas Mazidi, S. Ahmad Fazelzadeh, and Dieter Scholz. 2021. “Flutter Analysis of a 3D Box-Wing Aircraft Configuration.” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 22 (02): 2250016. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021945542250016x
  • Giannakeas, Ilias N., Zahra. Sharif Khodaei, and M. H. Aliabadi. 2022. “An up-Scaling Temperature Compensation Framework for Guided Wave–based Structural Health Monitoring in Large Composite Structures.” Structural Health Monitoring 22 (2): 777–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217221095415
  • Gibson, J. S. 1999. Adaptive Filtering and Estimation for Control and Target Tracking. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada386878
  • Giese, Cindy L., Gregory W. Reich, Mark A. Hopkins, and Kenneth E. Griffin. 1996. An Investigation of the Aeroelastic Tailoring for Smart Structure Concepts. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada399629
  • Gilbert, Michael G. 1987. “Sensitivity Method for Integrated Structure/active Control Law Design.” In Sensitivity Analysis in Engineering. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870009427
  • Gilbert, M., D. Schmidt, and T. Weisshaar. 1982. “Quadratic Synthesis of Integrated Active Controls for an Aeroelasticforward-Swept-Wing-Aircraft.” In Guidance and Control Conference. AIAA 1982-1544. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1982-1544
  • Gilbert, R. P., and M. Schneider. 1981. “The Linear Anisotropic Plate.” Journal of Composite Materials 15 (1): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838101500106
  • Gill, Janet A. 1995. Flight Control Computer Development through Application of Software Safety Technology,. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada305293
  • Glezer, Ari, and Anthony Leonard. 2012. Aero-Effected Flight Control Using Distributed Active Bleed. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada564094
  • Gloss, B. B., and K. E. Washburn. 1977. “Load Distribution on a Close-Coupled Wing Canard at Transonic Speeds.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770060346
  • Godwin, O. D., F. D. Frazier, and R. E. Durnin. 1964. Performance Flight Test Techniques. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0613504
  • Goland, Martin. 1945. “The Flutter of a Uniform Cantilever Wing.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 12 (4): A197-A208. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009489
  • Gong, Ligang, Qing Wang, Chaoyang Dong, and Kewei Zhong. 2019b. “Prescribed Performance Control of Morphing Aircraft Based on Switched Nonlinear Systems and Reinforcement Learning.” Measurement and Control 52 (5–6): 608–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294019830434
  • Goodrich, Kenneth H., Steven M. Sliwa, and Frederick J. Lallman. 1989. A Closed-Form Trim Solution Yielding Minimum Trim Drag for Airplanes with Multiple Longitudinal-Control Effectors. NASA-TP-2907. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890014097
  • Goradia, S. H., P. J. Bobbitt, H. L. Morgan, J. C. Ferris, and William D. Harvey. 1989. “Results of Correlations for Transition Location on a Clean-up Glove Installed on an F-14 Aircraft and Design Studies for a Laminar Glove for the X-29 Aircraft Accounting for Spanwise Pressure Gradient.” In Transonic Symposium: Theory, Application and Experiment, Volume 2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910014825
  • Govindaraj, K. S., E. G. Rynaski, and A. T. Fam. 1979. Design Criteria for Optimal Flight Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada074092
  • Grafton, S. B., W. P. Gilber, M. A. Croom, and D. G. Murri. 1982. “High Angle-of-Attack Characteristics of a Forward-Swept Wing Fighter Configuration.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820055564
  • Grantham, W. D., L. T. Nguyen, M. J. Neubauer Jr., and P. M. Smith. 1976. “Simulator Study of the Low-Speed Handling Qualities of a Supersonic Cruise Arrow-Wing Transport Configuration during Approach and Landing.” In Proc. of the SCAR Conf., Part 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770011064
  • Grauer, Jared A. 2018. “A Learn-To-Fly Approach for Adaptively Tuning Flight Control Systems.” In 2018 Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190000878
  • Grauer, Jared A., and Matthew J. Boucher. 2017. “Aeroelastic Modeling of X-56A Stiff-Wing Configuration Flight Test Data.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170001227
  • Green, J. A. 1986. Aeroelastic Tailoring of Composite Wings with External Stores. AIAA PAPER 86-1021. Stanford University. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860054140
  • Greenberg, Harry, and Leonard Sternfield. 1944. A Theoretical Investigation of Longitudinal Stability of Airplanes with Free Controls Including Effect of Friction in Control System. AD-A301267. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19960024284
  • Greene, Carl F. 1928. “An Introduction to the Problem of Wing Flutter.” Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 49-50 (1): 011010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4058514
  • Greszczuk, L. B., and H. Chao. 1975. Investigation of Brittle Fractures in Graphite-Epoxy Composites Subjected to Impact. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada012269
  • Griffin, Brian Joseph, John J. Burken, and Enric Xargay. 2010. “L1 Adaptive Control Augmentation System with Application to the X-29 Lateral/Directional Dynamics: A Multi-Input Multi-Output Approach.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20100037212
  • Griffin, K., and F. Eastep. 1981. “Active Control of Forward Swept Wings with Divergence and Flutter Aeroelastic Instabilities.” In Dynamics Specialists Conference. AIAA 1981-637. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1981-637
  • Griffin, K. E., E. C. Haerter, and B. R. Smith. 1983. Wake Characteristics and Interactions of the Canard/Wing Lifting Surface Configuration of the X-29 Forward-Swept Wing Flight Demonstrator. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada133188
  • Griffin, Charles F., and William E. Harvill. 1988. Composite Transport Wing Technology Development: Design Development Tests and Advanced Structural Concepts. NASA-CR-4177. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910019939
  • Griffis, C. A., R. A. Masumura, and C. I. Chang. 1981. “Thermal Response of Graphite Epoxy Composite Subjected to Rapid Heating.” Journal of Composite Materials 15 (5): 427–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838101500503
  • Gu, Haipeng, and Huajie Hong. 2020. “Research and Improvement on Design Method of Morphing Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1600: 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1600/1/012013
  • Guinn, Wiley A. 1984. Development of an Advanced Pitch Active Control System and a Reduced Area Horizontal Tail for a Wide-Body Jet Aircraft. NASA-CR-172283. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870008278
  • Guinn, Wiley A., Jerry J. Rising, and Walt J. Davis. 1984. Development of an Advanced Pitch Active Control System for a Wide Body Jet Aircraft. NASA-CR-172277. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870008280
  • Guinn, Wiley A., Craig S. Willey, and Michael G. Chong. 1983. Extended Flight Evaluation of a near-Term Pitch Active Control System. NASA-CR-172266. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870008279
  • Guo, Wei. 2021a. “Research on a Passenger Aircraft Flight Control System Gain Scheduler Design.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1877 (1): 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1877/1/012019
  • Guo, Wei. 2021b. “Research on the Neal&Smith Criterion Application on Aircraft Flight Control System Handling Qualities Assessment.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1877 (1): 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1877/1/012022
  • Guo, TongBiao, JunQiang Bai, Li Li, and Song Chen. 2017c. “The Morphing Trailing-Edge Wing Optimization Design of the Civil Aircraft.” SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica 48 (1): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1360/n092016-00362
  • Guo, Yaobin, Xuejian Wang, and Binjiang Zhang. 1988. Experiment Investigation on Longitudinal Characteristics of the Forward Swept Wing. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada191553
  • Guo, Hongtao, Changrong Zhang, Binbin Lv, and Li Yu. 2022. “Numerical Simulation Research on Static Aeroelastic Effect of the Transonic Aileron of a High Aspect Ratio Aircraf.” Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 132 (3): 991–1010. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2022.020638
  • Gupta, Vijay. 1998. Mechanism Based Failure Laws for Graphite/Epoxy Composites. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada397678
  • Gupta, S. C. 2023. “Wing Aerodynamic Optimization in the Presence of Interacting Canard at Subsonic and Supersonic Speeds.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 303–12. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v68i4.2016.368
  • Gupta, K. K., M. J. Brenner, and L. S. Voelker. 1987. Integrated Aeroservoelastic Analysis Capability with X-29A Analytical Comparisons. AIAA PAPER 87-0907. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870046442
  • Gurdal, Zafer. 2002. Innovative Local-Global Methods for Wing Structural Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada402571
  • Gurdal, Zafer, Raphael T. Haftka, and Layne T. Watson. 1999. Wing Structural Design by Genetic Algorithms and Homotopy Methods. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada387245
  • Gurley, J. R., Jr., and C. L. Ruhlin. 1962. Transonic Flutter Investigation of Models of a Proposed Variable-Sweep Wing. NASA-TM-X-739. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19660025705
  • Gwin, L. B. 1974. “Optimal Aeroelastic Design of an Oblique Wing Structure.” In SAE. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740045423
  • Haase, W., H. Åslund, M. Kuntz, and F. Menter. n.d. “The TUM Forward-Swept Wing Generic Aircraft.” In Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (NNFM). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39507-2_34
  • Hadidoolabi, Mostafa, and Hossein Ansarian. 2017. “Computational Investigation of Vortex Breakdown over a Pitching Delta Wing at Supersonic Speeds.” Scientia Iranica 0 (0): 0–0. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4246
  • Hahn, H. T., and R. Y. Kim. 1976. “Fatigue Behavior of Composite Laminate.” Journal of Composite Materials 10 (2): 156–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837601000205
  • Hai, Bui Huy. 2022. “Applying Model Order Reduction Algorithm for Control Design of the Digital Filter.” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 70 (11): 288–94. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/ijett-v70i11p231
  • Hallauer, W. L., Jr. 1983. Experimental Study of Active Vibration Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada148333
  • Hallissy, J. B., and T. G. Ayers. 1977. Transonic Wind-Tunnel Investigation of the Maneuver Potential of the NASA Supercritical Wing Concept, Phase 1. NASA-TM-X-3534. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770026171
  • Hammer, Natalie, and Charles B. Bright. 1998. Integrated Electric Actuator Application to Flight Control Technology. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada359476
  • Hancock, G. J. 1972. “The Induced Drag on a Rolling Wing.” Aeronautical Journal 76 (742): 617–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000044055
  • Hancock, Regis, and Gordon Fullerton. 1992. “X-29 Vortex Flow Control Tests.” In In: 1992 report to the aerospace profession; SETP Symposium, 36th, Beverly Hills, CA, Sept. 24-26, 1992, Proceedings (A93-38835 15-01). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930054849
  • Hanson, Curt, Jacob Schaefer, John J. Burken, Marcus Johnson, and Nhan Nguyen. 2011. “Handling Qualities Evaluations of Low Complexity Model Reference Adaptive Controllers for Reduced Pitch and Roll Damping Scenarios.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20110023802
  • Hanson, G. D., and R. F. Stengel. 1981. Effects of Displacement and Rate Saturation on the Control of Statically Unstable Aircraft. AIAA PAPER 81-1752. Princeton Univ. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810059678
  • Hanson, G. D., and R. F. Stengel. 1983. “Effects of Control Saturation on the Command Response of Statically Unstable Aircraft.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Aerospace Sciences Meeting. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830035279
  • Hao, Ying, Xuewen Du, and Chao Ma. 2022. “Structurally Nonlinear Fluttering of a Three-Degree-Freedom Wing with Random Disturbances.” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 23 (11): 2350122. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455423501225
  • Harper Jr. and Robert P. 1955. Flight Evaluations of Various Longitudinal Handling Qualities in a Variable-Stability Jet Fighter. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0092496
  • Harris, C. D. 1974a. Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Improved 10-Percent-Thick NASA Supercritical Airfoil. NASA-TM-X-2978. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830002761
  • Harris, C. D. 1974b. Aerodynamic Characteristics of Two 10-Percent-Thick NASA Supercritical Airfoils with Different Upper Surface Curvature Distributions. NASA-TM-X-2977. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830002756
  • Hart, K. G. 1956. Automatic Flight Control Systems for Piloted Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0108104
  • Harvill, W. E., and J. A. Kizer. 1976. Program for Establishing Long-Time Flight Service Performance of Composite Materials in the Center Wing Structure of C-130 Aircraft. Phase 4: Ground/flight Acceptance Tests. NASA-CR-145043. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770004089
  • Hatake, Susumu. 1985. “Generalized Coordinates Accounting External Term in Structural Dynamics Analysis. 1st Report Basic Concept and Calculation Scheme of Presented Generalized Coordinates.” TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series C 51 (468): 1897–1905. https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaic.51.1897
  • Hatake, Susumu. 1986. “Generalized Coordinates Affected by External Term in Structural Dynamics Analysis: 1st Report, Basic Concept and Calculation Scheme of Presented Generalized Coordinates.” Bulletin of JSME 29 (250): 1225–32. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.29.1225
  • Hayase, G. 1974. A Structural Weight Estimation Program (SWEEP) for Aircraft. Volume 6: Wing and Empennage Module. Book 3: Technical Discussion, Section 5. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada002866
  • Hayashi, Tsuyoshi. 1949. “On the Elastic Instability of Orthogonal Anisotropic Cylindrical Shells, Especially the Buckling Load Due to Compression, Bending and Torsion.” Journal of Zosen Kiokai 1949 (81): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1903.1949.85
  • Hebbar, Archana, and Abhay A. Pashilkar. 2016. “Application of Quantitative Measures for Analysing Aircraft Handling Qualities.” Defence Science Journal 66 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.66.9196
  • Heckl, Manfred A., Richard H. Lyon, Gideon Maidanik, and Eric E. Ungar. 1962. New Approaches to Flight Vehicle Structural Vibration Analysis and Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0290798
  • Heeg, Jennifer. 2006. “Control Surface Interaction Effects of the Active Aeroelastic Wing Wind Tunnel Model.” In American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20060018311
  • Heeg, Jennifer, Charles V. Spain, James R. Florance, et al. 2005. “Experimental Results from the Active Aeroelastic Wing Wind Tunnel Test Program.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20050203672
  • Heeg, Jennifer, Charles V. Spain, and J. A. Rivera. 2004. Wind Tunnel to Atmospheric Mapping for Static Aeroelastic Scaling. AIAA Paper 2004-2044. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040068163
  • Henriquez Huecas, Sergio, Mark D. White, and George Barakos. 2022. “A Turbulence Model for Flight Simulation and Handling Qualities Analysis Based on a Synthetic Eddy Method.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 67 (3): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.67.032007
  • Henry, Charles J. 1961. Hydrofoil Flutter Phenomenon and Airfoil Flutter Theory. Volume 1. Density Ratio. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0273328
  • Herrington, Shawn M., Muhammad Junayed Hasan Zahed, and Travis D. Fields. 2023. “Handling Qualities Assessment and Performance Evaluation for Unmanned Aerial Systems and Pilots.” Unmanned Systems 12 (01): 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2301385024500080
  • Herrmann, G., S. Nemat-Nasser, and S. N. Prasad. 1966. Bending-Torsional Flutter of a Swept Wing in a Highdensity, Low-Speed Flow. AIAA PAPER 66-475. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19660053477
  • Hertz, T. J., M. H. Shirk, R. H. Ricketts, and T. A. Weisshaar. 1982. “On the Track of Practical Forward-Swept Wings.” Astronautics and Aeronautics 20. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820035536
  • Hervin, Flora, and Paul Fromme. 2022. “Anisotropy Influence on Guided Wave Scattering for Composite Structure Monitoring.” Structural Health Monitoring 22 (4): 2626–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217221133284
  • Hicks, John W., James M. Cooper Jr., and Walter J. Sefic. 1987c. Flight Test Techniques for the X-29A Aircraft. NASA-TM-88289. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870012475
  • Hicks, John W., and Thomas Huckabine. 1989. Preliminary Flight-Determined Subsonic Lift and Drag Characteristics of the X-29A Forward-Swept-Wing Airplane. NASA-TM-100409. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910019863
  • Hicks, John W., Jan Kania, Robert Pearce, and Glen Mills. 1987a. Challenges in Modeling the X-29 Flight Test Performance. NASA-TM-88282. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870011558
  • Hicks, John W., Jan Kania, Robert Pearce, and Glen Mills. 1987b. Challenges in Modeling the X-29A Flight Test Performance. AIAA PAPER 87-0081. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870035128
  • Hicks, John W., and Neil W. Matheny. 1987. Preliminary Flight Assessment of the X-29A Advanced Technology Demonstrator. NASA-TM-100407. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870017473
  • Hicks, John W., and Neil W. Matheny. 1989. “Flight Tests Confirm X-29 Technologies.” Exxon Air World 41 (2, 19). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890061478
  • Hicks, John W., and Bryan J. Moulton. 1988. “Effects of Maneuver Dynamics on Drag Polars of the X-29A Forward-Swept-Wing Aircraft with Automatic Wing Camber Control.” In AIAA Flight Test Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880051510
  • Hicks, John W., and Kevin L. Petersen. 1988. Real-Time Flight Test Analysis and Display Techniques for the X-29A Aircraft. NASA-TM-101692. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890004053
  • Hicks, John W., and Kevin L. Petersen. 1989. “Real-Time Flight Test Analysis and Display Techniques for the X-29A Aircraft.” In AGARD, Flight Test Techniques. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900001550
  • Hildebrand, Francis B., and Eric Reissner. 1944. The Influence of the Aerodynamic Span Effect on the Magnitude of the Torsional-Divergence Velocity and on the Shape of the Corresponding Deflection Mode. NACA-TN-926. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930084742
  • Hill, R. D. 1987. A Survey of Aircraft Integrated Control Technology. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada186949
  • Hirai, T., and D. E. Kline. 1973. “Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Graphite-Epoxy and Carbon-Epoxy Composites.” Journal of Composite Materials 7 (2): 160–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837300700202
  • Hiyama, R. 1974. A Structural Weight Estimation Program (SWEEP) for Aircraft. Volume VII: Fuselage Module. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada002867
  • Hodges, Dewey H. 2004. A New Approach to Aeroelastic Response, Stability and Loads of Missiles and Projectiles. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada424568
  • Hodgkinson, John M. 2017. “Practical Methods for Aircraft and Rotorcraft Flight Control Design: An Optimization Based Approach.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 62 (4): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.62.047001
  • Hodgkinson, J., W. J. LaManna, and J. L. Heyde. 1976. “Handling Qualities of Aircraft with Stabilty and Control Augmentation Systems—a Fundamental Approach.” Aeronautical Journal 80 (782): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000033510
  • Hogan, D., and J. E. Rinde. 1978. Direct Drive Control Valve for Fly-by-Wire Flight Control System Actuators. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada062030
  • Hoh, Roger H., and David G. Mitchell. 1983. Tentative STOL (Short-Takeoff-and-Landing) Flying Qualities Criteria for MIL Standard and Handbook. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada132857
  • Hollowell, S., and J. Dugundji. 1982. “Aeroelastic Flutter and Divergence of Stiffness Coupled, Graphite/epoxy, Cantilevered Plates.” In 23rd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. AIAA 1982-722. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1982-722
  • Hopkins, E. J., and S. C. Yee. 1977. Effect of Wing Flexibility on the Experimental Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Oblique Wing. NASA-TM-X-3460. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770014154
  • Horowitz, Isaac, B. Golubev, T. Kopelman, and S. Britman. 1980. Research in Advanced Flight Control Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada082424
  • Horsburgh, E. M. 1911. “Proof of a Fundamental Relation in the Theory of Bending between the Bending Moment and Load Curves, or between the Deflection and Bending Moment Curves.” Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society 30: 64–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0013091500033976
  • Horton, Wilfred H., and Jean Mayers. 1965. Research in Aircraft Structures Analysis and Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0622585
  • Hortsen, J. J., R. G. den Boer, and R. J. Zwaan. 1983. Unsteady Transonic Pressure Measurements on a Semi-Span Wind Tunnel Model of a Transport-Type Supercritical Wing (LANN) Lockheed-Georgia, Air Force, NASA, and NLR Model. Part 2. Pressure Distributions (PLOTTED) and Plots of the Vibration Modes. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada130488
  • Hou, Yongbo. 2025. “A Simplified Calculation Method of Wing Deformation Loads during Flight Based on Visual Signal.” In Springer Aerospace Technology. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6235-7_5
  • Housner, J. M., and M. Stein. 1974. Flutter Analysis of Swept-Wing Subsonic Aircraft with Parameter Studies of Composite Wings. NASA-TN-D-7539. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740024243
  • Houtman, Jelle, Sebastian Timme, and Ati Sharma. 2023. “Resolvent Analysis of a Finite Wing in Transonic Flow.” Flow 3: E14. https://doi.org/10.1017/flo.2023.8
  • Houzibe, R., and S. Chaki. 2026. “A Likelihood-Based Time-of-Flight Method for Localizing Sequential Acoustic Sources in Composite Structures.” Structural Health Monitoring: 14759217261453871. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217261453871
  • How, Jonathan P. 2004. Multi-Vehicle Experimental Platform for Distributed Coordination and Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada420937
  • Howdyshell, Paul A., Jonathan C. Trovillion, Hota V. GangaRao, and Roberto Lopez-Anido. 1998. Development and Demonstration of Advanced Design Composite Structural Components. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada354825
  • Hu, Xin, Bo An, Yongke Guan, et al. 2025. “Enhancing Airfoil Design Optimization Surrogate Models Using Multi-Task Learning: Separating Airfoil Surface and Fluid Domain Predictions.” Physics of Fluids 37 (3): 037175. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0258928
  • Hu, Stephane, Victor Traisnel, Denis Walch, and Ilyass Tabiai. 2026. “In-Flight Wing Deflection Measurement on a Small-Scale Aircraft Using 2D-DIC.” Preprint, . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6790318
  • Huff, W. W., Jr. 1949. Stability and Control Characteristics of Douglas Model XF4D-1. Part i. Low Speed Flying Qualities. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0035641
  • Huffman, J. K. 1975. Effect of Vertical-Tail Location on the Aerodynamic Characteristics at Subsonic Speeds of a Close-Coupled Canard Configuration. NASA-TN-D-7947. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750019955
  • Hunn, B. A. 1953. “A Note on the Problem of Aileron Reversal at Transonic Speeds.” Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 57 (508): 237–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0368393100131128
  • Huo, Mengzhen, Haibin Duan, and Xilun Ding. 2021. “Manned Aircraft and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Heterogeneous Formation Flight Control via Heterogeneous Pigeon Flock Consistency.” Unmanned Systems 09 (03): 227–36. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2301385021410053
  • Ibrahim, Sultan Mahamdnur. 2026. “A Lightweight Digital Twin Framework for Structural Dynamic Model Updating Using Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes.” International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management 10 (2): 66–80. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.10.2.9
  • Ibren, Mohamed, Erwin Sulaeman, Amelda Dianne Andan, Yulfian Aminanda, and Abdul Karim Abd Halim. 2020. “Gust Load Alleviation of Flexible Composite Wing.” CFD letters 12 (4): 79–89. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.12.4.7989
  • Ijaz, Salman, Mirza Tariq Hamayun, Lin Yan, Hamdoon Ijaz, and Cun Shi. 2019a. “Adaptive Fault Tolerant Control of Dissimilar Redundant Actuation System of Civil Aircraft Based on Integral Sliding Mode Control Strategy.” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 41 (13): 3756–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331219835589
  • Ilcewicz, L. B., T. H. Walker, K. S. Willden, et al. 1991. Application of a Design-Build-Team Approach to Low Cost and Weight Composite Fuselage Structure. NASA-CR-4418. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940028357
  • Iliff, K. W., R. E. Maine, and S. T. Steers. 1978. Flight-Determined Stability and Control Coefficients of the F-111A Airplane. NASA-TM-72851. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780010132
  • Iliff, Kenneth W., and Kon-Sheng Charles Wang Wang. 1996. X-29A Lateral-Directional Stability and Control Derivatives Extracted from High-Angle-of-Attack Flight Data. NASA-TP-3664. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970004545
  • “Immersion and Invariance Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Attitude Control for a Coaxial Tilt-Rotor eVTOL Aircraft.” 2026. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Control Systems. https://doi.org/10.66967/jaics.2026.v2i104
  • İnan, Berk, and İbrahim Aliskan. 2025. “A Model Reference Adaptive Control Approach to Terrain Following Flight Control System.” Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 13 (2): 770–89. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1595224
  • Ingram, W. C., L. P. Yip, and E. L. Cook. 1986. Wind-Tunnel Investigation of the OMAC Canard Configuration. AIAA PAPER 86-2608. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870026764
  • Ioannis, K. Kapoulas, and K. Statharas Ioannis. 2026. “Euclid sUAV Handling Qualities Evaluation through Flight Simulation, Using Cooper-Harper Handing Qualities Rating Scale.” Drones and Autonomous Vehicles 3 (1): 10005–10005. https://doi.org/10.70322/dav.2026.10005
  • Iryani, Lenny, Andi Muhdiar Kadir, Yudi Irawadi, and Puguh Triwinanto. 2019. “Manufacturing Spar I Beam Profile of UAV Wing Structure Made of Composite Material.” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 11 (11-SPECIAL ISSUE): 556–62. https://doi.org/10.5373/jardcs/v11sp11/20193066
  • Ishmael, Stephen D., Rogers E. Smith, Dana D. Purifoy, and Rodney K. Womer. 1990. “X-29 High Angle of Attack.” In Symposium of the 1990 report to the Aerospace Profession; Society of Experimental Test Pilots. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920033428
  • Ishmael, S. D., and T. Wierzbanowski. 1985. X-29 Initial Flight Test Results. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860060204
  • Isogai, Koji. 1988. “Aeroelastic tailoring.” Journal of the Japan Society for Composite Materials 14 (3): 96–101. https://doi.org/10.6089/jscm.14.96
  • Ito, Yuma, and Hidetsugu Iwashita. 2017. “Characteristics of Steady Aerodynamics and Aerodynamic Interactions between Wings of a Canard-Configuration WIG.” Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers 25 (0): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe.25.63
