X-Planes: Synthesis and What the Designation Became
Filed under: aerospace, history, engineering
This is the seventy-second and last article in the X-Planes series, following the X-1, the X-2, the X-3, the X-4, the X-5, the X-6, the X-7, the X-8, the X-9, the X-10, the X-11, the X-12, the X-13, the X-14, the X-15, the X-16, the X-17, the X-18, the X-19, the X-20, the X-21, the X-22, the X-23, the X-24, the X-25, the X-26, the X-27, the X-28, the X-29, the X-30, the X-31, the X-32, the X-33, the X-34, the X-35, the X-36, the X-37, the X-38, the X-39, the X-40, the X-41, the X-42, the X-43, the X-44, the X-45, the X-46, the X-47, the X-48, the X-49, the X-50, the X-51, the X-52, the X-53, the X-54, the X-55, the X-56, the X-57, the X-58, the X-59, the X-60, the X-61, the X-62, the X-63, the X-64, the X-65, the X-66, the X-67, the X-68, the X-69 through X-75, and the X-76.
An X number began as a count of instruments and still mostly is one, and what changed around it can now be measured. The first article of this series proposed that a research aircraft is an instrument built to measure one quantity that ground facilities cannot settle, and that the designation sequence is itself an object with measurable properties [X-Planes framing]. Seventy articles later the series holds a record for every design number from 1 to 76, and this article treats those records as data. Each earlier article is read for a fixed set of facts, and each stated fact is taken from the article that states it, with its quotation. What follows counts across those records instead of recalling them.
Five results carry the argument. The first is that who flew aboard changed. Of the vehicles whose design crew the articles record, 20 of 28 that entered the series before 1990 carried a pilot, and 8 of 30 after it, a difference Fisher’s exact test puts at a two-sided probability of 0.00138 under the hypothesis of no change. The second is that the numbers almost always kept their order where the record can test it. Across the 23 research design numbers whose first allocation the register of allocations dates as the A model, which covers allocations from 1997 onward, Kendall’s rank correlation between number and date is 0.984, with exactly one pair out of order, the X-49 allocated after the X-50. The third is that every skip in the register’s research series has a recorded cause, and the first of them was numerology in 2002, when the number 50 was requested for a helicopter-aeroplane hybrid described as a fifty-fifty marriage, by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, DARPA, in the register compiler’s account and by Boeing in its own [X-49] [X-69 through X-75]. The fourth is that allocations arrive in clusters. The index of dispersion of entry years by decade is 2.90 to 3.60, depending on how a number’s entry year is dated, against 1 for a process without memory. The fifth is that the numbers have recorded outcomes as well as authorised attempts since the first decade. Of the 22 flown vehicles whose articles date both events, 6 were designated after their first flight, and the earliest of them are the X-8 and the X-9, both of 1951, not the X-53 of 2006.
The purpose of the aeroplanes moved less clearly than their crews did. The share of vehicles classified as built to measure a quantity falls from 48.3 percent before 1990 to 31.4 percent after it, in the direction the first article predicted, and the difference is not established at this sample size, Fisher’s test giving 0.204. No negative result here matters more. The instrument model, the series’ organising claim, did not stop describing the designation in any way the record can detect. What changed demonstrably was who was aboard, who paid, and, twice, how the number was chosen.
The article is a synthesis and has no aircraft. Its subject is the designation system across the series, and its sources are the seventy earlier articles, the register of allocations those articles used, in a copy later than this article’s date whose differences from the version then current are stated under The Source Base, the editions of the numbering rule from 1962 to 2020, and a survey of 4,710 records on research aircraft as a class and the institutions and methods around them. It is written to answer the questions the first article asked, by name, and it states where the record does not bear the first article out.
The Questions the First Article Asked
The framing article closed by naming what this one would return to [X-Planes framing]. It asked four questions in its roadmap. What the designation became, why the clusters fall where they do, why the parallel unmanned series consumed numbers from the same pool, and whether the instrument model still describes what an X designation means. Earlier in the same article it made four further claims that it left to be tested.
- That the assignment of numbers to programmes is not total, not a function, not injective and not monotone, and that each failure records an institutional fact. Its examples were eleven unassigned numbers, the X-44 and the X-42 as failures to be a function, four programmes each holding two numbers as failures of injectivity, and the X-49 allocated after the X-50 as the one failure of monotonicity.
- That allocations cluster in time, with an index of dispersion by decade well above one, a claim it made without computing the index.
- That roughly two fifths of the designations support a full engineering treatment, the rest being cancelled, classified or administrative.
- That the proportion of programmes with a purpose other than returning information appears to rise over the period covered.
This article answers each of the eight. The answers are collected under Comparison With Ground Prediction, which in this article compares the first article’s predictions with the record the series produced, since the first article was written before any of the aircraft articles and stands to them as a prediction stands to a flight.
The Binding Unknown of a Synthesis
Every earlier article named the single unknown its vehicle existed to resolve. This article’s binding unknown is what an X number asserts about the thing it is attached to, and the measurement that resolves it is a count over the seventy articles rather than a flight. The count can be made because each article recorded the same kinds of fact, and the count has a weakness, stated in Where the Framing Breaks Down. Because the data are the series’ readings of its sources, a systematic error in how the series read its subjects would reappear here as a finding.
The Series as a Data Set
How the Ledger Reads the Series
The ledger holds one record for each of the seventy earlier articles. A record holds the vehicle’s contractor, its sponsors, the date of its designation, the start of its programme, its first and last flights, its outcome, whether anyone flew aboard, what kind of vehicle it was, the article’s statement of its keystone, a classification of that keystone, the article’s comparison of ground prediction with flight, and, for a vehicle that never flew, the reason the article gives. Every value an article states carries the article’s line number and a verbatim quotation of between 20 and 300 characters. A value the article does not state is left empty.
Three fields are classifications rather than quotations. The keystone classification, the vehicle kind and the reason a vehicle never flew are readings of each article and are reported as readings. A further 21 coding decisions enter the counts, chiefly to record the design crew of vehicles that never flew, and each of those carries a quotation as well.
The Entry Year of a Number
Most early articles do not say when their number was assigned, because the record they read does not. The register of allocations that the later articles used, which Andreas Parsch compiles from data the Department of Defense has released, begins with allocations of 1997 [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum], and the edition of the official list that it supplements gives no dates for its X rows [DOD 4120.15-L, 2004]. So the year a number entered the series has to be chosen from what is recorded, and the choice is made two ways.
The first, called P2 here, takes the register’s date of first allocation where the register has the number’s A model, then the article’s stated designation date, then the first flight, then the programme start. The second, called P1, takes the earliest of all four. P2 is closer to the date of the number and P1 is closer to the date of the programme, and every result that depends on time is computed under both and reported as a range. The X-26 has no recorded year under either and is left out of the timed counts, which cover 64 of the 65 numbers that went to a vehicle.
What the Ledger Holds
| Quantity | Count |
|---|---|
| Articles read | 70 |
| Design numbers covered | 76 |
| Articles about a number with no vehicle | 5 |
| Vehicle numbers that flew | 47 |
| Vehicle numbers built and not flown | 5 |
| Vehicle numbers not built | 12 |
| Vehicle numbers whose build state is unknown | 1 |
| Design crew recorded as crewed | 29 |
| Design crew recorded as uncrewed | 30 |
| Design crew not stated | 6 |
The five articles without a vehicle are the X-39, the X-52, the X-58, the X-67 and the block from X-69 to X-75, which together cover eleven numbers. The one vehicle whose build state is unknown is the X-63, whose article found it unknown whether any hardware was built [X-63].
The Symbols This Article Uses
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| $D$ | the set of design numbers from 1 to 76 | none |
| $P$ | the set of programmes | none |
| $R$ | the assignment relation between numbers and programmes | none |
| $\eta$ | the share of numbers that went to a programme | none |
| $\eta’$ | the same share with the X-23 counted as unassigned | none |
| $U$ | the set of unassigned design numbers | none |
| $t(n)$ | the allocation date of design number $n$ | days |
| $\tau$ | Kendall’s rank correlation between number and date | none |
| $C$ | the count of concordant pairs | none |
| $Q$ | the count of discordant pairs | none |
| $T$ | the count of pairs tied on date | none |
| $m$ | the count of numbers in an ordering | none |
| $h_k$ | the highest design number allocated before the $k$-th allocation | none |
| $n_k$ | the design number of the $k$-th allocation | none |
| $a_k$ | the advance of the $k$-th allocation over $h_k$ | none |
| $s_1$ | the share of advances equal to one | none |
| $B$ | the count of passed-over numbers later backfilled | none |
| $K$ | the number of advances | none |
| $x_j$ | the count of numbers entering in decade $j$ | none |
| $\bar{x}$ | the mean count per decade | none |
| $S^2$ | the sample variance of the counts per decade | none |
| $\mathcal{D}$ | the index of dispersion | none |
| $J$ | the number of decades | none |
| $\chi^2$ | the dispersion test statistic | none |
| $p$ | a probability under a stated null hypothesis | none |
| $H$ | the Shannon entropy of a sponsor distribution | bits |
| $J’$ | the evenness of a sponsor distribution | none |
| $r$ | the number of sponsor classes named in a decade | none |
| $q_i$ | the share of sponsor mentions in class $i$ | none |
| $\hat{\pi}$ | an observed proportion | none |
| $N$ | the size of a sample | none |
| $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$ | the four cells of a two-by-two table | none |
| $\bar{\pi}$ | the mean of two observed proportions | none |
| $N^{*}$ | the sample per period needed to detect a difference | none |
| $z$ | the standard normal quantile for 95 percent | none |
| $\Delta t$ | the interval from first flight to designation | days |
| $\psi$ | an odds ratio | none |
| $\Lambda$ | the interval from allocation to first appearance in the public register | days |
| $\sigma_0$, $\sigma_n$ | the prior and posterior standard deviation of a measured quantity | as measured |
| $I$ | the information a programme returns | bits |
Four Properties the Assignment Lacks
The first article wrote the designation system as a relation between numbers and programmes and asked whether it is total, whether it is a function, whether it is injective and whether it is monotone [X-Planes framing]. It answered no to all four and named its cases, and the series can now measure each failure. The second and third questions need to be kept apart, because the difference changes what the anomalies mean.
Writing the Assignment as a Relation
The assignment is safest written, as the first article wrote it, as a relation between the set of design numbers $D$ and the set of programmes $P$, with no assumption that it is a function,
\[R \subseteq D \times P, \qquad D = \{1, 2, \dots, 76\}\]where $(n, p) \in R$ means that design number $n$ was applied to programme $p$. The relation is a function on its domain only if no number names two programmes, or formally
\[(n, p) \in R \ \wedge \ (n, p') \in R \ \Rightarrow \ p = p'\]and it is injective only if no programme holds two numbers, the converse condition
\[(n, p) \in R \ \wedge \ (n', p) \in R \ \Rightarrow \ n = n'\]The first article kept these two conditions apart, and the distinction is not pedantry. A number with two vehicles is a record-keeping collision, and a programme with two numbers is the system counting something other than programmes.
Totality
The numbers with no programme are the X-39, which was reserved and never requested [X-39], the X-52, which was requested and refused [X-52], the X-58 and X-67, whose slots went to unmanned vehicles [X-58] [X-67], and the seven numbers from X-69 to X-75 [X-69 through X-75]. The register compiler’s page of missing designations states the first four in its own words, that the X-39 was reserved on 23 April 1997 and never formally requested, that the X-52A was disapproved because of possible confusion with the B-52 series, and that the X-58 and X-67 slots were skipped after the XQ-58A and XQ-67A were allocated [Missing USAF and DOD Aircraft Designations]. That is eleven, as the first article said, counting the X-23 as assigned because a vehicle flew under it, although the record holds no allocation request for it, so the share of the range that went to a programme is
\[\eta = \frac{\left| \{ n \in D : \exists p, \ (n, p) \in R \} \right|}{|D|} = \frac{65}{76} = 0.855\]The first article’s count stands. What the series added is that the eleven are four different kinds of absence, and the unassigned set $U$ divides accordingly,
\[|U| = |U\_{\text{reserved}}| + |U\_{\text{refused}}| + |U\_{\text{pool}}| + |U\_{\text{block}}| = 1 + 1 + 2 + 7 = 11\]with the X-39 reserved, the X-52 refused, the X-58 and X-67 taken into the drone pool and the seven of the block passed over. Counting the X-23 as unassigned instead, because no allocation request for it is recorded, changes the share by one number,
\[\eta' = \frac{64}{76} = 0.842\]so the first article’s figure is right to within one number. Read in turn, the X-39 is a number reserved, never requested and never released, and so lost whichever came first, the sequence passing it or the programme’s end, the X-52 a number refused for possible confusion with the B-52, the X-58 and X-67 numbers consumed by another series, and the block a set of seven passed over at once so that one number could be chosen.
The Assignment Fails to Be a Function Twice
The X-44 names two aircraft, the tailless F-22 derivative called MANTA, for Multi-Axis No-Tail Aircraft, which was never built, and an unmanned flying wing that flew in 2001 and was kept out of public view until 2018 [X-44]. The X-42 names two vehicles four years apart, the Upper Stage Flight Experiment to which the number was allocated and a winged reusable booster to which industry applied it informally [X-42]. These are the first article’s two cases, and they are the two numbers for which the ledger records a quotation saying that one number was applied to two vehicles. The X-23 is a contested case of a different kind, a number generally attributed to a vehicle for which the record shows no allocation request [X-23], and the X-41 is a number whose authoritative survey doubts it applied to the vehicle usually paired with it [X-41].
The Assignment Fails to Be Injective Four Times
Four programmes each hold two numbers, the four pairs the first article named, and in every case the ledger has the earlier article’s sentence saying so.
| Programme | Numbers | What distinguishes the two |
|---|---|---|
| Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile | X-11 and X-12 | configuration, two engines against three [X-11] |
| Joint Strike Fighter concept demonstration | X-32 and X-35 | contractor |
| Navy unmanned combat air vehicle | X-46 and X-47 | contractor |
| Aerospike Rocket Integration and Suborbital Experiment | X-63 and X-64 | contractor |
The Atlas pair is the same airframe in two stages of development [X-12]. The other three pairs are distinguished by contractor alone, as the X-64 article observed of the X-63 and X-64, whose two register rows differ only in the firm [X-64]. Three of the four non-injective pairs therefore record a competition, the system issuing one number per bidder rather than one per programme. In that measurable sense the X designation counts contractors, and it began with the X-32 and X-35 of the Joint Strike Fighter competition, not with the X-63 and X-64 in 2022.
Monotonicity
The first article placed the one monotonicity failure at the X-49 and the X-50, and set the X-76 apart as a skip. The X-76A was allocated on 20 October 2025, after the X-68A of 20 August 2025 and after every lower number, dates that only the later copy of the register carries [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum]. What the X-76 breaks is consecutiveness, the expectation that each new number is one more than the last. Monotonicity asks only that a higher number never be allocated before a lower one, stated as
\[n < n' \ \Rightarrow \ t(n) \le t(n')\]and the register lets it be tested directly for the numbers whose first allocation it records. Twenty-three research design numbers enter the test, being those whose first row in the register is the A model, which excludes the X-37 and X-40 because the register’s rows for them are later series. The agreement between the order of the numbers and the order of their dates is measured by Kendall’s rank correlation [Kendall, A New Measure of Rank Correlation, 1938],
\[\tau = \frac{C - Q}{\binom{m}{2}}\]where $C$ counts the pairs whose number and date are in the same order, $Q$ the pairs in opposite order, and $m$ the number of design numbers. With $m = 23$ there are 253 pairs, of which 250 are concordant, 1 is discordant and 2 are tied on date, so
\[\tau = \frac{250 - 1}{253} = 0.984\]with every pair accounted for by the identity
\[C + Q + T = \binom{m}{2}, \qquad 250 + 1 + 2 = 253\]where $T$ counts the pairs allocated on the same day.
The single discordant pair is the X-49 and the X-50, the first article’s case. The X-50A was allocated on 13 February 2002 and the X-49A on 23 May 2003. The two tied pairs are the X-46A and X-47A, allocated together on 14 May 2001, and the X-63A and X-64A, allocated together on 20 April 2022, which are two of the non-injective pairs above.
Every Skip Has a Recorded Cause
A number that is not one more than the highest number already allocated is either a skip or a backfill. Writing $h_k$ for the highest design number allocated before the $k$-th allocation and $n_k$ for the number it received, the advance is
\[a\_k = n\_k - h\_k, \qquad h\_k = \max\_{j < k} n\_j\]and a counter would give $a_k = 1$ every time. The share of advances equal to one is
\[s\_1 = \frac{\left| \{ k : a\_k = 1 \} \right|}{K} = \frac{16}{22} = 0.727\]over the register’s 22 research advances, the figure the X-67 article measured [X-67]. The remainder are five skips and one backfill, and the series has found the cause of every one of them.
| Number | Advance | Cause recorded in the series |
|---|---|---|
| X-50A | 2 | the number 50 was requested because the aircraft would be a fifty-fifty marriage of helicopter and aeroplane [Parsch, Boeing X-50 Dragonfly] [X-49] |
| X-49A | -1 | the number passed over for the X-50 was assigned to the next request [X-69 through X-75] |
| X-53A | 2 | X-52 was refused for possible confusion with the B-52 [X-53] |
| X-59A | 2 | the number 58 had gone to the XQ-58A [X-58] |
| X-68A | 2 | the number 67 had gone to the XQ-67A [X-67] |
| X-76A | 8 | DARPA chose 76 as a deliberate nod to 1776 [DARPA X-76 announcement] |
The walk obeys an identity that gives the skipped numbers a second route. The high-water mark moves only when an advance is positive, so the positive parts of the advances telescope to the span of the walk,
\[\sum\_{k=1}^{K} \max(a\_k, 0) = h\_{\text{last}} - h\_{\text{first}} = 76 - 44 = 32\]and each advance greater than one passes over $a_k - 1$ numbers. Writing $B$ for the numbers later backfilled, the numbers permanently skipped in the register era are
\[\sum\_{k=1}^{K} \max(a\_k - 1, 0) - B = 11 - 1 = 10\]which equals the count of design numbers between 44 and 76 with no research row in the register, the 52, the 58, the 67 and the seven from 69 to 75, counted directly. The two routes could have disagreed, and they do not.
Two of the five skips are numerology, one is a refusal on grounds of confusability, and two are numbers taken by the unmanned series. No skip in the register era is unexplained, although two of them, the 58 and the 67, followed from the rule rather than from anyone’s choice, and they are the first and second research numbers skipped under the issue of 16 May 2014, which made a skip permanent [X-67]. The first chosen number in the research series is the X-50 of 2002, not the X-76 of 2025, as the X-69 through X-75 article recorded, which found the number asked for because of its meaning by DARPA in the register’s note, by Boeing in its programme manager’s account to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA, and by both together in the compiler’s directory entry for the aircraft, which calls the concept a 50/50 mix of helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft [X-69 through X-75] [Parsch, Boeing X-50 Dragonfly] [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum]. What this article adds is that the only monotonicity failure in the register is that choice’s direct consequence. The X-76 is the second instance of a practice the series had already met, and what is new about it is that the choice was announced.
When the Numbers Came
The first article asserted that allocations cluster and did not compute the measure it named. It is computed here. Let $x_j$ be the number of designations whose entry year falls in decade $j$, over the $J = 9$ decades from the 1940s to the 2020s. The index of dispersion is the ratio of the sample variance to the mean,
\[\mathcal{D} = \frac{S^2}{\bar{x}}, \qquad \bar{x} = \frac{1}{J} \sum\_{j=1}^{J} x\_j, \qquad S^2 = \frac{1}{J - 1} \sum\_{j=1}^{J} \left( x\_j - \bar{x} \right)^2\]and it is 1 in expectation when counts arise from a Poisson process, a process with no memory and no clustering. Under the null hypothesis of a constant rate the statistic
\[\chi^2 = (J - 1)\,\mathcal{D}\]follows a chi-square distribution with $J - 1$ degrees of freedom, which turns the index into a test [Fisher, The Significance of Deviations from Expectation in a Poisson Series, 1950] [Cochran, Some Methods for Strengthening the Common Chi-Square Tests, 1954].
| Decade | Entries under P2 | Entries under P1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 3 | 9 |
| 1950s | 16 | 10 |
| 1960s | 6 | 7 |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 |
| 1980s | 2 | 1 |
| 1990s | 9 | 16 |
| 2000s | 14 | 8 |
| 2010s | 5 | 7 |
| 2020s | 7 | 4 |
Under P2 the mean is 7.11 per decade and the variance 25.61, so
\[\mathcal{D}\_{P2} = \frac{25.61}{7.11} = 3.60, \qquad \chi^2 = 8 \times 3.60 = 28.8\]with an upper-tail probability of 0.000342, and under P1
\[\mathcal{D}\_{P1} = \frac{20.61}{7.11} = 2.90, \qquad \chi^2 = 8 \times 2.90 = 23.2\]with probability 0.00313. For an even number of degrees of freedom the chi-square tail has a closed form, which gives a second route,
\[\Pr\left(\chi^2\_{8} > x\right) = e^{-x/2} \sum\_{i=0}^{3} \frac{(x/2)^i}{i!}\]and at $x = 28.8$ it gives 0.000342 again. The first article’s claim holds under both datings. The allocations cluster, and a constant-rate process would produce counts this uneven less than one time in three hundred.
The first article placed two clusters and one gap, and the counts show both clusters and the gap. It put clusters in the late 1940s and 1950s and in the late 1990s and 2000s, with a pronounced gap through the 1970s and early 1980s. The counts hold no third dense period, the 2010s and 2020s holding 5 and 7 numbers under P2 against a mean of 7.11. The late 1940s and the 1950s hold the rocket research aircraft and the Air Force’s missile and propulsion testbeds. The 1970s and 1980s together hold four numbers under P2. The 1990s and 2000s hold the second dense period, and the ledger shows what it was made of. Under P2 the 1990s hold the X-31, X-33, X-34, X-36, X-38, X-40, X-41, X-42 and X-44, six of them reusable-launch, entry or hypersonic vehicles, and the 2000s hold the Joint Strike Fighter pair, dated by first flight because their articles give no designation date, the X-37 and X-43, the unmanned combat air vehicle demonstrators from the X-45 to the X-47, and the numbers from the X-48 to the X-55. NASA’s inventory of 2003 describes the same shape in words, almost thirty designations from the late 1940s to the late 1970s, then largely nothing, then a resurgence in the mid to late 1990s [Jenkins et al 2003]. On the cause the counts qualify the first article, since the clusters are better described as institutional than as budgetary, and the second one coincides with new sponsors entering the series. The next section takes up those sponsors.
Who Paid
The first article described a tripartite arrangement in which a military service supplied the requirement and the money, a contractor the airframe, and the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, NACA, or its successor the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA, the research programme [X-Planes framing]. The ledger records each article’s named sponsors, which were sorted into classes. The diversity of sponsorship in each decade is measured by the Shannon entropy of the sponsor mentions [Shannon, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, 1948],
\[H = - \sum\_{i} q\_i \log\_2 q\_i\]where $q_i$ is the share of the decade’s sponsor mentions falling in class $i$. A decade whose every mention is one class has $H = 0$, and a decade spread evenly over eight classes has $H = 3$ bits.
| Decade | Vehicle numbers | Sponsor classes named | Entropy in bits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 3 | 3 | 1.46 |
| 1950s | 16 | 3 | 1.33 |
| 1960s | 6 | 5 | 2.05 |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 1.00 |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0.92 |
| 1990s | 9 | 7 | 2.35 |
| 2000s | 14 | 7 | 2.63 |
| 2010s | 5 | 4 | 1.84 |
| 2020s | 7 | 5 | 2.17 |
The 1950s are the least diverse decade with more than a handful of entries, 16 numbers whose sponsor mentions are mostly the Air Force, with NACA and the Navy alongside. Their 26 mentions are 16 Air Force, 6 NACA and 4 Navy, so
\[H\_{1950s} = - \left( \tfrac{16}{26} \log\_2 \tfrac{16}{26} + \tfrac{6}{26} \log\_2 \tfrac{6}{26} + \tfrac{4}{26} \log\_2 \tfrac{4}{26} \right) = 1.33 \ \text{bits}\]Entropy grows with the number of classes as well as with their balance, so the balance alone is measured by the evenness, the entropy divided by its maximum for the classes present, as Pielou defined it for biological collections [Pielou, The Measurement of Diversity in Different Types of Biological Collections, 1966],
\[J' = \frac{H}{\log\_2 r}\]with $r$ the number of classes named. By evenness the 1950s, $J’ = 0.842$, and the 1990s, at 0.838, are the least balanced decades, against 0.937 for the 2000s, so the Air Force’s dominance of the first dense period is a fact about balance as well as about the number of sponsors, although the 1990s spread their mentions as unevenly over seven classes. The 1990s and 2000s are the most diverse, with seven classes each, because the period added DARPA, the Air Force Research Laboratory, foreign and joint offices and NASA as a leading sponsor of its own vehicles. The 2020s add the Space Force, which appears in the register’s research rows exactly twice, both for the X-63 and X-64 [X-63]. The entropy is a description of a small sample and no test is attached to it, since a decade with eight sponsor mentions cannot carry one. What it shows is that the tripartite arrangement of the first decades had become a market of sponsors by the 1990s.
From a Pilot to Nobody Aboard
This is the change the record establishes most firmly. The first article said the meaning of the prefix drifted from a crewed research aircraft to unmanned demonstrators and asked for the drift to be counted rather than asserted. The ledger records the design crew of 59 of the 65 vehicle numbers.
| Entry before 1990 | Entry from 1990 |
|---|---|
| 20 crewed, 8 uncrewed | 8 crewed, 22 uncrewed |
The crewed share before 1990 is $\hat{\pi} = 20/28 = 71.4$ percent and from 1990 it is $8/30 = 26.7$ percent. Each proportion carries a 95 percent interval by the method of Wilson, which behaves well at small samples and near zero or one [Wilson, Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference, 1927],
\[\frac{\hat{\pi} + \dfrac{z^2}{2N} \pm z \sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{\pi}(1 - \hat{\pi})}{N} + \dfrac{z^2}{4N^2}}}{1 + \dfrac{z^2}{N}}\]with $z = 1.96$ and $N$ the sample size. The intervals are 52.9 to 84.7 percent and 14.2 to 44.4 percent, and they do not overlap. The exact test, which Fisher set out for the two-by-two table [Fisher, The Logic of Inductive Inference, 1935], asks how probable a table this lopsided would be if the crewed share had not changed. Holding the row and column totals of the two-by-two table fixed, the conditioning that Fisher’s earlier treatment of contingency tables made standard [Fisher, On the Interpretation of Chi-Square from Contingency Tables, 1922], the probability of exactly $a$ crewed vehicles in the early group is hypergeometric,
\[\Pr(a) = \frac{\dbinom{a + b}{a} \dbinom{c + d}{c}}{\dbinom{N}{a + c}}\]where $a$ and $b$ are the early crewed and uncrewed counts, $c$ and $d$ the late ones, and $N$ their total. Summing every table no more probable than the observed one,
\[p = \sum\_{x \,:\, \Pr(x) \le \Pr(a)} \Pr(x)\]gives Fisher’s two-sided probability of 0.00138. The size of the change is better stated as a difference in shares and as an odds ratio than as a probability. The difference is
\[\hat{\pi}\_{\text{early}} - \hat{\pi}\_{\text{late}} = 0.714 - 0.267 = 0.448\]and the odds ratio, the odds of a crewed vehicle before 1990 divided by the odds after, is
\[\psi = \frac{a d}{b c} = \frac{20 \times 22}{8 \times 8} = 6.88\]with a 95 percent interval by Woolf’s method on the logarithmic scale [Woolf, On Estimating the Relation Between Blood Group and Disease, 1955],
\[\exp\left( \ln \psi \pm 1.96 \sqrt{\tfrac{1}{a} + \tfrac{1}{b} + \tfrac{1}{c} + \tfrac{1}{d}} \right) = 2.17 \ \text{to} \ 21.8\]A vehicle entering the series before 1990 had about seven times the odds of carrying a pilot, and the interval excludes one by a wide margin.
The uncrewed vehicles of the two periods were different kinds of thing, and separating them sharpens the result. The uncrewed X vehicles before 1990 were missiles, rockets and one subscale entry vehicle, the X-7, X-8, X-9, X-10, X-11, X-12, X-17 and X-23, and only the X-10 was an aeroplane. Among aircraft alone, 18 of 19 before 1990 carried a pilot and 8 of 22 from 1990 did, Fisher’s test giving 0.000103, and the odds ratio is
\[\psi\_{\text{aircraft}} = \frac{18 \times 14}{1 \times 8} = 31.5\]with a Woolf interval of 3.51 to 282, wide because a single uncrewed aircraft before 1990, the X-10, is the whole of the early uncrewed cell.
Six vehicles have no design crew in their articles, and the most adverse reading assigns each of them against the finding, an early one counted uncrewed and a late one crewed. Fisher’s probability then rises to 0.014 for all vehicles and 0.00171 for aircraft, so the conclusion does not depend on the readings the articles left open. An independent compilation agrees wherever both say anything. The register compiler’s directory groups every unmanned military vehicle given an X designation after 1963 in one appendix, which lists 19 research numbers and notes the NASA-only X-33, X-34, X-38 and X-43 as outside its scope [Parsch, Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles, Appendix 4]. The ledger codes 17 of the 19 uncrewed, none crewed, and leaves the X-41 and X-51 unstated, and it codes all four NASA-only vehicles uncrewed. Reading the two unstated vehicles as the appendix does would add two uncrewed vehicles after 1990 and strengthen the result. The register’s descriptions agree from a third direction. The X-60 article counted 12 of the 31 research rows in the register describing an uncrewed vehicle, and none carrying the Q symbol that marks a drone [X-60]. A research vehicle takes X and a number whether or not anyone is aboard, to use the X-60 article’s phrasing. That sentence answers the question of what the prefix became in its first sense.
What the Aeroplanes Were For
The first article’s model treats a research aircraft as an instrument, and its fourth failure mode predicted that the share of programmes with some other purpose would rise. The ledger’s keystone classifications test that. Each article’s stated keystone is classified by a reading of the article.
| Keystone class | Vehicle numbers |
|---|---|
| measurement of a quantity ground facilities could not settle | 25 |
| demonstration that known pieces work together | 27 |
| a central result that is analytical, the vehicle not needed for it | 5 |
| winning a procurement | 4 |
| developing a weapon or its airframe | 3 |
| no research question | 1 |
Fewer than half the vehicle numbers in the series are classified as measurement, 25 of 65, a figure that already qualifies the instrument model,
\[\hat{\pi}\_{\text{measure}} = \frac{25}{65} = 0.385, \qquad \text{95 percent interval } 0.276 \text{ to } 0.506\]and this share is the basis for saying that the model describes about two fifths of the vehicles. Before 1990 the measurement share is 14 of 29, 48.3 percent with a Wilson interval of 31.4 to 65.6 percent, and from 1990 it is 11 of 35, 31.4 percent with an interval of 18.6 to 48.0 percent. The fall is in the predicted direction and Fisher’s test gives 0.204, so a difference of this size would arise by chance about one time in five. The first article’s prediction is therefore not confirmed and not refuted. It is unestablished at the size of the series, and the size of the shortfall can be stated. For two shares $\hat{\pi}_1$ and $\hat{\pi}_2$ with mean $\bar{\pi}$, the number of vehicles needed in each period for a two-sided test at the 5 percent level to detect the difference four times in five is, by the normal approximation for two independent proportions [Fleiss, Tytun and Ury, A Simple Approximation for Calculating Sample Sizes for Comparing Independent Proportions, 1980],
\[N^{*} = \frac{\left( z\_{0.975} \sqrt{2 \bar{\pi} (1 - \bar{\pi})} + z\_{0.80} \sqrt{\hat{\pi}\_1 (1 - \hat{\pi}\_1) + \hat{\pi}\_2 (1 - \hat{\pi}\_2)} \right)^2}{\left( \hat{\pi}\_1 - \hat{\pi}\_2 \right)^2}\]with $z_{0.975} = 1.96$ and $z_{0.80} = 0.84$. Substituting the observed shares,
\[\hat{\pi}\_1 = 0.483, \qquad \hat{\pi}\_2 = 0.314, \qquad \bar{\pi} = 0.399\]gives $N^{*} = 131$ against the 29 and 35 vehicles the two periods hold. The series is about a quarter of the size the question needs.
What does show in the record is that the departures from the instrument model are old. The X-9, X-11 and X-12 were weapon development airframes in the 1950s, the X-16 was a reconnaissance aeroplane whose designation served as security cover [X-16], and the X-27 was always intended as a prototype for production [X-27]. NASA’s 2003 inventory makes the same point about the Joint Strike Fighter demonstrators, recording criticism that the designation had been corrupted by prototypes of operational aircraft and answering that the practice was not new, with the X-11, X-12 and X-27 as precedent [Jenkins et al 2003]. The designation has carried procurement since its first decade, and the series cannot show that it carries more of it now.
Eighteen Vehicles That Did Not Fly
Of the 65 vehicle numbers, 18 had not flown by their articles’ dates, being 12 not built, 5 built and not flown, and the X-63, whose build state is unknown. Three of them belong to programmes still running at their dates, the X-65, X-68 and X-76, and are not failures of anything. That leaves fifteen vehicles whose programmes ended without a flight, or 23 percent of the vehicle numbers in the series,
\[\hat{\pi}\_{\text{ended unflown}} = \frac{15}{65} = 0.231, \qquad \text{95 percent interval } 0.145 \text{ to } 0.346\]so somewhere between about one in seven and about one in three X vehicles was never asked a question in the air.
The series’ articles set out a taxonomy of the reasons, and the ledger lets it be counted.
| Reason the article gives | Vehicles |
|---|---|
| absence of demand, nobody wanted the aeroplane | X-6, X-20, X-27 |
| absence of knowledge, the thing to be shown could not be shown achievable first | X-30, X-42 |
| an answer nobody wanted, the demonstrator worked and its number did not close | X-33 |
| ready and scrapped, the vehicle was finished and never asked a question it could fail | X-34, X-60 |
| superseded, cancelled for another programme, or no reason recorded | X-16, X-46, X-54, X-57, X-63, X-64, X-66 |
The first four rows are the series’ own classes, set out by the X-33 and X-34 articles when they completed a set of four [X-33] [X-34]. The ledger adds two things to them. The X-60 joins the X-34 as a vehicle that reached its last reported milestone before flight and stopped [X-60], so the X-34 is not the only one that was ready. And the fifth row is the largest, seven of fifteen. A vehicle cancelled for another programme, or stopped with no recorded reason, does not fit a taxonomy built from programmes whose reasons were argued in public. The finding concerns the record rather than the vehicles. The later the programme, the less often its end is explained, since six of the seven in the fifth row entered the series after 2000.
The Number Before and After the Flight
The series met a set of orderings between a designation and its aeroplane, and the late articles collected them. A number allocated before the aeroplane existed is the expected case. The X-53 was designated after it stopped flying, the X-54 was designated and never flew, the X-55 flew and was designated 139 days later, and the X-62 was designated after twenty-nine years of flight under another name [X-62]. Collected together, these read as a pattern of the late series, and the ledger shows that the pattern is older.
Writing $\Delta t$ for the interval from first flight to designation,
\[\Delta t = t\_{\text{designation}} - t\_{\text{first flight}}\]a positive value means the aeroplane flew first. Of the 22 vehicles that flew and whose articles date both events, 6 have $\Delta t > 0$,
\[\hat{\pi}\_{\Delta t > 0} = \frac{6}{22} = 0.273, \qquad \text{95 percent interval } 0.132 \text{ to } 0.482\]and the three intervals the record dates to the day are
\[\Delta t\_{\text{X-28}} = 349, \qquad \Delta t\_{\text{X-55}} = 139, \qquad \Delta t\_{\text{X-62}} = 10658 \ \text{days}\]spanning almost two orders of magnitude.
| Number | First flight | Designation | Interval |
|---|---|---|---|
| X-8 | 2 December 1949 | May 1951 | about seventeen months |
| X-9 | April 1949 | 1951 | about two years |
| X-28A | 12 August 1970 | 27 July 1971 | 349 days |
| X-53A | late 2002 | 16 August 2006 | more than a year after the last flight in March 2005 |
| X-55A | 2 June 2009 | 19 October 2009 | 139 days |
| X-62A | 9 April 1992, by one account | 14 June 2021 | 10,658 days, or 29.2 years |
NASA’s fact sheet for the X-53’s programme dates its first research flights to late 2002 and its second phase’s last to March 2005 [NASA, Active Aeroelastic Wing Flight Research, FS-2005-03-061 DFRC]. The earliest are the X-8 and the X-9, a sounding rocket and a subscale development article for a guided missile, both designated retrospectively in 1951 when the research-and-test-vehicle series they belonged to was folded into the X series [X-8] [X-9] [X-10]. The compiler’s directory gives both redesignations, the RTV-A-4 becoming the X-9 in 1951 with its flight tests continuing to January 1953, and the RTV-A-5, ordered in 1950, becoming the X-10 in 1951 two years before its first flight [Parsch, Bell RTV-A-4/X-9 Shrike] [Parsch, North American RTV-A-5/X-10]. The X-7 is part of the same fold. It predates its designation by five years, although its first launch and its designation fall in the same year [X-7]. The X-8 article dates the redesignation of the RTV-A-1 to 1951, and to May 1951 on the compiler’s account, seventeen months after the first Air Force flight of 2 December 1949, and every dated reading it found falls after that flight, the 1949 of one list being a first-flight year and the 1955 given elsewhere having no support in the sources it read [X-8]. The X-28A is a homebuilt aeroplane the Navy watched fly, bought, and designated, on a date its article takes from a single reported account, so the X designation was applied to a purchase, and the research it marked was an evaluation of something already built [X-28]. A designation given after flight therefore spans the series, from 1951 to 2021, and the register has recorded outcomes as well as authorising attempts from its first decade.
How Answerable the Question Was
The series’ articles describe a spectrum of how answerable a research question was, and the late articles add a second, of how much of the question could be settled without the aeroplane. The ledger’s ground-comparison field puts a count on the first. For each of the 47 vehicles that flew, the ledger records what the article’s section headed Comparison With Ground Prediction concluded.
| What the comparison concluded | Vehicles that flew |
|---|---|
| flight confirmed the ground prediction | 6 |
| flight confirmed part and contradicted part | 23 |
| flight contradicted the prediction outright | 0 |
| the article compared nothing with flight | 14 |
| no flight data reached the article | 4 |
No article recorded flight contradicting its ground prediction outright, and the commonest result is a mixed one, 23 of 47. Among the 29 articles whose comparison reached flight data the mixed share is
\[\hat{\pi}\_{\text{mixed}} = \frac{23}{29} = 0.793, \qquad \text{95 percent interval } 0.616 \text{ to } 0.902\]so a comparison that reached flight data more likely than not found part of the ground prediction wrong. A mixed verdict is the outcome the first article’s information model predicts. A flight programme exists because some quantity is outside what ground facilities settle, and such a programme naturally returns agreement on the quantities the facilities could settle and disagreement on the residue. The number of comparisons that compared nothing, 14, is a fact about the record. They are concentrated among the missile testbeds, the competitors and the uncrewed demonstrators, for which the public record holds flight dates and few flight measurements.
The contemporary literature supplies a clean instance of a mixed verdict on one of the series’ aeroplanes. Six independent predictions of the X-56A’s body freedom flutter all agreed with one another and all placed the flutter speed 10 to 20 knots above the speed the aeroplane measured [Ouellette et al 2026]. The methods agreed on the physics and disagreed with flight on the number, the residue a research aircraft exists to measure.
The Information a Programme Returns
The first article sized a programme by the information it returns. For a quantity known before the programme with standard deviation $\sigma_0$ and after it with standard deviation $\sigma_n$, the information gained is
\[I = \frac{1}{2} \log\_2 \frac{\sigma\_0^2}{\sigma\_n^2}\]in bits, and the X-1 example in the first article, whose variance ratio was 400, returned
\[I\_{\text{X-1}} = \frac{1}{2} \log\_2 400 = 4.32 \ \text{bits}\]on one number [X-Planes framing]. The relation’s lesson for a synthesis is that the series can show information returned only for the vehicles whose comparison reached flight data, 29 of the 65 vehicle numbers when the confirmed and mixed rows are taken together. The remainder are not failures of the model. Many of them flew and returned data that the public record does not report, and the model has nothing to measure them with.
The Pool Shared With the Drones
The first article asked why the parallel unmanned series consumed numbers from the same pool, and the series found an answer in the rule itself. The rule as issued on 16 May 2014 [X-67] and reissued jointly in 2020 [Department of the Air Force Instruction 16-401, 2020] defines the next designator from the last approved design number in the basic mission series and refuses requests in reverse or skipped sequences, a written request being sent by the programme office to a single Air Force control point, which recommends a designation for decision at Air Force headquarters [Allocation of Official Aerospace Vehicle MDS Designations], and the X-67 article showed what that does to a number borrowed by another series [X-67]. A design number borrowed for an unmanned vehicle should equal its source series’ next number at the moment of the borrowing and no other series’, and across six out-of-sequence unmanned numbers tested against twenty basic missions, the test fires twice and names the research series both times, for the XQ-58A and the XQ-67A. Nobody had to decide to skip the X-67, and somebody had to ask for the X-68.
The register’s notes make the source explicit. The compiler’s note on the XQ-58A records that the out-of-sequence number 58 of the Kratos Valkyrie was taken from the X series and that there is no X-58, and the note on the XQ-67A states that its number was taken from the X series [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum]. In the register, nine of the design numbers among its 69 Q rows are out of the Q sequence, and the compiler’s notes give a source for five of them,
\[\frac{9}{69} = 0.130\]of the drone rows. Two came from the research series, the 58 and the 67. The RQ-170’s number came from the manufacturer’s project number, the YFQ-48A’s apparently follows the F-47 in the fighter series, and the XRQ-73A’s was probably chosen to follow the XRQ-72A. For the 35, the 42, the 44 and the 72 the notes give no source or call it unclear [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum]. The YFQ-48A is a founding-year number’s descendant, a drone numbered to follow a fighter numbered in part for 1947.
The reason the pool is shared is therefore not that the X and Q series are one series. It is that an unmanned research vehicle sits on the boundary between them, and in two cases the services resolved that boundary by giving such a vehicle the drone’s mission symbol and the research series’ number. The X-60 article stated the converse, that a research vehicle takes X and a number whether or not anyone is aboard [X-60]. Both resolutions coexist in the register, which is why the pool is shared at all.
The Number Became a Message
The register’s copy of 23 August 2026 holds three design numbers chosen to match the last two digits of a founding year, and all three fall within 329 days. The YMV-75A was allocated to the Army on 25 November 2024 for 1775, the F-47A went to the Air Force for 1947, and the X-76A went to DARPA on 20 October 2025 for 1776 [X-69 through X-75], so the class spans
\[t(\text{X-76A}) - t(\text{YMV-75A}) = 329 \ \text{days}\]from first to last. The Army’s designation announcement explains the 75 as commemorating the Army’s founding year, 1775 [Army MV-75 announcement]. The Air Force’s contract announcement for the F-47 [Air Force F-47 announcement] was followed by a statement giving the 47 three meanings, the P-47, the founding year of the Air Force and the 47th President, so the founding year is one meaning among three, and released public affairs correspondence names General Allvin as the officer who made the decision [Air Force public affairs correspondence on the F-47] [X-69 through X-75]. DARPA’s X-76 announcement [DARPA X-76 announcement] and Bell’s release of the same day reporting the official designation [Bell X-76 release] complete the public record of the three. The X-69 through X-75 article measured how improbable the X-76’s seven unreleased predecessors would be under the series’ allocation rate, a Poisson tail of 1.83e-10, and found that the 2020 rule provides no instrument for reserving a block.
The section on skips above shows that the practice is older than the class. The X-50 of 2002 was chosen for a numerical pun, the fifty-fifty marriage of helicopter and aeroplane, and the register’s note on the X-50A records that DARPA explicitly requested the number, while Boeing’s account gives the request as its own [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum] [X-49]. The allocation procedure leaves room for a chosen number. The compiler’s account of it states that a written request must include a suggestion for the new designation, that a number can be requested when the requester particularly likes it, and that the control point’s recommendation may or may not be the designation the requester proposed [Allocation of Official Aerospace Vehicle MDS Designations]. A chosen number is therefore a suggestion the deciding office accepted, and since the issue of 16 May 2014 the rule’s written discretion to skip is what lets it accept one out of sequence, a provision the issue in force in 2002 did not contain [X-52]. What changed between 2002 and the X-76 is the publicity. The X-50’s reason is recorded in a compiler’s note and a contractor’s account, while the X-76’s was the headline of the announcement. A number that is announced as a message is a number whose purpose includes being read by the public, a different object from a sequence index read by a records office.
The Register Stopped Being the Government’s Voice
The X-61 article made the finding this synthesis most needs, a finding about the register rather than any aeroplane. The register’s compiler states that no complete official data on designations assigned after October 2018 is available and that for later allocations the official description is no longer releasable, so such descriptions are marked as the compiler’s own [X-61]. Among the rows the register dates in full, the last official research description is the X-60A’s of 7 September 2018 and the first unofficial one is the X-61A’s of 6 June 2019.
The register’s markup has three states, not two. Counted from all 539 rows of the register, the 31 research rows divide into 21 official, 7 whose description cell is the compiler’s, 2 whose whole row is absent from officially released data, and 1 partly marked [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum],
\[21 + 7 + 2 + 1 = 31, \qquad \frac{21}{31} = 0.677\]so about two thirds of the register’s research rows carry the government’s own wording throughout. On this article’s date, before the X-68A and X-76A rows were added, the share was 21 of 29, or 0.724. For the rows the register dates in full, the series divides at the X-60, the official description of what each aeroplane was for being available up to it and withheld after it. Two rows with partial dates are unofficial in the stronger sense of being absent from released data altogether, the X-37B of 2006 among them. What is withheld after the X-60 is a single sentence, since the date, designation, contractor, engine and sponsor remain official.
And the register lags the allocations by months. The X-68A and X-76A rows did not appear in the public register until between 15 January and 1 February 2026, by archived copies, the capture of 15 January 2026 showing neither row and that of 1 February 2026 showing both [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, as archived on 10 December 2025] [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, as archived on 15 January 2026] [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, as archived on 1 February 2026], which the X-69 through X-75 article established. Writing $\Lambda$ for the interval from allocation to first public appearance, the two captures bound it,
\[148 < \Lambda\_{\text{X-68A}} \le 165, \qquad 87 < \Lambda\_{\text{X-76A}} \le 104 \ \text{days}\]so the register published each row three to five months after the number existed. The newest research numbers were invisible in the public register on the dates of the articles that describe them, and the series’ account of what was knowable when has to use the date a row first appeared, not the date of the allocation.
The federal award record, which records what the government paid for these aeroplanes, has three times shown no use for the number. The X-62 article found 73 transactions against the aeroplane from February 2014 to September 2025, totalling 29,085,924.37 dollars, and not one of them writes down the number allocated in June 2021 [X-62] [USAspending]. The X-63 article found a vehicle bought under an other transaction agreement, which a search of the federal award record under the names the programme is known by does not find [X-63], for a programme the Air Force Research Laboratory’s fact sheet describes as its most ambitious technology demonstrator yet in its modular rocket portfolio [Air Force Research Laboratory, ARISE fact sheet], and in the X-76 article Bell’s instrument is missing from the award record [X-76]. A designation is a claim about a vehicle’s purpose made by one part of a government to another, and the parts that buy the fuel have no use for it.
What the Record Measures
The first article said the record thins sharply after about 2000, and a direct count of the thinning by designation is not usable. A count of the reports-server records whose titles name each design number from 1 to 76 is confounded in three ways. The quoted query for the X-1 is dominated by X-ray sources named in the same form, the server indexes X-43 and X-43A as different words and returns 45 and 57 records for them, and the X-24’s first hundred records contain no title naming it. A title count by designation measures the server’s tokeniser as much as the literature, and no number from such a count appears in this article.
What the series can say is narrower and is measured. The X-33 article found that 71 of the 78 survey titles carrying its designation predate 2002 and that the latest is dated 2017, and the X-34 article that 37 of the 39 research records whose titles carry its designation date from 2001 or earlier, both programmes having been cancelled in 2001 [X-33] [X-34], and the X-32 article counted exactly one record carrying the losing competitor’s designation in a cited set of 3,528 against 38 for the winner’s production designation [X-32]. In those three cases the documentary trace of a vehicle measures how long its programme survived and whether it won, more than what it contributed. The NASA cost engineers who built a parametric model of X-plane costs reached the same limit from the other side, ending their account with a call for accurate and traceable cost data from historical X-plane records [Sterk et al 2016].
Comparison With Ground Prediction
In the earlier articles this section set a ground facility’s prediction beside what flight returned. In this one the ground prediction is the first article, written before any of the seventy aircraft articles, and the flight is what those articles found. Each of the first article’s testable claims is set beside the measurement.
| The first article’s claim | What the series measured | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| eleven numbers in the range have no programme | eleven, of four different kinds | confirmed |
| the assignment is not a function, at the X-44 and the X-42 | both numbers are recorded as naming two vehicles | confirmed |
| injectivity fails at four pairs | the same four pairs, three of them distinguished by contractor alone | confirmed |
| monotonicity fails once, the X-49 after the X-50, and the X-76 is a skip | that pair is the one discordant pair of 253, Kendall’s $\tau$ of 0.984 | confirmed |
| allocations cluster, with an index of dispersion well above one | 2.90 to 3.60, with $p$ of 0.000342 to 0.00313 | confirmed |
| clusters in the late 1940s and 1950s and the late 1990s and 2000s, with a gap in the 1970s and early 1980s | both clusters and the gap | confirmed |
| the clusters track procurement and budget cycles | they coincide with new sponsors entering, which is institutional rather than budgetary | partly confirmed |
| roughly two fifths of the designations support a full treatment | 47 of 76 numbers went to something that flew, about three fifths | the share of real flight vehicles is larger than predicted |
| the prefix drifted from crewed research aircraft to unmanned demonstrators | crewed share from 71.4 to 26.7 percent, $p$ of 0.00138 | confirmed and measured |
| non-informational purposes rise over the period | measurement share from 48.3 to 31.4 percent, $p$ of 0.204 | not established |
The two-fifths row needs a note. The first article’s two fifths was a prediction about how many articles could be written at full length, and most articles did not record their class, so the row tests the nearest quantity the ledger holds, the count of numbers given to something that flew,
\[\frac{47}{76} = 0.618, \qquad \frac{47}{65} = 0.723\]of all numbers and of the numbers that went to a vehicle. Of the ten rows, seven are confirmed, one partly confirmed and one not established, and the remaining row finds more real flight vehicles than predicted. The four formal claims all hold, and a framing article is most exposed on such claims, since it wrote down its definitions before it had the data. The qualifications fall on the cause of the clustering and on purpose. The confirmation that matters most is the crewed share, because it is the one the first article called its principal historical finding and asked to be counted.
The first article also asked whether the instrument model still describes what an X designation means. The answer the ledger supports is that it describes about two fifths of the vehicles across the series, 25 of 65 classified as built to measure, and that the other three fifths were never the model’s subject. What changed, as far as the record can tell, is not the share of instruments. It is that the instrument now usually flies without a pilot, is paid for by a wider spread of agencies and laboratories, and is no longer described in the register in the government’s own words.
Where the Framing Breaks Down
The data are the series’ own readings of its sources. Every count in this article is a count over what seventy earlier articles concluded, so an error that ran through the series’ way of reading would reappear here as a result. Each value is quoted from the article that states it, which establishes that the value is what the article says. It does not establish that the article was right.
The keystone classes are one reader’s classification per article. Each article’s keystone is classified by one reader with no second classification, so there is no measure of agreement between readers. The classification that matters most, measurement against everything else, is recorded with its alternatives in each record, so the counts can be recomputed under any other coding.
The entry year of an early number is a proxy. Most articles before the X-37 do not date their designation. The two datings used here disagree by up to twenty-nine years for one number, the X-62, whose aeroplane first flew in 1992 and whose number came in 2021, and the results are reported under both. The decade boundaries are arbitrary too, and a clustering result that survived only one choice of boundary would be weak. This one survives both datings, and a finer or coarser bin was not tried, so robustness to the bin width is not claimed.
The tests are several, and each is reported at its own probability. Seven probabilities are reported, four for the crewed share, one for the purpose share and two for the clustering. The Bonferroni correction for seven tests multiplies the crewed result’s probability by seven and errs on the side of caution [Dunn, Multiple Comparisons Among Means, 1961],
\[7 \times 0.00138 = 0.0097 < 0.01\]and the result survives it, while the purpose result was not significant before any correction. No other result in this article rests on a test.
The unit is the number, and the number is not always one vehicle. The X-24A and X-24B are one number and one airframe rebuilt, the X-44 is one number and two aircraft, and the X-63 and X-64 are two numbers and one programme. Where the ledger had to choose, it took the vehicle that flew or the earliest one, and each such choice is in the record’s notes.
The Contemporary Literature
| Cluster | Records |
|---|---|
| Research aircraft and their history | 786 |
| Flight research and flight test as a method | 1,468 |
| Identifying a model from flight data | 178 |
| Ground facilities against flight | 224 |
| Demonstrators, prototyping and the acquisition system | 258 |
| The uncrewed turn | 294 |
| Hypersonic and space-access flight research | 617 |
| Vertical-flight research aircraft | 626 |
| The sponsoring institutions | 164 |
| Designation and nomenclature | 3 |
| The history and philosophy of engineering | 75 |
| The technical-report literature | 17 |
| Total | 4,710 |
The survey asks what the literature says about the research aircraft as a class, and so it is not a survey of any one aircraft’s subject, each of which the seventy earlier articles surveyed in turn. It gathers the history of research aircraft and flight research, flight research as a method and its instruments, the comparison of ground facilities with flight, the demonstrator and the acquisition system that buys it, the uncrewed turn, hypersonic and space-access flight research, vertical-flight research aircraft, the institutions that sponsor the work, aerospace designation and nomenclature, the history and philosophy of engineering knowledge, and the technical-report literature the series drew on. Its 4,710 records fall in the twelve clusters above, and its sources and admission rule are set out under The Source Base.
The State of the Literature
The literature written about X-planes as a class is mostly history, and the history stops early. The standard institutional accounts describe the arrangement in which the research aircraft were built, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics as an institution in which technology and institution shaped each other [Roland 1984], the Langley laboratory’s organisation and its cooperation with industry and the military [Hansen 1986], and the laboratory’s partnership with the Department of Defense through the 1990s [Chambers 2000]. The flight-research histories trace the method from Cayley through the X-15 [Gorn 2001], the flight research centre where most of the series flew has histories covering it from 1946 [Hallion 1984] [Wallace 1996] and an annotated bibliography of its technical publications from 1946 to 2006 [Fisher 2007], and the NACA research airplanes have a selected history of their contributions [Hallion and Peebles 2014], the last known here from its title alone. Hallion’s history runs from the supersonic era to the space shuttle with the flight chronologies of the aircraft, and Wallace’s covers every major research aircraft and lifting body NASA studied there from the X-1 to the X-31, and the X-15 has a history that its author called a first step toward the history it lacked [Jenkins 2000] [Jenkins 2007]. The one inventory of the whole designation range in the survey stops at the X-50 and states this series’ clustering claim and its purpose claim independently, describing almost thirty designations from the late 1940s to the late 1970s, a gap, a resurgence in the late 1990s, and criticism of prototypes in the series that it answers with the X-11, X-12 and X-27 [Jenkins et al 2003]. A later book carries the range to the X-60, and no abstract for it was retrievable, so it is cited for its title [Gorn and De Chiara 2021].
The newest class-level literature is NASA managing the X-plane as a product, and the records of that kind in the survey date from 2015 onward. A parametric cost model running from the X-1 to the X-Wings was presented in 2015, and only its title was read here [Sterk and McAtee 2015]. NASA’s cost engineers then built an X-plane database and parametric cost model whose variables include whether the aircraft is manned or unmanned, and closed by asking for accurate and traceable cost data from historical X-plane records [Sterk et al 2016]. A later study used historical cost and schedule data to estimate how far programmes exceed their reserves [Sterk et al 2018], and a conceptual design process aimed at a large X-plane flying within three years of contract award for under 100 million dollars [Welstead et al 2017]. NASA’s Office of the Chief Engineer evaluated the agency’s project and risk processes for piloted X-planes and found none fully appropriate for governing experimental aircraft [Hirshorn and Kemmerly 2018], and a workshop of more than sixty engineers, researchers and others in May 2019 gathered fifty years of X-plane practice into lessons on organisation, life cycle, flight and risk [Hirshorn et al 2024]. The choice between a crewed and an uncrewed mid-sized X-plane appears in this literature as a subjective analysis of risk and complexity [Lechniak 2017]. In it the series’ crewed-share finding appears as seen from inside the agency making the choice.
Work on ground against flight is now about computation, and the residue it describes has not gone away. A NASA account of the X-36, X-45A and X-48B describes computation and wind tunnels complementing, calibrating and verifying one another before flight [Cosentino 2007]. Tunnel data at Reynolds numbers an order of magnitude below flight still have to be extrapolated, and a 2024 method fixes the extrapolation exponents from two subscale tests [Traub 2024]. The X-56A’s flutter was over-predicted by every method in a workshop of six [Ouellette et al 2026]. System identification from flight data has become routine enough to be reviewed by institution, with NASA Langley’s review naming X-planes and subscale demonstrators among its examples [Grauer 2024].
The acquisition literature recommends prototyping and has not settled how to do it well. A RAND synthesis of thirty years of acquisition research recommended austere prototyping and found programme outcomes improving over time [Improving the Military Acquisition 1986], and a 2014 study found that prototyping still lacked a knowledge-based approach [Coble et al 2014]. Cost growth on aircraft work-breakdown elements is fitted best by lognormal or Weibull distributions whose upper percentiles budgets underestimate [Marquiz et al 2025]. A supersonic demonstrator outside the designation, the XB-1, has a published account of its development and flight testing, cited here for its title [Veletas 2026].
Writing on uncrewed aircraft has moved from whether to fly without a pilot to how many uncrewed aircraft one pilot can direct. Work on manned and unmanned teaming proposes an operator capacity model relating the number of unmanned systems to communication latency and machine support [Korecki and Hoika 2026], and an Australian account describes the move from remotely piloted aircraft to autonomous collaborative platforms in terms of affordable mass [Joyce 2026]. The X-62 was redesignated to serve that question, an autonomy question asked of an aeroplane with a pilot aboard [X-62].
In vertical flight the series’ newest aircraft and its oldest unsolved problems meet. A 2026 computational study calls the conversion between hover and cruise one of the most complex and hazardous aspects of tiltrotor operation [Sridhar and Smith 2026]. A wind-tunnel testbed is still measuring whirl flutter across rotor speed, pitch-flap coupling and stiffness to give analysis its validation data [Thornburgh et al 2025], and a dynamically scaled swept-tip proprotor tested to 200 knots found its comprehensive analysis predicting the stability trends in general and not the torsion mode [Delgado et al 2026]. Those are the limits the X-76 was configured to avoid by stopping its rotor [X-76]. NASA’s newest vertical-flight research aircraft was presented in 2026 under the name RAVEN, for Research Aircraft for eVTOL Enabling techNologies, an electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft, rather than an X number [Whiteside and Welstead 2026].
Most of what is written about the institutions is written by the institutions themselves. NASA’s overview of its sustainable aviation work in 2021 describes the coming changes as the most substantial since jet engines and swept wings converged more than sixty years earlier [Kenyon et al 2021], and the X-66 was designated to serve that programme [X-66]. The National Research Council’s assessments of NASA aeronautics of 2006, 2008 and 2012 are cited for their titles, the last being titled as the recapture of NASA’s aeronautics flight research capabilities [Decadal Survey of Civil 2006] [NASA Aeronautics Research 2008] [Recapturing NASA’s Aeronautics Flight 2012]. NASA’s technical histories of single subjects also take a longitudinal view, Loftin’s of the evolution of the subsonic aeroplane’s configuration [Loftin 1985] and Henderson and Huff’s of jet noise research from the early 1950s, which ends with noise for supersonic commercial aircraft still an area of NASA’s research [Henderson and Huff 2021].
Hypersonic research still describes flight as the final test. NASA’s account of its hypersonic X-plane family of 1997 called in-flight experimentation the ultimate crucible for proving technology readiness [Hicks and Trippensee 1997], and DARPA’s experimental spaceplane programme has a published account of its findings whose title alone was consulted here [Wierzbanowski and Ramasubramanian 2020].
One silence is measured, and it concerns this series’ subject. The designation and nomenclature cluster holds 3 records. Annual tables titled Designations of Aircraft in a military reference work are parts of that work rather than separate works and are not counted, and of the 3 the one analytical record is a history of military naming in another country, which finds naming policy always susceptible to the political climate [Cowling 2012]. No title among the survey’s 4,710 records names the United States research designation sequence as its subject, and none names its crewed share, its skips or its ordering. The first article predicted that silence, and the survey measures it. Outside the survey it is broken chiefly by the specialist register this series used throughout [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum].
And the technical-report literature has a history that explains part of the series’ source gradient. The National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 directs the agency to provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof [National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958], and the reports server was built in the 1990s to meet that requirement [Nelson et al 1995], and its later fate was the subject of a 2014 paper known here by its title [Takahashi 2014]. Dryden’s annotated bibliography lists nearly 2,900 unclassified technical reports and papers from September 1946 to December 2006, running from the X-1 and the early X-airplanes through the X-15, X-29, X-31 and X-43 [Fisher 2007]. The series’ early articles stood on that documentary base. A source base that thins after 2000 is partly a change in what is published as a report, as the first article argued when it observed that later programmes generate press releases, fact sheets and conference papers rather than technical reports.
Research aircraft and their history
The designation range itself, from the X-1 to the newest numbers, together with the research aircraft outside it that flew alongside, the lifting bodies, and the inventories and histories that treat research aircraft as a class.
786 records. [Jenkins et al 2003] [Jenkins 2000] [Jenkins 2007] [Dana 1993] [Hunley 1999] [Reed et al 1997] [Gorn and De Chiara 2021] [Whiteside and Welstead 2026] [Silva et al 2026] [Truong et al 2025] [Bhamidipati et al 2024] [Borer et al 2024] [Borer 2024] [Arteaga et al 2024] [Bhamidipati et al 2024] [Nemie 2024] [Brandon 2024] [Cobleigh 2024] [Denham et al 2023] [Wallace et al 2023] [Arteaga et al 2023] [Durston 2023] [Durston 2023] [German et al 2023] [Miller et al 2023] [Grauer 2023] [Stalcup and Heersema 2023] [Maliska and Clarke 2023] [Schlickenmaier et al 2023] [Deere et al 2022] [Castner 2022] [Castner 2022] [Spivey et al 2021] [Spivey et al 2021] [Morgenstern and Rallabhandi 2021] [Pak 2020] [Schnulo and Hall 2020] [Van Dalsem 2019] [Howell and Shelton 2019] [Garcia et al 2019] [Dumbacher 2019] [Thomas et al 2018] [Neuhaus 2018] [Heeg et al 2018] [Hernandez Lugo et al 2018] [Thompson et al 2017] [Viken et al 2017] [Pak 2017] [Howell et al 2017] [Clarke et al 2017] [Barshi et al 2016] [Thompson 2016] [Ouellette 2015] [Bowers 2015] [Lokos et al 2015] [Sterk and McAtee 2015] [Ryan et al 2014] [Merlin 2014] [Hallion and Peebles 2014] [Orr et al 2014] [Baumann et al 2013] [Bosworth 2012] [Griffin et al 2011] [Ratnayake et al 2011] [Ratnayake et al 2011] [Howell 2011] [Grindle 2011] [Cosenito 2010] [Howell et al 2010] [Labbe et al 2009] [Risch et al 2009] [Risch et al 2009] [Risch et al 2009] [Taylor 2009] [Beaty et al 2008] [Cosentino 2008] [Cosentino 2008] [Extending the Frontiers of 2008] [Lux and Burkes 2008] [Regan 2008] [Baumann et al 2008] [Davis and White 2008] [Risch 2008] [Baumann 2007] [Redifer et al 2007] [Peebles 2007] [Peebles 2007] [Davis et al 2007] [Davis and Grindle 2007] [Cosentino 2007] [Banks and Fisher 2006] [Lux-Baumann et al 2006] [Davis and White 2006] [Jones 2006] [C. and White 2006] [Lux-Baumann and Burkes 2006] [Peebles 2006] [Hudson and Stephens 2006] [Grindle and Bahm 2006] [Baumann 2006] [Lux-Baumann and Burkes 2005] [Karlgaard et al 2005] [Marshall et al 2005] [Stein 2005] [Bahm et al 2005] [Voland et al 2005] [Vachon et al 2005] [Johnson and Robinson 2005] [McNeal 2004] [Karlgaard et al 2004] [Peterson 2004] [Dumbacher 2004] [Jacobson 2004] [Jacobson 2004] [Taylor 2004] [Mitchell 2004] [Corpening 2004] [Aggarwal 2003] [Kouba et al 2003] [Underwood et al 2003] [Hollis et al 2003] [Sexton 2003] [Moses 2003] [Moses 2003] [Saltzman et al 2002] [Darcy 2002] [Dunlap and Steinetz 2002] [Schwabacher et al 2002] [Hegab 2002] [Curry et al 2002] [Behr et al 2001] [Schweikhard et al 2001] [Cotting et al 2001] [Dunlap et al 2001] [Huebner et al 2001] [McClinton et al 2001] [Balakumar and Hamilton 2001] [Cotting and Burken 2001] [Dunlap et al 2001] [Childers et al 2001] [Ranier 2001] [Ko and Gong 2001] [Wacker et al 2001] [Berry et al 2001] [Anderson 2001] [Tartabini et al 2000] [McGhee 2000] [MacConochie 2000] [Pamadi et al 2000] [Engelund et al 2000] [Miller and Jenkins 2000] [Olney et al 2000] [Hidalgo 2000] [Darcy and Johnson 2000] [Machin 2000] [Littlefield and Melton 2000] [Jensen et al 2000] [Bedrossian et al 2000] [Manley et al 2000] [Huebner et al 2000] [Holland et al 2000] [Rausch et al 2000] [Buning et al 2000] [Moise et al 2000] [Smith and Ahmed 2000] [Support to X-33/Resusable Launch 2000] [Support to X-33/Reusable Launch 2000] [Simpson et al 2000] [Maisel et al 2000] [The NASA IVHM Technology 2000] [Stewart 2000] [Horvath et al 2000] [Munday et al 2000] [Gafka and Daugherty 2000] [X-38 Phase 3 Drops 2000] [Munday 2000] [McGhee 1999] [Scallion 1999] [Pamadi and Brauckmann 1999] [Tragesser and Barton 1999] [Darcy and Strangways 1999] [Rivers 1999] [Littlefield and Melton 1999] [Davidson et al 1999] [Engelund et al 1999] [Burken et al 1999] [Crowley 1999] [Simpson et al 1999] [Burleigh 1999] [Cotting and Burken 1999] [McCaleb and Holland 1999] [Horvath et al 1999] [Murphy et al 1999] [X-33, X-34, X-37 Press 1999] [Bedos and Anderson 1999] [Sawyer et al 1998] [Hanson et al 1998] [Darcy 1998] [Hamilton et al 1998] [Wagner et al 1998] [Cobleigh 1998] [Schweikhard et al 1998] [Dukeman and Gallaher 1998] [McClinton et al 1998] [Thompson et al 1998] [Barret 1998] [Komerath et al 1998] [Mackall et al 1998] [Shtessel et al 1998] [Mackall et al 1998] [Bouslog et al 1998] [Hall et al 1998] [Laue 1998] [Sharma 1998] [Vinson 1998] [Garbos and Mouyos 1998] [Berry et al 1998] [London and Lyles 1998] [Brauckmann 1998] [Sim 1997] [Rausch et al 1997] [Campbell et al 1997] [Navarro 1997] [Berry et al 1997] [Palmer et al 1997] [Freeman et al 1997] [Miura et al 1997] [Ruf et al 1996] [Wichman et al 1996] [Hyper-X Model Testing with 1996] [Carter and Nagy 1996] [Batterson and Morelli 1996] [Morelli 1996] [Burcham et al 1995] [Cruz and Ware 1995] [Morelli 1995] [Hogenson and Lu 1995] [Cook 1995] [Stortz and ODonoghue 1995] [Kempel et al 1994] [Regenie et al 1994] [Spearman and Torres 1994] [Williams et al 1994] [Palmer et al 1994] [Jackson et al 1994] [Weiss et al 1994] [VSTOL Systems Research Aircraft 1994] [X-31 Tailless Testing 1994] [Urnes et al 1993] [Kempel and Painter 1993] [Ware and Cruz 1993] [Morris 1993] [Kokolios 1993] [Klein and Noderer 1992] [Spearman and Torres 1992] [Ehernberger et al 1992] [Dicarlo et al 1992] [Cruz and Ware 1992] [Jackson and Cruz 1992] [Mackall et al 1992] [Jackson et al 1992] [Regenie et al 1992] [Sitz 1992] [Ware et al 1991] [Johnson 1991] [Jackson et al 1991] [Powell and Cruz 1991] [Rivers et al 1991] [Proceedings of the X-15 1991] [Hicks 1991] [Pahle et al 1991] [Stone and Piland 1991] [Donlan 1991] [Talay and Stone 1991] [Wierzbanowski and Armstrong 1991] [Williams 1991] [Hoey 1991] [Storms 1991] [Hallion 1991] [X-29 Research Aircraft 1991] [Gregorek and Reuss 1990] [Horvath et al 1990] [Micol 1990] [Del Frate et al 1990] [Delfrate et al 1990] [Maglieri et al 1990] [Cruz et al 1989] [Waggoner and Bates 1989] [Smith and Stonum 1989] [Hicks and Matheny 1989] [Freudinger 1989] [Earls and Sitz 1989] [Hook and Freeman 1989] [Hicks and Petersen 1989] [Ware 1989] [Zipf 1989] [Gilyard 1989] [Ware 1989] [Sims et al 1989] [Croom et al 1988] [Foster et al 1988] [Riddle et al 1988] [Trippensee and Lux 1988] [Dana 1987] [Hicks et al 1987] [Hicks et al 1987] [Mangalam et al 1987] [Schmidt 1987] [Trippensee and Lux 1987] [Gera 1986] [Whipple and Ricket 1986] [Sefic and Maxwell 1986] [Cunningham 1985] [Ishmael and Wierzbanowski 1985] [Sim and Curry 1984] [Cross and Watts 1984] [Curry and Sim 1984] [Erickson et al 1984] [Szalai 1984] [Ralston 1984] [Putnam 1984] [Putnam 1984] [Cross 1984] [Painter 1983] [Hall and Merrill 1983] [Gilyard and Edwards 1983] [Byrdsong and Brooks 1983] [Kempel 1982] [Queen and Cochrane 1982] [Wilson et al 1982] [Daforno 1982] [Frei 1982] [Harney 1981] [Kotsabasis 1981] [Gerdes 1981] [Lampkin 1980] [Dunn 1980] [Martin 1980] [Dugan et al 1980] [Byrdsong and Brooks 1980] [Bailey and Brownson 1979] [Byrdsong and Hallissy 1979] [McCracken 1979] [Sliwa 1979] [Grose 1979] [Stough and Patton 1979] [Dillon and Pittman 1978] [Dillon and Creel 1978] [Shovlin and Cochrane 1978] [Bode et al 1978] [Lawing 1978] [White and Condon 1978] [Cochrane and Boissevain 1978] [Bement 1978] [Jackson et al 1978] [Vahl and Edwards 1978] [Clark and Richie 1977] [Dillon and Pittman 1977] [Gingrich et al 1977] [Aiken et al 1977] [Combs 1977] [Combs 1977] [Dehoff et al 1977] [Johnson and Lawing 1977] [Houck et al 1977] [Sim 1976] [Edwards 1976] [Cook and Whittley 1976] [Combs 1976] [Petersen 1976] [Petersen 1976] [Condon and Letchworth 1976] [Small et al 1976] [Nebiker 1975] [Lawing 1975] [Cook and Whittley 1975] [Edwards and Deets 1975] [Bartlett 1975] [Bartlett and Sangiorgio 1975] [Kempel et al 1975] [Kirkham et al 1975] [Penland 1975] [Condon 1975] [Garcia 1975] [Manke and Love 1975] [Lebacqz 1974] [Vidal 1974] [Boyden 1974] [Bartlett and Harris 1974] [Kempel and Manke 1974] [Painter and Sitterle 1974] [Layton 1974] [Oblique Wing Remotely Piloted 1974] [Quigley and Holzhauser 1974] [Re 1974] [Linden and Hellyar 1974] [X-24C research vehicle 1974] [Sim 1973] [Tang and Pearson 1973] [Sim 1973] [Whittley 1973] [Soule 1973] [Bartlett et al 1973] [Ferris 1973] [Schuler et al 1972] [Strutz 1972] [Jordan 1972] [Linden 1972] [Schmidt and Linden 1972] [Schmidt and Linden 1972] [Larson 1972] [Blair 1972] [Ashleman and Kavdahl 1972] [V/STOL tilt rotor aircraft 1972] [Bartlett and Re 1972] [Keener and Brownson 1972] [Harris 1972] [Jernell 1971] [Kempel 1971] [Kempel and Thompson 1971] [Tang and Pearson 1971] [Gibson and Goetz 1971] [Pyle 1971] [Cochrane and Graham 1971] [Jorgensen et al 1971] [Tang 1971] [Thompson 1970] [Manke et al 1970] [McTigue 1970] [Tang 1970] [Collins et al 1970] [Holmes 1970] [Thompson 1970] [Naeseth 1970] [Pyle and Ash 1970] [Dana and Gentry 1970] [Kempel et al 1970] [Layton 1970] [Chin 1970] [Kemper and Renselaer 1969] [Graves 1969] [Dana et al 1969] [De Angelis and Tang 1969] [Fisher 1969] [Quinn and Olinger 1969] [Falarski and Mort 1969] [Kock and Painter 1969] [Winston 1969] [The X-15, a rocket-assisted 1969] [Bryson et al 1968] [Kock and Painter 1968] [Miele 1968] [Andrews and Rogers 1968] [Jenkins et al 1968] [Huang and Miele 1967] [Lytton 1967] [Jarvis 1967] [Bugg and Sleeman 1967] [M2-F2 Lifting Body Accident 1967] [Wilson 1967] [Study of the influence 1967] [Montoya and Palitz 1967] [Stevens et al 1966] [Patterson 1966] [Braslow 1966] [Love and Young 1966] [Wilson 1966] [First Glide Flight of 1966] [Campbell 1966] [Gamse and Mort 1966] [Lusty 1966] [Gentry et al 1966] [Palitz 1966] [Jarvis 1966] [Brunner et al 1966] [Garringer and Saltzman 1966] [Holleman 1966] [Love and Young 1966] [Taylor et al 1965] [Banner and Kuhl 1965] [McKay and Noll 1965] [Watts et al 1965] [Holleman 1965] [Adkins and Armstrong 1965] [Smith 1965] [Lewis and McLeod 1965] [Rolls 1965] [Gossett and Wolowicz 1965] [Progress of the X-15 1965] [Jalink 1965] [Burke and Basso 1965] [Love and Fischel 1965] [Bikle and McCollom 1965] [Yancey 1964] [Banner et al 1964] [Anderson et al 1963] [Walker and Weil 1963] [X-15, Research at the 1963] [Keener and Pembo 1962] [Fetterman et al 1962] [Kordes and McKay 1962] [Banner et al 1962] [Matranga et al 1962] [Weil 1962] [Walker and Wolowicz 1962] [Walker 1961] [Smith 1961] [McKay and Scott 1961] [Matranga 1961] [Beeler 1961] [Reed and Watts 1961] [Beeler and Toll 1961] [Day 1961] [Young 1961] [Bland and Young 1961] [Wiswell et al 1961] [Grantham and Scher 1960] [Osborne and Stafford 1960] [Reller and Seegmiller 1960] [Hassell 1960] [Hassell and Hewes 1960] [Shanks and Smith 1960] [Burbank and Hodge 1960] [Fetterman and Penland 1960] [Hewes and Hassell 1960] [Walker and Wolowicz 1960] [Fischel 1960] [Day and Reisert 1959] [Gibson and Mixson 1959] [Finch and Matranga 1959] [Paulson and Hassell 1959] [Latham and Tunnell 1959] [Dunning 1959] [Smith 1959] [Rowen 1958] [Penland and Fetterman 1958] [Smith 1958] [Smith 1958] [Hewes et al 1958] [Wong et al 1958] [Research-Airplane-Committee Report on Conference 1958] [Feller and Burbank 1958] [Greene 1958] [Bowman 1957] [Moul 1957] [Conference on the progress 1956] [Research-Airplane-Committee Report on Conference 1956] [Bowman 1955] [Reed 1955] [Bowman 1955] [Fischel and Nugent 1953] [Knapp and Johnson 1953] [Childs 1953] [Saltzman 1953] [Knapp and Jordan 1953] [Knapp et al 1953] [Rogers 1953] [Day 1953] [Finch and Briggs 1953] [Baker 1953] [Knapp and Jordan 1953] [Runckel and Henderson 1952] [Martin and Reed 1952] [Day and Stillwell 1952] [Stillwell and Wilmerding 1951] [Ramsen et al 1951] [Polhamus 1950] [Drake 1950] [Pendley 1947] [Feigenbaum 1945] [Raab 2026] [Alexander and Alieh 2026] [Suppes and Suppes 2026] [Yin et al 2024] [Miller 2024] [Bernardi and Merrett 2024] [Deng et al 2024] [Borer et al 2024] [Arteaga et al 2024] [Sparkes 2024] [Wilhite et al 2024] [Direct numerical simulations of 2023] [P.V and Laxman 2023] [Deora et al 2023] [Vishesh and Sivasubramanian 2023] [Soğukpinar and Cag 2022] [Gorn and De Chiara 2021] [Heberling 2020] [Hiruma et al 2020] [Grauer and Boucher 2020] [Borer et al 2019] [Sobolev 2018] [Viladegut 2018] [Beh et al 2018] [Clarke et al 2018] [Grauer and Boucher 2017] [Wartemann et al 2017] [Ling 2017] [Rocket-Powered Aircraft 2017] [Experimental aircraft wing propelled 2016] [Reimann 2016] [Denham and Owens 2016] [Hussein and Chudoba 2016] [Adamczak and Bolender 2015] [Khurana and Suzuki 2014] [Kuehme et al 2014] [Ghoreyshi et al 2014] [Hellman et al 2013] [Khurana and Suzuki 2013] [Khurana et al 2012] [Hoe et al 2012] [van Pelt 2012] [van Pelt 2012] [Nakatani et al 2011] [Letchworth 2011] [Rufolo et al 2008] [Murakami et al 2008] [Ishikawa et al 2008] [Peebles 2008] [Hank et al 2008] [Ishikawa et al 2007] [Murakami et al 2007] [Ahad and Graham 2007] [Bidwell 2007] [van Oort et al 2007] [Minami and Tsukamoto 2006] [Kwak et al 2006] [Temple 2006] [Marshall et al 2005] [Morelli et al 2005] [Boeing to use X-43A 2005] [Brinker and Barker 2005] [Ferlemann 2005] [Ferlemann et al 2005] [Brinker 2004] [Davidson 2004] [Seanor et al 2004] [Fuhrmann 2003] [Reichenbach 2003] [Wise 2003] [Makino and Noguchi 2003] [Sakata 2002] [Engelund 2001] [Blades and Redgrave 2000] [Dragone 2000] [Mikula et al 2000] [Crouch 1999] [Whitmore and Moes 1999] [Sawyer et al 1999] [Saltzman et al 1999] [Burkhardt et al 1999] [D’Angelo et al 1999] [Barret 1999] [Hollis et al 1999] [Jackson and Rivers 1998] [Katz et al 1998] [McClinton et al 1998] [Reaser 1997] [Whitford and Whitford 1997] [Nelson et al 1997] [Page and Anderson 1996] [Lozino-Lozinsky et al 1996] [Rogers and Dragone 1996] [Schmidt and Mann 1996] [Cook 1996] [Sager 1995] [Baumgartner and Elvin 1995] [Bowcutt and Haney 1995] [Rivers et al 1994] [Slender Lifting Body Axial 1994] [Canter and Groves 1994] [Soistmann and Spain 1993] [Aerothermodynamic design of a 1993] [La et al 1993] [Kaletka and Fu 1993] [Jackson et al 1993] [Stadler 1993] [Grantz et al 1993] [Hawkins and Dilley 1992] [Del Frate and Saltzman 1992] [Yip et al 1992] [Foch 1992] [Espinosa and Groepler 1992] [Smith and Pellicano 1992] [Knox 1992] [Wulff and Zoellner 1991] [Yamato et al 1991] [Huber et al 1991] [Ray et al 1990] [Fisher et al 1990] [Del Frate and Zuniga 1990] [Erwin 1990] [Immenschuh 1990] [Murray 1990] [Thomason 1990] [The Bell X-22A V/STOL 1990] [The Canadair CL-84 experimental 1990] [Borst 1990] [Nichols 1990] [Redeker and Voersmann 1988] [Ray et al 1988] [Yamato et al 1988] [Kempel et al 1988] [Raney 1987] [Hicks et al 1987] [Hicks and Matheny 1987] [Moralez et al 1987] [Schroeder 1987] [Burcham and Ray 1987] [Chin et al 1987] [Testing of Advanced Carbon 1986] [Deets and Brown 1986] [Weeks 1986] [Tobiason and McShea 1986] [Sefic and Cutler 1986] [Spearman 1985] [Sano et al 1984] [Wolkovitch 1984] [Painter and Erickson 1984] [Jackson and Coyle 1983] [Griffin and Jonas 1983] [Spacht 1983] [Cochrane et al 1982] [Curry and Sim 1982] [Edwards 1981] [Maisel and Harris 1981] [Riddle et al 1981] [Cochrane et al 1981] [Burks 1981] [Baer-Riedhart 1981] [Haberland 1980] [Hoyt et al 1980] [Iliff 1980] [Rasmussen 1979] [Penland et al 1978] [Smith 1978] [Bowman et al 1978] [Taylor and Jackson 1978] [Jackson and Taylor 1978] [Draper et al 1977] [Armstrong 1977] [Lancaster 1977] [Richardson 1976] [Weidner et al 1976] [Ward and Bennett 1974] [Van Camp and Williams 1974] [Kirkham et al 1974] [Deckert and Holzhauser 1973] [Adams et al 1973] [Chernyi and Gonor 1973] [Gentry 1972] [Spitzer et al 1972] [Kempel 1971] [Rhodes 1970] [Bell Aerospace Co Buffalo Ny 1970] [Kotfilia and Painter 1969] [McTigue and Layton 1969] [Lockheed-Georgia Co Marietta 1969] [Elliott 1968] [McTigue and Ryan 1968] [Gentry 1968] [Anderson et al 1967] [Love and Young 1967] [Covington 1966] [Thompson 1966] [Vetter 1966] [Nicholson and lowry 1966] [Hirsh 1965] [Borst 1965] [Sanderson 1965] [Brant and Hage 1964] [Larson and Montoya 1964] [Hunting H.126 Jet-Flap Research 1963] [Row and Fischel 1963] [Rogers 1963] [Marchese 1963] [British Research Aircraft 1962] [Bouman 1962] [Cicala and Miele 1956] [Miele 1955] [Reinhardt 1948] [Africano 1947] [Cole 1946] [Space Rocket Aircraft with 1936] [Viladegut Farran] [Chacon et al]
Flight research and flight test as a method
How flight research and flight testing are planned, instrumented, flown and made safe, for aircraft, missiles, launch vehicles and entry experiments, from the early research-airplane programmes to the subscale and electric demonstrators of the 2020s.