  • Ivler, Christina M., Kevin Truong, Declan Kerwin, et al. 2022. “Development and Flight Validation of Proposed Unmanned Aerial System Handling Qualities Requirements.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 67 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.67.012002
  • Jaeger, L. G., and A. W. Hendry. 1959. “The Analysis of Rectangular Diagrids by Anisotropic Plate Theory.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 13 (3): 387–92. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1959.12063
  • Janardhan, Srinivasan, and Ramana V. Grandhi. 2003. Multidisciplinary Optimization of an Aircraft Wing/Tip Store in the Transonic Regime. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada417106
  • Jarvis, C. R. 1975. “An Overview of NASA’s Digital Fly-by-Wire Technology Development Program.” In Description and Flight Test Results of the NASA F-8 Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750010174
  • Jarvis, C. R., and K. J. Szalai. 1981. “Ground and Flight Test Experience with a Triple Redundant Digital Fly by Wire Control System.” In NASA. Langley Research Center Advan. Aerodyn. and Active Controls. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810010480
  • Jategaonkar, Ravindra V. 2023. “Aerodynamic Modeling and System Identification from Flight Data.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v57i1.2005.674
  • Jegley, Dawn C., and Harold G. Bush. 1997. Structural Test Documentation and Results for the McDonnell Douglas All-Composite Wing Stub Box. NASA-TM-110204. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970022698
  • Jegley, Dawn C., and Harold G. Bush. 2001. Structural Testing of a Stitched/Resin Film Infused Graphite-Epoxy Wing Box. NASA/TM-2001-210846. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010047392
  • Jegley, Dawn C., Harold G. Bush, and Andrew E. Lovejoy. 2001a. “Evaluation of the Structural Response and Failure of a Full-Scale Stitched Graphite-Epoxy Wing.” In AHS Structures Specialists’’ Meeting. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20030012585
  • Jegley, Dawn C., Andrew E. Lovejoy, and Harold G. Bush. 2001b. “Structural Response and Failure of a Full-Scale Stitched Graphite-Epoxy Wing.” In American Society of Civil Engineers. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010022369
  • Jegley, Dawn C., and Dulnath D. Wijayratne. 2004. “Validation of Design and Analysis Techniques of Tailored Composite Structures.” PhD diss., NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040200977
  • Jenks, G. E., H. F. Henry, and J. Roskam. 1977. Flight Test Results for a Separate Surface Stability Augmented Beech Model 99. NASA-CR-143839. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770014139
  • Jenney, G. D., and H. W. Schreadley. 1984. A Digital Linear Position Sensor for Flight Control Actuation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada144283
  • Jenney, Gavin D., Harry W. Schreadley, and Carl N. Allbright. 1982. Flight Test of a G. E. and DCI Direct Drive Fly-By-Wire Flight Control System. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada117244
  • Jensen, D. W., E. F. Crawley, and J. Dugundji. 1982. “Vibration of Cantilevered Graphite/Epoxy Plates with Bending-Torsion Coupling.” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 1 (3): 254–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168448200100305
  • Jensen, W. R., W. E. Falby, and N. Prince. 1966. Matrix Analysis Methods for Anisotropic Inelastic Structures.. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0486295
  • Ji, Zhehan, Tongqing Guo, Di Zhou, Zhiliang Lu, and Binbin Lyu. 2024b. “Time-Domain Analysis of Body Freedom Flutter Based on 6DOF Equation.” Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 138 (1): 489–508. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.029088
  • Jia, Dongsheng, Pengcheng Feng, Yi Song, et al. 2026. “A Concurrent Optimization of Structural Topology and 3D Printing Fiber Path Planning for Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Composites.” Engineered Science. https://doi.org/10.30919/es2092
  • Jiang, Runpei, Yun Tian, Peiqing Liu, Shiqi Gao, and Qiulin Qu. 2018b. “Transonic Buffet Control Research on Supercritical Wing Using Rear-Mounted Bump.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 31 (5): 04018053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000875
  • Jiang, Feng, Xiaoyan Tong, Jing Sun, Suwen Zhang, and Jianzhi Deng. 2022. “Aerodynamic Study of Canard Parameter Configuration Principle for UAV.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2235 (1): 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2235/1/012001
  • Jianhong, Wang. 2022. “Closed-Loop Identification for Aircraft Flutter Model Parameters.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 94 (7): 1117–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-08-2021-0254
  • Jianhong, Wang, and Ricardo A. Ramirez-Mendoza. 2023. “Direct Data Driven Safety Control for Aircraft Flight System-Part 1: The Theory Case.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 95 (6): 958–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-12-2022-0342
  • Jianhong, Wang, and Wang Yanxiang. 2026. “Nonlinear Geometric Multivariable Control for Unmanned Aircraft Flight System.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 98 (6–7): 756–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2025-0009
  • Jiao, Xin, and Ju Jiang. 2015. “Learning Control Law of Mode Switching for Hypersonic Morphing Aircraft Based on Type-2 TSK Fuzzy Neural Network.” International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing 5 (4): 301–6. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijmlc.2015.v5.524
  • Jing, Li, Shenjun Qi, and Feng Wang. 2020. “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flying Qualities Flight Test Evaluation Technique in Approaching and Landing Phase.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 887 (1): 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/887/1/012042
  • Johnson, W. F. 1965. Research on Accelerated Reliability Testing Methods Applicable to Nonelectronic Components of Flight Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0617567
  • Johnson, David T. 1972. Evaluation of Energy Maneuverability Procedures in Aircraft Flight Path Optimization and Performance Estimation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0754909
  • Johnson, R. W., and R. R. June. 1972. Application Study of Filamentary Composites in a Commercial Jet Aircraft Fuselage. NASA-CR-112110. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720025911
  • Johnson, R. W., and J. E. McCarty. 1977. Design and Fabrication of Graphite-Epoxy Bolted Wing Skin Splice Specimens. NASA-CR-145216. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770023236
  • Johnston, Donald E., Irving L. Ashkenas, and Jeffrey R. Hogge. 1974. Investigation of Flying Qualities of Military Aircraft at High Angles of Attack. Volume I. Technical Results. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada014366
  • Jones, R. T., and J. W. Nisbet. 1976. “Aeroelastic Stability and Control of an Oblique Wing.” Aeronautical Journal 80 (788): 365–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000034138
  • Jonsson, Eirikur, Cristina Riso, Christopher A. Lupp, Carlos E. S. Cesnik, Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, and Bogdan I. Epureanu. 2019. “Flutter and Post-Flutter Constraints in Aircraft Design Optimization.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 109: 100537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.04.001
  • Jou, W. H., and R. W. Metcalfe. 1984. Pseudospectral Calculations of Two-Dimensional Transonic Flow (Task 1). Numerical Investigation of VTOL Aerodynamics (Task 2). Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada150123
  • Julian L. Center. 1975. Systematic Design of Modular Estimators for Aircraft Navigation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/adb006719
  • Jun-yi, Zhang, Su Xin-bing, Jiang Wen, and Zhao Xi-wei. 2021. “Influence of Basic Airfoil Layout on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Forward-Swept Wing.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1102 (1): 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1102/1/012004
  • Jusko, Tim, and Tom Berger. 2026. “Development and Evaluation of New Mission Task Elements to Assess Low-Level Handling Qualities.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 71 (2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.71.022007
  • Jutte, Christine, and Bret K. Stanford. 2014. Aeroelastic Tailoring of Transport Aircraft Wings: State-of-the-Art and Potential Enabling Technologies. NASA/TM-2014-218252. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140006404
  • K.А., Juyyan CHjou Neusypin. 2023. “UAV Control with Active Disturbance Suppression for the Safety Landing on an Aircraft Carrier.” Automation Modern Techologies: 155–61. https://doi.org/10.36652/0869-4931-2023-77-4-155-161
  • Kalinowski, Miłosz J. 2015. “Structural Optimization of Box Wing Aircraft.” Archive of Mechanical Engineering 62 (1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/meceng-2015-0003
  • Kalnins, Arturs. 1968. Static, Free Vibration, and Stability Analysis of Thin, Elastic Shells of Revolution. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0686446
  • Kalugin, V. T., S. N. Voropaev, and D. K. Nazarova. 2022. “Flow Features and Aerodynamic Analysis of the Canard Missiles.” Russian Aeronautics 65 (3): 533–40. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068799822030126
  • Kamaletdinova, Lilia, and Anton Romanov. 2024. “Control System Design.” System Analysis & Mathematical Modeling 6 (1): 60–77. https://doi.org/10.17150/2713-1734.2024.6(1).60-77
  • Kambayashi, Keita, and Nozomu Kogiso. 2026. “Preliminary Design of Airflow-Coordinated Compliant Morphing Airfoils (Aerostructural Topology Optimization Based on Static Aeroelastic Deformations).” Mechanical Engineering Journal 13 (4-S3): 26-00075-26-00075. https://doi.org/10.1299/mej.26-00075
  • Kang, Youngshin, Bumjin Park, Am Cho, Chang-Sun Yoo, Sam-Ok Koo, and Min-Jea Tahk. 2016. “Development of Flight Control System and Troubleshooting on Flight Test of a Tilt-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 17 (1): 120–31. https://doi.org/10.5139/ijass.2016.17.1.120
  • Kannemans, H. 1995. “Flight Testing of a Wing Deflection Measurement Method.” In 20th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. AIAA 1995-3434. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-3434
  • Kapania, Rakesh K., J. Issac, D. Macmurdy, and Guru P. Guruswamy. 1997. Wing Weight Optimization under Aeroelastic Loads Subject to Stress Constraints. NASA-CR-204315. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970021182
  • Karal, Michael. 2001. AST Composite Wing Program: Executive Summary. NASA/CR-2001-210650. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010033249
  • Karimi Kelayeh, Ruhollah, and Mohammad Hasan Djavareshkian. 2024. “Aerodynamic Assessment of a Control Strategy Based on Twist Morphing Wing in a Flying Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 37 (1): 04023087. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-5073
  • Karniadakis, George E. 2004. Structural Integrity of a Fighter Aircraft Undergoing Dynamic Combat Maneuvers. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada420891
  • Kashitani, Masashi, Yoshihiro Takita, Thai Duong Nguyen, and Masato Taguchi. 2019. “Preliminary Study on Flight/Wind Tunnel Testing of Aircraft Model.” Proceedings of the Dynamics & Design Conference 2019 (0): 446. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmedmc.2019.446
  • Kasim Biber and Trenton White. 2019. “Transonic Airfoil Design and Optimization for an Unmanned Air Vehicle Concept.” Journal of Mechanics Engineering and Automation 9 (6). https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5275/2019.06.004
  • Kataoka, Kouichi, Osamu DOl, and Michihiro Sato. 1986. “Residual Stress Measurement of Laminated Anisotropic Plate by Strain Gauge Method in Consideration of Strain Gauge Stiffness and Gauge Base Thickness.” Bulletin of JSME 29 (248): 393–99. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.29.393
  • Kaul, Upender K., and Nhan T. Nguyen. 2018. “Drag Characterization Study of Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap.” Journal of Fluids Engineering 140 (10): 101108. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040070
  • Kaygan, Erdoğan, and Ceren Ulusoy. 2018. “Effectiveness of Twist Morphing Wing on Aerodynamic Performance and Control of an Aircraft.” Journal of Aviation 2 (2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.482507
  • Kearns, J. P. 1962. FLUTTER SIMULATION. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0650981
  • Kehoe, M. W. 1984. Highly Maneuverable Aircraft Technology (HiMAT) Flight-Flutter Test Program. NASA-TM-84907. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860017818
  • Kehoe, Michael W. 1987. Flutter Clearance of the F-14 Variable-Sweep Transition Flight Experiment Airplane, Phase 1. NASA-TM-88287. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870018230
  • Kehoe, Michael W., Lisa J. Bjarke, and Edward J. Laurie. 1990. “An in-Flight Interaction of the X-29A Canard and Flight Control System.” In AIAA Dynamics Specialists Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900039765
  • Kehoe, M. W., and J. F. Ellison. 1985. Flutter Clearance of the Schweizer 1-36 Deep-Stall Sailplane. NASA-TM-85917. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850024805
  • Kennedy, John M. 1991. “Damage Tolerance of Woven Graphite/Epoxy Buffer Strip Panels.” Journal of Composite Materials 25 (9): 1218–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839102500908
  • Kevrekidis, Ioannis G. 2002. Enabling-Dynamic Simulators: Stability, Bifurcation and Control Computations for Distributed Parameter Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada405411
  • Key, David L. 1971. The Generation of a Military Specification for Flying Qualities of Piloted V/STOL Aircraft-MIL-F-83300. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0725746
  • Khalil, A., and N. Fezans. 2020. “Gust Load Alleviation for Flexible Aircraft Using Discrete-Time Preview Control.” Aeronautical Journal 125 (1284): 341–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2020.85
  • Khan, Numan, and Aniello Riccio. 2024. “A Systematic Review of Design for Additive Manufacturing of Aerospace Lattice Structures: Current Trends and Future Directions.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 149: 101021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101021
  • Khankalantary, Saeed, H. Rezaee Ahvanouee, and Hassan Mohammadkhani. 2021. “L1 Adaptive Integrated Guidance and Control for Flexible Hypersonic Flight Vehicle in the Presence of Dynamic Uncertainties.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 235 (8): 1521–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596518211003400
  • Kheiri, M., and M. Riazat. 2025. “Aeroelastic Stability of Imperfectly Supported High-Aspect-Ratio Wings.” Aeronautical Journal 129 (1340): 2741–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2025.10028
  • Kieffer, John. 2006. Multiscale Modeling for the Design of Autonomic Healing Structural Composite Materials (MEANS). Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada462805
  • Kim, Eung-Tai, and In-Ho Choi. 2015. “A Study on Fly-By-Wire Helicopter Control Law Design Using SAS Actuators.” Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics 23 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2015.23.1.067
  • Kim, Chongsup, Changho Ji, Giok Koh, and Nagsun Choi. 2022. “Review on Flight Control Law Technologies of Fighter Jets for Flying Qualities.” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 24 (1): 209–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-022-00560-6
  • Kim, Y., and K. T. Kang. 2025. “Analysis of Aerodynamic Characteristics for Canard Controlled Missile with Free-Rotating Tail.” Journal of computational fluids engineering 30 (1): 82–94. https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2025.30.1.082
  • Kim, Donggyun, Byungjin Lee, Young Jae Lee, and Sangkyung Sung. 2016b. “Flight Control Test of Quadrotor-Plane with Hybrid Flight Mode of VTOL and Fast Maneuverability.” Journal of Institute of Control Robotics and Systems 22 (9): 759–65. https://doi.org/10.5302/j.icros.2016.16.0088
  • Kim, Soo-Hyun, Hyungki Shin, and Hyung-Joon Bang. 2016a. “Bend-Twist Coupling Behavior of 10 MW Composite Wind Blade.” Composites Research 29 (6): 369–74. https://doi.org/10.7234/composres.2016.29.6.369
  • Kim, Chong-Sup, Jaemin Sung, Inseok Yang, Myungsoo Kang, and In-Je Cho. 2017. “Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control Law Development of High Performance Fighter Aircraft.” Journal of Institute of Control Robotics and Systems 23 (9): 786–802. https://doi.org/10.5302/j.icros.2017.17.0075
  • Kineyko, Wallace. 1982. Advanced Flight Control Actuation System (AFCAS: E/P). Fabrication and Design Verification Testing of a Dual Mode Electro/Pneumatic Actuator for the T-2C Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada119003
  • Kirmse, Tania. 2016. “Recalibration of a Stereoscopic Camera System for in-Flight Wing Deformation Measurements.” Measurement Science and Technology 27 (5): 054001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/5/054001
  • Kirsch, Jared R., Nima Fathi, and William J. Rider. 2025. “Application of SciML-Adapted PCMM to Deep Neural Network Surrogate Model Used for Aerodynamic Coefficient Prediction.” Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification 10 (4): 041001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071802
  • Kish, Brian A., William B. Mosle, Seo Adam, Cabiati John, Kromberg Roberto, and James. 1997. A Limited Flight Test Investigation of Pilot-Induced Oscillation Due to Elevator Rate Limiting (HAVE LIMITS). Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada286959
  • Kishi, Y., Masahiro Kanazaki, Yoshikazu Makino, and Kisa Matsushima. 2016. “Planform Dependency on Airfoil Design Results for Supersonic Wing in Supersonic and Transonic.” Journal of Flow Control Measurement & Visualization 04 (01): 38–48. https://doi.org/10.4236/jfcmv.2016.41004
  • Kisslinger, Robert L., and Michael J. Wendl. 1971. Survivable Flight Control System. Studies, Analyses and Approach. Supplement for Control Criteria Studies. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0727762
  • Kizildeniz, Merve, and Emre Kiyak. 2025. “Genetic Algorithm Optimized Artificial Immune System for Fault Detection in Flight Control Systems.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 97 (8): 977–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-03-2025-0127
  • Klafin, J. 1988. “Integrated Thrust Vectoring on the X-29A.” In Aircraft Design, Systems and Operations Conference. AIAA 1988-4499. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1988-4499
  • Klein, R. W., M. Lapins, R. P. Martorella, and M. Sturm. 1982. “Control Law Development for a Close-Coupled Canard, Relaxed Static Stability Fighter.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820036249
  • Klema, Virginia. 1981. Mathematical Software for Linear Control and Estimation Theory. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada106000
  • Klimczyk, Witold Artur, and Zdobyslaw Jan Goraj. 2019. “Analysis and Optimization of Morphing Wing Aerodynamics.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 91 (3): 538–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-12-2017-0289
  • Klotzsche, M. 1984. ACEE Composite Structures Technology. NASA-CR-172359. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870019180
  • Klyde, David, Chuck Harris, Peter M. Thompson, and Edward N. Bachelder. 2004. System Identification Methods for Improving Flutter Flight Test Techniques. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada426452
  • Knauss, J. F., and R. H. Stone. 1982. Demonstration of Repairability and Repair Quality on Graphite/epoxy Structural Subelements. Northrop Corp. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830039267
  • Knight, Marvin. 1982. “Three-Dimensional Elastic Moduli of Graphite/Epoxy Composites.” Journal of Composite Materials 16 (2): 153–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838201600206
  • Knox-Seith, J. K. 1963. A Redundancy Technique for Improving the Reliability of Digital Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0438911
  • Ko, Dong-hyeon, Ji-soo Kang, and Keeyoung Choi. 2019. “Design and Performance Verification of L1 Adaptive Flight Control Law Considering the Change of Center of Gravity for Unmanned Tailless Aircraft.” Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 47 (2): 114–21. https://doi.org/10.5139/jksas.2019.47.2.114
  • Kobelev, Vladimir. 2019. “Approximate Static Aeroelastic Analysis of Composite Wings.” Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures 15 (2): 365–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/mmms-02-2018-0019
  • Koenig, K. 1984. Transonic Merging Separated Flows. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada150667
  • Koh, Cg, and Jm Kelly. 1989. “Applicability of the Southwell Plot to Shear Deformable Columns.” Journal of Testing and Evaluation 17 (5): 287–91. https://doi.org/10.1520/jte11130j
  • Kohara, Makoto, Hiroyuki Tomoeda, and Hiromistu Kawazoe. 2016. “1408 a Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Forward Swept Wing at Low Speed Flight.” Proceedings of Conference of Chugoku-Shikoku Branch 2016.54 (0): _1408-1_-_1408-2_. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmecs.2016.54._1408-1_
  • Kohnhorst, Lloyd L., and Domenic A. Magnacca. 1980. Design and Test of a Hydra-Optic Flight Control Actuation System (HOFCAS) Concept. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada094688
  • Kolar, C. J., and J. W. Lile. 1971. F-5E Flutter Model Test Report. Phase I. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada377254
  • Komarov, Bohdan, and Dmytro Zinchenko. 2023. “The Aerodynamic Behavioral Study of Canard Plane with Fan Wing Configuration.” Mechanics of Gyroscopic Systems, no. 45: 118–35. https://doi.org/10.20535/0203-3771452023290873
  • Komnatska, Marta M., and Dmytro P. Bondarenko. 2017. “Intelligent Flight Control System Design for the Small UAV Based on the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System.” Upravlâûŝie sistemy i mašiny, no. 4 (270): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.15407/usim.2017.04.024
  • Konar, A. F., J. K. Mahesh, and B. Kizilos. 1974. Digital Flight Control System for Tactical Fighter. Volume 1. Digital Flight Control System Analysis. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada002320
  • Kong, Yeseul, Jun Young Jeon, Hyeonwoo Nam, and Gyuhae Park. 2025. “Structural Damage Detection on Non-Isotropic Composite Plates with Steady-State Acoustic Wavenumber Variations.” Structural Health Monitoring: 14759217251339812. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217251339812
  • Kopecki, Grzegorz. 2016. “Control Computers Diagnostics for UAV Flight Control System.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 88 (3): 420–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-10-2012-0187
  • Kopecki, Grzegorz Henryk. 2021. “Aircraft Control with the Use of Model Reference Adaptive Control.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 93 (9): 1395–1400. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-11-2020-0248
  • Kornev, A. V., M. B. Ambrozhevich, V. A. Sereda, and K. V. Migalin. 2021. “Aerodynamic Compensation Methods for Aeroelastic Divergence of Forward-Swept Wing.” Russian Aeronautics 64 (1): 28–36. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068799821010049
  • Kosyanchuk, Vladislav, Nikolay Ivanovich Sel’vesyuk, and Alexey Kulchak. 2015. “Aircraft Control Law Reconfiguration.” Aviation 19 (1): 14–18. https://doi.org/10.3846/16487788.2015.1015290
  • Kosyanchuk, V., S. Zheltov, and E. Zybin. 2021. “Aircraft Flight Control System Fault Tolerance under Structural and Parametric Uncertainties.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1864 (1): 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1864/1/012005
  • Kota, Sridhar, Joel Hetrick, and Laxman Saggere. 1997. Design of a Variable Stiffness Spar. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada361152
  • Kou, Jiaqing, and Weiwei Zhang. 2021. “Data-Driven Modeling for Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 125: 100725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100725
  • Kraft, Christopher C., Jr., and J. P. Reeder. 1948. Measurements of the Longitudinal Stability and Control and Stalling Characteristics of a North American P-51H Airplane (AAF No. 4-64164). NACA-RM-SL8B24. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Langley Aeronautical Lab. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20050028754
  • Krause, James M., Pramod P. Khargonekar, and Gunter Stein. 1990. Robust Adaptive Control: Stability and Asymptotic Performance. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada219259
  • Krener, A. J. 2001. Bifurcations of Control Systems with Application to Flutter. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada430327
  • Krone, N., Jr. 1980a. “Forward Swept Wing Design.” In The evolution of aircraft wing design; Proceedings of the Symposium. AIAA 1980-3047. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-3047
  • Krone, N., Jr. 1980b. “Forward Swept Wing Flight Demonstrator.” In Aircraft Systems Meeting. AIAA 1980-1882. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1882
  • Kuang, Derong, Li Hu, Yang Fang, Qiong Huang, and Wen Sun. 2025. “Nonlinear Vibration Control of a Slender Beam with Twin-Source Excitation and Spatially Distributed Nonlinear Energy Sinks Simultaneously.” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics: 2750175. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455427501756
  • Kumar, Ratish, Rajiv Kumar, and M. J. Nigam. 2022. “Performance Accretion in Delay Compensation of Networked Control System Using Markov Approach-Based Randomness Estimation in Smith Predictor.” International Journal of System Dynamics Applications 11 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsda.302634
  • Kurade, Rajan B., L. Venkatakrishnan, and G. Jagadeesh. 2021. “Control of Shock-Induced Vortex Breakdown on a Delta-Wing-Body Configuration in the Transonic Regime.” Aeronautical Journal 126 (1299): 768–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.99
  • Kurita, Mitsuru, Shunsuke Koike, and Kazuyuki Nakakita. 2019. “In-Flight Measurement of Wing Deformation.” Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences 62 (2): 108–11. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.62.108
  • Kurita, Mitsuru, Shunsuke Koike, Kazuyuki Nakakita, and Kazuya Masui. 2013. “In-Flight Wing Deformation Measurement.” In 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. AIAA 2013-967. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-967
  • Kurzhals, P. R. 1978. Active Controls in Aircraft Design. AD-A063793. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790008693
  • Kusni, M., M. Widiramdhani, and B. K. Hadi. 2021. “Sensitivity Study and Structural Optimization of an Aircraft Wing in the Maximum-Stress and Flutter Constraints.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1173 (1): 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1173/1/012058
  • Kuttieri, R. A., and M. Sinha. 2023. “Unstable Aircraft Parameter Estimation Using Neural Partial Differentiation.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 201–16. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v64i3.2012.465
  • Kuvshinov, Vladimir Mikhailovich. 2016a. “Design of Integral Control Algorithms for Fly-by-Wire Control System of Advanced High-Speed Helicopter.” TsAGI Science Journal 47 (1): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2016017070
  • Kuvshinov, Vladimir Mikhailovich. 2016b. “Design of Integral Control Algorithms for the Lateral Channel of the Fly-by-Wire Control System of Advanced High-Speed Helicopters.” TsAGI Science Journal 47 (8): 865–98. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2017020079
  • Kuvshinov, Vladimir Mikhailovich, Grigoryi Andreevich Lazurin, and Rim Maratovich Murzagalin. 2019. “Design of Active Control System of Passenger Aircraft for Alleviation of Extreme Negative Load Factors at Flight in Turbulent Atmosphere Using Laser Atmosphere Scanning along Aircraft Flight Heading.” TsAGI Science Journal 50 (6): 643–63. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2020033338
  • Kuvshinov, Vladimir Mikhailovich, and Veniamin Aleksandrovich Leontiev. 2019. “Design of Fly-by-Wire Control System Algorithms for Single-Rotor Helicopter with Tail Rotor at Hovering Mode.” TsAGI Science Journal 50 (3): 251–83. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2019031121
  • Kuz’mina, Svetlana, Fanil Ishmuratov, Valery Popovskii, and Oleg Karas’. 2020. “Analysis of Dynamic Response and Flutter Suppression System Effectiveness of a Long-Haul Aircraft in Transonic Flight Mode.” Vestnik Moskovskogo aviatsionnogo instituta 27 (1): 108–21. https://doi.org/10.34759/vst-2020-1-108-121