1,468 records. [Thompson et al 2000] [Gorn 2001] [Hirshorn et al 2024] [Hirshorn and Kemmerly 2018] [Cumming et al 2017] [Simmons 2026] [Culbertson 2026] [Nesbitt et al 2025] [Stephenson et al 2025] [Rinehart et al 2025] [Ratvasky 2024] [McMurtry and Ellis 2024] [Nelson et al 2024] [Kannan et al 2024] [Zahn et al 2024] [Deshmukh et al 2024] [Blette et al 2024] [Thomas et al 2024] [Ouellette et al 2023] [Hughes et al 2023] [Benson et al 2023] [Miller 2023] [Henderson et al 2022] [Young 2022] [Abushmeis et al 2021] [Czech et al 2021] [Lynde et al 2021] [Klun et al 2020] [Waggoner et al 2020] [Foster et al 2020] [Ament et al 2019] [Tynis et al 2019] [Kufeld et al 2019] [Kufeld et al 2019] [Navarro 2019] [Hashii and Thompson 2018] [Samuel et al 2018] [Chan 2018] [Cumming and Kim 2018] [Waldersen 2018] [Arteaga et al 2018] [Johnson et al 2017] [Neal and Flick 2017] [Hang 2017] [Cumming et al 2016] [Teets 2016] [Schwing 2016] [Javorsek et al 2016] [Berry et al 2016] [White and Hyatt 2016] [Bose et al 2016] [Schuster et al 2016] [Miller 2015] [Hang 2015] [Jacobson 2015] [Gorton 2015] [McCauley et al 2015] [Hang 2015] [Gelzer and Peebles 2015] [Cliatt et al 2014] [Cumming et al 2014] [Miller 2014] [Hanson 2014] [Rothhaar et al 2014] [Stoliker 2014] [Miller et al 2014] [Cumming et al 2013] [Pavlock 2013] [St. John and Frederick 2013] [Pak 2013] [Morelli et al 2013] [Brown 2013] [Brown and Schaefer 2013] [Asher et al 2013] [Carter et al 2013] [Hines 2012] [Martinez 2012] [Banks 2012] [Hanson 2012] [Anderson et al 2012] [Costa and Arteaga 2011] [Kostyk 2011] [Banks 2011] [Pavlock et al 2011] [Frederick and Ratnayake 2011] [Bauer et al 2011] [Bowers et al 2011] [Glaser and Strovers 2011] [Kowal 2011] [Berry et al 2011] [Banks et al 2011] [Humphreys et al 2010] [Ratnayake 2010] [Buehrle et al 2010] [Buehrle et al 2010] [Buehrle et al 2010] [Holguin and Kostyk 2010] [Chen and Berry 2010] [Tow 2010] [Pestana 2010] [Davis 2010] [Danehy et al 2010] [Morelli and Smith 2010] [Holguin and Kostyk 2010] [Moua 2010] [Idicula et al 2009] [Huebner et al 2009] [Huebner et al 2009] [Flynn et al 2009] [Ratnayake 2009] [Banks 2009] [Flynn et al 2009] [Larson et al 2009] [Navarro 2009] [Bauer 2009] [Cosentino 2009] [Davis and Robinson 2008] [Davis 2008] [Brandon et al 2008] [Bowers et al 2008] [Davis 2008] [Franz 2008] [Kharisov et al 2008] [Bauer 2008] [Moua et al 2008] [Kukreja 2008] [DelFrate 2008] [Kostyk 2008] [Lewis 2007] [Lux et al 2007] [Kostyk 2007] [Meyer 2007] [Ratnayake 2007] [Kukreja 2007] [Brenner 2007] [Miller 2007] [Fisher 2007] [Fisher and Parcel 2007] [Chen et al 2007] [Bauer 2007] [Bomben et al 2006] [Owens et al 2006] [Ennix-Sandhu 2006] [Morehouse 2006] [van der Velde 2005] [Crounse 2005] [Harney 2005] [Kirsten 2005] [Clarke et al 2005] [Stoliker 2005] [Jentink and Bogue 2005] [Hansen et al 2005] [Mizukami 2004] [Petersen et al 2004] [Jordan et al 2004] [Bohn-Meyer et al 2004] [Williams-Hayes 2004] [Gorn 2003] [Raney and Waszak 2003] [Davidson et al 2003] [Stoliker and Carter 2003] [Palumbo et al 2003] [Hanson et al 2002] [Moes and Iliff 2002] [Chung and Hutchinson 2001] [Cicolani et al 2001] [Corda et al 2001] [Teets and Harvey 2000] [Bui et al 2000] [Anderson 2000] [Curry and Batterson 2000] [Mettler et al 2000] [Morelli 2000] [Moes et al 2000] [Miller 2000] [Corda et al 2000] [Greer et al 1999] [Braslow 1999] [Klein and Murphy 1999] [Greer et al 1999] [Exploring Flight Research with 1999] [Fisher 1999] [London and Sumrall 1999] [Brown and Smith 1999] [Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development 1999] [Churchward et al 1998] [Moore et al 1998] [McCoy 1998] [Corda et al 1998] [Miller et al 1998] [Rasky et al 1998] [Johnson and Ess 1997] [Morelli and Klein 1997] [Burcham et al 1997] [Whitmore et al 1997] [Richards 1997] [Reynolds 1997] [Lind et al 1997] [Carter 1997] [Burcham et al 1997] [Powers 1997] [Richwine 1996] [Burken et al 1996] [Wallace 1996] [Mehta 1995] [Powers 1995] [Maine et al 1995] [Richwine and Del Frate 1995] [Anderson 1995] [Mehta 1995] [Saltzman and Ayers 1995] [Kehoe and Freudinger 1994] [Borek and Pool 1994] [Maine et al 1994] [Sim et al 1994] [Richwine and Delfrate 1994] [Burcham et al 1994] [Mehta and Kutler 1994] [Hodges and Walker 1994] [Shafer 1994] [Whitmore and Moes 1994] [Russo et al 1994] [Ham et al 1993] [Schilling and Mackall 1993] [Hicks 1993] [Budd et al 1993] [Burcham et al 1993] [Bogue 1993] [Iliff and Shafer 1993] [Sim et al 1993] [Hardin et al 1993] [American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1992] [Meyer et al 1992] [Simpson and Tran 1992] [Flight Testing 1992] [Meineke and Urry 1992] [Meyer 1992] [Bowles 1992] [Ray et al 1992] [Deangelis 1991] [Simpson and Tran 1991] [Bever 1991] [Bever 1991] [Shafer 1991] [Lewis 1991] [Cohen and Le 1991] [Oneill-Rood and Glover 1990] [Freudinger and Kehoe 1990] [Yip et al 1990] [Siddiqi and Kwa 1990] [Bach and McNally 1989] [Duke et al 1989] [Richwine et al 1989] [Bonnema and Lokos 1989] [Batterson and Klein 1989] [Gnoffo 1989] [Putnam and Ayers 1989] [Fisher and Meyer 1989] [Rediess 1989] [Gnoffo 1989] [Smith et al 1989] [Simpson et al 1989] [Menon and Walker 1988] [Schuster and Lokos 1988] [Jenks and Haslim 1988] [Zerweckh et al 1988] [Yechout 1988] [Diamond 1988] [Hammons 1988] [Duke et al 1988] [Few 1987] [Kehoe 1987] [Sefic and Maxwell 1987] [Weilmuenster and Hamilton 1986] [Duke et al 1986] [Praharaj et al 1986] [Praharaj et al 1986] [Praharaj et al 1986] [Duke et al 1986] [White et al 1985] [Wentz et al 1985] [Phatak and Lee 1985] [Layton 1984] [Bartlett et al 1984] [Batterson and Klein 1984] [Duke and Jones 1984] [Yechout and Braman 1984] [Sandlin 1984] [Schofield 1984] [Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development 1984] [Hallion 1984] [Ward and Miley 1984] [Meyer and Schneider 1984] [Deam 1984] [Bever 1984] [Butcher and McKay 1984] [Evans and Schilling 1984] [Watson and Hardy 1983] [Bull and Bridges 1983] [Srijayantha 1983] [Walker and Gupta 1983] [Painter 1983] [Harney et al 1983] [Evans and Schilling 1983] [Duke and Lux 1983] [Rezek 1983] [Iliff and Maine 1983] [Roncoli 1982] [Murman 1982] [Agar 1982] [Clarke et al 1982] [Scallion 1982] [Culp and Cooke 1982] [Batson et al 1981] [Carter and Sims 1981] [Chambers and Iliff 1981] [Thompson and Horton 1981] [Bull and Bridges 1981] [Deal et al 1981] [Freeman and Spencer 1980] [Guiot and Wunnenberg 1980] [Patton 1980] [Cooke 1980] [Wilner 1979] [Suit and Cannaday 1979] [Redd et al 1979] [Stone and Koch 1979] [Iliff et al 1979] [Patton et al 1979] [Iliff et al 1978] [Fields 1978] [Liff 1978] [Hall and Vincent 1978] [Hoffmann et al 1978] [North 1978] [Tomaine et al 1978] [Domino et al 1977] [Jacobsen and Barber 1977] [Snyder and Schoultz 1976] [Cook and Hickey 1976] [Johnson and Painter 1976] [Lenz and McKeever 1976] [Sanderson 1975] [Carnahan et al 1975] [Kirsten and Ash 1974] [Reeder 1974] [Deets and Edwards 1974] [Pool and Bosman 1974] [Rediess 1974] [Macwilkinson et al 1974] [Macwilkinson et al 1974] [Suit and Williams 1974] [Taillon 1974] [Molusis and Briczinski 1974] [Chapman and Kirk 1974] [Parameter estimation techniques and 1974] [Tymczyszyn and Barber 1974] [Marshall and Schweikhard 1973] [Mehra et al 1972] [Smetana et al 1972] [Painter and Sitterle 1972] [Parrish and Steinmetz 1972] [Steinmetz et al 1972] [Gee and Wolf 1972] [Mosley 1972] [Dayman 1971] [Wykes and Lawrence 1971] [Miller and Oncley 1971] [Flight Test Results Pertaining 1970] [Hypersonic Research Facilities Study 1970] [Chambers and Grafton 1968] [Austin et al 1967] [Barker et al 1967] [Reeder 1967] [Brigden and Roman 1966] [Saturn in-flight experimental payload 1966] [Saturn in-flight experimental payload 1966] [Saturn in-flight experimental payload 1966] [Cook and Hickey 1965] [Zuccaro 1965] [Saturn in-flight experimental payload 1965] [Levy and McDevitt 1964] [Sanderson 1964] [Drinkwater et al 1964] [NASA Scout ST-1 Flight-Test 1962] [Dayman 1962] [Drake 1957] [Nissen et al 1948] [Cleary and Gray 1948] [Cleary and Gray 1947] [Seacord and Teitelbaum 1947] [Stone 1946] [Kauffman 1945] [Hamilton 1945] [Delany and Kauffman 1945] [Shortal and Osterbout 1941] [Ryals et al 2026] [Wade et al 2026] [Balcan et al 2026] [Kunwar et al 2026] [Design validation and verification 2026] [Sarker et al 2026] [Duran 2026] [Comer et al 2026] [Abdulrahim 2026] [Harper et al 2026] [Eisenhut and Strohmayer 2026] [Zhou et al 2026] [Voss et al 2026] [Comer et al 2026] [Daud Filho et al 2026] [Ward et al 2026] [Filippoli et al 2026] [González Mendoza 2026] [Cheung et al 2026] [Klingenberg et al 2026] [Ghanchi and Gururajan 2026] [Guelhan et al 2026] [Thato Elijah and Rui Vasconcellos 2026] [Huber and Kutty 2026] [González Mendoza 2026] [Filippoli et al 2026] [Elena 2026] [Dungan et al 2026] [Simmons and Ackerman 2026] [Alexander et al 2026] [Butler et al 2026] [Bauer 2026] [Tatsuta et al 2025] [Eglin et al 2025] [Prasinos et al 2025] [Padua and Preisighe Viana 2025] [Blakely and Nielsen 2025] [Abou-Kebeh et al 2025] [Tardif and Myrand-Lapierre 2025] [Nicola et al 2025] [Ward et al 2025] [Szymanski et al 2025] [Dantsker et al 2025] [Wang et al 2025] [Ide and Landman 2025] [Simmons et al 2025] [Jones and Laurence 2025] [Borg et al 2025] [Borg et al 2025] [Gäßler and Robens 2025] [Bai 2025] [Corda 2025] [Shen and Chen 2025] [Hosseini et al 2025] [Bai and Chen 2025] [Wu and Li 2025] [Zander 2025] [Reimer et al 2025] [Du et al 2025] [Carpenter et al 2025] [Che 2025] [Jayanti et al 2025] [Bekar et al 2025] [Monteil 2024] [Abou-Kebeh LLano et al 2024] [Pérez Rus and Le Gal 2024] [Kodera et al 2024] [Benyamen et al 2024] [Loughran et al 2024] [Comer et al 2024] [White et al 2024] [Dantsker 2024] [Melander and Candler 2024] [Andreeva-Mori et al 2024] [Jia and Wang 2024] [Pusztai et al 2024] [Lee et al 2024] [Chinvorarat et al 2024] [Stephenson 2024] [West and Bynum 2024] [Jones et al 2024] [Gülhan et al 2024] [Dantsker 2024] [Biggi et al 2024] [Su 2024] [Luo et al 2024] [Wang 2024] [Hou and Song 2024] [Li 2024] [Genito et al 2024] [Roeser and Mönnich 2024] [Li et al 2024] [Patel et al 2023] [Süelözgen 2023] [Portoni and Dufrene 2023] [Bennett and Lawson 2023] [Rucci et al 2023] [Tao et al 2023] [Reimer et al 2023] [Taranto and Abdulrahim 2023] [Deepa and Gupta 2023] [Schrader 2023] [Yue et al 2023] [Raol and Singh 2023] [Turan and Ünsal 2023] [Gupta 2023] [Kimura et al 2023] [Dantsker et al 2023] [Dias 2023] [Simmons et al 2023] [Laurence 2023] [Haus 2023] [Johnston and Candler 2023] [Tani et al 2023] [Takahashi et al 2023] [Liu et al 2023] [Balachandran et al 2023] [Gülhan et al 2023] [Cacciatore et al 2023] [Gahan et al 2023] [Palomino 2022] [Machnik et al 2022] [Quinn 2022] [Li et al 2022] [Véras et al 2022] [Wang et al 2022] [Heaney et al 2022] [Rahmani et al 2022] [Chowdhury and Keshmiri 2022] [Hua 2022] [Zhixin 2022] [Blevins et al 2022] [Jusko et al 2022] [Dantsker et al 2022] [Hypersonic Air-Breathing Flight Testing 2022] [Hastedt et al 2022] [Zhixin 2022] [Thomas et al 2022] [Research and Analysis on 2022] [Nepomuceno et al 2022] [Hamel et al 2022] [Jeong and Bae 2022] [Raffel et al 2022] [Sobron et al 2021] [Aircraft and Flight Test 2021] [Costello et al 2021] [Yang 2021] [Lopez et al 2021] [Liu and Hui 2021] [Morelli 2021] [Coskun and Genc 2021] [Wang et al 2021] [Arif and Sasongko 2021] [Flight Test Planning 2021] [McKinnis et al 2021] [Gao et al 2021] [Sóbester 2021] [Wei 2021] [Sobrón Rueda 2021] [Asselin 2021] [Morelli 2021] [Sijia et al 2021] [Wardana et al 2021] [Morelli 2021] [Recommended Practice When Flight 2021] [Wu and Liu 2021] [UAV Flight Testing 2021] [Wustenhagen et al 2021] [Lonzaga 2021] [Förder and Steiner 2020] [Jacob da Motta 2020] [Arévalo Nogales 2020] [Larsson et al 2020] [Berrigan et al 2020] [McQuellin et al 2020] [Ecodemonstrator Flight Test Program 2020] [Yasue 2020] [Sampson 2020] [Courtin et al 2020] [Xiao et al 2020] [Try et al 2020] [Travascio et al 2020] [Sung et al 2020] [Christoffel et al 2020] [Kraft 2020] [Dinsenmeyer et al 2019] [Öhrle et al 2019] [Thakur et al 2019] [Hudson et al 2019] [Enciu 2019] [Bumbaugh et al 2019] [Wong et al 2019] [Larsson 2019] [Dantsker and Mancuso 2019] [Wei et al 2019] [Berridge et al 2019] [Morawski et al 2019] [Lu et al 2019] [Xu et al 2019] [Minnema et al 2019] [Abdulrahim 2019] [Martínez Morán 2018] [Hummer et al 2018] [Gross and Fasel 2018] [Fedele and Mungiguerra 2018] [Waggoner et al 2018] [Iovnovich et al 2018] [Carpenter et al 2018] [Feil et al 2018] [Samuel et al 2018] [ECO Demonstrator Begins Flight 2018] [Ursu et al 2018] [McAteer et al 2018] [Berridge et al 2018] [Koeniguer and Spear 2018] [Crowder 2018] [Kramer et al 2018] [Rafi et al 2018] [Sobron 2018] [Karlgaard et al 2018] [Olson 2018] [Banu et al 2017] [Berra et al 2017] [Grant et al 2017] [Flight Test 2017] [Chao et al 2017] [Yavuztürk et al 2017] [Grauer et al 2017] [Lum et al 2017] [Geister et al 2017] [Bageshwar 2017] [Lu et al 2017] [Demidovich 2017] [Sorensen and Johansen 2017] [Rocchio et al 2017] [Caetano et al 2017] [Guo et al 2017] [Miller et al 2017] [McGovern 2017] [Michalowski and Varano 2017] [Kish et al 2017] [Neumannn et al 2016] [Collins 2016] [Bronz and Hattenberger 2016] [Aircraft and Rotorcraft System 2016] [Harris et al 2016] [Larsson and Enqvist 2016] [Lapalme et al 2016] [Klein et al 2016] [Vengate et al 2016] [Cooke and Engle 2016] [Flight Test Data Analysis 2016] [Whalley et al 2016] [Hall 2016] [Pommier-Budinger et al 2016] [Liu et al 2016] [Ricciardi and Minwalla 2016] [Lee and Han 2016] [Spiegel et al 2016] [Lu et al 2016] [Stewart 2016] [Peterson et al 2016] [Norambuena et al 2016] [Davies 2015] [Hernanz et al 2015] [Spravka and Jorris 2015] [Spravka and Jorris 2015] [Kim et al 2015] [Klyde et al 2015] [Olson 2015] [Fredericks 2015] [Kurtz et al 2015] [Jann and Yakimenko 2015] [Martinez Schramm et al 2015] [Jackson et al 2015] [Wartmann 2015] [Gorton 2015] [Dianics et al 2015] [Devalla et al 2015] [Lu et al 2015] [Bunge et al 2015] [Giersch et al 2015] [Simsek and Tekinalp 2015] [Gilbert 2015] [Böhrk 2015] [Montel and Thielecke 2015] [Madhusudana Rao et al 2014] [Sakraker and Chazot 2014] [Van Bavel 2014] [Rabourdin et al 2014] [Mallozzi et al 2014] [Starkey et al 2014] [Berton et al 2014] [Helffer et al 2014] [Nusrath et al 2014] [Gratton 2014] [Chase and McDonald 2014] [Ouellette et al 2014] [DiOttavio et al 2014] [Rudnik and Schwetzler 2014] [Sabatini 2014] [Jorris 2014] [Takagi et al 2014] [Hellman 2014] [Hamel 2013] [Lin and Jan 2013] [Eger et al 2013] [Kang et al 2013] [Mason 2013] [Rew et al 2013] [Jiang and Voyles 2013] [Stansbury et al 2013] [Kumar et al 2013] [Jones et al 2013] [Ragheb et al 2013] [Dorobantu et al 2013] [Dianics et al 2013] [Brown and Boyce 2012] [Taylor 2012] [Creagh et al 2012] [Woolf 2012] [Chen and Shin 2012] [Starkey et al 2012] [Woolf 2012] [Taguchi et al 2012] [Guelhan et al 2012] [Schneider et al 2012] [Londono and Leonhardt 2012] [Brown et al 2012] [Danowsky et al 2012] [Cox et al 2012] [Jouannet et al 2012] [Bachelder et al 2011] [Falissard et al 2011] [Zhang et al 2011] [Bartolome Calvo and Eggers 2011] [Aarons et al 2011] [Mizobata et al 2011] [Smayda and Goyne 2011] [Khoshlahjeh et al 2011] [Morelli 2011] [Gregory et al 2011] [Taylor and Ratnayake 2011] [Keye 2011] [From Concepts To A 2011] [McVeigh et al 2011] [Kimmel et al 2011] [Smith et al 2011] [Almeida 2011] [Brown et al 2011] [Kumar and Ghosh 2011] [Tirtey et al 2011] [Jorris et al 2011] [A Typical Avionics Integration 2010] [Owen et al 2010] [Communications Flight Test 2010] [Ulbrich 2010] [Choi et al 2010] [Saric 2010] [Eaton and Woolf 2010] [Gregory et al 2010] [Roth et al 2010] [Richards et al 2010] [Lykins and Keshmiri 2010] [Sahoo and Peetala 2010] [Tirtey et al 2009] [Huynh and Kriz 2009] [Neuhart et al 2009] [Jann and Greiner-Perth 2009] [Chowdhary and Johnson 2009] [Cox et al 2009] [Morelli 2009] [Tirtey and Boyce 2009] [Dolvin 2009] [Tom et al 2009] [Donelli et al 2009] [De Jesus Mota and Botez 2009] [Roth 2009] [Leon et al 2009] [Murch et al 2009] [Brown 2009] [Murch 2008] [Gray 2008] [Blair et al 2008] [Segall 2008] [Longo 2008] [Pace et al 2008] [Aircraft and Rotorcraft System 2008] [Tucker et al 2008] [Rhodes et al 2008] [Neely and Tjong 2008] [Schouten and Saric 2008] [Kang et al 2008] [MacDonald and Shepherd 2008] [Deepak et al 2008] [Morelli 2008] [Flight Test Maneuvers and 2008] [Atkins 2008] [Swassing 2008] [Youngshin Kang et al 2008] [Cenko et al 2008] [McGinley 2008] [Dolvin 2008] [Gallagher and Wei 2008] [Iscold 2008] [Jordan and Bailey 2008] [Cunningham et al 2008] [Howe et al 2008] [Hurst and Collins 2008] [Moua et al 2008] [Kukreja 2008] [Weihs et al 2008] [Chowdhary and Johnson 2008] [Minor 2008] [Soares 2007] [Chalk 2007] [Simpson et al 2007] [Weltz et al 2007] [Bridges 2007] [Hiliuta and Botez 2007] [Fuel cell demonstrator aeroplane 2007] [Alich and Castillo 2007] [Lightweight low-cost flight test 2007] [Soares 2007] [Seybold et al 2007] [Goodman and Ireland 2007] [Umeda et al 2007] [Brad Seanor 2006] [Eggers and Barth 2006] [Gaitonde et al 2006] [Karl et al 2006] [Jategaonkar et al 2006] [Smart et al 2006] [Malaek et al 2006] [Johnson and Sorenson 2006] [Nadeau Beaulieu et al 2006] [Sarigul-Klijn and Huber 2006] [Sunami et al 2006] [Hiliuta and Botez 2006] [Deepak et al 2006] [Seren et al 2006] [Turner et al 2006] [Dadd et al 2006] [Goyne et al 2006] [Eggers et al 2006] [Goodman and Ireland 2006] [Neely and Tracy 2006] [Neumann 2005] [Brajou and Ricco 2005] [Biswas et al 2005] [Whalen and Bragg 2005] [Blackstock and Theobalds 2005] [Jategaonkar et al 2005] [Hutto et al 2005] [Bohn-Meyer et al 2005] [Dawson and Maxwell 2005] [Patel and Black 2005] [The Analyses of Dynamic 2005] [Eggers et al 2005] [Inger 2005] [Ueno et al 2004] [Ochi 2004] [Gardner et al 2004] [Bachelder et al 2004] [Sanders and Townsend 2004] [Adelgren et al 2004] [Minor et al 2004] [Veselenak and Beutelman 2004] [Hansen et al 2004] [Allee and Knoepfel 2004] [Lan et al 2004] [Baker et al 2004] [Iqbal 2003] [Campbell and Kresge 2003] [Fujii et al 2003] [Dynamic Lateral-Directional Stability Theory 2003] [Dynamic Longitudinal Stability Flight 2003] [Energy Approach To Performance 2003] [Reinert and Adams 2003] [Hanke 2003] [Klyde et al 2003] [Lind 2003] [Introduction to Stability and 2003] [Lateral-Directional Stability Theory and 2003] [Level Flight Performance Flight 2003] [Longitudinal Control And Trim 2003] [Methods for Reducing Data 2003] [Paris and Bonner 2003] [Tsukamoto et al 2003] [Static Longitudinal Stability Flight 2003] [Hur and Valasek 2003] [Boyce et al 2003] [Cain and Walton 2003] [Gerner 2003] [Chopra and Datta 2003] [Bachelder and Klyde 2003] [Rogers 2002] [Hall 2002] [Strecker and Arnold 2002] [Smith et al 2002] [Smith et al 2002] [Wang et al 2002] [Conway 2002] [Arterburn et al 2002] [Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards Afb Ca 2002] [Burnett 2002] [Ray et al 2002] [Mori et al 2002] [Vos et al 2002] [Palumbo et al 2002] [Ghosh and Raisinghani 2002] [Lawrence and Mills 2002] [Titan II Research and 2002] [Wolf and Sansone 2002] [Bruner 2002] [Baltes and Spitz 2002] [Fujii et al 2001] [Wolf and Bossert 2001] [Brandon et al 2001] [Palumbo et al 2001] [Alaverdi and Paris 2001] [Yamamoto et al 2001] [Loomis and Palmer 2001] [Abe et al 2001] [Boyce and Paull 2001] [Flights of Discovery Fifty 2000] [Pendleton et al 2000] [Rogers 2000] [Randall et al 2000] [Wheeler 2000] [Colgren and Martin 2000] [Niewald and Parker 2000] [Ground and flight testing 2000] [Wallace 2000] [Denegri 2000] [Schwegler - Lanl and Place - Honeywell 2000] [Conner et al 2000] [Duus 2000] [Gebert et al 2000] [Bertelrud et al 1999] [Appendix F Flight Test 1999] [De Giorgis et al 1999] [Motoda et al 1999] [Roberts and Henderson 1999] [Nguyen and Cord 1999] [Schrauf and Schröder 1999] [Hall et al 1999] [Cenko 1999] [Alford and Knarr 1999] [Carter and Stephenson 1999] [Clemmons 1999] [Ito et al 1999] [Kraus et al 1999] [Lantz 1998] [Fujii and Inoue 1998] [Sarkar and Panneerselvam 1998] [Fujii and Inoue 1998] [Oelker and Friehmelt 1998] [Dupuis and Edwards 1998] [Gayler and Kopra 1998] [Carico 1998] [Bilstein and Wallace 1998] [Berens and Bissinger 1998] [Bruce et al 1998] [Miller et al 1998] [Mertaugh 1998] [Roudakov et al 1998] [Basciano 1998] [Takaki et al 1997] [Watanabe et al 1997] [De Giorgis et al 1997] [Morelli and Morelli 1997] [Smith and Smith 1997] [Cosentino et al 1997] [Watanabe et al 1997] [Peterson 1997] [Brenner et al 1997] [Meyyappa 1996] [Watanabe et al 1996] [McClinton et al 1996] [Hulshoff et al 1996] [Martin 1996] [Williamson et al 1996] [Miyazawa et al 1996] [Ishimoto et al 1996] [Roudakov et al 1996] [Czysz and Murthy 1996] [Stottier 1995] [Manning et al 1995] [Ashenden 1995] [Bean and Lee 1995] [Morelli and Klein 1995] [Traven and Whitley 1995] [Menges 1995] [Burcham et al 1995] [Norlin 1995] [Cho and Nagati 1995] [Srinathkumar et al 1995] [Schkolnik et al 1995] [Richardson 1995] [Sacher and Zellner 1995] [Kannemans 1995] [Dupuis and Edwards 1995] [Morris and Tigner 1995] [Ishimoto 1995] [Lydon and Va 1995] [Fischenberg 1995] [Bufalino 1995] [Davis 1995] [Cenko et al 1995] [Jones 1994] [Hart 1994] [Brennan and McDaniel 1994] [Fletcher 1994] [Cenko 1994] [Kraft 1994] [Bean and Lee 1994] [Svendsen 1994] [Green and Fernandez 1994] [Morelli 1994] [Hensley 1994] [Roberts and Shawler 1994] [Rice and Hazlwood 1994] [Engelien 1994] [Burcham and Burken 1994] [Dungan and Clark 1994] [Bovais and Davidson 1994] [Further development and flight 1994] [Mouritsen 1994] [Incorporating agility flight test 1994] [Rediess and Melton 1994] [Cusimano and Johnson 1994] [Dwyer 1994] [Anderson 1994] [Everett and Oster 1994] [Thornton 1994] [Pawlak 1994] [DiCarlo et al 1994] [Transonic flight test of 1994] [Massengill 1993] [McDaniel 1993] [Application of CFD to 1993] [Rhodes et al 1993] [Chandler and Chisholm 1993] [Sacher 1993] [Blankson and Pyle 1993] [Shirouzu and Watanabe 1993] [Orme and Gilyard 1993] [Khalid and Faherty 1993] [Ashenden 1993] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1993] [Arent and Falatko 1992] [Wittliff et al 1992] [Schweikhard and Baker 1992] [Silz 1992] [Hart 1992] [Cattolica et al 1992] [Crites et al 1992] [Lewis et al 1992] [Knighton 1992] [Hicks 1992] [Muellner and Cusimano 1992] [Fitzgerald 1992] [Holmes and Obara 1992] [Krumenacker and Pellicano 1992] [Howard and Bray 1992] [Metz 1992] [Richardson et al 1992] [Falempin et al 1992] [Burcham et al 1992] [Cross 1992] [Bovais et al 1992] [Kimberlin and Solies 1992] [Hanks and Ham 1992] [Williamson 1992] [Stewart 1992] [Cenko 1992] [Burns 1992] [Thornton and Lamy 1992] [Platz and Bounajem 1992] [Curry et al 1992] [Robertson and Hartfield 1992] [Lackey and Hadfield 1992] [Bertelrud et al 1992] [Reehorst 1992] [Nippress and Wilson 1992] [Throckmorton 1992] [Iliff and Shafer 1992] [Weiss 1992] [Gilyard and Orme 1992] [Orme and Gilyard 1992] [Manning et al 1992] [Pugh 1992] [Gleason et al 1992] [Bever 1992] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1992] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1992] [Morgenfeld 1992] [Moorhouse 1991] [Shlien 1991] [Herrlinger 1991] [Lappos and Phelps 1991] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1991] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1991] [Yip et al 1991] [Cenkci 1991] [Langford et al 1990] [Airfoil static-pressure thrust 1990] [Rusbarsky 1990] [Duranti and Gamalero 1990] [Thompson et al 1990] [Dunn 1990] [Baillie 1990] [Tomlinson et al 1990] [Havey and Ferguson 1990] [Quast et al 1990] [Payne and Samuels 1990] [Dittmann 1990] [Khalid and Faherty 1990] [Moorhouse 1990] [Norton 1990] [Allongue and Krysinski 1990] [Bass and Harding 1990] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1990] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1990] [Yip et al 1990] [Gnoffo 1989] [Sambamurthi et al 1989] [Belte and Ranaudo 1989] [Initial flight test of 1989] [Blanchard 1989] [Donelson et al 1989] [Cheney 1988] [Ward 1988] [Bonnema and Smith 1988] [Vanatta and Inderhees 1988] [Porter 1988] [Kehoe 1988] [Analysis of Gust-Response Flight-Test 1988] [Morger 1988] [Yergensen and Rhea 1988] [Immenschuh 1988] [Rhea and Moore 1988] [Hoadley 1988] [Moore and Harney 1988] [Holbrook 1988] [Roberts 1988] [Talty and Caughlin 1988] [French 1988] [McNally and Bach 1988] [Lampe and Atwater 1988] [Siddiqi and Abraham 1988] [Dobronski 1988] [Fechter and Mills 1988] [Yechout 1988] [Van Fossen and Dewitt 1988] [Li and Wey 1988] [Papa and Stoliker 1988] [Howell 1988] [Simulation in support of 1988] [Desjardins et al 1988] [Kelly 1988] [Adams 1988] [Haftmann et al 1988] [Trujill et al 1988] [Mackall et al 1988] [Roberts and Brown 1988] [McCormick and Smith 1988] [Roberts 1988] [Kohlman et al 1987] [Williams and Hartford 1987] [Micol 1987] [Cheney and Holzer 1987] [Jones 1987] [Lewerenz 1987] [Stefko et al 1987] [Wells 1987] [Brooks 1986] [Hodge and Audley 1986] [Smith and Ramirez 1986] [Kennedy 1986] [Vesely 1986] [Layton 1986] [Kohn and Pangilinan 1986] [Parlini and Combley 1986] [Larson 1986] [Bjorkman et al 1986] [Wang et al 1986] [Rudolph 1986] [Schweikhard and Renz 1986] [Bruce et al 1986] [Largent 1986] [Pietersen 1986] [Bosworth and West 1986] [Burcham et al 1986] [Shawler 1986] [Demo 1986] [Siddiqi and Neate 1986] [Pearson 1986] [Hess 1986] [Miller 1985] [Anderson and Vincent 1985] [Scherz and Tucker 1985] [Davy et al 1985] [Adair and McRoberts 1984] [Hutchinson and Miller 1984] [Haworth and Graham 1984] [Bryant et al 1984] [Winebarger and Neely 1984] [Brooks and Mackall 1984] [Swenson et al 1984] [Myers and Burcham 1984] [Pendergraft and Nugent 1984] [Hart 1984] [Idsardi 1983] [Hoey 1983] [Anderson et al 1983] [Hodge and Audley 1983] [Lamy 1983] [Scott 1983] [Ward and Miley 1983] [Parlini 1983] [Vedrenne 1983] [Thomason 1983] [Hildreth and Burton 1983] [Frinell 1983] [Hague 1983] [Barrett et al 1983] [Taylor and Pamadi 1983] [Ferretti and Carabelli 1983] [Hillaker 1983] [Amin and Hollweger 1983] [Schweikhard 1983] [Campbell and LaFREY 1983] [Holt 1983] [Edwards 1983] [Jones and Wilson 1983] [Fleck 1983] [Larson et al 1983] [Jones et al 1983] [Stengel 1983] [Knotts and Parrag 1983] [Garoutte and Bryan 1983] [Woodbury and Gorman 1983] [Adams and Graves 1983] [Scafetta 1983] [Strock 1983] [Adams 1983] [Adams 1983] [Rosenberg and Schuch 1983] [Burke 1983] [Shawler 1983] [Clarke and Roskam 1982] [Springer et al 1982] [Plaetschke et al 1982] [Iliff and Maine 1982] [Head 1981] [Walters 1981] [Taylor and Klein 1981] [Bennett and Abel 1981] [Burke and Ferris 1981] [Newsom and Pototzky 1981] [Arnold 1981] [Swann et al 1981] [Tracy 1981] [Shields 1981] [Bleimeyer 1981] [Petersen 1981] [Craig and Reich 1981] [Van Pelt 1981] [Bolt 1981] [Kao and Anderson 1981] [Gera et al 1981] [Miley et al 1981] [Flight test of a 1981] [Deckert 1981] [Gibson 1981] [Hodge et al 1981] [Hicks and Greenberg 1981] [Zalesak 1981] [Svec 1981] [Andrews and Gordon 1981] [Matheny and Panageas 1981] [Vincent and Franklin 1981] [Cook 1981] [Macmillan 1981] [Lang 1981] [Holberg and Grabowsky 1981] [Kuppuswamy and Kiran 1981] [Cockrell and Doherr 1981] [Burcham et al 1981] [Throckmorton 1981] [Large et al 1981] [Adolph 1981] [Conklin 1981] [Wygle 1981] [Brown and Bradley 1981] [Bach 1980] [Chase and Rust 1980] [Dix and Mattasits 1980] [Hutchinson and Steinmann 1980] [Schroers 1980] [Schwanz and Grimes 1980] [Cooke 1980] [Van Gaasbeek 1980] [Appich et al 1980] [Rosende 1979] [Tangler 1979] [Kohlman 1979] [Hartmann et al 1979] [Results of an attitude 1979] [Simpson 1979] [Hildebrand 1979] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1979] [Magee and Wernicke 1979] [Broughton 1978] [Lucas et al 1978] [Skarman 1978] [Wallick 1978] [Boirun 1978] [Adolph 1978] [Kain et al 1978] [Doherty 1978] [Mayfield and Smith 1978] [Benson et al 1978] [Wallace 1978] [Wind Tunnel/Flight Test Correlation 1978] [Sachs 1977] [Frierson and Van Meter 1977] [Matthews and Key 1977] [Pursel 1977] [McPherson 1977] [Groening 1976] [Bock 1976] [Putnam and Burcham 1976] [Damman 1976] [Burton and Bischoff 1976] [Richey et al 1976] [Hull and Roger 1975] [Comparison of Aircraft Noise 1975] [Westbrook 1975] [Osder et al 1975] [Petrone and Wessel 1975] [Olhausen 1975] [Atencio 1975] [Chen et al 1974] [Jordan 1974] [Schuringa 1974] [Reukauf et al 1974] [Verstynen 1974] [Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards Afb Ca 1974] [Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards Afb Ca 1974] [Kelly 1974] [Knoblach 1974] [Cotton 1974] [Marshall and Steinmann 1974] [McKenzie 1973] [Atencio and Soderman 1973] [Wilcox 1973] [Anderson et al 1973] [Albion et al 1973] [Miller 1973] [Wingrove 1972] [Edwards 1972] [Nial 1972] [Simpson 1972] [Buss and Nicholson 1971] [Woodman 1971] [Hartwig and Sonneborn 1971] [Brooks 1971] [Holmes and Woehr 1971] [Kreutz 1970] [Cohen 1970] [Neal 1970] [Finnestead et al 1970] [Flight Test Programme 1970] [Coombe 1970] [Rooker 1970] [Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards Afb Ca 1970] [Cruz et al 1969] [Finnestead and Connor 1969] [Schwartz and Wray 1969] [Dempster and Arnold 1969] [Black 1969] [Flint 1969] [Pepper 1969] [Bender 1969] [Long 1968] [Melton and Hall 1968] [Arnold 1968] [Riesenfeld 1968] [Platou 1968] [Ince 1967] [Dominick and Watts 1967] [Ward and Myers 1967] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1967] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1967] [Holway 1966] [Kidd 1966] [Mills and Haas 1966] [Alscher et al 1966] [Herrington et al 1966] [Martin Co Denver Co 1966] [Fine et al 1965] [Nagel and Thomas 1965] [Bratt 1965] [Kertesz 1965] [Turk and Watts 1965] [Flight Test Instrumentation 1965] [Bromberg and Hansen 1965] [Paris 1965] [Langill 1965] [Altman 1965] [Pendleton 1965] [Whitfield and Blackburn 1965] [Key et al 1965] [Sexton 1964] [Gray 1964] [Chase 1964] [Godwin et al 1964] [Sehnert 1963] [Lieberman 1963] [Hodge and Meyer 1963] [Radd 1963] [Weissenburger and Zimmerman 1963] [Erickson et al 1963] [General Dynamics/Astronautics San Diego Ca 1962] [Niehaus 1962] [Mannai 1962] [Gilruth 1962] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1962] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1962] [Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1962] [Bryan 1961] [General Dynamics/Astronautics San Diegoca 1961] [General Dynamics/Astronautics San Diego Ca 1961] [Flight TEST Manual 1959] [The Agard Flight TEST 1959] [Durbin 1959] [Hayden 1958] [Rowen 1958] [Ramjet supersonic “flight tests” 1958] [Davis and Mertens 1958] [Howard 1957] [Seger 1957] [Free flight research tool 1956] [Hager 1955] [Munter 1954] [Howland 1953] [Schumacher 1952] [Estes and McClain 1948] [Schaefer 1948] [Hockman and Eisiminger 1948] [Gessow 1947] [Rice 1946] [Symington 1940] [Kerber 1927] [Aujogue] [Royce] [Pitman] [Freakley] [Wolfe] [Goupil] [Wilson] [Uijt_de_Haag and Vadlamani] [Flight Test Procedures for] [Chase] [Seanor] [Cutright and Braasch] [Smith] [Hinton and Eastlake] [Larrabee]
Identifying a model from flight data
System identification and parameter estimation from flight measurements, which is how a research aircraft turns its flights into numbers.
178 records. [Grauer 2024] [Hosseini and Holzapfel 2022] [Hosseini et al 2025] [Aagren et al 2025] [Rohani et al 2025] [Grauer and Morelli 2024] [Matt 2024] [Grauer 2020] [Grauer and Boucher 2020] [Kukreja and Bernstein 2012] [Hageman et al 2003] [Smith et al 2003] [Murphy 1999] [Morelli 1998] [Murphy 1996] [Pearson 1995] [Tischler 1995] [Kong 1994] [Napolitano and Spagnuolo 1993] [Morelli 1993] [Morelli 1991] [Tischler 1991] [Iliff 1989] [Maine and Murray 1988] [Iliff 1987] [Maine and Iliff 1986] [Jacklin 1986] [Klein 1983] [Trankle and Rabin 1983] [Stephenson 1983] [Padfield and Duval 1982] [Weil 1981] [Queijo et al 1979] [Wingrove 1978] [Hall et al 1978] [Wells and Queijo 1977] [Mabius and Kaufman 1976] [Bryant and Hodge 1975] [Mohr 1975] [Sorensen et al 1975] [Kotob and Kaufman 1975] [Wingrove 1975] [Stepner and Sorensen 1974] [Kotob and Kaufman 1974] [Stepner and Mehra 1974] [Mehra and Tyler 1973] [Wolowicz and Yancey 1973] [Taniguchi 1972] [Holowicz and Holleman 1958] [Donegan 1954] [Calderon Ochoa et al 2026] [An et al 2025] [Hofmann et al 2025] [Hofmann et al 2025] [Kimathi and Lantos 2024] [Singh and Ghosh 2023] [Michek et al 2023] [Kumar and Ghosh 2023] [Simmons 2023] [Raol and Singh 2023] [Na et al 2022] [Qing et al 2022] [Simmons 2022] [Li et al 2021] [Mohamed and Dongare 2021] [Mohamed and Dongare 2021] [Wu and Chen 2021] [Benders et al 2020] [Hosseini et al 2020] [Leung et al 2019] [Mohamed et al 2019] [Hosseini et al 2019] [Ivler et al 2019] [Kumar and Ghosh 2018] [O’Donnell and Mohseni 2018] [Kumar and Ghosh 2018] [Verma and Peyada 2018] [Dhayalan et al 2018] [Morelli and Grauer 2018] [Grauer and Boucher 2018] [Tischler 2018] [Kumar and Ghosh 2017] [Moszczynski and Grant 2017] [McCrink and Gregory 2017] [Ghosh Roy and Peyada 2017] [Saderla et al 2017] [Dykes and Mavris 2016] [Deiler 2016] [Bayoğlu et al 2016] [Göttlicher et al 2016] [Fegely et al 2016] [Mandal and Gu 2016] [Liu et al 2016] [Saderla et al 2016] [Lichota et al 2016] [Ghosh Roy and Peyada 2016] [Pfifer and Danowsky 2016] [Grauer and Morelli 2015] [Jategaonkar 2015] [Kaya and Kutay 2014] [Aksu 2014] [Ozger 2013] [Tischler and Remple 2012] [Development of a Continuous 2012] [Özger 2012] [Giordano de Oliveira Silva and Moennich 2012] [McCracken and Jorris 2011] [Silva 2011] [Cazes et al 2011] [Chowdhary and Jategaonkar 2010] [Morelli 2010] [Taylor et al 2010] [Murphy and Klein 2010] [Peyada and Ghosh 2009] [Kutluay et al 2009] [Han et al 2009] [Campbell et al 2009] [DeBusk et al 2009] [Marwaha et al 2008] [Trittler et al 2008] [Omran et al 2008] [Murphy and Klein 2008] [Nguyen and Krishnakumar 2007] [Singh and Ghosh 2007] [Jayakumar and Das 2007] [Chowdhary and Jategaonkar 2006] [Salis Brasil Neto et al 2006] [Remple and Tischler 2006] [Jategaonkar 2006] [Singh and Ghosh 2006] [Morelli 2006] [Abate and Klomfass 2005] [Jategaonkar 2005] [Singh et al 2005] [Moon et al 2005] [Basappa and Jategaonkar 2004] [Rogers 2002] [Ananthasayanam et al 2002] [Raisinghani and Ghosh 2002] [Morelli 2002] [Napolitano et al 2001] [Napolitano et al 2001] [Morelli 2000] [Ghosh et al 2000] [Lim et al 2000] [Lee and Nagati 1999] [Chen and Valasek 1999] [Raisinghani et al 1999] [Ishimoto and Ishimoto 1997] [Gates et al 1996] [Hamel and Jategaonkar 1996] [Garcia-Velo and Walker 1995] [Raol and Jategaonkar 1995] [Cho et al 1995] [Raisinghani and Kumar 1995] [Napolitano et al 1994] [Klein and Morelli 1992] [Sasa et al 1991] [Maine et al 1990] [Bucharles et al 1990] [Shi Zhong-ke 1990] [Klein 1990] [Klein 1989] [Mulder 1988] [Plaetschke and Weiss 1988] [Padfield 1986] [Lee 1985] [Shafer 1984] [Wells et al 1982] [Taylor 1982] [Wells and Klein 1982] [Wells et al 1981] [Duval 1981] [Travassos and Kaufman 1979] [Klein 1978] [Hague and Glatt 1972] [Iliff and Powers 1969] [Phillips]
Ground facilities against flight
Comparisons of wind-tunnel, computational and flight results, scale effects, and subscale and dynamically scaled flight testing, which is the literature of the residue a research aircraft exists to measure.