  • Kuzu, Ahmet, Seta Bogosyan, and Metin Gokasan. 2015. “Predictive Input Delay Compensation with Grey Predictor for Networked Control System.” International Journal of Computers Communications & Control 11 (1): 67. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2016.1.1577
  • Kwon, Hyunseok, Yurim Park, Jin-Hyuk Kim, and Chun-Gon Kim. 2019. “Embedded Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor–based Wing Load Monitoring System for Composite Aircraft.” Structural Health Monitoring 18 (4): 1337–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719843772
  • Lai, Wenduo. 2024. “The Working Principles of Canard Wings and Its Aerodynamic Advantages and Effects on Aircraft.” Applied and Computational Engineering 91 (1): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/91/20241080
  • Lakshminarayana, B. 1962. “Lift Distribution and Lift-Induced Drag Ratio of a Finite Wing in an Infinite Cascade.” Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 66 (624): 785–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0368393100077920
  • Lamar, J. E. 1978. “Strake-Wing Analysis and Design.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780057982
  • Lamar, J. E., and N. T. Frink. 1981a. “Aerodynamic Features of Designed Strake-Wing Configurations.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810053680
  • Lamar, J. E., and N. T. Frink. 1981b. Experimental and Analytical Study of the Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of Analytically and Empirically Designed Strake-Wing Configurations at Subcritical Speeds. NASA-TP-1803. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810016505
  • Lamar, J. E., and J. M. Luckring. 1979. “Recent Theoretical Developments and Experimental Studies Pertinent to Vortex Flow Aerodynamics, with a View towards Design.” In AGARD High Angle of Attack Aerodyn.. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790013848
  • Lamar, J. E., R. T. Schemensky, and C. S. Reddy. 1980. “Development of a Vortex-Lift-Design Method and Application to a Slender Maneuver-Wing Configuration.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800034146
  • Lan, C. E. 1986. Calculating Aerodynamic-Stability Derivatives. LAR-13471. University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860000337
  • Lan, C. Edward, and J. B. Tseng. 1987. Calculation of Aerodynamic Characteristics at High Angles of Attack for Airplane Configurations. NASA-CR-180678. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870017427
  • Lapins, M., R. W. Klein, R. P. Martorella, J. Cangelosi, and W. R. Neely Jr. 1982. “Piloted Simulator Evaluation of a Relaxed Static Stability Fighter at High Angle-of-Attack.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820055547
  • Larson, Richard R. 1987. AFTI/F-111 MAW Flight Control System and Redundancy Management Description. NASA-TM-88267. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870007386
  • Laub, Alan J. 1991. Numerical Methods for Closed-Loop Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada248481
  • Lawrence, B., C. R. Theodore, W. Johnson, and T. Berger. 2018. “A Handling Qualities Analysis Tool for Rotorcraft Conceptual Designs.” Aeronautical Journal 122 (1252): 960–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2018.43
  • Lee, E. B. 1977. The Study of Distributive Parameter Systems for Flight Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada038281
  • Lee, U. 1995. “Equivalent Dynamic Beam–rod Models of Aircraft Wing Structures.” Aeronautical Journal 99 (990): 450–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000028815
  • Lee, T. 2016. “Impact of Gurney Flaplike Strips on the Aerodynamic and Vortex Flow Characteristic of a Reverse Delta Wing.” Journal of Fluids Engineering 138 (6): 061104. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032301
  • Lee, T., and L. S. Ko. 2018. “Ground Effect on the Vortex Flow and Aerodynamics of a Slender Delta Wing.” Journal of Fluids Engineering 140 (7): 071104. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039232
  • Lee, Yebin, Younggun Lee, Jong-Bum Kim, and Donghyun Cho. 2023. “Wind Tunnel Test Research for Aerodynamic Characteristic Analysis of Urban Air Mobility with Canard.” Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 51 (11): 751–59. https://doi.org/10.5139/jksas.2023.51.11.751
  • Lee, J. H., and S. Mall. 1989. “Strength of Composite Laminate with Reinforced Hole.” Journal of Composite Materials 23 (4): 337–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838902300403
  • Lee, Sangjoon, and Haris Moazam Sheikh. 2025. “Airfoil Optimization Using Design-by-Morphing with Minimized Design-Space Dimensionality.” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 13 (1): 108–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwaf124
  • Lehman, Larry, and Ronald Stearman. 1977. Analytical Flutter Studies of a Subsonic, Actively Controlled, Variable Geometry Wind Tunnel Model. Volume I.. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada039245
  • Lei, Shuai, Junli Wang, Tuolei Li, Wensheng Zhang, Zhigui Ren, and Hong Cui. 2020. “Effect of Ply Angle on Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity of High-Aspect-Ratio Composite Wing.” Journal of Vibroengineering 22 (4): 959–70. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2019.20968
  • Leicester, Robert H. 1970. “Southwell Plot for Beam-Columns.” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 96 (6): 945–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcea3.0001329
  • Leitch, Harry, Olivia Stodieck, and Jie Yuan. 2024. “Effects of Coupled Thickness Variation on the Aeroelastic Performance of Continuous Tow Sheared Composite Wing.” Preprint, . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4786120
  • Lemay, S. P., S. M. Batill, and R. C. Nelson. 1988. “Leading Edge Vortex Dynamics on a Pitching Delta Wing.” In AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880053508
  • Lemley, Clark E. 1968. Design Criteria for the Prediction and Prevention of Panel Flutter. Volume 2. Background and Review of State of the Art. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0840550
  • Lendraitis, Martynas. 2019. “Investigation of Performance Gains on a Sailplane with Morphing Wing Trailing Edge.” Mechanika 25 (4): 299–303. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.mech.25.4.22325
  • Lesoinne, Michael. 2007. High Performance and High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Simulation of Fixed Wing Aircraft with Deployable Control Surfaces. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada481320
  • Li, Jinxian. 2023. “Aerodynamics-Based Forward-Swept Wing Structure Optimization.” Applied and Computational Engineering 10 (1): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/10/20230134
  • Li, Li, Junqiang Bai, Tongbiao Guo, Xiaolong He, and Ziyuan Fu. 2018b. “Aerodynamic Design of the Supersonic Aircraft Wing-Shape and Wing-Twist Optimization.” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 19 (2): 340–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0046-y
  • Li, Daochun, Shijun Guo, Tariq Osman Aburass, Daqing Yang, and Jinwu Xiang. 2016a. “Active Control Design for an Unmanned Air Vehicle with a Morphing Wing.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 88 (1): 168–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-12-2013-0234
  • Li, Hongkun, Rui Huang, Yonghui Zhao, and Haiyan Hu. 2018e. “Maneuver Load Alleviation for High Performance Aircraft Robust to Flight Condition Variations.” Journal of Vibration and Control 25 (5): 1044–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546318810033
  • Li, Lei-Gang, Jin Liang, Xiang Guo, Cheng Guo, Hao Hu, and Zheng-Zong Tang. 2014. “Full-Field Wing Deformation Measurement Scheme for in-Flight Cantilever Monoplane Based on 3D Digital Image Correlation.” Measurement Science and Technology 25 (6): 065202. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/6/065202
  • Li, Yu, Xiaoxiong Liu, Ruichen Ming, Shaoshan Sun, and Weiguo Zhang. 2021d. “Robust Dynamic Inversion Control of Flight Control System Based on L1 Adaptive Structure.” Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University 39 (5): 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20213950995
  • Li, Wesley W., and Chan-Gi Pak. 2014. “Aeroelastic Optimization Study Based on the X-56A Model.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140010035
  • Li, Xuefei, Zhansen Qian, Chunpeng Li, Xianhong Xiang, and Pengbo Xu. 2019e. “Research on Morphing Scheme and Forward-Swept Wing Parameters Based on a Forward-Swept Wing Morphing Aircraft.” In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3305-7_108
  • Li, Kecheng, Jingping Shi, Xiaoxiong Liu, Hongyuan Zhu, and Lei Wang. 2025f. “Research on Adaptive Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Fault-Tolerant Flight Control System Based on Sideslip Trim Strategy.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 97 (4): 369–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-08-2024-0233
  • Li, DongFeng, YiXing Wang, Gang Chen, and YueMing Li. 2018d. “An Automated Aeroelastic Performance Prediction Method in Time Domain for Transonic Aeroelastic Tailoring.” SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica 48 (11): 114701. https://doi.org/10.1360/sspma2018-00072
  • Li, Xuejun, Zhiyue Xiong, and Shuguang Zhang. 2025d. “INDI Application in Flight Control Law Design of Civil Aircraft.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 3044 (1): 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3044/1/012002
  • Lian, Hongzhen, and Hongli Cao. 2026. “Force Control of Hydraulic Actuator Based on Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion.” Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics 15 (1): 259–75. https://doi.org/10.5890/jand.2026.03.015
  • Liao, Peng, Wei Song, Peng Du, and Hang Zhao. 2021. “Multi-Fidelity Convolutional Neural Network Surrogate Model for Aerodynamic Optimization Based on Transfer Learning.” Physics of Fluids 33 (12): 127121. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0076538
  • Libeskind, Mark, Joseph Minecci, S. L. Huang, and Edward J. McQuillen. 1973. NAVAIRDEVCEN Graphite-Epoxy Composite Wing for BQM-34E: Static Test Results. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada326073
  • Librescu, L., and S. Thangjitham. 1988. “The Influence of the Warping Restraint on the Spanwise Lift Distribution of Swept Forward Composite Wing Structures.” In 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. AIAA 1988-2209. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1988-2209
  • Librescu, L., and S. Thangjitham. 1989. “The Warping Restraint Effect in the Critical and Subcritical Static Aeroelastic Behavior of Swept Forward Composite Wing Structures.” In SAE Technical Paper Series, vol. 1. SAE International. https://doi.org/10.4271/891056
  • Lichota, Piotr. 2023. “Unstable Tilt-Rotor Maximum Likelihood Wavelet-Based Identification from Flight Test Data.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 95 (8): 1275–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2023-0013
  • Liefer, Randall K. 1990. “Fighter Agility Metrics.” PhD diss., Kansas Univ.. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900020073
  • Lifshits, Yu. B., and O. S. Ryzhov. 1978. “Transonic Flows around a Carrying Airfoil Profile.” Fluid Dynamics 13 (1): 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01094463
  • Lin, Charrissa Y., and Edward F. Crawley. 1995. “Design Considerations for a Strain Actuated Adaptive Wing for Aeroelastic Control.” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 6 (3): 403–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x9500600312
  • Lind, Rick C., Martin J. Brenner, and Lawrence C. Freudinger. 1997. Improved Flight Test Procedures for Flutter Clearance. NASA/CR-97-207068. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980018481
  • Lindsay, E. Earl, and J. L. Jordan. 1975. Experimental Static Stability Studies of Several Tactical Missile Configurations at Mach Numbers from 1.76 to 3.01. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada009137
  • Liu, Ying. 2018. “Comparison of the Passive and Active Control Gust Alleviation of a Flying-Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Engineering 2019 (13): 421–23. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.9016
  • Liu, Ting-Rui. 2019. “Divergent Instability Control of Aeroelastic System Driven by Aerodynamic Forces under Disturbance Based on Discrete Sliding Mode Control Algorithms.” Measurement and Control 52 (7–8): 1072–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294019858106
  • Liu, Haojie, Rui Huang, Yonghui Zhao, and Haiyan Hu. 2017b. “Reduced-Order Modeling of Unsteady Aerodynamics for an Elastic Wing with Control Surfaces.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 30 (3): 04016083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000682
  • Liu, Xiang, and Qin Sun. 2016. “Gust Load Alleviation with Robust Control for a Flexible Wing.” Shock and Vibration 2016: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1060574
  • Liu, Xiang, and Qin Sun. 2017. “Improved LQG Method for Active Gust Load Alleviation.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 30 (4): 04017006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000712
  • Liu, Yang, and Xuetao Tian. 2019. “Design and Implementation of UAV’s Flight Control System Test Platform.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 677 (5): 052056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/677/5/052056
  • Liu, Shu, Chao Zhou, Hui Shao, Chang Liu, and Senbin You. 2023f. “Research on Automatic Flight Control System Flight Mode Operation Logic.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2658 (1): 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2658/1/012051
  • Lo, James T. 1978. Detection, Estimation and Control on Group Manifolds. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada050578
  • Lo, James T. 1979. Detection, Estimation, and Control on Group Manifolds. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada077707
  • Lo, James T. 1980. Detection, Estimation, and Control on Group Manifolds. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada092386
  • Lo, James T. 1981. Detection, Estimation, and Control on Group Manifolds. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada113019
  • Lock, W. P., W. R. Petersen, and G. B. Whitman. 1975. “Mechanization of and Experience with a Triplex Fly-by-Wire Backup Control System.” In Description and Flight Test Results of the NASA F-8 Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750010176
  • Lockwood Taylor, J. 1942. “Minimum Induced Drag.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 14 (7): 196–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb030921
  • Lokos, William A. 1990. “Predicted and Measured in-Flight Wing Deformations of a Forward-Swept-Wing Aircraft.” In Society of Flight Test Engineers. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920053312
  • Lombardi, G., M. Salvetti, A. Talamelli, M. Salvetti, A. Talamelli, and G. Lombardi. 1997. “Shock-Wave/boundary-Layer Interaction in Transonic Flow around a Forward-Swept Wing.” In 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference. AIAA 1997-1838. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-1838
  • Lombardi, G., and A. Vicini. 1994. “Induced Drag Prediction for Wing-Tail and Canard Configurations through Numerical Optimisation.” Aeronautical Journal 98 (976): 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000049733
  • Loos, Alfred C., and George S. Springer. 1983. Curing of Graphite/Epoxy Composites. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada130071
  • Loth, John L., and Robert E. Boyle. 1969. Optimum Loading on Nonplanar Wings at Minimum Induced Drag. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0704502
  • Lovejoy, Andrew E., and Stephen J. Scotti. 2019. “Potential Weight Benefits of IM7/8552 Hybrid Thin-Ply Composites for Aircraft Structures.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200002432
  • Ludeña Cervantes, Tito J., Seong H. Choi, and Byoung S. Kim. 2020. “Flight Control Design Using Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion with Fixed-Lag Smoothing Estimation.” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 21 (4): 1047–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00273-8
  • Lv, Binbin, Pengxuan Lei, Hongtao Guo, Xiping Kou, and Li Yu. 2019. “Modal Optimization Approach for Composite Aeroelastic Wing Model Based on a Derivative-Free BFGS Method.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1300 (1): 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1300/1/012085
  • Lyapunov, S. V. 1993. “Nonplanar Wings with Minimum Induced Drag.” Fluid Dynamics 28 (2): 238–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01051213
  • Lyu, Yongxi, Weiguo Zhang, Jingping Shi, Xiaobo Qu, and Huakun Chen. 2019. “Design of Control Law of Post Stall Maneuver under Unsteady Aerodynamics Based on Improved Dynamic Inverse Method.” Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University 37 (3): 523–31. https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20193730523
  • M., W. L., and Eliahu I. Jury. 1959. “Sampled-Data Control Systems.” OR 10 (2): 110. https://doi.org/10.2307/3007623
  • Ma, Biao, and Mou Chen. 2023. “Safety Flight Envelope Calculation and Protection Control of UAV Based on Disturbance Observer.” Security and Safety 2: 2023020. https://doi.org/10.1051/sands/2023020
  • Mackall, Dale A., and James G. Allen. 1989. “A Knowledge-Based System Design/information Tool for Aircraft Flight Control Systems.” In AIAA Computers in Aerospace Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900023436
  • Mackall, Dale A., and James G. Allen. 1991. “A Knowledge-Based System Design/information Tool for Aircraft Flight Control Systems.” In AGARD, Knowledge Based System Applications for Guidance and Control. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910015825
  • Mackall, D. A., M. D. Pickett, L. J. Schilling, and C. A. Wagner. 1988. The NASA Integrated Test Facility and Its Impact on Flight Research. NASA-TM-100418. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880011793
  • Maewal, A. 1984. Finite Element Analysis of Nonlinear Oscillations and Flutter of Shells of Revolution. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada149071
  • Mahmood, Ahmad. 2025. “Control of Wing Aeroelastic System in Presence of Wind Gust Using Logarithmic Sliding Mode Control.” Journal of Vibration and Control 32 (5–6): 1191–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463241312815
  • Mahulkar, Vishal V. 2010. Structural Technology Evaluation and Analysis Program (STEAP). Delivery Order 0037: Prognosis-Based Control Reconfiguration for an Aircraft with Faulty Actuator to Enable Performance in a Degraded State. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada534168
  • Malcom, L. G., and J. H. Husband. 1976. Digital Flight Control for the NASA 737 Airplane. AIAA PAPER 76-1912. Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760058464
  • Malik, Bilal, Suhail Akhtar, and Jahanzeb Masood. 2017. “Influence of Flight Control Law on Spin Dynamics of Aerodynamically Asymmetric Aircraft.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics: 963. https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl.55.3.963
  • Mamedov, Oktai S., Sergey E. Paryshev, Valery N. Popovsky, and Vsevolod Igorevich Smyslov. 2018. “Active Flutter Suppression of a High Aspect Ratio Wing Aircraft.” TsAGI Science Journal 49 (3): 289–97. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2018027114
  • Mamonova, E. E., V. G. Soudakov, and A. V. Voyevodin. 2019. “Vortex Flow on the Wing of Aircraft and Flow Control to Improve Lift Properties.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1268 (1): 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1268/1/012067
  • Mann, M. J., R. L. Campbell, and J. C. Ferris. 1983. Aerodynamic Design for Improved Maneuverability by the Use of Three-Dimensional Transonic Theory. AIAA PAPER 83-1859. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830057468
  • Mann, M. J., R. L. Campbell, and J. C. Ferris. 1984. Aerodynamic Design for Improved Manueverability by Use of Three-Dimensional Transonic Theory. NASA-TP-2282. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840010093
  • Mann, M. J., and C. E. Mercer. 1985. A Forward-Swept Wing Configuration Designed for High Maneuverability by Use of Three-Dimensional Transonic Theory. AIAA PAPER 85-4069. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860026297
  • Mann, M. J., and C. E. Mercer. 1986. Forward-Swept Wing Configuration Designed for High Maneuverability by Use of a Transonic Computational Method. NASA-TP-2628. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870002269
  • Mansour, A. 1970. “Effective Flange Breadth of Stiffened Plates under Axial Tensile Load or Uniform Bending Moment.” Journal of Ship Research 14 (01): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.1970.14.1.8
  • Mant, I. S. 1972. “Integrity of Flight Control System Design.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 44 (7): 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb034920
  • Manzoor, Mubashra, Adnan Maqsood, and Ammar Hasan. 2016. “Quadratic Optimal Control of Aerodynamic Vectored UAV at High Angle of Attack.” International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE) 9 (3): 70. https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v9i3.8119
  • Mar, James W., and K. Y. Lin. 1979. “Characterization of Splitting Process in Graphite/Epoxy Composites.” Journal of Composite Materials 13 (4): 278–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837901300402
  • Marcus, Steven I. 1994. Stochastic Adaptive Estimation and Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada289088
  • Mareca Rios, R., J. Montes Barrenetxea, X. Esquisabel Alegria, and W. Sterr. 2023. “Efficient Flight Control by Use of EJ200 Thrust Vectoring.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 219–31. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v61i1.2009.635
  • Marr, Roger L., and W. E. B. Roderick. 1974. “Handling Qualities Evaluation of the XV-15 Tilt Rotor Aircraft.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 20 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.20.23
  • Marske, James J. 1975. “Handling and Performance Characteristics of Swept-Forward Flying Wing Aircraft.” SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. https://doi.org/10.4271/750548
  • Masini, L., S. Timme, and A. J. Peace. 2019. “Analysis of a Civil Aircraft Wing Transonic Shock Buffet Experiment.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 884: A1. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.906
  • Maślanka, Wojciech, Stanisław Kachel, and Michał Frant. 2025. “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of NACA 64-208 Airfoil at Transonic Speed.” International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE) 18 (2): 53. https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v18i2.25886
  • Mason, M. L., and F. J. Capone. 1983. Aeropropulsive Characteristics of Twin Single-Expansion-Ramp Vectoring Nozzles Installed with Forward-Swept Wings and Canards. NASA-TP-2133. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830013890
  • Mateer, George C., H. Lee Seegmiller, Thomas J. Coakley, Lawrence A. Hand, and Joachim Szodruch. 1987. An Experimental Investigation of a Supercritical Airfoil at Transonic Speeds. AIAA PAPER 87-1241. NASA Ames Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870057640
  • Matsuki, Hidenobu, Taishi Nishiyama, Yuya Omori, Shinji Suzuki, Kazuya Masui, and Masayuki Sato. 2018. “Flight Test of Fault-Tolerant Flight Control System Using Simple Adaptive Control with PID Controller.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 90 (1): 210–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-03-2016-0052
  • Mazaheri, Karim, Ashkan Nejati, and Kiarash Charlang Kiani. 2017. “The Application of Suction and Blowing in Performance Improvement of Transonic Airfoils with Shock Control Bump.” Scientia Iranica 24 (1): 274–92. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4032
  • McCormack, Gerald M., and Victor I. Stevens Jr. 1947. An Investigation of the Low-Speed Stability and Control Characteristics of Swept-Forward and Swept-Back Wing in the Ames 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. NACA-RM-A6K15. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930085677
  • McEneaney, William M. 1999. Nonlinear Robust Control and Estimation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada383810
  • McGough, John, Kurt Moses, Walter Platt, Gibson Reynolds, and John Strole. 1974. Digital Flight Control System Redundancy Study. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada006411
  • McKeehen, Phillip D., and Thomas J. Cord. 1997. Simulation Study of VISTA/F-16 Maneuverability Enhancement Using Forebody Vortex Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada327802
  • McKillip, Robert. 1987. “Periodic Model-Following for the Control-Configured Helicopter.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 36 (3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.36.4
  • McKinney, J. M. 1972. “Mixed-Mode Fracture of Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy Composites.” Journal of Composite Materials 6 (1): 164–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837200600115
  • McWilliam, Michael K., Frederik Zahle, Antariksh Dicholkar, David Verelst, and Taeseong Kim. 2018. “Optimal Aero-Elastic Design of a Rotor with Bend-Twist Coupling.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1037: 042009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/4/042009
  • Mei, Hanfei, and Victor Giurgiutiu. 2018. “Guided Wave Excitation and Propagation in Damped Composite Plates.” Structural Health Monitoring 18 (3): 690–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718765955
  • Meirovitch, Leonard. 1995. Performance Improvement of Composite Wings through Aeroelastic Tailoring and Modern Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada293689
  • Melville, Michael, Götz Bramesfeld, Amir Kolaei, and Hekmat Alighanbari. 2020. “Aeroelastic Tailoring for Gust-Energy Extraction.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 33 (4): 04020041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001158
  • Memon, W. A., M. D. White, G. D. Padfield, N. Cameron, and L. Lu. 2021. “Helicopter Handling Qualities: A Study in Pilot Control Compensation.” Aeronautical Journal 126 (1295): 152–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.87
  • Meng, Min, and Xian Jiang. 2025. “Research and Application of Wing Load Behavior in Stall Flight Test.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 3026 (1): 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3026/1/012013
  • Mengzhu, Li, Yan Zhitao, and Wang Anqi. 2026. “Composite Laminate Damage Identification via Gabor-Based Anisotropic Filter Enhanced Attention ConvLSTM Network.” Structural Health Monitoring: 14759217251405486. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217251405486
  • Menon, P. K., and M. Yousefpor. 1996. Design of Nonlinear Autopilots for High Angle of Attack Missiles. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada436537
  • Miele, A. 1976. Minimum Mass Structures with Specified Natural Frequencies. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada053727
  • Mihaila-Andres, Mihai, Paul-Virgil Rosu, Ciprian Larco, Maria Demsa, Lucian Constantin, and Radu Pahonie. 2019. “Preliminary Design of Aeroelastically Tailored Wing Box Structures with Bend-Twist Coupling.” ITM Web of Conferences 24: 02010. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20192402010
  • Mijovic, Jovan. 1985. “Interplay of Physical and Chemical Aging in Graphite/Epoxy Composites.” Journal of Composite Materials 19 (2): 178–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838501900205
  • Miller, E. 1983. “Performance of a Forward Swept Wing Fighter Utilizing Thrust Vectoring.” In Aircraft Design, Systems and Technology Meeting. AIAA 1983-2482. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-2482
  • Miner, D. D., and B. B. Gloss. 1975. Flow Visualization Study of Close-Coupled Canard Wing and Strake Wing Configuration. NASA-TM-X-72668. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750013175
  • Mingong, Sha, and Ying Sun. 2022. “Experimental Study of Damage to the Structure of Composite Materials of High-Speed Aircraft from Raindrop Impact Erosion.” Trudy MAI, no. 126. https://doi.org/10.34759/trd-2022-126-10
  • Miranda, Rafael Morales, and Jorge Henrique Bidinotto. 2025. “A Method for PIO Suppression in Aircraft with Fly-By-Wire Controls: System Development and Validation via Flight Simulator Tests.” Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management 17: e0825. https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v17.1368
  • Mishra, Padmaja, Ajay Kumar Yadav, and Rajesh Kumar Patjoshi. 2025. “Delay Compensation and Stability Analysis of Networked Control System: An IoT Prospective.” International Journal of Systems, Control and Communications 16 (2): 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijscc.2025.145789
  • Missoum, Samy. 2012. Computational Design Optimization under Uncertainty of Systems with Nonlinear Aeroelastic Constraints. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada582315
  • Mitchell, David G., Thomas T. Myers, Gary L. Teper, and Donald E. Johnston. 1980. Investigation of High-Angle-of-Attack Maneuver-Limiting Factors. Part 3. Appendices: Aerodynamic Models. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada101648
  • Miura, Hirokazu, and Douglas J. Neill. 1992. “Survey: Applications of Structural Optimization Methods to Fixed Wing Aircraft and Spacecraft.” In In: AIAA(USAF)NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 4th, Cleveland, OH, Sept. 21-23, 1992, Technical Papers. Pt. 1 (A93-20301 06-66). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930036331
  • Miyakawa, Junichi, Takeshi Ohnuki, and Nobuhiko Kamiya. 1991. “Aero-Structural Integrated Design of Forward Swept Wing.” In SAE Technical Paper Series, vol. 1. SAE International. https://doi.org/10.4271/912021
  • Miyasato, Yoshihiko. 1992. “Adaptive Control for Non-Minimum Phase System with Time Delay by Periodic Time-Varying Feedback.” Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers 28 (9): 1141–43. https://doi.org/10.9746/sicetr1965.28.1141
  • Mkhoyan, Tigran, Nisarg R. Thakrar, Roeland De Breuker, and Jurij Sodja. 2022. “Morphing Wing Design Using Integrated and Distributed Trailing Edge Morphing.” Smart Materials and Structures 31 (12): 125025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/aca18b
  • Mochizuki, Saya, and Gouji Yamada. 2018. “Aerodynamic Characteristics and Flow Field of Delta Wings with the Canard.” MATEC Web of Conferences 145: 03010. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814503010
  • Moes, Timothy R., Gregory K. Noffz, and Kenneth W. Iliff. 2000. Results from F-18B Stability and Control Parameter Estimation Flight Tests at High Dynamic Pressures. NASA/TP-2000-209033. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010002099
  • Moes, Timothy R., Mark S. Smith, and Eugene A. Morelli. 2003. Flight Investigation of Prescribed Simultaneous Independent Surface Excitations for Real-Time Parameter Identification. NASA/TM-2003-212029. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20030107571
  • Mohan, G. S. S. S. S. V. Krishna. 2020. “Auto-Tuning Smith-Predictive Control of Delayed Processes Based on Model Reference Adaptive Controller.” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 12 (SP4): 1224–30. https://doi.org/10.5373/jardcs/v12sp4/20201597
  • Monaghan, R. C. 1981. Description of the HiMAT Tailored Composite Structure and Laboratory Measured Vehicle Shape under Load. NASA-TM-81354. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810009523
  • Moni, Abhijith, Weigang Yao, and Hossein Malekmohamadi. 2024. “Data-Driven Reduced-Order Modeling for Nonlinear Aerodynamics Using an Autoencoder Neural Network.” Physics of Fluids 36 (1): 016105. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0177577
  • Montgomery, R. C., and D. B. Price. 1974. “Management of Analytical Redundancy in Digital Flight Control Systems for Aircraft.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740055499
  • Moon, Young I. 1996. Geodesic Wing Structural Optimization and Dynamic Analysis. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada361169
  • Moore, M., and D. Frei. 1983. “X-29 Forward Swept Wing Aerodynamic Overview.” In Applied Aerodynamics Conference. AIAA 1983-1834. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-1834
  • Moriya, Kazumasa. 1982. “Finite Element Analysis of Cracked Plate Subjected to out-of-Plane Bending, Twisting and Shear.” Bulletin of JSME 25 (206): 1202–10. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.25.1202
  • Morozov, D. V., and S. F. Chermoshentsev. 2019. “Method of Improving the Functional Dependability of the Control Systems of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Flight in Case of Failure in the Onboard Test Instrumentation.” Dependability 19 (1): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2019-19-1-30-35
  • Morris, Don H. 1977. Mixed-Mode Fracture of Graphite/Epoxy Composites. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada049528
  • Morton, Daniel, Artemis Xu, Alberto Matute, and Robert F. Shepherd. 2023. “Autonomous Material Composite Morphing Wing.” Journal of Composite Materials 57 (4): 711–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983231151397
  • Mottershead, John E., and J. E. Cooper. 2012. Extension of Flutter Boundaries Using in-Flight Receptance Data. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada571493
  • Moul, Martin T., and Lawrence W. Brown. 1959. Effect of Artificial Pitch Damping on the Longitudinal and Rolling Stability of Aircraft with Negative Static Margins. NASA-MEMO-5-5-59L. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980228212
  • Moul, Martin T., and Andrew R. Wineman. 1952. Longitudinal Stability and Control Characteristics from a Flight Investigation of a Cruciform Canard Missile Configuration Having an Exposed Wing-Canard Area Ratio of 16:1. NACA-RM-L52D24a. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930086980
  • Mourey, D. J. 1979. Study of the Feasibility Aspects of Flight Testing an Aeroelastically Tailored Forward Swept Research Wing on a BQM-34F Drone Vehicle. NASA-CR-159149. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800001956
  • Muir, Rowan Eveline, Abel Arredondo-Galeana, and Ignazio Maria Viola. 2017. “The Leading-Edge Vortex of Swift Wing-Shaped Delta Wings.” Royal Society Open Science 4 (8): 170077. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170077
  • Mukhopadhyay, Vivek, and Michael R. Sorokach. 2015. “Composite Structure Modeling and Analysis of Advanced Aircraft Fuselage Concepts.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160006012
  • Murphy, Patrick C. 1996. Closed-Loop System Identification Experience for Flight Control Law and Flying Qualities Evaluation of a High Performance Fighter Aircraft. NASA/TM-1998-207995. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980200994
  • Murphy, Patrick C. 1999. “Closed-Loop System Identification Experience for Flight Control Law and Flying Qualities Evaluation of a High Performance Fighter Aircraft.” In System Identification for Integrated Aircraft Development and Flight Testing, RTO Meeting Proceedings 11. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990032463
  • Murphy, A. C., R. P. Peloubet, R. M. Bolding, and J. J. Hosek. 1976. Design, Fabrication, Testing and Analysis of Torsion Free Wing Trend Flutter Models. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/adb013257
  • Murri, D. G., M. A. Croom, and L. T. Nguyen. 1983. High Angle-of-Attack Flight Dynamics of a Forward-Swept Wing Fighter Configuration. AIAA PAPER 83-1837. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830057448
  • Murri, D. G., L. T. Nguyen, and S. B. Grafton. 1984. Wind-Tunnel Free-Flight Investigation of a Model of a Forward-Swept-Wing Fighter Configuration. NASA-TP-2230. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840009116
  • Nagaraja, K., G. Lakin, and J. Bartley. 1981. “Subcritical Flutter and Oscillatory Pressure Testing of a Full-Scale 727 Inboard Aileron in a Low-Speed Wind-Tunnel.” In Dynamics Specialists Conference. AIAA 1981-656. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1981-656
  • Nagarathna, K., and Girish S. Deodhare. 2023. “Development of Fault Tolerant Flight Control System for Handling Actuator Stuck Faults.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 161–71. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v75i2.2023.58
  • Nakamura, Masayoshi. 1982. “Experiment of a Shockless Transonic Airfoil Partially Modified from an Arbitrary Airfoil.” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 51 (12): 4084–90. https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.51.4084
  • Nam, C., P. C. Chen, D. D. Liu, R. M. Yurkovich, and J. Urnes. 2000. Adaptive Reconfigurable Control Based on a Reduced Order System Identification for Flutter and Aeroservoelastic Instability Suppression. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada379722
  • Nangia, R., and M. Palmer. 2002. “Flying-Wings (Blended Wing Bodies) with Aft & Forward Sweep, Relating Design Camber & Twist to Longitudinal Control.” In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. AIAA 2002-4616. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-4616
  • Nangia, R., M. Palmer, and C. Tilmann. 2003. “Unconventional High Aspect Ratio Joined-Wing Aircraft with Aft- and Forward-Swept Wing-Tips.” In 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA 2003-605. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-605
  • Napolitano, Marcello R. 1996. Estimation of the Longitudinal and Lateral-Directional Aerodynamic Parameters from Flight Data for the NASA F/A-18 HARV. NASA-CR-200251. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19960014815
  • Napolitano, Marcello R. 2002. YF22 Model with on-Board on-Line Learning Microprocessors-Based Neural Algorithms for Autopilot and Fault-Tolerant Flight Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada400639
  • Napolitano, Marcello R., and Joelle M. Spagnuolo. 1993. Determination of the Stability and Control Derivatives of the NASA F/A-18 HARV Using Flight Data. NASA-CR-194838. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940020331
  • Narayanan, Kamala, Sai Balaji Jai Kumar, and Raghu Nanjundegowda. 2026. “Model Reference Adaptive Control for Wing-Rock Suppression in Delta-Wing Aircraft.” E3S Web of Conferences 692: 02008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669202008
  • Naresh, Jonna, and J. Srinivas. 2024. “Aeroelastic Stability and Design of Laminated Composite Sandwich MRE Plates Using Surrogate Metaheuristics Optimization.” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 25 (16): 2550166. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455425501664
  • Nath, Sri R., and Sah D. S. Ana. 2017. “Aerodynamic Analysis of Forward Swept Wing Using Prandtl-D Wing Concept.” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 54 (2): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/ijett-v54p212
  • Navrátil, Jan. 2017. “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of an Airliner Elastic Wing.” ITM Web of Conferences 14: 00006. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171400006
  • Nazarenko, V. V., and T. P. Nevezhina. 1972. “Measurement of the Pressure at an Oscillating Aileron in a Transonic Flow.” Fluid Dynamics 7 (2): 354–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01186488
  • Neal, T. P., and Rogers E. Smith. 1970. An in-Flight Investigation to Develop Control System Design Criteria for Fighter Airplanes. Volume 1. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0880426
  • Nejati, A., and K. Mazaheri. 2017. “Application of the Adjoint Optimisation of Shock Control Bump for ONERA-M6 Wing.” European Journal of Computational Mechanics 26 (5–6): 557–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17797179.2017.1386022
  • Nelson, Robert C., and Thomas N. Mouch. 1978. The Influence of Aerodynamic Interference on High Angle of Attack Wind Tunnel Testing. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada056045
  • Neu, Thomas F., and Shih L. Huang. 1973. NAVAIRDEVCEN Graphite-Epoxy Composite Wing for BQM-34E; Stress and Vibration Analysis. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada325972
  • Newkirk, John A. 1979. Computational Issues in Linear Least-Squares Estimation and Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada089350
  • Nguyen, Dinh Son. 2019. “Design of Lattice Structure for Additive Manufacturing in CAD Environment.” Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing 13 (3): JAMDSM0057-JAMDSM0057. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2019jamdsm0057
  • Nguyen, L. T., W. P. Gilbert, and S. B. Grafton. 1979. “Control Considerations for CCV Fighters at High Angles of Attack.” In AGARD Aerodyn. Characteristics of Controls. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800006901
  • Nguyen, Luat T., William P. Gilbert, and Marilyn E. Ogburn. 1980. Control-System Techniques for Improved Departure/spin Resistance for Fighter Aircraft. NASA-TP-1689. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800020743
  • Nguyen, Luat T., and William P. Gilert. 1990. Impact of Emerging Technologies on Future Combat Aircraft Agility. AIAA PAPER 90-1304. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900048974
  • Nguyen, Nhan, Upender Kaul, Sonia Lebofsky, Eric Ting, Daniel Chaparro, and James Urnes. 2015. “Development of Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap for Performance Adaptive Aeroelastic Wing.” In SAE AeroTech Congress & Exhibition. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150023531
  • Nguyen, Nhan, and James Urnes Sr. 2012. “Aeroelastic Modeling of Elastically Shaped Aircraft Concept via Wing Shaping Control for Drag Reduction.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170005442
  • Nibbelink, Bruce D., and David A. Peters. 1993. “Flutter Calculations for Fixed and Rotating Wings with State-Space Inflow Dynamics.” In In: AIAA(ASME)ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 34th and AIAA/ASME Adaptive Structures Forum, La Jolla, CA, Apr. 19-22, 1993, Technical Papers. Pt. 1 (A93-33876 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930049880
  • Nicholas, W. U., G. L. Naville, J. E. Hoffschwelle, J. K. Huffman, and P. F. Covell. 1984. An Evaluation of the Relative Merits of Wing-Canard, Wing-Tail, and Tailless Arrangements for Advanced Fighter Applications. General Dynamics Corp. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840062226
  • Nield, George C., IV. 1981. A Model-Following Technique for Insensitive Aircraft Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada106742
  • Nikkhoo, Amirfarhang, and Ali Esmaeili. 2023. “Numerical Study of Geometrical Properties of Full-Span Tubercle Leading Edge Wing at Post-Stall Condition.” Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 16 (9). https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.16.09.1755
  • Nikolaev, Nikolay V. 2019. “Optimization of Airfoils along High-Aspect-Ratio Wing of Long-Endurance Aircraft in Trimmed Flight.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 32 (6): 04019090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001086
  • Niu, X. J., and X. Zhang. 2022. “Curvature-Constrained Layup Optimization to Improve Buckling Resistance of Composite Laminates.” Mechanics of Solids 57 (6): 1500–1511. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0025654422060103
  • Noll, T., R. Calico, and F. Eastep. 1983. “Control of Forward Swept Wing Aeroelastic Instabilities Using Activefeedback Systems.” In Guidance and Control Conference. AIAA 1983-2220. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-2220
  • Nonweiler, T. R. F. 1960. “Lift-Curve Slope and Induced Drag Factors of Large Aspect Ratio Straight-Tapered Wings.” Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 64 (592): 224–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0368393100072485
  • Northrop Aircraft INC Hawthorne CA. 1952. Methods of Analysis and Synthesis of Piloted Aircraft Flight Control Systems. Volume 1. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0024361
  • Norton, William J. 1990. Structures Flight Test Handbook. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada257262
  • Norwood, J. S. 1992. Proven Force–Proof of Concept for the Composite Wing. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada249881
  • “Numerical Analysis of the Flow Pattern and Vortex Breakdown over a Pitching Delta Wing at Supersonic Speeds.” 2017. Прикладная механика и техническая физика, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.15372/pmtf20170303
  • “Numerical and Experimental Determination of Canard Controlled Missile Aerodynamic Coefficients in Subsonic Regime.” 2019. Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette 26 (3). https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20180724143418
  • Obilanade, Didunoluwa, Peter Törlind, and Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck. 2025. “Supporting Design for Additive Manufacturing: Insights from Product Development Practices in the Aerospace Industry.” Design Science 11: e50. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2025.10042
  • Ogburn, Marilyn E., John V. Foster, and Keith D. Hoffler. 1991. Use of Piloted Simulation for High-Angle-of-Attack Agility Research and Design Criteria Development. AIAA-91-2954. Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910063214
  • Ogunvoul, Blessing D., Evgeniya A. Balanchuk, and Konstantin S. Kandyba. 2017. “Fault Diagnosis of an Aircraft Control Surfaces with an Automated Control System.” Civil Aviation High TECHNOLOGIES 20 (4): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.26467/2079-0619-2017-20-4-41-51
  • Okumoto, Victor H., and William K. Elsanker. 1973. STOL Tactical Aircraft Investigation, Externally Blown Flap. Volume 5. Part 3. Stability and Control Derivative Accuracy Requirements and Effects of Augmentation System Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0767182
  • Olivett, Anthony, Peter Corrao, and M. Amin Karami. 2021. “Flow Control and Separation Delay in Morphing Wing Aircraft Using Traveling Wave Actuation.” Smart Materials and Structures 30 (2): 025028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/abd347
  • Olsen, James J. 1965. Local Aerodynamic Parameters for Supersonic and Hypersonic Flutter Analyses. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0626928
  • Olsen, J. J. 1966. Demonstration of a Transonic Box Method for Unsteady Aerodynamics of Planar Wings. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0647369
  • Om, Soung-Young, Ki-Hong Park, and Yoon-Ho Kim. 2020. “Implementation of Flight Control Computer Redundancy System in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” Journal of Contents Computing 2 (1): 95–103. https://doi.org/10.9728/jcc.2020.06.2.1.95
  • Orkwis, Paul D. 1995. A Study of Asymmetric Vortex Shedding behind Missiles at High Angle of Attack Using Dynamic Solution Adaptive Meshes. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada304583
  • Osipov, Konstantin Anatolievich. 2016. “Analysis of Subsonic Vortex Flow over the Model of Maneuverable Aircraft Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods.” TsAGI Science Journal 47 (7): 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2017019838
  • Osipov, Konstantin Anatolievich. 2017. “Control of Vortex Flow over a Maneuverable Aircraft Model Using Nose Flaps at Large Angles of Attack.” TsAGI Science Journal 48 (8): 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2018026350
  • Osipov, Konstantin Anatolievich. 2019. “Asymmetric Vortex Flow with Double Vortex Breakdown on a Delta Wing at Zero Sideslip.” TsAGI Science Journal 50 (2): 155–67. https://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2019030599
  • Ostheimer, A. J., and R. G. Giguere. 1963. Design and Development of a Flight Path Control System for Helicopters/ VTOL Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0402379
  • Otsuka, Keisuke, and Kanjuro Makihara. 2017. “Aeroelastic Analysis of Deployable Wing Using Reduced Order Multibody Structural Model.” Proceedings of the Dynamics & Design Conference 2017 (0): 715. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmedmc.2017.715
  • Ouyang, Yan, Kaichun Zeng, Xiping Kou, Yingsong Gu, and Zhichun Yang. 2021b. “Experimental and Numerical Studies on Static Aeroelastic Behaviours of a Forward-Swept Wing Model.” Shock and Vibration 2021 (1): 5535192. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5535192
  • Oza, Vishu K., and Hardik R. Vala. 2021. “Airfoil Analysis and Effect of Wing Shape Optimization on Aerodynamic Parameters in a Steady Flight.” Global Journal of Researches in Engineering: 43–53. https://doi.org/10.34257/gjredvol21is1pg43
  • Ozbek, Emre, Selcuk Ekici, and Tahir Hikmet Karakoç. 2024. “A Comprehensive Review of State-of-Art FishBAC – Fishbone Active Camber Morphing Wing Surfaces–: A Promising Morphing Method.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 96 (7): 983–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-04-2024-0096
  • Ozdil, Feridun, and Leif A. Carlsson. 1992. “Mode I Interlaminar Fracture of Interleaved Graphite/Epoxy.” Journal of Composite Materials 26 (3): 432–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839202600306
  • ÖZkan, Göktürk Memduh. 2020. “Experimental Investigation of the Flow Characteristics around a NACA0012 Airfoil Subjected to Stall and Post-Stall Conditions.” Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 35 (2): 369–78. https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.792424
  • Packard, Andrew, Pete Seiler, and Gary Balas. 2009. Development of Analysis Tools for Certification of Flight Control Laws. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada531629
  • Padovan, Joseph. 1973. “Inplane and Bending Fields of Anisotropic Generally Laminated Plate Strips.” Journal of Composite Materials 7 (4): 536–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837300700412
  • Padovan, J. 1974. “An Exact Solution for Bending Fields in Anisotropic Balanced Ply Laminated Plate Strips.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 41 (1): 294–96. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3423249
  • Pagano, N. J. 1974. “On the Calculation of Interlaminar Normal Stress in Composite Laminate.” Journal of Composite Materials 8 (1): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837400800106
  • Palkin, M. V., and M. V. Zenchenko. 2025. “Adaptive Stabilization Methodic of Aircraft Based on Parametrical Object Identification in Flight-Mode.” Achievements of Modern Radioelectronics: 42–48. https://doi.org/10.18127/j20700784-202509-06
  • Palm, Tod, Mary Mahler, Chandu Shah, et al. 2000. BMI Sandwich Wing Box Analysis and Test. AIAA Paper 2000-1342. Northrop Grumman Corp. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20000052504
  • Pan, Ya Lin, and Jun Huang. 2019. “Effect of Aerodynamic Configuration Parameters on Lateral-Directional Stability of Double-Swept Flying Wing Aircraft.” Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management: e3919. https://doi.org/10.5028/jatm.v11.1074
  • Pang, Zi Yang, Carlos E. Cesnik, and Ella M. Atkins. 2014. “In-Flight Wing Deformation Measurement System for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.” In 55th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA 2014-0330. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0330
  • Panuntun, R., O. Wahyunggoro, S. Herdjunanto, A. R. Rafsanzani, and N. Setiawan. 2020. “Networked Control System in Quadrotor Altitude Control with Time Delay Compensation.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1577 (1): 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1577/1/012031
  • Papadales Jr. and Basil S. 1979. The Performance of a Conceptual Vertical Attitude Takeoff and Landing Fighter Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada073100
  • Papirno, Ralph. 1977. “Fatigue Fracture Initiation in Notched Graphite-Epoxy Specimens.” Journal of Composite Materials 11 (1): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837701100106
  • Parbery, R. D., and B. L. Karihaloo. 1980. “Minimum-Weight Design of Thin-Walled Cylinders Subject to Flexural and Torsional Stiffness Constraints.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 47 (1): 106–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3153585
  • Park, Hyun Bum. 2015. “Investigation on Damage Tolerance of Thick Laminate Composite Structure.” In Key engineering materials, vol. 665. Trans Tech Publications. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.665.149
  • Park, Hyunbum. 2016. “Investigation on Repairable Damage Tolerance for Structural Design of Aircraft Composite Structure.” Journal of Composite Materials: 0021998316643579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316643579
  • Park, Suncheol, Sungrok Jung, and Myungjin Chung. 2017b. “A UAV Flight Control Algorithm for Improving Flight Safety.” Journal of KIISE 44 (6): 559–65. https://doi.org/10.5626/jok.2017.44.6.559
  • Park, S., Y. E. Kang, Y. Hong, and S. Lee. 2026. “Design of Supercritical Airfoil for Shock Wave Reduction Using Xai-Based Counterfactual Explanations.” Journal of computational fluids engineering 31 (1): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2026.31.1.023
  • Park, Joon-Hoon, and Ryum-Duk Oh. 2017. “Model Reduction Design of Multivariable Aircraft System Using Fast Haar Transform Algorithm.” International Journal of Control and Automation 10 (12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2017.10.12.01
  • “Passive Wing/store Flutter Suppression.” 1982. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71 (4): 1041–1041. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387660
  • Patel, Vijay V., Girish Deodhare, and Shyam Chetty. 2023. “Accelerated Flight Envelope Expansion Using near Real Time Stability Margin Estimation.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 274–86. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v58i4.2006.741
  • Paulson, J. W., Jr., and J. L. Thomas. 1978. Effect of Twist and Camber on the Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Powered Close-Coupled Wing-Canard Configuration. NASA-TM-78722. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780018153
  • Paulson, J. W., Jr., and J. L. Thomas. 1979. Summary of Low-Speed Longitudinal Aerodynamics of Two Powered Close-Coupled Wing-Canard Fighter Configurations. NASA-TP-1535. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800004739
  • Paulson, J. W., Jr., J. L. Thomas, and M. M. Winston. 1979. “Transition Aerodynamics for Close-Coupled Wing-Canard Configuration.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Aerospace Sciences Meeting. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790035660
  • Pearson, Henry A., and William S. Aiken Jr. 1944. Charts for the Determination of Wing Torsional Stiffness Required for Specified Rolling Characteristics or Aileron Reversal Speed. NACA-TR-799. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930091876
  • Peck, W. B., and G. R. Hudson. 1956. Preliminary Wing Weight Determination. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0140230
  • Peled, U., and J. D. Powell. 1978. The Effect of Prefilter Design on Sample Rate Selection in Digital Flight Control Systems. AIAA PAPER 78-1308. Stanford University. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780066300
  • Pellerin, Roy F. 1988. In-Plane Stress Waves for NDE (Nondestructive Evaluation) of Graphite Fiber/Epoxy Composites. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada197718
  • Pelykh, Valentyn, and Volodymyr Andryushchenko. 2024. “Determination of the Features of Integrated Design of Civil Long-Range Aircraft with Transonic Truss-Braced Wing at the Preliminary Design Stage.” Technology audit and production reserves 1 (1(75)): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.298600
  • Pena, Francisco. 2020. Fiber-Optic Strain-Based Deflection and Twist Sensing for a High-Aspect-Ratio Swept Wing. NASA/TM-2020-220465. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200001121
  • Pena, Francisco, Benjamin Martins, and W. Lance Richards. 2018. “Adaptive Load Control of Flexible Aircraft Wings Using Fiber Optic Sensing.” In Optical Society of America. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190033242
  • Pendem, Rajyalaxmi. 2023. “Fly by Wire Advancements in Aviation over Conventional Flight Control Systems.” International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 11 (6): 1771–75. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.52971
  • Pengelley, C. D., and L. E. Wilson. 1954. Flutter Characteristics of a t-Tail. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0061591
  • Perkins, T. M., and T. R. Brice. 1966. An Investigation of the Aeroelastic Stability of Thin Cylindrical Shells at Transonic Mach Numbers. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0632829
  • Perry, Elmer M., and John F. Rievley. 1961. Structural Flight Loads Data from Jet-Tanker Operations. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0259391
  • Perry, B., III. 1976. An Analytical Study of Turbulence Responses, Including Horizontal-Tail Loads, of a Control-Configured Vehicle with Relaxed Static Stability. NASA-TN-D-8142. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760011057
  • Perry, B., III. 1982. Methodology for Determining Elevon Deflections to Trim and Maneuver the DAST Vehicle with Negative Static Margin. NASA-TM-84499. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820020423
  • Persoon, A. J., R. Roos, and P. Schippers. 1980. Transonic and Low Supersonic Wind-Tunnel Tests on a Wing with Inboard Control Surface. Part I. General Description. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada097094
  • Petersen, K. L. 1981. “Flight Experience with a Remotely Augmented Vehicle Flight Test Technique.” In Flight Testing Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820030322
  • Petriconi, Emanuele, Luca Lomazzi, Marco Giglio, and Claudio Sbarufatti. 2026. “Integrating Quantum Finite Element Method and Bayesian Inference for Digital Twin Model Updating.” e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing 31 (8). https://doi.org/10.58286/33896