224 records. [Cosentino 2007] [Traub 2024] [Ouellette et al 2026] [del Val and Das 2026] [Dippold 2022] [Cuda 2022] [Asper and Simmons 2022] [Simmons and Hatke 2021] [Dougherty 2021] [Mort 2020] [Prislin 2019] [Wadcock et al 2013] [Nance and Reed 2011] [Jordan et al 2005] [Bailey et al 2005] [Abrego et al 2001] [Lamar et al 2001] [Kitaplioglu et al 1997] [McKillip 1997] [Ghaffari 1994] [Flemming et al 1994] [Bowers and Sim 1984] [Bowers and Sandlin 1984] [Fisher and Dougherty 1983] [Goodrich et al 1983] [Wallace 1982] [Dodson 1982] [Niedling 1982] [Madsen 1982] [Nagel 1982] [Ayers 1982] [McKinney and Baals 1982] [Peterson 1982] [Peterson 1982] [Davis 1981] [Ayers 1981] [Peterson et al 1980] [Cahill and Connor 1979] [Daugherty 1979] [Tang et al 1978] [Adams et al 1976] [Fivel et al 1975] [Capone 1975] [Garcia et al 1973] [Rae 1973] [Hicks et al 1972] [Usry and Wallace 1971] [Goodson 1966] [Loving 1966] [Welton 1965] [Carlson 1964] [Hinson 1959] [Huston et al 1955] [Evans 1954] [Anderson 1953] [Denardo and Canning 1952] [Kayten and Koven 1945] [Igra 2026] [Keller et al 2026] [Stalla et al 2026] [Ghate et al 2026] [Alunno et al 2026] [Disotell et al 2026] [Uppoor et al 2026] [Uppoor and Chopra 2026] [Hasegawa 2025] [Kunwar and Chakraborty 2025] [Zhdanov et al 2025] [Simmons et al 2025] [Heaney et al 2024] [Geuther et al 2024] [Akaryildiz et al 2024] [Meeroff et al 2024] [Frey et al 2024] [Dantsker et al 2023] [Yamada et al 2023] [Sansica and Hashimoto 2023] [Panda 2022] [Bertrand-Noël et al 2022] [Tanaka et al 2022] [Jayaraman et al 2022] [Asim et al 2022] [Mullen and Reed 2021] [Gao et al 2021] [Dougherty 2021] [Li et al 2021] [Dantsker et al 2020] [Keidel et al 2019] [Yuan et al 2019] [Warsop and Crowther 2019] [Cruz and Green 2019] [Kubo 2018] [Hitzel and Zimper 2018] [Yokokawa et al 2017] [Ananda et al 2017] [Smith et al 2017] [Yeo et al 2016] [Harasani 2015] [Witkowski et al 2015] [Dantsker and Selig 2015] [Deng and Yuan 2015] [Elhashani et al 2014] [Rose and Fearing 2014] [Dawei and Baoan 2014] [Ahlefeldt and Quest 2014] [Zeng and Kukreja 2013] [Subscale Modeling and Wind 2013] [Reed et al 2012] [Sekula et al 2012] [Glezer 2012] [Schmisseur and Erbland 2012] [Hu and Durbin 2012] [Glezer 2009] [Mack et al 2009] [Veraar 2009] [Muse et al 2008] [Jouannet et al 2008] [Wadhams et al 2008] [Wadhams et al 2008] [Di Clemente et al 2007] [Wadhams et al 2007] [Roncioni et al 2006] [Edquist 2006] [Nicolì et al 2006] [Silva et al 2006] [Bushnell 2006] [Dodson 2005] [Marshall et al 2005] [Fukami et al 2004] [Chedrik et al 2004] [Capra et al 2004] [Johnson and Hall 2003] [Bizzarri and Hendrick 2003] [Ueno et al 2002] [Berry et al 2002] [Stock 2002] [Oleskiw et al 2001] [Yarlett et al 2000] [Croom et al 2000] [Suppe 2000] [Beyers and Ericsson 1999] [Voland et al 1999] [Niewald and Parker 1999] [Erdos 1998] [Acree et al 1997] [Beyers et al 1997] [Perrier et al 1996] [Wang et al 1996] [Saunders 1996] [Yamamoto and Yoshioka 1995] [Yoshinaga et al 1995] [Brandon et al 1995] [Springer 1994] [Nelson et al 1993] [Ghazi 1993] [Pallister et al 1992] [Agarwal et al 1992] [Gnemmi et al 1991] [Lawing et al 1991] [Hill and Zierten 1991] [Dresser et al 1990] [Ross and Olson 1990] [Dittmar 1989] [Carter 1988] [Ericsson 1985] [Prediction and Verification of 1985] [Spurlin and Lueck 1984] [Straub et al 1984] [Zumwalt and Mueller 1984] [Preisser and Chestnutt 1984] [Froechtenigt et al 1984] [Dittmar et al 1983] [Goodrich et al 1983] [Maus et al 1983] [Dittmar and Lasagna 1982] [Bradley et al 1982] [Winchenbach et al 1982] [Rosenthal 1982] [Saltzman and Ayers 1982] [Saltzman and Ayers 1981] [Bradley et al 1981] [Sims and Carter 1981] [FitzSimmons et al 1981] [Walsh and Hart 1981] [Whitefield et al 1981] [Harvey and Bobbitt 1981] [Dougherty and Fisher 1980] [Fitzsimmons et al 1980] [Lu and Lanter 1980] [Potthast 1980] [Webb et al 1979] [Fanning and Lucas 1979] [Hillje and Tymms 1978] [Taylor 1977] [Rooney et al 1977] [Croom 1977] [Strout and Atencio 1976] [Jeffery and Holbeche 1975] [Cocking and Bryce 1975] [Research Instrumentation Requirements for 1974] [Smeltzer et al 1974] [The ram-wing surface effect 1973] [Chamberlin and Blaha 1973] [Jaffe 1972] [Koh 1971] [Penland and Romeo 1971] [Burns 1970] [Gallington and Miller 1970] [Niebanck 1969] [Ham and Johnson 1969] [Blaha 1969] [Brown and Duhon 1965] [Anderson and Stephenson 1965] [Maydew 1964] [Boyer 1964] [Cooksey et al 1964] [Head 1962] [Bamber 1961] [Spreiter and Steffen 1946] [Report no. 618, Comparative 1938] [Andrianatos] [Hypersonic flight regime and] [Danis] [De Crombrugghe]
Demonstrators, prototyping and the acquisition system
Technology demonstrators and the prototyping, readiness, cost-growth and cancellation literature of the acquisition system that buys them.
258 records. [Sterk et al 2016] [Sterk et al 2018] [Welstead et al 2017] [Improving the Military Acquisition 1986] [Coble et al 2014] [Medlej et al 2017] [Marquiz et al 2025] [Veletas 2026] [June et al 2024] [Recine et al 2023] [Cobleigh 2023] [Fidell and Horonjeff 2019] [Pauer 2018] [Castner et al 2018] [Nark et al 2017] [Friedlander et al 2017] [Borer et al 2016] [Patterson et al 2016] [Marmie et al 2015] [Acree and Hoffman 2004] [Turner 2003] [Mobley 1999] [Welch et al 1999] [Integrated propulsion technology demonstrator 1994] [Horne et al 1994] [Spain et al 1993] [Ayers 1990] [Demers et al 1975] [Demers et al 1975] [Hammer et al 2026] [AI-Based Framework for Forecasting 2025] [Alliney et al 2025] [Staats et al 2025] [Dehennis 2025] [Industry Insights on Digital 2025] [Gao et al 2025] [Bouwer and Ignatuk 2025] [Bouwer and Ignatuk 2025] [Korunov 2025] [Hall and Merrett 2025] [Yasir 2025] [Formisano 2024] [Addressing Challenges in Defense 2023] [Kier 2023] [Jones et al 2023] [Incorporating Environmental Considerations into 2023] [Gonzalez et al 2023] [Technology Demonstrator, Close Air 2023] [McNicol 2022] [Sanders et al 2022] [Department of Defense Acquisition 2022] [Improving Defense Acquisition Insights 2022] [Cui et al 2022] [Ross 2022] [Hans et al 2021] [Smotrova et al 2021] [Defense Acquisition in Russia 2021] [Is the Defense Acquisition 2021] [Takarics and Vanek 2021] [Uhlár and Čerňan 2021] [Yu et al 2021] [Angell et al 2020] [Influencing Defense Acquisition Delivering 2020] [Jensen et al 2020] [Return on Investement ROI 2020] [Thinking Critically about Defense 2020] [Carpenter and Cizmas 2020] [Ossmann et al 2019] [Bouwer and Kaiser 2019] [Weinig 2019] [Social Goals of Defense 2019] [Harvey 2019] [Schwartz 2019] [Sivan and Pandian 2018] [Gupta et al 2018] [ISRO Releases the Special 2018] [Masilamani et al 2018] [Tuozzo et al 2017] [Kozlak et al 2017] [Post et al 2017] [Post and Sundt 2017] [Kreuzer and Niehuis 2017] [Bierig et al 2017] [Lavelle 2017] [Mercier and Gierczynski 2017] [Umadevi et al 2017] [Heath et al 2017] [Stahl et al 2017] [Trudelle et al 2017] [Lorell et al 2017] [Light et al 2017] [Sivan and Murmu 2017] [Powell 2017] [Using Cell-DEVS for Prototyping 2017] [Fitzpatrick 2016] [Eckardt et al 2016] [Vieira and Bravo 2016] [Nizin et al 2016] [Okninski et al 2016] [Harris and Centolanza 2016] [Machowski et al 2016] [Silva-Martinez et al 2015] [Bingyan et al 2015] [Terrile et al 2015] [Gideon and Wasek 2015] [Valerdi et al 2015] [Philipsen et al 2015] [Neri 2015] [Kapidžić et al 2014] [Fast 2014] [McNicol and Wu 2014] [Rubinstein 2014] [Biggs et al 2014] [Assessment to Enhance Air 2013] [Muchow 2013] [Franze et al 2013] [Harvey and Ryan 2012] [Defense Acquisition Univ Ft Belvoir Va 2012] [Chiba et al 2012] [Kanayath et al 2012] [Trevino et al 2012] [Euske et al 2012] [Quinn and Choe 2012] [Berteau et al 2011] [Davis 2011] [Threet et al 2011] [Tew and Wallace 2010] [Greer 2010] [Henderson et al 2010] [Brown 2010] [Georgiev 2010] [Edwards et al 2010] [Hellman et al 2010] [Defense Acquisition Univ Ft Belvoir Va 2010] [Gansler et al 2010] [Sharp 2010] [Aggarwal et al 2010] [Sauser et al 2009] [Leite et al 2009] [DeLaurentis 2009] [The acquisition process acquiring 2009] [Franck and Melese 2008] [Blackwell and Millott 2008] [Chiba et al 2008] [International Arms Sales and 2008] [Rendon and Snider 2008] [Reforming Defense Acquisition 2008] [Bolten et al 2008] [Hallberg et al 2008] [The Current American Defense 2008] [The Defense Acquisition Process 2008] [Defense Acquisition Univ Ft Belvoir Va 2007] [Defense Acquisition Univ Ft Belvoir Va 2007] [Kubricky 2007] [Ponton and Warnes 2007] [Chiba et al 2007] [Herkes et al 2007] [Callender et al 2007] [UAV demonstrator opens up 2007] [Tancredi et al 2007] [Franck and Dillard 2006] [Niazi et al 2006] [Richard 2006] [Hallberg et al 2006] [Herkes et al 2006] [Wright 2006] [Chase and McKinney 2005] [Chiesa et al 2005] [Ishimoto et al 2005] [Brinda et al 2005] [McCalmont et al 2005] [Dillard 2005] [Robinson 2004] [Arora and Ananthasayanam 2003] [Campbell 2002] [Bartholomeusz and Geddes 2002] [Innovative Development Global Hawk 2002] [Modeling and Simulation in 2002] [Yamamoto et al 2002] [Clark et al 2002] [Ren 2002] [Whalley et al 2001] [Hablanian et al 2001] [Fielding and Jones 2000] [University Of South Florida Tampa 2000] [Lyle 1999] [Statistics, Testing, and Defense 1999] [Macret and Leveugle 1999] [Christensen et al 1999] [Appendix HAVE BLUE Technology 1998] [Christensen and Gordon 1998] [Turtle and Hermann 1998] [Mead 1998] [Janovsky et al 1998] [Ferranti and Obear 1998] [Clarke and Randall 1997] [Butter et al 1996] [Schmoll and Cochrane 1996] [Kaminski 1996] [Cady and Olsen 1996] [Obear and Ferranti 1996] [Johnson 1995] [Gutierrez et al 1995] [McGinn and Nallanthighal 1993] [Schmoll 1993] [Gould and Jay W. 1993] [Defense Science Board Washington Dc 1993] [Shane 1992] [Logistics Management Inst Bethesda Md 1992] [Rhoads 1992] [Hoyt et al 1992] [Swihart 1992] [Rolls-Royce Ships Aircraft Demonstrator 1992] [Annati and Smyth 1991] [Tran and Simpson 1990] [Davis 1989] [Boger et al 1989] [Jones and Wilbur D. 1989] [NATO and 1992 Defense 1989] [Feeser et al 1989] [Jarvis 1989] [Hughes and Chrispin 1988] [Head-up displays and air 1988] [Chrispin 1988] [Roberts 1987] [Smith et al 1987] [Moir et al 1987] [Johnson and Klassen 1986] [Farmer 1986] [Melgaard 1986] [Baseman 1984] [Draper et al 1983] [Alley 1983] [Hillaker 1983] [Rosenthal and Brandeau 1983] [Shawler 1981] [Dunn et al 1981] [Englar et al 1981] [Clark 1980] [Krone 1980] [Rezy 1980] [Lake et al 1980] [Alexander 1979] [Allan 1979] [Abercrombie 1979] [Barnes et al 1979] [Coker et al 1978] [Bailey 1977] [Barnes et al 1976] [Heidmann 1976] [Simon and Savage 1975] [Byrnes et al 1974] [Marks 1973] [Kailos and Chesser 1972] [Mas Colomer] [Lyshevski] [Deeter et al] [Wood]
The uncrewed turn
Unmanned and remotely piloted aircraft in their development, combat, airspace integration, certification and policy literatures, and the collaborative combat aircraft of the present.
294 records. [Lechniak 2017] [Korecki and Hoika 2026] [Joyce 2026] [Gujral et al 2025] [Kaliardos et al 2024] [Kaliardos et al 2024] [Mbaye et al 2023] [Hayashi et al 2022] [Andreeva-Mori et al 2022] [Munoz 2021] [Bell Textron Inc. 2021] [Jack and Kc 2020] [Jack and Kc 2020] [Rios et al 2020] [Jack et al 2020] [Jung et al 2020] [Kc and Jack 2020] [Monk 2020] [Monk et al 2019] [Aweiss et al 2019] [Monk 2019] [Sakahara 2019] [Munoz 2018] [Martin et al 2018] [Hackenberg et al 2018] [Valkov 2018] [Rorie et al 2018] [Murphy and Otto 2017] [Foster and Hartman 2017] [Jack et al 2017] [Fern 2017] [Ghatas et al 2017] [Ghatas et al 2017] [Kopardekar 2017] [Hayhurst et al 2016] [Dahlgren et al 2016] [Kopardekar 2016] [Kopardekar et al 2016] [Grindle and Hackenberg 2016] [Munoz et al 2016] [Trujillo et al 2015] [Ott 2015] [Hayhurst et al 2014] [Bretmersky et al 2014] [Hobbs 2014] [Randall et al 2014] [Maddalon et al 2013] [Kerczewski et al 2013] [Maddalon et al 2013] [Kerczewski and Griner 2012] [Johnson and Walker 2012] [Richards et al 2011] [Merlin 2009] [Buoni and Howell 2008] [Elario et al 1991] [Maughmer and Somers 1987] [Rezek 1985] [Gossett 1981] [Nelms and Bailey 1974] [Kim 2026] [Asis Mishra 2026] [Choi et al 2026] [Driggs et al 2026] [Kumar et al 2026] [Horbachov et al 2026] [Yan et al 2025] [Willhite and Ghatas 2025] [Faisal and James 2025] [Li et al 2025] [Navickiene et al 2025] [Yue et al 2025] [Wan et al 2025] [Liu et al 2025] [Bajpai et al 2025] [Gómez-Rodríguez and Cuerno-Rejado 2025] [Bulusu et al 2024] [Zenowicz et al 2024] [Duraklar 2024] [Kumar and Kothari 2024] [Cook 2024] [Yang et al 2024] [Yang 2024] [Prasetiyo et al 2024] [Li et al 2024] [Aslan and Erkin 2023] [Aleisa et al 2023] [Maly et al 2023] [González 2023] [Tsench and Kurbanov 2023] [Ashokkumar 2023] [Aleisa et al 2023] [Aslan and Oktay 2023] [Khalid 2023] [Scott 2023] [Liu et al 2023] [Matsuno and Andreeva-Mori 2023] [Bozov 2023] [Reghunath and Ramaiah 2022] [Ramin et al 2022] [Woo et al 2022] [Bakirci and Ozer 2022] [Yang and Yee 2022] [Development Status and Trend 2022] [Mishra et al 2022] [Jayanthi et al 2022] [Friedrich et al 2022] [Zhou et al 2022] [Chang et al 2022] [Mustopa 2022] [Arrabito et al 2021] [Spanò Cuomo and Guglieri 2021] [Liu et al 2021] [Lima Filho et al 2021] [Gierszewski et al 2021] [İşci and Günel 2021] [Yoo et al 2021] [Sijabat and Indriyanto 2021] [Haritos and Barnhart 2021] [Chaurasia and Mohindru 2021] [Semke 2021] [Love and Argrow 2021] [Kumar 2020] [Pan et al 2020] [Neroba 2020] [Design and Development Autonomous 2020] [Hegde 2020] [Maly 2020] [Development of the navigation 2020] [Pugh et al 2020] [Yin et al 2020] [Wang et al 2020] [Tran et al 2020] [Xu et al 2020] [Virgil Petrescu 2019] [Franco et al 2019] [Oda and Miwa 2019] [Turnage et al 2019] [van Rooij et al 2019] [Ananyev 2019] [Bishop 2019] [van Rooij and Cummings 2018] [Airworthiness of unmanned aircraft 2018] [Zimper and Hummel 2018] [Szabolcsi 2018] [Mardiyanto et al 2018] [Gunarathna and Munasinghe 2018] [Hamada and Moreno 2018] [Vicroy et al 2018] [Formation and adjustment of 2018] [van Rooij et al 2018] [Minglang et al 2018] [Ruetten 2018] [Szabolcsi 2018] [Szabolcsi 2018] [Yao et al 2018] [Cook and King 2018] [Colombi et al 2017] [Castrillo et al 2017] [Dong et al 2017] [Răducanu and Cîrciu 2017] [Deepak and Singh 2016] [Gardi et al 2016] [Udroiu and Blaj 2016] [Hoholis et al 2016] [Banfield et al 2016] [Evolution of Human Systems 2016] [Flow Control and High-Lift 2016] [Ernest and Cohen 2016] [Ernest and Carroll 2016] [Zhang et al 2016] [Human Systems Integration for 2016] [Integrating Remotely Piloted Aircraft 2016] [Policy Issues of Remotely 2016] [Ragauskas et al 2016] [McFadyen and Martin 2016] [The Future of Unmanned 2016] [Training Issues for Remotely 2016] [Semke 2016] [Argrow 2016] [Unmanned Aircraft System Operations 2016] [Franke 2016] [Kaymal 2016] [Patterson and Arena 2015] [Guerin 2015] [Design and Fluid Flow 2015] [Li et al 2015] [Wills 2015] [Wills 2015] [Mutuel 2015] [Dong et al 2015] [Lee et al 2014] [Lei 2014] [Jeong et al 2014] [Ruetten et al 2014] [Grzesik and Sobolewski 2014] [Cordero et al 2014] [Nigam 2014] [Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path 2014] [Tvaryanas and Maupin 2013] [Nguyen et al 2013] [Marques et al 2013] [Sasongko and Sembiring 2012] [Tomac et al 2012] [Schütte et al 2012] [Cummings and Schütte 2012] [Ausserer and Harmon 2012] [Tekinalp and Cavus 2012] [Vicroy et al 2012] [Roosenboom et al 2012] [Frink et al 2012] [Dong and Ai 2012] [Voss et al 2011] [Gacy 2011] [Oztekin et al 2011] [Kurkcu et al 2011] [Vallespin et al 2011] [Sathe and Pant 2010] [Choi et al 2010] [Hansu Dai and Jihong Zhu 2010] [Tianyuan and Xiongqing 2009] [Abdelrahman et al 2009] [Cox 2009] [Ganglin 2009] [Nguyen et al 2009] [Cummings et al 2008] [Fu Li et al 2008] [Elkhoury 2008] [Faied and Girard 2008] [Gates and Knudsen 2007] [Gordnier et al 2007] [Fujinaga et al 2007] [Gordnier et al 2006] [Qinkun Xiao et al 2006] [White 2005] [Elkhoury et al 2005] [Ordaz et al 2004] [Newcome 2004] [Elkhoury and Rockwell 2004] [Twesme and Corzine 2003] [Cummings et al 2003] [Li and Chen 2003] [Wyatt 2003] [Cobleigh 2002] [Suminsby 2002] [Pradeep 2002] [Lin 2002] [Klein 2002] [Dickes et al 2002] [Bruening et al 2001] [Frost et al 2000] [Herrick 2000] [Guo and Xu 2000] [Bookstaber 2000] [Guan et al 1999] [Chamitoff 1995] [Baumann and Gal-Or 1992] [Hintzke and Haggard 1991] [Lawton 1990] [Nicholson et al 1988] [Baumgartner et al 1979] [Borst 1978] [Lloyd et al 1978] [Woolley 1978] [A Preliminary Investigation of 1976] [Nelms et al 1976] [Radtke 1976] [Larsen 1975] [Eilertson 1975] [Seaberg et al 1972] [Aerospace - Vehicle Management] [Classification for Unmanned Aircraft] [Marshall] [Wallace] [Sims] [Hartney] [Sunil] [Glīzde] [Ooi] [Hing and Oh] [Silva] [Slapnicar] [Future Flight Systems. Acceptable] [Gordnier et al] [Varela Martínez] [Pilot Training Recommendations for] [Practice for Independent Audit] [Practices for Unmanned Aircraft] [Standard Practice for Development] [Kan] [Wang] [Ge] [Fullmer et al] [Bushey] [Unmanned aircraft systems. Training]
Hypersonic and space-access flight research
Hypersonic flight experiments, scramjet flight, reusable launch vehicles, spaceplanes and lifting entry, which is where the X designation went in its second dense period.
617 records. [Hicks and Trippensee 1997] [Wierzbanowski and Ramasubramanian 2020] [Fain et al 2026] [Wheaton et al 2026] [Mason et al 2024] [Mason et al 2024] [Glass et al 2023] [Berger et al 2022] [Wilder and Prabhu 2021] [Kenyon 2020] [Wilder et al 2020] [Paredes et al 2020] [Paredes and Choudhari 2018] [Mason and Rufer 2015] [Williams and Johnson 2015] [Kostyk and Risch 2013] [Horvath et al 2010] [Thomas et al 2010] [Campbell et al 2009] [Saltzman et al 2007] [Jones 2007] [Jones 2007] [Hudson and Stephens 2007] [Bowers et al 2006] [Research and Technology Organisation Rto 2005] [Laue 2001] [Richards 2000] [Bertelrud et al 2000] [McClinton et al 1999] [Lockheed Martin Skunk Works 1999] [Hunt and Rausch 1998] [Powell et al 1998] [Sawyer and Bush 1997] [Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development 1997] [Bushnell 1997] [Arnold and Deiwert 1997] [Freeman et al 1996] [Iliff and Shafer 1995] [Lewis and Gupta 1995] [Kelly and Blosser 1994] [Green and Bailey 1994] [Andrews and Mackley 1994] [Heeg et al 1993] [Raney et al 1993] [Raney et al 1993] [Maughmer et al 1993] [Andrews and Mackley 1993] [Stewart et al 1992] [Ntuen et al 1992] [Lockman et al 1992] [Edwards 1992] [Thomas and Powell 1992] [Mehta 1992] [Cheng 1992] [Report of the Defense 1992] [Sellers and Dwoyer 1992] [Dress et al 1992] [Rubert and Lopez 1992] [Aero-Space Plane Flexible Access 1991] [Sullivan 1991] [Chapman 1991] [Cleary 1990] [Lockman et al 1990] [Northam 1990] [Wierzbanowski and Kasten 1990] [Quinn and Gong 1990] [Maahs 1989] [Cleary 1989] [Tenney et al 1989] [Hellbaum and Garner 1988] [Johnston and Sawyer 1988] [Hypersonic Drone Vehicle Design 1988] [Cleary 1987] [Northam 1987] [Rizk et al 1987] [Hansen 1987] [Shore 1986] [Young and Findlay 1985] [Schlosser and Dominik 1983] [Lutfi and Nieder 1983] [Young 1982] [Kanipe 1982] [Zakkay et al 1981] [Jones and Huber 1978] [Chyu et al 1978] [Romere et al 1978] [Wilhite 1977] [Freeman and Boyden 1977] [Drzewiecki and Foust 1976] [Andrews and Mackley 1976] [Hawthorne 1976] [Garton 1974] [Milam and Petrozzi 1974] [Nagel and Becker 1973] [Arrington and Woods 1972] [Beachler and Kachel 1972] [Bradley and Buchholz 1972] [Baker 1971] [Love 1971] [Hypersonic Research Facilities Study 1970] [Hypersonic Research Facilities Study 1970] [McGhee 1970] [Couch and Morris 1968] [Boyden and McKinney 1968] [Eggers and Swenson 1967] [Berry 1967] [Andrew et al 1966] [Wilson and Wright 1965] [Potter 1965] [Wall 1964] [Armstrong et al 1962] [Boisseau 1959] [Allen 1958] [Eggers and Syvertson 1955] [Wiseman and Lopez 2026] [Tian et al 2026] [Kim et al 2026] [Lee et al 2026] [Thompson 2026] [Vitale et al 2026] [Yan and Fu 2026] [Russo et al 2026] [Slapikas et al 2026] [Feng et al 2026] [Khamlak 2026] [Azzaro Bradea et al 2026] [Masson-Zwaan 2026] [Reusable Launch Vehicle Landing 2026] [Murcia-Piñeros et al 2026] [Nagata et al 2026] [Woodyard 2026] [MacLeod 2026] [Lau 2025] [Koothan Venkateswaran et al 2025] [Li et al 2025] [MacLeod and Begent 2025] [Dunker et al 2025] [Chen et al 2025] [Xu et al 2025] [Hypersonic Flight 2025] [Ren et al 2025] [Liu et al 2025] [Su and Liu 2025] [Nair and Kukreja 2025] [Wang et al 2024] [Zhang et al 2024] [Yang et al 2024] [Grigoli 2024] [Khambaswadkar 2024] [Martin et al 2024] [Rodríguez-Segade et al 2024] [Ren et al 2024] [Wang et al 2024] [Dongre 2024] [Son et al 2024] [Singh et al 2024] [Kolga and Rundau 2024] [Alvord et al 2024] [Shawyer 2023] [Liu et al 2023] [Esposito 2023] [Li et al 2023] [Singh 2023] [Esposito 2023] [Wu and Zhang 2023] [Ye 2023] [Jahn 2023] [Sandeep 2023] [Bruno 2023] [Hypersonic and Supersonic Flight 2023] [Karabacak and Turan 2023] [Esposito 2023] [Maisaia 2023] [Esposito et al 2023] [Ding et al 2023] [Kwiek et al 2023] [Kondrashov 2023] [Takahashi et al 2023] [Parker 2022] [Griffin and Takahashi 2022] [Prasad 2022] [Hu et al 2022] [Fujio and Ogawa 2022] [Liang et al 2022] [Brumley and Perich 2022] [Li 2022] [Mo et al 2022] [Su et al 2021] [Tanno and Tanno 2021] [Al Fatih et al 2021] [ChoHee Kim et al 2021] [Arabshahi 2021] [Le and Goo 2021] [Nuhija 2021] [Hypersonic Reaction Chamber for 2021] [Zhang et al 2021] [Fujio and Ogawa 2021] [Brahmachary and Ogawa 2021] [Zhang et al 2021] [Le and Goo 2021] [Cheng et al 2021] [Wen et al 2021] [Russo et al 2021] [S. Hameed and G. R 2021] [Pidvysotskyi 2021] [Liang et al 2020] [Wu et al 2020] [El-Kebir and Ornik 2020] [Ricciardi et al 2020] [Hameed and Bindu 2019] [Wen et al 2019] [Creating Hypersonic Flow in 2019] [Cusick and Kontis 2019] [Sforza 2019] [Supersonic and Hypersonic Flight 2019] [Li and Hu 2018] [Balakin et al 2018] [Zhang et al 2018] [de Mûelenaere and Alonso 2018] [Wang and Zhang 2018] [Elisov et al 2018] [Abrahamm and Valsa 2018] [Ma et al 2017] [Hu and Zhu 2017] [AL-Bakri and Kluever 2017] [Lei et al 2017] [Brewer 2017] [Chen 2017] [Neill and Pesyridis 2017] [van den Abeelen 2017] [Hao et al 2017] [Jianguo et al 2016] [Marks 2016] [Effect of Ground Proximity 2016] [Daidzic 2016] [Numerical Optimization on Approach 2016] [van den Abeelen 2016] [El-Sayed 2016] [Putnam and Braun 2016] [Spaceplane Coordinates 2016] [Maddock and Minisci 2016] [XCOR, Developing the Next 2016] [Welberg et al 2015] [Takahashi et al 2015] [European Space Agency launches 2015] [Zhi et al 2015] [India to launch prototype 2015] [Junaid R and Beebi M 2015] [Kontogiannis et al 2015] [Zhiqiang et al 2015] [Zhu and Liu 2015] [Gibney 2015] [Spaceplane trip 2015] [Filatyev et al 2014] [Najam 2014] [Gongjun 2014] [Baran et al 2014] [Hypersonic Flight 2014] [Meuwly 2014] [Liu et al 2014] [Bin 2014] [Dufour et al 2014] [Chavagnac et al 2013] [Le Goff and Moreau 2013] [Tournes 2013] [Trivailo et al 2013] [Launius 2013] [Tian et al 2013] [Dietrick 2013] [Rabadan and Weigand 2013] [Nance 2013] [Hagenmaier et al 2013] [Boles and Milligan 2013] [Launius 2013] [Zhang et al 2012] [Poderico et al 2012] [van Pelt 2012] [Vaughn et al 2012] [Wu Liaoni and Wang Mengmeng 2012] [Dalle et al 2012] [Losik 2012] [Nebylov and Nebylov 2011] [Falkiewicz et al 2011] [Hass et al 2011] [Hypersonic plane makes brief 2011] [Song et al 2011] [Eggers et al 2011] [Cowling 2011] [Steelant 2011] [Marschall 2011] [The graphic Skylon reusable 2011] [TsAGI investigations on hypersonic 2011] [Mamplata and Tang 2011] [Frendreis and Cesnik 2010] [Kelly et al 2010] [Lauer et al 2010] [Candler 2010] [Dalle et al 2010] [Xu and Tang 2010] [Skujins and Cesnik 2010] [Courtland 2010] [Chawla et al 2010] [Sternberg 2010] [US Air Force spaceplane 2010] [Eggers et al 2009] [Bentley 2009] [Bentley 2009] [Mirmirani et al 2009] [Cui et al 2009] [Rehman et al 2009] [Ahuja and Hartfield 2009] [Ueda et al 2009] [Kluever et al 2009] [Garg and Dodiyal 2009] [Molina et al 2009] [Kuzin et al 2009] [Weiland and Hirschel 2009] [Bentley 2009] [Steelant 2009] [Hirschel and Weiland 2009] [Rehman et al 2009] [Steelant 2008] [Johnson and Servidio 2008] [Kuranov and Korabelnikov 2008] [Tirtey et al 2008] [Mullenix et al 2008] [Kobayashi and Suzuki 2008] [Tang and Chase 2008] [Hank 2007] [Yuta Akai et al 2007] [Berry and Horvath 2007] [Lauer 2007] [Gong et al 2006] [Tuohy 2006] [Kishida 2006] [Riggins et al 2006] [Michael A. Bolender 2006] [Lindsey and McMullan 2006] [Continuing to push the 2006] [Foelsche et al 2006] [Steelant 2006] [Glass et al 2006] [Berend and Talbot 2006] [Yang et al 2006] [Janardanan and Jayakumar 2006] [Froning 2006] [Rasky et al 2006] [Martin 2006] [Lauer 2006] [Lu 2005] [Larsen 2005] [McDaniel 2005] [Brown and Olds 2005] [Bolender and Doman 2005] [Boudreau 2005] [Cockrell et al 2005] [Kim 2005] [Kirschstein and Alles 2005] [Daniel and Ramusat 2005] [Hall and Shtessel 2005] [Kluever and Horneman 2005] [Dissel et al 2005] [Daniel et al 2004] [Advanced Hypersonic Spaceplane Multi-Role 2004] [Hirschel and Meier 2004] [Shimoyama et al 2004] [Juliana et al 2004] [Schmitt and Burchett 2004] [Guizzo 2004] [Guizzo 2004] [Kirschstein and Alles 2004] [Sponable et al 2004] [Eklund 2004] [Horneman and Kluever 2004] [Brock and Franke 2004] [Gage and Vander Kam 2003] [Wallace et al 2003] [Chavagnac 2003] [Larsen 2003] [Riggins et al 2003] [Mendham 2003] [Fidan et al 2003] [Yamanaka 2003] [Marlow 2003] [Urschel and Cox 2003] [Cook and Hueter 2003] [Rooney 2003] [Coue 2003] [Arora et al 2003] [Hagopian 2002] [Candler and Nompelis 2002] [Ngo and Doman 2002] [Kokan and Olds 2002] [Noneman 2002] [Knight 2002] [Shtessel et al 2002] [Kaplan 2002] [Spaceplane History 2002] [Spaceplane Low-Cost Potential 2002] [Sachs and Moravszki 2002] [The Spaceplane Space AGE 2002] [McClinton et al 2002] [Tsuchiya and Suzuki 2001] [Meyerson and Taylor 2001] [Mehta and Bowles 2001] [Yamanaka et al 2001] [Taguchi et al 2001] [Marcum 2001] [Sato et al 2001] [Robinson and Gerwin 2001] [Kobayashi and Tanatsugu 2001] [Kobayashi et al 2001] [Ishikawa and Ogasawara 2001] [Mori et al 2001] [Corban et al 2001] [Der Kiureghian 2001] [Stytz et al 2001] [Mehta and Bowles 2001] [Calhoun 2000] [Tyll et al 2000] [Larsen 2000] [Rey 2000] [Callies and Wimmer 2000] [Tetlow et al 2000] [Hertzfeld 2000] [Shtessel et al 2000] [Dorsey et al 2000] [Letchworth and Letchworth 2000] [Suzuki 2000] [Taguchi et al 1999] [Dorsey et al 1999] [Shepperd and Staugler 1999] [Nebylov et al 1999] [Gardinier and Taylor 1999] [Bogdonoff 1999] [Fallon et al 1999] [Knapp 1999] [Zimpfer 1999] [Mease et al 1999] [Mori et al 1999] [Staniszewski 1999] [Birkeland and Meuser 1999] [Cvrlje et al 1999] [Tuohy 1998] [Olds and Bellini 1998] [Stapleton et al 1998] [McClure 1998] [Klevatt and Gaubatz 1998] [Meyerson 1998] [Herzog et al 1998] [Sawyer and Bush 1998] [Ferrandon 1998] [Konno et al 1998] [Eckmann et al 1998] [Bayer 1998] [Tournes and Johnson 1998] [Tournes and Johnson 1998] [Wangu and Mouyos 1998] [Tanck and Steadman 1998] [Karasopoulos et al 1998] [Tsuchiya and Suzuki 1998] [Andrews 1998] [Sippel and Sippel 1997] [Stapleton et al 1997] [Richards and Monaghan 1997] [Blosser 1997] [Fujii and Tamura 1997] [Sawyer et al 1997] [Cordes and Hertzfeld 1997] [Ferrandon 1997] [Ball et al 1997] [Kilgore and Kilgore 1997] [Tatry et al 1997] [Shtessel et al 1997] [Freeman et al 1997] [Shtessel and Krupp 1997] [Sato et al 1997] [Penn and Lindley 1997] [Logsdon and Williamson 1997] [Wegener 1997] [Eckmann et al 1997] [Baumgartner 1997] [MacLean and Rodriguez 1996] [Springer 1996] [Gouskov et al 1996] [Inokuchi 1996] [Sippel and Pohl 1996] [Fitzsimmons 1996] [Bakos et al 1996] [Sachs and Dinkelmann 1996] [Maita and Kobayashi 1996] [Elvin 1996] [Komar and Christenson 1996] [Mehta 1996] [Freeman et al 1996] [Zubrin and Clapp 1996] [Wassel et al 1995] [Clapp 1995] [Kobayashi and Maita 1995] [Hiraiwa et al 1995] [Cox et al 1995] [McConnaughey et al 1995] [Reusable Launch Vehicle 1995] [Cook 1995] [Froning et al 1995] [CFD optimization and test 1994] [Dumbacher and Klevatt 1994] [Allen et al 1994] [Iliff and Shafer 1993] [Ashford 1993] [Sillen 1993] [Froning and Bussard 1993] [Phillips and Cruz 1993] [Kossira et al 1993] [White 1993] [Maita et al 1993] [Savu and Trifu 1993] [Reubush 1992] [Edwards 1992] [Raillon et al 1992] [Bowcutt 1992] [Light High-Temperature Aluminum Alloys 1992] [Berkes 1992] [Yan and von der Dunk 1992] [Mallet et al 1992] [Jones and Petley 1991] [Kamath et al 1991] [Petley et al 1991] [Hindash and Spaid 1991] [Raney and Lallman 1991] [Campbell 1991] [Yanagihara et al 1991] [Facility Requirements for Hypersonic 1991] [Sachs and Schoder 1991] [Betin 1991] [Ohkami et al 1991] [Hans and Stine 1991] [Kato 1991] [Jekosch 1991] [Wegener 1991] [Zagainov and Plokhikh 1991] [Ito et al 1990] [Buffo 1990] [Mehta 1989] [Sams 1989] [Antonenko and Ebeling 1989] [Rodiere et al 1988] [Kors 1988] [Hermes Spaceplane in MBB 1988] [Reding and Svendsen 1988] [Herholz and Valentiny 1988] [Zarrouati et al 1988] [Mease and Vinh 1988] [Ferro and Costamagna 1988] [Feustel-Büechl 1988] [Safety advisory committee on 1987] [Anderson 1987] [Skoog 1987] [Thomas et al 1987] [Marshall 1986] [Holden 1986] [Lemaignen et al 1986] [Lemaignen et al 1986] [Coons 1986] [Marshall 1986] [Tewell 1984] [Redding 1984] [Green et al 1983] [Thomas and Guy 1982] [Griswold et al 1982] [Pruett et al 1981] [Grabowsky et al 1981] [Giles et al 1981] [Harris et al 1980] [Trimpi 1980] [Chase 1979] [Scott 1978] [Simons 1975] [South 1974] [Bulmer 1974] [Rollstin 1973] [Stollery 1972] [French and Howard 1971] [DiFranco 1971] [Dana 1968] [Young 1966] [Grunnet and Laster 1966] [Hypersonic flight 1965] [Flight Sciences Lab Inc Buffalo Ny 1964] [Dayman 1964] [Underwood 1964] [Harney 1963] [Foreman 1963] [Development of the Shock 1962] [Nagamatsu 1962] [Survey of Shock Tube 1962] [Supersonic and Hypersonic Flight 1960] [Nonweiler 1959] [Doherty] [Sun] [Nebylov and Tomita] [Caplin] [Smith] [Wetzel] [Coakley] [Gupta] [Guodong Ning et al] [Austin] [Morito et al] [Ingvarson et al] [Hypersonic flight] [Vannier] [Pulsonetti] [Al Bakri] [Shtessel and Krupp] [Penn and Lindley] [Gilbert]
Vertical-flight research aircraft
Vertical and short take-off aircraft, tiltrotors, tilt-wings and convertiplanes, which form the largest thematic block of the series’ first two decades and returned with the X-76.