  • Peyada, N. K., and A. K. Ghosh. 2023. “Longitudinal Aerodynamic Parameter Estimation Using Neural Network and Gauss-Newton Method.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 295–304. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v61i2.2009.524
  • Pham, Van Khiem. 2022. “Optimization of Wing Profile in Transonic Flow.” Journal of Science and Technique 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.56651/lqdtu.jst.v17.n02.312
  • Philippidis, T. P. 1994. “Plane Elasticity Analysis of a Simply Supported Laminate with Anisotropic Plies.” Science and Engineering of Composite Materials 3 (1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm.1994.3.1.39
  • Piao, Minnan, Youan Zhang, Mingwei Sun, Zhihong Yang, Zenghui Wang, and Zengqiang Chen. 2019. “Adaptive Aeroservoelastic Mode Stabilization of Flexible Airbreathing Hypersonic Vehicle.” Journal of Vibration and Control 25 (15): 2124–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546319849775
  • Place, G., H. M. Altmann, L. G. Barbee, Campbell Jr., and G. F. E. R. Neuharth. 1974. Interactive Computer-Aided Design Aircraft Flying Qualities Program. Volume 4. Program Assessment/Correlation Reports. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0785104
  • Plotkin, A. 1978. “Unsteady Transonic Thin-Airfoil Theory for Power-Law Upwash.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 45 (2): 440–41. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3424324
  • Poll, D. I. A. 1986. “Spiral Vortex Flow over a Swept-Back Wing.” Aeronautical Journal 90 (895): 185–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000015670
  • Portapas, Vilius, and Alastair Cooke. 2020. “Simulated Pilot-in-the-Loop Testing of Handling Qualities of the Flexible Wing Aircraft.” Aviation 24 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2020.12175
  • Posingies, Walter M. 1979. Program for the Critical Components of a Fly-by-Tube Backup Flight Control System. Part I.. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada070387
  • Powers, B. G. 1980. Experience with an Adaptive Stick-Gain Algorithm to Reduce Pilot-Induced-Oscillation Tendencies. AIAA PAPER 80-1571. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800061700
  • Prajapati, Arvind Kumar, and Rajendra Prasad. 2019. “A New Model Order Reduction Method for the Design of Compensator by Using Moment Matching Algorithm.” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 42 (3): 472–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331219874595
  • Pritt, Harold L. 1980. Thermal Degradation of Graphite/Epoxy Composite. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada106425
  • “Prototype Digital Flight Control Computer.” 1986. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 58 (5): 19–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb036284
  • Pryor, C. W., and R. M. Barker. 1970. “Finite Element Analysis of Bending-Extensional Coupling in Laminated Composites.” Journal of Composite Materials 4 (4): 549–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837000400410
  • Przekop, Adam, Dawn C. Jegley, Marshall Rouse, and Andrew E. Lovejoy. 2014. “Analysis and Testing of a Metallic Repair Applicable to Pressurized Composite Aircraft Structure.” In SAMPE TECH 2014. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140010013
  • Puthisikamani, K., N. Sreenivasaraja, S. Balasundaram, and S. R. Arun. 2023. “Design and Analysis of Wing Tip Twist on a Forward Swept Wing Using Prandtl-d Wing Concept.” Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies: 287–93. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v74i4.2022.47
  • Putnam, T. W. 1983. X-29 Flight Research Program. AIAA PAPER 83-2687. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840030937
  • Putnam, T. W. 1984a. “The X-29 Flight-Research Program.” AIAA Student Journal 22. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850031744
  • Putnam, T. W. 1984b. “X-29 Flight-Research Program.” In AIAA 2nd Flight Test Conf.. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840008100
  • Putnam, T. W., K. L. Petersen, S. D. Ishmael, and W. J. Sefic. 1986. “X-29 Flight: Acid Test for Design Predictions.” Aerospace America 24. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860046595
  • Qi, Wuchao, Shuai Yuan, and Sumei Tian. 2026. “Thermo-Aeroelastic Flutter Instability and Nonlinear Aeroelastic Responses of Viscoelastic Sandwich Composite Panels.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 39 (3): 04026008. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-6518
  • Qian, Wenmin. 2018. “Robust Flutter Suppression and Wind-Tunnel Tests of a Three-Dimensional Wing.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 31 (6): 04018099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000925
  • Qian, Cheng, Zhang Xinhui, and Cui Xiaodan. 2025. “Energy Configuration Design and Configuration Scheme of Actuator for Large Aircraft Flight Control System.” Journal of Intelligent Aeronautical Systems and Sustainable Flight Technologies 1: 55–59. https://doi.org/10.65904/3083-3450.2025.01.05
  • Qin, Zijie, Kun Liu, and Xi Zhao. 2023. “A Smooth Control Allocation Method for a Distributed Electric Propulsion VTOL Aircraft Test Platform.” IET Control Theory & Applications 17 (7): 925–42. https://doi.org/10.1049/cth2.12427
  • Qiu, Jiabo. 2022. “Equivalent Stiffness Calculation of Composite Hat Stiffened Laminate.” Vibroengineering Procedia 47: 42–48. https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2022.23045
  • Qiu, Lei, Fang Fang, Shenfang Yuan, Christian Boller, and Yuanqiang Ren. 2018. “An Enhanced Dynamic Gaussian Mixture Model–based Damage Monitoring Method of Aircraft Structures under Environmental and Operational Conditions.” Structural Health Monitoring 18 (2): 524–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718759344
  • Qiu, Lei, Shenfang Yuan, and Christian Boller. 2017. “An Adaptive Guided Wave-Gaussian Mixture Model for Damage Monitoring under Time-Varying Conditions: Validation in a Full-Scale Aircraft Fatigue Test.” Structural Health Monitoring 16 (5): 501–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717692571
  • Qu, Xiaoyu, and Tao Li. 2022. “Design of Gust Load Alleviation Control Based on UD-PSO for Civil Aircraft.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2258 (1): 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2258/1/012074
  • Radetskaya, A. A. 2022. “Characteristics Analysis and Drive Type Selection for Aileron Control of a Heavy Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” Politechnical student journal, no. 75. https://doi.org/10.18698/2541-8009-2022-10-833
  • Radford, R. C., R. Smith, and R. Bailey. 1980. Landing Flying Qualities Evaluation Criteria for Augmented Aircraft. NASA-CR-163097. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810005458
  • Ragab, Saad, Muhammad R. Hajj, Mostafa M. Ibrahim, and Mohamed Y. Zakaria. 2018. “A Computational Study of Vortex Shedding from a NACA-0012 Airfoil at High Angles of Attack.” International Journal of Aerodynamics 6 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijad.2018.10010814
  • Rahima, Benzenati, Bensafia Yassine, and Lehouche Hocine. 2026. “Enhanced Pitch Angle of Aircraft System Using Fractional Model Reference Adaptive Control Approach.” ITEGAM- Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications (ITEGAM-JETIA) 12 (59): 320–27. https://doi.org/10.5935/jetia.v12i59.3437
  • Rais-Rohani, Masoud. 1994. “Thin Tailored Composite Wing for Civil Tiltrotor.” In Hampton Univ., 1994 NASA-HU American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Summer Faculty Fellowship Program. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950016897
  • Rais-Rohani, Masound. 1999. Global-Local Analysis and Optimization of a Composite Civil Tilt-Rotor Wing. Mississippi State Univ. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990064496
  • Rais-Rohani, M., R. T. Haftka, B. Grossman, and E. R. Unger. 1992. “Integrated Aerodynamic-Structural-Control Wing Design.” In In: AIAA(USAF)NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 4th, Cleveland, OH, Sept. 21-23, 1992, Technical Papers. Pt. 1 (A93-20301 06-66). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930036310
  • Rajamurugu, Natarajan, Mohit Satyam, V. Manoj, V. Nagendra, and M. Sundararaj. 2024. “Static Aeroelastic Characterization of a Slender Straight Wing.” International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.16.1.04
  • Ramamoorthy, P. A. 1992. Intelligent Signal Processing for Active Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada252232
  • Ramroop, Navin, Amarnath Chinchamee, and Aruna Rajballie. 2025. “Buckling Robustness to Imperfections in Tow-Steered Compared with Quasi-Isotropic Composite Cylinders.” Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2025.12(1).str-54
  • Ranaudo, Richard J., Thomas P. Ratvasky, and Judith FossVanZante. 2000. Flying Qualities Evaluation of a Commuter Aircraft with an Ice Contaminated Tailplane. NASA/TM-2000-210356. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20000120385
  • Raney, David L. 1987. Analysis of Lateral Stability of X-29 Drop Model Using System Identification Methodology. AIAA PAPER 87-2625. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870062350
  • Raney, David L., and James G. Batterson. 1989. Lateral Stability Analysis for X-29A Drop Model Using System Identification Methodology. NASA-TM-4108. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890012431
  • Rao, Nagaraja, and K. E. Hofer Jr. 1973. Fatigue Behavior of Graphite/Glass/Epoxy Composites. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada305383
  • Rao, Raja Venkata Narasinga, and Chandramouli Padmanabhan. 2019. “Chaos Control of Nonlinear Aeroelastic Pitch Plunge Model.” International Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics and Control 1 (4): 387. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijndc.2019.103285
  • Rapoff, Andrew J., Harold D. Dill, Kenneth B. Sanger, and Edward F. Kautz. 1990. “Certification of Damage Tolerant Composite Structure.” In NASA. Langley Research Center, Eighth DOD(NASA)FAA Conference on Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, Part 2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920023336
  • Rath, Tobias, and Walter Fichter. 2020. “Flight Control Design for the Systematic Improvement of Ride Qualities.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.66.022003
  • Ray, R. J., J. W. Hicks, and R. I. Alexander. 1988. Development of a Real-Time Aeroperformance Analysis Technique for the X-29A Advanced Technology Demonstrator. NASA-TM-100432. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880011767
  • Ray, E. J., L. W. McKinney, and J. G. Carmichael. 1972. “Maneuver and Buffet Characteristics of Fighter Aircraft.” In AGARD Fluid Dyn. of Aircraft Stalling. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730006292
  • Ray, E. J., L. W. McKinney, and J. G. Carmichael. 1973. Maneuver and Buffet Characteristics of Fighter Aircraft. NASA-TN-D-7131. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730017272
  • Rea, Francesco, Rosario Pecora, Francesco Amoroso, Maurizio Arena, Maria Chiara Noviello, and Gianluca Amendola. 2018. “Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of a Wind Tunnel Wing Model Equipped with a True Scale Morphing Aileron.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research 7 (4): 440–50. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.6.6.440-450
  • Rea (j B) CO INC Santa Monica CA. 1957. Aeroelasticity in Stability and Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0126837
  • Rediess, Herman A. 1976. Advanced Control Technology and Its Potential for Future Transport Aircraft. NASA-TM-X-3409. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760024047
  • Rediess, H. A., and K. J. Szalai. 1975. “Status and Trends in Active Control Technology.” In NASA/Univ. Conf. on Aeron.. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750020942
  • Reeder, John P. 1958. “Handling Qualities of Helicopters and VTOL Aircraft.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 3 (2): 4–5. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.3.4
  • Rehman, Zia Ur. 2022. “Time-Domain Analytical Method for Aeroelastic Analysis of High Aspect Ratio Wing Using Unsteady Indicial Aerodynamics.” Incas Bulletin 14 (3): 85–99. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2022.14.3.8
  • Ren, Baiyang, and Cliff J. Lissenden. 2016. “Modal Content-Based Damage Indicators for Disbonds in Adhesively Bonded Composite Structures.” Structural Health Monitoring 15 (5): 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716650627
  • Ren, Yuanqiang, Lei Qiu, Shenfang Yuan, and Fang Fang. 2018. “Gaussian Mixture Model–based Path-Synthesis Accumulation Imaging of Guided Wave for Damage Monitoring of Aircraft Composite Structures under Temperature Variation.” Structural Health Monitoring 18 (1): 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717752661
  • “Research and Design of Automatic Flight Control System Test System.” 2022. Foreign Language Science and Technology Journal Database Engineering Technology. https://doi.org/10.47939/et.v3i2.104
  • Rhodes, M. D., and B. P. Selberg. 1982. Dual Wing, Swept Forward Swept Rearward Wing, and Single Wing Design Optimization for High Performance Business Airplanes. Missouri-Rolla, University. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820057396
  • Rich, M. J., G. F. Ridgley, and D. W. Lowry. 1974. “Application of Advanced Composites to Helicopter Airframe Structures.” In American Helicopter Society. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740053860
  • Richwine, David M., and David F. Fisher. 1991. “In-Flight Leading-Edge Vortex Flow-Field Survey Measurements on a F-18 Aircraft at High Angle of Attack.” In AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910069136
  • Richwine, David M., and David F. Fisher. 1992. In-Flight Leading-Edge Extension Vortex Flow-Field Survey Measurements on a F-18 Aircraft at High Angle of Attack. NASA-TM-4398. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920022032
  • Rickard, W. W. 1978. Modeling and Parameter Uncertainties for Aircraft Flight Control System Design. AIAA PAPER 78-1371. McDonnell Douglas Corp. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780062649
  • Ricketts, R. H., and R. V. Doggett Jr. 1980. Wind-Tunnel Experiments on Divergence of Forward-Swept Wings. NASA-TP-1685. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800020786
  • Ricketts, R. H., M. C. Sandford, D. A. Seidel, and J. J. Watson. 1983b. “Transonic Pressure Distributions on a Rectangular Supercritical Wing Oscillating in Pitch.” In Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830048631
  • Ricketts, R. H., J. J. Watson, M. C. Sandford, and D. A. Seidel. 1983a. Geometric and Structural Properties of a Rectangular Supercritical Wing Oscillated in Pitch for Measurement of Unsteady Transonic Pressure Distributions. NASA-TM-85673. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860014096
  • Rigatos, G. 2021. “A Nonlinear Optimal Control Approach for the Vertical Take-off and Landing Aircraft.” Guidance, Navigation and Control 01 (03): 2150012. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737480721500126
  • Rimer, M., R. Chipman, and R. Mercadante. 1983. “Divergence Suppression System for a Forward Swept Wing Configurationwith Wing-Mounted Stores.” In 10th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. AIAA 1983-2125. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-2125
  • Rimer, M., R. Chipman, and B. Muniz. 1984a. Control of Forward Swept Wing Configurations Dominated by Flight-Dynamic/aeroelastic Interactions. AIAA PAPER 84-1866. Grumman Aerospace Corp. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840060637
  • Rising, J. J., W. J. Davis, C. S. Willey, and R. C. Cokeley. 1984. “Demonstration of Relaxed Static Stability on a Commercial Transport.” Lockheed Horizons, no. 16, 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850030442
  • Rizzetta, Donald P. 1977. The Aeroelastic Analysis of a Two-Dimensional Airfoil in Transonic Flow. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada057505
  • Ro, Kapscong, Jewel Barlow, and Gyunghyun Bae. 1992. “Integrated Flight Control Law Synthesis for an Aeroelastic Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft.” In 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA 1992-46. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-46
  • Robbins, John, Richard S. Stansbury, Ramy A. Rahimi, and Robert Moore. 2023. “A Comparative Study of Redundant and Non-Redundant Flight Control System Architectures for Unmanned Aircraft: Key Limitations and Recommendations.” International Journal of Vehicle Design 1 (1): 10060015. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijvd.2023.10060015
  • Roberts, P. A., R. L. Swaim, D. K. Schmidt, and A. J. Hinsdale. 1977. Effects of Control Laws and Relaxed Static Stability on Vertical Ride Quality of Flexible Aircraft. NASA-CR-143843. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770016183
  • Robinson, Jason. 2004. Structural Testing and Analysis of a Joined Wing Technology Demonstrator. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada425641
  • Robinson, M. R., and D. A. Robinson. 1980. “Forward Swept Wing (FSW) Designs: A High Payoff through Technology Integration.” In Aircraft Systems Meeting. AIAA 1980-1884. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1884
  • “Robust Controller Design Based on L1 Adaptive Control Method.” 2016. Rev. Téc. Ing. Univ. Zulia. https://doi.org/10.21311/001.39.6.30
  • Rockwell, Donald O. 1994. Unsteady Structure of Leading-Edge Vortices on a Delta Wing. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada278988
  • Rodemich, E. R., and L. V. Andrew. 1965. Unsteady Aerodynamics for Advanced Configurations. Part 2. a Transonic Box Method for Planar Lifting Surfaces. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0618097
  • Rogalski, Tomasz. 2018. “Unmanned Aircraft Automatic Flight Control Algorithm in Loop Manoeuvre.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 90 (6): 877–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-02-2018-0088
  • Rogalski, Tomasz, Paweł Rzucidło, Stanisław Noga, and Jacek Prusik. 2021. “Unmanned Aircraft Automatic Flight Control Algorithm in an Immelmann Manoeuvre.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 93 (9): 1460–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-11-2020-0269
  • Rogalski, Tomasz, Paweł Rzucidło, and Jacek Prusik. 2020. “Unmanned Aircraft Automatic Flight Control Algorithm in a Spin Maneuver.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 92 (8): 1215–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-05-2019-0099
  • Rogers, Lynn C. 1970. Optimum Selection of Design Variable Increments to Improve Flutter Characteristics. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada367071
  • Rogólski, Robert, and Aleksander Olejnik. 2018. “Structural Model with Controls of a Very Light Airplane for Numerical Flutter Calculations.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 92 (3): 304–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2018-0059
  • Romano, Fulvio, Monica Ciminello, Assunta Sorrentino, and Umberto Mercurio. 2019. “Application of Structural Health Monitoring Techniques to Composite Wing Panels.” Journal of Composite Materials 53 (25): 3515–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998319843333
  • Ronfle-Nadaud, Catherine. 2009. Adaptive Control, Wide Speed Range Flight, and Deconfliction. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada512960
  • Rongrong, Xue, Ye Zhengyin, Ye Kun, and Wang Gang. 2018. “Composite Material Structure Optimization Design and Aeroelastic Analysis on Forward Swept Wing.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 233 (13): 4679–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410018807810
  • Rooney, R. H., J. C. Chung, and E. Y. Shapiro. 1982. Modal Control of Relaxed Static Stability Aircraft. AIAA PAPER 82-1524. Lockheed-California Co. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820055409
  • Roorda, John. 1967. “Some Thoughts on the Southwell Plot.” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 93 (6): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcea3.0000919
  • Roscoe, Stanley N., Janice E. Eisele, and Craig A. Bergman. 1975. Advanced Integrated Aircraft Displays and Augmented Flight Control. Volume 1. Scientific Findings. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada022459
  • Roskam, J., and C. Lan. 1973. A Parametric Study of Planform and Aeroelastic Effects on Aerodynamic Center, Alpha- and q-Stability Derivatives. NASA-CR-2117. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730013169
  • Roskam, J., C. Lan, and S. Mehrotra. 1972. A Parametric Study of Planform and Aeroelastic Effects on Aerodynamic Center, Alpha- and q- Stability Derivatives. Appendix A: A Computer Program for Calculating Alpha- and q- Stability Derivatives and Induced Drag for Thin Elastic Aeroplanes at Subsonic and Supersonic Speeds. NASA-CR-112229. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730013170
  • Ross, J. 1984. “Applicability of a Panel Method, Which Includes Nonlinear Effects, to a Forward-Swept-Wing Aircraft.” In Aircraft Design Systems and Operations Meeting. AIAA 1984-2402. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1984-2402
  • Ross, J. C., and A. D. Matarazzo. 1982. “Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Generic Forward-Swept-Wing Aircraft.” In SAE Technical Paper Series, vol. 1. SAE International. https://doi.org/10.4271/821467
  • Rowley, Clancy. 2008. Unsteady Aerodynamic Models for Flight Control of Agile Micro Air Vehicles. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada476708
  • Roylance, David. 1980. “Stress Wave Damage in Graphite/Epoxy Laminates.” Journal of Composite Materials 14 (2): 111–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838001400203
  • Ruhlin, C., J. Watson, R. Ricketts, and R. Doggett Jr. 1982. “Evaluation of Four Subcritical Response Methods for on-Line Prediction of Flutter Onset in Wind-Tunnel Tests.” In 23rd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. AIAA 1982-644. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1982-644
  • Rumble, S. J. 1987. Experimental Aspects of Using Time-Averaged Holographic Interferometry to Detect Barely Visible Impact Damage in a Graphite/Epoxy Composite Plate,. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada194418
  • Russo, M., M. Healy, and M. Brock. 1986. “X-29A Flight Flutter Data Analysis by Advanced Methods.” In 3rd Flight Testing Conference and Technical Display. AIAA 1986-9737. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1986-9737
  • Rustenburg, John W. 1972. Ride Quality Design Criteria for Aircraft with Active Mode Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada004456
  • Ružička, Pavel, Jan Rýdel, Miroslav Josefik, and Fritz Boden. 2013. “Assessment of IPCT for Wing Deformation Measurements on Small Aircrafts.” In Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34738-2_6
  • Ryder, J. T., and E. K. Walker. 1976. Ascertainment of the Effect of Compressive Loading on the Fatigue Lifetime of Graphite Epoxy Laminates for Structural Applications. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada043365
  • Saderla, S., R. Dhayalan, and A. K. Ghosh. 2016. “Parameter Estimation from near Stall Flight Data Using Conventional and Neural-Based Methods.” Defence Science Journal 67 (1): 03. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.67.9995
  • Sadoff, Melvin, Norman M. McFadden, and Donovan R. Heinle. 1961. A Study of Longitudinal Control Problems at Low and Negative Damping and Stability with Emphasis on Effects of Motion Cues. NASA-TN-D-348. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980227090
  • Saetti, Umberto. 2025a. “Dynamic Inversion Flight Control Laws for Automatic Transition of Tilt-Rotor/Wing Aircraft.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.70.032005
  • Saetti, Umberto. 2025b. “Redundant Control Allocation Strategies for the RACER Compound Rotorcraft Configuration.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 70 (4): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.70.042007
  • Saetti, Umberto, and Jonathan Rogers. 2024. “Explicit Uncertainty Quantification for Probabilistic Assessment of Rotorcraft Handling Qualities.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 69 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.69.042007
  • Şahin, Harun Levent, and Yavuz Yaman. 2018a. “Design and Analysis of a Novel Mechanism for the Morphing of Trailing Edge of an Aircraft Wing.” MATEC Web of Conferences 188: 04001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818804001
  • Sahu, Jubaraj, Karen Heavey, and Surya Dinavahi. 2000. Application of CFD to High Angle of Attack Missile Flow Fields. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada384925
  • Saltzman, Edwin J., John W. Hicks, and Sue Luke. 1994. In-Flight Lift-Drag Characteristics for a Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft and Comparisons with Contemporary Aircraft). NASA-TP-3414. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950012150
  • Samputh, Heershikesh Heerish, Lip Kean Moey, Vin Cent Tai, and Yong Chai Tan. 2024. “Investigation of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Swept c-Wing Configurations at Transonic Speed Using Design of Experiments and Computational Fluid Dynamics.” Aviation 28 (2): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2024.21495
  • Sandhu, R. S., W. E. Wolfe, R. L. Sierakowski, C. C. Chang, and H. R. Chu. 1991. Finite Element Analysis of Free-Edge Delamination in Laminated Composite Specimens. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada251659
  • Saputra, Angga Dwi, and R. Wibawa Purabaya. 2018. “Prediction of Flutter Boundary Using Flutter Margin for the Discrete-Time System.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1005: 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1005/1/012019
  • Savelev, A. S., and E. S. Neretin. 2022. “METHODOLOGY FOR QUORUM CONTROL OF THE REDUNDANT IRS SIGNALS IN THE MAIN MODE OF THE CIVIL AIRCRAFT CONTROL SYSTEM.” Vestnik komp’iuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologii, no. 220: 3–14. https://doi.org/10.14489/vkit.2022.10.pp.003-014
  • Sawyer, J. W. 1976. Flutter and Buckling of General Laminated Plates. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760047048
  • Schmeichel, Harry. 1967. Simplified Switching Functions for Time-Optimal Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0658073
  • Schmidt, David K., and John D. Schierman. 1990. “Extended Implicit Model Following as Applied to Integrated Flight and Propulsion Control.” In AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900060642
  • Schpey, R. A. 1980. Composite Materials for Structural Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada083721
  • Schreadley, Harry W. 1977. The Evaluation of a Digital Hardware Voter/Monitor in an Aircraft Control System. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada043979
  • Schroeder, Jeffery A., William W. Y. Chung, Duc T. Tran, Soren Laforce, and Norman J. Bengford. 2001. “Pilot-Induced Oscillation Prediction with Three Levels of Simulation Motion Displacement.” In Pilot-Induced Oscillation Research: Status at the End of the Century. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010037958
  • Schuster, David M., and John W. Edwards. 2004. “Application of Computational Stability and Control Techniques Including Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelastic Effects.” In COMSAC: Computational Methods for Stability and Control, Part 2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040086524
  • Schuster, Lawrence S., and William A. Lokos. 1988. Current Flight Test Experience Related to Structural Divergence of Forward-Swept Wings. NASA-TM-100445. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880015249
  • Schwanz, Robert C. 1972. Formulations of the Equations of Motion of an Elastic Aircraft for Stability and Control and Flight Control Applications. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada006391
  • Sefic, W. J., and W. Cutler. 1986. X-29A Advanced Technology Demonstrator Program Overview. AIAA PAPER 86-9727. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860047338
  • Sefic, W. J., and C. M. Maxwell. 1986. “X-29A Technology Demonstrator Flight Test Program Overview.” In ISA Aerospace Industries/Test Measurement Symposium. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860016856
  • Sefic, Walter J., and Cleo M. Maxwell. 1987. Flight Research on a Forward-Swept-Wing Airplane. ISSN: 0145-319X. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870000497
  • Segel, Leonard. 1952. Investigation of Discrepancies between Flight-Measured and Calculated F- 80A Derivatives and Responses Including a Study of Aeroelastic Effects. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada076043
  • Seidel, D. A., M. C. Sandford, and C. V. Eckstrom. 1985. “Measured Unsteady Transonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Elastic Supercritical Wing with an Oscillating Control Surface.” In Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850048176