626 records. [Ivanco et al 2023] [Persson and Lawrence 2017] [Grima et al 2016] [Grima 2016] [Hange 2016] [Dudley 2016] [Koning 2016] [Theodore et al 2014] [Johnson 2003] [Franklin 2000] [Lam 1998] [Dugan and Hindson 1997] [Anderson and Lebacqz 1997] [Fricker et al 1992] [Franklin and Nicholas 1992] [Albers and Zuk 1992] [Esker and Debonis 1991] [Foster et al 1991] [Maclean 1991] [Merrick et al 1990] [Smith and McArdle 1990] [Albers and Zuk 1990] [Bucknell et al 1990] [Anderson 1990] [Franklin and Stortz 1989] [Eskey and Wilson 1989] [Mihaloew and Drummond 1989] [George et al 1989] [Albers and Zuk 1988] [Kuhn 1987] [Franklin 1986] [Kuhn 1986] [Alexander et al 1986] [Eskey and Wilson 1986] [Lord 1985] [Tischler et al 1985] [White et al 1985] [Nelms 1984] [Eskey et al 1984] [Nelms and Anderson 1984] [Franklin and Anderson 1984] [Koenig 1984] [Wilson et al 1983] [Bailey et al 1983] [Merrick 1982] [Beard and Foley 1982] [Margason 1982] [Foley et al 1982] [Luidens et al 1981] [Nelms and Durston 1981] [Kidwell 1981] [Henderson and Walters 1981] [Aulehla and Kissel 1981] [Anderson 1981] [Williams and Ybarra 1981] [Williams and Ybarra 1981] [Miller et al 1981] [Roberts et al 1981] [Adelt 1981] [Roberts and Anderson 1981] [Brown 1981] [Lewis and Lewis 1981] [Meuleners 1981] [Glasgow et al 1981] [Roth et al 1980] [Preliminary design study of 1980] [Cole et al 1980] [Margason and Hoad 1979] [Zalay et al 1979] [Alexander et al 1979] [Deckert 1979] [Stockman 1979] [V/STOL flight simulation 1979] [Falarski 1979] [Lewis et al 1978] [Large scale static tests 1978] [Anderson 1977] [Gerdes 1977] [Eigenmann and Bailey 1977] [Koenig et al 1977] [Deckert 1977] [Preliminary design of propulsion 1977] [Willis and Genever-Watling 1977] [Aiken 1977] [Roberts and Anderson 1977] [Luidens 1976] [Obrien 1976] [Bland et al 1976] [Rolls et al 1976] [Cicolani and Meyer 1975] [Kvaternik 1974] [Pegg et al 1974] [Deckert and Rolls 1974] [Feistel et al 1972] [Anderson and Schroers 1972] [Bondi and Robinson 1971] [Wolkovitch et al 1971] [Chambers 1971] [Diedrich et al 1971] [Isakson 1970] [Isakson 1970] [Margason 1970] [Rae and Shindo 1969] [Fearn and Margason 1969] [Cosgrove et al 1968] [Joppa 1968] [Kenyon 1968] [Research directed toward determination 1968] [Hall et al 1967] [Cook and Hickey 1967] [McKinney and Newsom 1967] [Deal et al 1967] [Hammond and McLemore 1967] [Hall et al 1967] [Kuhn 1967] [Campbell 1967] [Newsom 1967] [Hickey et al 1966] [McKinney et al 1966] [Scientific and Technical Information Division 1966] [Anderson 1966] [McLemore 1966] [Alford and Harris 1966] [Hassell and Kirby 1966] [Joppa 1966] [Dicarlo et al 1966] [Freeman and Newsom 1966] [Garren and Kelly 1966] [Goodson 1966] [Biggers et al 1966] [Brewer 1966] [Chambers and Grafton 1966] [Heyson and Grunwald 1966] [Joppa and Shindo 1965] [Kuhn 1965] [Campbell 1965] [Rolls 1965] [Reeder 1965] [Wetmore 1965] [Maggitti 1965] [Kuhn et al 1964] [Garren et al 1964] [Kirby and Newsom 1964] [Quigley 1964] [Campbell 1964] [Kirby and Parlett 1964] [Reeder 1964] [Alford et al 1963] [Campbell 1963] [Turner and Drinkwater 1963] [Huston et al 1963] [McKinney and Newsom 1962] [A Preliminary Study of 1961] [Luoma 1961] [Louma 1961] [Maglieri et al 1961] [Drinkwater 1961] [Foster and Morris 1961] [Foster and Morris 1960] [Olstad 1960] [Anderson 1960] [Tapscott 1960] [Kirby 1960] [Conference on V/Stol Aircraft 1960] [Anderson 1960] [NASA Conference on V/STOL 1960] [Holzhauser and Innis 1960] [Whitten 1960] [Alford and Luoma 1960] [Kuhn 1960] [Zimmerman 1960] [Zhao et al 2026] [Wang et al 2026] [Panayotov and Zikyamov 2026] [Erk et al 2026] [Liu et al 2026] [Dragos Daniel et al 2026] [Lovera et al 2026] [Tormen et al 2026] [Sridhar and Smith 2026] [Yu and Zhao 2026] [Zheng et al 2026] [Xu et al 2026] [Hu et al 2026] [Adeyemi et al 2026] [Delgado et al 2026] [Guan et al 2025] [Li and Yang 2025] [Kanishk Mahaveer Jain 2025] [Feng et al 2025] [Thornburgh et al 2025] [Wiston and Yan 2025] [Lira Sassett et al 2025] [Wang et al 2025] [Choi et al 2025] [Bhardwaj and Holzapfel 2025] [Park and Roh 2025] [Chen and Guo 2025] [Jiang et al 2025] [Head 2025] [Huang and German 2025] [Zhao et al 2025] [Lim and Jung 2025] [Sagan et al 2025] [Savino 2025] [Zhang et al 2025] [Zhu and Wang 2025] [Park and Park 2025] [Fu et al 2025] [Basnight et al 2025] [Liang et al 2025] [Application of Fluidic Thrust 2024] [Chen and Pérez-Arancibia 2024] [Zhu et al 2024] [van der Meulen et al 2024] [Oyama et al 2024] [Gul and Yeo 2024] [Carlson and Papachristos 2024] [Qu et al 2024] [Axten et al 2024] [Santos Martins Nunes and Su 2024] [Zhang et al 2024] [Li et al 2024] [Akagi et al 2024] [Juhasz et al 2023] [Kang et al 2023] [Prabhakar et al 2023] [Wen et al 2023] [Bath et al 2023] [Panish et al 2023] [Henkenjohann et al 2023] [Zhang et al 2023] [Hyun et al 2023] [Yeo et al 2023] [Belák and Hromčík 2023] [Virasak 2022] [Zhou et al 2022] [Yuan et al 2022] [Lu et al 2022] [Arora et al 2022] [Zanon and De Gennaro 2022] [Dikshit et al 2022] [Juhasz et al 2022] [Tran and Lim 2022] [Sheng et al 2022] [Bath et al 2022] [Ma et al 2022] [Dong and Li 2022] [Su et al 2021] [Chen and Chen 2021] [Baggett et al 2021] [Dollinger et al 2021] [Marvakov and Holzapfel 2021] [Govindarajan and Sridharan 2021] [Appleton et al 2021] [Zhou et al 2021] [Bachmaier and Anderson 2021] [Carlson and Papachristos 2021] [Bath et al 2021] [Sagan et al 2021] [Xu et al 2020] [Gao et al 2020] [Bauersfeld and Ducard 2020] [Tran and Lim 2020] [Wang et al 2020] [Russell and Conley 2020] [Schatzman and Malpica 2019] [Chen et al 2019] [Uehara and Matthies 2019] [Lim 2019] [Staruk and Datta 2019] [Sheikman and Norman 2019] [Muscarello 2019] [Li and Xia 2018] [Li and Xia 2018] [Franklin 2018] [Apkarian 2018] [Sargent and Anemaat 2018] [Ng and Datta 2018] [Xiao et al 2018] [Helicopter and Tiltrotor Flight 2018] [Pan et al 2018] [Tiltrotor Aircraft Modelling and 2018] [Zhang et al 2018] [V-22 and AW609 Tiltrotors 2018] [Yang and Wang 2017] [Bevan et al 2017] [Kambampati and Smith 2017] [Li and Xia 2017] [Shen and Kang 2017] [Cao et al 2017] [Liang et al 2017] [Kang et al 2017] [Di Francesco and Mattei 2016] [Zhen Pan et al 2016] [Droandi and Gibertini 2015] [Costa et al 2015] [Moore 2015] [Young 2015] [Bevan et al 2015] [Brown et al 2015] [Hernandez-Garcia and Rodriguez-Cortes 2015] [Flores et al 2014] [Qi and Wenhai 2014] [Oktay 2014] [Tan et al 2014] [Huangzhong et al 2014] [Vertical Takeoff and Landing 2014] [Li and Xia 2014] [Newman et al 2014] [Ibrahim and Bil 2013] [Do and Paxman 2013] [Simioni et al 2013] [Young and Rajagopalan 2013] [Kim et al 2013] [Scott and Schrage 2012] [Gibson et al 2012] [Juhasz et al 2012] [Colella et al 2012] [Slaby and Smith 2011] [Yang and Xia 2011] [Young et al 2011] [Kim et al 2011] [Tho and Smith 2011] [Paik and Gandhi 2010] [Choi and Kim 2010] [Gennaretti et al 2010] [Transition Dynamics of VTOL 2010] [VTOL Aircraft Control Design 2010] [Yue and Xia 2009] [Cooper et al 2009] [Hassan 2008] [Kim and Shin 2008] [Bevilaqua et al 2007] [Paik et al 2007] [Baldwin 2007] [Mayer and Wozniak 2006] [Ferguson and Dreier 2005] [Bi et al 2005] [Tiltrotor Aircraft SCAS Design 2005] [Carlson and Zhao 2004] [Foster 2003] [Carlson and Zhao 2003] [LaBiche 2003] [Johnson et al 2003] [Yassini and Syrovy 2002] [Chana 2002] [Bi and Haas 2002] [Carlson and Zhao 2002] [Representative Operations of V/STOL 2002] [Nadimi and Frazer 2001] [Fielding and Southworth 2001] [Fenny and Hart 2000] [Song et al 2000] [Viper CNC fibre placement 2000] [Nixon et al 1999] [Ford 1999] [Calise and Rysdyk 1998] [Srinivas et al 1998] [Polak and George 1998] [Faass 1998] [Chen et al 1998] [Srinivas and Chopra 1998] [Calise et al 1997] [Rysdyk et al 1997] [Hirschberg 1997] [Brunson and Rais-Rohani 1996] [Stewart and Walters 1996] [Spencer et al 1996] [Srinivas and Chopra 1996] [Tai 1996] [Gerald-Yamasaki 1996] [Srinivas et al 1995] [Pruyn and Lönroth 1993] [Meakin 1993] [Okuno and Kawachi 1993] [Riley Jr. 1992] [MacLean et al 1992] [Birckelbaw and Nelson 1992] [Engelland et al 1992] [Uppaluri and Douglass 1991] [Garg and Mattern 1991] [Franklin and Engelland 1991] [Liu and McVeigh 1991] [Platt 1991] [Rangacharyulu and Moore 1991] [Lind and Beck 1991] [Chambers 1991] [Camacho 1991] [McVeigh et al 1990] [Yoo and Strash 1990] [Schneider 1989] [Green and Andrews 1989] [Moffatt 1989] [NASA National Civil Tiltrotor 1989] [Lewis 1989] [Ward 1989] [Rosenthal et al 1988] [Taylor and Wilkerson 1988] [Gamon 1988] [Raymer 1988] [Ford CEng MRAes 1988] [Hamilton and Richardson 1988] [Brieger et al 1987] [Bauer 1987] [Batterton and Blaha 1987] [Eisenberg and Bowles 1986] [The role of human 1986] [Sheridan 1986] [Schrage and Meyer 1986] [Saripalli and Kroutil 1985] [Gleiter 1985] [Eshlemen 1985] [Bodson and Athans 1985] [Sheridan 1985] [Moller 1985] [Radford and Andrisani 1984] [Lebacqz and Scott 1984] [Chu et al 1983] [Anderson 1983] [Thomason 1983] [Griffin 1983] [Kalemaris 1983] [Calise and Kramer 1982] [Durbin and McGeer 1982] [Kuhn 1982] [Digital Engine Control for 1982] [Clark 1982] [Thomason 1982] [Bradfield 1981] [Willis 1981] [Durston and Smith 1981] [Wilson et al 1981] [Stevens et al 1981] [Woollett 1981] [Lind and Tamplin 1981] [Wernicke 1980] [Crafa and Reed 1980] [Nishimura 1980] [Kress 1980] [Willis 1980] [Willis 1980] [Reed 1980] [Caldwell and Lafavor 1980] [Siclari et al 1980] [Foley and Woodrey 1980] [Burley 1979] [Hill and Jenkins 1979] [Defense Science Board Washington Dc 1979] [Kuhn 1979] [Chance Vought Corp Dallas Tx 1979] [Kotansky and Bower 1978] [McGee et al 1978] [Nelms 1978] [Knott 1978] [Wilcox and Quigley 1978] [Osterman and Mulley 1977] [Jensen and Pera 1977] [Sellers et al 1977] [Zabinsky and Burnham 1977] [Kalemaris and Cea 1977] [Rolls and Aoyagi 1977] [Waesche and Migdal 1977] [Feddersen and Cea 1977] [McGee 1977] [Renselaer 1977] [Johnson and Craig 1976] [Guy 1976] [Platzer and Margason 1976] [Louisse and Marshall 1976] [Beattie 1975] [Zabinsky and Burnham 1975] [Salter 1975] [Winston et al 1975] [Novak 1975] [Lander and Palcza 1974] [Henschel et al 1974] [Campbell and Quinn 1974] [Lieblein et al 1973] [Schmitz and Stepniewski 1973] [Daffer and Rogers 1973] [Clarke et al 1973] [Salkind 1973] [Marr and Neal 1972] [Deckert and Evans 1972] [Sambell 1972] [Wood 1972] [McElreath 1972] [Rudolph 1972] [Hall and Hodder 1971] [Hill 1971] [Hoffman et al 1971] [Curtiss 1971] [Jones 1971] [Mendela 1971] [Key 1971] [V/STOL R and D 1971] [V/STOL World wide view 1971] [Hoffman 1971] [VTOL ‘a matter of 1971] [Lo 1971] [Balke 1970] [Winborn 1970] [Skifstad 1970] [Bryson et al 1970] [Sinacori 1970] [Pruyn and Taylor 1970] [Curtiss 1970] [Sternfeld and Hinterkeuser 1970] [Dukes 1970] [Wachtell 1970] [Tuck 1970] [Yuan 1970] [Swaim 1970] [Hall 1970] [Darling et al 1970] [Kelley 1970] [Deckert and Hickey 1970] [Lo 1970] [Ramnath 1970] [Rich 1969] [Swaim 1969] [Asher 1969] [Rogers et al 1969] [Rich 1969] [Howze 1969] [Keller 1969] [Kemp 1969] [Windolph 1969] [Adarkar and Hall 1969] [Detore and Gaffey 1969] [Turner 1969] [VTOL - 1968 1969] [Kazan and Krause 1968] [Brown and Fisher 1968] [Connors and Swaim 1968] [Hall 1968] [Swaim and Connor 1968] [Edenborough 1968] [PlCKERELL and Cresswell 1968] [Telford and Vasiloff 1968] [Beebe 1968] [Spooner 1968] [Winick 1968] [Schade 1968] [Dendy and Tribken 1968] [Garner 1967] [Watson et al 1967] [Lavi 1967] [Fry 1967] [Katzenberger 1967] [Cole and England 1967] [Bagan 1967] [Overfield and Crawford 1967] [Kentfield 1967] [Hall 1967] [Egerton and Fitzpatrick 1967] [Robbins 1967] [Spillman 1967] [Haugen 1966] [Tindell 1966] [Beppu et al 1966] [Statler 1966] [McGREGOR and Smith 1966] [Hargest 1966] [Goldberger 1966] [Kutney 1966] [Barker 1966] [Steils 1966] [Smith 1966] [Brown 1965] [Pauli 1965] [Jacobson 1965] [McCormack and Poteate Jr. 1965] [Hall 1965] [Harned and Head 1965] [Gallagher and O’Donnell 1965] [Beeler 1965] [Przedpelski 1965] [Mueller 1965] [Miller and Clark 1965] [Rodenbaugh and Veno 1965] [Day 1965] [Heintzman 1965] [Price 1964] [Friend 1964] [Stutz and Price 1964] [Schwartz and Shearer 1964] [George et al 1964] [Stepniewski and Schneider 1964] [Kirby 1964] [Goland et al 1964] [Hatta and Matsuki 1964] [Price 1964] [Westbrook 1964] [Morris et al 1964] [Sallee 1964] [Sanders 1964] [Hill and Schmitt 1964] [Butler and Thomas 1964] [Wells and Yinger 1964] [Henderson 1964] [Hazen 1963] [Ostheimer and Giguere 1963] [McIntyre 1963] [Putman 1961] [Brogan et al 1961] [Muse 1961] [Nichols 1960] [Richardson 1959] [Campbell 1959] [Bloomfield 1959] [Woods 1957] [O’Mallei 1957] [Zimmerman 1957] [Coward and Hinz 1956] [Boeing Co Morton Pa Vertol Div 1956] [McCormick 1956] [Irvin and Swan 1956] [Rysdyk and Calise] [Cabarbaye] [Helicopter and V/Stol Aircraft] [Pilot Training and Certification] [Hoffrichter] [Dousis] [Vertiports - Infrastructure and]
The sponsoring institutions
The National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, NASA and its flight research centres, DARPA and the Air Force Research Laboratory, and the literature of aeronautics research policy.
164 records. [Roland 1984] [Hansen 1986] [Chambers 2000] [Recapturing NASA’s Aeronautics Flight 2012] [Decadal Survey of Civil 2006] [NASA Aeronautics Research 2008] [The Darpa Model for 2024] [Edelman 2024] [Kenyon et al 2021] [Rivers 2019] [Park et al 2013] [Jones and Bui 2012] [Horn 2012] [Jacobson 2012] [Jacobson 2012] [Wolfe and Bakalyar 2011] [Chan 2011] [Bosworth 2010] [Brown 2009] [Brown 2009] [Jacobson 2009] [Moes 2009] [Altitude Wind Tunnel at 2008] [Horn 2008] [Cox 2008] [Cobleigh 2008] [Miller 2007] [Bosworth 2007] [DelFrate 2007] [Bosworth 2006] [Cosentino 2006] [Weeks et al 2006] [Jones et al 2005] [Grossman et al 1999] [Mack 1998] [Levy 1998] [Gorn 1996] [Powers 1994] [DelFrate and Deets 1994] [Dryden Overview for Schools 1994] [Dryden Tour Tape, 1994] [Proceedings of the Ninth 1993] [Binkley and Mackall 1992] [Deangelis and Anderson 1992] [NACA/NASA History at Dryden 1990] [Mackall et al 1990] [Bilstein 1989] [Felt and Kehoe 1985] [Ward 1984] [Sefic 1981] [Anderson 1981] [NASA’s aeronautics program Systems 1980] [Anderson 1976] [Emme 1976] [Jones 1974] [Gustafson 1970] [Gustafson 1970] [Gustafson 1970] [Gustafson 1970] [Gustafson 1970] [Gustafson 1970] [Langley Research Center 1966] [Stack 1962] [NACA Conference on Aircraft 1957] [Hieser et al 1956] [Bowman 1956] [Windham 1956] [Fisher and McBride 1955] [Fisher and Windham 1955] [Fisher and Thompson 1955] [Bowman 1955] [Stevens 1955] [Mitchell and Peck 1949] [Bryant 1948] [Scher 1947] [Brown 1944] [Srivasatava and Arun Kumar 2025] [Carroll 2025] [Walan and Lydecker 2023] [Ranka 2020] [Piore et al 2020] [Boone Bonvillian 2020] [Windham 2020] [Datta et al 2020] [Fotia et al 2019] [Garg 2018] [Hargus et al 2018] [Adibhatla et al 2018] [Lindgren 2018] [D’Souza et al 2017] [Hochstetler 2017] [Tsang 2016] [Garg 2016] [Lambright 2015] [Cavolowsky 2015] [Garg 2014] [Klabukov et al 2014] [Pearce 2014] [Nickol and Frederic 2013] [Powell and Shyy 2013] [Bonvillian and Van Atta 2011] [Marshall 2010] [Garg 2010] [Jumper 2009] [Jackson et al 2009] [Spearman 2009] [Ewing 2009] [Springer 2008] [Littleton and Janzen 2008] [Fifty years of DARPA 2008] [Stroman 2008] [Jackson et al 2008] [Larson and Pakhomov 2008] [Stewart et al 2007] [Mavriplis et al 2007] [Defense Advanced Research Projects 2005] [Spearman 2005] [Hamrick 2004] [Spearman 2004] [Guerrero et al 2004] [Woodbury 2003] [Defense Science Board Washington Dc 2003] [Spearman 2003] [McCarty et al 2003] [Guerrero et al 2001] [Dommett and Wright 2001] [Schumacher and Zeh 2001] [Richardson et al 2001] [Gillard 1999] [Fernandez 1999] [Stephenson 1999] [Luker and Hutsell 1998] [Department Of Defense Washington Dc 1998] [Ambur et al 1997] [Brenner et al 1997] [Department Of Defense Washington Dc 1996] [Hetherington 1990] [Trimble 1988] [Levinson 1987] [Space Policy and Edwards 1987] [Minor and Shimer 1986] [Compton and Roland 1986] [Critchlow 1985] [Havelock and Bushnell 1985] [Bdm Corp McLean Va 1983] [Nagel and Shiner 1983] [Olstad 1981] [Meridian Corp Falls Church Va 1981] [Swenson 1980] [NASA’s Aeronautics Research and 1979] [Koppes and Anderson 1977] [Sorenson 1971] [Harper 1968] [Hodell and Rosner 1957] [Gustafson 1956] [Sanders and Callaghan 1956] [Johnsen and Ginsburg 1953] [Jackson 1953] [Kemper 1939] [Victory 1938] [Kemper 1930] [Report no. 300. The 1929] [National advisory committee for 1927] [Fernandez and Shockcor]
Designation and nomenclature
The literature on how military aerospace vehicles are designated and named, which is almost empty.
3 records. [Cowling 2012] [Appendix A Aircraft Nomenclature 1997] [US military aircraft designations]
The history and philosophy of engineering
Histories of aeronautics and aviation, and accounts of how engineering knowledge is made, which is the frame the first article took from the philosophy of engineering.
75 records. [Loftin 1985] [Henderson and Huff 2021] [Deng et al 2022] [Dussling 2015] [Padula and Gillian 2006] [Jackson et al 2004] [Braslow 1999] [Phillips 1998] [Portree 1998] [Spearman 1983] [A case history of 1981] [Spearman 1981] [Dollfus 1924] [de Syon 2026] [Ewer 2026] [Thomson 2025] [Sharipkhojaevic 2025] [Gopalan 2025] [El-Sayed 2024] [El-Sayed 2024] [El-Sayed 2024] [Morrison 2023] [De Rosa 2023] [Prunariu et al 2023] [Ishrat et al 2023] [History of Aircraft and 2022] [Li 2021] [Melzer 2020] [History of Supersonic Transport 2020] [Filburn 2019] [Northfield 2019] [Arendes 2017] [Motes 2016] [Beddoes et al 2016] [Gao et al 2015] [Pesoshin 2014] [Frezza et al 2013] [Dalamagkidis et al 2012] [Erickson 2010] [Vermaas 2009] [History of Aviation 2009] [Harsch 2009] [Paul and Pratt 2004] [Goff 1998] [Werrell and Peebles 1998] [Edmonds and Young 1996] [Flomenhoft 1994] [Sherwood and Stevens 1993] [Hollmann 1993] [Sweetman 1990] [Hansen 1989] [Davies et al 1989] [Davies 1989] [Bilstein and Horgan 1988] [Bilstein 1988] [Holubik 1988] [Langins et al 1987] [Pugsley 1987] [Crouch and Reinhold 1983] [Ehresman 1981] [Negaard 1980] [A Brief History of 1978] [Bramwell and Anoshchenko 1969] [Vicory 1968] [Rae 1961] [Green 1918] [Aerospace Fluid Power] [Aerospace Landing Gear] [Aviation History and UAS] [Aviation history and evolution] [Vértesy] [History of Commercial Aircraft] [History of the SAE] [Overview and History of] [Thomas]
The technical-report literature
The reports server, scientific and technical information policy, and grey literature, which is the literature of the series’ own sources.
17 records. [Nelson et al 1995] [Takahashi 2014] [Kennedy et al 1994] [Pinelli 1990] [Vezirov 2026] [Caprio et al 2022] [McCallum 2022] [Gray Literature Dissertations, Theses 2011] [Rabina 2010] [Grey Literature Dissertations, Theses 2009] [Richards 2008] [Glenn 2006] [Nelson and Maa 1996] [Hernon and Pinelli 1992] [Kuhn 1991] [Cotter 1990] [Popescu]
The Source Base
This article’s primary sources are the seventy articles that precede it. Each is read for a fixed set of facts, and each fact is taken from the article that states it, with its quotation. The 21 coding decisions made on top of the ledger carry quotations too. The register of allocations is the compilation Andreas Parsch publishes from data the Department of Defense has released, read in full as the 539 rows of the copy he last updated on 23 August 2026, with its officiality markup read at all three levels and its notes read for the sources of out-of-sequence numbers [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum]. Every register count in this article is taken from all 539 rows of that copy, with no cut-off at this article’s date, so the X-68A and X-76A rows are counted although neither was public on that date. The register lists designators allocated after 19 August 1998, the date of the official list of that year [DOD 4120.15-L, 1998], and the 2004 edition of the official list was read for whether it dates its research rows, which it does not [DOD 4120.15-L, 2004]. The compiler’s appendix of unmanned military X vehicles was read as a second source on crew [Parsch, Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles, Appendix 4], and his page of missing designations and his account of the allocation process as primaries on the anomalies and the procedure [Missing USAF and DOD Aircraft Designations] [Allocation of Official Aerospace Vehicle MDS Designations]. Eleven original papers of the statistical methods the article uses were read for their definitions, Kendall, Wilson, Fisher on the exact test, on contingency tables and on the Poisson dispersion test, Cochran, Woolf, Shannon, Pielou, Dunn and Fleiss with his colleagues. Six editions of the numbering rule, of 1962, 1994, 1997, 2005, 2014 and 2020, were read by earlier articles [X-67]. Four of them are cited here directly as well as through those articles [Air Force Regulation 66-11, 1962] [Air Force Joint Instruction 16-401, 1994] [Air Force Instruction 16-401, 2005] [Department of the Air Force Instruction 16-401, 2020], and the issues of 1997 and 2014 are cited through the X-67 article that read them, the issue of 2014 being the first to refuse skipped sequences.
The copy is later than this article’s date, and the register then current was smaller. The version current on 16 December 2025 was the compiler’s update of 11 August 2025, as archived on 10 December 2025 [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, as archived on 10 December 2025]. It held 526 rows and 29 research rows, of which 21 were official, 6 carried the compiler’s description cell, 2 were absent from released data and none was partly marked, and 11 of the research rows described an uncrewed vehicle. It held neither the X-68A row nor the X-76A row, so on this article’s date the public register showed the research series ending at the X-66A, with no passed 67 and no passed block from 69 to 75. Under that version the ordering test covers 21 numbers, whose 210 pairs are 207 concordant, 1 discordant and 2 tied, for a rank correlation of 0.981, and 16 of its 20 advances equal one, the others being the skips at the X-50A, X-53A and X-59A and the backfill at the X-49A, so the numbers it shows permanently skipped are the 52 and the 58. It held 66 Q rows, 8 of them out of sequence, without the YFQ-48A, and of the founding-year numbers only the YMV-75A and the F-47, then dated to March 2025. The single discordant pair, the recorded cause of every skip and the boundary of official wording at the X-60A are the same in both versions. The two later research rows first appeared between 15 January and 1 February 2026, as The Register Stopped Being the Government’s Voice sets out, and every statement here about the X-68A, the X-76A, the passing of 67 and of the block, the 539 rows, the 31 research rows and the 69 Q rows describes the later copy.
The research survey holds 4,710 records drawn from the Crossref bibliographic index and NASA’s Technical Reports Server, of which 46 are hand-chosen sources read for their abstracts and 4,664 are admitted on their titles. Of the records, 1,713 are report primaries, being 36.4 percent, by the identifier rule set out under The Definition of Primary. The median publication year is 1999, and the dated records run from 1918 to 2026.
The Definition of Primary
Primacy is a property of the document, and this survey derives it from the identifier. A record is a report primary when its address is on NASA’s Technical Reports Server or it carries a digital object identifier under the 10.21236 prefix, which Crossref registers for Defense Technical Information Center reports. Of the 1,713 report primaries, 1,518 are reports-server records and 195 are Defense Technical Information Center reports. The rule does not reach the journal and conference papers that report flight tests and analyses at first hand, so 36.4 percent is a lower bound on how much of the survey is first-hand. The 46 hand-chosen sources are a different selection, being records chosen by hand and read for their abstracts as well as their titles.
Thin Subjects
Four subjects that this article’s argument depends on have thin literatures. Each count below is the number of research records in this survey whose title carries at least one of the listed terms, with a hyphen or a slash read as a space. Where a row joins two groups of terms with the word together, a title must carry a term from each group.
| Subject | Title terms counted | Records |
|---|---|---|
| the designation and naming of aerospace vehicles | designation, designations, designator, designators, nomenclature, naming together with aircraft, aerospace, military, missile, missiles, vehicle, vehicles, rocket, rockets | 3 |
| the crew of a research aircraft | manned, unmanned, crewed, uncrewed, piloted, optionally piloted together with x plane, x planes, research aircraft, research airplane, research airplanes, research vehicle, research vehicles, experimental aircraft | 25 |
| the cost of research aircraft | cost, costs together with x plane, x planes, x 1, research aircraft, research airplane, research airplanes, experimental aircraft | 4 |
| the research aircraft as a class | inventory, history, histories, lessons learned, decade together with x plane, x planes, x vehicles, research aircraft, research airplane, research airplanes | 8 |
The designation is almost absent from its own literature. The 3 titles are the designation and nomenclature cluster discussed above, and none of them names the United States research designation sequence.
The crew of a research aircraft appears in the literature as a vehicle type rather than as a question. Of the 25 titles, one compares a crewed with an uncrewed X-plane [Lechniak 2017], 22 others name a remotely piloted or unmanned research vehicle as the vehicle under study, and the remaining 2 concern piloted vehicles. The crewed-share result above therefore rests on the series’ own record of its vehicles rather than on a published analysis.
The cost of research aircraft has a literature only from 2015. The 4 titles date from 2015 to 2018, and all of them are reports-server records.
The research aircraft as a class has one inventory. Of the 8 titles, 2 are editions of one inventory of the X designations, the later stopping at the X-50 [Jenkins et al 2003], and the other 6 concern single aircraft, a decade of X-vehicles or the structures of X-planes.
What the Survey Admits
A record is admitted only when a person reading its title finds it on this article’s subject, which is research aircraft as a class and the institutions and methods around them. The 46 hand-chosen sources are read for their abstracts as well. Two records with the same title, from the same authors and the same kind of source within two years, are one document deposited twice, and only one of them is kept.
Reviews of books, reference and definition entries and notices are not admitted, and a document deposited twice is admitted once. An authored encyclopedia article of more than two pages and a chapter of a textbook are research works and are kept, and a glossary of acronyms and terms is a set of definition entries and is not.
The excluded classes show where the vocabulary of designation and flight research collides with other fields. Designation and nomenclature systems for alloys, refrigerants, animals, chemicals and genes are excluded, as are X-ray sources such as Cygnus X-1 that are named in the form of a designation. Studies of the Edwards Air Force Base site rather than of the flight research done there are excluded, among them its groundwater, subsidence, seismicity, flora, archaeology and environmental assessments, and so is a biography of an air marshal who shares the base’s name. Reports admitted on the name of DARPA, the Air Force Research Laboratory, NASA or NACA whose work lies outside aerospace are excluded, among them work in natural language understanding, omics, network security, optics, astrobiology and ozone science and a genetics record on an allele named NACA, and so are technology demonstrators outside aerospace, such as unexploded ordnance clearance, road vehicles and command information systems. Experiments flown in space rather than through the atmosphere are excluded, among them heat pipes, spacecraft structures, thermal control, electric propulsion and satellites, and so are flight experiments in biology and materials science, the flight of birds and insects, and the ballistics of gun-launched ordnance. The phrase research aircraft is excluded where it names a platform for another science, such as an atmospheric or earth-science aircraft, because the X-planes research flight itself. Applications of uncrewed aircraft in other fields, such as forestry, surveying, mapping and environmental measurement, are excluded, and so are control-theory papers that use the planar vertical take-off aircraft as a benchmark model and prototyping in the sense of a tool for building components, software or simulation models. A laboratory’s component products, such as cryocoolers, lasers and solar cells, are excluded as a judgement of scope, since neither the article’s subject nor the cluster of sponsoring institutions, which holds the institutions and their research policy, extends to them. Correction, erratum and withdrawal notices, figures, tables and supplementary files of other works, subject indexes, and peer-review reports and decision letters are excluded because they are not works.
Doubtful records are kept where their subject is propulsion tied to a flight vehicle, experiments carried on launch vehicles, the civil operations of uncrewed aircraft, ground equipment for aircraft, or the sponsoring institutions’ own outreach and status records, since those subjects lie within the survey’s clusters on space access, flight research, the uncrewed turn, demonstrators and the sponsoring institutions. A few terse report titles whose subject the title does not settle are kept on the same terms.
Every research title has been read for relevance, so the off-topic share that remains is a matter of reading judgement. A reading of titles cannot show that a work is relevant in substance, so this is a statement about titles only.
Epistemic State
The Article’s Own Vantage Point
The article is dated 16 December 2025, and several of the facts it uses postdate that date. The X-68A and X-76A rows first appeared in the public register between 15 January and 1 February 2026 [X-76], DARPA announced the X-76 on 9 March 2026, and the reason for the number 76 is known only from that announcement. The register itself is read in its copy of 23 August 2026, and the counts of the version current on this article’s date are stated under The Source Base where they differ [Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, as archived on 10 December 2025]. Every statement about the X-68A, the skipped 67 and the block from 69 to 75 rests on that later copy, as the X-67, X-68 and X-69 through X-75 articles said for themselves. Every statement about the X-76’s number, and the founding-year class it completes, rests on documents published after this article’s date, as the X-76 and X-69 through X-75 articles said for themselves. The survey also reaches past the date, its latest works being of 2026, among them the vertical-flight studies, NASA’s presentation of RAVEN of May 2026 and the X-56A flutter workshop paper, which the review discusses as current literature for a reader of 2026 rather than as knowledge available on 16 December 2025.
Historical Fact
The allocation dates, designations, contractors and sponsors of the register’s rows, the register’s notes on the X-50A, XQ-58A, XQ-67A and the other out-of-sequence drone numbers, and DARPA’s statement of why it chose 76 are historical facts from primary documents. The facts about individual aircraft are the earlier articles’ and carry those articles’ sources.
Measured From the Ledger and the Register
The counts of outcomes, design crews, keystone classes, ground-comparison verdicts and reasons for not flying are measurements over the ledger. The relation’s totality, its two failures to be a function and its four failures of injectivity are measurements over the ledger and the register. The rank correlation, the pointer walk and the officiality split are measurements over the register. Each can be recomputed from the register and the earlier articles, and none depends on a judgement made after the counting.
Statistical Analysis
The index of dispersion and its chi-square test, the Wilson intervals, Fisher’s exact tests and the entropy of sponsorship are standard methods applied to the counts. Their assumptions are stated where they are used, the dispersion test assuming independent decades under a constant rate, and Fisher’s test conditioning on the table’s margins.
Classification, Stated as Such
The keystone class of each vehicle and the reason a vehicle did not fly are classifications made by one reader per article, and the purpose result rests on them. The crewed result depends on the articles’ statements and on a rule that a missile or rocket carries nobody, and it survives the most adverse assignment of the six vehicles whose crew is not stated.
Inference
That the clusters are institutional rather than budgetary is an inference from the coincidence of the second cluster with new sponsors, and no budget series was tested against the allocation dates. That a number announced as a message is a different object from a sequence index is an interpretation, and the evidence for it is the change in how the reason was published, from a compiler’s note in 2002 to a headline in 2026.
What the Record Does Not Settle
Who chose the numbers is known for three of them, the X-50, whose number was requested by DARPA or by Boeing depending on the account, the F-47, whose choice released Air Force public affairs correspondence attributes to General Allvin [X-69 through X-75], and the X-76, whose number DARPA announced. For the rest the record identifies the allocating office and not who asked for it. Whether the share of vehicles built to measure has fallen cannot be settled at the size of this series. A difference of the size observed would need about 131 vehicles in each period to be detected four times in five at the 5 percent level, against the 29 and 35 the series has.
Out of Scope
This article does not revisit any aircraft’s engineering, which the seventy articles before it did, and it does not resolve any question those articles left open. It does not survey the literature of any one aircraft’s subject. It does not treat the pre-1946 designation systems, foreign research aircraft, or the research aircraft that carried NASA rather than military designations, as the first article excluded them. It does not test the clusters against budget data, which would need a budget series the series never assembled. It does not make a documentary-trace count by designation, and a reader who wants that measurement will need to curate title matches by hand rather than by query.
Conclusion
The X designation began as a count of instruments, and it still mostly is one. Sixty-five of its seventy-six numbers went to a vehicle, the numbers the register can test kept their order in every case but one, and no fall in the share of vehicles built to measure something can be detected in the record. The first article’s model of the research aircraft as an instrument describes about two fifths of the X vehicles across the whole series, and the record cannot show that it describes fewer of them now than it did in the 1950s.
What changed is who is aboard, who pays, who can read the description, and how the number is chosen. Of the X vehicles whose crew is recorded, seven in ten carried a pilot before 1990, and nearly every aircraft among them did, and since 1990 just over one in four has. The sponsors went from the Air Force and NACA to a spread of agencies and laboratories. The register stopped carrying the official description of each research aircraft after the X-60. And the number went from being assigned to being chosen, first quietly in 2002 for a pun on fifty-fifty, then openly for 1776, allocated in 2025 and announced in March 2026 by an agency presenting its choice as the news.
The series ends at a test the X-69 through X-75 article set [X-69 through X-75]. The next research designation is the X-69A if the X-49 precedent governs, since a passed number was assigned to the next request in 2003, and the X-77A if the rule of 2014 and 2020 governs, since it defines the next number from the last approved one [X-67]. Whichever it is will show whether the X-76 was a skip or a new ceiling, and so whether the designation is still a count with a celebration in it, or has become a sequence of chosen symbols. Seventy-one articles ago this series opened by saying that a research aircraft is a machine built to measure one thing. The designation that marks it turned out to measure something too, the institutions that kept it.