  • Sekhar, Chinta, Pumeric math Suresh, Padma Vijetha Dev, and Gaurav Gupta. 2024. “Active Flutter Suppression for an Aircraft Wing Structure by Utilizing FE Analysis for Al7075+Sic Alloy.” MATEC Web of Conferences 392: 01016. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439201016
  • Selberg, B. P., and D. L. Cronin. 1985. Aerodynamic-Structural Study of Canard Wing, Dual Wing, and Conventional Wing Systems for General Aviation Applications. NASA-CR-172529. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850008520
  • Sellers, William L., III, James F. Meyers, and Timothy E. Hepner. 1988. LDV Surveys over a Fighter Model at Moderate to High Angles of Attack. SAE PAPER 881448. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890040847
  • Sellers, William L., III, James F. Meyers, and Timothy E. Hepner. 2004. LDV Surveys over a Fighter Model at Moderate to High Angles of Attack. SAE-88-1448. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040161542
  • Setiawarman, Bevan Bintang, and Rianto Adhy Sasongko. 2026. “Reinforcement Learning-Based Speed and Altitude Control System for Tilting Rotor UAV in Transition Flight.” Guidance, Navigation and Control: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737480726400078
  • Setoguchi, Nao, and Masahiro Kanazaki. 2020. “Low-Speed and High Angle of Attack Aerodynamic Characteristics of Supersonic Business Jet with Forward Swept Wing.” In AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. AIAA 2020-0534. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0534
  • Shafer, M. F. 1980. Low Order Equivalent Models of Highly Augmented Aircraft Determined from Flight Data Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation. AIAA PAPER 80-1627. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800061745
  • Shafer, M. F., R. E. Smith, J. F. Stewart, and R. E. Bailey. 1983. Flight Test Experience with Pilot-Induced-Oscillation Suppressor Filters. AIAA PAPER 83-2107. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830060718
  • Shafer, M. F., R. E. Smith, J. F. Stewart, and R. E. Bailey. 1984. “Flight Test Experience with Pilot-Induced-Oscillation Suppression Filters.” In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mech. Conf.. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840008145
  • Shafer, Mary F., and Paul Steinmetz. 2001a. Pilot-Induced Oscillation Research: Status at the End of the Century. NASA/CP-2001-210389/VOL3. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010037948
  • Shafer, Mary F., and Paul Steinmetz. 2001b. Pilot-Induced Oscillation Research: The Status at the End of the Century. NASA/CP-2001-210389/VOL1. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010038270
  • Shah, Parthiv N., Eric L. Blades, Michael R. Nucci, Nicolas D. Reveles, Travis L. Turner, and David P. Lockard. 2023. Fully Coupled Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Adaptive Shape Memory Alloy Structural Technologies for Airframe Noise Reduction. ATA Engineering (United States). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220001748
  • Shankar, Vijaya, and Norman Malmuth. 1982. Computational Treatment of Transonic Canard-Wing Interactions. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada121662
  • Shanley, F. R. 1943. “Aircraft Structural Research.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 15 (7): 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb031034
  • Sharif, Muqeeth, Mohammed Abbas, and Mukarram Hussain. 2022. “Aerodynamics of Forward Swept Wing.” Graduate Research in Engineering and Technology: 83–85. https://doi.org/10.47893/gret.2022.1084
  • Sharma, Narayan, Prasant Kumar Swain, and Dipak Kumar Maiti. 2023. “Uncertainty Quantification in Free Vibration and Aeroelastic Response of Variable Angle Tow Laminated Composite Plate.” Journal of Composite Materials 57 (17): 2645–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983231175468
  • Shayak, B., Sarthak Girdhar, and Sunandan Malviya. 2024. “Model-Based Manoeuvre Analysis: A Path to a New Paradigm in Aircraft Flight Dynamics.” Frontiers in Aerospace Engineering 3: 1308872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpace.2024.1308872
  • Shcherban, K. S., A. Y. Sterlin, and K. Y. Famin. 2022. “Features of Fatigue and Damage-Tolerance Tests of Full-Scale Metal-Composite Aircraft Structures.” Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials 88 (4): 66–75. https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-4-66-75
  • Sheikh, Haris Moazam, Sangjoon Lee, Jinge Wang, and Philip S. Marcus. 2023. “Airfoil Optimization Using Design-by-Morphing.” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 10 (4): 1443–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwad059
  • Shen, Guangchen, Junqiang Bai, and Nan Liu. 2015. “Mechanical and Aerodynamic Study of Trailing Edge Variable Camber System for Civil Transport Aircraft.” International Journal of ICT-aided Architecture and Civil Engineering 2 (2): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.21742/ijiace.2015.2.2.02
  • Shen, Yingchun, Shuo Chang, and Qiang Wei. 2022. “Fly-by-Wire Flight Control Comparative Analysis of Resident and Detached Application Sources of Civil Aircraft.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2338 (1): 012092. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2338/1/012092
  • Shen, Yaohua, and Mou Chen. 2023. “Robust Backstepping Control for Maneuver Aircraft Based on Event-Triggered Mechanism and Nonlinear Disturbance Observer.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 95 (7): 1016–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-09-2022-0250
  • Shi, Guimin, and Gerard Bezine. 1988. “A General Boundary Integral Formulation for the Anisotropic Plate Bending Problems.” Journal of Composite Materials 22 (8): 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838802200801
  • Shi, PengFei, ZhiYong Tan, and Jie Chen. 2018. “The Development Requirement and Design Considerations for Advanced Civil Aircraft Flight Control System.” SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica 48 (3): 237–47. https://doi.org/10.1360/n092017-00215
  • Shi, Rongqi, and Weiyu Wan. 2015. “Analysis of Flight Dynamics for Large-Scale Morphing Aircraft.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 87 (1): 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2013-0004
  • Shieh, Leang-San, and Guanrong Chen. 1998. Robust Optimal Digital Control of Uncertain Multi-Rate Sampled-Data Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada344559
  • Shinde, Pranoti, S. S. Ohol, and V. K. Tripathi. 2021. “Production Design Analysis for Airfoil Shape Optimization.” Preprint, . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3808560
  • Shivaji, Mrudhula, Daksha Basavaraju, Dhuleep Ravi, and Bino Prince Raja Dennis. 2025. “Characterization of Aeroelastic Divergence Behaviour of an Additively Manufactured Wing Structure.” In AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 3259. AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0265477
  • Shivam and Shashi Bhushan Verma. 2019. “Study of Vortex Breakdown and Pitch up on a Compound Delta Wing.” Incas Bulletin 11 (2): 171–78. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.2.14
  • Shrivastava, P. C. 1987. “Stability Boundaries for Command Augmentation Systems.” In NASA. Langley Research Center Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research, 1984. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870013189
  • Shrivastava, Sachin, and P. M. Mohite. 2015. “Redesigning of a Canard Control Surface of an Advanced Fighter Aircraft: Effect on Buckling and Aerodynamic Behavior.” Curved and Layered Structures 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1515/cls-2015-0010
  • Shtessel, Yuri B. 2001. Smooth Sliding Mode Controller Design for Robust Missile Autopilot. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada396963
  • Shyprykevich, P. 1979. Characterization of Graphite/epoxy Laminates for Aeroelastic Tailoring. Grumman Aerospace Corp. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800036960
  • Si, Liang, and Horst Baier. 2016. “An in Situ Ensemble Impact Monitoring and Identification Technique for Fiber Composite Structures under Multiple Disturbances.” Structural Health Monitoring 15 (3): 247–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716636334
  • Silton, Sidra I., Frank Fresconi, and Ilmars Celmins. 2014. High Maneuverability Airframe: Investigation of Fin and Canard Sizing for Optimum Maneuverability. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada611082
  • Silva, Murilo Caetano da. n.d. “Prediction of Wing Divergence and Control Reversal Speeds by Means of an Aeroelastic Finite Element.” PhD diss., Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos. https://doi.org/10.11606/003273318
  • Silva, Walter A., and Robert M. Bennett. 1990. “Using Transonic Small Disturbance Theory for Predicting the Aeroelastic Stability of a Flexible Wind-Tunnel Model.” In AIAA 31st Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900010731
  • Simmonds, James G. 1971. “An Improved Estimate for the Error in the Classical, Linear Theory of Plate Bending.” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 29 (3): 439–47. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/99753
  • Sims, Robert, Paul McCrosson, Robert Ryan, and Joe Rivera. 1989. “X-29A Aircraft Structural Loads Flight Testing.” In Annual Society of Flight Test Engineers Symposium. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009909
  • Singer, Josef. 1989. “On the Applicability of the Southwell Plot to Plastic Buckling.” Experimental Mechanics 29 (2): 205–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02321376
  • Singh, Swaraj, and Yagya Dutta Dwivedi. 2022. “Implementation of Transonic Area Rule and Swept Back Delta Wing Design on an Aircraft.” Graduate Research in Engineering and Technology: 20–25. https://doi.org/10.47893/gret.2022.1050
  • Singhvi, Sarvesh, and Rakesh K. Kapania. 1994. “Comparison of Simple and Chebychev Polynomials in Rayleigh-Ritz Analysis.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 120 (10): 2126–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1994)120:10(2126)
  • Sinke, Zadorozhnaya N. M. Chzhan. 2022. “Regulator with Reference Model for u Nmanned Aircraft Control When Boarding on Unmanned Vehicle.” Automation Modern Techologies. https://doi.org/10.36652/0869-4931-2022-76-2-73-77
  • Sitz, Joel R., and Todd H. Vernon. 1990. “Flight Control System Design Factors for Applying Automated Testing Techniques.” In IEEE. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930021575
  • Sizlo, T. R., R. A. Berg, and D. L. Gilles. 1979. Development of a Low Risk Augmentation System for an Energy Efficient Transport Having Relaxed Static Stability. NASA-CR-159166. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820024501
  • Sliwa, S. M. 1980. Economic Evaluation of Flying-Qualities Design Criteria for a Transport Configured with Relaxed Static Stability. NASA-TP-1760. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810005457
  • Smetana, F. O. 1973. Transonic Viscous Interactions. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0763295
  • Smith, Norval P. 1968. Time Optimal Control for a Class of Common Random Disturbances. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0667521
  • Smith, Cecil L. 1978. Studies in Optimal Control, Estimation and Linear Systems Theory. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada059716
  • Smith, J. W. 1979. Analysis of a Lateral Pilot-Induced Oscillation Experienced on the First Flight of the YF-16 Aircraft. NASA-TM-72867. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790023049
  • Smith, P. R. 1991. “Aircraft Flight Control System Design Concepts.” Measurement and Control 24 (3): 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/002029409102400303
  • Smith, Edward. 2025. “Soaring to New Heights: Investigating the Aeroelastic Stability of Composite Aircraft Wings.” Scientia. https://doi.org/10.33548/scientia1180
  • Smith, J. W., and D. T. Berry. 1975. Analysis of Longitudinal Pilot-Induced Oscillation Tendencies of YF-12 Aircraft. NASA-TN-D-7900. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750008488
  • Smith, Ralph H., and Norman D. Geddes. 1979. Handling Quality Requirements for Advanced Aircraft Design: Longitudinal Mode. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada077858
  • Smith, G. A., J. M. Hammer, and R. E. Rose. 1971. Conceptual Study to Apply Advanced Flight Control Technology to the Coin or Trim Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0730571
  • Smith, M. J., N. Komerath, R. Ames, O. Wong, and J. Pearson. 2001. Performance Analysis of a Wing with Multiple Winglets. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada454384
  • Smith, R. E., J. V. Lebacqz, and J. M. Schuler. 1973. Flight Investigation of Various Longitudinal Short-Term Dynamics for STOL Landing Approach Using the X-22A Variable Stability Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0754840
  • Smith, Rogers E., and Kurt C. Schroeder. 1986. Flight Testing the X-29. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870060567
  • Sobieczky, H. 1984. “Supercritical Airfoil and Wing Design.” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 16 (1): 337–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.16.1.337
  • Son, M. S., J. H. Sa, S. H. Park, and Y. H. Byun. 2015b. “Numerical Analysis of Pressure Perturbation of Delta Wing Vortex Flow at a High Angle of Attack.” Journal of computational fluids engineering 20 (2): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2015.20.2.073
  • Soneda, Kensuke, Natsuki Tsushima, Tomohiro Yokozeki, and Taro Imamura. 2022. “Aeroservoelastic Characteristics of a Corrugated Morphing Control Surface.” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 23 (4): 723–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-022-00474-3
  • Song, O., and L. Librescu. 1991. “Free Vibration and Aeroelastic Divergence of Aircraft Wings Modelledas Composite Thin-Walled Beams.” In 32nd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA 1991-1187. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1991-1187
  • Southwell, R. V., M. J. Gunn, A. J. Valsangkar, and A. M. Britto. 1981. “Application of the Southwell Plot Method to the Inspection and Testing of Buried Flexible Pipes.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 71 (1): 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1981.2140
  • Spacht, G. 1980. “The Forward Swept Wing: A Unique Design Challenge.” In Aircraft Systems Meeting. AIAA 1980-1885. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1885
  • Spagnol, Adrien, Rodolphe Le Riche, and Sébastien Da Veiga. 2019. “Global Sensitivity Analysis for Optimization with Variable Selection.” SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification 7 (2): 417–43. https://doi.org/10.1137/18m1167978
  • Spencer, H. H., and A. C. Walker. 1975. “Critique of Southwell Plots with Proposals for Alternative Methods: Paper Examines Those Situations in Which the Southwell Plot Works Poorly and Proposes Alternative Techniques for Finding Pc.” Experimental Mechanics 15 (8): 303–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02318661
  • Speyer, Jason. 2003. Estimation, Control, and Redundancy Management for Uncertain Networks of Cooperating Agents. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada416352
  • Spillman, Mark, and D. B. Ridgely. 1995. Flight Control Applications of 1 Sub 1 Optimization,. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada320244
  • “A Spreadsheet Tool for the AERODAS Model for Calculating Airfoil Pre-Stall and Post-Stall Lift and Drag Characteristics.” 2018. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, no. v8i4. https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v8i4.8480.g7550
  • Srinathkumar, S. 2015. “Eigenstructure Control: A Rotorcraft Handling Qualities Engineering Tool.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 60 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.60.022010
  • Srivastava, Ambuj. 2019. “Determination of Parameters during Quasi-Steady Stall Maneuver Using Genetic Algorithm.” International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1370
  • Stalford, Harold L. 1979. Application of the Estimation-Before-Modeling (EBM) System Identification Method to the High Angle of Attack/Sideslip Flight of the T-2C Jet Trainer Aircraft. Volume 1. Executive Summary. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada080025
  • Stanbrook, A. 1954. “Lift-Curve Slope at Subsonic and Supersonic Speeds: Graphical Presentation of Theoretical Results for Straight-Tapered Wings.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 26 (8): 244–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb032455
  • Stanford, Bret K., and Christine V. Jutte. 2014. “Trim and Structural Optimization of Subsonic Transport Wings Using Nonconventional Aeroelastic Tailoring.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150000538
  • Stanford, Bret K., Carol D. Wieseman, and Christine V. Jutte. 2015. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of Transport Wings Including Transonic Flutter Constraints.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150006025
  • Stanton, E. L., and L. M. Crain. 1980. An Analysis of Interlaminar Stress Gradients and Impact Damage in Graphite-Epoxy Laminates. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada088317
  • Stauffer, W. A., and A. M. James. 1978. “Development of Advanced Composite Structures.” In NASA. Langley Res. Center CTOL Transport Technol., 1978. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780019119
  • Steinberg, Marc L., and Anthony B. Page. 1998. Nonlinear Adaptive Flight Control with a Backstepping Design Approach. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada350986
  • Steinmetz, G. G., R. V. Parrish, and R. L. Bowles. 1972. Longitudinal Stability and Control Derivatives of a Jet Fighter Airplane Extracted from Flight Test Data by Utilizing Maximum Likelihood Estimation. NASA-TN-D-6532. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720010363
  • Sternberg, C. A., Ricardo Traven, and James Lackey. 1994. Navy and the HARV: High Angle of Attack Tactical Utility Issues. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada284128
  • Stewart, J. F., and C. A. Bauer. 1983. A Project Management System for the X-29A Flight Test Program. AIAA PAPER 83-2712. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840033063
  • Stirling, Robert. 1983. “Simulation of a Digital Aircraft Flight Control System.” SIMULATION 40 (5): 171–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/003754978304000504
  • Stolarik, Brian. 2007. Intelligent Flight Control Simulation Research Program. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada470308
  • Stoll, F., and D. G. Koenig. 1983. Large-Scale Wind-Tunnel Investigation of a Close-Coupled Canard-Delta-Wing Fighter Model through High Angles of Attack. AIAA PAPER 83-2554. NASA Ames Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830067155
  • Stottier, Richard H. 1995. Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Flight Test Planning. Phase 1. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada293962
  • Streit, T., S. Wedler, and M. Kruse. 2015. “DLR Natural and Hybrid Transonic Laminar Wing Design Incorporating New Methodologies.” Aeronautical Journal 119 (1221): 1303–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000011283
  • Striz, Alfred G. 1991. Influence of Structural and Aerodynamic Modeling on Flutter Analysis and Structural Optimization. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada248487
  • Structural Aspects of Flexible Aircraft Control. 2000. RTO-MP-36. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20000053157
  • “Structural Fundamentals.” 1955. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 27 (12): 391–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb032631
  • Study of Advanced Composite Structural Design Concepts for an Arrow Wing Supersonic Cruise Configuration, Task 3. 1978. NASA-CR-145192. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780012169
  • A Study of the Effects of Aeroelastic Divergence on the Wing Structure of an Oblique-Wing Supersonic Transport Configuration. 1973. NASA-CR-112262. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730009309
  • Su, Jinlong, Y. L. Mo, and Swee Leong Sing. 2025. “Generative Artificial Intelligence in Lattice Structure Design for Additive Manufacturing: A Critical Review.” Engineering Science in Additive Manufacturing 1 (1): 025110006. https://doi.org/10.36922/esam025110006
  • Sugimoto, Masakatsu, and Koichi Saito. 1968. “A Study on Plastic Bending of an Anisotropic Plate.” Bulletin of JSME 11 (43): 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.11.34
  • Sugimoto, Masakatsu, and Koichi Saito. 1969. “A Study on Plastic Bending of an Anisotropic Plate: 2nd Report, Analyses When the Plate Material Is Rigid Plastic or Rigid-Perfectly Plastic.” Bulletin of JSME 12 (54): 1342–48. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.12.1342
  • Sugino, Satoshi, Akinori Harada, and Koichi Oka. 2019. “Flight Control System Design of Unmanned Fixed Wing Aircraft by CG Position Shifting.” Proceedings of the Symposium on the Motion and Vibration Control 2019.16 (0): C112. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmemovic.2019.16.c112
  • Sugumaran, V. 2024. “Enhanced Performance of Morphing Wing through Composite Fabrication and Structural Health Monitoring.” IARJSET 11 (5). https://doi.org/10.17148/iarjset.2024.11553
  • Suh, Peter M., Howard J. Conyers, and Dimitri N. Mavris. 2014. “Rapid State Space Modeling Tool for Rectangular Wing Aeroservoelastic Studies.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150000848
  • Suh, Peter M., Howard Jason Conyers, and Dimitri N. Mavris. 2015. Rapid State Space Modeling Tool for Rectangular Wing Aeroservoelastic Studies. NASA/TM-2015-218875. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150020901
  • Suikat, Reiner, Kent Donaldson, and David R. Downing. 1987. An Analysis of a Candidate Control Algorithm for a Ride Quality Augmentation System. AIAA PAPER 87-2936. Kansas Univ. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880027050
  • Sulaeman, E., N. A. Abdullah, and S. M. Kashif. 2017. “Aeroelastic Passive Control Optimization of Supersonic Composite Wing with External Stores.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 184: 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/184/1/012010
  • Sultan, Mahabub. 2026. “Advanced Flight Control Systems: Integration of AI and Adaptive Control.” Journal of Emerging Innovations in Engineering 2 (02): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.65664/jeie.v2i02.20
  • Sun, Zexu. 2024. “Wing Optimization for Static Aeroelastic Effect.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2882 (1): 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2882/1/012087
  • Sun, Rong, Yuntao Han, and Yingying Wang. 2022. “Design of Generalized Fault Diagnosis Observer and Active Adaptive Fault Tolerant Controller for Aircraft Control System.” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 19 (6): 5591–5609. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022262
  • Sun, Zhengzhong, Xin Miao, and Chetan Jagadeesh. 2020b. “Experimental Investigation of the Transonic Shock-Wave/boundary-Layer Interaction over a Shock-Generation Bump.” Physics of Fluids 32 (10): 106102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0018763
  • Sun, C. T., and K. J. Yoon. 1988. Mechanical Properties of Graphite/Epoxy Composites at Various Temperatures. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada199311
  • Sushchenko, Olha, and Yurii Bezkorovainyi. 2023. “An Approach to Robust Control of Aircraft Motion.” Electronics and Control Systems 3 (77): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.77.18006
  • Synaszko, Piotr, Michał Sałaciński, and Łukasz Kornas. 2015. “The Effect of Environmental Flight Conditions on Damage Propagation in Composite Sandwich Structure.” Fatigue of Aircraft Structures 2015 (7): 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/fas-2015-0004
  • Szalai, K. J. 1975. “Flight Test Experience with the F-8 Digital Fly-by-Wire System.” In Description and Flight Test Results of the NASA F-8 Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750010179
  • Szalai, K. J. 1976. “Flight Test Experience with the F-8 Digital Fly-by-Wire System.” In Advanced Control Technol. and its Potential for Future Transport Aircraft. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760024056
  • Szalai, K. J., P. G. Felleman, J. Gera, and R. D. Glover. 1976. Design and Test Experience with a Triply Redundant Digital Fly-by-Wire Control System. AIAA PAPER 76-1911. NASA Flight Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760058525
  • Szalai, K. J., C. R. Jarvis, G. E. Krier, V. A. Megna, L. D. Brock, and R. N. Odonnell. 1978. Digital Fly-By-Wire Flight Control Validation Experience. NASA-TM-72860. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790005938
  • Szklarski, Adrian, and Robert Głębocki. 2025. “Aerodynamic control analysis in a canard configuration for a surface-to-surface missile.” Archive of Mechanical Engineering: 583–606. https://doi.org/10.24425/ame.2025.155873
  • Tagai, Rie, Kazuyuki Nakakita, Mitsuru Kurita, and Tsutomu Nakajima. 2016. “Wing Deformation Measurement as Bases for in-Flight Aerodynamics.” In AIAA Flight Testing Conference. AIAA 2016-3355. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3355
  • Tahani, M., M. Masdari, and M. Kazemi. 2017. “Aerodynamic Performance Improvement of a Canard Control Missile.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 89 (6): 871–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2016-0019
  • Tahraoui, R. 1994. “Maximal Torsional Rigidity: Some Qualitative Remarks.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics 124 (5): 971–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0308210500022447
  • Tai, Shang, Lixin Wang, Yanling Wang, Chen Bu, Ting Yue, and Hailiang Liu. 2023b. “Research on Dynamic Characteristics Analysis and Control Law Design Method of Model Aircraft in Wind Tunnel–Based Virtual Flight Testing.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 36 (3): 04023015. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-4565
  • Taimoor, Muhammad, and Li Aijun. 2019. “Neural-Sliding Mode Approach-Based Adaptive Estimation, Isolation and Tolerance of Aircraft Sensor Fault.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 92 (2): 237–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-05-2019-0106
  • Takahashi, Timothy T., Stefan Boccieri, Joseph Elvig, et al. 2019. “Troubling Problems Configuring a Forward Swept Wing Transonic Aircraft.” In AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. AIAA 2019-0813. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0813
  • Takahashi, Hiroki, Tomohiro Yokozeki, and Yoshiyasu Hirano. 2016. “Development of Variable Camber Wing with Morphing Leading and Trailing Sections Using Corrugated Structures.” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 27 (20): 2827–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x16642298
  • Tamboli, Ramchandra B. 1956. “An Energy Approach to Climb Performance Estimation of a Turbo-Jet Transport Aircraft.” Aeronautical Quarterly 7 (4): 315–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001925900010313
  • Tan, Seng C. 1988. “Finite-Width Correction Factors for Anisotropic Plate Containing a Central Opening.” Journal of Composite Materials 22 (11): 1080–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838802201105
  • Tan, Junchen, Zhijin Wang, and Ismet Gursul. 2021. “Self-Excited Flag Vibrations Produce Post-Stall Flow Control.” Physical Review Fluids 6 (10): L102701. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevfluids.6.l102701
  • Tang, P. Y. 1989. Development of a Progressive Failure Model for Strength of Laminated Composite Structure. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada216966
  • Tang, Difan, Lei Chen, Zhao F. Tian, and Eric Hu. 2018. “Adaptive Nonlinear Optimal Control for Active Suppression of Airfoil Flutter via a Novel Neural-Network-Based Controller.” Journal of Vibration and Control 24 (22): 5261–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317750504
  • Tang, Difan, Lei Chen, Zhao F. Tian, and Eric Hu. 2020b. “A Neural Network Approach for Improving Airfoil Active Flutter Suppression under Control-Input Constraints.” Journal of Vibration and Control 27 (3–4): 451–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546320929153
  • Tantaroudas, Nikolaos Dimitrios, and Ilias Karachalios. 2026. “H∞ Robust Control for Gust Load Alleviation of Geometrically Nonlinear Flexible Aircraft.” Applied and Computational Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.24132/acm.2026.1114
  • Tarnowski, Andrzej. 2017. “Morphing Wing with Skin Discontinuity – Kinematic Concept.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 89 (4): 535–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-11-2016-0208
  • Taylor, A. S. 1959. “The Present Status of Aircraft Stability Problems in the Aeroelastic Domain.” Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 63 (580): 227–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000092502