References
Reference
- Air Force Instruction 16-401, Army Regulation 70-50 and NAVAIRINST 13100.16, Designating and Naming Defense Military Aerospace Vehicles, 14 April 2005
- Air Force Joint Instruction 16-401, Designating and Naming Defense Military Aerospace Vehicles, 9 September 1994
- Air Force public affairs correspondence on the F-47, March 2025, released under the Freedom of Information Act
- Air Force Regulation 66-11, Army Regulation 700-26 and Bureau of Naval Weapons Instruction 13100.7, Designating, Redesignating, and Naming Military Aircraft, 18 September 1962
- Air Force Research Laboratory, ARISE and Fly, World’s First Modular Aerospike Rocket Engine Flight Demonstration, fact sheet
- Air Force Reserve Command, Air Force Awards Contract for Next Generation Air Dominance Platform, F-47, 21 March 2025
- Bell, Bell Completes Critical Design Review on DARPA SPRINT X-Plane Program, Receives Official X-Plane Designation, 9 March 2026
- Cochran, Some Methods for Strengthening the Common Chi-Square Tests, Biometrics 10, 1954
- DARPA, Announcing DARPA’s Newest X-Plane, X-76, 9 March 2026
- Department of the Air Force Instruction 16-401, Designating and Naming Defense Military Aerospace Vehicles, 3 November 2020
- DoD 4120.15-L, Model Designation of Military Aerospace Vehicles, 12 May 2004 incorporating Change 1 of 31 August 2018, as archived
- DoD 4120.15-L, Model Designation of Military Aerospace Vehicles, 19 August 1998
- Dunn, Multiple Comparisons Among Means, Journal of the American Statistical Association 56, 1961
- Fisher, On the Interpretation of Chi-Square from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85, 1922
- Fisher, The Logic of Inductive Inference, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 98, 1935
- Fisher, The Significance of Deviations from Expectation in a Poisson Series, Biometrics 6, 1950
- Fleiss, Tytun and Ury, A Simple Approximation for Calculating Sample Sizes for Comparing Independent Proportions, Biometrics 36, 1980
- Kendall, A New Measure of Rank Correlation, Biometrika 30, 1938
- NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Active Aeroelastic Wing Flight Research, fact sheet FS-2005-03-061 DFRC
- National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Public Law 85-568, as unamended, NASA History Office copy
- Parsch, Allocation of Official Aerospace Vehicle MDS Designations
- Parsch, Bell RTV-A-4/X-9 Shrike, Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles, Appendix 1
- Parsch, Boeing X-50 Dragonfly, Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles, Appendix 4
- Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, MDS Designators Allocated After 19 August 1998
- Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, as archived on 1 February 2026
- Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, as archived on 10 December 2025
- Parsch, DOD 4120.15-L Addendum, as archived on 15 January 2026
- Parsch, Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles, Appendix 4, Undesignated Vehicles, including the unmanned military X-planes
- Parsch, Missing USAF and DOD Aircraft Designations
- Parsch, North American RTV-A-5/X-10, Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles, Appendix 1
- Pielou, The Measurement of Diversity in Different Types of Biological Collections, Journal of Theoretical Biology 13, 1966
- Program Executive Office Aviation, Army designates MV-75 as mission design series for Future Long Range Assault Aircraft, 27 May 2025
- Shannon, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal 27, 1948
- USAspending, the federal award record
- Wilson, Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference, Journal of the American Statistical Association 22, 1927
- Woolf, On Estimating the Relation Between Blood Group and Disease, Annals of Human Genetics 19, 1955
Research
- A Brief History of 1978
- A case history of 1981
- A Preliminary Investigation of 1976
- A Preliminary Study of 1961
- A Typical Avionics Integration 2010
- Aagren et al 2025
- Aarons et al 2011
- Abate and Klomfass 2005
- Abdelrahman et al 2009
- Abdulrahim 2019
- Abdulrahim 2026
- Abe et al 2001
- Abercrombie 1979
- Abou-Kebeh et al 2025
- Abou-Kebeh LLano et al 2024
- Abrahamm and Valsa 2018
- Abrego et al 2001
- Abushmeis et al 2021
- Acree and Hoffman 2004
- Acree et al 1997
- Adair and McRoberts 1984
- Adamczak and Bolender 2015
- Adams 1983
- Adams 1983
- Adams 1988
- Adams and Graves 1983
- Adams et al 1973
- Adams et al 1976
- Adarkar and Hall 1969
- Addressing Challenges in Defense 2023
- Adelgren et al 2004
- Adelt 1981
- Adeyemi et al 2026
- Adibhatla et al 2018
- Adkins and Armstrong 1965
- Adolph 1978
- Adolph 1981
- Advanced Hypersonic Spaceplane Multi-Role 2004
- Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development 1984
- Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development 1997
- Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development 1999
- Aero-Space Plane Flexible Access 1991
- Aerospace - Vehicle Management
- Aerospace Fluid Power
- Aerospace Landing Gear
- Aerothermodynamic design of a 1993
- Africano 1947
- Agar 1982
- Agarwal et al 1992
- Aggarwal 2003
- Aggarwal et al 2010
- Ahad and Graham 2007
- Ahlefeldt and Quest 2014
- Ahuja and Hartfield 2009
- AI-Based Framework for Forecasting 2025
- Aiken 1977
- Aiken et al 1977
- Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards Afb Ca 1970
- Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards Afb Ca 1974
- Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards Afb Ca 1974
- Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards Afb Ca 2002
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1962
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1962
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1962
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1967
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1967
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1979
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1990
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1990
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1991
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1991
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1992
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1992
- Air Force Test Pilot School Edwards Afb Ca 1993
- Aircraft and Flight Test 2021
- Aircraft and Rotorcraft System 2008
- Aircraft and Rotorcraft System 2016
- Airfoil static-pressure thrust 1990
- Airworthiness of unmanned aircraft 2018
- Akagi et al 2024
- Akaryildiz et al 2024
- Aksu 2014
- Al Bakri
- Al Fatih et al 2021
- AL-Bakri and Kluever 2017
- Alaverdi and Paris 2001
- Albers and Zuk 1988
- Albers and Zuk 1990
- Albers and Zuk 1992
- Albion et al 1973
- Aleisa et al 2023
- Aleisa et al 2023
- Alexander 1979
- Alexander and Alieh 2026
- Alexander et al 1979
- Alexander et al 1986
- Alexander et al 2026
- Alford and Harris 1966
- Alford and Knarr 1999
- Alford and Luoma 1960
- Alford et al 1963
- Alich and Castillo 2007
- Allan 1979
- Allee and Knoepfel 2004
- Allen 1958
- Allen et al 1994
- Alley 1983
- Alliney et al 2025
- Allongue and Krysinski 1990
- Almeida 2011
- Alscher et al 1966
- Altitude Wind Tunnel at 2008
- Altman 1965
- Alunno et al 2026
- Alvord et al 2024
- Ambur et al 1997
- Ament et al 2019
- American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1992
- Amin and Hollweger 1983
- An et al 2025
- Analysis of Gust-Response Flight-Test 1988
- Ananda et al 2017
- Ananthasayanam et al 2002
- Ananyev 2019
- Anderson 1953
- Anderson 1960
- Anderson 1960
- Anderson 1966
- Anderson 1976
- Anderson 1977
- Anderson 1981
- Anderson 1981
- Anderson 1983
- Anderson 1987
- Anderson 1990
- Anderson 1994
- Anderson 1995
- Anderson 2000
- Anderson 2001
- Anderson and Lebacqz 1997
- Anderson and Schroers 1972
- Anderson and Stephenson 1965
- Anderson and Vincent 1985
- Anderson et al 1963
- Anderson et al 1967
- Anderson et al 1973
- Anderson et al 1983
- Anderson et al 2012
- Andreeva-Mori et al 2022
- Andreeva-Mori et al 2024
- Andrew et al 1966
- Andrews 1998
- Andrews and Gordon 1981
- Andrews and Mackley 1976
- Andrews and Mackley 1993
- Andrews and Mackley 1994
- Andrews and Rogers 1968
- Andrianatos
- Angell et al 2020
- Annati and Smyth 1991
- Antonenko and Ebeling 1989
- Apkarian 2018
- Appendix A Aircraft Nomenclature 1997
- Appendix F Flight Test 1999
- Appendix HAVE BLUE Technology 1998
- Appich et al 1980
- Appleton et al 2021
- Application of CFD to 1993
- Application of Fluidic Thrust 2024
- Arabshahi 2021
- Arendes 2017
- Arent and Falatko 1992
- Argrow 2016
- Arif and Sasongko 2021
- Armstrong 1977
- Armstrong et al 1962
- Arnold 1968
- Arnold 1981
- Arnold and Deiwert 1997
- Arora and Ananthasayanam 2003
- Arora et al 2003
- Arora et al 2022
- Arrabito et al 2021
- Arrington and Woods 1972
- Arteaga et al 2018
- Arteaga et al 2023
- Arteaga et al 2024
- Arteaga et al 2024
- Arterburn et al 2002
- Arévalo Nogales 2020
- Ashenden 1993
- Ashenden 1995
- Asher 1969
- Asher et al 2013
- Ashford 1993
- Ashleman and Kavdahl 1972
- Ashokkumar 2023
- Asim et al 2022
- Asis Mishra 2026
- Aslan and Erkin 2023
- Aslan and Oktay 2023
- Asper and Simmons 2022
- Asselin 2021
- Assessment to Enhance Air 2013
- Atencio 1975
- Atencio and Soderman 1973
- Atkins 2008
- Aujogue
- Aulehla and Kissel 1981
- Ausserer and Harmon 2012
- Austin
- Austin et al 1967
- Aviation history and evolution
- Aviation History and UAS
- Aweiss et al 2019
- Axten et al 2024
- Ayers 1981
- Ayers 1982
- Ayers 1990
- Azzaro Bradea et al 2026
- Bach 1980
- Bach and McNally 1989
- Bachelder and Klyde 2003
- Bachelder et al 2004
- Bachelder et al 2011
- Bachmaier and Anderson 2021
- Baer-Riedhart 1981
- Bagan 1967
- Bageshwar 2017
- Baggett et al 2021
- Bahm et al 2005
- Bai 2025
- Bai and Chen 2025
- Bailey 1977
- Bailey and Brownson 1979
- Bailey et al 1983
- Bailey et al 2005
- Baillie 1990
- Bajpai et al 2025
- Baker 1953
- Baker 1971
- Baker et al 2004
- Bakirci and Ozer 2022
- Bakos et al 1996
- Balachandran et al 2023
- Balakin et al 2018
- Balakumar and Hamilton 2001
- Balcan et al 2026
- Baldwin 2007
- Balke 1970
- Ball et al 1997
- Baltes and Spitz 2002
- Bamber 1961
- Banfield et al 2016
- Banks 2009
- Banks 2011
- Banks 2012
- Banks and Fisher 2006
- Banks et al 2011
- Banner and Kuhl 1965
- Banner et al 1962
- Banner et al 1964
- Banu et al 2017
- Baran et al 2014
- Barker 1966
- Barker et al 1967
- Barnes et al 1976
- Barnes et al 1979
- Barret 1998
- Barret 1999
- Barrett et al 1983
- Barshi et al 2016
- Bartholomeusz and Geddes 2002
- Bartlett 1975
- Bartlett and Harris 1974
- Bartlett and Re 1972
- Bartlett and Sangiorgio 1975
- Bartlett et al 1973
- Bartlett et al 1984
- Bartolome Calvo and Eggers 2011
- Basappa and Jategaonkar 2004
- Basciano 1998
- Baseman 1984
- Basnight et al 2025
- Bass and Harding 1990
- Bath et al 2021
- Bath et al 2022
- Bath et al 2023
- Batson et al 1981
- Batterson and Klein 1984
- Batterson and Klein 1989
- Batterson and Morelli 1996
- Batterton and Blaha 1987
- Bauer 1987
- Bauer 2007
- Bauer 2008
- Bauer 2009
- Bauer 2026
- Bauer et al 2011
- Bauersfeld and Ducard 2020
- Baumann 2006
- Baumann 2007
- Baumann and Gal-Or 1992
- Baumann et al 2008
- Baumann et al 2013
- Baumgartner 1997
- Baumgartner and Elvin 1995
- Baumgartner et al 1979
- Bayer 1998
- Bayoğlu et al 2016
- Bdm Corp McLean Va 1983
- Beachler and Kachel 1972
- Bean and Lee 1994
- Bean and Lee 1995
- Beard and Foley 1982
- Beattie 1975
- Beaty et al 2008
- Beddoes et al 2016
- Bedos and Anderson 1999
- Bedrossian et al 2000
- Beebe 1968
- Beeler 1961
- Beeler 1965
- Beeler and Toll 1961
- Beh et al 2018
- Behr et al 2001
- Bekar et al 2025
- Bell Aerospace Co Buffalo Ny 1970
- Bell Textron Inc. 2021
- Belte and Ranaudo 1989
- Belák and Hromčík 2023
- Bement 1978
- Bender 1969
- Benders et al 2020
- Bennett and Abel 1981
- Bennett and Lawson 2023
- Benson et al 1978
- Benson et al 2023
- Bentley 2009
- Bentley 2009
- Bentley 2009
- Benyamen et al 2024
- Beppu et al 1966
- Berend and Talbot 2006
- Berens and Bissinger 1998
- Berger et al 2022
- Berkes 1992
- Bernardi and Merrett 2024
- Berra et al 2017
- Berridge et al 2018
- Berridge et al 2019
- Berrigan et al 2020
- Berry 1967
- Berry and Horvath 2007
- Berry et al 1997
- Berry et al 1998
- Berry et al 2001
- Berry et al 2002
- Berry et al 2011
- Berry et al 2016
- Berteau et al 2011
- Bertelrud et al 1992
- Bertelrud et al 1999
- Bertelrud et al 2000
- Berton et al 2014
- Bertrand-Noël et al 2022
- Betin 1991
- Bevan et al 2015
- Bevan et al 2017
- Bever 1984
- Bever 1991
- Bever 1991
- Bever 1992
- Bevilaqua et al 2007
- Beyers and Ericsson 1999
- Beyers et al 1997
- Bhamidipati et al 2024
- Bhamidipati et al 2024
- Bhardwaj and Holzapfel 2025
- Bi and Haas 2002
- Bi et al 2005
- Bidwell 2007
- Bierig et al 2017
- Biggers et al 1966
- Biggi et al 2024
- Biggs et al 2014
- Bikle and McCollom 1965
- Bilstein 1988
- Bilstein 1989
- Bilstein and Horgan 1988
- Bilstein and Wallace 1998
- Bin 2014
- Bingyan et al 2015
- Binkley and Mackall 1992
- Birckelbaw and Nelson 1992
- Birkeland and Meuser 1999
- Bishop 2019
- Biswas et al 2005
- Bizzarri and Hendrick 2003
- Bjorkman et al 1986
- Black 1969
- Blackstock and Theobalds 2005
- Blackwell and Millott 2008
- Blades and Redgrave 2000
- Blaha 1969
- Blair 1972
- Blair et al 2008
- Blakely and Nielsen 2025
- Blanchard 1989
- Bland and Young 1961
- Bland et al 1976
- Blankson and Pyle 1993
- Bleimeyer 1981
- Blette et al 2024
- Blevins et al 2022
- Bloomfield 1959
- Blosser 1997
- Bock 1976
- Bode et al 1978
- Bodson and Athans 1985
- Boeing Co Morton Pa Vertol Div 1956
- Boeing to use X-43A 2005
- Bogdonoff 1999
- Boger et al 1989
- Bogue 1993
- Bohn-Meyer et al 2004
- Bohn-Meyer et al 2005
- Boirun 1978
- Boisseau 1959
- Bolender and Doman 2005
- Boles and Milligan 2013
- Bolt 1981
- Bolten et al 2008
- Bomben et al 2006
- Bondi and Robinson 1971
- Bonnema and Lokos 1989
- Bonnema and Smith 1988
- Bonvillian and Van Atta 2011
- Bookstaber 2000
- Boone Bonvillian 2020
- Borek and Pool 1994
- Borer 2024
- Borer et al 2016
- Borer et al 2019
- Borer et al 2024
- Borer et al 2024
- Borg et al 2025
- Borg et al 2025
- Borst 1965
- Borst 1978
- Borst 1990
- Bose et al 2016
- Bosworth 2006
- Bosworth 2007
- Bosworth 2010
- Bosworth 2012
- Bosworth and West 1986
- Boudreau 2005
- Bouman 1962
- Bouslog et al 1998
- Bouwer and Ignatuk 2025
- Bouwer and Ignatuk 2025
- Bouwer and Kaiser 2019
- Bovais and Davidson 1994
- Bovais et al 1992
- Bowcutt 1992
- Bowcutt and Haney 1995
- Bowers 2015
- Bowers and Sandlin 1984
- Bowers and Sim 1984
- Bowers et al 2006
- Bowers et al 2008
- Bowers et al 2011
- Bowles 1992
- Bowman 1955
- Bowman 1955
- Bowman 1955
- Bowman 1956
- Bowman 1957
- Bowman et al 1978
- Boyce and Paull 2001
- Boyce et al 2003
- Boyden 1974
- Boyden and McKinney 1968
- Boyer 1964
- Bozov 2023
- Brad Seanor 2006
- Bradfield 1981
- Bradley and Buchholz 1972
- Bradley et al 1981
- Bradley et al 1982
- Brahmachary and Ogawa 2021
- Brajou and Ricco 2005
- Bramwell and Anoshchenko 1969
- Brandon 2024
- Brandon et al 1995
- Brandon et al 2001
- Brandon et al 2008
- Brant and Hage 1964
- Braslow 1966
- Braslow 1999
- Braslow 1999
- Bratt 1965
- Brauckmann 1998
- Brennan and McDaniel 1994
- Brenner 2007
- Brenner et al 1997
- Brenner et al 1997
- Bretmersky et al 2014
- Brewer 1966
- Brewer 2017
- Bridges 2007
- Brieger et al 1987
- Brigden and Roman 1966
- Brinda et al 2005
- Brinker 2004
- Brinker and Barker 2005
- British Research Aircraft 1962
- Brock and Franke 2004
- Brogan et al 1961
- Bromberg and Hansen 1965
- Bronz and Hattenberger 2016
- Brooks 1971
- Brooks 1986
- Brooks and Mackall 1984
- Broughton 1978
- Brown 1944
- Brown 1965
- Brown 1981
- Brown 2009
- Brown 2009
- Brown 2009
- Brown 2010
- Brown 2013
- Brown and Boyce 2012
- Brown and Bradley 1981
- Brown and Duhon 1965
- Brown and Fisher 1968
- Brown and Olds 2005
- Brown and Schaefer 2013
- Brown and Smith 1999
- Brown et al 2011
- Brown et al 2012
- Brown et al 2015
- Bruce et al 1986
- Bruce et al 1998
- Bruening et al 2001
- Brumley and Perich 2022
- Bruner 2002
- Brunner et al 1966
- Bruno 2023
- Brunson and Rais-Rohani 1996
- Bryan 1961
- Bryant 1948
- Bryant and Hodge 1975
- Bryant et al 1984
- Bryson et al 1968
- Bryson et al 1970
- Bucharles et al 1990
- Bucknell et al 1990
- Budd et al 1993
- Buehrle et al 2010
- Buehrle et al 2010
- Buehrle et al 2010
- Bufalino 1995
- Buffo 1990
- Bugg and Sleeman 1967
- Bui et al 2000
- Bull and Bridges 1981
- Bull and Bridges 1983
- Bulmer 1974
- Bulusu et al 2024
- Bumbaugh et al 2019
- Bunge et al 2015
- Buning et al 2000
- Buoni and Howell 2008
- Burbank and Hodge 1960
- Burcham and Burken 1994
- Burcham and Ray 1987
- Burcham et al 1981
- Burcham et al 1986
- Burcham et al 1992
- Burcham et al 1993
- Burcham et al 1994
- Burcham et al 1995
- Burcham et al 1995
- Burcham et al 1997
- Burcham et al 1997
- Burke 1983
- Burke and Basso 1965
- Burke and Ferris 1981
- Burken et al 1996
- Burken et al 1999
- Burkhardt et al 1999
- Burks 1981
- Burleigh 1999
- Burley 1979
- Burnett 2002
- Burns 1970
- Burns 1992
- Burton and Bischoff 1976
- Bushey
- Bushnell 1997
- Bushnell 2006
- Buss and Nicholson 1971
- Butcher and McKay 1984
- Butler and Thomas 1964
- Butler et al 2026
- Butter et al 1996
- Byrdsong and Brooks 1980
- Byrdsong and Brooks 1983
- Byrdsong and Hallissy 1979
- Byrnes et al 1974
- Böhrk 2015
- C. and White 2006
- Cabarbaye
- Cacciatore et al 2023
- Cady and Olsen 1996
- Caetano et al 2017
- Cahill and Connor 1979
- Cain and Walton 2003
- Calderon Ochoa et al 2026
- Caldwell and Lafavor 1980
- Calhoun 2000
- Calise and Kramer 1982
- Calise and Rysdyk 1998
- Calise et al 1997
- Callender et al 2007
- Callies and Wimmer 2000
- Camacho 1991
- Campbell 1959
- Campbell 1963
- Campbell 1964
- Campbell 1965
- Campbell 1966
- Campbell 1967
- Campbell 1991
- Campbell 2002
- Campbell and Kresge 2003
- Campbell and LaFREY 1983
- Campbell and Quinn 1974
- Campbell et al 1997
- Campbell et al 2009
- Campbell et al 2009
- Candler 2010
- Candler and Nompelis 2002
- Canter and Groves 1994
- Cao et al 2017
- Caplin
- Capone 1975
- Capra et al 2004
- Caprio et al 2022
- Carico 1998
- Carlson 1964
- Carlson and Papachristos 2021
- Carlson and Papachristos 2024
- Carlson and Zhao 2002
- Carlson and Zhao 2003
- Carlson and Zhao 2004
- Carnahan et al 1975
- Carpenter and Cizmas 2020
- Carpenter et al 2018
- Carpenter et al 2025
- Carroll 2025
- Carter 1988
- Carter 1997
- Carter and Nagy 1996
- Carter and Sims 1981
- Carter and Stephenson 1999
- Carter et al 2013
- Castner 2022
- Castner 2022
- Castner et al 2018
- Castrillo et al 2017
- Cattolica et al 1992
- Cavolowsky 2015
- Cazes et al 2011
- Cenkci 1991
- Cenko 1992
- Cenko 1994
- Cenko 1999
- Cenko et al 1995
- Cenko et al 2008
- CFD optimization and test 1994
- Chacon et al
- Chalk 2007
- Chamberlin and Blaha 1973
- Chambers 1971
- Chambers 1991
- Chambers 2000
- Chambers and Grafton 1966
- Chambers and Grafton 1968
- Chambers and Iliff 1981
- Chamitoff 1995
- Chan 2011
- Chan 2018
- Chana 2002
- Chance Vought Corp Dallas Tx 1979
- Chandler and Chisholm 1993
- Chang et al 2022
- Chao et al 2017
- Chapman 1991
- Chapman and Kirk 1974
- Chase
- Chase 1964
- Chase 1979
- Chase and McDonald 2014
- Chase and McKinney 2005
- Chase and Rust 1980
- Chaurasia and Mohindru 2021
- Chavagnac 2003
- Chavagnac et al 2013
- Chawla et al 2010
- Che 2025
- Chedrik et al 2004
- Chen 2017
- Chen and Berry 2010
- Chen and Chen 2021
- Chen and Guo 2025
- Chen and Pérez-Arancibia 2024
- Chen and Shin 2012
- Chen and Valasek 1999
- Chen et al 1974
- Chen et al 1998
- Chen et al 2007
- Chen et al 2019
- Chen et al 2025
- Cheney 1988
- Cheney and Holzer 1987
- Cheng 1992
- Cheng et al 2021
- Chernyi and Gonor 1973
- Cheung et al 2026
- Chiba et al 2007
- Chiba et al 2008
- Chiba et al 2012
- Chiesa et al 2005
- Childers et al 2001
- Childs 1953
- Chin 1970
- Chin et al 1987
- Chinvorarat et al 2024
- Cho and Nagati 1995
- Cho et al 1995
- ChoHee Kim et al 2021
- Choi and Kim 2010
- Choi et al 2010
- Choi et al 2010
- Choi et al 2025
- Choi et al 2026
- Chopra and Datta 2003
- Chowdhary and Jategaonkar 2006
- Chowdhary and Jategaonkar 2010
- Chowdhary and Johnson 2008
- Chowdhary and Johnson 2009
- Chowdhury and Keshmiri 2022
- Chrispin 1988
- Christensen and Gordon 1998
- Christensen et al 1999
- Christoffel et al 2020
- Chu et al 1983
- Chung and Hutchinson 2001
- Churchward et al 1998
- Chyu et al 1978
- Cicala and Miele 1956
- Cicolani and Meyer 1975
- Cicolani et al 2001
- Clapp 1995
- Clark 1980
- Clark 1982
- Clark and Richie 1977
- Clark et al 2002
- Clarke and Randall 1997
- Clarke and Roskam 1982
- Clarke et al 1973
- Clarke et al 1982
- Clarke et al 2005
- Clarke et al 2017
- Clarke et al 2018
- Classification for Unmanned Aircraft
- Cleary 1987
- Cleary 1989
- Cleary 1990
- Cleary and Gray 1947
- Cleary and Gray 1948
- Clemmons 1999
- Cliatt et al 2014
- Coakley
- Coble et al 2014
- Cobleigh 1998
- Cobleigh 2002
- Cobleigh 2008
- Cobleigh 2023
- Cobleigh 2024
- Cochrane and Boissevain 1978
- Cochrane and Graham 1971
- Cochrane et al 1981
- Cochrane et al 1982
- Cocking and Bryce 1975
- Cockrell and Doherr 1981
- Cockrell et al 2005
- Cohen 1970
- Cohen and Le 1991
- Coker et al 1978
- Cole 1946
- Cole and England 1967
- Cole et al 1980
- Colella et al 2012
- Colgren and Martin 2000
- Collins 2016
- Collins et al 1970
- Colombi et al 2017
- Combs 1976
- Combs 1977
- Combs 1977
- Comer et al 2024
- Comer et al 2026
- Comer et al 2026
- Communications Flight Test 2010
- Comparison of Aircraft Noise 1975
- Compton and Roland 1986
- Condon 1975
- Condon and Letchworth 1976
- Conference on the progress 1956
- Conference on V/Stol Aircraft 1960
- Conklin 1981
- Conner et al 2000
- Connors and Swaim 1968
- Continuing to push the 2006
- Conway 2002
- Cook 1981
- Cook 1995
- Cook 1995
- Cook 1996
- Cook 2024
- Cook and Hickey 1965
- Cook and Hickey 1967
- Cook and Hickey 1976
- Cook and Hueter 2003
- Cook and King 2018
- Cook and Whittley 1975
- Cook and Whittley 1976
- Cooke 1980
- Cooke 1980
- Cooke and Engle 2016
- Cooksey et al 1964
- Coombe 1970
- Coons 1986
- Cooper et al 2009
- Corban et al 2001
- Corda 2025
- Corda et al 1998
- Corda et al 2000
- Corda et al 2001
- Cordero et al 2014
- Cordes and Hertzfeld 1997
- Corpening 2004
- Cosenito 2010
- Cosentino 2006
- Cosentino 2007
- Cosentino 2007
- Cosentino 2008
- Cosentino 2008
- Cosentino 2009
- Cosentino et al 1997
- Cosgrove et al 1968
- Coskun and Genc 2021
- Costa and Arteaga 2011
- Costa et al 2015
- Costello et al 2021
- Cotter 1990
- Cotting and Burken 1999
- Cotting and Burken 2001
- Cotting et al 2001
- Cotton 1974
- Couch and Morris 1968
- Coue 2003
- Courtin et al 2020
- Courtland 2010
- Covington 1966
- Coward and Hinz 1956
- Cowling 2011
- Cowling 2012
- Cox 2008
- Cox 2009
- Cox et al 1995
- Cox et al 2009
- Cox et al 2012
- Crafa and Reed 1980
- Craig and Reich 1981
- Creagh et al 2012
- Creating Hypersonic Flow in 2019
- Critchlow 1985
- Crites et al 1992
- Croom 1977
- Croom et al 1988
- Croom et al 2000
- Cross 1984
- Cross 1992
- Cross and Watts 1984
- Crouch 1999
- Crouch and Reinhold 1983
- Crounse 2005
- Crowder 2018
- Crowley 1999
- Cruz and Green 2019
- Cruz and Ware 1992
- Cruz and Ware 1995
- Cruz et al 1969
- Cruz et al 1989
- Cuda 2022
- Cui et al 2009
- Cui et al 2022
- Culbertson 2026
- Culp and Cooke 1982
- Cumming and Kim 2018
- Cumming et al 2013
- Cumming et al 2014
- Cumming et al 2016
- Cumming et al 2017
- Cummings and Schütte 2012
- Cummings et al 2003
- Cummings et al 2008
- Cunningham 1985
- Cunningham et al 2008
- Curry and Batterson 2000
- Curry and Sim 1982
- Curry and Sim 1984
- Curry et al 1992
- Curry et al 2002
- Curtiss 1970
- Curtiss 1971
- Cusick and Kontis 2019
- Cusimano and Johnson 1994
- Cutright and Braasch
- Cvrlje et al 1999
- Czech et al 2021
- Czysz and Murthy 1996
- D’Angelo et al 1999
- D’Souza et al 2017
- Dadd et al 2006
- Daffer and Rogers 1973
- Daforno 1982
- Dahlgren et al 2016
- Daidzic 2016
- Dalamagkidis et al 2012
- Dalle et al 2010
- Dalle et al 2012
- Damman 1976
- Dana 1968
- Dana 1987
- Dana 1993
- Dana and Gentry 1970
- Dana et al 1969
- Danehy et al 2010
- Daniel and Ramusat 2005
- Daniel et al 2004
- Danis
- Danowsky et al 2012
- Dantsker 2024
- Dantsker 2024
- Dantsker and Mancuso 2019
- Dantsker and Selig 2015
- Dantsker et al 2020
- Dantsker et al 2022
- Dantsker et al 2023
- Dantsker et al 2023
- Dantsker et al 2025
- Darcy 1998
- Darcy 2002
- Darcy and Johnson 2000
- Darcy and Strangways 1999
- Darling et al 1970
- Datta et al 2020
- Daud Filho et al 2026
- Daugherty 1979
- Davidson 2004
- Davidson et al 1999
- Davidson et al 2003
- Davies 1989
- Davies 2015
- Davies et al 1989
- Davis 1981
- Davis 1989
- Davis 1995
- Davis 2008
- Davis 2008
- Davis 2010
- Davis 2011
- Davis and Grindle 2007
- Davis and Mertens 1958
- Davis and Robinson 2008
- Davis and White 2006
- Davis and White 2008
- Davis et al 2007
- Davy et al 1985
- Dawei and Baoan 2014
- Dawson and Maxwell 2005
- Day 1953
- Day 1961
- Day 1965
- Day and Reisert 1959
- Day and Stillwell 1952
- Dayman 1962
- Dayman 1964
- Dayman 1971
- De Angelis and Tang 1969
- De Crombrugghe
- De Giorgis et al 1997
- De Giorgis et al 1999
- De Jesus Mota and Botez 2009
- de Mûelenaere and Alonso 2018
- De Rosa 2023
- de Syon 2026
- Deal et al 1967
- Deal et al 1981
- Deam 1984
- Deangelis 1991
- Deangelis and Anderson 1992
- DeBusk et al 2009
- Decadal Survey of Civil 2006
- Deckert 1977
- Deckert 1979
- Deckert 1981
- Deckert and Evans 1972
- Deckert and Hickey 1970
- Deckert and Holzhauser 1973
- Deckert and Rolls 1974
- Deepa and Gupta 2023
- Deepak and Singh 2016
- Deepak et al 2006
- Deepak et al 2008
- Deere et al 2022
- Deeter et al
- Deets and Brown 1986
- Deets and Edwards 1974
- Defense Acquisition in Russia 2021
- Defense Acquisition Univ Ft Belvoir Va 2007
- Defense Acquisition Univ Ft Belvoir Va 2007
- Defense Acquisition Univ Ft Belvoir Va 2010
- Defense Acquisition Univ Ft Belvoir Va 2012
- Defense Advanced Research Projects 2005
- Defense Science Board Washington Dc 1979
- Defense Science Board Washington Dc 1993
- Defense Science Board Washington Dc 2003
- Dehennis 2025
- Dehoff et al 1977
- Deiler 2016
- Del Frate and Saltzman 1992
- Del Frate and Zuniga 1990
- Del Frate et al 1990
- del Val and Das 2026
- Delany and Kauffman 1945
- DeLaurentis 2009
- DelFrate 2007
- DelFrate 2008
- DelFrate and Deets 1994
- Delfrate et al 1990
- Delgado et al 2026
- Demers et al 1975
- Demers et al 1975
- Demidovich 2017
- Demo 1986
- Dempster and Arnold 1969
- Denardo and Canning 1952
- Dendy and Tribken 1968
- Denegri 2000
- Deng and Yuan 2015
- Deng et al 2022
- Deng et al 2024
- Denham and Owens 2016
- Denham et al 2023
- Deora et al 2023
- Department of Defense Acquisition 2022
- Department Of Defense Washington Dc 1996
- Department Of Defense Washington Dc 1998
- Der Kiureghian 2001
- Deshmukh et al 2024
- Design and Development Autonomous 2020
- Design and Fluid Flow 2015
- Design validation and verification 2026
- Desjardins et al 1988
- Detore and Gaffey 1969
- Devalla et al 2015
- Development of a Continuous 2012
- Development of the navigation 2020
- Development of the Shock 1962
- Development Status and Trend 2022
- Dhayalan et al 2018
- Di Clemente et al 2007
- Di Francesco and Mattei 2016
- Diamond 1988
- Dianics et al 2013
- Dianics et al 2015
- Dias 2023
- Dicarlo et al 1966
- Dicarlo et al 1992
- DiCarlo et al 1994
- Dickes et al 2002
- Diedrich et al 1971
- Dietrick 2013
- DiFranco 1971
- Digital Engine Control for 1982
- Dikshit et al 2022
- Dillard 2005
- Dillon and Creel 1978
- Dillon and Pittman 1977
- Dillon and Pittman 1978
- Ding et al 2023
- Dinsenmeyer et al 2019
- DiOttavio et al 2014
- Dippold 2022
- Direct numerical simulations of 2023
- Disotell et al 2026
- Dissel et al 2005
- Dittmann 1990
- Dittmar 1989
- Dittmar and Lasagna 1982
- Dittmar et al 1983
- Dix and Mattasits 1980
- Do and Paxman 2013
- Dobronski 1988
- Dodson 1982
- Dodson 2005
- Doherty
- Doherty 1978
- Dollfus 1924
- Dollinger et al 2021
- Dolvin 2008
- Dolvin 2009
- Dominick and Watts 1967
- Domino et al 1977
- Dommett and Wright 2001
- Donegan 1954
- Donelli et al 2009
- Donelson et al 1989
- Dong and Ai 2012
- Dong and Li 2022
- Dong et al 2015
- Dong et al 2017
- Dongre 2024
- Donlan 1991
- Dorobantu et al 2013
- Dorsey et al 1999
- Dorsey et al 2000
- Dougherty 2021
- Dougherty 2021
- Dougherty and Fisher 1980
- Dousis
- Dragone 2000
- Dragos Daniel et al 2026
- Drake 1950
- Drake 1957
- Draper et al 1977
- Draper et al 1983
- Dress et al 1992
- Dresser et al 1990
- Driggs et al 2026
- Drinkwater 1961
- Drinkwater et al 1964
- Droandi and Gibertini 2015
- Dryden Overview for Schools 1994
- Dryden Tour Tape, 1994
- Drzewiecki and Foust 1976
- Du et al 2025
- Dudley 2016
- Dufour et al 2014
- Dugan and Hindson 1997
- Dugan et al 1980
- Duke and Jones 1984
- Duke and Lux 1983
- Duke et al 1986
- Duke et al 1986
- Duke et al 1988
- Duke et al 1989
- Dukeman and Gallaher 1998
- Dukes 1970
- Dumbacher 2004
- Dumbacher 2019
- Dumbacher and Klevatt 1994
- Dungan and Clark 1994
- Dungan et al 2026
- Dunker et al 2025
- Dunlap and Steinetz 2002
- Dunlap et al 2001
- Dunlap et al 2001
- Dunn 1980
- Dunn 1990
- Dunn et al 1981
- Dunning 1959
- Dupuis and Edwards 1995
- Dupuis and Edwards 1998
- Duraklar 2024
- Duran 2026
- Duranti and Gamalero 1990
- Durbin 1959
- Durbin and McGeer 1982
- Durston 2023
- Durston 2023
- Durston and Smith 1981
- Dussling 2015
- Duus 2000
- Duval 1981
- Dwyer 1994
- Dykes and Mavris 2016
- Dynamic Lateral-Directional Stability Theory 2003
- Dynamic Longitudinal Stability Flight 2003
- Earls and Sitz 1989
- Eaton and Woolf 2010
- Eckardt et al 2016
- Eckmann et al 1997
- Eckmann et al 1998
- ECO Demonstrator Begins Flight 2018
- Ecodemonstrator Flight Test Program 2020
- Edelman 2024
- Edenborough 1968
- Edmonds and Young 1996
- Edquist 2006
- Edwards 1972
- Edwards 1976
- Edwards 1981
- Edwards 1983
- Edwards 1992
- Edwards 1992
- Edwards and Deets 1975
- Edwards et al 2010
- Effect of Ground Proximity 2016
- Eger et al 2013
- Egerton and Fitzpatrick 1967
- Eggers and Barth 2006
- Eggers and Swenson 1967
- Eggers and Syvertson 1955
- Eggers et al 2005
- Eggers et al 2006
- Eggers et al 2009
- Eggers et al 2011
- Eglin et al 2025
- Ehernberger et al 1992
- Ehresman 1981
- Eigenmann and Bailey 1977
- Eilertson 1975
- Eisenberg and Bowles 1986
- Eisenhut and Strohmayer 2026
- Eklund 2004
- El-Kebir and Ornik 2020
- El-Sayed 2016
- El-Sayed 2024
- El-Sayed 2024
- El-Sayed 2024
- Elario et al 1991
- Elena 2026
- Elhashani et al 2014
- Elisov et al 2018
- Elkhoury 2008
- Elkhoury and Rockwell 2004
- Elkhoury et al 2005
- Elliott 1968
- Elvin 1996
- Emme 1976
- Enciu 2019
- Energy Approach To Performance 2003
- Engelien 1994
- Engelland et al 1992
- Engelund 2001
- Engelund et al 1999
- Engelund et al 2000
- Englar et al 1981
- Ennix-Sandhu 2006
- Erdos 1998
- Erickson 2010
- Erickson et al 1963
- Erickson et al 1984
- Ericsson 1985
- Erk et al 2026
- Ernest and Carroll 2016
- Ernest and Cohen 2016
- Erwin 1990
- Eshlemen 1985
- Esker and Debonis 1991
- Eskey and Wilson 1986
- Eskey and Wilson 1989
- Eskey et al 1984
- Espinosa and Groepler 1992
- Esposito 2023
- Esposito 2023
- Esposito 2023
- Esposito et al 2023
- Estes and McClain 1948
- European Space Agency launches 2015
- Euske et al 2012
- Evans 1954
- Evans and Schilling 1983
- Evans and Schilling 1984
- Everett and Oster 1994
- Evolution of Human Systems 2016
- Ewer 2026
- Ewing 2009
- Experimental aircraft wing propelled 2016
- Exploring Flight Research with 1999
- Extending the Frontiers of 2008
- Faass 1998
- Facility Requirements for Hypersonic 1991
- Faied and Girard 2008
- Fain et al 2026
- Faisal and James 2025
- Falarski 1979
- Falarski and Mort 1969
- Falempin et al 1992
- Falissard et al 2011
- Falkiewicz et al 2011
- Fallon et al 1999
- Fanning and Lucas 1979
- Farmer 1986
- Fast 2014
- Fearn and Margason 1969
- Fechter and Mills 1988
- Feddersen and Cea 1977
- Fedele and Mungiguerra 2018
- Feeser et al 1989
- Fegely et al 2016
- Feigenbaum 1945
- Feil et al 2018
- Feistel et al 1972
- Feller and Burbank 1958
- Felt and Kehoe 1985
- Feng et al 2025
- Feng et al 2026
- Fenny and Hart 2000
- Ferguson and Dreier 2005
- Ferlemann 2005
- Ferlemann et al 2005
- Fern 2017
- Fernandez 1999
- Fernandez and Shockcor
- Ferrandon 1997
- Ferrandon 1998
- Ferranti and Obear 1998
- Ferretti and Carabelli 1983
- Ferris 1973
- Ferro and Costamagna 1988
- Fetterman and Penland 1960
- Fetterman et al 1962
- Feustel-Büechl 1988
- Few 1987
- Fidan et al 2003
- Fidell and Horonjeff 2019
- Fielding and Jones 2000
- Fielding and Southworth 2001
- Fields 1978
- Fifty years of DARPA 2008
- Filatyev et al 2014
- Filburn 2019
- Filippoli et al 2026
- Filippoli et al 2026
- Finch and Briggs 1953
- Finch and Matranga 1959
- Fine et al 1965
- Finnestead and Connor 1969
- Finnestead et al 1970
- First Glide Flight of 1966
- Fischel 1960
- Fischel and Nugent 1953
- Fischenberg 1995
- Fisher 1969
- Fisher 1999
- Fisher 2007
- Fisher and Dougherty 1983
- Fisher and McBride 1955
- Fisher and Meyer 1989
- Fisher and Parcel 2007
- Fisher and Thompson 1955
- Fisher and Windham 1955
- Fisher et al 1990
- Fitzgerald 1992
- Fitzpatrick 2016
- Fitzsimmons 1996
- Fitzsimmons et al 1980
- FitzSimmons et al 1981
- Fivel et al 1975
- Fleck 1983
- Flemming et al 1994
- Fletcher 1994
- Flight Sciences Lab Inc Buffalo Ny 1964
- Flight Test 2017
- Flight Test Data Analysis 2016
- Flight Test Instrumentation 1965
- Flight Test Maneuvers and 2008
- Flight TEST Manual 1959
- Flight test of a 1981
- Flight Test Planning 2021
- Flight Test Procedures for
- Flight Test Programme 1970
- Flight Test Results Pertaining 1970
- Flight Testing 1992
- Flights of Discovery Fifty 2000
- Flint 1969
- Flomenhoft 1994
- Flores et al 2014
- Flow Control and High-Lift 2016
- Flynn et al 2009
- Flynn et al 2009
- Foch 1992
- Foelsche et al 2006
- Foley and Woodrey 1980
- Foley et al 1982
- Ford 1999
- Ford CEng MRAes 1988
- Foreman 1963
- Formation and adjustment of 2018
- Formisano 2024
- Foster 2003
- Foster and Hartman 2017
- Foster and Morris 1960
- Foster and Morris 1961
- Foster et al 1988
- Foster et al 1991
- Foster et al 2020
- Fotia et al 2019
- Franck and Dillard 2006
- Franck and Melese 2008
- Franco et al 2019
- Franke 2016
- Franklin 1986
- Franklin 2000
- Franklin 2018
- Franklin and Anderson 1984
- Franklin and Engelland 1991
- Franklin and Nicholas 1992
- Franklin and Stortz 1989
- Franz 2008
- Franze et al 2013
- Freakley
- Frederick and Ratnayake 2011
- Fredericks 2015
- Free flight research tool 1956
- Freeman and Boyden 1977
- Freeman and Newsom 1966
- Freeman and Spencer 1980
- Freeman et al 1996
- Freeman et al 1996
- Freeman et al 1997
- Freeman et al 1997
- Frei 1982
- French 1988
- French and Howard 1971
- Frendreis and Cesnik 2010
- Freudinger 1989
- Freudinger and Kehoe 1990
- Frey et al 2024
- Frezza et al 2013
- Fricker et al 1992
- Friedlander et al 2017
- Friedrich et al 2022
- Friend 1964
- Frierson and Van Meter 1977
- Frinell 1983
- Frink et al 2012
- Froechtenigt et al 1984
- From Concepts To A 2011
- Froning 2006
- Froning and Bussard 1993
- Froning et al 1995
- Frost et al 2000
- Fry 1967
- Fu et al 2025
- Fu Li et al 2008
- Fuel cell demonstrator aeroplane 2007
- Fuhrmann 2003
- Fujii and Inoue 1998
- Fujii and Inoue 1998
- Fujii and Tamura 1997
- Fujii et al 2001
- Fujii et al 2003
- Fujinaga et al 2007
- Fujio and Ogawa 2021
- Fujio and Ogawa 2022
- Fukami et al 2004
- Fullmer et al
- Further development and flight 1994
- Future Flight Systems. Acceptable
- Förder and Steiner 2020
- Gacy 2011
- Gafka and Daugherty 2000
- Gage and Vander Kam 2003
- Gahan et al 2023
- Gaitonde et al 2006
- Gallagher and O’Donnell 1965
- Gallagher and Wei 2008
- Gallington and Miller 1970
- Gamon 1988
- Gamse and Mort 1966
- Ganglin 2009
- Gansler et al 2010
- Gao et al 2015
- Gao et al 2020
- Gao et al 2021
- Gao et al 2021
- Gao et al 2025
- Garbos and Mouyos 1998
- Garcia 1975
- Garcia et al 1973
- Garcia et al 2019
- Garcia-Velo and Walker 1995
- Gardi et al 2016
- Gardinier and Taylor 1999
- Gardner et al 2004
- Garg 2010
- Garg 2014
- Garg 2016
- Garg 2018
- Garg and Dodiyal 2009
- Garg and Mattern 1991
- Garner 1967
- Garoutte and Bryan 1983
- Garren and Kelly 1966
- Garren et al 1964
- Garringer and Saltzman 1966
- Garton 1974
- Gates and Knudsen 2007
- Gates et al 1996
- Gayler and Kopra 1998
- Ge
- Gebert et al 2000
- Gee and Wolf 1972
- Geister et al 2017
- Gelzer and Peebles 2015
- General Dynamics/Astronautics San Diego Ca 1961
- General Dynamics/Astronautics San Diego Ca 1962
- General Dynamics/Astronautics San Diegoca 1961
- Genito et al 2024
- Gennaretti et al 2010
- Gentry 1968
- Gentry 1972
- Gentry et al 1966
- George et al 1964
- George et al 1989
- Georgiev 2010
- Gera 1986
- Gera et al 1981
- Gerald-Yamasaki 1996
- Gerdes 1977
- Gerdes 1981
- German et al 2023
- Gerner 2003
- Gessow 1947
- Geuther et al 2024
- Ghaffari 1994
- Ghanchi and Gururajan 2026
- Ghatas et al 2017
- Ghatas et al 2017
- Ghate et al 2026
- Ghazi 1993
- Ghoreyshi et al 2014
- Ghosh and Raisinghani 2002
- Ghosh et al 2000
- Ghosh Roy and Peyada 2016
- Ghosh Roy and Peyada 2017
- Gibney 2015
- Gibson 1981
- Gibson and Goetz 1971
- Gibson and Mixson 1959
- Gibson et al 2012
- Gideon and Wasek 2015
- Giersch et al 2015
- Gierszewski et al 2021
- Gilbert
- Gilbert 2015
- Giles et al 1981
- Gillard 1999
- Gilruth 1962
- Gilyard 1989
- Gilyard and Edwards 1983
- Gilyard and Orme 1992
- Gingrich et al 1977
- Giordano de Oliveira Silva and Moennich 2012
- Glaser and Strovers 2011
- Glasgow et al 1981
- Glass et al 2006
- Glass et al 2023
- Gleason et al 1992
- Gleiter 1985
- Glenn 2006
- Glezer 2009
- Glezer 2012
- Glīzde
- Gnemmi et al 1991
- Gnoffo 1989
- Gnoffo 1989
- Gnoffo 1989
- Godwin et al 1964
- Goff 1998
- Goland et al 1964
- Goldberger 1966
- Gong et al 2006
- Gongjun 2014
- Gonzalez et al 2023
- González 2023
- González Mendoza 2026
- González Mendoza 2026
- Goodman and Ireland 2006
- Goodman and Ireland 2007
- Goodrich et al 1983
- Goodrich et al 1983
- Goodson 1966
- Goodson 1966
- Gopalan 2025
- Gordnier et al
- Gordnier et al 2006
- Gordnier et al 2007
- Gorn 1996
- Gorn 2001
- Gorn 2003
- Gorn and De Chiara 2021
- Gorn and De Chiara 2021
- Gorton 2015
- Gorton 2015
- Gossett 1981
- Gossett and Wolowicz 1965
- Gould and Jay W. 1993
- Goupil
- Gouskov et al 1996
- Govindarajan and Sridharan 2021
- Goyne et al 2006
- Grabowsky et al 1981
- Grant et al 2017
- Grantham and Scher 1960
- Grantz et al 1993
- Gratton 2014
- Grauer 2020
- Grauer 2023
- Grauer 2024
- Grauer and Boucher 2017
- Grauer and Boucher 2018
- Grauer and Boucher 2020
- Grauer and Boucher 2020
- Grauer and Morelli 2015
- Grauer and Morelli 2024
- Grauer et al 2017
- Graves 1969
- Gray 1964
- Gray 2008
- Gray Literature Dissertations, Theses 2011
- Green 1918
- Green and Andrews 1989
- Green and Bailey 1994
- Green and Fernandez 1994
- Green et al 1983
- Greene 1958
- Greer 2010
- Greer et al 1999
- Greer et al 1999
- Gregorek and Reuss 1990
- Gregory et al 2010
- Gregory et al 2011
- Grey Literature Dissertations, Theses 2009
- Griffin 1983
- Griffin and Jonas 1983
- Griffin and Takahashi 2022
- Griffin et al 2011
- Grigoli 2024
- Grima 2016
- Grima et al 2016
- Grindle 2011
- Grindle and Bahm 2006
- Grindle and Hackenberg 2016
- Griswold et al 1982
- Groening 1976
- Grose 1979
- Gross and Fasel 2018
- Grossman et al 1999
- Ground and flight testing 2000
- Grunnet and Laster 1966
- Grzesik and Sobolewski 2014
- Guan et al 1999
- Guan et al 2025
- Guelhan et al 2012
- Guelhan et al 2026
- Guerin 2015
- Guerrero et al 2001
- Guerrero et al 2004
- Guiot and Wunnenberg 1980
- Guizzo 2004
- Guizzo 2004
- Gujral et al 2025
- Gul and Yeo 2024
- Gunarathna and Munasinghe 2018
- Guo and Xu 2000
- Guo et al 2017
- Guodong Ning et al
- Gupta
- Gupta 2023
- Gupta et al 2018
- Gustafson 1956
- Gustafson 1970
- Gustafson 1970
- Gustafson 1970
- Gustafson 1970
- Gustafson 1970
- Gustafson 1970
- Gutierrez et al 1995
- Guy 1976
- Gäßler and Robens 2025
- Gómez-Rodríguez and Cuerno-Rejado 2025
- Göttlicher et al 2016
- Gülhan et al 2023
- Gülhan et al 2024
- Haberland 1980
- Hablanian et al 2001
- Hackenberg et al 2018
- Haftmann et al 1988
- Hageman et al 2003
- Hagenmaier et al 2013
- Hager 1955
- Hagopian 2002
- Hague 1983
- Hague and Glatt 1972
- Hall 1965
- Hall 1967
- Hall 1968
- Hall 1970
- Hall 2002
- Hall 2016
- Hall and Hodder 1971
- Hall and Merrett 2025
- Hall and Merrill 1983
- Hall and Shtessel 2005
- Hall and Vincent 1978
- Hall et al 1967
- Hall et al 1967
- Hall et al 1978
- Hall et al 1998
- Hall et al 1999
- Hallberg et al 2006
- Hallberg et al 2008
- Hallion 1984
- Hallion 1991
- Hallion and Peebles 2014
- Ham and Johnson 1969
- Ham et al 1993
- Hamada and Moreno 2018
- Hameed and Bindu 2019
- Hamel 2013
- Hamel and Jategaonkar 1996
- Hamel et al 2022
- Hamilton 1945
- Hamilton and Richardson 1988
- Hamilton et al 1998
- Hammer et al 2026
- Hammond and McLemore 1967
- Hammons 1988
- Hamrick 2004
- Han et al 2009
- Hang 2015
- Hang 2015
- Hang 2017
- Hange 2016
- Hank 2007
- Hank et al 2008
- Hanke 2003
- Hanks and Ham 1992
- Hans and Stine 1991
- Hans et al 2021
- Hansen 1986
- Hansen 1987
- Hansen 1989
- Hansen et al 2004
- Hansen et al 2005
- Hanson 2012
- Hanson 2014
- Hanson et al 1998
- Hanson et al 2002
- Hansu Dai and Jihong Zhu 2010
- Hao et al 2017
- Harasani 2015
- Hardin et al 1993
- Hargest 1966
- Hargus et al 2018
- Haritos and Barnhart 2021
- Harned and Head 1965
- Harney 1963
- Harney 1981
- Harney 2005
- Harney et al 1983
- Harper 1968
- Harper et al 2026
- Harris 1972
- Harris and Centolanza 2016
- Harris et al 1980
- Harris et al 2016
- Harsch 2009
- Hart 1984
- Hart 1992
- Hart 1994
- Hartmann et al 1979
- Hartney
- Hartwig and Sonneborn 1971
- Harvey 2019
- Harvey and Bobbitt 1981
- Harvey and Ryan 2012
- Hasegawa 2025
- Hashii and Thompson 2018
- Hass et al 2011
- Hassan 2008
- Hassell 1960
- Hassell and Hewes 1960
- Hassell and Kirby 1966
- Hastedt et al 2022
- Hatta and Matsuki 1964
- Haugen 1966
- Haus 2023
- Havelock and Bushnell 1985
- Havey and Ferguson 1990
- Hawkins and Dilley 1992
- Haworth and Graham 1984
- Hawthorne 1976
- Hayashi et al 2022
- Hayden 1958
- Hayhurst et al 2014
- Hayhurst et al 2016
- Hazen 1963
- Head 1962
- Head 1981
- Head 2025
- Head-up displays and air 1988
- Heaney et al 2022
- Heaney et al 2024
- Heath et al 2017
- Heberling 2020
- Heeg et al 1993
- Heeg et al 2018
- Hegab 2002
- Hegde 2020
- Heidmann 1976
- Heintzman 1965
- Helffer et al 2014
- Helicopter and Tiltrotor Flight 2018
- Helicopter and V/Stol Aircraft
- Hellbaum and Garner 1988
- Hellman 2014
- Hellman et al 2010
- Hellman et al 2013
- Henderson 1964
- Henderson and Huff 2021
- Henderson and Walters 1981
- Henderson et al 2010
- Henderson et al 2022
- Henkenjohann et al 2023
- Henschel et al 1974
- Hensley 1994
- Herholz and Valentiny 1988
- Herkes et al 2006
- Herkes et al 2007
- Hermes Spaceplane in MBB 1988
- Hernandez Lugo et al 2018
- Hernandez-Garcia and Rodriguez-Cortes 2015
- Hernanz et al 2015
- Hernon and Pinelli 1992
- Herrick 2000
- Herrington et al 1966
- Herrlinger 1991
- Hertzfeld 2000
- Herzog et al 1998
- Hess 1986
- Hetherington 1990
- Hewes and Hassell 1960
- Hewes et al 1958
- Heyson and Grunwald 1966
- Hickey et al 1966
- Hicks 1991
- Hicks 1992
- Hicks 1993
- Hicks and Greenberg 1981
- Hicks and Matheny 1987
- Hicks and Matheny 1989
- Hicks and Petersen 1989
- Hicks and Trippensee 1997
- Hicks et al 1972
- Hicks et al 1987
- Hicks et al 1987
- Hicks et al 1987
- Hidalgo 2000
- Hieser et al 1956
- Hildebrand 1979
- Hildreth and Burton 1983
- Hiliuta and Botez 2006
- Hiliuta and Botez 2007
- Hill 1971
- Hill and Jenkins 1979
- Hill and Schmitt 1964
- Hill and Zierten 1991
- Hillaker 1983
- Hillaker 1983
- Hillje and Tymms 1978
- Hindash and Spaid 1991
- Hines 2012
- Hing and Oh
- Hinson 1959
- Hinton and Eastlake
- Hintzke and Haggard 1991
- Hiraiwa et al 1995
- Hirschberg 1997
- Hirschel and Meier 2004
- Hirschel and Weiland 2009
- Hirsh 1965
- Hirshorn and Kemmerly 2018
- Hirshorn et al 2024
- Hiruma et al 2020
- History of Aircraft and 2022
- History of Aviation 2009
- History of Commercial Aircraft
- History of Supersonic Transport 2020
- History of the SAE
- Hitzel and Zimper 2018
- Hoadley 1988
- Hobbs 2014
- Hochstetler 2017
- Hockman and Eisiminger 1948
- Hodell and Rosner 1957
- Hodge and Audley 1983
- Hodge and Audley 1986
- Hodge and Meyer 1963
- Hodge et al 1981
- Hodges and Walker 1994
- Hoe et al 2012
- Hoey 1983
- Hoey 1991
- Hoffman 1971
- Hoffman et al 1971
- Hoffmann et al 1978
- Hoffrichter
- Hofmann et al 2025
- Hofmann et al 2025
- Hogenson and Lu 1995
- Hoholis et al 2016
- Holberg and Grabowsky 1981
- Holbrook 1988
- Holden 1986
- Holguin and Kostyk 2010
- Holguin and Kostyk 2010
- Holland et al 2000
- Holleman 1965
- Holleman 1966
- Hollis et al 1999
- Hollis et al 2003
- Hollmann 1993
- Holmes 1970
- Holmes and Obara 1992
- Holmes and Woehr 1971
- Holowicz and Holleman 1958
- Holt 1983
- Holubik 1988
- Holway 1966
- Holzhauser and Innis 1960
- Hook and Freeman 1989
- Horbachov et al 2026
- Horn 2008
- Horn 2012
- Horne et al 1994
- Horneman and Kluever 2004
- Horvath et al 1990
- Horvath et al 1999
- Horvath et al 2000
- Horvath et al 2010
- Hosseini and Holzapfel 2022
- Hosseini et al 2019
- Hosseini et al 2020
- Hosseini et al 2025
- Hosseini et al 2025
- Hou and Song 2024
- Houck et al 1977
- Howard 1957
- Howard and Bray 1992
- Howe et al 2008
- Howell 1988
- Howell 2011
- Howell and Shelton 2019
- Howell et al 2010
- Howell et al 2017
- Howland 1953
- Howze 1969
- Hoyt et al 1980
- Hoyt et al 1992
- Hu and Durbin 2012
- Hu and Zhu 2017
- Hu et al 2022
- Hu et al 2026
- Hua 2022
- Huang and German 2025
- Huang and Miele 1967
- Huangzhong et al 2014
- Huber and Kutty 2026
- Huber et al 1991
- Hudson and Stephens 2006
- Hudson and Stephens 2007
- Hudson et al 2019
- Huebner et al 2000
- Huebner et al 2001
- Huebner et al 2009
- Huebner et al 2009
- Hughes and Chrispin 1988
- Hughes et al 2023
- Hull and Roger 1975
- Hulshoff et al 1996
- Human Systems Integration for 2016
- Hummer et al 2018
- Humphreys et al 2010
- Hunley 1999
- Hunt and Rausch 1998
- Hunting H.126 Jet-Flap Research 1963
- Hur and Valasek 2003
- Hurst and Collins 2008
- Hussein and Chudoba 2016
- Huston et al 1955
- Huston et al 1963
- Hutchinson and Miller 1984
- Hutchinson and Steinmann 1980
- Hutto et al 2005
- Huynh and Kriz 2009
- Hyper-X Model Testing with 1996
- Hypersonic Air-Breathing Flight Testing 2022
- Hypersonic and Supersonic Flight 2023
- Hypersonic Drone Vehicle Design 1988
- Hypersonic flight
- Hypersonic flight 1965
- Hypersonic Flight 2014
- Hypersonic Flight 2025
- Hypersonic flight regime and
- Hypersonic plane makes brief 2011
- Hypersonic Reaction Chamber for 2021
- Hypersonic Research Facilities Study 1970
- Hypersonic Research Facilities Study 1970
- Hypersonic Research Facilities Study 1970
- Hyun et al 2023
- Ibrahim and Bil 2013
- Ide and Landman 2025
- Idicula et al 2009
- Idsardi 1983
- Igra 2026
- Iliff 1980
- Iliff 1987
- Iliff 1989
- Iliff and Maine 1982
- Iliff and Maine 1983
- Iliff and Powers 1969
- Iliff and Shafer 1992
- Iliff and Shafer 1993
- Iliff and Shafer 1993
- Iliff and Shafer 1995
- Iliff et al 1978
- Iliff et al 1979
- Immenschuh 1988
- Immenschuh 1990
- Improving Defense Acquisition Insights 2022
- Improving the Military Acquisition 1986
- Ince 1967
- Incorporating agility flight test 1994
- Incorporating Environmental Considerations into 2023
- India to launch prototype 2015
- Industry Insights on Digital 2025
- Influencing Defense Acquisition Delivering 2020
- Inger 2005
- Ingvarson et al
- Initial flight test of 1989
- Innovative Development Global Hawk 2002
- Inokuchi 1996
- Integrated propulsion technology demonstrator 1994
- Integrating Remotely Piloted Aircraft 2016
- International Arms Sales and 2008
- Introduction to Stability and 2003
- Iovnovich et al 2018
- Iqbal 2003
- Irvin and Swan 1956
- Is the Defense Acquisition 2021
- Isakson 1970
- Isakson 1970
- Iscold 2008
- Ishikawa and Ogasawara 2001
- Ishikawa et al 2007
- Ishikawa et al 2008
- Ishimoto 1995
- Ishimoto and Ishimoto 1997
- Ishimoto et al 1996
- Ishimoto et al 2005
- Ishmael and Wierzbanowski 1985
- Ishrat et al 2023
- ISRO Releases the Special 2018
- Ito et al 1990
- Ito et al 1999
- Ivanco et al 2023
- Ivler et al 2019
- İşci and Günel 2021
- Jack and Kc 2020
- Jack and Kc 2020
- Jack et al 2017
- Jack et al 2020
- Jacklin 1986
- Jackson 1953
- Jackson and Coyle 1983
- Jackson and Cruz 1992
- Jackson and Rivers 1998
- Jackson and Taylor 1978
- Jackson et al 1978
- Jackson et al 1991
- Jackson et al 1992
- Jackson et al 1993
- Jackson et al 1994
- Jackson et al 2004
- Jackson et al 2008
- Jackson et al 2009
- Jackson et al 2015
- Jacob da Motta 2020
- Jacobsen and Barber 1977
- Jacobson 1965
- Jacobson 2004
- Jacobson 2004
- Jacobson 2009
- Jacobson 2012
- Jacobson 2012
- Jacobson 2015
- Jaffe 1972
- Jahn 2023
- Jalink 1965
- Janardanan and Jayakumar 2006
- Jann and Greiner-Perth 2009
- Jann and Yakimenko 2015
- Janovsky et al 1998
- Jarvis 1966
- Jarvis 1967
- Jarvis 1989
- Jategaonkar 2005
- Jategaonkar 2006
- Jategaonkar 2015
- Jategaonkar et al 2005
- Jategaonkar et al 2006
- Javorsek et al 2016
- Jayakumar and Das 2007
- Jayanthi et al 2022
- Jayanti et al 2025
- Jayaraman et al 2022
- Jeffery and Holbeche 1975
- Jekosch 1991
- Jenkins 2000
- Jenkins 2007
- Jenkins et al 1968
- Jenkins et al 2003
- Jenks and Haslim 1988
- Jensen and Pera 1977
- Jensen et al 2000
- Jensen et al 2020
- Jentink and Bogue 2005
- Jeong and Bae 2022
- Jeong et al 2014
- Jernell 1971
- Jia and Wang 2024
- Jiang and Voyles 2013
- Jiang et al 2025
- Jianguo et al 2016
- Johnsen and Ginsburg 1953
- Johnson 1991
- Johnson 1995
- Johnson 2003
- Johnson and Craig 1976
- Johnson and Ess 1997
- Johnson and Hall 2003
- Johnson and Klassen 1986
- Johnson and Lawing 1977
- Johnson and Painter 1976
- Johnson and Robinson 2005
- Johnson and Servidio 2008
- Johnson and Sorenson 2006
- Johnson and Walker 2012
- Johnson et al 2003
- Johnson et al 2017
- Johnston and Candler 2023
- Johnston and Sawyer 1988
- Jones 1971
- Jones 1974
- Jones 1987
- Jones 1994
- Jones 2006
- Jones 2007
- Jones 2007
- Jones and Bui 2012
- Jones and Huber 1978
- Jones and Laurence 2025
- Jones and Petley 1991
- Jones and Wilbur D. 1989
- Jones and Wilson 1983
- Jones et al 1983
- Jones et al 2005
- Jones et al 2013
- Jones et al 2023
- Jones et al 2024
- Joppa 1966
- Joppa 1968
- Joppa and Shindo 1965
- Jordan 1972
- Jordan 1974
- Jordan and Bailey 2008
- Jordan et al 2004
- Jordan et al 2005
- Jorgensen et al 1971
- Jorris 2014
- Jorris et al 2011
- Jouannet et al 2008
- Jouannet et al 2012
- Joyce 2026
- Juhasz et al 2012
- Juhasz et al 2022
- Juhasz et al 2023
- Juliana et al 2004
- Jumper 2009
- Junaid R and Beebi M 2015
- June et al 2024
- Jung et al 2020
- Jusko et al 2022
- Kailos and Chesser 1972
- Kain et al 1978
- Kalemaris 1983
- Kalemaris and Cea 1977
- Kaletka and Fu 1993
- Kaliardos et al 2024
- Kaliardos et al 2024
- Kamath et al 1991
- Kambampati and Smith 2017
- Kaminski 1996
- Kan
- Kanayath et al 2012
- Kang et al 2008
- Kang et al 2013
- Kang et al 2017
- Kang et al 2023
- Kanipe 1982
- Kanishk Mahaveer Jain 2025
- Kannan et al 2024
- Kannemans 1995
- Kao and Anderson 1981
- Kapidžić et al 2014
- Kaplan 2002
- Karabacak and Turan 2023
- Karasopoulos et al 1998
- Karl et al 2006
- Karlgaard et al 2004
- Karlgaard et al 2005
- Karlgaard et al 2018
- Kato 1991
- Katz et al 1998
- Katzenberger 1967
- Kauffman 1945
- Kaya and Kutay 2014
- Kaymal 2016
- Kayten and Koven 1945
- Kazan and Krause 1968
- Kc and Jack 2020
- Keener and Brownson 1972
- Keener and Pembo 1962
- Kehoe 1987
- Kehoe 1988
- Kehoe and Freudinger 1994
- Keidel et al 2019
- Keller 1969
- Keller et al 2026
- Kelley 1970
- Kelly 1974
- Kelly 1988
- Kelly and Blosser 1994
- Kelly et al 2010
- Kemp 1969
- Kempel 1971
- Kempel 1971
- Kempel 1982
- Kempel and Manke 1974
- Kempel and Painter 1993
- Kempel and Thompson 1971
- Kempel et al 1970
- Kempel et al 1975
- Kempel et al 1988
- Kempel et al 1994
- Kemper 1930
- Kemper 1939
- Kemper and Renselaer 1969
- Kennedy 1986
- Kennedy et al 1994
- Kentfield 1967
- Kenyon 1968
- Kenyon 2020
- Kenyon et al 2021
- Kerber 1927
- Kerczewski and Griner 2012
- Kerczewski et al 2013
- Kertesz 1965
- Key 1971
- Key et al 1965
- Keye 2011
- Khalid 2023
- Khalid and Faherty 1990
- Khalid and Faherty 1993
- Khambaswadkar 2024
- Khamlak 2026
- Kharisov et al 2008
- Khoshlahjeh et al 2011
- Khurana and Suzuki 2013
- Khurana and Suzuki 2014
- Khurana et al 2012
- Kidd 1966
- Kidwell 1981
- Kier 2023
- Kilgore and Kilgore 1997
- Kim 2005
- Kim 2026
- Kim and Shin 2008
- Kim et al 2011
- Kim et al 2013
- Kim et al 2015
- Kim et al 2026
- Kimathi and Lantos 2024
- Kimberlin and Solies 1992
- Kimmel et al 2011
- Kimura et al 2023
- Kirby 1960
- Kirby 1964
- Kirby and Newsom 1964
- Kirby and Parlett 1964
- Kirkham et al 1974
- Kirkham et al 1975
- Kirschstein and Alles 2004
- Kirschstein and Alles 2005
- Kirsten 2005
- Kirsten and Ash 1974
- Kish et al 2017
- Kishida 2006
- Kitaplioglu et al 1997
- Klabukov et al 2014
- Klein 1978
- Klein 1983
- Klein 1989
- Klein 1990
- Klein 2002
- Klein and Morelli 1992
- Klein and Murphy 1999
- Klein and Noderer 1992
- Klein et al 2016
- Klevatt and Gaubatz 1998
- Klingenberg et al 2026
- Kluever and Horneman 2005
- Kluever et al 2009
- Klun et al 2020
- Klyde et al 2003
- Klyde et al 2015
- Knapp 1999
- Knapp and Johnson 1953
- Knapp and Jordan 1953
- Knapp and Jordan 1953
- Knapp et al 1953
- Knight 2002
- Knighton 1992
- Knoblach 1974
- Knott 1978
- Knotts and Parrag 1983
- Knox 1992
- Ko and Gong 2001
- Kobayashi and Maita 1995
- Kobayashi and Suzuki 2008
- Kobayashi and Tanatsugu 2001
- Kobayashi et al 2001
- Kock and Painter 1968
- Kock and Painter 1969
- Kodera et al 2024
- Koenig 1984
- Koenig et al 1977
- Koeniguer and Spear 2018
- Koh 1971
- Kohlman 1979
- Kohlman et al 1987
- Kohn and Pangilinan 1986
- Kokan and Olds 2002
- Kokolios 1993
- Kolga and Rundau 2024
- Komar and Christenson 1996
- Komerath et al 1998
- Kondrashov 2023
- Kong 1994
- Koning 2016
- Konno et al 1998
- Kontogiannis et al 2015
- Koothan Venkateswaran et al 2025
- Kopardekar 2016
- Kopardekar 2017
- Kopardekar et al 2016
- Koppes and Anderson 1977
- Kordes and McKay 1962
- Korecki and Hoika 2026
- Kors 1988
- Korunov 2025
- Kossira et al 1993
- Kostyk 2007
- Kostyk 2008
- Kostyk 2011
- Kostyk and Risch 2013
- Kotansky and Bower 1978
- Kotfilia and Painter 1969
- Kotob and Kaufman 1974
- Kotob and Kaufman 1975
- Kotsabasis 1981
- Kouba et al 2003
- Kowal 2011
- Kozlak et al 2017
- Kraft 1994
- Kraft 2020
- Kramer et al 2018
- Kraus et al 1999
- Kress 1980
- Kreutz 1970
- Kreuzer and Niehuis 2017
- Krone 1980
- Krumenacker and Pellicano 1992
- Kubo 2018
- Kubricky 2007
- Kuehme et al 2014
- Kufeld et al 2019
- Kufeld et al 2019
- Kuhn 1960
- Kuhn 1965
- Kuhn 1967
- Kuhn 1979
- Kuhn 1982
- Kuhn 1986
- Kuhn 1987
- Kuhn 1991
- Kuhn et al 1964
- Kukreja 2007
- Kukreja 2008
- Kukreja 2008
- Kukreja and Bernstein 2012
- Kumar 2020
- Kumar and Ghosh 2011
- Kumar and Ghosh 2017
- Kumar and Ghosh 2018
- Kumar and Ghosh 2018
- Kumar and Ghosh 2023
- Kumar and Kothari 2024
- Kumar et al 2013
- Kumar et al 2026
- Kunwar and Chakraborty 2025
- Kunwar et al 2026
- Kuppuswamy and Kiran 1981
- Kuranov and Korabelnikov 2008
- Kurkcu et al 2011
- Kurtz et al 2015
- Kutluay et al 2009
- Kutney 1966
- Kuzin et al 2009
- Kvaternik 1974
- Kwak et al 2006
- Kwiek et al 2023
- La et al 1993
- Labbe et al 2009
- LaBiche 2003
- Lackey and Hadfield 1992
- Lake et al 1980
- Lam 1998
- Lamar et al 2001
- Lambright 2015
- Lampe and Atwater 1988
- Lampkin 1980
- Lamy 1983
- Lan et al 2004
- Lancaster 1977
- Lander and Palcza 1974
- Lang 1981
- Langford et al 1990
- Langill 1965
- Langins et al 1987
- Langley Research Center 1966
- Lantz 1998
- Lapalme et al 2016
- Lappos and Phelps 1991
- Large et al 1981
- Large scale static tests 1978
- Largent 1986
- Larrabee
- Larsen 1975
- Larsen 2000
- Larsen 2003
- Larsen 2005
- Larson 1972
- Larson 1986
- Larson and Montoya 1964
- Larson and Pakhomov 2008
- Larson et al 1983
- Larson et al 2009
- Larsson 2019
- Larsson and Enqvist 2016
- Larsson et al 2020
- Lateral-Directional Stability Theory and 2003
- Latham and Tunnell 1959
- Lau 2025
- Laue 1998
- Laue 2001
- Lauer 2006
- Lauer 2007
- Lauer et al 2010
- Launius 2013
- Launius 2013
- Laurence 2023
- Lavelle 2017
- Lavi 1967
- Lawing 1975
- Lawing 1978
- Lawing et al 1991
- Lawrence and Mills 2002
- Lawton 1990
- Layton 1970
- Layton 1974
- Layton 1984
- Layton 1986
- Le and Goo 2021
- Le and Goo 2021
- Le Goff and Moreau 2013
- Lebacqz 1974
- Lebacqz and Scott 1984
- Lechniak 2017
- Lee 1985
- Lee and Han 2016
- Lee and Nagati 1999
- Lee et al 2014
- Lee et al 2024
- Lee et al 2026
- Lei 2014
- Lei et al 2017
- Leite et al 2009
- Lemaignen et al 1986
- Lemaignen et al 1986
- Lenz and McKeever 1976
- Leon et al 2009
- Letchworth 2011
- Letchworth and Letchworth 2000
- Leung et al 2019
- Level Flight Performance Flight 2003
- Levinson 1987
- Levy 1998
- Levy and McDevitt 1964
- Lewerenz 1987
- Lewis 1989
- Lewis 1991
- Lewis 2007
- Lewis and Gupta 1995
- Lewis and Lewis 1981
- Lewis and McLeod 1965
- Lewis et al 1978
- Lewis et al 1992
- Li 2021
- Li 2022
- Li 2024
- Li and Chen 2003
- Li and Hu 2018
- Li and Wey 1988
- Li and Xia 2014
- Li and Xia 2017
- Li and Xia 2018
- Li and Xia 2018
- Li and Yang 2025
- Li et al 2015
- Li et al 2021
- Li et al 2021
- Li et al 2022
- Li et al 2023
- Li et al 2024
- Li et al 2024
- Li et al 2024
- Li et al 2025
- Li et al 2025
- Liang et al 2017
- Liang et al 2020
- Liang et al 2022
- Liang et al 2025
- Lichota et al 2016
- Lieberman 1963
- Lieblein et al 1973
- Liff 1978
- Light et al 2017
- Light High-Temperature Aluminum Alloys 1992
- Lightweight low-cost flight test 2007
- Lim 2019
- Lim and Jung 2025
- Lim et al 2000
- Lima Filho et al 2021
- Lin 2002
- Lin and Jan 2013
- Lind 2003
- Lind and Beck 1991
- Lind and Tamplin 1981
- Lind et al 1997
- Linden 1972
- Linden and Hellyar 1974
- Lindgren 2018
- Lindsey and McMullan 2006
- Ling 2017
- Lira Sassett et al 2025
- Littlefield and Melton 1999
- Littlefield and Melton 2000
- Littleton and Janzen 2008
- Liu and Hui 2021
- Liu and McVeigh 1991
- Liu et al 2014
- Liu et al 2016
- Liu et al 2016
- Liu et al 2021
- Liu et al 2023
- Liu et al 2023
- Liu et al 2023
- Liu et al 2025
- Liu et al 2025
- Liu et al 2026
- Lloyd et al 1978
- Lo 1970
- Lo 1971
- Lockheed Martin Skunk Works 1999
- Lockheed-Georgia Co Marietta 1969
- Lockman et al 1990
- Lockman et al 1992
- Loftin 1985
- Logistics Management Inst Bethesda Md 1992
- Logsdon and Williamson 1997
- Lokos et al 2015
- London and Lyles 1998
- London and Sumrall 1999
- Londono and Leonhardt 2012
- Long 1968
- Longitudinal Control And Trim 2003
- Longo 2008
- Lonzaga 2021
- Loomis and Palmer 2001
- Lopez et al 2021
- Lord 1985
- Lorell et al 2017
- Losik 2012
- Loughran et al 2024
- Louisse and Marshall 1976
- Louma 1961
- Love 1971
- Love and Argrow 2021
- Love and Fischel 1965
- Love and Young 1966
- Love and Young 1966
- Love and Young 1967
- Lovera et al 2026
- Loving 1966
- Lozino-Lozinsky et al 1996
- Lu 2005
- Lu and Lanter 1980
- Lu et al 2015
- Lu et al 2016
- Lu et al 2017
- Lu et al 2019
- Lu et al 2022
- Lucas et al 1978
- Luidens 1976
- Luidens et al 1981
- Luker and Hutsell 1998
- Lum et al 2017
- Luo et al 2024
- Luoma 1961
- Lusty 1966
- Lutfi and Nieder 1983
- Lux and Burkes 2008
- Lux et al 2007
- Lux-Baumann and Burkes 2005
- Lux-Baumann and Burkes 2006
- Lux-Baumann et al 2006
- Lydon and Va 1995
- Lykins and Keshmiri 2010
- Lyle 1999
- Lynde et al 2021
- Lyshevski
- Lytton 1967
- M2-F2 Lifting Body Accident 1967
- Ma et al 2017
- Ma et al 2022
- Maahs 1989
- Mabius and Kaufman 1976
- MacConochie 2000
- MacDonald and Shepherd 2008
- Machin 2000
- Machnik et al 2022
- Machowski et al 2016
- Mack 1998
- Mack et al 2009
- Mackall et al 1988
- Mackall et al 1990
- Mackall et al 1992
- Mackall et al 1998
- Mackall et al 1998
- Maclean 1991
- MacLean and Rodriguez 1996
- MacLean et al 1992
- MacLeod 2026
- MacLeod and Begent 2025
- Macmillan 1981
- Macret and Leveugle 1999
- Macwilkinson et al 1974
- Macwilkinson et al 1974
- Maddalon et al 2013
- Maddalon et al 2013
- Maddock and Minisci 2016
- Madhusudana Rao et al 2014
- Madsen 1982
- Magee and Wernicke 1979
- Maggitti 1965
- Maglieri et al 1961
- Maglieri et al 1990
- Maine and Iliff 1986
- Maine and Murray 1988
- Maine et al 1990
- Maine et al 1994
- Maine et al 1995
- Maisaia 2023
- Maisel and Harris 1981
- Maisel et al 2000
- Maita and Kobayashi 1996
- Maita et al 1993
- Makino and Noguchi 2003
- Malaek et al 2006
- Maliska and Clarke 2023
- Mallet et al 1992
- Mallozzi et al 2014
- Maly 2020
- Maly et al 2023
- Mamplata and Tang 2011
- Mandal and Gu 2016
- Mangalam et al 1987
- Manke and Love 1975
- Manke et al 1970
- Manley et al 2000
- Mannai 1962
- Manning et al 1992
- Manning et al 1995
- Marchese 1963
- Marcum 2001
- Mardiyanto et al 2018
- Margason 1970
- Margason 1982
- Margason and Hoad 1979
- Marks 1973
- Marks 2016
- Marlow 2003
- Marmie et al 2015
- Marques et al 2013
- Marquiz et al 2025
- Marr and Neal 1972
- Marschall 2011
- Marshall
- Marshall 1986
- Marshall 1986
- Marshall 2010
- Marshall and Schweikhard 1973
- Marshall and Steinmann 1974
- Marshall et al 2005
- Marshall et al 2005
- Marshall et al 2005
- Martin 1980
- Martin 1996
- Martin 2006
- Martin and Reed 1952
- Martin Co Denver Co 1966
- Martin et al 2018
- Martin et al 2024
- Martinez 2012
- Martinez Schramm et al 2015
- Martínez Morán 2018
- Marvakov and Holzapfel 2021
- Marwaha et al 2008
- Mas Colomer
- Masilamani et al 2018
- Mason 2013
- Mason and Rufer 2015
- Mason et al 2024
- Mason et al 2024
- Massengill 1993
- Masson-Zwaan 2026
- Matheny and Panageas 1981
- Matranga 1961
- Matranga et al 1962
- Matsuno and Andreeva-Mori 2023
- Matt 2024
- Matthews and Key 1977
- Maughmer and Somers 1987
- Maughmer et al 1993
- Maus et al 1983
- Mavriplis et al 2007
- Maydew 1964
- Mayer and Wozniak 2006
- Mayfield and Smith 1978
- Mbaye et al 2023
- McAteer et al 2018
- McCaleb and Holland 1999
- McCallum 2022
- McCalmont et al 2005
- McCarty et al 2003
- McCauley et al 2015
- McClinton et al 1996
- McClinton et al 1998
- McClinton et al 1998
- McClinton et al 1999
- McClinton et al 2001
- McClinton et al 2002
- McClure 1998
- McConnaughey et al 1995
- McCormack and Poteate Jr. 1965
- McCormick 1956
- McCormick and Smith 1988
- McCoy 1998
- McCracken 1979
- McCracken and Jorris 2011
- McCrink and Gregory 2017
- McDaniel 1993
- McDaniel 2005
- McElreath 1972
- McFadyen and Martin 2016
- McGee 1977
- McGee et al 1978
- McGhee 1970
- McGhee 1999
- McGhee 2000
- McGinley 2008
- McGinn and Nallanthighal 1993
- McGovern 2017
- McGREGOR and Smith 1966
- McIntyre 1963
- McKay and Noll 1965
- McKay and Scott 1961
- McKenzie 1973
- McKillip 1997
- McKinney and Baals 1982
- McKinney and Newsom 1962
- McKinney and Newsom 1967
- McKinney et al 1966
- McKinnis et al 2021
- McLemore 1966
- McMurtry and Ellis 2024
- McNally and Bach 1988
- McNeal 2004
- McNicol 2022
- McNicol and Wu 2014
- McPherson 1977
- McQuellin et al 2020
- McTigue 1970
- McTigue and Layton 1969
- McTigue and Ryan 1968
- McVeigh et al 1990
- McVeigh et al 2011
- Mead 1998
- Meakin 1993
- Mease and Vinh 1988
- Mease et al 1999
- Medlej et al 2017
- Meeroff et al 2024
- Mehra and Tyler 1973
- Mehra et al 1972
- Mehta 1989
- Mehta 1992
- Mehta 1995
- Mehta 1995
- Mehta 1996
- Mehta and Bowles 2001
- Mehta and Bowles 2001
- Mehta and Kutler 1994
- Meineke and Urry 1992
- Melander and Candler 2024
- Melgaard 1986
- Melton and Hall 1968
- Melzer 2020
- Mendela 1971
- Mendham 2003
- Menges 1995
- Menon and Walker 1988
- Mercier and Gierczynski 2017
- Meridian Corp Falls Church Va 1981
- Merlin 2009
- Merlin 2014
- Merrick 1982
- Merrick et al 1990
- Mertaugh 1998
- Methods for Reducing Data 2003
- Mettler et al 2000
- Metz 1992
- Meuleners 1981
- Meuwly 2014
- Meyer 1992
- Meyer 2007
- Meyer and Schneider 1984
- Meyer et al 1992
- Meyerson 1998
- Meyerson and Taylor 2001
- Meyyappa 1996
- Michael A. Bolender 2006
- Michalowski and Varano 2017
- Michek et al 2023
- Micol 1987
- Micol 1990
- Miele 1955
- Miele 1968
- Mihaloew and Drummond 1989
- Mikula et al 2000
- Milam and Petrozzi 1974
- Miley et al 1981
- Miller 1973
- Miller 1985
- Miller 2000
- Miller 2007
- Miller 2007
- Miller 2014
- Miller 2015
- Miller 2023
- Miller 2024
- Miller and Clark 1965
- Miller and Jenkins 2000
- Miller and Oncley 1971
- Miller et al 1981
- Miller et al 1998
- Miller et al 1998
- Miller et al 2014
- Miller et al 2017
- Miller et al 2023
- Mills and Haas 1966
- Minami and Tsukamoto 2006
- Minglang et al 2018
- Minnema et al 2019
- Minor 2008
- Minor and Shimer 1986
- Minor et al 2004
- Mirmirani et al 2009
- Mishra et al 2022
- Mitchell 2004
- Mitchell and Peck 1949
- Miura et al 1997
- Miyazawa et al 1996
- Mizobata et al 2011
- Mizukami 2004
- Mo et al 2022
- Mobley 1999
- Modeling and Simulation in 2002
- Moes 2009
- Moes and Iliff 2002
- Moes et al 2000
- Moffatt 1989
- Mohamed and Dongare 2021
- Mohamed and Dongare 2021
- Mohamed et al 2019
- Mohr 1975
- Moir et al 1987
- Moise et al 2000
- Molina et al 2009
- Moller 1985
- Molusis and Briczinski 1974
- Monk 2019
- Monk 2020
- Monk et al 2019
- Monteil 2024
- Montel and Thielecke 2015
- Montoya and Palitz 1967
- Moon et al 2005
- Moore 2015
- Moore and Harney 1988
- Moore et al 1998
- Moorhouse 1990
- Moorhouse 1991
- Moralez et al 1987
- Morawski et al 2019
- Morehouse 2006
- Morelli 1991
- Morelli 1993
- Morelli 1994
- Morelli 1995
- Morelli 1996
- Morelli 1998
- Morelli 2000
- Morelli 2000
- Morelli 2002
- Morelli 2006
- Morelli 2008
- Morelli 2009
- Morelli 2010
- Morelli 2011
- Morelli 2021
- Morelli 2021
- Morelli 2021
- Morelli and Grauer 2018
- Morelli and Klein 1995
- Morelli and Klein 1997
- Morelli and Morelli 1997
- Morelli and Smith 2010
- Morelli et al 2005
- Morelli et al 2013
- Morgenfeld 1992
- Morgenstern and Rallabhandi 2021
- Morger 1988
- Mori et al 1999
- Mori et al 2001
- Mori et al 2002
- Morito et al
- Morris 1993
- Morris and Tigner 1995
- Morris et al 1964
- Morrison 2023
- Mort 2020
- Moses 2003
- Moses 2003
- Mosley 1972
- Moszczynski and Grant 2017
- Motes 2016
- Motoda et al 1999
- Moua 2010
- Moua et al 2008
- Moua et al 2008
- Moul 1957
- Mouritsen 1994
- Muchow 2013
- Mueller 1965
- Muellner and Cusimano 1992
- Mulder 1988
- Mullen and Reed 2021
- Mullenix et al 2008
- Munday 2000
- Munday et al 2000
- Munoz 2018
- Munoz 2021
- Munoz et al 2016
- Munter 1954
- Murakami et al 2007
- Murakami et al 2008
- Murch 2008
- Murch et al 2009
- Murcia-Piñeros et al 2026
- Murman 1982
- Murphy 1996
- Murphy 1999
- Murphy and Klein 2008
- Murphy and Klein 2010
- Murphy and Otto 2017
- Murphy et al 1999
- Murray 1990
- Muscarello 2019
- Muse 1961
- Muse et al 2008
- Mustopa 2022
- Mutuel 2015
- Myers and Burcham 1984
- Na et al 2022
- NACA Conference on Aircraft 1957
- NACA/NASA History at Dryden 1990
- Nadeau Beaulieu et al 2006
- Nadimi and Frazer 2001
- Naeseth 1970
- Nagamatsu 1962
- Nagata et al 2026
- Nagel 1982
- Nagel and Becker 1973
- Nagel and Shiner 1983
- Nagel and Thomas 1965
- Nair and Kukreja 2025
- Najam 2014
- Nakatani et al 2011
- Nance 2013
- Nance and Reed 2011
- Napolitano and Spagnuolo 1993
- Napolitano et al 1994
- Napolitano et al 2001
- Napolitano et al 2001
- Nark et al 2017
- NASA Aeronautics Research 2008
- NASA Conference on V/STOL 1960
- NASA National Civil Tiltrotor 1989
- NASA Scout ST-1 Flight-Test 1962
- NASA’s aeronautics program Systems 1980
- NASA’s Aeronautics Research and 1979
- National advisory committee for 1927
- NATO and 1992 Defense 1989
- Navarro 1997
- Navarro 2009
- Navarro 2019
- Navickiene et al 2025
- Neal 1970
- Neal and Flick 2017
- Nebiker 1975
- Nebylov and Nebylov 2011
- Nebylov and Tomita
- Nebylov et al 1999
- Neely and Tjong 2008
- Neely and Tracy 2006
- Negaard 1980
- Neill and Pesyridis 2017
- Nelms 1978
- Nelms 1984
- Nelms and Anderson 1984
- Nelms and Bailey 1974
- Nelms and Durston 1981
- Nelms et al 1976
- Nelson and Maa 1996
- Nelson et al 1993
- Nelson et al 1995
- Nelson et al 1997
- Nelson et al 2024
- Nemie 2024
- Nepomuceno et al 2022
- Neri 2015
- Neroba 2020
- Nesbitt et al 2025
- Neuhart et al 2009
- Neuhaus 2018
- Neumann 2005
- Neumannn et al 2016
- Newcome 2004
- Newman et al 2014
- Newsom 1967
- Newsom and Pototzky 1981
- Ng and Datta 2018
- Ngo and Doman 2002
- Nguyen and Cord 1999
- Nguyen and Krishnakumar 2007
- Nguyen et al 2009
- Nguyen et al 2013
- Nial 1972
- Niazi et al 2006
- Nichols 1960
- Nichols 1990
- Nicholson and lowry 1966
- Nicholson et al 1988
- Nickol and Frederic 2013
- Nicola et al 2025
- Nicolì et al 2006
- Niebanck 1969
- Niedling 1982
- Niehaus 1962
- Niewald and Parker 1999
- Niewald and Parker 2000
- Nigam 2014
- Nippress and Wilson 1992
- Nishimura 1980
- Nissen et al 1948
- Nixon et al 1999
- Nizin et al 2016
- Noneman 2002
- Nonweiler 1959
- Norambuena et al 2016
- Norlin 1995
- North 1978
- Northam 1987
- Northam 1990
- Northfield 2019
- Norton 1990
- Novak 1975