  • Taylor, J. M., R. Butler, and C. Harrison. 1999. “Optimisation of Composite Wind-Tunnel Wing Models for Frequency, Flutter and Divergence.” Aeronautical Journal 103 (1020): 105–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000027809
  • Teel, Andrew R. 1999a. Robust Nonlinear Control of Tailless Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada367415
  • Teel, Andrew R. 1999b. Robust Nonlinear Control of Tailless Fighter Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada367012
  • Teixeira, P. C., and C. E. S. Cesnik. 2020. “Propeller Influence on the Aeroelastic Stability of High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft.” Aeronautical Journal 124 (1275): 703–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2019.165
  • Telionis, Demetri. 1995. Post Stall Control of Swept Wings,. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada299820
  • Telionis, Demetri. 2001. Post Stall Flow Control over Swept Wings. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada398139
  • Terekhov, Roman I. 2022. “Estimation of Fly-by-Wire Emergency Servo-Control of Regional Aircraft with Account for Nonlinear Specifics of Control Surfaces Dynamics.” Vestnik Moskovskogo aviatsionnogo instituta 29 (1): 211–25. https://doi.org/10.34759/vst-2022-1-211-225
  • Theerthamalai, P., R. Mukesh, M. Praveenkumar, et al. 2025. “Advanced Aerodynamic Prediction Software for Versatile Canard-Controlled Missile Configurations.” Physics of Fluids 37 (2): 023626. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0256726
  • Theisen, Jerome G., Roy M. Scruggs, and Charles J. Dixon. 1973. Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of Vortex Lift Control by Spanwise Blowing. Volume 2. Three-Dimensional Theory for Vortex-Lift Augmentation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0771304
  • Theodore, Colin R., Carlos A. Malpica, Chris L. Blanken, et al. 2020. “Effect of Control System Augmentation on Handling Qualities and Task Performance in Good and Degraded Visual Environments.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society 65 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.65.042007
  • Thinesh, C., and M. Y. Harmin. 2018. “Nonlinear Reduced Order Model of High Aspect Ratio Rectangular Wing Plate.” International Journal of Engineering and Technology 7 (4.13): 195–201. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.21355
  • Thompson, D. H. 1992. Visualisation in Water of Vortex Flow over Sharp-Edged Canard Configurations. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada251673
  • Thwapiah, Ghalib Y., and L. Flavio Campanile. 2010. “Nonlinear Aeroelastic Study of Bending Divergence.” In ASME 2010 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Volume 1. ASMEDC. https://doi.org/10.1115/smasis2010-3678
  • Tian, Zhongda. 2016. “The Time-Delay Compensation Method for Networked Control System Based on Improved Fast Implicit GPC.” International Journal of Control and Automation 9 (1): 231–40. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2016.9.1.21
  • Tian, Zhongda. 2021. “Networked Control System Time-Delay Compensation Based on PI-Based Dynamic Matrix Control.” at - Automatisierungstechnik 69 (1): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2020-0020
  • Tian, Zhongda, and Fei Tang. 2025. “Delay Compensation Strategy of Networked Control System Based on Neural Network Predictive Control.” Journal of Control Engineering and Applied Informatics 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.61416/ceai.v27i1.9287
  • Tian, Wei, Zhichun Yang, Yingsong Gu, and Yan Ouyang. 2016. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Composite Forward-Swept Wing Using a Novel Hybrid Pattern Search Method.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 29 (6): 04016056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000652
  • Tijdeman, H., J. W. G. van Nunen, A. N. Draan, A. J. Persoon, and R. Poestkoke. 1979a. Transonic Wind Tunnel Tests on an Oscillating Wing with External Store. Part IV. the Wing with Underwing: Store. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada077370
  • Tijdeman, H., J. W. G. van Nunen, A. N. Kraan, A. J. Persoon, and R. Poestkoke. 1979b. Transonic Wind Tunnel Tests on an Oscillating Wing with External Stores. Part II. the Clean Wing. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada071420
  • Ting, Eric, Tung Dao, and Nhan Nguyen. 2015. “Aerodynamic Load Analysis of a Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap System on a Flexible Wing Aircraft.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190025220
  • Ting, Eric, Sonia Lebofsky, Nhan Nguyen, and Khanh Trinh. 2014b. “Static Aeroelastic Scaling and Analysis of a Sub-Scale Flexible Wing Wind Tunnel Model.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150000694
  • Ting, Eric, Nhan Nguyen, and Khanh Trinh. 2014a. “Static Aeroelastic and Longitudinal Trim Model of Flexible Wing Aircraft Using Finite-Element Vortex-Lattice Coupled Solution.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140008648
  • Tingting, Yang, Li Aijun, Muhammad Taimoor, and Rooh ul Amin. 2018. “High AOA Short Landing Robust Control for an Aircraft.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 91 (1): 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-05-2017-0134
  • Toledano, A., and H. Murakami. 1987. “A Composite Plate Theory for Arbitrary Laminate Configurations.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 54 (1): 181–89. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3172955
  • Trabocco, R. E. 1980. Natural Exposure of Selected Graphite/Epoxy Composite Material Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada326379
  • Tran, Thanh T., and Vi H. Nguyen. 2022. “Nonlinear Control of Aircraft Flight Dynamics Using Integrator-Backstepping Design Method.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 35 (2): 04022001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001393
  • Traven, Ricardo, and Susan E. Whitley. 1995. Developing Flight Test Techniques to Ensure Proper Rigging of Highly Augmented Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada300965
  • Tribuno, R. F., J. A. Klein, D. R. Stover, and K. G. Martin. 1976. Compass Cope Flight Control System Redundancy Study. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada029021
  • Trindade Nascimento, Felipe, and José Paulo V. S. Cunha. 2019. “Positive Filter Synthesis for Sliding-Mode Control.” IET Control Theory & Applications 13 (7): 1006–14. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5293
  • Triplett, W. 1980a. “Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Forward Swept Wing and Comparisons with Three Equivalent Aft Swept Wings.” In 21st Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA 1980-794. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-794
  • Trippensee, Gary. 1991. “Update of the X-29 High-Angle-of-Attack Program.” In International Pacific Air and Space Technology Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920062783
  • Trippensee, Gary A., and David P. Lux. 1987. X-29A Forward-Swept-Wing Flight Research Program Status. NASA-TM-100413. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880008260
  • Trippensee, Gary A., and David P. Lux. 1988. “X-29A Forward-Swept-Wing Flight Research Program Status.” In SAE. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890023269
  • Tsatsas, Ilias, Alessandro Pontillo, and Mudassir Lone. 2022. “Aeroelastic Damping Estimation for a Flexible High-Aspect-Ratio Wing.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 35 (2): 04021135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001390
  • Tsubakino, Daisuke, and Shunsuke Saito. 2020. “Nonlinear Control of a Pusher-Configured Small Tail-Sitter UAV with Thrust Vectoring.” Proceedings of Conference of Tokai Branch 2020.69 (0): 412. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmetokai.2020.69.412
  • Tsushima, Natsuki, Hitoshi Arizono, Tomohiro Yokozeki, and Kanjuro Makihara. 2018. “Nonlinear Aeroelasticity of Morphing Wing with Piezoelectric Actuator.” Proceedings of the Transportation and Logistics Conference 2018.27 (0): 1005. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmetld.2018.27.1005
  • Tsushima, Natsuki, Hitoshi Arizono, Tomohiro Yokozeki, and Kanjuro Makihara. 2019a. “Geometrically Nonlinear Electro-Aeroelastic Framework for Morphing Wing with Piezoelectric Actuators.” Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese) 85 (878): 18-00506-18-00506. https://doi.org/10.1299/transjsme.18-00506
  • Tu, Eugene L. 1991. Navier-Stokes Simulation of a Close-Coupled Canard-Wing-Body Configuration. AIAA PAPER 91-0070. NASA Ames Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910036733
  • Tu, Eugene L. 1992a. “Effect of Canard Deflection on Close-Coupled Canard-Wing-Body Aerodynamics.” In AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920062855
  • Tu, Eugene L. 1992b. “Effect of Canard Position on the Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Close-Coupled Canard-Wing-Body Configuration.” In AIAA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930029307
  • Tu, Eugene L., and William R. VanDalsem. 1996. Navier-Stokes Simulation of the Canard-Wing-Body Longitudinal Dynamic Stability Characteristics. NASA Ames Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20020041911
  • Turner, M. J., and J. M. Hoy. 1976. Titanium and Advanced Composite Structures for a Supersonic Cruise Arrow Wing Configuration. Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770011082
  • Ulry, D. N., R. W. Gehring, and K. I. Clayton. 1976. Evaluation of Composite Wing for XFV-12A Airplane. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada041208
  • Unal, Gulay. 2021a. “Fuzzy Robust Fault Estimation Scheme for Fault Tolerant Flight Control Systems Based on Unknown Input Observer.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 93 (10): 1624–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-12-2020-0302
  • Unal, Gulay. 2021b. “Integrated Design of Fault-Tolerant Control for Flight Control Systems Using Observer and Fuzzy Logic.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 93 (4): 723–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-12-2020-0293
  • Underwood, Pamela J., Lewis R. Owens, Richard A. Wahls, and Susan Williams. 2003. “X-29 High Alpha Test in the National Transonic Facility.” In American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20030007882
  • Ursu, Ioan, Dragos Daniel Ion Guta, Daniela Enciu, George Tecuceanu, and Aurelian Andrei Radu. 2018. “Flight Envelope Expansion Based on Active Mitigation of Flutter via a V-Stack Piezoelectric Actuator.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1106: 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1106/1/012033
  • Uzun, Metin. 2024. “Flight Control System Design of UAV with Wing Incidence Angle Simultaneously and Stochastically Varied.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 96 (5): 715–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-11-2023-0287
  • Uzun, M., H. H. Bilgic, E. H. Çopur, and S. Çoban. 2023. “The Aerodynamic Force Estimation of a Swept-Wing UAV Using ANFIS Based on Metaheuristic Algorithms.” Aeronautical Journal 128 (1322): 739–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2023.73
  • Uzun, Metin, and Tugrul Oktay. 2023. “Simultaneous UAV Having Actively Sweep Angle Morphing Wing and Flight Control System Design.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 95 (7): 1062–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-09-2022-0259
  • Valasek, John, and David Downing. 1995. “A Closed-Loop Forebody Vortex Flow Controller for a Generic X-29A Aircraft.” In Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. AIAA 1995-3248. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-3248
  • Valsangkar, A. J., A. M. Britto, M. J. Gunn, T. L. L. Orr, and SOUTHWELL. 1982. “Discussion. Application of the Southwell Plot Method to the Inspection and Testing of Buried Flexible Pipes.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 73 (1): 217–21. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1982.1992
  • Van Den Berg, B., A. Elsenaar, J. P. F. Lindhout, and P. Wesseling. 1975. “Measurements in an Incompressible Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer, under Infinite Swept-Wing Conditions, and Comparison with Theory.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 70 (1): 127–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112075001930
  • Van Dommelen, L. 1995. Thrust-Induced Effects on a Pitching-Up Delta Wing Flow Field: Control of Stalled Wings. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada329654
  • Varun, L. V. S. S. Lohitasya, and Yagya Dutta Dwivedi. 2022. “Three-Dimensional Flow Analysis over Canard Configuration in Turbulence Model.” Graduate Research in Engineering and Technology: 112–17. https://doi.org/10.47893/gret.2022.1061
  • Veerman, H. P. J., H. Kannemans, and H. W. Jentink. 2013. “Highly Accurate Aircraft in-Flight Wing Deformation Measurements Based on Image Correlation.” In Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34738-2_3
  • Veley, Duane E., Narendra S. Khot, Jeffrey V. Zweber, and Alicia R. Hartong. 2008. Optimum Design of a Flexible Wing Structure to Enhance Roll Maneuver in Supersonic Flow. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada478915
  • Velkova, Cvetelina. 2017. “Numerical 3D Transonic Flow Simulation over a Wing.” Review of the Air Force Academy 15 (3): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.19062/1842-9238.2017.15.3.1
  • Vepa, R., and J. R. Kwon. 2021. “Synthesis of an Active Flutter Suppression System in the Transonic Domain Using a Computational Model.” Aeronautical Journal 125 (1293): 2002–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.38
  • Verma, Sumit, Miguel Cid Montoya, and Ashutosh Mishra. 2024. “Aero-Structural Design of Bridge Decks under Non-Synoptic Winds Using an Aeroelastic Surrogate Comprising Shape, Reduced Velocity, and Mean Angle of Attack.” Preprint, . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5039067
  • Vermiglio, Rossana. 2017. “Polynomial Chaos Expansions for the Stability Analysis of Uncertain Delay Differential Equations.” SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification 5 (1): 278–303. https://doi.org/10.1137/15m1029618
  • Viken, Sally A., Craig A. Hunter, S. Naomi McMillin, et al. 2022. Comparison of Computational Predictions of the Mach 0.80 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration with Experimental Data. NASA/TM-20205007879. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205007879
  • Vile, Cleo, Halim Alwi, and Christopher Edwards. 2020. “Robust Fault Tolerant Control Allocation for a Modern over-Actuated Commercial Aircraft.” IET Control Theory & Applications 15 (2): 307–22. https://doi.org/10.1049/cth2.12042
  • Vinje, Edward W., and David P. Miller. 1973. Flight Simulator Experiments and Analyses in Support of Further Development of MIL-F-83300 V/STOL Flying Qualities Specification. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0769868
  • Vitushkin, V. V. 2025. “Methods for Selecting the Best Automated Flight Control System for Civil Aviation Aircraft and Optimizing Its Operation with Respect to Available Resources.” Automation Modern Techologies. https://doi.org/10.36652/0869-4931-2025-79-11-509-513
  • Vlahostergios, Zinon, Dimitrios Komnos, and Kyros Yakinthos. 2018. “Modelling of Vortex Breakdown and Calculation of Large-Scale Kinetic Energy on a Slender Delta Wing Using URANS and Reynolds-Stress Modelling.” Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, An International Journal 18 (6): 347. https://doi.org/10.1504/pcfd.2018.096620
  • Voracek, David F. 1990. “Monitoring Techniques for the X-29A Aircraft’s High-Speed Rotating Power Takeoff Shaft.” In International Machinery Monitoring and Diagnostic Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910009768
  • Voracek, David F., and Robert Clarke. 1991. “Buffet Induced Structural/flight-Control System Interaction of the X-29A Aircraft.” In AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910047389
  • Vukelich, Steven R., Stan L. Stoy, Keith A. Burns, Joseph A. Castillo, and Marvin E. Moore. 1988. Missile DATCOM. Volume 1. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada211086
  • Wada, Daichi, Masato Tamayama, and Hideaki Murayama. 2020. “Smart Wing Load Alleviation through Optical Fiber Sensing, Load Identification, and Deep Reinforcement Learning.” Engineering Research Express 2 (4): 045004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/abbb59
  • Wagg, David. J. 2022. “Normal form transformations for structural dynamics: An introduction for linear and nonlinear systems.” Journal of Structural Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.25518/2684-6500.84
  • Waggoner, E. G., and B. L. Bates. 1989. “Computational Support of the X-29A Advanced Technology Demonstrator Flight Experiment.” In Transonic Symposium: Theory, Application and Experiment, Volume 2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910014824
  • Waggoner, E. G., L. A. Jennett, and B. L. Bates. 1986. X-29 Flight Test Program Including Wind Tunnel and Computational Support. SAE PAPER 861642. NASA Langley Research Center. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870045310
  • Walchli, Lawrence A. 1994. “Flight Evaluation of Pneumatic Forebody Vortex Control in Post-Stall Flight.” In NASA. Dryden Flight Research Center, Fourth High Alpha Conference, Volume 3. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950007845
  • Walchli, Lawrence, Robert Guyton, Frank Luria, and Williamj. Gillard. 1992. “High Angle-of-Attack Control Enhancement on a Forward Swept Wing Aircraft.” In Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. AIAA 1992-4427. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-4427
  • Walker, S. A. 1976. “Design of a Control Configured Tanker Aircraft.” In NASA. Dryden Flight Res. Center Advanced Control Technol. and its Potential for Future Transport Aircraft 3-35 (SEE N76-31135 22-01). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760024070
  • Walker, A. C., and D. G. Hall. 1968. “An Analysis of the Large Deflections of Beams Using the Rayleigh-Ritz Finite Element Method.” Aeronautical Quarterly 19 (4): 357–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001925900004741
  • Walker, Robert W., and John Y. Kaufman. 1977. A-37B Fatigue Sensor Evaluation Program: Full Scale Test and Field Aircraft Instrumentation,. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada042114
  • Walker, T. H., P. J. Minguet, B. W. Flynn, D. J. Carbery, G. D. Swanson, and L. B. Ilcewicz. 1997. Advanced Technology Composite Fuselage-Structural Performance. NASA-CR-4732. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970016009
  • Walsh, Kevin R. 1993. “Summary of the Effects of Engine Throttle Response on Airplane Formation-Flying Qualities.” In AIAA 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930013934
  • Wan, Zhiqiang, Chao Yang, and Congqing Zou. 2003. “Divergence Experiment Prediction Techniques of Flat-Plate Forward-Swept Wing in Wind Tunnel.” In 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA 2003-1416. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-1416
  • Wang, John T. 1996. Global and Local Stress Analyses of McDonnell Douglas Stitched/RFI Composite Wing Stub Box. NASA-TM-110171. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19960020473
  • Wang, Junli. 2019. “Transonic Static Aeroelastic and Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Low-Aspect-Ratio Swept Wing.” AIP Advances 9 (4): 045203. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5087963
  • Wang, Shaonan. 2024a. “Application of a Modal Parameter Identification Method Based on Variational Mode Decomposition in Flight Flutter Testing.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2762 (1): 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2762/1/012050
  • Wang, Dan. 2024b. “Structural Mechanical Properties and Multi-Field Coupling Analysis of Variable Swept Wing Aircraft.” Mechatronic Systems and Control 52 (0). https://doi.org/10.2316/j.2024.201-0461
  • Wang, Zexin. 2026. “Modeling and Integrated Control Design for Folding-Wing Aircraft during Morphing Process.” Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management 18: e4126. https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v18.1450
  • Wang, Yu, Shuguang Hu, Tao Xiong, Yongan Huang, and Lei Qiu. 2021h. “Recent Progress in Aircraft Smart Skin for Structural Health Monitoring.” Structural Health Monitoring 21 (5): 2453–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217211056831
  • Wang, John T., Dawn C. Jegley, Harold G. Bush, and Stephen C. Hinrichs. 1996. Correlation of Structural Analysis and Test Results for the McDonnell Douglas Stitched/RFI All-Composite Wing Stub Box. NASA-TM-110267. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19960048076
  • Wang, Yiju, Cuicui Li, and Hong Dai. 2025k. “Redundancy Design and Research of Safety Fly-by-Wire Flight Control System.” IET Conference Proceedings 2024 (13): 202–7. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.2837
  • Wang, Zhaoji, Yanfeng Liu, Liyan Feng, and Shouzhao Sheng. 2026e. “Improved Active Disturbance Rejection-Based Full-Envelope Flight Control for a Coaxial Compound Helicopter with Multimodal.” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control: 01423312261465708. https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312261465708
  • Wang, Teng, Zheng Liu, Min Liao, and Nezih Mrad. 2020a. “Life Prediction for Aircraft Structure Based on Bayesian Inference: Towards a Digital Twin Ecosystem.” In Annual Conference of the PHM Society, vol. 12. https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2020.v12i1.1261
  • Wang, Zhijun, Daniël Peeters, and De Breuker Roel. 2021b. “Aeroelastic Optimisation of Manufacturable Tow-Steered Composite Wings with Cruise Shape Constraint and Gust Loads.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1024 (1): 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1024/1/012020
  • Wang, Shaobo, and Xiangyun Qing. 2016. “A Mixed Interval Arithmetic/Affine Arithmetic Approach for Robust Design Optimization with Interval Uncertainty.” Journal of Mechanical Design 138 (4): 041403. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032630
  • Wang, Yu, Lei Qiu, Yijie Luo, and Rui Ding. 2019e. “A Stretchable and Large-Scale Guided Wave Sensor Network for Aircraft Smart Skin of Structural Health Monitoring.” Structural Health Monitoring 20 (3): 861–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719850641
  • Wang, Bor-Tsuen, and Craig A. Rogers. 1991. “Laminate Plate Theory for Spatially Distributed Induced Strain Actuators.” Journal of Composite Materials 25 (4): 433–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839102500405
  • Wang, Ning, Xinbing Su, Binlin Ma, and Xiaofei Zhang. 2017b. “Numerical Study on Influence of Single Control Surface on Aero Elastic Behavior of Forward-Swept Wing.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 916: 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/916/1/012006
  • Wang, Ning, Xinbing Su, Binlin Ma, and Xiaofei Zhang. 2018c. “Numerical Study on Influence of Canard Height on Aeroelastic Behavior of Forward-Swept Wing.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 452: 042048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/452/4/042048
  • Wang, C. M., L. Wang, and K. K. Ang. 1994. “Beam-Buckling Analysis via Automated Rayleigh-Ritz Method.” Journal of Structural Engineering 120 (1): 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1994)120:1(200)
  • Wang, Yishou, Minghua Wang, Di Wu, et al. 2023b. “Time Series Analysis and Sparse Sensor Network-Based Impact Monitoring for Aircraft Complex Structures.” Structural Health Monitoring 22 (6): 4069–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217231166119
  • Wang, Zhaoyu, Liyan Wen, and Shaohua Yang. 2021c. “Aircraft System Modeling under Turbulence Conditions and Aircraft Adaptive Turbulence Compensation.” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 43 (9): 2030–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331221989007
  • Wang, Jian-qi, Kun-peng Zheng, and Dong-mei Wang. 2022c. “Aircraft Flight Control Using Method of Robustness Aimed at Uncertainty.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2187 (1): 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2187/1/012046
  • Wansaseub, K., S. Sleesongsom, N. Panagant, N. Pholdee, and S. Bureerat. 2020. “Surrogate-Assisted Reliability Optimisation of an Aircraft Wing with Static and Dynamic Aeroelastic Constraints.” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 21 (3): 723–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-019-00246-6
  • Wardlaw Jr., Morrison Andrew B., and Alfred M. 1975. Induced Side Forces on Bodies of Revolution at High Angle of Attack. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada020356
  • Wauters, Jolan. 2021. “ERGO: A New Robust Design Optimization Technique Combining Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Analytical Uncertainty Quantification.” Journal of Mechanical Design 144 (3): 031702. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052009
  • Wauters, Jolan. 2022. “Design Optimization-under-Uncertainty of a Forward Swept Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Using SAMURAI.” International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles 14: 17568293221092139. https://doi.org/10.1177/17568293221092139
  • Weatherill, Warren H., and Garabed Zartarian. 1958. Tabular Presentation of Supersonic Flutter Trends from Piston Theory Calculations. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0142154
  • Webb, Lannie D., William E. McCain, and Lucinda A. Rose. 1988. Measured and Predicted Pressure Distributions on the AFTI/F-111 Mission Adaptive Wing. NASA-TM-100443. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890006537
  • Weed, Richard A., Leland A. Carlson, and William K. Anderson. 1983. Combined Direct/Inverse Three-Dimensional Transonic Wing Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada129573
  • Wei, Xinpeng, and Xiaoping Du. 2019. “Robustness Metric for Robust Design Optimization under Time- and Space-Dependent Uncertainty through Metamodeling.” Journal of Mechanical Design 142 (3): 031110. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045599
  • Wei, Zhongcheng, Jingxia Zhan, Xi He, and Jinjun Wang. 2019. “Influence of Gurney Flaps on Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Canard-Configuration Aircraft.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 91 (4): 700–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-08-2017-0181
  • Weidemann, Henry Lawrence, and C. T. Leondes. 1979. Entrophy Analysis of Feedback Flight Dynamic Control Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada072259
  • Weinert, H. L., and Gerard G. Meyer. 1984. Strict Redundancy Schemes for Non-Sequential Detector Reliability. Part 1. Analysis. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada141875
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A. 1978. Aeroelastic Stability and Performance Characteristics of Aircraft with Advanced Composite Sweptforward Wing Structures. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/adb032318
  • Weisshaar, Terrence A. 1979. Forward Swept Wing Static Aeroelasticity. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/adb042815
  • Weisshaar, T. A. 1983. Aeroelastic Stability of Forward Swept Composite Winged Aircraft. Purdue University. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19840055636
  • Weisshaar, T. A., and S. M. Ehlers. 1990. “Static Aeroelastic Behavior of an Adaptive Laminated Piezoelectric Composite Wing.” In AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900042331
  • Weisshaar, T. A., and T. A. Zeiler. 1982. “Dynamic Stability of Flexible Forward Swept Wing Aircraft.” In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820055567
  • Wells, Scott R. 2002. Sliding Mode Control Applied to Reconfigurable Flight Control Design. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada398917
  • Wheatcroft, E. D., R. M. J. Groh, A. Pirrera, M. Schenk, and A. Castrichini. 2025a. “Gust Load Alleviation Performance of a Passively Actuated Spoiler: An Aircraft-Scale Aeroelastic Study.” Aeronautical Journal 130 (1346): 1268–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2025.10113
  • Whitbeck, Richard F., and L. G. Hofmann. 1978. Analysis of Digital Flight Control Systems with Flying Qualities Applications. Volume II: Technical Report. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada067177
  • Whitbeck, Richard F., James C. Smith, and Thomas T. Myers. 1982. Flight Test of Advanced Digital Control Concepts. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada134175
  • White, Scott R., Philippe H. Geubelle, and Nancy R. Sottos. 2005. Multiscale Modeling and Experiments for Design of Self-Healing Structural Composite Materials. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada443864
  • White, Edward V., Rakesh K. Kapania, and Shiv Joshi. 2015. Novel Control Effectors for Truss Braced Wing. NASA/CR-2015-218792. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150017734