- Ntuen et al 1992
- Nuhija 2021
- Numerical Optimization on Approach 2016
- Nusrath et al 2014
- O’Donnell and Mohseni 2018
- O’Mallei 1957
- Obear and Ferranti 1996
- Oblique Wing Remotely Piloted 1974
- Obrien 1976
- Ochi 2004
- Oda and Miwa 2019
- Oelker and Friehmelt 1998
- Ohkami et al 1991
- Okninski et al 2016
- Oktay 2014
- Okuno and Kawachi 1993
- Olds and Bellini 1998
- Oleskiw et al 2001
- Olhausen 1975
- Olney et al 2000
- Olson 2015
- Olson 2018
- Olstad 1960
- Olstad 1981
- Omran et al 2008
- Oneill-Rood and Glover 1990
- Ooi
- Ordaz et al 2004
- Orme and Gilyard 1992
- Orme and Gilyard 1993
- Orr et al 2014
- Osborne and Stafford 1960
- Osder et al 1975
- Ossmann et al 2019
- Osterman and Mulley 1977
- Ostheimer and Giguere 1963
- Ott 2015
- Ouellette 2015
- Ouellette et al 2014
- Ouellette et al 2023
- Ouellette et al 2026
- Overfield and Crawford 1967
- Overview and History of
- Owen et al 2010
- Owens et al 2006
- Oyama et al 2024
- Ozger 2013
- Oztekin et al 2011
- P.V and Laxman 2023
- Pace et al 2008
- Padfield 1986
- Padfield and Duval 1982
- Padua and Preisighe Viana 2025
- Padula and Gillian 2006
- Page and Anderson 1996
- Pahle et al 1991
- Paik and Gandhi 2010
- Paik et al 2007
- Painter 1983
- Painter 1983
- Painter and Erickson 1984
- Painter and Sitterle 1972
- Painter and Sitterle 1974
- Pak 2013
- Pak 2017
- Pak 2020
- Palitz 1966
- Pallister et al 1992
- Palmer et al 1994
- Palmer et al 1997
- Palomino 2022
- Palumbo et al 2001
- Palumbo et al 2002
- Palumbo et al 2003
- Pamadi and Brauckmann 1999
- Pamadi et al 2000
- Pan et al 2018
- Pan et al 2020
- Panayotov and Zikyamov 2026
- Panda 2022
- Panish et al 2023
- Papa and Stoliker 1988
- Parameter estimation techniques and 1974
- Paredes and Choudhari 2018
- Paredes et al 2020
- Paris 1965
- Paris and Bonner 2003
- Park and Park 2025
- Park and Roh 2025
- Park et al 2013
- Parker 2022
- Parlini 1983
- Parlini and Combley 1986
- Parrish and Steinmetz 1972
- Patel and Black 2005
- Patel et al 2023
- Patterson 1966
- Patterson and Arena 2015
- Patterson et al 2016
- Patton 1980
- Patton et al 1979
- Pauer 2018
- Paul and Pratt 2004
- Pauli 1965
- Paulson and Hassell 1959
- Pavlock 2013
- Pavlock et al 2011
- Pawlak 1994
- Payne and Samuels 1990
- Pearce 2014
- Pearson 1986
- Pearson 1995
- Peebles 2006
- Peebles 2007
- Peebles 2007
- Peebles 2008
- Pegg et al 1974
- Pendergraft and Nugent 1984
- Pendleton 1965
- Pendleton et al 2000
- Pendley 1947
- Penland 1975
- Penland and Fetterman 1958
- Penland and Romeo 1971
- Penland et al 1978
- Penn and Lindley
- Penn and Lindley 1997
- Pepper 1969
- Perrier et al 1996
- Persson and Lawrence 2017
- Pesoshin 2014
- Pestana 2010
- Petersen 1976
- Petersen 1976
- Petersen 1981
- Petersen et al 2004
- Peterson 1982
- Peterson 1982
- Peterson 1997
- Peterson 2004
- Peterson et al 1980
- Peterson et al 2016
- Petley et al 1991
- Petrone and Wessel 1975
- Peyada and Ghosh 2009
- Pfifer and Danowsky 2016
- Phatak and Lee 1985
- Philipsen et al 2015
- Phillips
- Phillips 1998
- Phillips and Cruz 1993
- Pidvysotskyi 2021
- Pietersen 1986
- Pilot Training and Certification
- Pilot Training Recommendations for
- Pinelli 1990
- Piore et al 2020
- Pitman
- Plaetschke and Weiss 1988
- Plaetschke et al 1982
- Platou 1968
- Platt 1991
- Platz and Bounajem 1992
- Platzer and Margason 1976
- PlCKERELL and Cresswell 1968
- Poderico et al 2012
- Polak and George 1998
- Polhamus 1950
- Policy Issues of Remotely 2016
- Pommier-Budinger et al 2016
- Ponton and Warnes 2007
- Pool and Bosman 1974
- Popescu
- Porter 1988
- Portoni and Dufrene 2023
- Portree 1998
- Post and Sundt 2017
- Post et al 2017
- Potter 1965
- Potthast 1980
- Powell 2017
- Powell and Cruz 1991
- Powell and Shyy 2013
- Powell et al 1998
- Powers 1994
- Powers 1995
- Powers 1997
- Prabhakar et al 2023
- Practice for Independent Audit
- Practices for Unmanned Aircraft
- Pradeep 2002
- Praharaj et al 1986
- Praharaj et al 1986
- Praharaj et al 1986
- Prasad 2022
- Prasetiyo et al 2024
- Prasinos et al 2025
- Prediction and Verification of 1985
- Preisser and Chestnutt 1984
- Preliminary design of propulsion 1977
- Preliminary design study of 1980
- Price 1964
- Price 1964
- Prislin 2019
- Proceedings of the Ninth 1993
- Proceedings of the X-15 1991
- Progress of the X-15 1965
- Pruett et al 1981
- Prunariu et al 2023
- Pruyn and Lönroth 1993
- Pruyn and Taylor 1970
- Przedpelski 1965
- Pugh 1992
- Pugh et al 2020
- Pugsley 1987
- Pulsonetti
- Pursel 1977
- Pusztai et al 2024
- Putman 1961
- Putnam 1984
- Putnam 1984
- Putnam and Ayers 1989
- Putnam and Braun 2016
- Putnam and Burcham 1976
- Pyle 1971
- Pyle and Ash 1970
- Pérez Rus and Le Gal 2024
- Qi and Wenhai 2014
- Qing et al 2022
- Qinkun Xiao et al 2006
- Qu et al 2024
- Quast et al 1990
- Queen and Cochrane 1982
- Queijo et al 1979
- Quigley 1964
- Quigley and Holzhauser 1974
- Quinn 2022
- Quinn and Choe 2012
- Quinn and Gong 1990
- Quinn and Olinger 1969
- Raab 2026
- Rabadan and Weigand 2013
- Rabina 2010
- Rabourdin et al 2014
- Radd 1963
- Radford and Andrisani 1984
- Radtke 1976
- Rae 1961
- Rae 1973
- Rae and Shindo 1969
- Raffel et al 2022
- Rafi et al 2018
- Ragauskas et al 2016
- Ragheb et al 2013
- Rahmani et al 2022
- Raillon et al 1992
- Raisinghani and Ghosh 2002
- Raisinghani and Kumar 1995
- Raisinghani et al 1999
- Ralston 1984
- Ramin et al 2022
- Ramjet supersonic “flight tests” 1958
- Ramnath 1970
- Ramsen et al 1951
- Randall et al 2000
- Randall et al 2014
- Raney 1987
- Raney and Lallman 1991
- Raney and Waszak 2003
- Raney et al 1993
- Raney et al 1993
- Rangacharyulu and Moore 1991
- Ranier 2001
- Ranka 2020
- Raol and Jategaonkar 1995
- Raol and Singh 2023
- Raol and Singh 2023
- Rasky et al 1998
- Rasky et al 2006
- Rasmussen 1979
- Ratnayake 2007
- Ratnayake 2009
- Ratnayake 2010
- Ratnayake et al 2011
- Ratnayake et al 2011
- Ratvasky 2024
- Rausch et al 1997
- Rausch et al 2000
- Ray et al 1988
- Ray et al 1990
- Ray et al 1992
- Ray et al 2002
- Raymer 1988
- Re 1974
- Reaser 1997
- Recapturing NASA’s Aeronautics Flight 2012
- Recine et al 2023
- Recommended Practice When Flight 2021
- Redd et al 1979
- Redding 1984
- Redeker and Voersmann 1988
- Rediess 1974
- Rediess 1989
- Rediess and Melton 1994
- Redifer et al 2007
- Reding and Svendsen 1988
- Reed 1955
- Reed 1980
- Reed and Watts 1961
- Reed et al 1997
- Reed et al 2012
- Reeder 1964
- Reeder 1965
- Reeder 1967
- Reeder 1974
- Reehorst 1992
- Reforming Defense Acquisition 2008
- Regan 2008
- Regenie et al 1992
- Regenie et al 1994
- Reghunath and Ramaiah 2022
- Rehman et al 2009
- Rehman et al 2009
- Reichenbach 2003
- Reimann 2016
- Reimer et al 2023
- Reimer et al 2025
- Reinert and Adams 2003
- Reinhardt 1948
- Reller and Seegmiller 1960
- Remple and Tischler 2006
- Ren 2002
- Ren et al 2024
- Ren et al 2025
- Rendon and Snider 2008
- Renselaer 1977
- Report no. 300. The 1929
- Report no. 618, Comparative 1938
- Report of the Defense 1992
- Representative Operations of V/STOL 2002
- Research and Analysis on 2022
- Research and Technology Organisation Rto 2005
- Research directed toward determination 1968
- Research Instrumentation Requirements for 1974
- Research-Airplane-Committee Report on Conference 1956
- Research-Airplane-Committee Report on Conference 1958
- Results of an attitude 1979
- Return on Investement ROI 2020
- Reubush 1992
- Reukauf et al 1974
- Reusable Launch Vehicle 1995
- Reusable Launch Vehicle Landing 2026
- Rew et al 2013
- Rey 2000
- Reynolds 1997
- Rezek 1983
- Rezek 1985
- Rezy 1980
- Rhea and Moore 1988
- Rhoads 1992
- Rhodes 1970
- Rhodes et al 1993
- Rhodes et al 2008
- Ricciardi and Minwalla 2016
- Ricciardi et al 2020
- Rice 1946
- Rice and Hazlwood 1994
- Rich 1969
- Rich 1969
- Richard 2006
- Richards 1997
- Richards 2000
- Richards 2008
- Richards and Monaghan 1997
- Richards et al 2010
- Richards et al 2011
- Richardson 1959
- Richardson 1976
- Richardson 1995
- Richardson et al 1992
- Richardson et al 2001
- Richey et al 1976
- Richwine 1996
- Richwine and Del Frate 1995
- Richwine and Delfrate 1994
- Richwine et al 1989
- Riddle et al 1981
- Riddle et al 1988
- Riesenfeld 1968
- Riggins et al 2003
- Riggins et al 2006
- Riley Jr. 1992
- Rinehart et al 2025
- Rios et al 2020
- Risch 2008
- Risch et al 2009
- Risch et al 2009
- Risch et al 2009
- Rivers 1999
- Rivers 2019
- Rivers et al 1991
- Rivers et al 1994
- Rizk et al 1987
- Robbins 1967
- Roberts 1987
- Roberts 1988
- Roberts 1988
- Roberts and Anderson 1977
- Roberts and Anderson 1981
- Roberts and Brown 1988
- Roberts and Henderson 1999
- Roberts and Shawler 1994
- Roberts et al 1981
- Robertson and Hartfield 1992
- Robinson 2004
- Robinson and Gerwin 2001
- Rocchio et al 2017
- Rocket-Powered Aircraft 2017
- Rodenbaugh and Veno 1965
- Rodiere et al 1988
- Rodríguez-Segade et al 2024
- Roeser and Mönnich 2024
- Rogers 1953
- Rogers 1963
- Rogers 2000
- Rogers 2002
- Rogers 2002
- Rogers and Dragone 1996
- Rogers et al 1969
- Rohani et al 2025
- Roland 1984
- Rolls 1965
- Rolls 1965
- Rolls and Aoyagi 1977
- Rolls et al 1976
- Rolls-Royce Ships Aircraft Demonstrator 1992
- Rollstin 1973
- Romere et al 1978
- Roncioni et al 2006
- Roncoli 1982
- Rooker 1970
- Rooney 2003
- Rooney et al 1977
- Roosenboom et al 2012
- Rorie et al 2018
- Rose and Fearing 2014
- Rosenberg and Schuch 1983
- Rosende 1979
- Rosenthal 1982
- Rosenthal and Brandeau 1983
- Rosenthal et al 1988
- Ross 2022
- Ross and Olson 1990
- Roth 2009
- Roth et al 1980
- Roth et al 2010
- Rothhaar et al 2014
- Roudakov et al 1996
- Roudakov et al 1998
- Row and Fischel 1963
- Rowen 1958
- Rowen 1958
- Royce
- Rubert and Lopez 1992
- Rubinstein 2014
- Rucci et al 2023
- Rudnik and Schwetzler 2014
- Rudolph 1972
- Rudolph 1986
- Ruetten 2018
- Ruetten et al 2014
- Ruf et al 1996
- Rufolo et al 2008
- Runckel and Henderson 1952
- Rusbarsky 1990
- Russell and Conley 2020
- Russo et al 1994
- Russo et al 2021
- Russo et al 2026
- Ryals et al 2026
- Ryan et al 2014
- Rysdyk and Calise
- Rysdyk et al 1997
- Răducanu and Cîrciu 2017
- S. Hameed and G. R 2021
- Sabatini 2014
- Sacher 1993
- Sacher and Zellner 1995
- Sachs 1977
- Sachs and Dinkelmann 1996
- Sachs and Moravszki 2002
- Sachs and Schoder 1991
- Saderla et al 2016
- Saderla et al 2017
- Safety advisory committee on 1987
- Sagan et al 2021
- Sagan et al 2025
- Sager 1995
- Sahoo and Peetala 2010
- Sakahara 2019
- Sakata 2002
- Sakraker and Chazot 2014
- Salis Brasil Neto et al 2006
- Salkind 1973
- Sallee 1964
- Salter 1975
- Saltzman 1953
- Saltzman and Ayers 1981
- Saltzman and Ayers 1982
- Saltzman and Ayers 1995
- Saltzman et al 1999
- Saltzman et al 2002
- Saltzman et al 2007
- Sambamurthi et al 1989
- Sambell 1972
- Sampson 2020
- Sams 1989
- Samuel et al 2018
- Samuel et al 2018
- Sandeep 2023
- Sanders 1964
- Sanders and Callaghan 1956
- Sanders and Townsend 2004
- Sanders et al 2022
- Sanderson 1964
- Sanderson 1965
- Sanderson 1975
- Sandlin 1984
- Sano et al 1984
- Sansica and Hashimoto 2023
- Santos Martins Nunes and Su 2024
- Sargent and Anemaat 2018
- Saric 2010
- Sarigul-Klijn and Huber 2006
- Saripalli and Kroutil 1985
- Sarkar and Panneerselvam 1998
- Sarker et al 2026
- Sasa et al 1991
- Sasongko and Sembiring 2012
- Sathe and Pant 2010
- Sato et al 1997
- Sato et al 2001
- Saturn in-flight experimental payload 1965
- Saturn in-flight experimental payload 1966
- Saturn in-flight experimental payload 1966
- Saturn in-flight experimental payload 1966
- Saunders 1996
- Sauser et al 2009
- Savino 2025
- Savu and Trifu 1993
- Sawyer and Bush 1997
- Sawyer and Bush 1998
- Sawyer et al 1997
- Sawyer et al 1998
- Sawyer et al 1999
- Scafetta 1983
- Scallion 1982
- Scallion 1999
- Schade 1968
- Schaefer 1948
- Schatzman and Malpica 2019
- Scher 1947
- Scherz and Tucker 1985
- Schilling and Mackall 1993
- Schkolnik et al 1995
- Schlickenmaier et al 2023
- Schlosser and Dominik 1983
- Schmidt 1987
- Schmidt and Linden 1972
- Schmidt and Linden 1972
- Schmidt and Mann 1996
- Schmisseur and Erbland 2012
- Schmitt and Burchett 2004
- Schmitz and Stepniewski 1973
- Schmoll 1993
- Schmoll and Cochrane 1996
- Schneider 1989
- Schneider et al 2012
- Schnulo and Hall 2020
- Schofield 1984
- Schouten and Saric 2008
- Schrader 2023
- Schrage and Meyer 1986
- Schrauf and Schröder 1999
- Schroeder 1987
- Schroers 1980
- Schuler et al 1972
- Schumacher 1952
- Schumacher and Zeh 2001
- Schuringa 1974
- Schuster and Lokos 1988
- Schuster et al 2016
- Schwabacher et al 2002
- Schwanz and Grimes 1980
- Schwartz 2019
- Schwartz and Shearer 1964
- Schwartz and Wray 1969
- Schwegler - Lanl and Place - Honeywell 2000
- Schweikhard 1983
- Schweikhard and Baker 1992
- Schweikhard and Renz 1986
- Schweikhard et al 1998
- Schweikhard et al 2001
- Schwing 2016
- Schütte et al 2012
- Scientific and Technical Information Division 1966
- Scott 1978
- Scott 1983
- Scott 2023
- Scott and Schrage 2012
- Seaberg et al 1972
- Seacord and Teitelbaum 1947
- Seanor
- Seanor et al 2004
- Sefic 1981
- Sefic and Cutler 1986
- Sefic and Maxwell 1986
- Sefic and Maxwell 1987
- Segall 2008
- Seger 1957
- Sehnert 1963
- Sekula et al 2012
- Sellers and Dwoyer 1992
- Sellers et al 1977
- Semke 2016
- Semke 2021
- Seren et al 2006
- Sexton 1964
- Sexton 2003
- Seybold et al 2007
- Sforza 2019
- Shafer 1984
- Shafer 1991
- Shafer 1994
- Shane 1992
- Shanks and Smith 1960
- Sharipkhojaevic 2025
- Sharma 1998
- Sharp 2010
- Shawler 1981
- Shawler 1983
- Shawler 1986
- Shawyer 2023
- Sheikman and Norman 2019
- Shen and Chen 2025
- Shen and Kang 2017
- Sheng et al 2022
- Shepperd and Staugler 1999
- Sheridan 1985
- Sheridan 1986
- Sherwood and Stevens 1993
- Shi Zhong-ke 1990
- Shields 1981
- Shimoyama et al 2004
- Shirouzu and Watanabe 1993
- Shlien 1991
- Shore 1986
- Shortal and Osterbout 1941
- Shovlin and Cochrane 1978
- Shtessel and Krupp
- Shtessel and Krupp 1997
- Shtessel et al 1997
- Shtessel et al 1998
- Shtessel et al 2000
- Shtessel et al 2002
- Siclari et al 1980
- Siddiqi and Abraham 1988
- Siddiqi and Kwa 1990
- Siddiqi and Neate 1986
- Sijabat and Indriyanto 2021
- Sijia et al 2021
- Sillen 1993
- Silva
- Silva 2011
- Silva et al 2006
- Silva et al 2026
- Silva-Martinez et al 2015
- Silz 1992
- Sim 1973
- Sim 1973
- Sim 1976
- Sim 1997
- Sim and Curry 1984
- Sim et al 1993
- Sim et al 1994
- Simioni et al 2013
- Simmons 2022
- Simmons 2023
- Simmons 2026
- Simmons and Ackerman 2026
- Simmons and Hatke 2021
- Simmons et al 2023
- Simmons et al 2025
- Simmons et al 2025
- Simon and Savage 1975
- Simons 1975
- Simpson 1972
- Simpson 1979
- Simpson and Tran 1991
- Simpson and Tran 1992
- Simpson et al 1989
- Simpson et al 1999
- Simpson et al 2000
- Simpson et al 2007
- Sims
- Sims and Carter 1981
- Sims et al 1989
- Simsek and Tekinalp 2015
- Simulation in support of 1988
- Sinacori 1970
- Singh 2023
- Singh and Ghosh 2006
- Singh and Ghosh 2007
- Singh and Ghosh 2023
- Singh et al 2005
- Singh et al 2024
- Sippel and Pohl 1996
- Sippel and Sippel 1997
- Sitz 1992
- Sivan and Murmu 2017
- Sivan and Pandian 2018
- Skarman 1978
- Skifstad 1970
- Skoog 1987
- Skujins and Cesnik 2010
- Slaby and Smith 2011
- Slapikas et al 2026
- Slapnicar
- Slender Lifting Body Axial 1994
- Sliwa 1979
- Small et al 1976
- Smart et al 2006
- Smayda and Goyne 2011
- Smeltzer et al 1974
- Smetana et al 1972
- Smith
- Smith
- Smith 1958
- Smith 1958
- Smith 1959
- Smith 1961
- Smith 1965
- Smith 1966
- Smith 1978
- Smith and Ahmed 2000
- Smith and McArdle 1990
- Smith and Pellicano 1992
- Smith and Ramirez 1986
- Smith and Smith 1997
- Smith and Stonum 1989
- Smith et al 1987
- Smith et al 1989
- Smith et al 2002
- Smith et al 2002
- Smith et al 2003
- Smith et al 2011
- Smith et al 2017
- Smotrova et al 2021
- Snyder and Schoultz 1976
- Soares 2007
- Soares 2007
- Sobolev 2018
- Sobron 2018
- Sobron et al 2021
- Sobrón Rueda 2021
- Social Goals of Defense 2019
- Soistmann and Spain 1993
- Son et al 2024
- Song et al 2000
- Song et al 2011
- Sorensen and Johansen 2017
- Sorensen et al 1975
- Sorenson 1971
- Soule 1973
- South 1974
- Soğukpinar and Cag 2022
- Space Policy and Edwards 1987
- Space Rocket Aircraft with 1936
- Spaceplane Coordinates 2016
- Spaceplane History 2002
- Spaceplane Low-Cost Potential 2002
- Spaceplane trip 2015
- Spacht 1983
- Spain et al 1993
- Spanò Cuomo and Guglieri 2021
- Sparkes 2024
- Spearman 1981
- Spearman 1983
- Spearman 1985
- Spearman 2003
- Spearman 2004
- Spearman 2005
- Spearman 2009
- Spearman and Torres 1992
- Spearman and Torres 1994
- Spencer et al 1996
- Spiegel et al 2016
- Spillman 1967
- Spitzer et al 1972
- Spivey et al 2021
- Spivey et al 2021
- Sponable et al 2004
- Spooner 1968
- Spravka and Jorris 2015
- Spravka and Jorris 2015
- Spreiter and Steffen 1946
- Springer 1994
- Springer 1996
- Springer 2008
- Springer et al 1982
- Spurlin and Lueck 1984
- Sridhar and Smith 2026
- Srijayantha 1983
- Srinathkumar et al 1995
- Srinivas and Chopra 1996
- Srinivas and Chopra 1998
- Srinivas et al 1995
- Srinivas et al 1998
- Srivasatava and Arun Kumar 2025
- St. John and Frederick 2013
- Staats et al 2025
- Stack 1962
- Stadler 1993
- Stahl et al 2017
- Stalcup and Heersema 2023
- Stalla et al 2026
- Standard Practice for Development
- Staniszewski 1999
- Stansbury et al 2013
- Stapleton et al 1997
- Stapleton et al 1998
- Starkey et al 2012
- Starkey et al 2014
- Staruk and Datta 2019
- Static Longitudinal Stability Flight 2003
- Statistics, Testing, and Defense 1999
- Statler 1966
- Steelant 2006
- Steelant 2008
- Steelant 2009
- Steelant 2011
- Stefko et al 1987
- Steils 1966
- Stein 2005
- Steinmetz et al 1972
- Stengel 1983
- Stephenson 1983
- Stephenson 1999
- Stephenson 2024
- Stephenson et al 2025
- Stepner and Mehra 1974
- Stepner and Sorensen 1974
- Stepniewski and Schneider 1964
- Sterk and McAtee 2015
- Sterk et al 2016
- Sterk et al 2018
- Sternberg 2010
- Sternfeld and Hinterkeuser 1970
- Stevens 1955
- Stevens et al 1966
- Stevens et al 1981
- Stewart 1992
- Stewart 2000
- Stewart 2016
- Stewart and Walters 1996
- Stewart et al 1992
- Stewart et al 2007
- Stillwell and Wilmerding 1951
- Stock 2002
- Stockman 1979
- Stoliker 2005
- Stoliker 2014
- Stoliker and Carter 2003
- Stollery 1972
- Stone 1946
- Stone and Koch 1979
- Stone and Piland 1991
- Storms 1991
- Stortz and ODonoghue 1995
- Stottier 1995
- Stough and Patton 1979
- Straub et al 1984
- Strecker and Arnold 2002
- Strock 1983
- Stroman 2008
- Strout and Atencio 1976
- Strutz 1972
- Study of the influence 1967
- Stutz and Price 1964
- Stytz et al 2001
- Su 2024
- Su and Liu 2025
- Su et al 2021
- Su et al 2021
- Subscale Modeling and Wind 2013
- Suit and Cannaday 1979
- Suit and Williams 1974
- Sullivan 1991
- Suminsby 2002
- Sun
- Sunami et al 2006
- Sung et al 2020
- Sunil
- Supersonic and Hypersonic Flight 1960
- Supersonic and Hypersonic Flight 2019
- Suppe 2000
- Suppes and Suppes 2026
- Support to X-33/Resusable Launch 2000
- Support to X-33/Reusable Launch 2000
- Survey of Shock Tube 1962
- Suzuki 2000
- Svec 1981
- Svendsen 1994
- Swaim 1969
- Swaim 1970
- Swaim and Connor 1968
- Swann et al 1981
- Swassing 2008
- Sweetman 1990
- Swenson 1980
- Swenson et al 1984
- Swihart 1992
- Symington 1940
- Szabolcsi 2018
- Szabolcsi 2018
- Szabolcsi 2018
- Szalai 1984
- Szymanski et al 2025
- Sóbester 2021
- Süelözgen 2023
- Taguchi et al 1999
- Taguchi et al 2001
- Taguchi et al 2012
- Tai 1996
- Taillon 1974
- Takagi et al 2014
- Takahashi 2014
- Takahashi et al 2015
- Takahashi et al 2023
- Takahashi et al 2023
- Takaki et al 1997
- Takarics and Vanek 2021
- Talay and Stone 1991
- Talty and Caughlin 1988
- Tan et al 2014
- Tanaka et al 2022
- Tanck and Steadman 1998
- Tancredi et al 2007
- Tang 1970
- Tang 1971
- Tang and Chase 2008
- Tang and Pearson 1971
- Tang and Pearson 1973
- Tang et al 1978
- Tangler 1979
- Tani et al 2023
- Taniguchi 1972
- Tanno and Tanno 2021
- Tao et al 2023
- Tapscott 1960
- Taranto and Abdulrahim 2023
- Tardif and Myrand-Lapierre 2025
- Tartabini et al 2000
- Tatry et al 1997
- Tatsuta et al 2025
- Taylor 1977
- Taylor 1982
- Taylor 2004
- Taylor 2009
- Taylor 2012
- Taylor and Jackson 1978
- Taylor and Klein 1981
- Taylor and Pamadi 1983
- Taylor and Ratnayake 2011
- Taylor and Wilkerson 1988
- Taylor et al 1965
- Taylor et al 2010
- Technology Demonstrator, Close Air 2023
- Teets 2016
- Teets and Harvey 2000
- Tekinalp and Cavus 2012
- Telford and Vasiloff 1968
- Temple 2006
- Tenney et al 1989
- Terrile et al 2015
- Testing of Advanced Carbon 1986
- Tetlow et al 2000
- Tew and Wallace 2010
- Tewell 1984
- Thakur et al 2019
- Thato Elijah and Rui Vasconcellos 2026
- The acquisition process acquiring 2009
- The Agard Flight TEST 1959
- The Analyses of Dynamic 2005
- The Bell X-22A V/STOL 1990
- The Canadair CL-84 experimental 1990
- The Current American Defense 2008
- The Darpa Model for 2024
- The Defense Acquisition Process 2008
- The Future of Unmanned 2016
- The graphic Skylon reusable 2011
- The NASA IVHM Technology 2000
- The ram-wing surface effect 1973
- The role of human 1986
- The Spaceplane Space AGE 2002
- The X-15, a rocket-assisted 1969
- Theodore et al 2014
- Thinking Critically about Defense 2020
- Tho and Smith 2011
- Thomas
- Thomas and Guy 1982
- Thomas and Powell 1992
- Thomas et al 1987
- Thomas et al 2010
- Thomas et al 2018
- Thomas et al 2022
- Thomas et al 2024
- Thomason 1982
- Thomason 1983
- Thomason 1983
- Thomason 1990
- Thompson 1966
- Thompson 1970
- Thompson 1970
- Thompson 2016
- Thompson 2026
- Thompson and Horton 1981
- Thompson et al 1990
- Thompson et al 1998
- Thompson et al 2000
- Thompson et al 2017
- Thomson 2025
- Thornburgh et al 2025
- Thornton 1994
- Thornton and Lamy 1992
- Threet et al 2011
- Throckmorton 1981
- Throckmorton 1992
- Tian et al 2013
- Tian et al 2026
- Tianyuan and Xiongqing 2009
- Tiltrotor Aircraft Modelling and 2018
- Tiltrotor Aircraft SCAS Design 2005
- Tindell 1966
- Tirtey and Boyce 2009
- Tirtey et al 2008
- Tirtey et al 2009
- Tirtey et al 2011
- Tischler 1991
- Tischler 1995
- Tischler 2018
- Tischler and Remple 2012
- Tischler et al 1985
- Titan II Research and 2002
- Tobiason and McShea 1986
- Tom et al 2009
- Tomac et al 2012
- Tomaine et al 1978
- Tomlinson et al 1990
- Tormen et al 2026
- Tournes 2013
- Tournes and Johnson 1998
- Tournes and Johnson 1998
- Tow 2010
- Tracy 1981
- Tragesser and Barton 1999
- Training Issues for Remotely 2016
- Tran and Lim 2020
- Tran and Lim 2022
- Tran and Simpson 1990
- Tran et al 2020
- Trankle and Rabin 1983
- Transition Dynamics of VTOL 2010
- Transonic flight test of 1994
- Traub 2024
- Travascio et al 2020
- Travassos and Kaufman 1979
- Traven and Whitley 1995
- Trevino et al 2012
- Trimble 1988
- Trimpi 1980
- Trippensee and Lux 1987
- Trippensee and Lux 1988
- Trittler et al 2008
- Trivailo et al 2013
- Trudelle et al 2017
- Trujill et al 1988
- Trujillo et al 2015
- Truong et al 2025
- Try et al 2020
- TsAGI investigations on hypersonic 2011
- Tsang 2016
- Tsench and Kurbanov 2023
- Tsuchiya and Suzuki 1998
- Tsuchiya and Suzuki 2001
- Tsukamoto et al 2003
- Tuck 1970
- Tucker et al 2008
- Tuohy 1998
- Tuohy 2006
- Tuozzo et al 2017
- Turan and Ünsal 2023
- Turk and Watts 1965
- Turnage et al 2019
- Turner 1969
- Turner 2003
- Turner and Drinkwater 1963
- Turner et al 2006
- Turtle and Hermann 1998
- Tvaryanas and Maupin 2013
- Twesme and Corzine 2003
- Tyll et al 2000
- Tymczyszyn and Barber 1974
- Tynis et al 2019
- UAV demonstrator opens up 2007
- UAV Flight Testing 2021
- Udroiu and Blaj 2016
- Ueda et al 2009
- Uehara and Matthies 2019
- Ueno et al 2002
- Ueno et al 2004
- Uhlár and Čerňan 2021
- Uijt_de_Haag and Vadlamani
- Ulbrich 2010
- Umadevi et al 2017
- Umeda et al 2007
- Underwood 1964
- Underwood et al 2003
- University Of South Florida Tampa 2000
- Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path 2014
- Unmanned Aircraft System Operations 2016
- Unmanned aircraft systems. Training
- Uppaluri and Douglass 1991
- Uppoor and Chopra 2026
- Uppoor et al 2026
- Urnes et al 1993
- Urschel and Cox 2003
- Ursu et al 2018
- US Air Force spaceplane 2010
- US military aircraft designations
- Using Cell-DEVS for Prototyping 2017
- Usry and Wallace 1971
- V-22 and AW609 Tiltrotors 2018
- V/STOL flight simulation 1979
- V/STOL R and D 1971
- V/STOL tilt rotor aircraft 1972
- V/STOL World wide view 1971
- Vachon et al 2005
- Vahl and Edwards 1978
- Valerdi et al 2015
- Valkov 2018
- Vallespin et al 2011
- Van Bavel 2014
- Van Camp and Williams 1974
- Van Dalsem 2019
- van den Abeelen 2016
- van den Abeelen 2017
- van der Meulen et al 2024
- van der Velde 2005
- Van Fossen and Dewitt 1988
- Van Gaasbeek 1980
- van Oort et al 2007
- Van Pelt 1981
- van Pelt 2012
- van Pelt 2012
- van Pelt 2012
- van Rooij and Cummings 2018
- van Rooij et al 2018
- van Rooij et al 2019
- Vanatta and Inderhees 1988
- Vannier
- Varela Martínez
- Vaughn et al 2012
- Vedrenne 1983
- Veletas 2026
- Vengate et al 2016
- Veraar 2009
- Verma and Peyada 2018
- Vermaas 2009
- Verstynen 1974
- Vertical Takeoff and Landing 2014
- Vertiports - Infrastructure and
- Veselenak and Beutelman 2004
- Vesely 1986
- Vetter 1966
- Vezirov 2026
- Vicory 1968
- Vicroy et al 2012
- Vicroy et al 2018
- Victory 1938
- Vidal 1974
- Vieira and Bravo 2016
- Viken et al 2017
- Viladegut 2018
- Viladegut Farran
- Vincent and Franklin 1981
- Vinson 1998
- Viper CNC fibre placement 2000
- Virasak 2022
- Virgil Petrescu 2019
- Vishesh and Sivasubramanian 2023
- Vitale et al 2026
- Voland et al 1999
- Voland et al 2005
- Vos et al 2002
- Voss et al 2011
- Voss et al 2026
- VSTOL Systems Research Aircraft 1994
- VTOL ‘a matter of 1971
- VTOL - 1968 1969
- VTOL Aircraft Control Design 2010
- Véras et al 2022
- Vértesy
- Wachtell 1970
- Wacker et al 2001
- Wadcock et al 2013
- Wade et al 2026
- Wadhams et al 2007
- Wadhams et al 2008
- Wadhams et al 2008
- Waesche and Migdal 1977
- Waggoner and Bates 1989
- Waggoner et al 2018
- Waggoner et al 2020
- Wagner et al 1998
- Walan and Lydecker 2023
- Waldersen 2018
- Walker 1961
- Walker and Gupta 1983
- Walker and Weil 1963
- Walker and Wolowicz 1960
- Walker and Wolowicz 1962
- Wall 1964
- Wallace
- Wallace 1978
- Wallace 1982
- Wallace 1996
- Wallace 2000
- Wallace et al 2003
- Wallace et al 2023
- Wallick 1978
- Walsh and Hart 1981
- Walters 1981
- Wan et al 2025
- Wang
- Wang 2024
- Wang and Zhang 2018
- Wang et al 1986
- Wang et al 1996
- Wang et al 2002
- Wang et al 2020
- Wang et al 2020
- Wang et al 2021
- Wang et al 2022
- Wang et al 2024
- Wang et al 2024
- Wang et al 2025
- Wang et al 2025
- Wang et al 2026
- Wangu and Mouyos 1998
- Ward 1984
- Ward 1988
- Ward 1989
- Ward and Bennett 1974
- Ward and Miley 1983
- Ward and Miley 1984
- Ward and Myers 1967
- Ward et al 2025
- Ward et al 2026
- Wardana et al 2021
- Ware 1989
- Ware 1989
- Ware and Cruz 1993
- Ware et al 1991
- Warsop and Crowther 2019
- Wartemann et al 2017
- Wartmann 2015
- Wassel et al 1995
- Watanabe et al 1996
- Watanabe et al 1997
- Watanabe et al 1997
- Watson and Hardy 1983
- Watson et al 1967
- Watts et al 1965
- Webb et al 1979
- Weeks 1986
- Weeks et al 2006
- Wegener 1991
- Wegener 1997
- Wei 2021
- Wei et al 2019
- Weidner et al 1976
- Weihs et al 2008
- Weil 1962
- Weil 1981
- Weiland and Hirschel 2009
- Weilmuenster and Hamilton 1986
- Weinig 2019
- Weiss 1992
- Weiss et al 1994
- Weissenburger and Zimmerman 1963
- Welberg et al 2015
- Welch et al 1999
- Wells 1987
- Wells and Klein 1982
- Wells and Queijo 1977
- Wells and Yinger 1964
- Wells et al 1981
- Wells et al 1982
- Welstead et al 2017
- Welton 1965
- Weltz et al 2007
- Wen et al 2019
- Wen et al 2021
- Wen et al 2023
- Wentz et al 1985
- Wernicke 1980
- Werrell and Peebles 1998
- West and Bynum 2024
- Westbrook 1964
- Westbrook 1975
- Wetmore 1965
- Wetzel
- Whalen and Bragg 2005
- Whalley et al 2001
- Whalley et al 2016
- Wheaton et al 2026
- Wheeler 2000
- Whipple and Ricket 1986
- White 1993
- White 2005
- White and Condon 1978
- White and Hyatt 2016
- White et al 1985
- White et al 1985
- White et al 2024
- Whitefield et al 1981
- Whiteside and Welstead 2026
- Whitfield and Blackburn 1965
- Whitford and Whitford 1997
- Whitmore and Moes 1994
- Whitmore and Moes 1999
- Whitmore et al 1997
- Whitten 1960
- Whittley 1973
- Wichman et al 1996
- Wierzbanowski and Armstrong 1991
- Wierzbanowski and Kasten 1990
- Wierzbanowski and Ramasubramanian 2020
- Wilcox 1973
- Wilcox and Quigley 1978
- Wilder and Prabhu 2021
- Wilder et al 2020
- Wilhite 1977
- Wilhite et al 2024
- Willhite and Ghatas 2025
- Williams 1991
- Williams and Hartford 1987
- Williams and Johnson 2015
- Williams and Ybarra 1981
- Williams and Ybarra 1981
- Williams et al 1994
- Williams-Hayes 2004
- Williamson 1992
- Williamson et al 1996
- Willis 1980
- Willis 1980
- Willis 1981
- Willis and Genever-Watling 1977
- Wills 2015
- Wills 2015
- Wilner 1979
- Wilson
- Wilson 1966
- Wilson 1967
- Wilson and Wright 1965
- Wilson et al 1981
- Wilson et al 1982
- Wilson et al 1983
- Winborn 1970
- Winchenbach et al 1982
- Wind Tunnel/Flight Test Correlation 1978
- Windham 1956
- Windham 2020
- Windolph 1969
- Winebarger and Neely 1984
- Wingrove 1972
- Wingrove 1975
- Wingrove 1978
- Winick 1968
- Winston 1969
- Winston et al 1975
- Wise 2003
- Wiseman and Lopez 2026
- Wiston and Yan 2025
- Wiswell et al 1961
- Witkowski et al 2015
- Wittliff et al 1992
- Wolf and Bossert 2001
- Wolf and Sansone 2002
- Wolfe
- Wolfe and Bakalyar 2011
- Wolkovitch 1984
- Wolkovitch et al 1971
- Wolowicz and Yancey 1973
- Wong et al 1958
- Wong et al 2019
- Woo et al 2022
- Wood
- Wood 1972
- Woodbury 2003
- Woodbury and Gorman 1983
- Woodman 1971
- Woods 1957
- Woodyard 2026
- Woolf 2012
- Woolf 2012
- Woollett 1981
- Woolley 1978
- Wright 2006
- Wu and Chen 2021
- Wu and Li 2025
- Wu and Liu 2021
- Wu and Zhang 2023
- Wu et al 2020
- Wu Liaoni and Wang Mengmeng 2012
- Wulff and Zoellner 1991
- Wustenhagen et al 2021
- Wyatt 2003
- Wygle 1981
- Wykes and Lawrence 1971
- X-15, Research at the 1963
- X-24C research vehicle 1974
- X-29 Research Aircraft 1991
- X-31 Tailless Testing 1994
- X-33, X-34, X-37 Press 1999
- X-38 Phase 3 Drops 2000
- XCOR, Developing the Next 2016
- Xiao et al 2018
- Xiao et al 2020
- Xu and Tang 2010
- Xu et al 2019
- Xu et al 2020
- Xu et al 2020
- Xu et al 2025
- Xu et al 2026
- Yamada et al 2023
- Yamamoto and Yoshioka 1995
- Yamamoto et al 2001
- Yamamoto et al 2002
- Yamanaka 2003
- Yamanaka et al 2001
- Yamato et al 1988
- Yamato et al 1991
- Yan and Fu 2026
- Yan and von der Dunk 1992
- Yan et al 2025
- Yanagihara et al 1991
- Yancey 1964
- Yang 2021
- Yang 2024
- Yang and Wang 2017
- Yang and Xia 2011
- Yang and Yee 2022
- Yang et al 2006
- Yang et al 2024
- Yang et al 2024
- Yao et al 2018
- Yarlett et al 2000
- Yasir 2025
- Yassini and Syrovy 2002
- Yasue 2020
- Yavuztürk et al 2017
- Ye 2023
- Yechout 1988
- Yechout 1988
- Yechout and Braman 1984
- Yeo et al 2016
- Yeo et al 2023
- Yergensen and Rhea 1988
- Yin et al 2020
- Yin et al 2024
- Yip et al 1990
- Yip et al 1990
- Yip et al 1991
- Yip et al 1992
- Yokokawa et al 2017
- Yoo and Strash 1990
- Yoo et al 2021
- Yoshinaga et al 1995
- Young 1961
- Young 1966
- Young 1982
- Young 2015
- Young 2022
- Young and Findlay 1985
- Young and Rajagopalan 2013
- Young et al 2011
- Youngshin Kang et al 2008
- Yu and Zhao 2026
- Yu et al 2021
- Yuan 1970
- Yuan et al 2019
- Yuan et al 2022
- Yue and Xia 2009
- Yue et al 2023
- Yue et al 2025
- Yuta Akai et al 2007
- Zabinsky and Burnham 1975
- Zabinsky and Burnham 1977
- Zagainov and Plokhikh 1991
- Zahn et al 2024
- Zakkay et al 1981
- Zalay et al 1979
- Zalesak 1981
- Zander 2025
- Zanon and De Gennaro 2022
- Zarrouati et al 1988
- Zeng and Kukreja 2013
- Zenowicz et al 2024
- Zerweckh et al 1988
- Zhang et al 2011
- Zhang et al 2012
- Zhang et al 2016
- Zhang et al 2018
- Zhang et al 2018
- Zhang et al 2021
- Zhang et al 2021
- Zhang et al 2023
- Zhang et al 2024
- Zhang et al 2024
- Zhang et al 2025
- Zhao et al 2025
- Zhao et al 2026
- Zhdanov et al 2025
- Zhen Pan et al 2016
- Zheng et al 2026
- Zhi et al 2015
- Zhiqiang et al 2015
- Zhixin 2022
- Zhixin 2022
- Zhou et al 2021
- Zhou et al 2022
- Zhou et al 2022
- Zhou et al 2026
- Zhu and Liu 2015
- Zhu and Wang 2025
- Zhu et al 2024
- Zimmerman 1957
- Zimmerman 1960
- Zimper and Hummel 2018
- Zimpfer 1999
- Zipf 1989
- Zubrin and Clapp 1996
- Zuccaro 1965
- Zumwalt and Mueller 1984
- Öhrle et al 2019
- Özger 2012
Related Post
- X-Planes: Framing and the Research Aircraft Model
- X-Planes: Bell X-1
- X-Planes: Bell X-2
- X-Planes: Douglas X-3 Stiletto
- X-Planes: Northrop X-4 Bantam
- X-Planes: Bell X-5
- X-Planes: Convair X-6
- X-Planes: Lockheed X-7
- X-Planes: Aerojet X-8 Aerobee
- X-Planes: Bell X-9 Shrike
- X-Planes: North American X-10
- X-Planes: Convair X-11
- X-Planes: Convair X-12
- X-Planes: Ryan X-13 Vertijet
- X-Planes: Bell X-14
- X-Planes: North American X-15
- X-Planes: Bell X-16
- X-Planes: Lockheed X-17
- X-Planes: Hiller X-18
- X-Planes: Curtiss-Wright X-19
- X-Planes: Boeing X-20 Dyna-Soar
- X-Planes: Northrop X-21
- X-Planes: Bell X-22
- X-Planes: Martin Marietta X-23 PRIME and a Contested Assignment
- X-Planes: Martin Marietta X-24
- X-Planes: Bensen X-25
- X-Planes: Schweizer X-26 Frigate
- X-Planes: Lockheed X-27
- X-Planes: Osprey X-28 Sea Skimmer
- X-Planes: Grumman X-29
- X-Planes: Rockwell X-30 and the National Aero-Space Plane
- X-Planes: Rockwell-MBB X-31
- X-Planes: Boeing X-32
- X-Planes: Lockheed Martin X-33
- X-Planes: Orbital Sciences X-34
- X-Planes: Lockheed Martin X-35
- X-Planes: McDonnell Douglas X-36
- X-Planes: Boeing X-37
- X-Planes: Scaled Composites X-38
- X-Planes: X-39, Reserved but Never Assigned
- X-Planes: Boeing X-40
- X-Planes: X-41 Common Aero Vehicle
- X-Planes: Orbital Sciences X-42
- X-Planes: Micro-Craft X-43 Hyper-X
- X-Planes: X-44, One Designation and Two Aircraft
- X-Planes: Boeing X-45
- X-Planes: Boeing X-46
- X-Planes: Northrop Grumman X-47
- X-Planes: Boeing X-48
- X-Planes: Piasecki X-49 SpeedHawk
- X-Planes: Boeing X-50 Dragonfly
- X-Planes: Boeing X-51 Waverider
- X-Planes: X-52, the Designation Refused
- X-Planes: Boeing X-53 Active Aeroelastic Wing
- X-Planes: Gulfstream X-54
- X-Planes: Lockheed Martin X-55 ACCA
- X-Planes: Lockheed Martin X-56
- X-Planes: ESAero X-57 Maxwell
- X-Planes: X-58, the Slot Taken by XQ-58
- X-Planes: Lockheed Martin X-59 Quesst
- X-Planes: Generation Orbit X-60
- X-Planes: Dynetics X-61 Gremlins
- X-Planes: Lockheed Martin X-62 VISTA
- X-Planes: ABL Space Systems X-63
- X-Planes: Invocon X-64
- X-Planes: Aurora Flight Sciences X-65 CRANE
- X-Planes: Boeing X-66
- X-Planes: X-67, the Slot Taken by XQ-67A
- X-Planes: General Atomics X-68 LongShot
- X-Planes: X-69 through X-75, the Leapfrogged Block
- X-Planes: Bell Textron X-76 SPRINT