  • White, Paul, David Mongru, and Lorrie Molent. 2017. “A Crack Growth–based Individual Aircraft Monitoring Method Utilising a Damage Metric.” Structural Health Monitoring 17 (5): 1178–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717738389
  • White Jr., Cooley Richard P., and Dale E. 1961. Hypersonic Flutter Model Results and Comparison with Piston Theory Predictions. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0328509
  • Whitehead, R. S., C. R. Foreman, and K. Silva. 1992. “C-130 Advanced Technology Center Wing Box Conceptual Design/cost Study.” In FAA, Ninth DOD(NASA)FAA Conference on Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, Volume 1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950022016
  • Whitlow, Woodrow, Jr., Robert M. Bennett, and Thomas W. Strganac. 1991. “Analysis of Aeroelastic and Resonance Responses of a Wind Tunnel Model Support System.” In International Symposium on Computational Fluid Dynamics. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930063025
  • Whitworth, H. A. 1987. “Modeling Stiffness Reduction of Graphite/Epoxy Composite Laminates.” Journal of Composite Materials 21 (4): 362–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838702100405
  • Wickman, J. G. 1953. Weight, Balance and Moment of Inertia Calculations for Structural Analysis. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada953108
  • Wiggenraad, J. F. M., and N. R. Bauld Jr. 1993. “Global/local Interlaminar Stress Analysis of a Grid-Stiffened Composite Panel.” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 12 (2). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930044546
  • Wildermuth, P., G. Rothammer, and T. Byar. 1974a. A Structural Weight Estimation Program (SWEEP) for Aircraft. Volume 11: Flexible Airloads Stand-Alone Program. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada002873
  • Wildermuth, P., G. Rothammer, and R. Hiyama. 1974b. A Structural Weight Estimation Program (SWEEP) for Aircraft. Volume 3: Airloads Estimation Module. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada002854
  • Willsky, A. S. 1984. Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis, Estimation, and Control of Stochastic Dynamic Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada147758
  • Willsky, A. S., and G. C. Verghese. 1984. Status Report on Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis, Estimation, and Control of Stochastic Dynamic Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada140931
  • Willsky, Alan S., and George C. Verghese. 1985. Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis, Estimation, and Control of Stochastic Dynamic Systems. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada166234
  • Wilson, James, Max D. Champneys, Matt Tipuric, Robin Mills, David J. Wagg, and Timothy J. Rogers. 2024. “Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output Modal Testing of a Hawk T1A Aircraft: A New Full-Scale Dataset for Structural Health Monitoring.” Structural Health Monitoring 25 (2): 1136–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217241297098
  • Wilson, David J., Kevin D. Citurs, and John B. Davidson. 1994. “High Angle of Attack Flying Qualities Criteria for Longitudinal Rate Command Systems.” In NASA. Dryden Flight Research Center, Fourth High Alpha Conference, Volume 2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950007833
  • Wilson, David J., David R. Riley, and Kevin D. Citurs. 1993. Aircraft Maneuvers for the Evaluation of Flying Qualities and Agility. Volume 2. Maneuver Descriptions and Section Guide. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada273685
  • “Wing Buffeting Control at Transonic Flight Velocities with the Use of Ejector-Type Pulse Thermal Actuators.” 2018. Прикладная механика и техническая физика, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.15372/pmtf20180406
  • Winny, H. F. 1950. “A Note on the Bending Moment Induced in the Booms of a Spar at the Point of Application of a Concentrated Load.” Aeronautical Quarterly 1 (4): 281–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001925900000196
  • Wise, Kevin A., Jack L. Sedwick, and Yutaka Ikeda. 1999. Nonlinear Control of Fighter Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada386935
  • Wissler, J., F. Gilliam, M. Robinson, and J. Walker. 1987. “Visualization of Three-Dimensional Structures about a Pitching Forward Swept Wing.” In 19th AIAA, Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics, and Lasers Conference. AIAA 1987-1322. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1987-1322
  • Witte, Joel, Svend Monson, Thomas Washington, Kris Cowart, and Rich Salasovich. 2003. An Investigation Relating Longitudinal Pilot-Induced Oscillation Tendency Ratings to Describing Function Predictions for Rate-Limited Actuators (Project MAX GAP). Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada421043
  • Wolfe, B. S. 1967. “The Concorde Automatic Flight Control System: A Description of the Automatic Flight Control System for the Anglo/French SST and Its Development to Date.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 39 (5): 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb034268
  • Wood, T. L., and C. L. Livingston. 1971. An Energy Method for Prediction of Helicopter Maneuverability. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada021266
  • Woodcock, R. J., and F. L. George. 1976. “Handling Qualities Requirements for Control Configured Vehicles.” In NASA. Dryden Flight Res. Center Advanced aa Transport Aircraft. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760024077
  • Woods, Jessica A., Michael G. Gilbert, and Terrence A. Weisshaar. 1989. Results of a Parametric Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of a Generic X-Wing Aircraft. NASA-TM-101572. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890014953
  • Wooldridge, M. J. 1960. “Aeroelastic Criterion for Leading Edge Stiffness: Determination of the Divergence Stiffness of a Supersonic Lifting Surface Subjected to Kinetic Heating.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 32 (7): 192–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb033272
  • Wrestler Jr. and Clifton G. 1965. Analytic Study of Aircraft Agility in the Turnaround Maneuver. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0622404
  • Wu, J. J. 1976. On Stability of Free-Free Beams with and without Directional Control. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada036672
  • Wu, Hansheng, and Mingcong Deng. 2015. “Robust Adaptive Control Scheme for Uncertain Non-Linear Model Reference Adaptive Control Systems with Time-Varying Delays.” IET Control Theory & Applications 9 (8): 1181–89. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2013.0973
  • Wu, Xiaohua, and Kyle D. Squires. 1995. “Three-Dimensional Boundary Layers over an Infinite Swept Bump and Free Wing.” Journal of Fluids Engineering 117 (4): 605–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2817310
  • Wu, Cunli, and Fang Tong. 2017. “Active Flutter Suppression of Stochastic Airfoil with Uncertain Pitch Stiffness.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.36959/422/431
  • X-29: Experiment in Flight. 1991a. NASA-TM-109454. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940010854
  • X-29: Research Aircraft. 1991b. NASA-TM-109370. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940014489
  • Xia, Xuanhan, Xiaofan Li, Jinfeng Zhang, Shunxiang Cao, and Guangyao Wang. 2026. “A Physics-Informed Neural Network for Fluid–structure Coupled Simulation of a Euler–Bernoulli Beam under Steady Flow.” Ocean: 9470017. https://doi.org/10.26599/ocean.2026.9470017
  • Xia, Tingting, Mian Li, and Jianhua Zhou. 2016. “A Sequential Robust Optimization Approach for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization with Uncertainty.” Journal of Mechanical Design 138 (11): 111406. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034113
  • Xiang, Biao, and Xia Liu. 2024. “Triplex Event-Triggered Recursive Quantizer-Based Networked Control System under Communication Delay and Packet Dropouts.” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 47 (9): 1859–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312241277269
  • Xiang, Jinwu, Kai Liu, Daochun Li, Chunxiao Cheng, and Enlai Sha. 2018. “Unsteady Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Morphing Wing.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 91 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-04-2017-0101
  • Xiang, Zhengchao, and Lifeng Wang. 2023. “Active Flutter Suppression for a T-Tail via Optimal Control.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 36 (5): 04023034. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-4658
  • Xie, Wei, Cheng Li, Yuefeng Wu, and Pu Zhang. 2021. “A Nonparametric Bayesian Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Stochastic Simulation.” SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification 9 (4): 1527–52. https://doi.org/10.1137/20m1345517
  • Xie, Changchuan, Yi Liu, Chao Yang, and J. E. Cooper. 2016. “Geometrically Nonlinear Aeroelastic Stability Analysis and Wind Tunnel Test Validation of a Very Flexible Wing.” Shock and Vibration 2016: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5090719
  • Xie, Changchuan, Yang Meng, Fei Wang, and Zhiqiang Wan. 2017. “Aeroelastic Optimization Design for High-Aspect-Ratio Wings with Large Deformation.” Shock and Vibration 2017: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2564314
  • Xinbing, Su, Jiang Wen, Zhao Xiwei, and Zhang Junyi. 2020. “Research on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Forward-Swept Wing with Inclined Basic Airfoil.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1605 (1): 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1605/1/012075
  • Xingjian, Wang, Yang Xinyu, and Wang Shaoping. 2024. “Review of Fault-Tolerant Control for Flight Control System.” Journal of Mechanical Engineering 60 (4): 50. https://doi.org/10.3901/jme.2024.04.050
  • Xu, Zhenming, Zhonghua Han, Zhen Zhu, and Wenping Song. 2019a. “On the Flow Mechanism of Forward Swept Natural-Laminar-Flow Wing for Crossflow Instability Suppression.” In AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. AIAA 2019-3291. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-3291
  • Xu, Xuebing, Cheng Liu, Tanay Topac, and Fu-Kuo Chang. 2026b. “Domain Adaptive Relational Graph Convolutional Network for Monitoring Transverse Matrix Cracks across Composite Structures.” Structural Health Monitoring: 14759217261457103. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217261457103
  • Xu, Ke, Shuling Tian, and Jian Xia. 2024. “Investigation of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Longitudinal-Axis Flight Control.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 37 (2): 04023111. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-5007
  • Xu, Haiyang, and Ping Wang. 2016. “Real-Time Reliability Verification for UAV Flight Control System Supporting Airworthiness Certification.” PLOS ONE 11 (12): e0167168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167168
  • Xu, Zhang, Yong Zhi Wang, Peng Wang, and Wei-Min Zhang. 2015d. “Structural Dynamic Analysis of a Hypersonic Composite Wing.” In Materials science forum, vol. 813. Trans Tech Publications. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.813.54
  • Xu, Xiao-wu, Wei Zhang, and Hao Zhan. 2018. “Analysis of Asymmetric Control Efficiency for Folding Wing Morphing Aircraft.” DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering, no. mmsta. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtcse/mmsta2017/19666
  • Xue, Ying, and Zhen Qiang Yao. 2020. “A Way to Mitigate Force-Fight Oscillation Based on Pressure and Position Compensation for Fly-by-Wire Flight Control Systems.” Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences 63 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.63.1
  • Xue, Fei, Gu Yunsong, Yuchao Wang, and Han Qin. 2021. “Research on Control Effectiveness of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring.” Science Progress 104 (1): 0036850421998137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850421998137
  • Yalvaç, Selim, Larry D. Yats, and Derrick G. Wetters. 1991. “Transverse Ply Cracking in Toughened and Untoughened Graphite/Epoxy and Graphite/Polycyanate Crossply Laminates.” Journal of Composite Materials 25 (12): 1653–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839102501206
  • Yamasaki, Tokuya, and Keinosuke Gotoh. 1971. “Stress Concentration around an Arbitrarily Shaped Hole in Infinite Thin Plate Subjected to Transverse Bending and Twisting Moments at Its Infinity.” Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers 1971 (187): 49–66. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej1969.1971.187_49
  • Yan, Farui, Lu Han, Yongqi Yang, Xuedong Xie, and Baocheng Xie. 2025. “Current Status and Development Trends of Morphing Wing of Aircraft.” Recent Patents on Engineering 19 (8): e280524230392. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118722121302573240527051750
  • Yan, Binbin, Yong Li, Pei Dai, and Muzeng Xing. 2019. “Adaptive Wing Morphing Strategy and Flight Control Method of a Morphing Aircraft Based on Reinforcement Learning.” Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University 37 (4): 656–63. https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20193740656
  • Yang, J. S., R. C. Batra, and X. Q. Liang. 1994. “The Cylindrical Bending Vibration of a Laminated Elastic Plate Due to Piezoelectric Actuators.” Smart Materials and Structures 3 (4): 485–93. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/3/4/011
  • Yang, T. Y., P. Guruswamy, and Alfred G. Striz. 1980. Flutter Analysis of a Two-Dimensional and Two-Degree-of-Freedom Supercritical Airfoil in Small-Disturbance Unsteady Transonic Flow. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada084172
  • Yang, Jann N., and M. D. Liu. 1976. Residual Strength Degradation Model and Theory of Periodic Proof Tests for Graphite/Epoxy Laminates. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada040077
  • Yang, H., and A. Przekwas. 1993. “Three-Dimensional Unsteady Separating Flows around an Oscillatory Forward-Swept Wing.” In 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference. AIAA 1993-2976. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-2976
  • Yang, Henry T. Y., and C. H. Wan. 1978. Investigation of Torsion Free Wing Trend Flutter Models. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada061942
  • Yang, Lejie, Junqiang Wu, Yang Tao, Shang Ma, Guoshuai Li, and Jifei Wu. 2025b. “Study on Leading-Edge Vortex/shock Interaction and Unsteady Characteristics of a Transonic Low-Aspect-Ratio Flying Wing.” Physics of Fluids 37 (7): 075220. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0280452
  • Yang, Lan, Changchuan Xie, and Chao Yang. 2019a. “Geometrically Exact Vortex Lattice and Panel Methods in Static Aeroelasticity of Very Flexible Wing.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 234 (3): 742–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410019885238
  • Yang, Fan, Zhufeng Yue, and Lei Li. 2016a. “The Aeroelastic Characteristics of High Aspect Ratio Wing.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 230 (14): 2543–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410016629497
  • Yang, Zhijun, Zhong Zhang, Mingming Zhang, and Shun He. 2026d. “Transonic Buffeting Control via a Nonlinear Aeroservoelastic Model of Reduced-Order.” Aeronautical Journal 130 (1349): 2319–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2026.10162
  • Yang, Zhao-Xu, Guang-She Zhao, Rong-Jing Bao, Hai-Jun Rong, and Lei-Tao Gao. 2016b. “Robust Kernel-Based Model Reference Adaptive Control for Unstable Aircraft.” Advances in Mechanical Engineering 8 (11): 1687814016677207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016677207
  • Yao, Hejun. 2018. “Finite-Time Control for Fuzzy Networked Systems with State Delay and Network-Induced Delay.” International Journal of System Control and Information Processing 2 (3): 255. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijscip.2018.092320
  • Yates, E. Carson, Jr., and Li-Chuan Chu. 1987. Static Aeroelastic Effects on the Flutter of a Supercritical Wing. NASA-TM-89132. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870012837
  • Yates, E. C., Jr., E. C. Wynne, M. G. Farmer, and R. N. Desmarais. 1981. “Prediction of Transonic Flutter for a Supercritical Wing by Modified Strip Analysis and Comparison with Experiment.” In AIAA Dyn. Specialists Conf.,. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810016896
  • Yeh, Hsien-Yang. 1988a. Stress Concentration around Circular Hole in a Composite Material Specimen Representative of the X-29A Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft. NASA-CR-179435. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880017310
  • Yeh, Hsien-Yang. 1988b. Temperature Effect on Stress Concentration around Circular Hole in a Composite Material Specimen Representative of X-29A Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft. NASA-CR-179439. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890005085
  • Yeh, Hsien-Yang, and Hsien-Liang Yeh. 1989. “Stress Concentration of the Composite Material Used by the X-29A Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft under Various Temperature Levels.” In Composite Structures 5. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1125-3_30
  • Yi, Hyun-Chul, Cheol-Jin An, and Joon-Young Choi. 2017. “Compensation of Time-Varying Delay in Networked Control System over Wi-Fi Network.” International Journal of Computers Communications & Control 12 (3): 415. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2017.3.2617
  • Yildiz, Yildiray, and Ilya V. Kolmanovsky. 2010. “A Control Allocation Technique to Recover from Pilot-Induced Oscillations (CAPIO) Due to Actuator Rate Limiting.” In American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20100033693
  • Yildiz, Yidiray, Ilya V. Kolmanovsky, and Diana Acosta. 2011. “A Control Allocation System for Automatic Detection and Compensation of Phase Shift Due to Actuator Rate Limiting.” In Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20110016004
  • Yin, Hai-peng, and Li-xin Wang. 2017. “Longitudinal Pilot-Induced Oscillation Tendencies Prediction Method of Receiver Aircraft in Hose-Drogue Aerial Refueling.” DEStech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, no. amsm. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtetr/amsm2017/14821
  • Ying, Zhang, An Liqiang, and Wang Zhangqi. 2021. “Location Effects on Bend-Twist Coupling Modes Characteristic of the Laminate Plates.” Composites and Advanced Materials 30: 26349833211057137. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349833211057137
  • Yip, L. P., and J. W. Paulson Jr. 1977. Effects of Deflected Thrust on the Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Close-Coupled Wing-Canard Configuration. NASA-TP-1090. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780005071
  • You, Junbin. 2020. “Research on Air Flight Simulation Control Law of Large Aircraft.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1678 (1): 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1678/1/012032
  • Yu, Y. Y. 1987. “Discussion: “A Composite Plate Theory for Arbitrary Laminate Configurations” (Toledano, a., and Murakami, H., 1987, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 54, Pp. 181–189).” Journal of Applied Mechanics 54 (3): 747–747. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3173110
  • Yu, Jiawen. 2018. “Design and Optimization of Wing Structure for a Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV).” Modern Mechanical Engineering 08 (04): 249–63. https://doi.org/10.4236/mme.2018.84017
  • Yu, Li, Guang He, Shuncai Rao, Lei Ye, Bowen Nie, and Xiangke Wang. 2025. “Design and Validation of a Multi-Propeller Tiltrotor UAV: From Parameter Identification to Flight Experiment.” Unmanned Systems: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2301385027500440
  • Yuan, Zhe, Shihui Huo, and Jianting Ren. 2018. “A New Jig-Shape Optimization Method for the High Aspect Ratio Wing.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 91 (1): 124–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2018-0073
  • Yuan, Guoqiang, and Yinghui Li. 2019. “Determination of the Flight Dynamic Envelope via Stable Manifold.” Measurement and Control 52 (3–4): 244–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294019830115
  • Yuan, F. G., and James R. Reeder. 2001. Crack Turning Mechanics of Composite Wing Skin Panels. North Carolina State Univ. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010069699
  • Yue, Nan, Zahra Sharif Khodaei, and M. H. Aliabadi. 2021. “Damage Detection in Large Composite Stiffened Panels Based on a Novel SHM Building Block Philosophy.” Smart Materials and Structures 30 (4): 045004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/abe4b4
  • Zauner, Markus, and Neil D. Sandham. 2020. “Wide Domain Simulations of Flow over an Unswept Laminar Wing Section Undergoing Transonic Buffet.” Physical Review Fluids 5 (8): 083903. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevfluids.5.083903
  • Zaytseva, Yu. S., N. V. Kuznetsov, B. R. Andrievsky, and E. V. Kudryashova. 2021. “Pilot-Induced Oscillation Prevention during the Aircraft Landing.” Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Маchine Building, no. 12 (741): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.18698/0536-1044-2021-12-3-10
  • Zeleke, Dinku Seyoum, Abdurehman Yimer Asfaw, Bethel Lemma Bizuneh, and Leul Walelign Michael. 2023. “Cessna 172 G1000 Aircraft Airfoil Optimization Using Particle Swarm Optimization Method Applying a Direct Airfoil Design Approach to Obtain the Maximum Lift-to-Drag Ratio.” Russian Aeronautics 66 (4): 789–98. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068799823040190
  • Zelenkov, A. A. 2018. “Imitation Modeling of the Recovery Process of the on-Board Fault-Tolerance Computer System.” Electronics and Control Systems 4 (58). https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.58.13520
  • Zhang, Changrong, Hongtao Guo, Binbin Lv, Jun Zha, and Li Yu. 2021c. “Transonic Static Aeroelastic Numerical Analysis of Flexible Complex Configuration Wing.” Shock and Vibration 2021 (1): 5553304. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5553304
  • Zhang, Xinshuai, Tingwei Ji, Fangfang Xie, Changdong Zheng, and Yao Zheng. 2022b. “Data-Driven Nonlinear Reduced-Order Modeling of Unsteady Fluid–structure Interactions.” Physics of Fluids 34 (5): 053608. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0090394
  • Zhang, K., P. Marzocca, and A. Behal. 2015a. “Adaptive Aeroelastic Control of Nonlinear Airfoil with Multiple Flaps under Unsteady Flow.” Journal of Vibration and Control 23 (10): 1593–1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546315597180
  • Zhang, Mengmeng, and Arthur Rizzi. 2017. “Aerodynamic Wing Shape Optimization Based on the Computational Design Framework CEASIOM.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 89 (2): 262–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-04-2015-0098
  • Zhang, Yang, Laiping Zhang, Xin He, Xiaogang Deng, and Haisheng Sun. 2017. “Detached Eddy Simulation of Complex Separation Flows over a Modern Fighter Model at High Angle of Attack.” Communications in Computational Physics 22 (5): 1309–32. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.oa-2016-0132
  • Zhao, Yang, and Pan Cheng. 2019. “A Loose Coupling Method on the Twist Angle Optimization of Jig Shape Wing.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1284 (1): 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1284/1/012010
  • Zheng, Junruoyu, Alessandro Pontillo, Lejun Chen, and James F. Whidborne. 2024. “Active Stall Flutter Suppression for a Revised Leishman–Beddoes Model.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 37 (1): 04023101. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-5003
  • Zhiqiang, Wan, Xiaozhe Wang, and Yang Chao. 2016. “A Highly Efficient Aeroelastic Optimization Method Based on a Surrogate Model.” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 17 (4): 491–500. https://doi.org/10.5139/ijass.2016.17.4.491
  • Zhirabok, A. N., V. F. Filaretov, A. V. Zuev, and A. E. Shumsky. 2024. “Method of Control System Fault Tolerance Based on Full or Partial Fault Decoupling.” Автоматика и телемеханика, no. 7: 15–31. https://doi.org/10.31857/s0005231024070026
  • Zhong, Deng, Yang Ying, Xia Yingjie, and Zheng Yang. 2025. “Transonic Aeroelasticity Design Method with Application to a Wing.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2977 (1): 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2977/1/012026
  • Zhou, Zan, Zheng Gong, Huitao Lyu, and Jiayang Yu. 2026b. “Flight Safety Control and Test Flight Experiments under Single-Engine Failure.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 39 (1): 04025112. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-6212
  • Zhou, Jingze, Zhidong Guan, Xiaodong Wang, Tian Ouyang, Jiahe Feng, and Zengshan Li. 2026a. “Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Strain-Based Structural Health Monitoring of Impacted Composite Stiffened Panels.” Structural Health Monitoring: 14759217251411529. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217251411529
  • Zhou, Maohui, Yanjun Li, Wenqi Liu, Wai Tuck Chow, and Xinyu Ma. 2026c. “Multiphysics-Informed Wavelet Spatio-Temporal Neural Networks for Aircraft Skin Damage Detection.” Structural Health Monitoring: 14759217261423169. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217261423169
  • Zhou, Shulong, Yanfeng Shen, Chunquan Wang, Bao Wang, and Yuan Tian. 2025b. “Piezoelectric Composite Frequency Steerable Acoustic Transducers for Impact Monitoring.” Structural Health Monitoring: 14759217251343880. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217251343880
  • Zhu, Weiren, and Haibin Duan. 2015. “Predator-Prey Biogeography-Based Optimization for Parameters Identification of UCAV Flight Control System.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 87 (3): 249–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-06-2013-0112
  • Zhu, Jiachen, Zhiwei Shi, Xi Geng, Junquan Fu, Sinuo Chen, and Yongliang Chen. 2022. “Vortex Breakdown Characteristics of Flying Wing Aircraft Based on Jet Flow Control.” Physics of Fluids 34 (2): 025112. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0076173
  • Zipperer, John, Gavin Jenney, and Jerry Bryant. 1975a. Flight Control System Reliability and Maintainability Investigations. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada012233
  • Zipperer, John, Gavin Jenney, and Jerry Bryant. 1975b. Flight Control System Reliability and Maintainability Investigations. Appendix F. Design Handbook Change Resommendations, AFSC Design Handbook, DH-2- 1, DH-2-X.. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada009156
  • Zong, Ning, Jing Sun, and Meijuan Dong. 2021. “An Optimization Design Method for Aerodynamic Configuration of High Aspect Ratio Wing.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1786 (1): 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1786/1/012024
  • Zou, Qitong, Rui Huang, Xusheng Mu, et al. 2025a. “Breaking through Flutter Barrier of Rigid-Elastic Coupling Aircraft.” Applied Mechanics Reviews 78 (2): 020801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4070097
  • Zuhairi Abdul Rashid, Syed Mohd Fairuz Syed Mohd Dardin, and Khairol Amali Ahmad. 2025. “Literature Study on Designing Control Law for Conventional Fixed-Wing UAV Using Conventional Aircraft Control Law Approach.” Journal of Defence Science, Engineering & Technology 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.58247/jdset-2025-0802-20
  • Zuhri, Muhammad Rizki. 2025. “Flight Control Design for Rudder Failure Event on Cessna 172 Aircraft.” Indonesian Journal of Aerospace 23 (1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.55981/ijoa.2025.9106
  • Zuo, Tao, Huasong Min, Tao Zhang, and Xiongxi Zhang. 2016. “The Self-Tuning Networked Control System with Online Delay Prediction.” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 39 (9): 1365–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331216636189
  • Zvonarev, V. A., and A. V. Leont’ev. 2025. “Designing Multicopters with Active Attitude Control: A Thrust Vectoring and Angular Sensor Approach.” Russian Aeronautics 68 (4): 793–800. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068799825040014
  • Комаров, Богдан Глібович, and Дмитро Миколайович Зінченко. 2019. “Vortex Generator Effect and Aerodynamic Characteristic for Canard Airplane.” Mechanics of Gyroscopic Systems 0 (37): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.20535/0203-3771372019186954
  • МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана and Т.А. Калиновский. 2016. “Comparison of Hypersonic Aircraft Quasi Horizontal Maneuver Control Methods.” Politechnical student journal, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.18698/2541-8009-2016-1-10
  • Морозов, В. С. 2015. “The Control Law of the Available Energy of the Aircraft for Automatic Go Around.” Problems of Informatization and Management 2 (50). https://doi.org/10.18372/2073-4751.2.8948

Secondary Sources

Commercial Sources

Tertiary Sources